Appendix B Bargaining Intent: Implementation of the New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Appendix B Bargaining Intent: Implementation of the new evaluation language, these are the possible permutations of a six-year cycle for permanent members eligible for Self-Assessment. A E Year One Formal Conference Year One Formal Conference Year Two Nothing Year Two Nothing Year Three Formal Conference Year Three Self-Assessment Year Four Nothing Year Four Nothing Year Five Formal Conference Year Five Self-Assessment Year Six Nothing Year Six Nothing Year Seven Formal Conference Year Seven Formal Conference B F Year One Formal Conference Year One Formal Conference Year Two Nothing Year Two Nothing Year Three Formal Conference Year Three Self-Assessment Year Four Nothing Year Four Nothing Year Five Self-Assessment Year Five Skip by Admin Year Six Nothing Year Six Nothing Year Seven Formal Conference Year Seven Formal Conference C G Year One Formal Conference Year One Formal Conference Year Two Nothing Year Two Nothing Year Three Formal Conference Year Three Skip by Admin Year Four Nothing Year Four Nothing Year Five Skip by Admin Year Five Formal Conference Year Six Nothing Year Six Nothing Year Seven Formal Conference Year Seven Formal Conference D H Year One Formal Conference Year One Formal Conference Year Two Nothing Year Two Nothing Year Three Self-Assessment Year Three Skip by Admin Year Four Nothing Year Four Nothing Year Five Formal Conference Year Five Self-Assessment Year Six Nothing Year Six Nothing Year Seven Formal Conference Year Seven Formal Conference .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The School Curriculum and Sats in England: Reforms Since 2010
BRIEFING PAPER Number 06798, 26 February 2016 The school curriculum By Nerys Roberts and SATs in England: Reforms since 2010 PHOTO REDACTED DUE TO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OR OTHER LEGAL ISSUES Inside: 1. Overview: the school curriculum in England 2. Background to the national curriculum review in 2011 onwards 3. Reforms to the national curriculum tests (SATs) and the way pupils are assessed Annex: development of the National Curriculum www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 06798, 26 February 2016 2 Contents Summary 3 What do schools in England have to teach? 3 Changes to the national curriculum from September 2014 3 1. Overview: the school curriculum in England 4 1.1 Maintained schools 4 Statutory requirements for the curriculum at maintained English schools 4 The four key stages of the national curriculum 5 Programmes of study 5 Withdrawing children from particular subjects 5 1.2 Curriculum at academies and free schools 5 1.3 School curricula in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 6 1.4 What subjects are currently included in the English national curriculum? 7 2. Background to the national curriculum review in 2011 onwards 8 2.1 Reaction to the June 2012 proposals 8 2.2 Further consultation on programmes of study: February and July 2013 9 2.3 July 2013 – second formal consultation 10 2.4 First final curriculum documents published in September 2013 10 2.5 Reform to GCSEs, AS and A Levels 11 3. Reforms to the national curriculum tests (SATs) and the way pupils
[Show full text]
Year Five and Six Parents' Curriculum Meeting
St Joan of Arc RC Primary Year Two and Three Parents’ Curriculum Meeting F R I D A Y 4 TH OCTOBER Aims of the meeting Give you a better understanding of your child’s learning this term Share our aims Help parents/carers to feel empowered to support their children Give you the opportunity to ask questions Introductions Miss Newman– Year 2 and 3 lead. Behaviour lead Supporting classroom teachers Developing good classroom practice Monitoring pupil progress Part of the English and PE teams Homework - Reading At least 10-20 minutes daily in Year Two, and at least 20 minutes daily in Year Three. Signed reading record (comments are really helpful) Discussion about the text Sounding out and applying phonic knowledge Reading around the word Checking for understanding Predicting Inference and deduction Intonation and expression Comprehension cards Reading Records National Curriculum statements at front Signed off by teacher during guided reading Comment in book only if child not meet the statement in the lesson Ideas for home reading in the middle Homework - Reading Roy had waited a long time but nothing was happening. Then suddenly the line jerked. In his excitement he tripped over my bag and fell head first into the water. a. What was Roy doing before he fell? b. Why did he become excited? Homework - Reading By the time we reached the small village the sun was going down. After so long on the road we were glad to be able to take off our boots and rub our sore feet. a. What time of the day was it? b.
[Show full text]
Texans Getting Academically Prepared (Tgap)
TEXANS GETTING ACADEMICALLY PREPARED (TGAP) Year Six Evaluation Report September 2004 – August 2005 March 2006 Prepared for Texas Education Agency By Texas Center for Educational Research Center for Public Policy at the University of Houston TEXANS GETTING ACADEMICALLY PREPARED (TGAP) Year Six Evaluation Report September 2004 – August 2005 March 2006 Prepared for Texas Education Agency Prepared By Texas Center for Educational Research Center for Public Policy at the University of Houston ©Texas Center for Educational Research Credits Texas Center for Educational Research Contributing Authors The Texas Center for Educational Research Texas Center for Educational Research (TCER) conducts and communicates nonpartisan Kelly Shapley, Ph.D. research on education issues to serve as an Keith Sturges, MAA independent resource for those who make, Daniel Sheehan, Ed.D. influence, or implement education policy in Texas. A 15-member board of trustees governs the Center for Public Policy research center, including appointments from the at the University of Houston Texas Association of School Boards, Texas Gregory R. Weiher Association of School Administrators, and State Christina Hughes Board of Education. Joseph Howard For additional information about TCER research, please contact: Prepared for Kelly S. Shapley, Director Texas Center for Educational Research Texas Education Agency 12007 Research Blvd. 1701 N. Congress Avenue P.O. Box 679002 Austin, Texas 78701-1494 Austin, Texas 78767-9002 Phone: 512-463-9734 Phone: 512-467-3632 or 800-580-8237 Fax: 512-467-3658 Research Funded by Reports are available on the TCER Web Site at www.tcer.org Texas Education Agency Texans Getting Academically Prepared (TGAP) Year Six Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
(SSOG): Year Five Report
Nevada System of Higher Education Silver State Opportunity Grant (SSOG) Year 5 Report January 29, 2021 THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION Board of Regents Dr. Mark W. Doubrava, Chair Mrs. Carol Del Carlo, Vice Chair Mr. Joseph C. Arrascada Mr. Patrick J. Boylan Mr. Byron Brooks Dr. Patrick R. Carter Ms. Amy J. Carvalho Dr. Jason Geddes Mrs. Cathy McAdoo Mr. Donald Sylvantee McMichael Sr. Mr. John T. Moran Ms. Laura E. Perkins Dr. Lois Tarkanian Officers of the Nevada System of Higher Education Dr. Melody Rose, Chancellor Dr. Keith Whitfield, President Mr. Brian Sandoval, President University of Nevada, Las Vegas University of Nevada, Reno Mr. Bart J. Patterson, President Dr. Federico Zaragoza, President Nevada State College College of Southern Nevada Ms. Joyce M. Helens, President Dr. Karin M. Hilgersom, President Great Basin College Truckee Meadows Community College Dr. Vincent R. Solis, President Dr. Kumud Acharya, President Western Nevada College Desert Research Institute 2 The Silver State Opportunity Grant Program Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 ELIGIBILITY ........................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Opening a Studio School a Guide for Studio School Proposer Groups on the Pre-Opening Stage
Opening a studio school A guide for studio school proposer groups on the pre-opening stage August 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Section 1 - Who does what - roles and responsibilities? 5 Section 2 - Managing your project 10 Section 3 – Governance 12 Section 4 - Pupil recruitment and admissions 21 Section 5 - Statutory consultation 33 Section 6 - Staffing and education plans 36 Section 7 - Site and buildings 42 Section 8 – Finance 56 Section 9 - Procurement and additional support 63 Section 10 - Funding Agreement 67 Section 11 - The equality duty 71 Section 12 - Preparing to open 73 Section 13 - Once your school is open 80 Annex A - RSC regions and Local authorities 82 2 Introduction Congratulations! All your planning and preparation has paid off, and the Secretary of State for Education has agreed that your application to open a studio school should move to the next stage of the process – known as the ‘pre-opening’ stage. This is the stage between the approval of your application and the opening of the school. The setting up of a studio school is a challenging but ultimately very rewarding task and it will require significant commitment and time from sponsors and partners. Your original application set out your plans for establishing the studio school, from the education vision and the admission of pupils to the recruitment of staff and the curriculum. Now your application has been approved, you must begin work to implement these plans. The letter of approval you received from the Department for Education (DfE) sets out important conditions of approval. It is vital that you consider these conditions carefully in planning your priorities and what you need to focus on next.
[Show full text]
School Admissions in England: State-Funded Schools
BRIEFING PAPER Number 07147, 11 January 2016 School admissions in By Nerys Roberts England: state-funded mainstream schools PHOTO REDACTED DUE TO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OR OTHER LEGAL ISSUES Inside: 1. Background to school admissions in England and the legal framework 2. Applying for a school place in the normal round 3. How admission authorities rank applicants 4. Parents unhappy with offered school place 5. Statistics on school place offers for 2015/16 6. Schools Adjudicator report www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 07147, 11 January 2016 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Background to school admissions in England and the legal framework 4 1.1 Admission authorities and statutory admissions framework 4 Application of school admissions codes to academies and free schools 4 1.2 Determining admission arrangements 5 2. Applying for a school place in the normal round 6 2.1 School starting age in England 7 Summer born children starting school 7 Deferring a reception place, or attending part-time initially 7 2.2 How far in advance do parents have to apply for a place? 8 2.3 Guidance for parents and carers on school admission process 8 2.4 Selecting schools: naming preferred schools on the application form 8 Myths about naming more than one school on the application form 9 Nominating schools in other local authority areas 9 2.5 When a child has two addresses because of shared care 9 2.6 Moving into the area after the application deadline 9 2.7 School places for children returning or arriving from abroad 9 2.8 Obtaining a school place dishonestly 10 3.
[Show full text]
Tobbelltransition.Pdf
University of Huddersfield Repository Tobbell, Jane Transition from primary to secondary school: a case study from the United Kingdom Original Citation Tobbell, Jane (2014) Transition from primary to secondary school: a case study from the United Kingdom. In: Facetten von Übergängen im Bildungssystem Nationale und internationale Ergebnisse empirischer Forschun. Waxmann, Münster, Germany, pp. 251-264. ISBN 978-3-8309-3063-1 This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/21064/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ Tobbell, J. (2014) The Transition from Primary to Secondary School: a case study from the United Kingdom in Liegmann, A.B., Mammes, I. and Racherbäumer, K. eds (2014) Facetten von Übergängen im Bildungssystem:Nationale und internationale Ergebnisse empirischer Forschung, Waxmann:Münster ISBN 978-3-8309-3063- Transition from primary to secondary school: a case study from the United Kingdom This chapter presents ethnographic research from a project which followed children in a UK primary school in their final year (referred to as year six, children are 10 and 11 years old) in primary school to their first year in secondary school (referred to as year seven, children are 11 and 12 years old).
[Show full text]
What Happened the Six Dimensions Project Report 2018 Nick Allen
What Happened The Six Dimensions Project Report 2018 Nick Allen June 2018 SFCA works to lead and support a thriving and sustainable Sixth Form College sector by being an effective advocate, adviser and information provider for members and a reliable and authoritative source of insight, data and expertise for policy-makers and opinion-formers. For more information about this report please contact Vanessa Donhowe: Sixth Form Colleges Association 8th Floor 50 Broadway London SW1H 0RG 020 3824 0468 [email protected] sixthformcolleges.org © Sixth Form Colleges Association What Happened The Six Dimensions Project Report 2018 Contents Chapter One: Known Knowns, Known Unknowns and Unknown Unknowns Revisited Chapter Two: Retention on Two Year A level Courses Chapter Three: Performance in Linear A levels in Sixth Form Colleges Chapter Four: The Quality of Equality Chapter Five: The Gender Agenda Chapter Six: Programmes of Study and Patterns of Enrolment Appendix One: Understanding Six Dimensions Reports Introduction In the autumn of 2017, What Happened, Hillary Clinton’s account of the 2016 election campaign was published. It had a rather good and deliberately ambiguous title, interpretable in whole range of ways. From a gentle, enquiring ‘so what happened’, to a forensically analytical ‘what happened?’, through to a raging primal scream of ‘what happened?’. In Hilary’s case, Trump happened, and the interpretation of how that happened will keep psephologists busy for some time. Last year, something significant happened to us. It may not have been Trump sized, but nevertheless, the conclusion of the first round of A level reform represents a fundamental shift in the landscape, and understanding and navigating this shift represents a vital challenge for colleges.
[Show full text]
Primary and Secondary Textbook Complexity in England
Research Brief Primary and Secondary Textbook Complexity in England Heather Koons, Ph.D., Director of Research Services; Laura Bush, Research Specialist; and Eleanor E. Sanford-Moore, Ph.D., Senior Vice President, Research and Development speak to the accessibility of the content. If year three pupils are ABSTRACT presented with reading materials at a level of complexity above their The study examined the text complexity of textbooks available for reading ability level, learning the material could be quite challenging. use in English maintained primary and secondary schools that Conversely, materials written significantly below a pupil’s ability level address select mandatory courses: English, mathematics, science, may foster boredom in the classroom and limit the pace of learning. history, geography and citizenship, for years one through 11, key A first step in understanding the relationship between pupils and stages 1 through 4. text is to understand the text complexity of the materials. This is the purpose of the current study. The research hypothesis was that text complexity varies within school year and key stage and that the median text complexity increases with school year/key stage. The results supported the hypothesis. MATERIALS However the findings highlight the fact that the greatest increase in The unit of analysis in this study was textbooks (N = 211) available complexity across the years and key stages occurs early on when for use in England’s primary and secondary schools. An effort was young readers are still developing their reading skills: between years made to obtain textbooks written specifically for the new 2015 one and two and between key stage 1 and 2.
[Show full text]
Qualifications at Level 5: Progressing in a Career Or to Higher Education
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training WORKING PAPER No 23 Qualifications at level 5: progressing in a career or to higher education Qualifications at level 5: progressing in a career or to higher education Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 Cedefop working papers are unedited documents, available only electronically. They make results of Cedefop’s work promptly available and encourage further discussion. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 ISBN 978-92-896-1630-0 ISSN 1831-2403 doi: 10.2801/77593 Copyright © European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), 2014 All rights reserved. The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is the European Union’s reference centre for vocational education and training. We provide information on and analyses of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. Cedefop was established in 1975 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75. Europe 123, 570 01 Thessaloniki (Pylea), GREECE PO Box 22427, 551 02 Thessaloniki, GREECE Tel. +30 2310490111, Fax +30 2310490020 E-mail: [email protected] www.cedefop.europa.eu James J. Calleja, Director Barbara Dorn, Chair of the Governing Board Qualifications at level 5: progressing in a career or to higher education Foreword This study examines qualifications at level 5 of the European qualifications framework (EQF) (1). It shows that EQF level 5 qualifications play an important role in providing access to employment and career advancement, as well as enabling further learning and progression to higher education.
[Show full text]
Doctor of Education
Faculty of Education Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Education More than the sum of its parts: practitioner perspectives on the characteristics, affordances and challenges of all-through schools in the English state system. April 2020 Words: 79,985 Helen Elizabeth Price Fitzwilliam College Supervisor: Dr Sue Swaffield Copyright © 2020 Helen Price 2 Preface This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or is being concurrently submitted, for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. 3 4 Abstract Helen Price More than the sum of its parts: practitioner perspectives on the characteristics, affordances and challenges of all-through schools This research focuses on the small but growing number of English all-through state schools. In the wider school system hundreds of thousands of children transfer schools for their secondary education each year. The social challenges faced at transfer and the curricular and pedagogical disconnects between primary and secondary education are well documented in the literature. This thesis explores the opportunities provided by the all-through configuration to ease these difficulties and create a cohesive approach across all educational phases. This is a sequential mixed methods study.
[Show full text]
How Schools Are Integrating New Migrant Pupils and Their Families
HOW SCHOOLS ARE INTEGRATING NEW MIGRANT PUPILS AND THEIR FAMILIES Chiara Manzoni and Heather Rolfe March 2019 About the National Institute of Economic and Social Research The National Institute of Economic and Social Research is Britain's longest established independent research institute, founded in 1938. The vision of our founders was to carry out research to improve understanding of the economic and social forces that affect people’s lives, and the ways in which policy can bring about change. Eighty years later, this remains central to NIESR’s ethos. We continue to apply our expertise in both quantitative and qualitative methods and our understanding of economic and social issues to current debates and to influence policy. The Institute is independent of all party political interests. National Institute of Economic and Social Research 2 Dean Trench St London SW1P 3HE T: +44 (0)20 7222 7665 E: [email protected] niesr.ac.uk Registered charity no. 306083 This report was first published in March 2019 © National Institute of Economic and Social Research 2019 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ ii 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]