Comparison of the Nominal Grouping and Sequenced Brainstorming Techniquesof Creative Idea Generation: a Field Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1976 Comparison of the Nominal Grouping and Sequenced Brainstorming Techniquesof Creative Idea Generation: a Field Study. Walter Edward Stead Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Stead, Walter Edward, "Comparison of the Nominal Grouping and Sequenced Brainstorming Techniquesof Creative Idea Generation: a Field Study." (1976). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2992. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2992 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original subm itted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 76-28,833 STEAD, Walter Edward, 1946- COMPARISON OF THE NOMINAL GROUPING AND SEQUENCED BRAINSTORMING TECHNIQUES OF CREATIVE IDEA GENERATION: A FIELD STUDY. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1976 Business Administration Xerox University MicrofilmsAnn f Arbor, Michigan 48106 © 1976 WALTER EDWARD STEAD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COMPARISON OF THE NOMINAL GROUPING AND SEQUENCED BRAINSTORMING TECHNIQUES OF CREATIVE IDEA GENERATION: A FIELD STUDY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Management by W alter Edward Stead B .S ., Auburn U n iv ersity , 1968 M.B.A., Auburn University, 1972 August, 1976 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To acknowledge all of the people who have in some way contri buted to the completion of this dissertation would be an insurmountable task. However, there are special individuals who deserve the undying gratitude of this author because without their professional, moral and often very personal support, this dissertation would have never become a r e a l i t y . Special gratitude must first be extended to Dr. Jerry A. Wallin, Chairman of my Ph.D. committee. The time and professional advice that Dr. Wallin provided me was critical in the completion of this project. But my gratitude to Dr. Wallin goes far beyond that of simply a profes sional relationship. If it were not for his uncanny ability to motivate and to provide encouragement during those times when the odds looked overwhelmingly negative, this dissertation may have never been com pleted. It is these characteristics that make Dr. Wallin, in my opinion, a true credit to his profession. I would also like to thank Dr. 0. Jeff Harris and Dr. Andy Deseran for their diligent assistance while serving as members of my reading committee. Their suggestions were invaluable in improving the q u a lity of th is d is s e rta tio n , and th e ir comments were always provided in a timely manner indicating their true concern for the student. Special thanks must be extended to Dr. Michael H. Peters. Although not a member of my committee, Dr. Peters willingly gave a i i i i i great deal of his time to insure that the statistical analysis performed in this study was correct® I would also like to extend my thanks to my fellow graduate stu d en ts, Mr. Danny W orrell, Mr. W illiam Sharbrough, Mr. Bill McCartney, and Mr. Alev Efendiouglu for their help in con ducting my experiment. I also wish to thank Dr. Raymond V. Lesikar and Dr. Leon C. Megginson who served as members of my committee. From a very personal standpoint, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my wife's parents, Mr. and Mrs. Tom Garner. The inspiration that they provided me to continue my schooling and to pursue my dreams regardless of the odds cannot be expressed in words. School has taught me a great deal about my profession, but they have taught me that the pursuit of happiness is the only quest which u lti mately has any meaning. Finally, I must extend to my wife, Jean, a gratitude which only she can understand. She has provided me with support and encouragement everyday for three years. She has given me many hours of technical assistance which were invaluable to the quality of this dissertation. But my gratitude for her goes far beyond this. Her love has given me the emotional stability to challenge new worlds without fear. She has instilled in me a confidence in my own ability, and a desire to prove that I have something to offer. Without her this dissertation, this degree, and this life would be insurmountable obstacles rather than enjoyable challenges. I love you Jean. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . » .......................................................... i i LIST OF TABLES . ......................... v i i LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................... ........ v i i ABSTRACT .................a.Qo.oe.o v i i i Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION......................................... 1 Purpose ................... .................. 1 S c o p e ................................ 1 Limitations. .................................. 1 A Historical Perspective ................................. 3 Definitional Orientation .... 7 Report Preview ....... ............................ ...... 15 2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE....................... 17 Orientation to the Chapter ................................................... 17 The Brainstorming Technique. ........................ ....... 18 Osborn—Applied Imagination ............ 18 Empirical Evidence Supporting Brainstorming .... 20 Individual vs. Group Problem Solving..................................... 24 Shaw—An E arly Study........................... 24 Conflicting Results .......................................... ...... 26 Possible Explanation of Conflicting Results .... 37 Nominal Grouping-«-The Delbecq/Van de Ven Method. 41 Empirical Results of the Oelbecq/ Van de Ven M eth o d .................................................. 42 Other Delbecq/Van de Ven. NGT Literature ...... 48 Formulation of the H ypothesis................................................... 51 3. METHODOLOGY. ................................ 55 Orientation to Chapter ...... ................... ..... 55 Selection of Sample. ..................................................................... 55 The P a rtic ip a n ts in the Experim ent ..................................... 55 The Division of Participants into Groups....................... 56 The J u s tif ic a tio n of Group Size S electio n ..... 58 iv V Page Selection of the Focus Problem .................................................. 59 S election of the Group L e a d e r s . 60 The Nominal Grouping Technique «... 61 The Orientation Phase . .................................... „ . 61 The Nominal Group Phase .............................................. 63 Sequenced Brainstorming Procedure .... 65 The Orientation Phase ............... 66 The Sequenced Brainstorming Phase ..................................... 67 Measurement of Variables . ....... 68 Q uantity........................... 68 U n iq u e n e s s........................................................................................ 69 Q uality.... ............ 70 Satisfaction ....................................................... 73 Statistical Evaluation ........................... 74 4. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ................. 77 Orientation to Chapter ......... 77 Summary of D ata........................................