DOCSLIB.ORG

County of Peterborough Official Plan Has Two Functions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County of Peterborough Official Plan Has Two Functions COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH OFFICIAL PLAN 1994 with amendments consolidated to March 2020 Original OP Approved by MMAH – November 1994 CONSOLIDATION INCLUDES: OPA #1 ......... (Oak Ridges Moraine – Approved October 2004) OPA #2 ......... (Official Plan Update – Approved March 2006 – Effective 03-28-2006) OPA #3 ......... (Local Component – Approved October 2008) OPA #4 ......... (Local - Fitzgerald Fuels– Approved August 2009) OPA #5 ......... (Local – Steranko – Approved March 2011) OPA #6 ......... (Local – Peterborough Housing – Approved December 2009) OPA #7 ......... (Growth Plan Conformity – Approved January 2010) OPA #8 ......... (Local – Shrama Pit – Approved March 2010) OPA #9 ......... (Local – Pirie – Approved September 2010) OPA #10 ....... (Local – Ennismore Homestead Theatre – Approved July 2011) OPA #11 ....... (Local –Meharg – Approved May 2011) OPA #12 ....... (Local – Community Improvement Policies – Approved January 2012) OPA #13 ....... (Local –Welch – Approved June 2012) OPA #14 ....... (Local - Preston – Approved November 2012) OPA #15 ....... (Local –Vissers – Approved November 2012) OPA #16 ....... (Local – Haastown – September 2016) OPA #17 ....... (Local – Stewart – Approved December 2012) OPA #18 ....... (Local – Sharp – Approved February 2013) OPA #19 ....... (Local – Selwyn Public Works Yard – Approved September 2013) OPA #20 ....... (Local – Ventresca – In Process) OPA #21 ....... (Local – Durham Building Corp. – Approved June 2016) OPA #22 ....... (Local – Addition of Douro-Dummer – Approved April 2014) OPA #23 ....... (Local – Cadorin – Approved April 2014) OPA #24 ....... (Local – Jenden-Selway – Approved May 2014) OPA #25 ....... (Local – Douro-Dummer Rural Consent – Approved September 2014) OPA #26 ....... (Local – Triple T Lakefield – Approved November 2015) OPA #27 ....... (Local – Havas – Appealed to OMB) OPA #28 ....... (Local – Eastern Star Temple – Approved February 2015) OPA #29 ....... (Local – Kingdon Lumber – Approved January 2017) OPA #30 ....... (Local – Young – Approved January 2016) OPA #31 ....... (Brookfield) OPA #32 ....... (Source Water Protection – Approved June 2016) OPA #33…… (Local – Wood – Approved July 2016) OPA #34…… (Local – Irwin – Approved August 2016) OPA #35…… OPA #36…… (Local – Archer – Approved October 2016) OPA #37…… OPA #38…… (Local – Lovesick Lake Park – In Process) OPA #39…… (Local – Norwood Park – In Process) OPA #40…… (Local – Payne – Approved December 2016) OPA #41…… (Local – Primrose Lane – Approved January 2017) OPA #42…… (Local – Moher – Approved August 2017) OPA #43…… (Local – Doyle – Approved May 2017) OPA #44…… (Local – St. Jean/Raymond – Approved August 2017) OPA #45…… (Local – Sullivan – Approved August 2017) OPA #46…… (Local – Irwin Inn Resort – Approved October 2017) OPA #47…… (Local – Edward St. – Approved April 2019) OPA #48…… (Local – Second Units – Approved April 2019) OPA #49…… (Local – Burleigh Falls Marina – In Process) OPA #50…… (Local – Rosemere Manor – Approved November 2019) OPA #51….. (Local – A Rustic Event Barn – Approved June 2019) OPA #52….. (Local – Chemong Home Hardware – Approved January 2020) OPA #53….. (Local – Norwood Park Phase 3 – Approved September 2019) OPA #54….. (Local – Bell-Plouffe – Approved November 2019) OPA #55….. (Local – Hubble – In Process) OPA #56….. (Local – NDMP Floodplain Mapping for DD, NK SEL – Approved February 2020) OPA #57….. (Local – Taylor Garage NK – In Process) OPA #58….. (Local – Cannabis Cultivation & Processing in SEL – Approved March 2020) OPA #59….. (Local – Iron Woods Drive DD – In Process) COUNTY OFFICIAL PLAN – TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Structure of the Official Plan ............................................................. 1-1 1.2 County Strategy ...................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 - Implications of the County Vision .............................................................. 1-4 1.2.2 - Components of the Strategy ........................................................................ 1-4 1.2.3 - Future Growth ............................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 General .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Amendments to the Plan ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Local Official Plans ................................................................................................ 2-2 2.4 Local Zoning By-Laws ........................................................................................... 2-2 2.5 Development Charges ............................................................................................. 2-3 2.6 Development Applications ..................................................................................... 2-4 2.6.1 - Subdivision Approvals and Agreements ..................................................... 2-5 2.6.2 - Site Plan Control ......................................................................................... 2-6 2.6.3 - Division of Land .......................................................................................... 2-6 2.6.3.1 - General Policies .............................................................................. 2-6 2.6.3.2 - Settlement Areas ........................................................................... 2-10 2.6.3.3 - Shoreland Areas ............................................................................ 2-11 2.6.3.4 - Agricultural Areas ......................................................................... 2-13 2.6.3.5 - Rural Areas ................................................................................... 2-15 2.7 Public Participation ............................................................................................... 2-17 3.0 WATERSHED STRATEGIC APPROACH ............................................................... 3-1 3.1 Rationale for Approach .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 - Water Management Issues/Concerns .......................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 - Land Use Planning and Water Management Linkages ............................... 3-2 3.1.3 - Reasoning for Watershed Boundaries ......................................................... 3-2 3.2 Description of Watershed Areas ............................................................................. 3-3 Official Plan County of Peterborough TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 3.3 Implementation of Approach .................................................................................. 3-3 3.3.1 - Watershed Management Plan ...................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 - Subwatershed Management Plan ................................................................ 3-4 3.4 Coordination of Approach ...................................................................................... 3-4 4.0 WATERSHED STRATEGIC COMPONENTS ........................................................... 4-1 4.1 Natural Environment ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 - Goal .............................................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.2 - Objectives ..................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3 - Policies ......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.3.1 - General ............................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.3.2 - Flood Plains ..................................................................................... 4-5 4.1.3.3 - Mineral Aggregate and Non-Aggregate Mineral Resources .............. 4-8 4.1.3.4 - Natural Heritage Features ............................................................... 4-11 4.1.3.5 - Water Resources............................................................................. 4-12 4.1.3.6 - Oak Ridges Moraine ....................................................................... 4-14 4.2 Settlement Areas .................................................................................................... 4-17 4.2.1 - Goal ............................................................................................................ 4-17 4.2.2 - Objectives ................................................................................................... 4-18 4.2.3 - Policies ....................................................................................................... 4-18 4.3 Rural and Cultural Landscape ................................................................................ 4-23 4.3.1 - Goal ............................................................................................................ 4-23 4.3.2 - Objectives ................................................................................................... 4-23 4.3.3 - Policies ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capsule Railway History of Peterborough County
    23ae Peterborough County – A Capsule Railway History BACKGROUND Before the Railway Age, travel and the movement of goods in Upper Canada were primarily dependent on wa- terways, and primitive trails that passed for roads. Needless to say, both of these modes of transportation relied very much on the weather of the seasons. Agitation for a more efficient mode of transportation had started to build with the news of the new-fangled railroad, but the economic depression of 1837 and the years following were bad years for Upper Canada and for railway development, especially in view of the unsettled economic and political conditions in England, on whose financial houses the crucial investment in railway ventures de- pended. However, in 1849 the Province of Canada passed the Railway Guarantee Act which guaranteed the interest on loans for the construction of railways not less than 75 miles in length. It was this legislation that trig- gered Canada's railway building boom. While the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada (GTR), incorporated in 1852, busied itself with its trunk line along Lake Ontario, the waterfront towns were busy with their own railway ambitions. They saw themselves as gate- ways to the untapped resources of the "hinterland". Thus emerged a pattern of "development roads" from Whit- by, Port Hope, Cobourg, Trenton, Belleville, Napanee, Kingston, Brockville and Prescott. (Toronto had already led the way with its portage road to Collingwood, and later participated in additional development roads to Owen Sound and Coboconk.) North of Lake Ontario were rich natural resources and a rapidly expanding population as successive waves of immi- grants had to seek land further north from Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Adjustment
    MUNICIPALITY OF TRENT LAKES COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT May 2, 2017 Council Chambers, 4:30 PM Agenda Call to Order Page 1. Disclosure of Interest 2. Adoption of Minutes a) Meeting Held April 4, 2017 (3 - 7) Committee of Adjustment - Minutes - 04 Apr 2017 3. Minor Variance Applications a) A-17-09 (Paradise Vacation Properties) (8 - 16) Concession 11 Pt. Lot 4, 45R-14315 Part 1 (Harvey) Roll No. 1542-010-001-04711 35 Fire Route 36A Subject of Minor Variance: Garage A-17-09 Memo A-17-09 Site Plan A-17-09 Notice b) A-17-10 (French) (17 - 25) Concession 16, Pt. Lot 24, Plan 45R-2398, Part 2 (Harvey) Roll No. 1542-010-002-85601 39 Fire Route 111 Subject of Minor Variance: Garage A-17-10 Memo A-17-10 Site Plan A-17-10 Notice c) A-17-11 (Amerie/Hideaway Homes) (26 - 36) Concession 12, Pt. Lot 7 (Harvey) Roll No. 1542-010-001-17700 57 Fire Route 44 Subject of Minor Variance: Deck Expansion A-17-11 Memo A-17-11 Site Plan A-17-11 Notice d) A-17-12 (West/Boisvert) (37 - 50) All times provided on the agenda are approximate only and may be subject to change. Page 1 of 66 MUNICIPALITY OF TRENT LAKES COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT TUESDAY, MAY 2, 2017 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 4:30 P.M. AGENDA Concession 11, Lot 16, Plan 32, Lot 20 (Harvey) Roll No. 1542-010-002-36300 114 Peninsula Drive Subject of Minor Variance: Garage A-17-12 Memo A-17-12-Site Plan A-17-12 Notice e) A-17-13 (Blacklaw) (51 - 61) Concession 4, Pt.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project
    Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 1 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) for the Kawartha Region kawarthasnaturally.ca Report CSD12-014 Page 2 of 13 Protecting Your Natural Environmental and Cultural Heritage in the Kawarthas Report CSD12-014 Page 3 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected is a Priority Action for Sustainable Peterborough…………… Natural Assets Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 4 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) Natural Heritage Systems • “…a system made up of natural heritage features and areas linked by natural corridors which are necessary to maintain biodiversity…can include lands that have been restored and areas with potential to be restored…” (Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2005) • A system that maintains the health of the landscape, and the health of our communities. • An essential backbone of sustainability, including economic. • A system of green infrastructure providing critical ecosystem services. Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 5 of 13 Many organizations and agencies are involved in land management but are their activities integrated? Southern Ontario: A Fragmented Landscape Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 6 of 13 What is a Natural Heritage System (NHS)? • Features and areas: – Wetlands – Woodlands – Lakes – Streams – Meadows – Cultural Heritage Features – Plants and animals they contain D. Puric-Mladenovic – Respects cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Agenda Was Developed Simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan
    PETERBOROUGH – LAKEFIELD POLICE SERVICES BOARD STRATEGIC AGENDA November 2012 INDEX page Introduction 3 Basic Assumptions 5 Observations and Analysis 6 Police Priorities 11 List of Reference Documents 13 MPM Consulting Hodgson Associates Page 2 Introduction As part of its regular business planning process, the Peterborough Lakefield Police Services Board decided to create a corollary report that would focus on a period much longer than the three year timeframe for the Business Plan. This Strategic Agenda was developed simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan. Information gained through review of existing documentation as well as observations and opinions provided during the consultation phase of the business planning process, provided the basis for the recommendations contained in the Strategic Agenda. The Peterborough Lakefield Police Service is considered a leader in the provision of community based policing. By following the principles and priorities contained in the Strategic Agenda, the Board can continue this strong commitment to the communities it represents. The Strategic Agenda depends on projections that have already been developed with respect to the long term changes identified for both communities. By studying these trends, the Board can develop general directions for the Peterborough Lakefield Community Police Service that will direct the planning process and provide guidance for changes that are planned for the operation and administration of the Police Service. Ultimately the Strategic Agenda should provide a basis for fundamental organizational improvements that will occur in the next few decades. It should also assist the Board in determining which financial, and human resource, investments best reflect the realities in these changing communities.
    [Show full text]
  • See & Do Guide
    SEE & DO GUIDE 1.800.461.6424 | thekawarthas.ca QUEBEC ONTARIO Ottawa Montreal G E O R G IA N B A L Kingston A Y K E H U R O N Toronto RIO Kitchener- ONTA LAKE N Waterloo A NEW YORK G I H Hamilton C I Niagara Falls M Bualo E London BUILD YOUR BUCKET LIST 2 K A L MICHIGAN PLACES TO STAY 4 E R I E FOOD & DRINK 12 K E Windsor L A PENNSYLVANIA ATTRACTIONS 19 OUTDOOR RECREATION 26 OHIO SHOPPING 34 facebook.com/TheKawarthas SALONS, SPAS & RETREATS 40 @pktourism CONFERENCE & BANQUET 41 FACILITIES pinterest.com/pktourism COMMUNITY CENTRES & 42 instagram.com/thekawarthas SPORTS FACILITIES CHAMBERS, SERVICES & 43 OLG TOURIST ASSOCIATIONS Become a Peterborough & the Kawarthas Insider – sign up at thekawarthas.ca/newsletter A publication of Visitor Information 705-742-2201 Toll free: 1-800-461-6424 Peterborough & the Kawarthas Tourism Fax: 705-742-2494 is a division of Peterborough Economic www.thekawarthas.ca Development and is the Destination [email protected] Marketing Organization for the Peterborough For Visitor Centre information, please visit region, which consists of the City of thekawarthas.ca/visitor-centre Peterborough as well as the eight rural Cover photo: Allan Glanfield for townships and two First Nations in the Ontario Tourism County of Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. Strong efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, however the information is subject to change, and we assume no liability for any damages or loss arising from errors, omissions or information given in any of the advertisements, listings or editorial included in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Mr. Doherty
    Descendants of Mr. Doherty Generation 1 1. MR.1 DOHERTY . He married MRS. DOHERTY. Mr. Doherty and Mrs. Doherty had the following children: 2. i. JAMES2 DOHERTY was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. 3. ii. WILLIAM DOHERTY was born in 1799 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 10 Jun 1857 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Catherine Maxy on 16 Feb 1822 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. She was born in Tipperary, Ireland. She died before 1847. Generation 2 2. JAMES2 DOHERTY (Mr.1) was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. James Doherty and Honora O'Donnell had the following children: 4. i. PATRICK3 DOHERTY was born on 18 Mar 1835 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. He died on 06 Sep 1904 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Bridget Sullivan, daughter of Michael Sullivan and Mary Allen, on 16 Feb 1857 in Douro, Ontario, Canada (Witnesses were William Doherty and Bridget Allen).
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: the Case of Chatham-Kent
    Western Public Health Casebooks Volume 2018 2018 Article 19 2018 Case 14 : Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The aC se of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner Western University Stanley Ing Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Laura Zettler Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Gerald McKinley Western University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/westernpublichealthcases Recommended Citation Turner, T., Ing, S., Zettler, L., McKinley, G. (2018). Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The asC e of Chatham-Kent. in: McKinley, G. & Sibbald, S.L. [eds] Western Public Health Casebook 2018. London, ON: Public Health Casebook Publishing. This Case is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Public Health Casebooks by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health CASE 14 Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The Case of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner, BSc, MPH (MPH Class of 2017) Stanley Ing, MPH, CPHI(c) (Epidemiologist, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Laura Zettler, MSc (Epidemiologist/Program Manager, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Gerald McKinley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Western University) Today’s generation is likely the first to be less healthy and die sooner than their parents’ generation (Heart & Stroke, 2017). This statement should activate the critical and analytical parts of one’s thinking to ask: “Are certain populations more affected than others?”; “What are the social, ethical, medical, and economical implications?”; and ultimately; “Why?” To evaluate a population’s health requires an understanding of the population itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading?
    Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist) Environmental Management Branch (OMAFRA) November 23, 2017 Agenda • Components of Soil Health • 4W’s of provincial soil map renewal initiatives • Precision ag data on farm & opportunities for site-specific soil health sampling & remediation • Summary Case Study: Linking soil health, mapping to crop productivity Soil Health Physical Chemical Biological Soil Function, Properties & Health Soil Compaction %OM Texture Flora and fauna Aggregate Macro/micro Stability PMN pH Mineral compounds Nutrient level Why are we renewing soil maps in Ontario? Making 21st Century decisions with mid-20th Century information Maps generated over 80 year period. Many have never had any updates or revision 5 Who is doing soil map renewal in Ontario? • Collaborative effort – AAFC (Xiaoyuan Geng) – U of G (Asim Biswas) – OMAFRA • Projects – Lake Erie watershed – Grand River watershed – GLASI Priority Sub-watersheds – Ottawa – Peterborough County • Techniques (using R): – cLHS – Optimization – Predictive modelling – Polygon disaggregation 6 Physical Where are we renewing soil maps in the near term? • Ottawa Urban Fringe • Peterborough County • Cochrane – Hearst • Temiskaming Shores 7 • GRCA • Greater Golden Horseshoe What were the legacy conventions of soil mapping? Clay Example: Soils of the Ottawa Area Loam Sand • Legacy maps were over designed for hard copy readability (e.g. Clay 1”=1mile) Shallow • Conventions were digitized and transcribed into GIS • Now found in an Clay interactive map viewer - Ag Info Atlas: Glacial Till ontario.ca/agmaps Drumlins 8 What are the current day technologies used in soil map Physical renewal? 2 yr LiDAR project • 3 planned capture areas ~ 30,000 sq km • leaf off: fall 2016 and spring 2017 • Open data • Detailed DEM products 9 OMAFRA Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) Projects • Ottawa Soil Survey Project Ottawa – Phase 1 – Urban Fringe: 855 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an Asterisk * Do Not Have Depth Information and Appear with Improvised Contour Lines County Information Is for Reference Only
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Lakes with an asterisk * do not have depth information and appear with improvised contour lines County information is for reference only. Your lake will not be split up by county. The whole lake will be shown unless specified next to name eg (Northern Section) (Near Follette) etc. LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake St Clair Great Lakes GL (MI) Great Lakes Cedar Creek Reservoir AL Deerwood Lake Franklin AL Dog River Shelby AL Gantt Lake Mobile AL Goat Rock Lake * Covington AL (GA) Guntersville Lake Lee Harris (GA) AL Highland Lake * Marshall Jackson AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Jordan Lake Blount AL Lake Gantt * Elmore AL Lake Jackson * Covington AL (FL) Lake Martin Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Mitchell Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Chilton Coosa AL Lake Wedowee (RL Harris Reservoir) Tuscaloosa AL Lay Lake Clay Randolph AL Lewis Smith Lake * Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Logan Martin Lake Cullman Walker Winston AL Mobile Bay Saint Clair Talladega AL Ono Island Baldwin Mobile AL Open Pond * Baldwin AL Orange Beach East Covington AL Bon Secour River and Oyster Bay Baldwin AL Perdido Bay Baldwin AL (FL) Pickwick Lake Baldwin Escambia (FL) AL (TN) (MS) Pickwick Lake (Northern Section, Pickwick Dam to Waterloo) Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL (TN) (MS) Shelby Lakes Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL Tallapoosa River at Fort Toulouse * Baldwin AL Walter F.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Plants in the Kawartha Lakes – Their Growth, Importance and Management
    Aquatic plants in the Kawartha Lakes – their growth, importance and management Kawartha Lake Stewards Association Spring, 2009 Aquatic Plants Guide Aquatic plants in the Kawartha Lakes – their growth, importance and management A 2009 publication by The Kawartha Lake Stewards Association (KLSA) KLSA publications committee: Pat Moffat, Kathleen Mackenzie, Sheila Gordon-Dillane, Janet Duval, Kevin Walters, Simon Conolly with Andrea Hicks, M.Sc., Dr. Eric Sager, and illustrations by Gail Hawkins, watercolours Colleen Middleton and Jessica Middleton, pen and ink drawings Special thanks to the members of the summer aquatic plants study team: Kyle Borrowman Lynn Woodcroft Colleen Middleton Naheed Mirebrahimi Jessica Middleton Copyright ©2009 KLSA. Copying for non-commercial purposes is welcomed, provided KLSA copyright ownership is acknowledged and the Disclaimer is included. Kawartha Lake Stewards Association - 1 - Aquatic Plants Guide Table of Contents Living in the Kawarthas ...............................................................................................................3 Types of aquatic plants ...............................................................................................................6 Benefits of aquatic plants ...........................................................................................................7 Aquatic weeds ...................................................................................................................................9 Invasive species ................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]