DOCSLIB.ORG

Like Share Vote Cover 3/11/14 7:03 Pm Page 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Like Share Vote Cover 3/11/14 7:03 Pm Page 1 Like Share Vote cover 3/11/14 7:03 pm Page 1 Across Europe, low voter turnout in European and national VoteLike, Share, | elections is a growing concern. Many citizens are disengaged “A digitally empowered from the political process, threatening the health of our democracies. At the same time, the increasingly prominent role that social media plays in our lives and its function as a civil society could new digital public space offers new opportunities to re- engage non-voters. reconnect Europeans This report explores the potential for social media to ·Louis Reynolds Jamie Bartlett · Jonathan Birdwell support efforts to get out the vote. It lays out which groups need to be the focus of voter mobilisation efforts, and makes the case for using social media campaigning as a core part of with democracy…” our voter mobilisation efforts. The research draws on a series of social media voter mobilisation workshops run by Demos with small third sector organisations in six target countries across Europe, as well as expert interviews, literature review LIKE, SHARE, VOTE and social media analysis. Having affirmed the need for and utility of social media voter turnout efforts, Like, Share, Vote establishes key Jamie Bartlett principles and techniques for a successful social media campaign: how to listen to the digital discourse of your Jonathan Birdwell audience, how to use quizzes and interactive approaches, how Louis Reynolds to micro-target specific groups and how to coordinate offline events with online campaigns. This report concludes that, with more of our social and political lives taking place online than ever before, failing to use social media to reinvigorate our democracy would be a real missed opportunity. Jamie Bartlett is Director of the Centre for the Analysis of Social Media at Demos. Jonathan Birdwell is Head of the Citizenship and Political Participation programme at Demos. Louis Reynolds is a Researcher in the Citizenship and Political Participation programme at Demos. ISBN 978-1-909037-71-7 £10 © Demos 2014 Like Share Vote cover 3/11/14 7:03 pm Page 2 Supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations Demos is Britain’s leading cross-party think tank. We produce original research, publish innovative thinkers and host thought-provoking events. We have spent 20 years at the centre of the policy debate, with an overarching mission to bring politics closer to people. Demos is now exploring some of the most persistent frictions within modern politics, especially in those areas where there is a significant gap between the intuitions of the ordinary voter and political leaders. Can a liberal politics also be a popular politics? How can policy address widespread anxieties over social issues such as welfare, diversity and family life? How can a dynamic and open economy also produce good jobs, empower consumers and connect companies to the communities in which they operate? Our worldview is reflected in the methods we employ: we recognise that the public often have insights that the experts do not. We pride ourselves in working together with the people who are the focus of our research. Alongside quantitative research, Demos pioneers new forms of deliberative work, from citizens’ juries and ethnography to social media analysis. Demos is an independent, educational charity. In keeping with our mission, all our work is available to download for free under an open access licence and all our funders are listed in our yearly accounts. Find out more at www.demos.co.uk First published in 2014 © Demos. Some rights reserved Magdalen House, 136 Tooley Street, London, SE1 2TU, UK ISBN 978 1 909037 71 7 Series design by modernactivity Typeset by Chat Noir Design, Charente Set in Gotham Rounded and Baskerville 10 Cover paper: Flora Gardenia Text paper: Munken Premium White LIKE, SHARE, VOTE Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Louis Reynolds Open access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: · Demos and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org Contents Acknowledgements 7 Executive summary 9 Introduction 15 1 Voter turnout trends in Europe: who needs mobilising? 19 2 Social media and voter mobilisation: does it work? 31 3 The capability gap: making the third sector social media savvy 41 4 Principles and techniques of running a social media voter campaign 49 Conclusion and recommendations 63 Annex: How did Twitter talk about the European elections? 65 Notes 81 References 97 7 Acknowledgments First and foremost we would like to thank Open Society Foundations for their generous support, without which this report would not have been possible. In particular we would like to thank Léonie van Tongeren, Peter Matjasˇicˇ, Heather Grabbe and Nadja Groot for all of their support and feedback during the research. The project would not have been possible without the expert guidance of our Steering Group members. We would like to thank Mike Sani, Nick Anstead, Alberto Nardelli, Megan Bentall, Mevan Babakar, Erin Marie Saltman, Roman Gerodimos, Philippe Marlière, Sarah de Lange, Christian Fuchs, Maria Sobolweska, and Dora Polgar for attending our Steering Group meetings and providing valuable feedback on early drafts of the report. This report would not have been possible without the efforts of key people in the six European countries where we held workshops with third sector organisations. In particular, we would like to thank Peter Kreko, Oscar Moreda Laguna, Clotilde de Gastines, Adrian Chauvin, Sara Prestianni, Sano Lanucara, Paola Micalizzi, Ralph Du Long, and Hazel Nolan. We would also like to thank the many charities, social action groups and third sector organisations that hosted and attended our workshops across Europe. Thanks and gratitude are due to Riccardo Liberatore, Rutger Birnie, Kyriakos Klosidis and Sofia Patel for producing excellent Twitter analysis reports for Italy, Netherlands, Greece and the United Kingdom, respectively. As ever, this report would not be possible without the help and support of our excellent colleagues at Demos. Special thanks are due to Loraine Bussard for helping to organise the workshops, and providing fantastic translation for the French workshop. Special thanks are also due to our colleagues at CASM, Carl Miller and Simon Wibberley at University of Sussex for their help coordinating the Twitter analyses in the case study countries. We also had fantastic support from a very talented group of research interns and assistants, including Peter Acknowledgments Fitzsimons, Kate Kipling, Emma Marshall, Richard Norrie and Chris Waller. Thank you all for your hard work. Thanks also to Alex Krasodomski-Jones for producing our ‘how to’ guide. Last but not least, we would like to thank Rob Macpherson, Daniela Puska and Ralph Scott for guiding the report through the publication process, and Sophie Duder and Alice Meaning for their help in organising the launch event. The views expressed in this report represent those of the authors and not necessarily OSIFE. As ever, any omissions and errors are solely the authors’ own. Jamie Bartlett Jonathan Birdwell Louis Reynolds November 2014 9 Executive summary Electoral turnout is one of the most important indicators of democratic health. Low turnout undermines our democracy.1 In national elections across the European Union, turnout declined from an average of 77 per cent in 1990 to 68 per cent in 2013.2 Turnout in European Parliament elections has fallen further, from 62 per cent in 1979 to only 43 per cent in 2014. While the entry of new states from Central and Eastern Europe accounts for some of this decline, it only partially explains it. Part of the reason for declining voter turnout is that fewer people now trust political parties, join political parties or feel that it is their duty to vote. This is particularly true of younger generations. Yet, these trends do not necessarily suggest there is a loss of interest in politics or social issues by the public: they may instead be indicative of a shift towards new and different forms of political engagement, including online activity. Nevertheless, it is vital that efforts are made to reverse these long-term declines in voter turnout. Social media may provide the answer. There are now almost 295 million social media users in Europe, comprising 40 per cent of the population. Facebook alone boasts 232 million active users. The average European spends around four hours online per day, much of the time on social media platforms.3 More than half of social media users use platforms like Facebook or Twitter to receive news and information.4 We have also seen in the past five years how social media can be used to engage citizens who feel increasingly estranged from the political system. The rise of populist groups in North America (eg the ‘Tea Party’) and Europe, including Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement and other political groups such as the Occupy movement, all demonstrate the political power of social media.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Electoral System Fit for Today? More to Be Done
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 Report of Session 2019–21 An electoral system fit for today? More to be done Ordered to be printed 22 June 2020 and published 8 July 2020 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 83 Select Committee on the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 The Select Committee on the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 was appointed by the House of Lords on 13 June 2019 “to consider post-legislative scrutiny of the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013”. Membership The Members of the Select Committee on the Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013 were: Baroness Adams of Craigielea (from 15 July 2019) Baroness Mallalieu Lord Campbell-Savours Lord Morris of Aberavon (until 14 July 2019) Lord Dykes Baroness Pidding Baroness Eaton Lord Shutt of Greetland (Chairman) Lord Hayward Baroness Suttie Lord Janvrin Lord Wills Lord Lexden Declaration of interests See Appendix 1. A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords- interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/405/electoral-registration-and-administration-act- 2013-committee/publications/ Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The staff who worked on this Committee were Simon Keal (Clerk), Katie Barraclough (Policy Analyst) and Breda Twomey (Committee Assistant).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Electoral Integrity in Britain
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository The Higher Education Impact Agenda, Scientific Realism and Policy Change: the Case of Electoral Integrity in Britain Toby S. James University of East Anglia www.tobysjames.com [email protected] Abstract: Pressures have increasingly been put upon social scientists to prove their economic, cultural and social value through ‘impact agendas’ in higher education. There has been little conceptual and empirical discussion of the challenges involved in achieving impact and the dangers of evaluating it, however. This article argues that a critical realist approach to social science can help to identify some of these key challenges and the institutional incompatibilities between impact regimes and university research in free societies. These incompatibilities are brought out through an autobiographical ‘insider- account’ of trying to achieve impact in the field of electoral integrity in Britain. The article argues that there is a more complex relationship between research and the real world which means that the nature of knowledge might change as it becomes known by reflexive agents. Secondly, the researchers are joined into social relations with a variety of actors, including those who might be the object of study in their research. Researchers are often weakly positioned in these relations. Some forms of impact, such as achieving policy change, are therefore exceptionally difficult as they are dependent on other actors. Strategies for trying to achieve impact are drawn out such as collaborating with civil society groups and parliamentarians to lobby for policy change.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 'Missing Millions' Report by Dr. Toby James, Bite the Ballot, March
    Getting the missing millions back on the electoral register A vision of voter registration reform in the United Kingdom March 2016 Getting the missing millions back on the electoral register Draft Report A vision of voter registration reform in the United Kingdom by Bite The Ballot, ClearView Research and Dr. Toby James for the APPG on Democratic Participation March 2016 DRAFT REPORT This report does not reflect the settled view of the APPG or its Members Foreword “It is a pleasure to open this report as the Liberal Democrat Co-Chair of the APPG on Democratic Participation, not least because it is a genuine ‘all-party’ initiative that happens to be the only Group to include representatives from every party and the Crossbenches. The strongest Groups are reliant on a strong team of interested organisations and individuals to ensure its work makes an impact. I therefore wish to congratulate Bite The Ballot and Dr Toby James for their hard work on this report, and in the area of electoral registration policy more widely. This draft report highlights the fact that voter registration is an issue that should transcend party politics. An effective, accurate and comprehensive registration system is exceptionally important for democracy, and, though the UK has a strong system, there is clearly room for improvement. I must also thank those who attended a roundtable discussion on proposals for reform, which I found to be very constructive. Their ideas and suggestions raised were insightful, original and, crucially, solution-focussed. I sincerely
    [Show full text]
  • Project Fear: How the Negativity of the Referendum Campaign Undermines Democracy
    Project Fear: How the negativity of the referendum campaign undermines democracy blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/06/13/project-fear-how-the-negativity-of-the-referendum-campaign-undermines- democracy/ 13/06/2016 The referendum debate is not living up to its democratic ideals. Both sides of the divide have focused heavily on negative, fear-based arguments to make their case, which prevent democratic engagement among the electorate. Charlotte Galpin shows how this negativity is inhibiting critical reflection and fostering cynicism. She also notes that the debate is non-inclusive, with an striking absence of minorities and female experts in the campaign. Referenda, along with other forms of direct democracy, are seen as an important element of democratic decision-making. They give a voice to the people in key constitutional issues, bringing decision-making to the citizens. Sara Hobolt notes that they have been increasingly used at key moments in European integration, seen as one way to improve EU democracy. Back in 2009 and 2010, the pro-European Liberal Democrats were calling for a referendum on EU membership to ‘settle the arguments’ once and for all, to have an open debate about the pros and cons of membership. So far, the referendum debate is not living up to these democratic ideals. While Vote Leave has accused David Cameron of running Project Fear, both sides have focused heavily on negative, fear-based arguments to make their case –‘Project Fear meets Project Fear’. Fear has long been used as a strategy of negative campaigning. But the fear stories used by both sides of the campaign and in the media prevent democratic engagement with the arguments, create divisions, and foster political cynicism.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Power Report 2
    Electoral WELSH Reform Society POWER Cymru REPORT II THE POWER & VOICE OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN WALES 2 Welsh Power Report II: The Power & Voice of Young People in Wales For more information please contact The Electoral Reform Society Cymru operates the Electoral Reform Society Cymru on a simple premise – that politics can be better than it is. We are campaigning for a better • Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, democracy in Wales, and across the UK. Our Cardiff, CF10 5FH vision is a representative democracy fit for the • Telephone: (029) 2049 6613 21st century. We know that every year that • Email: [email protected] passes with our steam age political system still in place, is a year of missed opportunity for the people of Wales. We believe in a democracy Keep up to date with our work where: • Twitter: @ERS_Cymru • Every vote and every voice has • Facebook: www.facebook.com/ERSWales ABOUT ERS CYMRU MORE INFORMATION value and should be heard; • Web: www.electoral-reform.org.uk/wales • Everyone is able to shape the decisions that affect their lives; • Our institutions reflect the people they serve; • People are able to hold those in power to account; • Politics offers people real alternatives. Steve Brooks is the Director of the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. Dr Owain ap Gareth is the Campaigns & Research Officer for the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. AUTHORS Rhodri Griffiths is a teacher and education advisor to the Electoral Reform Society Cymru. Juliet Swann is the Campaigns & Research Officer for the Electoral Reform Society
    [Show full text]
  • Building Verto the Methodology Behind the Bite the Ballot and Demos Vote Match Tool
    building verto the methodology behind the bite the ballot and demos vote match tool Jonathan Birdwell Charlie Cadywould Louis Reynolds March 2015 Open Access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: . Demos and the author(s) are credited . This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed . The text is not altered and is used in full . The work is not resold . A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos. You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org Partners Credits Commissioned by? Published by Demos March 2015 © Demos. Some rights reserved. Third Floor Magdalen House 136 Tooley Street London SE1 2TU [email protected] www.demos.co.uk 2 INTRODUCTION This document outlines the methodology behind the Bite the Ballot and Demos Voter Advice Tool Verto. A Voter Advice Tool (also known as a Voting Advice Application or VAA) is an online quiz that helps users understand where different political parties stand on key policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Jmlvo.64No.1&2 2017 to Download the Issue
    VOLUME 64 i NUMBERS 1 & 2 Agency From the Editors Marieli Rowe and Karen Ambrosh, Neil Andersen and Carol Arcus ........................................ 2 Henry Jenkins interviewed by Neil Andersen By Neil Andersen .................................................................................. 4 Media Teory 101: Agency By David Buckingham ............................................................................ 12 Agentive Realism and Media Literacy By Michael Dezuanni.............................................................................. 16 Media Literacy, Good Agency: If Jez We Could? By Julian McDougall .............................................................................. 20 Media Literacy Tat Excludes a Planet at Risk is Not Agency By Barrie Zwicker................................................................................. 27 A Fresh Look at the Media Literacy Movement: Te Telemedia Council as an Agent for a Better Future By Marieli Rowe ................................................................................. 34 Te Birth, Death and Resurrection of a Subject Association By Robyn Quin and Barrie McMahon................................................................ 40 Towards a Rights-Based Vision of Digital Literacy By Matthew Johnson .............................................................................. 46 Marshall McLuhan on Agency in Education and Technology Use By Alex Kuskis ................................................................................... 50 Maneuvering Entrenched
    [Show full text]
  • Political Inequality Why British Democracy Must Be Reformed and Revitalised
    REPORT POLITICAL INEQUALITY WHY BRITISH DEMOCRACY MUST BE REFORMED AND REVITALISED Mathew Lawrence April 2014 © IPPR 2014 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in April 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions in this paper are the author’s only. BOLD IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................3 Introduction ........................................................................................................5 1. Political inequality in the UK: Causes, symptoms and routes to renewal ......7 1.1 The first-past-the-post electoral system ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Mentoring of Young People for Responsible Citizenship: a Case Study of an Organisation Using Twitter
    Digital Mentoring of Young People for Responsible Citizenship: A Case Study of an Organisation Using Twitter Tomoaki Miyazaki UCL This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) February 2020 1 Declaration I, Tomoaki Miyazaki, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Word count (exclusive of references and appendix): 77,341 Signature Date: 2 Abstract This research aims to assess qualitatively a social media strategy employed by a UK-based civil society organisation to mobilise young people to political actions, in particular, voting. Conceptualising democracy as full participation in a decision-making process by members of a society, the project chose the organisation, Bite the Ballot (BtB), which aims to encourage young people to vote. While this research focuses on BtB’s Twitter strategy, it is also concerned with how followers learn the importance of voting through their interaction with BtB. To achieve this, an analytical framework was employed to analyse interactions on Twitter. To triangulate the tweet analysis, the research collected two additional data sources: interviews with key informants and document analysis of BtB’s output including its website. In addition, network analysis was used to contextualise BtB’s strategy within the wider network of youth-led organisations which legitimises the selection of the case for this study. The research revealed some evidence that BtB has employed an effective approach in developing democratic skills for responsible citizenship among young people on Twitter. As the BtB strategy appears to be based on young people’s preference fora horizontal relationship rather than a hierarchical relationship, BtB has adopted a mentoring approach to encourage them to vote after discussion on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliamentary and Local Elections Report May 2014
    The European Parliamentary elections and the local government elections in England and Northern Ireland May 2014 Report on the administration of the 22 May 2014 elections July 2014 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large- print or Braille version please contact the Electoral Commission: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] We are an independent body set up by the UK Parliament. We regulate party and election finance and set standards for well-run elections. We work to support a healthy democracy, where elections and referendums are based on our principles of trust, participation, and no undue influence. Contents Foreword 1 1 Introduction About this report and our role 4 About the elections 5 The Commission’s role in encouraging voter registration 8 Key facts and figures 10 2 Were the elections well-run? People’s confidence that the elections were well-run 13 People’s experience of casting their vote 14 Completing the ballot paper 18 Electoral integrity 19 3 Issues Issues arising prior to polling day 23 Delays in legislation 23 Election stationery 25 Party descriptions and emblems 25 Imprints 29 Early despatch of postal votes 30 Campaigners handling postal vote applications 31 Emergency proxies 34 Ballot papers for the European Parliamentary election Voting by EU citizens in the European Parliamentary 34 election 36 Election selfies 38 Allegations of electoral fraud and malpractice in Tower 38 Hamlets The election count in Tower Hamlets
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DECEMBER 2015 Church House, Dean's Yard, Westminster, London
    2015 2015 Recognising the most valued contributions to politics in 2015 1 DECEMBER 2015 Church House, Dean’s Yard, Westminster, London SW1P 3NZ Wiley is pleased to support the Political Studies Association AWARDS Follow us on @WileyPolitics Get sample issues, most cited articles, news on politics and much more at wileyonlinelibrary.com/ subject/politics Proud sponsors of the Sir Isaiah Berlin Prize Discover Routledge A leading publisher in Politics, International Relations and Strategic Studies • Working with prestigious societies and think tanks across the world, such Follow us on Twitter: as the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Chatham House @Rout_PoliticsIR and the Western Political Science Association @RStrategic • The leading publisher of ranked titles across the Thomson Reuters Journal Like us on Facebook: ® www.facebook.com/routledgepolitics Citation Reports Political Science and International Relations categories www.facebook.com/strategicstudies Read the most read articles from 2014 for free in our Year in Review collection: FREE bit.ly/RoutledgeAYIR ACCESS Contents 5 Welcome 6 Lifetime Achievement in Politics 7 Parliamentarian of the Year 8 Best Election Campaigner 9 Rebel of the Year 10 Politician of the Year 11 Influencing Government 12 Democratic Innovation 13 Journalist of the Year 14 Broadcaster of the Year 15 Enlightening the Public 16 Political Satire 17 Sir Isaiah Berlin Prize for Lifetime Contribution to Political Studies 18 Special Recognition Award 19 Political Studies Communicator 20 Research Communicator 21 Innovation in Teaching Politics 22 Lifetime Contribution to Political Studies Association 23 W.J.M. Mackenzie Book Prize 4 Political Studies Association Awards 2015 Welcome It is a pleasure to welcome you to the 2015 Political Studies Association Awards Ceremony.
    [Show full text]
  • Webroots-Democracy-Viral-Voting-2Nd
    1 forewords 3 - 8 executive summary 9 - 12 internet activity in the uk 13 - 20 culture change 21 - 23 twitter and clicktivism 24 - 28 previous uk pilots 29 - 31 global examples 32 - 34 benefits 35 - 43 recent developments 44 - 49 challenges 50 - 52 survey results 53 – 57 references 58 – 61 2 3 Areeq Chowdhury It is time for politics to fast-forward to the present The UK is a politically active nation online, and we and have online voting introduced. need to translate this passion to voting: the bedrock of our democracy. Analogue methods of This report is the work of over a year’s worth of politics will increasingly become incompatible research into the potential of online voting in the with the digital world of today. UK and I am delighted to share the results. Combined with effective marketing and WebRoots Democracy started as a result of integration with social media platforms, I am perceived youth apathy and low voter turnouts, confident that the introduction of an online however over the course of this research it is voting option will significantly increase voter evident that the appeal of online voting is much turnout in the UK. The estimate within this report wider. Online voting has the potential to is that online voting could boost youth voter enfranchise voters currently locked out of the turnout to 70%, up from 44% in the 2010 General current voting methods and will help future-proof Election. elections for an increasingly digital population in the UK. I urge all political parties to commit to introduce an online voting option in elections, as will-power One of the respondents to our survey summed up is the main stumbling block to progress.
    [Show full text]