DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Ryedale District Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Ryedale District Council Area 19 Belonging to North Yorkshire County Council Area 21 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Ryedale District Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier local authority areas only; the results may however identify issues which overlap with adjacent areas. Reports and data for other two-tier areas are provided separately. Ryedale District Council (North Yorkshire CC) Scarborough BC (North Yorkshire CC) Hambleton DC (N Yorks CC) Ryedale DC (North Yorkshire CC) City of Data is available from two-tier authorities in these County York Council areas: Council East Riding of Yorkshire Cheshire Council Durham Cumbria Lancashire Northumberland North Yorkshire Key: BC = Borough Council DC = District Council CC = County Council Source: MORI Methodology Both quantitative and qualitative research has been carried out in the Ryedale District Council area, as in each two-tier district council area in the Yorkshire and the Humber region. Quantitative research seeks to answer the question of ‘what’ residents think, by measuring their attitudes on a range of pre-set questions in the context of an interview, rather than holding an in-depth discussion on the issues involved. It provides statistically robust data. 1 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Within each two-tier district or borough council area, some 300 quantitative face- to-face interviews were carried out in-home between 19th June and 31st August 2003. A total of 2,171 interviews took place across all two-tier authorities in the Yorkshire and Humber area, with 317 interviews being conducted in the Ryedale District Council area. Quotas were set by age, gender and work status using 2001 Census data. Data have been weighted back to the known demographic profile of each district or borough council area by age and gender, and for aggregate county, regional and overall findings by the population size of each individual district or borough council area. Full computer tabulations have been provided in a separate volume. Qualitative research helps probe the thinking processes and feelings of residents, and attempts to answer the question as to ‘why?’ residents might feel the way they do. In the Ryedale District Council area, a qualitative discussion group was held to establish how residents feel about their local community. The findings from this group were analysed within the context of the findings from discussion groups in the other 43 district or borough council areas under consideration by this study. Discussion groups do not seek to offer statistical validity from a representative sample, but seek to explore attitudes and opinions in greater depth than the quantitative research allows. It should also be borne in mind that, in order to get an overview of the in-depth feelings in each area as well as explore linkages across the region, only one discussion group was held in each district or borough council area. The findings from each group should therefore be viewed in the context of the other discussion groups which have taken place, as well as the quantitative findings. This is because the findings from participants from just one discussion group may be unrepresentative of general opinion, and misleading if viewed out of context. Report Structure This report provides an overview of the findings from the research for the Ryedale District Council area. Individual summary reports for the research conducted within each of the other two-tier authorities in the Yorkshire and Humber region have been issued under separate cover. Publication of the Data As part of our standard terms and conditions, the publication of the data in this report is subject to the advance approval of MORI. This would only be refused on the grounds of inaccuracy or misinterpretation of the findings. 2 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Contact Details The research was carried out by MORI for COI Communications, acting on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England. Simon Atkinson, Research Director, MORI Emma Holloway, Senior Research Executive, MORI Jaime Rose, Senior Research Executive, MORI Neil Wholey, Senior Research Executive, MORI 79-81 Borough Road London SE1 1FY Tel: 020 7347 3000 Fax: 020 7347 3800 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mori.com 3 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Executive Summary • Residents in the Ryedale District Council area identify most strongly with their local neighbourhood/village, and their town/nearest town. They show less identity with the administrative areas of the local two- tier councils. This is not an unusual finding, as people will generally identify with the immediate area where they have made their home, rather than a large geographical area. • The Ryedale District Council area is largely rural, with activity concentrated on the town of Malton. Two in five residents most associate themselves with the town of Malton, with nearly a fifth associating with Pickering. One sixth of residents most associate themselves with Scarborough, in the neighbouring Scarborough Borough Council area. • "Effective Communities" are the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater for shopping or leisure needs, work place, or where parents take their children to school. For food shopping, leisure activities and work, around half of residents stay within the Ryedale District Council area. However, other key destinations especially for food shopping include York, which is particularly popular for those in higher social grades, and Scarborough for those in lower social grades. • As has been found in other district and borough council areas nearby, York is a local focal point for clothes and household goods shopping. However, few residents actually feel that York or Scarborough are areas or communities they most belong to. This was apparent in both the quantitative survey and the group discussion. This suggests that they may be good places to visit, but do not form lasting community ties. • "Affective Communities" describes the sense of place created by residents forming an emotional attachment to a community. Identity with the local neighbourhood is naturally stronger for those who take part in community activities. It is also interesting that those who stay in the local Ryedale District Council area for their main food shopping feel a closer bond with the Council area. • Overall, two thirds of Ryedale District Council residents feel they belong to a local area or community within this council area. This is in line with other district or borough council areas in the North Yorkshire County Council area. 4 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Interpreting the Findings • Neither the qualitative nor the quantitative research should be taken in isolation of the other, and nor should the findings of one district, borough, county or region be taken in isolation of the overall perspective provided by research in other areas. Just as residents themselves are at the centre of a number of different communities, so this research is at the centre of a wider body of research that provides context and a sense of place to the individual findings for each area. ©MORI/18710 Simon Atkinson Emma Holloway Jaime Rose Neil Wholey 5 Community Research in Ryedale District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Local Communities Defining Communities Communities, in the context of this research, are a sense of place. The strength of this sense of place is related to the involvement residents have in their communities, whether with people in their own immediate neighbourhood, or with places further afield through, for example, shopping trips or work. For residents there are a number of different and overlapping communities: • Administrative Communities: the sense of place created by local council administrative boundaries. • Effective Communities: the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater for shopping or leisure needs, or are a place of work, or where parents take their children to school. • Affective Communities: the sense of place created by residents forming an emotional attachment to a community. This is defined as where residents feel they most belong, the town or area they most identify with, and if they met someone from outside their region, where they might say they came from. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the effective and affective communities of residents in the Ryedale District Council area, and how these might relate to administrative boundaries. Identifying Communities Multifaceted communities require a multifaceted approach to identifying them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Promoting Wellbeing and Independence Guide for Adults 2020/21
    Promoting Wellbeing and Independence Guide for Adults 2020/21 • Staying independent • Support in your community • Home care • Care homes In association with www.carechoices.co.uk Overall Rating: GOOD Kind and Compassionate Residential, Nursing and Dementia Care in the heart of the community. Our carefully designed spaces Breakfast at the café, lunch in the Recently a relative wrote: allow us to off er a range of residential, pub, stunning views from the roof nursing and dementia care services. “Each one of your team contributed terrace, walks alongside the river, in making Mum feel special, which she Our experienced and professional the possibilities are endless... really appreciated, this was not isolated staff deliver compassionate, dignifi ed to just one area, this was a continuous and life enhancing care in a place The Chocolate Works Care Village theme which shone throughout each which is truly unique. is an unrivalled care community. department in the home.” If you think that we can help your family then The Chocolate Works | Bishopthorpe Road | York | YO23 1DE please call us for more information or to organise a visit... e: [email protected] w: www.chocolate-works.co.uk 01904 208008 Contents Welcome from North Yorkshire County Council 4 You’re in charge 52 The Independent Care Group 5 Personal Budgets 52 Regions covered by this Directory 6 Direct Payments 52 Where to go for trusted information, Housing with care 54 advice and guidance 6 Finding care in your area 7 Extra care housing 54 Sheltered housing 57 Health and wellbeing
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Position Statement Between the City of York and Selby District Council in Relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020
    Joint Position Statement between the City of York and Selby District Council in relation to the Housing Market Area, April 2020 Introduction 1. This statement seeks to clarify the position agreed between the City of York Council and Selby District Council through the Duty to Co-operate in relation to the Housing Market Area. Specifically, the statement seeks to: provide further clarification that any links between York and Selby only extend to part of the Selby area and that this is considered to support the approach taken by the Councils through the Duty to Co-operate to meet their own objectively assessed housing needs within their own administrative areas; and to clarify that both Council’s continue to maintain the position reached through the Duty to Co-operate that through the preparation of the York Local Plan and its submission and more recently with the review of the Selby Local Plan that it is not practical to seek to align the preparation of the two Plans and to consider housing needs jointly across the HMA. Preparation of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) 2. The 2004 Act refers to a Local Planning Authority’s (LPA) ‘area’ and it is clear that the statutory duty for an LPA is and must be in relation to their area. Thus the primary duty of the LPA is to assess the needs of their local authority area. 3. Paragraph 47 of the NPPF (2012) requires Local Plans to meet the full objectively assessed need in the Housing Market Area (HMA). Paragraph 159 of the NPPF helps clarify this, in that it requires LPAs to have a clear understanding of housing needs ‘in their area’.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Land Survey 2016
    North York Moors National Park Authority Residential Land Survey Report 2016 Housing Provision in the North York Moors National Park Introduction Residential land surveys are undertaken on an annual basis to provide information on residential completion rates and current housing land availability within the North York Moors National Park. The information contained in the survey is used to monitor the effectiveness of housing policies and inform the Authority Report. It is also intended to provide a useful source of information for developers, house builders and other interested individuals or organisations. The information contained in the survey is derived from building completion lists from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, the North Yorkshire Building Control Partnership Public Access database and the knowledge of Officers. Whilst the Authority believes that the information contained in the survey is correct it does not guarantee its accuracy, nor does the Authority accept any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or other consequences, however arising, from the use of such information supplied. The main points arising from the 2016 Residential Land Survey are: Completions are lower than last year, down by 19%. Planning permissions are lower than last year, from 74 new permissions in 2014/15 to 42 new permissions in 2015/16. The number of outstanding permissions and those permissions where building work has commenced remains relatively consistent. 23% of all completions were affordable dwellings (10 units). The Scarborough Borough part of the Park continues to provide the most completions however as developments in Helmsley start to progress, Ryedale is providing the highest number of planning permissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year! News: Staffing Update Carol-Ann Howe - Head of Inclusion Support Services;
    Communication and Interaction Team Newsletter Spring Term 2018 The Communication and Interaction Team are part of NYCC’s Inclusive Education Service, offering sup- port to educational settings for children and young people with Communication and Interaction diffi- culties. We are a team of Consultants, Specialist Teachers and Specialist Practitioners , comprising of a central team and professionals within Enhanced Mainstream Schools. We have a wide range of back- grounds, specialisms and experience including, Speech and Language therapy, Early Years, Autism and Psychology across the 0-25 age range. We provide a range of educational interventions and support for children and young people with speech, language, communi- cation and interaction needs. This includes children and young people with Autism, Developmental Language Disorder, Selec- tive Mutism, dysfluency and communication aid users. We also offer support and advice around a range of Social, Emotional and Mental Health needs and difficulties. Children and young people do not require any formal diagnosis to receive support from our team, we are a needs based service. Referrals should be made using a ‘Request for Involvement’ form see: http:// cyps.northyorks.gov.uk/special-educational-needs-disabilities . SEND mainstream guidance and details of the IES core and ex- tended offer can also be found on this webpage. Details on advice and specialist support for a child or young person with spe- cial educational needs or disabilities (SEND) can be found here: NYCC Local Offer: https://www.northyorks.gov.uk/send-
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Housing Allocation Policy
    Meeting: SCRUTINY COMMITTEE Date: 22 NOVEMBER 2011 Time: 5.00PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM To: Councillors I Chilvers, M Dyson, K Ellis, M Hobson, D Mackay, Mrs W Nichols (Chair), C Pearson, D Peart, R Price (Vice Chair) Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Scrutiny Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Scrutiny Committee held on 25 October 2011 (pages 3 to 11 attached). 4. Call In Items 5. Chair’s Address to the Scrutiny Committee 6. Crime and Disorder – Safer Neighbourhood Team Priorities North Yorkshire Police Report submitted for information only (page 12 to 13 attached). 7. North Yorkshire Home Choice – Allocations Choice Based Lettings Policy Report of the Policy Officer (page 14 to 57 attached). Julia Jennison and Vanessa Crane in attendance. 8. 2nd Quarter Corporate Plan Report Report of the Business Manager (page 58 to 72 attached). Eve Williams in attendance. Scrutiny Committee 22 November 2011 1 9. Access Selby Service Provision – Leisure Provision (WLCT) Report of the Senior Contracts Officer (pages 73 to 75 attached). Mike Lyons, WLCT - Head of Service (Sport and Leisure) and Aimi Brookes in attendance. 10. Access Selby Service Provision – Customer Contact Centre Report of the Lead Officer – Community Support Teams (pages 76 to 78 attached). Simon Parkinson in attendance. 11. Scrutiny Committee Work Programme The Committee are presented with the
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project on Fuel Poor Households
    To: Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire From: YES Energy Solutions Date: 28/6/2018 Research: Fuel poor households with no central heating in North Yorkshire Foreword ‘A study to identify householders with no central heating facilities that are most likely to be living in fuel poverty in Craven, Hambleton, Harrogate, Richmondshire, Ryedale, Scarborough and Selby.’ Contents 1. Overview p3 2. Research objectives p3 3. Funding opportunities p3 4. Methodology p4 4.1 Process p4 4.2 Fuel Poor LSOAs p4 4.3 Considerations p4-5 4.4 EPC data p5 5. Statistics – all areas p6 5.1 Homes with no central heating p6 5.2 Urban & Rural Split p6 5.3 General observations (All Areas) p7 6. Craven p8 6.1 Urban – Craven p9 6.2 Rural – Craven p10 7. Hambleton p11 7.1 Urban – Hambleton p12 7.2 Rural – Hambleton p13 8. Harrogate p14 8.1 Urban – Harrogate p15 8.2 Rural – Harrogate p16 9. Richmondshire p17 9.1 Urban – Richmondshire p18 9.2 Rural – Richmondshire p19 10. Ryedale p20 10.1 Urban – Ryedale p21 10.2 Rural – Ryedale p22 11. Scarborough p23 11.1 Urban – Scarborough p24 11.2 Rural – Scarborough p25 12. Selby p26 12.1 Urban – Selby p27 12.2 Rural – Selby p28 13. Warm Homes Fund Bid p29 13.1 Urban - WHF Bid p30 - 31 13.2 Rural - WHF Bid p32 - 33 14. Data sets p34 Page 2 of 34 Overview YES Energy Solutions has been commissioned by Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire to identify fuel poor households with no central heating facilities in seven Local Authority areas in North Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003
    Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Hambleton District Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Hambleton District Council Area 19 Belonging to North Yorkshire County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Hambleton District Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep
    Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep. Mr Mark Norman Caedmon College Steward Ms Rebecca Hobbs Citizens Advice Steward Mr Jose Roversi Graham School Steward Ms Nicola Laxton Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Steward Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Civic Centre Steward Mrs Julie Biggins Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Steward Mr Andrew Coulthard Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Coulthard Harrogate High School Health & Safety Rep. Mr Garry Frost Harrogate High School Steward Mrs Susan Darling Harrogate High School Steward Mr Garry Frost Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Health & Safety Rep. Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Ms Pauline Wilkinson King James School Steward Mrs Susan Recchia Mowbray School Steward Mrs Rachel Brotherston North Yorkshire Moors National Park Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Muir North Yorkshire Moors National Park Steward Mr Simon Bassindale Northallerton School & Sixth Form College Steward Mr Mark Shepherd Norton College Steward Mr Richard Kellett NYCC - Castle House Steward Mr David Griffiths NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Steward Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Health & Safety Rep. Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC
    [Show full text]
  • Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011
    Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011 Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Methodology 3 3. Key risks to Hambleton from a changing climate 4 4. LCLIP evidence for Hambleton District 4 5. UKCP09 predictions for Hambleton District Council 4 6. Summary of key risks to Hambleton District Council from a changing 5 Climate 7. Hambleton District Council Service Based Comprehensive Risk 8 Assessment 8. Hambleton District Council Climate Adaptation Action Plan 11 9. Conclusion 13 Appendix 1 – Detailed Methodology 14 Appendix 2 – Acknowledgements 15 Acronym: Hambleton District Council - HDC 2 1. Executive summary Services throughout Hambleton District Council will be affected in the future by episodes of weather extremes and Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnership (RIEP) funded two local government officers to come into North Yorkshire Authorities to interview key council department representatives to understand what can be done at a service level to adapt each individual Authority against future disruption which will cost time and money. A weather extreme assessment examining the past five years was carried in 2010 by AECOM to understand past weather extreme events in Hambleton. This report indicates that the great majority of impacts in Hambleton are caused by excessive rainfall (65%) and snow and blizzards (26%). Extreme weather events in Hambleton district have impacts on service delivery and affect different services in both positive and negative ways. The challenge is to proactively work to find solutions to enable services to run continually throughout the year and overall to consider climate change adaptation in the decision making process. During the interview process several positive actions were generated by the individual services which indicates how Hambleton District Council can progress the weather extreme adaptation agenda in the near future to reduce the risk on business continuity and the time and cost constraints associated with a reduce or postponed service.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services
    Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services Claire Wilde <[email protected]> Dear Ms Wilde, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 0254.2018-19 I write in connection with your request for information which was received by North Yorkshire Police on 26 May 2018. I note you seek access to the following information: For each of the three years (2015, 2016, 2017) could I have: 1. The number of crimes reported, broken down by policing district and by crime type; 2. The number of crimes which resulted in charges, broken down by policing district and by crime type. Extent and Result of Searches to Locate Information To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within North Yorkshire Police. I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by North Yorkshire Police. Decision I have today decided to disclose the located information to you. 1. Please find below the number of crimes reported, broken down by crime type and district. Crime District 2015 2016 2017 Total Arson & Criminal Damage Blank 3 8 6 17 Craven District Council 313 273 254 840 Hambleton District Council 469 494 494 1,457 Harrogate Borough Council 912 1,135 1,280 3,327 Richmondshire District Council 266 221 234 721 Ryedale District Council 244 268 227 739 Scarborough Borough council 1,259 1,257 1,192 3,708 Selby District Council 579 543 630 1,752 York City Council 1,590 1,576 1,580 4,746 Arson & Criminal Damage 5,635 5,775 5,897 17,307 Jane Wintermeyer
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire Disability Forum
    North Yorkshire Disability Forum North Yorkshire Disability Forum York CVS, Priory Street, YO1 6ET 11 March 2016 11am – 3.30pm Confirmed minutes Present Andrew Newton (Chair) RipPSI and H/C Disability Forum Shanna Carrell (notes) NYCC Health and Adult Services Nick Jewkes Harrogate Disability Forum Brenda Haw Harrogate Disability Forum Nick Moxon Harrogate Disability Forum Maggie Donnelly RipPSI Bill Chatt Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Bill Busfield Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Tracey Pickering Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Pablo Rees Yorkshire Coast Disability Forum Phil Dodson Selby District Disability Forum Judith Riley Selby District Disability Forum Vanessa Langford Selby District Disability Forum John Atkins Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Sally Anderson NYCC Health and Adult Services Kellie Woodley Inclusion North Julie Fletcher BSL interpreter David Wycherley BSL interpreter Apologies Joe Lennon Selby District Disability Forum Deirdre Edgar Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Nichola Brown Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Roy Emmerson Hambleton & Richmondshire DF Julie Knight NYCIL Page 1 of 10 North Yorkshire Disability Forum 1. Introductions and Welcome Welcome to Nick Moxon, Judith Riley and Vanessa Langford, all of whom are attending the NYDF for the first time. Welcome also to our guests, Sally Anderson and Kellie Woodley. 2. Apologies: as listed on page 1 Declarations of interest: none. 3. Notes of last meeting, 11 December 2015 The minutes were approved as accurate. Matters arising from last meeting: a) Dropped kerbs group: SC to arrange a date for the meeting with Business and Environmental Services. b) SC to circulate contact details for the commissioning team, as suggested by Sue Carty at the meeting in December. c) LGA focus group on 9th March: attended by Maggie, Andrew and Vanessa.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project Case Reference: EN010103 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 April 2019 [This page has been intentionally left blank] ii Scoping Opinion for Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation............................................. 2 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union .......................................... 3 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 4 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ............................................ 4 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ............................................... 5 3. ES APPROACH............................................................................... 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 9 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs)......................................... 9 3.3 Scope of Assessment ..................................................................... 10 3.4 Confidential
    [Show full text]