Impacting Healthcare a Conference Hosted By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impacting Healthcare a Conference Hosted By Personalized Medicine: Impacting Healthcare A Conference Hosted By November 17-18, 2010 Joseph B. Martin Conference Center at Harvard Medical School, Boston 6th Annual Conference CONFERENCE PROGRAM www.personalizedmedicineconference.org HIGHLIGHTS FROM PAST CONFERENCES November 17, 2010 Dear Colleague, Welcome to the 2010 Personalized Medicine Conference. We and the other members of the Conference Organizing Committee, whose names you will see on the last page of this program, are pleased to offer this sixth annual gathering co-hosted by Partners HealthCare, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Business School. We offer our profound thanks to the speakers, the panelists, the staff and our generous sponsors for their essential contributions. This is a time of active and vigorous conversation at many different levels about the state and future of healthcare. Invariably, those conversations recognize the extraordinary advances in knowledge and technological resources that have taken place in recent years. They also recognize the enticing opportunities for medical practice to implement the principles of personalized medicine into routine practice. Many examples can be cited in which those opportunities have been realized and are being applied daily. At the same time, there are those who contend that personalized medicine is a concept whose aspiration may far exceed its ultimate reality. In the context of those differing opinions the annual Personalized Medicine Conference seeks to engage a diverse audience of national and international thought leaders in discussions that will advance the understanding of and commitment to how the promise of personalized medicine is being and may be further fulfilled. As you will see from this year’s program, we have sought to give attention both to accomplishments that have been made and to challenges to be overcome. We invite your active participation in these discussions. We are pleased to have our ongoing collaboration with the Personalized Medicine Coalition whose help brings added value in organizing and presenting the meeting. Sincerely, Scott T. Weiss, M.D., M.S. Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D Scientific Director, Paul C. Cabot Professor of Genetics and Partners HealthCare Center for Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Personalized Genetic Medicine; Chair, Conference Organizing Committee Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School 3 Thanks to Our Sponsors This conference is organized by the Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine and Harvard Business School in collaboration with the Personalized Medicine Coalition. It is made possible by the generous support of our sponsors. SIGNATURE PLATINUM GOLD 4 SILVER BRONZE CONTRIBUTING SPONSOR 5 Conference Program Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:15 a.m. Registration & Continental Breakfast 8:15 a.m. Welcome Raju Kucherlapati, Ph.D. Paul C. Cabot Professor of Genetics, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Opening Remarks Scott Weiss, M.D., M.S. Scientific Director, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Associate Director, Channing Laboratory, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Elizabeth G. Nabel, M.D. President, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Faulkner Hospital 9:00 a.m. Keynote: A Pharmaceutical Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D. Perspective President, Worldwide Research & Development, Pfizer Introducer: Deborah Dunsire, M.D. President & CEO, Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company 9:30 a.m. Networking Break 10:15 a.m. Panel: The Cost and Value Moderator: Gregory J. Downing, D.O., Ph.D. of Personalized Medicine Senior Advisor & Director, Personalized Health Care Initiative, U.S. in the Era of Reform Department of Health and Human Services Introducer: Felix Frueh, Ph.D. VP, Personalized Medicine Research & Development, Medco Health Solutions Jane Barlow, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. VP, Medical Strategy & Precision Health Solutions, Medco Health Solutions Sharon Levine, M.D. Associate Executive Director, Permanente Medical Group Arnold Milstein, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical Director, Pacific Business Group on Health David Parker, Ph.D. VP, Boston Healthcare 11:20 a.m. Presentation of William S. Dalton, Ph.D., M.D. Personalized Medicine President, CEO & Center Director, Moffitt Cancer Center Coalition’s Sixth Annual Award for Leadership in Presentation: Edward Abrahams, Ph.D. Personalized Medicine President, Personalized Medicine Coalition 11:50 a.m. Luncheon 1:05 p.m. Debate: Patenting Gene Moderator: Carolyn Johnson Tests: Judge Robert Science Writer, The Boston Globe Sweet’s Decision Introducer: Kathy Giusti Association for Molecular Founder & CEO, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Pathology, et al. v. United States Patent and Trademark Attorney for the Plaintiffs: Office, et al. Christopher A. Hansen, Esq., Staff Attorney, ACLU Attorney for the Defendants: Jennifer Gordon, Ph.D., J.D. , Partner, Baker Botts LLP 6 Conference Program Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:50 p.m. Keynote: An International Charles Swanton, Ph.D. Perspective Head, Translational Cancer Therapeutics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute Introducer: Nicholas Galakatos, Ph.D., Managing Director, Clarus Ventures 2:20 p.m. Panel: Implementation of Moderator: M. Kathleen Behrens Wilsey, Ph.D. Personalized Medicine in Founder, KEW Group Diverse Sectors Introducer: Heidi L. Rehm, Ph.D., FACMG Laboratory Director, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Center for Personalized Genetic Medicine, Assistant Professor of Pathology, Harvard Medical School Mark S. Boguski, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Michael Bristow, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Chief Executive Officer & President, ARCA biopharma Bruce Johnson, M.D. Director, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Clay Marsh, M.D. Senior Associate Vice President for Health Sciences Research, Vice Dean of Research, College of Medicine, Professor of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University 3:25 p.m. Networking Break 3:55 p.m. Panel: Molecular Moderator: Sue Siegel Diagnostics: From Partner, Mohr, Davidow Ventures Technologies to Treatments Introducer: Robert Tepper, M.D., Partner, Third Rock Ventures William Hagstrom CEO, Crescendo Bioscience K. Peter Hirth, Ph.D. Founder & CEO, Plexxikon Ryan Phelan Founder & President, DNA Direct Mark Stevenson President & CEO, Life Technologies 5:00 p.m. Keynote: An International Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz, M.D., Ph.D. Perspective Head of Pharmacology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Coordinator, Brazilian National Pharmacogenomics Network Introducer: Lawrence J. Lesko, Ph.D., F.C.P. Director, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration 5:30-7:00 p.m. Reception at Elements Café 7 Conference Program Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:15 a.m. Registration & Continental Breakfast 8:15 a.m. Perspectives from The U.S. Anna Barker, Ph.D. Department of Health and Former Deputy Director, National Cancer Institute; Deputy Human Services Director for Strategic Scientific Initiatives; Private Consultant Lawrence J. Lesko, Ph.D., F.C.P. Director, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Introducer: Kristin Ciriello Pothier Vice President, Health Advances 8:55 a.m. Panel: Information Technology Moderator: Neil de Crescenzo Solutions Senior Vice President and General Manager for Health Sciences, Oracle Corp. Introducer: Richard A. Mandahl Vice President, Business Development, UNIConnect David Hickey Executive Vice President, Central Laboratory, Global Research & Development, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Joseph M. Jasinski, Ph.D. IBM Distinguished Engineer, Global Industry Executive, Smarter Healthcare and Life Sciences, IBM Research Emad Rizk, M.D. President, McKesson Health Solutions 10:00 a.m. Keynote: A Perspective from an William Chin, M.D. Academic Medical Center Executive Dean for Research, Harvard Medical School Introducer: Per G. H. Lofberg Executive Vice President, CVS Caremark, President, Caremark Pharmacy Services 10:30 a.m. Networking Break 10:55 a.m. Radio Broadcast: On Point Facilitator: Edward Abrahams, Ph.D. with Tom Ashbrook (off-site) President, Personalized Medicine Coalition Host: Tom Ashbrook Host & Managing Editor, On Point, WBUR, National Public Radio Guest: Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. Commissioner of Food and Drugs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (invited) 12:00 p.m. Bag Lunch 8 Conference Program Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:30 p.m. Keynote: FDA Perspective on Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. Personalized Medicine Commissioner of Food and Drugs, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (invited) 1:00 p.m. National Legislative Efforts Sheila Walcoff Partner, McDermott Will & Emery Risa Stack, Ph.D. Partner, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Introducer: Gerald McDougall Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers 1:30 p.m. Briefings: Investments in Christopher-Paul Milne, D.V.M., M.P.H., J.D. Personalized Medicine Associate Director, Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University Sara Radcliffe Executive Vice President for Health, Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Introducer: Jeffrey Elton, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer, KEW Group 2:15 p.m. Interactive Case Studies on Moderators: Business Strategies for Richard Hamermesh, D.B.A. Personalized
Recommended publications
  • Experimental and Computational Requirements for Post-Genomic Integrative Cellular Physiology John Wikswo
    VANDERBILT INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION (VIIBRE) Experimental and Computational Requirements for Post-Genomic Integrative Cellular Physiology John Wikswo Instrumenting and the Single Cell Controlling 1 Topics • The advantages of micro/nanoscale instruments • Cellular complexity • The need for closed-loop control • How to identify early manifestations of disease – Modeling – Interactive, dynamical analysis – Mining dynamics data 2 Topics • The advantages of micro/nanoscale instruments • Cellular complexity • The need for closed-loop control • How to identify early manifestations of disease – Modeling – Interactive, dynamical analysis – Mining dynamics data 3 Reductionism in Science Thermodynamics Bulk solids Anatomy Statistical Devices Physiology mechanics Continuum Organ Molecular/atomic models dynamics Cell Microscopic Electrodynamics models Protein Quantum Atomic physics Genome Chromodynamics 4 Historical Evolution of Spatial Resolution in Biology and Physiology 3000 • Genomics Molecular Physiology Biology Cell 2000 –Structural Molecule Cell genomics 1000 X-Ray / SEM / STM … Optical microscope 0 • Proteomics Tissue –Structural -1000 Magnifying glass proteomics -2000 –Functional HistoricalYears Time, proteomics Unaided eye AnimalAnimal -3000 … • What is next? 10-9 10-6 10-3 100 Resolution, Meters 5 TheThe raterate atat whichwhich DNADNA sequencessequences beganbegan accumulatingaccumulating waswas exponentialexponential 14,000,000 ~13 million 12,000,000 sequence entries 10,000,000 in GenBank 8,000,000 Nearly 13 billion 6,000,000 bases from Human Genome Rapid DNA 4,000,000 Project begun ~50,000 species sequencing invented 2,000,000 GB 0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2001 Year National Library of Medicine Courtesy of Mark Boguski 6 Hypotheses I and II I. The explosion in genomic and proteomic knowledge and measurement techniques will revolutionize the early detection of diseases II.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing and Emerging Information Technologies That Affect Genomic Data Sharing
    Existing and Emerging Information Technologies that Affect Genomic Data Sharing Joyce A. Mitchell, PhD Associate Vice President, Health Sciences IT Professor and Chair, Dept of Biomedical Informatics University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT Genomics • You know a lot about Genomics – Human Genome Project complete in 2003 25,000 genes, perhaps 1,000,000 proteins – HapMap completed in 2005 More than 1 million SNPs – Now over 5000 genomes available online – Incredible information is available online Public data repositories are routine 2 Genomics (cont) – Almost 1900 specific genetic tests available – 1 million SNP chip studies are routine – GWAS studies are rapidly expanding knowledge (looking for G2P associations) – Gene expression studies are impacting clinical care Gene function can be measured and used diagnostically – Next Generation Sequencing has arrived. Avg variant file for a complete human sequence is 3.1 – 4.5 M SNPs, and about 10% more for INDELs, etc. Science 2009. 19892942 3 Consumer Demand for Genetics Information is Exploding! What is the GHR? http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ • An information system focusing on the health implications of research arising from the Human Genome Project – Targets the public – Bridges consumer health information and bioinformatics data – Links to existing resources (NLM and other) 5 6 Genetics Home Reference statistics • 500 health conditions • 700 curated + 1800 auto- generated gene summaries • 215 million hits per year As of 11-2009 7 Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing A huge force for changing the
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Dots
    © 1999 Nature America Inc. • http://genetics.nature.com editorial volume 23 no. 3 november 1999 Connecting the dots As expressed by Francis Collins (director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)) in The Chipping Forecast1, it is too early to predict the ultimate impact of microarrays on our understanding of biology, and genetics in particular. Data presented at a recent Nature Genetics conference* indicate that estimates of impact and rate of progress should not be conservative. Two previous microarray meetings2 focused more heavily on technological aspects. Whereas aspects of the technology received some airtime at this year’s meeting, the substan- http://genetics.nature.com • tive nature of presentations that focused on biological questions indicates that the field, such as it is, is advancing quickly. Abstracts of oral and poster presentations are freely available (http://genetics.nature.com/microarray). Comprehensive analysis in yeast. The most extensive array analyses have been carried out in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where approximately 250 sequence-spe- cific regulators interact with at least 100 components of the transcription appara- tus to effect the expression of over 6000 genes3. The hope is that microarray analysis will permit a detailed understanding of the transcriptional pathways that Carina Dennis 1999 Nature America Inc. © underlie cellular metabolism. From the data to hand, it is clear that gene expres- Mark Boguski scans the horizon. sion patterns are clustered; groups of genes are expressed in similar patterns throughout the cell cycle and under a variety of environmental conditions. The hypothesis that these genes are co-regulated at the transcriptional level is corrobo- rated by a growing number of studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics in Medical Science: an Overview
    Article ID: WMC002580 2046-1690 Genomics in Medical Science: An Overview Corresponding Author: Mr. Robby Kumar, Lecturer, SSR Medical College, Mauritius - Mauritius Submitting Author: Mr. Robby Kumar, Lecturer, SSR Medical College, Mauritius - Mauritius Article ID: WMC002580 Article Type: Review articles Submitted on:04-Dec-2011, 08:33:21 PM GMT Published on: 05-Dec-2011, 08:44:24 AM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/2580 Subject Categories:BIOTECHNOLOGY Keywords:Genomics, Epigenomics, Toxicogenomics, Proteomics, MicroRNomics, Pharmacogenomics How to cite the article:Kumar R . Genomics in Medical Science: An Overview . WebmedCentral BIOTECHNOLOGY 2011;2(12):WMC002580 Source(s) of Funding: None Competing Interests: None Webmedcentral > Review articles Page 1 of 12 WMC002580 Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 16-Dec-2011, 12:22:28 PM Genomics in Medical Science: An Overview Author(s): Kumar R Abstract infectious diseases. This is clearly illustrated during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2002–2003 and the emergence and worldwide spread of the pandemic H1N1 2009 Genomics is the study of an organism's genome and influenza virus this year. In both cases, genomics the use of the genes. It deals with the systematic use played a key role in the immediate response to the of genome information, associated with other data, to outbreak. Initially, very little was known about the virus provide answers in biology, medicine, and industry. responsible for the SARS outbreak. Pangenomic virus Genomics has the potential of offering new therapeutic microarrays identified it as a coronavirus (6); however, methods for the treatment of some diseases, as well it was only through detailed sequencing that the as new diagnostic methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Clinical CYP2C19 Genotyping Allele Selection: a Report of the Association For
    ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Recommendations for Clinical CYP2C19 Genotyping Allele Selection: A Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology Short running title: CYP2C19 Allele Testing Recommendations Victoria M. Pratt,*† Andria L. Del Tredici,*‡ Houda Hachad,*§ Yuan Ji,*¶ Lisa V. Kalman,*ǁ Stuart A. Scott,*,**†† Karen E. Weck*‡‡ From the Pharmacogenomics (AMP PGx) Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee* , Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), Bethesda, Maryland; the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics,† Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Millennium Health,‡ LLC, San Diego, California; Translational Software,§ Bellevue, Washington; the Department of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories,¶ University of Utah School of Medicine,MANUSCRIPT Salt Lake City, Utah; the Division of Laboratory Systems,ǁ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Laboratory Systems, Atlanta, Georgia; the Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences,** Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Sema4, a Mount Sinai venture,†† Stamford, Connecticut; and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Genetics,‡‡ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC The AMP 2016 and 2017 Clinical Practice Committee consisted of Marina N. Nikiforova (2016 Chair), Antonia R. SepulvedaACCEPTED (2017 Chair), Monica J. Basehore, Mark Boguski, Susan Butler-Wu, Jennifer Crow, Linda Cook, Birgit Funke, Alex Greninger, Meera R. Hameed, Lawrence J. Jennings, Arivarasan Karunamurthy, Keyur Patel, Jess Friedrich Peterson, Benjamin Pinsky, Somak Roy, Mark J. Routbort, Kandelaria Rumilla, Ryan Schmidt, and David S. Viswanatha. ___________________________________________________________________ This is the author's manuscript of the article published in final edited form as: Pratt, V. M., Del Tredici, A. L., Hachad, H., Ji, Y., Kalman, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficiency of Shared-Memory Multiprocessors for a Genetic Sequence Similarity Search Algorithm
    Technical Report Department of Computer Science University of Minnesota 4-192 EECS Building 200 Union Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55455-0159 USA TR 97-005 Efficiency of Shared-Memory Multiprocessors for a Genetic Sequence Similarity Search Algorithm by: Ed Huai-hsin Chi, Elizabeth Shoop, John Carlis, Ernest Retzel, and John Riedl Efficiency of Shared-Memory Multiprocessors for a Genetic Sequence Similarity Search Algorithm Ed Huai-hsin Chit, Elizabeth Shoop t, John Carlist, Ernest Retzelt, John Riedlt t Computer Science Department, t Computational Biology Centers. University of Minnesota Medical School. University of Minnesota 4-192 EE/CSci Building, Box 196. UMHC. 1460 Mayo Building, Minneapolis. MN 55455 420 Delaware Street S.E., [email protected] Minneapolis, MN 55455 January 3, 1997-Version #1 Abstract Molecular biologists who conduct large-scale genetic sequencing project5 are producing an ever-increa5ing amount of sequence data. GenBank, the primary repository for DNA sequence data, is doubling in size every 1.3 years. Keeping pace with the analysis of these data is a difficult task. One of the most successful technique, for analyzing genetic data is sequence similarity analysis-U1e comparison of unknown sequences against known ,equences kept in databases. As biologists gather more sequence data, sequence similarity algorithms are more and more useful, but take longer and longer to run. BLAST is one of the most popular sequence similarity algorithms in me today, but its running time is approximately proportional to the size of the database. Sequence similarity analysis using BLAST is becoming a bottleneck in genetic sequence analysis. This paper analyzes the performance of BLAST on SMPs, to improve our theoretical and practical understanding of the scalability of the algorithm.
    [Show full text]
  • World Magazine Bio IT
    Å Previous Page | Contents | Zoom In | Zoom Out | Front Cover | Search Issue | Subscribe | Next Page Å FORWARD THIS ISSUE TO A COLLEAGUE SUBSCRIBE TO BIO•IT WORLD MAGAZINE Welcome to your complimentary digital edition of BiolIT World magazine We encourage you to evaluate this issue, share it with your team, and apply for your free professional subscription to request regular delivery. Subscribe. We are genuinely excited about the prospects for this field and the magazine in the coming year. ¯ ¯ We've cemented our position as the flagship publication of Cambridge Healthtech Institute (CHI), and will continue to play a prominent role in hosting and reporting on the best CHI conference throughout the year. We pride ourselves on publishing critical insights and analysis of innovations across the drug discovery pipeline from molecular modeling of popular drug targets to biomarkers that discriminate ¯¯ cancer responders, and from data handling for next-generation sequencing to new strategies for increasing the speed and efficiency of clinical trials. We will work hard to surpass those stories in the coming year, continuing our pursuit of the most critical tools and strategies that epitomize the world of “predictive biology.” We look forward to welcoming you as a subscriber, and hope to engage you with our editorial content, and within our network. NAVIGATION KEY Previous/Next Page: mouse click (or keyboard) on left/right arrows to turn page Contents: takes you to the Table of Contents page To Zoom: In the browser version, simply click on the page to zoom in, and again to zoom out; in the enhanced PDF, use the zoom in/zoom out buttons in the top or bottom tool bar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Written-Description Requirement Protects the Human Genome from Overly-Broad Patents, 32 J
    UIC Law Review Volume 32 Issue 3 Article 8 Spring 1999 It's a Wonderful Genome: The Written-Description Requirement Protects the Human Genome from Overly-Broad Patents, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 805 (1999) Emanuel Vacchiano Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Food and Drug Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Emanuel Vacchiano, It's a Wonderful Genome: The Written-Description Requirement Protects the Human Genome from Overly-Broad Patents, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 805 (1999) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol32/iss3/8 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IT'S A WONDERFUL GENOME: THE WRITTEN-DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT PROTECTS THE HUMAN GENOME FROM OVERLY-BROAD PATENTS1 EMANUEL VACCHIANO* INTRODUCTION George Bailey of Bedford Falls, New York, made it to college after all!2 In fact, Doctor Bailey embarked on a great adventure, joining thousands of others who are crossing a vast, unknown sea attempting to discover its hidden secrets which may reveal the cures to many of today's most deadly diseases.3 Fortunately, George did not leave Bedford Falls for his adventure. For this adventure is the Human Genome Project and the modern-day explorers are scientists like Dr. Bailey, who received his Ph.D. from the State University and set up a research lab in Bedford 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The NIH Catalyst from the Deputy Director for Intramural Research
    Fostering Communication and Collaboration The nihCatalyst A Publication for NIH Intramural Scientists National Institutes of Health a Office of the Director Volume 3, Issue 5 September-October 1995 Tenure Panel Intersecting Orbits: Gets First-Year NIH and NASA’s Joint Explorations Report Card by Celia Hooper by Rebecca Kolberg IH’s new Central Tenure Com- uter space may remain far Currently, two NIH labs —one at mittee recently completed its beyond NIH’s scientific reach NICHD and one at NEI—are weighing N first year of life—and the first O for quite some time, but some the potential applications of NASA- data on tenure decisions are in, along intramural researchers are taking advan- developed technologies in basic with mixed reactions from the scien- tage of the next best research. >• biomedical tists that the group evaluates and thing—a chance to | Not only do the two serves. explore the earth- projects tackle quite “We haven’t lived with the new | bound applications of 3 different scientific tenuring system long enough to see if technology designed problems, but they it produces a better product” than the for the final frontier. also diverge in the old system, says Mark Boguski, a NLM “The nice thing nature of the devices investigator recently tenured by the about working with being tested and in NIH is that the rest of the formality of their the scientific commu- arrangements with the nity looks to NIH for federal space agency. guidance, and if use- NICHD’s evaluation of ful results are reported NASA’s bioreactor for by NIH researchers, three-dimensional tis- the technology starts sue culture is a five- to spread,” says year, $4.8 million Stephen Davison, a interagency agree- biotech program man- ment.
    [Show full text]
  • 08001 Prelim Prog for Print.Qxp
    The content in this document was updated on June 13. For the most up-to-date information, CLICK HERE. Boston, Massachusetts Annual Meeting TH Boston Convention & 44 Exhibition Center June 22-26, 2008 PROGRAM CHAIRPERSON Jeffrey W. Sherman, MD, FACP IDM Pharma, Inc. Program Chairperson Boston – The City of Firsts As our nation’s oldest major city, Boston is home to the first: • University Medical Firsts: • Public school • First time ether was used as an anesthetic during an • Public Health operation at Massachusetts Commission General Hospital in 1846 • Subway station • First kidney transplant performed in 1954 • Free library • First pediatric open heart • Paid fire and police surgery performed at departments Children's Hospital in 1967 Jeffrey (Jeff) W. Sherman, MD, FACP, Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President of Research & Development, IDM Pharma, Inc. Before joining IDM Pharma, Jeff was Vice President of Clinical Science at Takeda Global Research and Development. He has also worked as the Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President at NeoPharm, Inc. He has also held positions at Searle/Pharmacia Research and Development, including Director, Senior Director, and Executive Director of Clinical Research. There he managed clinical development activities for a variety of therapeutic areas, including infectious diseases, women’s health, sleep, and central nervous system. Jeff went on to lead company-wide oncology clinical research as Executive Director, Clinical Research and then oncology medical marketing as Head, Oncology Global Medical Operations. Prior to joining Searle/Pharmacia, Jeff worked at Bristol-Myers Squibb in clinical pharma- cology and clinical research. Jeff received his MD from Rosalind Franklin University/Chicago Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Complete Cdna Sequencing
    Workshop on Complete cDNA Sequencing Gaithersburg, MD May 19, 1997 Participants and Photo In the fall of 1996, several research teams worldwide announced plans for complete sequencing of cDNAs, the sturdy representatives of the cell's fragile messenger RNAs (mRNAs) for gene expression. A workshop for participants in the international Integrated Molecular Analysis of Genome Expression (I.M.A.G.E.) consortium [http://image.llnl.gov/] [HGN 6(6), 3] was called to extend the highly beneficial infrastructure I.M.A.G.E. has provided since 1994 to the challenges of complete cDNA sequencing. The meeting was organized and chaired by Greg Lennon of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), with Marvin Stodolsky coordinating for the meeting sponsor, the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Scientists attended from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States. Several participants are members of the subgroup EURO-IMAGE, whose goals include generating and sequencing a master set of unique full-length cDNA clones (based on I.M.A.G.E. consortium resources) representing 3000 transcripts and 6 Mb of finished sequence, obtaining high resolution and comparative functional mapping in human and model organisms of 1000 genes from the master set, and developing the I.M.A.G.E. consortium data base for easy access to an integrated view of the sequence, map, and expression data generated. Agencies providing funds for cDNA efforts were represented at the workshop and include DOE, NIH, and the recently established non-profit Merck Genome Research Institute (MGRI) [HGN 8 (3-4, 9)]. Selected highlights follow of technical progress in complete cDNA sequencing, as reported by several workshop participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Information Retrieval for Large-Scale Gene Analysis
    From: ISMB-00 Proceedings. Copyright © 2000, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. Genes, Themes and Microarrays Using Information Retrieval for Large-Scale Gene Analysis Hagit Shatkay Stephen Edwards W. John Wilbur Mark Boguski National Center for Biotechnology Information NLM, NIH Bethesda, Maryland 20984 {shatkay,edwards}@ncbi, nlm. nih.gov Abstract 1. Genes that are functionally related may demonstrate The immensevolume of data resulting from DNAmi- strong anti-correlation in their expression levels, (a croarray experiments, accompaniedby an increase in gene may be strongly suppressed to allow another to the numberof publications discussing gene-related dis- be expressed), thus clustered into separate groups, coveries, presents a majordata analysis challenge. Cur- blurring the relationship between them. rent methods for genome-wideanalysis of expression As shown later, simultaneously expressed genes do data typically rely on cluster analysis of gene expres- 2. sion patterns. Clustering indeed reveals potentially not always share a function. Moreover, genes that are meaningful relationships amonggenes, but can not expressed at different times mayserve complementing explain the underlying biological mechanisms. In an roles of one unifying function. attempt to address this problem, we have developed 3. Even when similar expression levels correspond to a new approach for utilizing the literature in order similar functions, the function and the relationships to establish functional relationships amonggenes on a genome-wide scale. Our method is based on re- between genes in the same cluster can not be deter- vealing coherent themeswithin the literature, using a mined from the cluster data alone. Testing, justify- similarity-based search in documentspace. Content- ing, and explaining the formed clusters requires a lot based relationships amongabstracts are then trans- of additional research effort.
    [Show full text]