Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for the 21St Century

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for the 21St Century Regenerating Local Economies: Environment, Equity and Entrepreneurship in America’s Post Industrial Cities A publication series produced by the MIT Community Innovators Lab with support from the Barr Foundation Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for the 21st Century Authors: Nicholas Iuviene Amy Stitely Lorlene Hoyt October 2010 About CoLab About this series The Community Innovators Lab (CoLab) is This guide is part in a series of publications a center for research, teaching, and practice on equitable economic development within the MIT Department of Urban Studies strategies for America’s post-industrial cities, and Planning (DUSP). CoLab supports funded in part by the Barr Foundation. Other the development and use of knowledge titles in this series include: from excluded communities to deepen civic engagement, improve community practice, Strengthening Local Economies and inform policy, mobilize community assets, and Civic Life: The Untapped Power of Small generate shared wealth. Businesses We believe that community knowledge can City Scale Retrofits: Learning from Portland drive powerful innovation and can help and Oakland make markets an arena for supporting social Network Power: Building Collaborative justice. CoLab facilitates the interchange Partnerships for Energy Efficiency and Equity of knowledge and resources between MIT and community organizations. We engage This series is written for community partners students to be practitioners of this approach and urban planners who are working to build to community change and sustainability. a more equitable and sustainable economy. For more information, visit our website at: http://web.mit.edu/colab/. website colab.mit.edu phone 617.253.3216 fax 617.258.6515 address 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 7-307 Cambridge, MA 02139 Assistant Text Editor and Layout: Annis Sengupta Cover Design and Graphics: Annis Sengupta and Amy Stitely Sustainable Economic Democracy: Worker Cooperatives for the 21st Century Table of Contents 4 Research Model 5 Introduction 8 Case One: Mondragon - Basque Region, Spain 10 Learning from Mondragon 13 Case Two: Evergreen - Cleveland, Ohio 16 Learning from Evergreen 17 Analysis: Key Differences between Mondragon and Evergreen 18 A Cooperative Development Framework 26 Conclusion 27 Key Considerations 28 Notes 3 Research Model Using teaching and research to inform practice: This series is one product flowing from a year- Beyond the required thesis document, the long collaboration among students, staff at students agreed to create media products and the Community Innovators Lab, and Professor practice-oriented guides that could be broadly Lorlene Hoyt, all of whom participated in distributed to community partners, policy- the pedagogical experiment called, “The advocates, and policy-makers. Collaborative Thesis Project.” CoLab faculty, staff, and affiliates supported The Collaborative Thesis Project was the project by brokering relationships with initiated by Professor Hoyt and emerged community partners, hosting reflective from her observation that many students meetings, co-advising students, co-authoring find the thesis process harrowing and, to and editing written products, providing some extent, unsatisfying, in part because media support, and co-organizing public theses usually meet their end on the library presentations. shelves. In hopes of making the process less isolating and more rewarding, and of The Collaborative Thesis Project has been making the products more useful, Hoyt invited a great vehicle for directing institutional six students to pursue their research as a research capacity toward a deeper collaborative unit under her supervision. understanding of equity, environment, and entrepreneurship and their connection to Each student researched a different post- democratic engagement. Through this project industrial American city or set of cities and we’ve tried to mobilize academia for action their use or potential use of stimulus funds and expand our range of impact. For more for regenerating local economies. The group information visit our blog feed at: met regularly throughout the academic year http://colabradio.mit.edu/?cat=317. to share discoveries, learn across cases, and co-develop recommendations for action. 4 Preface Introduction Now is the time for an alternative economic Initiative in Cleveland, Ohio (Evergreen). development framework. In the past two Drawing from these two cases, we then years we witnessed the near collapse of put forth a general framework for building a global financial markets and the highest scalable cooperative network in post-industrial national unemployment rate since the American cities. early 80s. In the wake of this crisis, we are challenged to find a sustainable and democratic way to generate wealth in cities. What is economic The kind of questions we need to answer are: democracy? Economic democracy is a socio-economic What is an appropriate path to arrangement where local economic economic development for de- institutions are democratically controlled. industrialized cities where the loss These economic institutions include business, of a manufacturing economy has left finance, research and development, and many people adrift? education sectors. Economic democracy does not reject the role of markets, but rather How can people who live and work in de-emphasizes the primacy of the profit- cities build robust local economies maximizing motive among economic decision that are based upon democratic makers. principles? One means to achieving economic democracy And, what role can rooted institutions is through cooperative ownership of the play in helping to reorganize local economy by all who participate. In this local economic activity so that case, a wide ownership structure can force a communities have greater control? realignment of interests that helps reconcile conflicts between the owners of productive assets and their laborers. Shared ownership of the local economy helps root wealth in Worker cooperatives, when configured communities, keeping resources from “leaking in a network with rooted institutions, can out” of the area. Cooperative businesses are promote progressive, place-based, and one of the more natural firm types that fits endogenous economic development. In this within the model of economic democracy, be guide, we explore the worker cooperative they worker, producer, consumer, or housing network as a neighborhood, municipal, and cooperatives. regional strategy for generating wealth. We present two examples: the well-established Mondragon Complex in Spain (Mondragon) and the nascent Evergreen Cooperative 5 Introduction What is a worker On its website, the International Cooperative Alliance traces the evolution of the original cooperative? Rochdale principles to the adoption of the Worker cooperatives are typically for-profit following seven in 1996: businesses that are jointly-owned and democratically controlled by the employees of International Cooperative Alliance the firm, often referred to as worker-owners. Statement of Cooperative Identity Cooperatives can range from small-scale (1996): to multi-million dollar businesses. Globally cooperatives employ more than 100 million 1. Voluntary and Open membership. people and have over 800 million members (1). Although the form of organization 2. Democratic member control. varies dramatically between firms, most worker cooperatives generally adhere to the 3. Member Contribution to Capital. Rochdale principles that were established by the British Rochdale Society of Equitable 4. Autonomy and independence. Pioneers in 1844. These principles outline a set of ideals to which all cooperative 5. Education of members and public in businesses should adhere. cooperative principles. Rochdale Principles of Cooperation (1844): 6. Cooperation between cooperatives. 1. Open membership. 7. Concern for community. 2. Democratic control (one person, one The International Cooperative Alliance states vote). that cooperatives are different than traditional enterprises in that they put people at the 3. Distribution of surplus in proportion center of all their businesses, as opposed to to trade. capital. Because cooperatives are owned and democratically-controlled by their members, 4. Payment of limited interest on business decisions balance the need for capital. profitability with the needs of their members and the wider interests of the community. 5. Political and religious neutrality. 6. Cash trading (no credit extended). 7. Promotion of education. 6 Introduction Worker Cooperatives in the and employs over one million people (2). Mondragon, founded in 1956, now holds U.S. 33.3 million euros in assets and employs Studies on the efficiency of worker over 85,000 people internationally (3). The cooperatives and their success rate vary questions arise: considerably. Cooperatives emerged in the What can be learned from these European mid-19th century in response to the labor experiences? abuses and inequities that resulted from the industrial revolution. In the U.S., the Is it possible to achieve similar success rates economic recession of the 70s and 80s led in the U.S. context? to a renewed interest in cooperatives. In this era, the employee shared ownership program The most important lesson from Legacoop (ESOP) became the dominant business and the Mondragon is the importance of model for American firms that aspired to developing an economically integrated cooperative principles. However, despite its network of cooperatives rather than a single
Recommended publications
  • SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT in PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-2\NVJ208.txt unknown Seq: 1 30-APR-14 10:47 SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M. Fink* Staat ist ein Verh¨altnis, ist eine Beziehung zwischen den Menschen, ist eine Art, wie die Menschen sich zu einander verhalten; und man zerst¨ort ihn, indem man andere Beziehungen eingeht, indem man sich anders zu einander verh¨alt.1 I. INTRODUCTION In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, municipal govern- ments in various US cities assumed responsibility for utilities and other ser- vices that previously had been privately operated. In the late twentieth century, prompted by fiscal crisis and encouraged by neo-liberal ideology, governments embraced the concept of “privatization,” shifting management and control over public services2 to private entities. Despite disagreements over the merits of privatization, both proponents and opponents accept the premise of a fundamental distinction between the “public” and “private” sectors, and between “state” and “market” institutions. A more skeptical view questions the analytical soundness and practical signifi- cance of these dichotomies. In this view, “privatization” is best understood as a rhetorical strategy, part of a broader neo-liberal ideology that relies on putative antinomies of “public” v. “private” and “state” v. “market” to obscure and rein- force social and economic power relations. While “privatization” may be an ideological definition of the situation, for public service workers the difference between employment in the “public” and “private” sectors can be real in its consequences3 for job security, compensa- * Associate Professor of Law, Elon University School of Law, Greensboro, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Repository Do Coops Speak the Managerial Lingua Francal
    Do Co-ops Speak the Managerial Lingua Franca ? An analysis of the Managerial Discourse of Mondragon Cooperatives Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria* Department of Business Organization University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [email protected] Imanol Basterretxea Department of Financial Economics and Accounting University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [email protected] . This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Basterretxea, I. (2016). Do co-ops speak the managerial lingua franca? An analysis of the managerial discourse of Mondragon cooperatives. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 4(1), 13-21.(DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2016.02.001) The copy-edited version is available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213297X16300015 1 Do Co-ops Speak the Managerial Lingua Franca ? An analysis of the Managerial Discourse of Mondragon Cooperatives Abstract A trend towards conventional managerialism has been identified in cooperative organizations, and it has been suggested that this is a symptom of the phenomenon of degeneration in cooperatives. Although managerial discourse is at the heart of the dominant managerialism, not much attention has been given to this trend. To fill this gap in the literature, the present study analyzes the managerial discourse of the organizations grouped within the Mondragon cooperative experience, based on a content and discourse analysis of the organizational information published by the Corporation and its 70 member-cooperatives. A mainstream popular managerial discourse is identified in the majority of the member-cooperatives, a discourse disconnected from the discourse of the Corporation. In the latter the basic cooperative values and principles are more strongly emphasized.
    [Show full text]
  • Computers and Economic Democracy
    Rev.econ.inst. vol.1 no.se Bogotá 2008 COMPUTERS AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY Computadores y democracia económica Allin Cottrell; Paul Cockshott Ph.D. in Economics, professor of Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, USA, [[email protected]]. Ph.D. in Computer Science, researcher of the Glasgow University, Glasgow, United Kingdom, [[email protected]].. The collapse of previously existing socialism was due to causes embedded in its economic mechanism, which are not inherent in all possible socialisms. The article argues that Marxist economic theory, in conjunction with information technology, provides the basis on which a viable socialist economic program can be advanced, and that the development of computer technology and the Internet makes economic planning possible. In addition, it argues that the socialist movement has never developed a correct constitutional program, and that modern technology opens up opportunities for democracy. Finally, it reviews the Austrian arguments against the possibility of socialist calculation in the light of modern computational capacity and the constraints of the Kyoto Protocol. [Keywords: socialist planning, economic calculation, environmental constraints; JEL: P21, P27, P28] El colapso del socialismo anteriormente existente obedeció a causas integradas en su mecanismo económico, que no son inherentes a todos los socialismos posibles. El artículo muestra que la teoría económica marxista, junto con la informática, proporciona el fundamento para adelantar un programa económico socialista viable y que el desarrollo de la informática y de Internet hace posible la planificación económica. Además, argumenta que el movimiento socialista nunca desarrolló un programa constitucional correcto y que la tecnología moderna abre nuevas oportunidades para la democracia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Cooperatives and Cooperative Development
    Bibliography of Cooperatives and Cooperative Development Compiled by the following Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs personnel: Original, 1999 Christopher D. Merrett, PhD, IIRA director and professor Norman Walzer, PhD, professor of Economics and IIRA director emeritus Update, 2007 Cynthia Struthers, PhD, associate professor, Housing/Rural Sociology Program Erin Orwig, MBA, faculty assistant, Value-Added Rural Development/Cooperative Development Roger Brown, MBA, manager, Value-Added Rural Development/Cooperative Development Mathew Zullo, graduate assistant Ryan Light, graduate assistant Jeffrey Nemeth, graduate assistant S. Robert Wood, graduate assistant Update, 2012 Kara Garten, graduate assistant John Ceglarek, graduate assistant Tristan Honn, research assistant Published by Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs Stipes Hall 518 Western Illinois University 1 University Circle Macomb, IL 61455-1390 [email protected] www.IIRA.org This publication is available from IIRA in print and on the IIRA website. Quoting from these materials for noncommercial purposes is permitted provided proper credit is given. First Printing: September 1999 Second Printing: September 2007 Third Printing: June 2012 Printed on recycled paper Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................1 II. Theory and History of Cooperatives ....................................................................................................3 III. Governance,
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Economics & the Next System
    Created by Matt Caisley from the Noun Project Participatory Economics & the Next System By Robin Hahnel Introduction It is increasingly apparent that neoliberal capitalism is not working well for most of us. Grow- ing inequality of wealth and income is putting the famous American middle class in danger of becoming a distant memory as American children, for the first time in our history, now face economic prospects worse than what their parents enjoyed. We suffer from more frequent financial “shocks” and linger in recession far longer than in the past. Education and health care systems are being decimated. And if all this were not enough, environmental destruction continues to escalate as we stand on the verge of triggering irreversible, and perhaps cataclys- mic, climate change. yst w s em p e s n s o l s a s i s b o i l p iCreated by Matt Caisley o fromt the Noun Project r ie s & p However, in the midst of escalating economic dysfunction, new economic initia- tives are sprouting up everywhere. What these diverse “new” or “future” economy initiatives have in common is that they reject the economics of competition and greed and aspire instead to develop an economics of equitable cooperation that is environmentally sustainable. What they also have in common is that they must survive in a hostile economic environment.1 Helping these exciting and hopeful future economic initiatives grow and stay true to their principles will require us to think more clearly about what kind of “next system” these initiatives point toward. It is in this spirit
    [Show full text]
  • Mondragon Automoción
    MONDRAGON TERCER TRIMESTRE 2020 HIRUGARREN HIRUHILEKOA AUTOMOCIÓN AUTOMOZIO SEKTORERA LOTUTAKO NEGOZIOA, MUGIKORTASUN BERRIRAKO ERALDAKETA ERRONKATZAT HARTUTA. 614 EROSKI cierra el primer semestre del ejercicio con un beneficio de 48 millones. DEBAGOIENA 2030 Garapen iraunko- rrerako sareak 14 proiektu ditu eskuartean. IKERLAN Y CAF desarrollan soluciones de electromovilidad sosteni- ble. OSARTEN Koronabirusa detektatzeko probak egiten hasi da, bitarteko teknologiko egokiak eskuratuta. WEB BERRIA Diseinu berrituaz eta zenbait egokitzapenekin dator MONDRAGONeko web-a. RANKING FORTUNE CHANGE THE WORLD 5 LA REVISTA INCLUYE A MONDRAGON EN SU RANKING GLOBAL DE EMPRESAS QUE CAMBIAN EL MUNDO. www.tulankide.com 614 TERCER TRIMESTRE 2020 HIRUGARREN HIRUHILEKOA AUTOMOZIOA ETA ETORKIZUNEKO MUGIKORTASUNA 38 DID YOU KNOW THAT… Eraldaketa prozesuan murgilduta dagoen sektorea 39 MONDRAGON PEOPLE da automoziokoa, planetaren jasangarritasunaren Nace Mugi Digitalera. mesederako. Eta MONDRAGONeko negozioak ere 26 40 ELKARRIZKETA egokitzen ari dira etorkizuneko mugikortasun Ander Sansinenea, berrira. Sektorearen egungo egoera eta epe luzeko Pertsonen aholkularitzako estrategiak aztertu ditugu zenbaki honetan zuzendaria, LKS Next. 42 COOPERATIVAS Y ODS La sostenibilidad Daniel Castander 8 como eje estratégico. DOMUSA TEKNIK 43 ELKARRIZKETA “ Hemos lanzado la primera gama Iñaki Igarzabal, Médico del de calderas con conectividad trabajo en Ulma Taldea. a través de internet” 44 ERREPORTAJEA Endity Solutions. 46 ARIZMENDI IKASTOLA MONDRAGON INVIERTE EN TRES NUEVAS STARTUPS 18 Apaltasun kooperatiboa pandemian. HWS Concrete Towers, grúas 47 EUSKARALAN auto trepantes para el sector Iker Ajuriagerra, Errigorako kide eta eólico; OROI, realidad virtual udazkeneko kanpaina arduraduna. para personas mayores; y BCN3D, 48 SEGURIDAD Y SALUD LABORAL fabricación aditiva de metal. La mediación. 49 VASCOS UNIVERSALES EROSKI, MEJOR SUPER ONLINE SEGÚN LOS CONSUMIDORES 25 Jesús Guridi Bidaola, un genio modesto.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Farming Greenhorns Guidebook
    Cooperative Farming Frameworks for Farming Together a greenhorns guidebook by Faith Gilbert Contributing Authors: Kathy Ruhf, Land for Good • Lynda Brushett, Cooperative Development Institute This guidebook was funded by a Northeast SArE Sustainable Community innovations grant. Additional thanks to: Severine vT Fleming, the Greenhorns Jon Jaffe, Farm Credit East Jerry Cosgrove, New World Foundation Local Economies Project Joe Rhinehart, Democracy at Work Network Betsy Black, Cooperative Fund of New England Steve Hadcock, Cornell Cooperative Extension And to our featured farms and organizations: Corbin Hill Food Project Diggers’ Mirth Collective Farm, VT Little City Growers, RI Intervale Center, VT Island Grown Apprentice Program NOFA Massachusetts Southern Exposure Seed Exchange, VA Sleeping Frog Farm, AZ Tourne-Sol Co-operative Farm, QC Tweefontein Herb Farm, NY Winter Green Farm, OR And to the many individuals who shared their cooperative farming experiences with us. Illustrations by Brooke Budner • Design by Kimberly Boustead contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 4 Author’s Note ......................................................................................................4 What is a cooperative? What is cooperative farming? .....................................5 The Cooperative Farming Landscape...............................................................6 CHAPTER 1: Sharing Resources and Services .............7 Marketing & Distribution ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Workers in Management
    Review of Radical Political Economics 43(3) 328 –333 The Role of Workers © 2011 Union for Radical Political Economics Reprints and permission: http://www. in Management: The sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0486613411407715 Case of Mondragón http://rrpe.sagepub.com Al Campbell1 Abstract Independent of whatever other advantages it might have for the workers, worker ownership has repeatedly demonstrated in the real world that it is no guarantee for worker participation in management. The participation of workers in management as a first step toward worker self-management requires institutions and practices that will both allow such participation and promote it. This paper considers, in the frame of four standard issues in worker self- management, six specific institutions and practices common to the collection of co-ops that constitute the Mondragón complex that have generated meaningful worker participation in management in this large corporation. JEL classification: J54, L29, M19 Keywords economic democracy, workers’ participation in management, Mondragón, cooperatives This is not a paper about the rich multi-dimensional subject of the economics of the Mondragón complex of worker cooperatives. This is a case study of worker participation in management and self-management at Mondragón, at the present time. Specifically, this article will briefly exam- ine six institutional structures and practices at Mondragón that both allow and promote worker participation in management. 1. Structures1 and Practices for Supporting and Promoting Participation in Management Before examining these six institutions and practices, four issues will be briefly indicated that should be kept in mind. The first issue is the necessary interaction between direct and representative institutions and practices for participation in management.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity at Work. MONDRAGON, a Social Innovation
    Humanity at work MONDRAGON, a social innovation ecosystem case study First published in the United Kingdom in 2017 by The Young Foundation 18 Victoria Park Square London E 2 9 PF Acknowledgements Authors We wish to thank people both at MONDRAGON Dr Charlotte Heales, Dr Mary Hodgson co-operatives and living around its & Hannah Rich headquarters in the Basque Country who collaborated in the research by giving interviews and helping us understand the data. Illustrations We are very grateful that people gave their time to reflect on the research and its meaning. Poster design and illustration Jamie Beard. We have anonymised personal identifiers and Words, Dr Hannah Green. disguised some details in order that people felt able to speak freely. Any similarities are incidental and any mistakes ours. The authors Report design by also wish to thank colleagues at The Young Foundation who helped develop viewpoints and Effusion support the publishing of this case study. The Young Foundation Inequalities are widespread and complex and affect many areas of people’s lives. The Young Foundation is a research and action institute with a track record of confronting these inequalities. We work across the UK and internationally to create insight and innovations which put people at the heart of social change. We don’t exist only to accumulate capital… we want to leave future generations something better than what we found. 1 | | 2 Contents Foreword 5 Executive summary 6 Key implications of our research with MONDRAGON 9 1. Introduction 10 About this case study 12 About MONDRAGON, our case study context 13 Inter-co-operation and intra-co-operation 14 Case study: how inter and intra-co-operation is operationalised at MONDRAGON 15 The national context: the Basque Country 16 2.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Set up a Workers' Co-Op
    How to set up a Workers’ Co-op Fourth edition - Summer 2015 www.RadicalRoutes.org.uk How to set up a Workers’ Co-op First edition written by Catalyst Collective Ltd in 1994 and updated by Radical Routes Ltd in 2003. Third edition written by Footprint Workers' Co-operative Ltd and Seeds for Change Lancaster Co-operative Ltd in 2012. This fourth edition written by Footprint Workers’ Co-ooperative Ltd and Seeds for Change Lancaster Co-ooperative Ltd. in 2015 Published by Radical Routes Ltd. 16 Sholebroke Avenue, Chapeltown, Leeds, LS7 3HB www.radicalroutes.org.uk This work is anti-copyright. Feel free to copy, adapt and distribute it as long as the final work remains anti-copyright. (Credit to the authors / publishers would be appreciated) Design by Shtiggy shtiggy.wordpress.com Download a PDF of this booklet for free from: Illustrations by Carrie MacKinnon unless otherwise stated www.seedsforchange.org.uk Typeset in Open Sans or www.radicalroutes.org.uk (an open-source font) Printed by Footprint Workers Co-ooperative Ltd, 16 Sholebroke Avenue, Chapeltown, Leeds LS7 3HB Tel: 0113 262 4408 www.footprinters.co.uk Printed on 100% post-consumer waste paper ISBN 978-1-899212-04-0 Acknowledgements 2 How to set up a Workers’ Co-op There are also other types of co- 1. Introduction operatives covering other aspects of life. Housing co-operatives provide Taking control of our own lives is an secure, affordable housing; consumer important step in the fight against the co-operatives help people buy stuff or massive injustices and ecological services in bulk; and social centres devastation facing the world.
    [Show full text]
  • For All the People
    Praise for For All the People John Curl has been around the block when it comes to knowing work- ers’ cooperatives. He has been a worker owner. He has argued theory and practice, inside the firms where his labor counts for something more than token control and within the determined, but still small uni- verse where labor rents capital, using it as it sees fit and profitable. So his book, For All the People: The Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, reached expectant hands, and an open mind when it arrived in Asheville, NC. Am I disappointed? No, not in the least. Curl blends the three strands of his historical narrative with aplomb, he has, after all, been researching, writing, revising, and editing the text for a spell. Further, I am certain he has been responding to editors and publishers asking this or that. He may have tired, but he did not give up, much inspired, I am certain, by the determination of the women and men he brings to life. Each of his subtitles could have been a book, and has been written about by authors with as many points of ideological view as their titles. Curl sticks pretty close to the narrative line written by worker own- ers, no matter if they came to work every day with a socialist, laborist, anti-Marxist grudge or not. Often in the past, as with today’s worker owners, their firm fails, a dream to manage capital kaput. Yet today, as yesterday, the democratic ideals of hundreds of worker owners support vibrantly profitable businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives and the Ready-Made Garment Supply Chain
    COOPERATIVES AND THE WORLD OF WORK NO 11 Towards a better understanding of the role of cooperatives in the ready made garment supply chain 1 INTRODUCTION A cooperative is defined as an “autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise.”2 This business model has a long-standing history dating back to the first cooperative of weavers: the original Fenwick weavers from 1761, which soon expanded into providing affordable food and credit to members. 3 Nowadays, cooperatives exist along the supply chain of garments. From contribute to their prevention and elimination by raising awareness among growing fibres, manufacturing and commercialisation, to the consumption their members, supporting education, providing social services and and recycling of textiles, cooperatives have been serving various social creating better employment opportunities for adults and young workers.6 and economic needs of people directly or indirectly linked to the garment This brief unpacks the engagement of cooperatives in the garment supply industry. As democratic, membership-based organizations, cooperatives chain, describing their implications for decent work and highlighting the have presented socially and environmentally sustainable alternatives for action areas that address the challenges to integration of cooperatives producers and consumers of garments. in mainstream garment supply chains. Cooperatives are instrumental in generating income, creating employment, advancing formalization of the informal economy4 and COOPERATIVES IN THE GARMENT SUPPLY CHAIN AND THEIR promoting decent work5 particularly in the lower tiers of the supply ROLE IN PROMOTING DECENT WORK chains, where informality and decent work deficits are most prominent.
    [Show full text]