DOCSLIB.ORG

THE BIOLOGY OP SOME BRITISH Spha8h0obrid PLIES. .K Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1. THE BIOLOGY OP SOME BRITISH SPHA8h0OBRID PLIES. .k thesis submitted in part fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University' of London. by ELAINE hui'JC:Ea CICELY. Imperial College of Science and Technology, Silwood Park, Sunninghill, Ascot, Berkshire. September, 1969. 2. ABSTRACT Records of seasonal occurrence and habitat ranges of 73 species of SPh.A.AROC_,JAIDA (Diptera) were ob-tined from material collected at Silwood Park, Berkshire. Life-history data obtained in the laboratory for Leptocera caenosa, L.fungicola, L.appendiculata, L.heteroneura, L.moesta, and L.claviventris. L.pullula and L.parapusio found to be parthenogenic: unmated females producing fertile eggs which developed into an all-female generation. Immature stages of 29 species (3 - Sphaerocera, 2 - Copromyza, 24 - Leptocera) des- cribed and figured. Key to puparia of 3 British genera. New species (Species A), closely allied to L.(L.)fungicola Haliday described. Identification of 66 species from material collected in two suction traps (4ft. and 30ft. above ground), demonstrated that aerial fauna sampled by the traps, dependent upon habitats in immediate vicinity (i.e. micro-habitat complex of open grassland). Possible to make a distinction between predominantly grassland and predominantly 3. woodland species: species known to occur in beech woodland near the traps were not identified in trap material. 2bur dominant species in traps: Leptocera curvinervis, L.clunipes, L.moesta, Sphaerocera pusilla. Assessment of monthly varia- tion showed no peaks in flight activity. The ratio of male to female in the samples was about equal. 48.44 of all specimens of L.spinipennis were collect- ed in trap at 30ft., other species mainly confined to the trap at 4ft. Thirty-one species (1 - Sphaerocera; 6 - Copromyza; 24 - Leptocera) found in association with rabbit-burrows. Boiled grass deposited as a bait in the burrows over eighteen months, and puparia extracted. Predominant species bred, were Leptocera claviventris, L.bequaerti, L.palmata, Copromyza fimetaria, and L.manicata. Numbers of parasites obtained (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Chalcidoidea and Cynipoidea). Deposition of bait in other habitats made it possible to distinguish between species attracted to the bait from outside the burrow, and species definitely associated with the rabbit burrows as a microhabitat. 4. T.113hE 07 Cc:INTENTS Page ABSTRACT 2 SBCTION I. INTAODUCTION. 7-8 SECTION II. LIM HISTORIES AND HABITAT DATA. 9-109 1. INTRODUCTION. 9 2. SPECIES LIST. 14 3. M:IT'AIALS E.MHODS 18 a. Collection Techniques. 18 b. Laboratory Breeding Methods. 21 4. TAPE HISTORY D.F.,TA AND NABITAT RECORDS. 28 5. DESCRIPTION QV A NTIJ SPECIES. 103 6. GENEKIC "D"LY TO PUPARIA. 109 SCTION III. ANA.hYSIS OP SUCTION- TRAP RECORDS. 110-137 1. INTRODUCTIO-N. 110 2. Tr,2;- TRAPS AND Tahp 112 3. AMIAL..1211NA. 114 a. Composition of the fauna. 114 b. Variation in the fauna at difZerent heights. 124 5. Page. c. Variation in the fauna throughout the year. 124 d. Variation in the sex-ratios. 126 e. Influence of the weather. 129 f. Parasitic kttack. 134 g. Teneral Flies. 135 h. Comparison of the suction-trap fauna with other collections made in the vicinity of the traps. 135 SIICTION IV. THE 3PEAEa0CEID PATMA IN BURROWS or f[41 RABBIT (ORYCTCLAGUS c'TINICUIUS L.) 138-203 1. INTRODUCTION. 138 2. T1.1 DS. 143 a. Description and Location of sites. 143 b. Description of "Bait-Trap". 144 c. Sampling Procedure. 145 d. Extraction of puparia from bait, and emergence of adult flies. 146 6. Page. 3. MTEOROLOGICAL 7, ACT01-6. 149 4. AUVIROW FkONA. 152 a. Composition of the fauna. 152 b. Seasonal variation in the numbers of the inhabitant species. 154 c. Variation in the sex-ratio. 168 d. Seasonal variation in the duration of development. 170 e. The trapping methods and species distribution. 191 f. Parasitism. 198 g. Laboratory observations on the burrow fauna. 202 SECTION V. GENTaA.L DISCUSICW. 204-208 S2CTION VI. ,1C11,i0WJA-ii.E1.2S. 209-210 Si]CTION VII. SUAAARY. 211-214 ST:;CTION VIII. 3-113ilIOGAIdY. 215-230 nC2IC-v. IX. PITLT112,12 4 - 56. 231-337 7. 30Tlui- I The Sphaeroceridae are a family of small acalypterate flies (Diptera) with 3 genera and a 10G or so species in Britain. Their larvae are found in a wide variety of organic debris: decaying vegetable matter (such as, compost, seaweed, rotten fungi and the refuse which collects in nests and burrows); dung and sewage; and dead animal matter. The eggs are laid in or on the material, and the adults live in close association with the larval micro-habitats. Richards (1930) gave a comprehensive account of the British species, and subsequent workers have studied the biology of certain groups of Sphaeroceridae, particularly those associated with cow-dung. There are, however, few detailed observations of the life cycles of particular species, and the immature stages (egg,-larvae and puparium) of the majority of British species have not been described. It was the aim ,of this present study to observe and record the life-histories and behaviour 8. of flies under laboratory conditions, and to describe their immature stages; to ascertain the habitat preferences of particular species, with emphasis on those collected from rabbit burrows by a method of "bait-trapping"; and, by the identification of material from suction-trap collections, to find out when particular species were in flight, and to compare, as far as possible, these aerial samples with collections made on the ground. The flies were collected in or around Silwood Park, the field station of Imperial College at Ascot in 3erkshire. The park comprises a 300- acre estate with a variety of habitat situations, including deciduous woodland, rough and mown grass- land, arable land, and a lake and marsh (igure 53). Other collections were made in the vicinity of the conifer plantations at 'fiindsor Great Park, and at badger sets near :?okingham (Berkshire) and at Somerton (Oxfordshire). 9. II LIFE IIITORI,,JS AND HABITAT DATA 1. I).-TO'DUCTIOTT Sphaeroceridae occur in a wide variety of habitats. Richards (1930) has dealt with the habits of the British species, and has given an extensive bibliography concerning the family from all aspects. In this review it is my policy to refer only to those papers published after 1930, except when the content of earlier publications has some definite significance. The literature has been grouped into the following broad categories according' to the habitats from which the flies have been collected or reared. a. ]Vests, burrows and caves (See also Section IV): falcoz (1915) from mole nest (Talpa europaea). Richards (1932a) from wasp's nest. Richards (1950 and 1965) in association with Doryline Ants. NcAtee (1926) from starling's nest. b. Vungi: Tiuther (1946); Smith (1955a, 1956); Austin and Jary (1934); Austin (1937); Vanschuyt- broeck (1942); .-,3uxt!nl (1954) from myxomycete! 10. 0. Seawced: 3acklund (1945)*; (1960 and 1965)*; 7Harrison (1953); Thornley (1930). d. Dung and excrement: Altheir (1938); Coffey (1966)*; Fredeen and Taylor (1964)* ; Hafez (1939a and b, 1947, 1949)*; Hammer (1941)*; Howard (1900); .H.ussey (1957)*; Laurence (1953, 1954, 1955)* ; lions (1943)*; Thomsen and Hammer (1936)*; Wilson and Stoll (1929)*. e. T)ead animals: ftlapman and Sankey (1955); Deeming and Knutson (1966); Harmenter (1952a). Other miscellaneous habitat records are supplied in Harrison (1959); Leclercq (1946b); Lindner (1920); Farmenter (1952a and b, 1954a); Hichards (1944)*; }?.icrds and Ferford (1930)*; and Sabrosky (1958). Aeshovski (1967) and Vanschuytbroeck (1943b) have each given a list of biotopes (in ulcaria and nel6ium respectively) where Sphaeroceridae are found. (3pecific breeding records are supplied by those authors marked with an asterisk). kite history data, with descri-ntions of immature stages are recorded in Godard (1938); Deeming and Knutson (1966); Vogler (1900); Fredeen and Taylor (1964); Guibe (1939); Hammer (1939c); Laurence (1955); Austin (1937) and Avglishaw (1960). 11. The predtor/prey relations of the Sphaero- ceridae have been recorded by various workers: Richards (1930) refers to the observations of a number of authors, and records one parasite rearing. Goddard (193c) identified two ''iymenopteran- parasites bred from puparia. hammer (1941) reared two para- sitic Ichneumons from 3phaerocerid puparia. rarmenter (1954b); Parmenter and Owen (1954b) and -Lack and Owen (1955) discuss the role of the swift (4us alms if.) as a predator of liphaerocerids. The insect enemies of Aphaerocerids which have been recorded include various predatory flies and beetles. Hafez (1947 and 1949) records the effect of preda- tion on dung inhabiting species by two Empidid flies and various Histerid and Etaphylinid beetles; Hobby (1931 and 1933) collected the 4haerocerid prey from the dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria L. TJeclercq (1946a) records scaura L. and 6cato-, C pig; sterco7aria L. preying on L. appendiculata 411. and parapusilla Duda respectively. 1,.ohr (1943) recorded various beetles and parasitoid wasps preying on cattle-dung inhabiting species. Smith (1952) and Thornley (1933) noted predacious .i2mpididae feeding on Sphaerocerids. 12. Ilichards (1930) and Goddard (1938) recorded the presence of various acarines on Sphaerocerid adults. The following authors also make reference to mites on Sphaerocerids: 'f- ughes (1959), Smith (1955), Egglishaw (1966), and Hafez (1949); although whether the mites are parasitic or phoretic in their habits remains unclear. :Hughes (1959) has stated that the mite Uroseius acuminatus has a definite phoretic relation with Sphaerocerids. Records of other parasitic relationships are given by Zwaluwenberg (1928) who removed round worm eggs of Ascaris and Necator from the abdomen of a Borborus species; and Hamer (1941) who noted the presence of a para- sitic fungus on L. lugubris. The information discused here is based on the continuous collection of adult Sphaerocerids from a variety of habitats in Silwood Park from April 1966 until :December 1968 and collections made with suction traps from 1961 - 1965 (See Section HI).
Recommended publications
  • Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) of India

    Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) of India

    Advances in Bioresearch Adv. Biores., Vol 8 (6) November 2017: 04-12 Advances ©2017 Society of Education, India Print ISSN 0976-4585; Online ISSN 2277-1573 in Journal’s URL:http://www.soeagra.com/abr.html CODEN: ABRDC3 DOI: 10.15515/abr.0976-4585.8.6.412 Bioresearch REVIEW ARTICLE A Synoptic Review on the Indian Small Dung Flies (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) of India Bulganin Mitra1, Debajyoti Patra2, Souradip Roy3,6, Olive Biswas4, Sumana Halder5 1 Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, India E-mail: [email protected]. 2Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Vidyasagar College, Kolkata, India. E-mail: [email protected], 3Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Vidyasagar College, Kolkata, India E-mail: [email protected]. 4Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, India E-mail: [email protected]. 5Address: Zoological Survey of India, New Alipore, Kolkata, India E-mail: [email protected],. 6Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected], Contact number: +919477455376 ABSTRACT Altogether, 63 species belonging to 29 genera and 03 subfamilies of lesser dung flies (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) have been reported from India, which is only 4.01% of total global species of Sphaeroceridae. Out of 36 states and UT’s in India, the family Sphaeroceridae is so far known only from 15 states and UT’s and maximum number of species reported from the state of West Bengal (26.98%). Among different biogeographic zones in India, the Indo-Gangetic Plains share maximum number of species (49.20%) whereas, Islands biogeographic zone has no record of these flies. The present communication is the first attempt in documenting the diversity, distribution and gaps in research of the family Sphaeroceridae from India.
  • Southampton French Quarter 1382 Specialist Report Download E9: Mineralised and Waterlogged Fly Pupae, and Other Insects and Arthropods

    Southampton French Quarter 1382 Specialist Report Download E9: Mineralised and Waterlogged Fly Pupae, and Other Insects and Arthropods

    Southampton French Quarter SOU1382 Specialist Report Download E9 Southampton French Quarter 1382 Specialist Report Download E9: Mineralised and waterlogged fly pupae, and other insects and arthropods By David Smith Methods In addition to samples processed specifically for the analysis of insect remains, insect and arthropod remains, particularly mineralised pupae and puparia, were also contained in the material sampled and processed for plant macrofossil analysis. These were sorted out from archaeobotanical flots and heavy residues fractions by Dr. Wendy Smith (Oxford Archaeology) and relevant insect remains were examined under a low-power binocular microscope by Dr. David Smith. The system for ‘intensive scanning’ of faunas as outlined by Kenward et al. (1985) was followed. The Coleoptera (beetles) present were identified by direct comparison to the Gorham and Girling Collections of British Coleoptera. The dipterous (fly) puparia were identified using the drawings in K.G.V. Smith (1973, 1989) and, where possible, by direct comparison to specimens identified by Peter Skidmore. Results The insect and arthropod taxa recovered are listed in Table 1. The taxonomy used for the Coleoptera (beetles) follows that of Lucht (1987). The numbers of individual insects present is estimated using the following scale: + = 1-2 individuals ++ = 2-5 individuals +++ = 5-10 individuals ++++ = 10-20 individuals +++++ = 20- 100individuals +++++++ = more than 100 individuals Discussion The insect and arthropod faunas from these samples were often preserved by mineralisation with any organic material being replaced. This did make the identification of some of the fly pupae, where some external features were missing, problematic. The exceptions to this were samples 108 (from a Post Medieval pit), 143 (from a High Medieval pit) and 146 (from an Anglo-Norman well) where the material was partially preserved by waterlogging.
  • Sphaeroceridae (Diptera) in Burrows of Rabbit and Fox in Central Bohemia (Czech Republic), with Description of a New Species of Minilimosina Roháèek

    Sphaeroceridae (Diptera) in Burrows of Rabbit and Fox in Central Bohemia (Czech Republic), with Description of a New Species of Minilimosina Roháèek

    © Entomologica Fennica. 10 September 2019 Sphaeroceridae (Diptera) in burrows of rabbit and fox in central Bohemia (Czech Republic), with description of a new species of Minilimosina Roháèek Jindøich Roháèek Roháèek, J. 2019: Sphaeroceridae (Diptera) in burrows ofrabbit and foxin cen - tral Bohemia (Czech Republic), with description ofa new species of Minilimo- sina Roháèek. Entomol. Fennica 30: 97113. https://doi.org/10.33338/ ef.84085 The communities ofSphaeroceridae in burrows ofEuropean Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus and Red Fox Vulpes vulpes in central Bohemia (the Czech Republic) are described including number, dominance and constancy ofspecies and com - pared by means ofa similarity index. A total of17 species were recorded from burrows ofrabbit and 9 fromthose offox. Spelobia talparum (Richards, 1927) and S. pseudonivalis (Dahl, 1909) are considered pholeobiont (= eucoenic) and Spelobia czizeki (Duda, 1918) pholeophilous to pholeobiont species in this habi- tat. Comparison ofthese two communities with those recorded fromother mam- mal subterraneous habitats in Europe revealed that most similar are those from the same locality irrespective ofthe host mammal species or the size ofthe bur- row. The species spectrum ofEuropean Sphaeroceridae recorded from mammal burrows is reviewed and discussed. Minilimosina (Minilimosina) speluncana sp. n. is described on males found in rabbit burrow and its relationship and habitat as- sociation are discussed. J. Roháèek, Silesian Museum, Nádraní okruh 31, CZ-746 01 Opava, Czech Re- public. E-mail: [email protected] Received 3 April 2018, accepted 28 June 2018 1. Introduction undoubtedly inhabited by a rich dipterous com- munity, there are very few reliable data because While the communities offlies(Diptera), includ - most, particularly older, studies were mainly de- ing regularly representatives ofthe family voted to beetles (Coleoptera) and the dipterous Sphaeroceridae, have previously been rather of- component was partly or wholly neglected.
  • Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae), an Almost Entirely

    Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae), an Almost Entirely

    A review of the Archiceroptera Papp genus complex (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae) by Steven Mark Paiero A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Steven Mark Paiero, December, 2017 ABSTRACT: A review of the Archiceroptera Papp genus complex (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae: Limosininae) Steven Mark Paiero Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Dr. S.A. Marshall This thesis has two parts. The first part investigates the relationships between the Archiceroptera genus complex and other members of the Limosininae (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae). A focus is placed on the relationships within the larger epandrial process group, which contains Bitheca, Bromeloecia, Pterogramma, Aptilotella, and Robustagramma, along with Archiceroptera, Rudolfina and several previously unplaced species groups. Molecular and morphological data sets provide the first phylogeny of the group, and were used to support the inclusion of several unplaced species groups within Rudolfina and Archiceroptera, while one new genus is described. Pectinosina gen. nov. includes two species: P. prominens (Duda), previously placed in Rudolfina, and P. carro n. sp. The second part of the thesis deals with revisions of Archiceroptera Papp and Rudolfina Roháček. Rudolfina now includes 13 described species, nine of which are newly described here (R. bucki, R. exuberata, R. howdeni, R. megepandria, R. pauca, R. pilosa, R. newtoni, R. remiforma, and R. tumida). Archiceroptera now includes 29 species, of which 27 are newly described here (A. adamas, A. addenda, A. barberi, A. basilia, A. bilobata, A. bisetosus, A. braziliensis, A. brevivilla, A. browni, A. caliga, A. calligraphia, A. cobolorum, A.
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
  • Downloaded from Avoided Because the Sampling Was Not Standardized and BOLD Online Database and Included in the Phylogenetic Designed for This Purpose

    Downloaded from Avoided Because the Sampling Was Not Standardized and BOLD Online Database and Included in the Phylogenetic Designed for This Purpose

    Giordani and Vanin Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences (2020) 10:13 Egyptian Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-020-00187-2 Forensic Sciences ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Description of the puparium and other notes on the morphological and molecular identification of Phthitia empirica (Diptera, Sphaeroceridae) collected from animal carcasses G. Giordani1,2 and S. Vanin1,3* Abstract Background: A correct identification of species is fundamental in order to derive all the biological, ecological, and behavioral information useful to reconstruct previous events when insects are used in forensic and funerary archaeological contexts. Little attention was paid in the past to the description of the immature stages of flies, especially of species belonging to family found only occasionally on human cadavers and animal carrion. Sphaeroceridae species belong to this category. Results: In this work, adult and puparia of Phthitia empirica (Hutton, 1901) are illustrated and described. In addition, some observations about the molecular identification of this species are presented and discussed. Conclusions: This work will allow the identification of puparia of this species providing additional tools in forensic entomological investigation. More in general, the effort of producing morphological descriptions and molecular information of species of potential forensic interest clearly implements the possibility to provide a deeper understanding of the peri- and post-mortem events in violent crimes. Keywords: Forensic entomology, Funerary archaeoentomology,
  • Insect Introductions and Late Holocene Environments

    Insect Introductions and Late Holocene Environments

    Edinburgh Research Explorer A thousand bites: Insect introductions and late Holocene environments Citation for published version: Panagiotakopulu, E & Buckland, PC 2017, 'A thousand bites: Insect introductions and late Holocene environments', Quaternary Science Reviews, vol. 156, pp. 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.11.014 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.11.014 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Quaternary Science Reviews Publisher Rights Statement: © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 08. Oct. 2021 Quaternary Science Reviews 156 (2017) 23e35 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev A thousand bites e Insect introductions and late Holocene environments * Eva Panagiotakopulu a, , Paul C. Buckland b a School of Geociences, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK b 20 Den Bank Close, S10 5PA, Sheffield, UK article info abstract Article history: The impact of insect species directly associated with man-made habitats and human dispersal has been, Received 3 September 2016 and remains globally significant.
  • Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), Including All American Species Previously Placed in Borborillus

    Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), Including All American Species Previously Placed in Borborillus

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 1992 A revision of the New World species of Norrbomia (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), including all American species previously placed in Borborillus Stephen A. Marshall Ontario, Canada Allen L. Norrbom Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Marshall, Stephen A. and Norrbom, Allen L., "A revision of the New World species of Norrbomia (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), including all American species previously placed in Borborillus" (1992). Insecta Mundi. 442. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/442 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 6, No. 3-4, September - December, 1992 151 A revision of the New World species of Norrbomia (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), including all American species previously placed in Borborillus Stephen A. Marshall Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1 and Allen L. Norrbom Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, c/o National Museum of Natural History, NHB 168, Washington, D.C. 20560 Abstract The New World species formerly placed in Borborillus Duda (Sphaeroceridae: Copromyzinae) are trans- femdtoNorrbomiaPapp. These are: N. lacteipennis(Malloch),n. comb., N. fimipennis(Stenhammar),n. comb., N. frigipnnis (Spuler), n. comb., N. scripta (Malloch), n. comb., and N. somlida (Zetteretedt). Norrbomia filvipnnis, N. singuata, N. mexicana, N.
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report

    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report

    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
  • World Catalog of Sphaeroceridae

    World Catalog of Sphaeroceridae

    Catalog - Homalomitrinae 109 Subfamily HOMALOMITRINAE HOMALOMITRINAE Roháček & Marshall, 1998a: 457. Type genus: Homalomitra Borgmeier, 1931, original designation. - Roháček & Marshall, 1998a: 457-491 [diagnosis, revision of world genera and species, key, phylogeny, illustr.]. Genus Homalomitra Borgmeier, 1931 Homalomitra Borgmeier, 1931: 32 (feminine). Type species: Homalomitra ecitonis Borgmeier, 1931, original designation. - Borgmeier, 1931: 30-37 [diagnosis, illustr.]; Richards, 1967b: 6 [Neotropical catalog]; Hackman, 1969a: 198, 207 [phylogenetic notes, biogeography]; Mourgués-Schurter, 1987a: 113 [diagnosis, illustr.]; Roháček & Marshall, 1998a: 458-463 [redescription, key to world species, illustr.]. Homalomitra albuquerquei Mourgués-Schurter, 1987. Distr.: Neotropical: Costa Rica. Homalomitra albuquerquei Mourgués-Schurter, 1987a: 116 [male, taxonomic notes, illustr.]. Type locality: Costa Rica. HT male (MZSP). - Roháček & Marshall, 1998a: 477-479 [redescription, phylogeny, key, illustr.]. Homalomitra antiqua Roháček & Marshall, 1998. Distr.: Neotropical: Brazil, Costa Rica. Homalomitra antiqua Roháček & Marshall, 1998a: 463 [both sexes, phylogeny, key, illsutr.]. Type locality: Costa Rica, San José, Zurquí de Moravia [1,600 m]. HT male (DEBU). Homalomitra ecitonis Borgmeier, 1931. Distr.: Neotropical: Brazil. Homalomitra ecitonis Borgmeier, 1931: 32 [female, illustr.]. Type locality: Brazil, Goyaz (= Goiás), Campinas. HT female (USNM, some parts in MZSP). - Richards, 1967b: 6 [Neotropical catalog]; Mourgués-Schurter, 1987a:
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation

    . JVASV^iX ^ N^ {/) lSNrNVIN0SHilWS*^S3ldVaan^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni <n - M ^^ <n 5 CO Z ^ ^ 2 ^—^ _j 2 -I RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVdan U r- ^ ^ 2 CD 4 A'^iitfwN r: > — w ? _ ISNI NVINOSHilWS SBiyVdan LIBRARIES'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION f^ <rt .... CO 2 2 2 s;- W to 2 C/J • 2 CO *^ 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS S3liiVyan_L; iiSNi"^NViNOSHiiNS S3iyvaan libraries smithsonian'^institution i^ 33 . z I/' ^ ^ (^ RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3lbVHan Li CO — -- — "> — IISNI NVINOSHimS S3IMVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION N' 2 -J 2 _j 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIifllliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSIMVyail L! MOTITI IT I f\t _NviN0SHiiws'^S3iMvaan libraries'^smithsonian^institution NOlin z \ '^ ^—s^ 5 <^ ^ ^ ^ '^ - /^w\ ^ /^^\ - ^^ ^ /^rf^\ - /^ o ^^^ — x.ii:i2Ji^ o ??'^ — \ii Z ^^^^^""-^ o ^^^^^ -» 2 _J Z -J , ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIXniliSNI NVINOSHillMS $3 I M VH 8 !!_ LI BR = C/> ± O) ^. ? CO I NVINOSHimS S3iaVHan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIlf CO ..-. CO 2 Z z . o .3 :/.^ C/)o Z u. ^^^ i to Z CO • z to * z > SMITHS0NIAN_1NSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHimS S3 I d ViJ 8 n_LI B R UJ i"'NViNOSHiiws S3ibvyan libraries smithsonian"^institution Noiir r~ > z r- Z r- 2: . CO . ^ ^ ^ ^ ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SSiyVMail LI BR CO . •» Z r, <^ 2 z 5 ^^4ii?^^ ^' X^W o ^"^- x life ^<ji; o ^'f;0: i >^ _NVIN0SHiIlMs'^S3iyVdan^LIBRARIEs'^SMITHS0NlAN INSTITUTION NOlif Z \ ^'^ ^-rr-^ 5 CO n CO CO o z > SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I ^Vd 8 11 LI BR >" _ . z 3 ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. SOKOLOFF fre s Assistant Editors J.A.
  • Matile L. Encyclopedia Biospeologica Diptera

    Matile L. Encyclopedia Biospeologica Diptera

    ENCYCLOPAEDIA BIOSPEOLOGICA TOME 1 Christian Juberthie et Vasile Decu éditeurs Société de Biospéologie Moulis (C.N.R.S.) - Bucarest (ACADEMIE ROUMAINE) DIPTERA par Loïc MATILE* ~ 1 1 • GENERALITES Les Diptères sont des insectes holométaboles caractérisés par la présence d'une seule paire d'ailes, mésothoraciques, et d'une paire de balanciers, métathoraciques. Les pièces buccales sont du type piqueur ou lécheur-suceur. Le prothorax et le métathorax sont réduits par rapport au mésothorax, énormément développé. Les tarses possèdent cinq articles. Ces trois derniers caractères permettront de reconnaître les fonnes aptères. Les larves sont dépourvues de pattes thora­ ciques articulées; elles sont eucéphales, hémicéphales ou acéphales (asticots). Elles peuvent se distinguer des autres larves apodes d'insectes par leur corps allongé, helminthoïde, et leurs déplacements actifs et dirigés. Les Diptères ont longtemps été divisés en deux sous-ordres, Nématocères et Brachycères. Chez les Nématocères, les antennes sont généralement aussi longues ou plus longues que la tête et le thorax réunis; le flagelle est composé d'au moins quatre flagellomères librement articulés; les palpes maxil­ laires sont le plus souvent longs et formés d'au moins trois articles. Les Brachycères ont les antennes plus courtes, le flagelle est composé d'un seul flagel­ lomère, parfois divisé en segments fixes, soudés les uns aux autres; les palpes maxillaires, courts, Il'ont pas plus de deux articles. Une classification plus moderne prend en compte le mode d'ouverture de l'enveloppe nymphale, en T sur le tégument même de la nymphe chez les Orthorrhaphes, en demi-cercle sur le puparium (dernière exuvie larvaire enveloppant la nymphe) chez Fig.