Final – Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Parcel Map No

October 5, 2018

Don Veasey D&D CAPITAL RESOURCES, LLC 31045 Temecula Parkway, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92592

REGARDING: FINAL – PHASE 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35511, ±2.2 ACRES IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

L&L Environmental, Inc. (L&L) is pleased to present the attached Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment report for your use. The attached report has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Thank you for the opportunity to work with you and please feel free to contact us at 909-335- 9897, should you have any questions or comments. It has been a pleasure working with you!

Sincerely, L&L Environmental, Inc.

Leslie Nay Irish CEO

\\DARWIN\Shared Folders\Server Project Files\UNIFIED PROJECTS\KPA-07-895 San Jacinto Retail Center\2018 ARS\Report\KPA-07-R895.ARS (final).doc

Celebrating 20+ Years of Service to Southern CA and the Great Basin, WBE Certified (Caltrans, CPUC, WBENC) Mailing Address: 700 East Redlands Blvd, Suite U, PMB#351, Redlands CA 92373 Delivery Address: 721 Nevada Street, Suite 307, Redlands, CA 92373 Webpage: llenviroinc.com | Phone: 909-335-9897 | FAX: 909-335-9893

PHASE 1 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 35511 ±2.2 ACRES IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

San Jacinto, CA USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Map Township 4 South, Range 1 West, Section 27

Prepared on Behalf of: D&D Capital Resources, LLC 31045 Temecula Parkway, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92592 Contact: Don Veasey [email protected] 951-217-1230

Prepared For: City of San Jacinto Planning Division 595 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583 951-487-7330

Prepared By: L&L Environmental, Inc. Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA, Principal Investigator William R. Gillean, B.S., Archaeologist Leslie Nay Irish, CEO/Principal Project Manager

Fieldwork Completed By: Shannon M. Smith and William R. Gillean

Fieldwork Date(s): August 6, 2018; August 21, 2018; and September 4, 2018

Report Date: October 5, 2018

Keywords: ±2.2 Acres, Positive Results, 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]), Historic Foundation Remains, State Street, Cottonwood Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle

\\DARWIN\Shared Folders\Server Project Files\UNIFIED PROJECTS\KPA-07-895 San Jacinto Retail Center\2018 ARS\Report\KPA-07-R895.ARS (final).doc

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ...... iii 1.0) INTRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ...... 1 1.1) Introduction ...... 1 1.2) Project Location ...... 1 1.3) Project Description ...... 1 1.4) Cultural Resources Staff ...... 6 1.5) Environmental Setting ...... 6 1.5.1) Existing Land Use/Topography/Geology ...... 6 1.5.2) Vegetation ...... 7 1.5.3) Water Resources ...... 7 2.0) CULTURAL SETTING ...... 8 2.1) Prehistoric Setting ...... 8 2.1.1) Early Period (before 6000 B.C.) ...... 8 2.1.2) Millingstone Period (6000 to 3000 B.C.) ...... 8 2.1.3) Intermediate Period (3000 B.C. to A.D. 500) ...... 9 2.1.4) Late Prehistoric Period (A.D. 500 to A.D. 1769) ...... 9 2.2) Ethnographic Setting ...... 10 2.2.1) Cahuilla ...... 10 2.2.2) Luiseño ...... 11 2.3) Historic Setting ...... 13 2.3.1) Spanish Period (1769 to 1821) ...... 13 2.3.2) Mexican Period (1821 to 1848) ...... 14 2.3.3) American Period (1848 to Present) ...... 14 3.0) REGULATORY SETTING AND METHODS ...... 16 3.1) Regulatory Setting ...... 16 3.1.1) Federal Significance Criteria ...... 17 3.1.2) State Significance Criteria ...... 17 3.1.3) Local Regulations ...... 18 3.2) Methods ...... 21 3.2.1) Cultural Resources Records Search ...... 22 3.2.2) Historic Records Review ...... 22 3.2.3) Native American Coordination ...... 23 3.2.4) Pedestrian Survey ...... 23 4.0) RESULTS ...... 24 4.1) Cultural Resources Records Search ...... 24 4.2) Historic Records Review ...... 41 4.3) Native American Coordination ...... 42 4.4) Pedestrian Survey ...... 46 4.5) Resources Located in the Project Area ...... 48 4.5.1) 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]) ...... 48 4.6) Eligibility Recommendations and Project Impacts ...... 50 4.6.1) 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]) ...... 50 5.0) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 52 5.1) Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains ...... 54 5.2) Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources ...... 54

KPA-07-895.ARS i L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

6.0) REFERENCES CITED ...... 56 7.0) CERTIFICATION ...... 59

APPENDICES Appendix A: Personnel Qualifications ...... 61 Appendix B: EIC Records Search Forms ...... 70 Appendix C: Photographs ...... 73 Appendix D: Sacred Lands Search ...... 76 Appendix E: Native American Coordination ...... 83 Appendix F: DPR 523 Form ...... 96

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map ...... 2 Figure 2. Project Location Map ...... 3 Figure 3. Aerial Photograph ...... 4 Figure 4. Development Plan ...... 5 Figure 5. Survey Coverage in the Project Area ...... 47 Figure 6. Cultural Resources in the Project Area ...... 49 Figure 7. Cultural Resources and Project Impacts ...... 51

LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Located Within 1 Mile of the Project Area ...25 Table 2. Previous Cultural Resources Studies Within 1 Mile of the Project Area ...... 39 Table 3. Summary of Native American Coordination ...... 43

KPA-07-895.ARS ii L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

This report documents a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (CRA) for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 35511. The purpose of this study was to determine if cultural resources more than 45 years old were observable or known within the project area and then evaluate the potential for the proposed project to impact cultural resources. The proposed project would develop a ±2.2 acre project area with a retail center in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. The project area includes Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 434-050-032. L&L Environmental, Inc. (L&L) has completed this CRA at the request of Mr. Don Veasey for D&D Capital Resources, LLC.

A cultural resources records search was completed at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) located at the University of California, Riverside. L&L Archaeologist Shannon M. Smith completed the search on August 3, 2018 and L&L Archaeologist William R. Gillean obtained additional data on August 29, 2018 (Appendix B). The search was completed for the project area and all lands found within one mile. The results indicated that no cultural resources have been recorded within the project area and that the project area was previously surveyed in 2007 with negative findings (RI-7557/L&L 2007). A total of 35 studies have been completed within one mile of the project area and these studies have addressed approximately 15 percent of the land within the search radius. Collectively, these studies have recorded a total of 74 cultural resources.

Records and maps available from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) General Land Office (GLO) were reviewed to provide information about historic era land use and development within the project area (BLM 2018). In addition, archival topographic maps dating between 1952 and 2015 and aerial photographs dating between 1966 and 2014 were reviewed (NETR 2018). The results of the review indicated that the project area was once part of the San Jacinto Viejo land grant (BLM 2018). The review also showed that several structures and possible storage containers or trailers were constructed in the project area between 1972 and 1978. All of these structures and features were removed by 1996. Since this time, the project area has remained vacant, with the exception of a single concrete slab or foundation remnant and an informal driveway or vehicle turnout along the southern edge of the project.

L&L contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requesting a Sacred Lands File database search (SLS). The SLS was requested on July 25, 2018 and August 3, 2018 and a response was received on August 6, 2018 (Appendix D). The NAHC SLS failed to indicate

KPA-07-895.ARS iii L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. However, the NAHC noted that the absence of specific site information does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area and that other resources should be consulted to obtain information regarding known and previously recorded sites. Scoping letters were sent to the 34 contacts listed by the NAHC on August 10 and 13, 2018. On August 14, 2018, three (3) additional scoping letters were sent to updated contacts provided by the Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe.

As of the date of this report, four (4) responses have been received from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI), the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians, and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI). The SMBMI indicated that the proposed project area is located outside of Serrano ancestral territory and that they will not request consulting party status or elect to participate in the scoping, development, and/or review of documents for the project. The Cabazon Band stated that the project is located in an area that may be considered a Traditional Use Area (TUA) and that they had no specific information to indicate that project area may be a sacred/religious site or other site of Native American traditional cultural value. The Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians indicated that their Tribal Historic Preservation Office was not aware of any cultural resources or any Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) within the project area. Finally, the ACBCI stated that the project area is located within the Tribe’s TUA and that they deferred to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians for the project. All coordination efforts are presented in detail in Table 3 of this report and copies of all correspondence are included in Appendix E.

The Phase I pedestrian survey was conducted on August 6, 2018; August 21, 2018; and September 4, 2018. During the pedestrian survey, no prehistoric resources were detected and one (1) historic age archaeological site was encountered and recorded (San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]). Site SJRC-1 consists of one (1) concrete slab/foundation remnant. The foundation remains were detected in an area that corresponds to the location of a structure that was constructed between 1972 and 1978 and removed between 1978 and 1996 (NETR 2018). This indicates that Site SJRC-1 ranges between 40 and 46 years in age and may be historic age for the purposes of CEQA (45 years in age or older when considering an approximate five [5] year planning horizon for the proposed project). Site SJRC-1 was recorded onto a Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Form that was submitted to the EIC. The DPR 523 Form has been incorporated into Appendix F.

To be considered eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources

KPA-07-895.ARS iv L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

(CRHR), a resource must possess integrity and demonstrate eligibility under at least one (1) of the CRHR criteria. 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site SJRC-1) is currently in poor condition and has been adversely impacted by heavy equipment and weed abatement activities. As such, this site does not retain sufficient integrity to be considered eligible for inclusion in the CRHR. Therefore, L&L recommends this site as not eligible for inclusion in the CRHR and not significant pursuant to CEQA. This resource is located within the development footprint and it will be directly impacted by the proposed project. Recordation onto a DPR 523 Form exhausts the site’s research value and no further work is recommended for this resource prior to project implementation.

Based on the results of a records search completed at the EIC; a previous survey addressing the project area in 2007 (L&L 2007); and pedestrian surveys, recordation, and evaluation efforts completed by L&L in 2018, no known historical or archaeological resources pursuant to CEQA are located in the project area. In addition, the NAHC SLS and the information scoping process failed to yield any information about the presence of Native American resources in or adjacent to the project area. These findings, in conjunction with previous soil disturbances in the project area, render it unlikely that intact, subsurface archaeological deposits will be detected during project implementation. For this reason, the project area appears to have a moderate to low sensitivity for historic age and prehistoric archaeological resources and an archaeological mitigation-monitoring program is not recommended during project implementation.

In the event that previously unknown resources are encountered during any project-related ground disturbance, ground-disturbing activity should cease within 100 feet of the resource and a professional archaeologist shall be consulted to assess the find and to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified archeological personnel shall assist the Lead Agency by generating measures to protect the discovered resources commensurate with their significance (see Section 5.2).

KPA-07-895.ARS v L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

1.0) INTRODUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

1.1) Introduction

The following report documents a Phase I CRA for TPM No. 35511 and was completed in accordance with CEQA. This report follows the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) procedures for cultural resource surveys and is generally based on the OHP Archaeological Resource Management Report (ARMR) format (OHP 1990).

1.2) Project Location

The proposed project is generally located in the northwestern portion of Riverside County, California, and is situated south of State Route 60 and west of State Route 79 (Figure 1). Specifically, it can be found within Section 27 of Township 4 South, Range 1 West as shown on the USGS San Jacinto, CA 7.5’ topographic quadrangle map (Figure 2). The project is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Cottonwood Avenue and State Street in the City of San Jacinto (Figure 3). The project site consists of APN 434-050-032 and measures ±2.2 acres.

1.3) Project Description

The proposed project includes the construction of a retail center consisting of three (3) buildings and associated parking within the ±2.2 acre project area. The development plan is shown in relation to the project area boundary in Figure 4.

KPA-07-895.ARS 1 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Project Vicinity

L&L Environmental, Inc. Figure 1

BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING Project Vicinity Map

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 2 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Project Area

L&L Environmental, Inc. Figure 2

BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL Project Location Map (USGS San Jacinto [1979] quadrangle, INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING Section 27, Township 4 South, Range 1 West)

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 3 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Project Area

State State Street

Cottonwood Avenue

L&L Environmental, Inc. Figure 3

BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL Aerial Photograph INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING (Photo obtained from Google Earth, February 2018)

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 4 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Project Area

L&L Environmental, Inc. Figure 4

BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING Development Plan

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 5 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

1.4) Cultural Resources Staff

The cultural resources records search was conducted on August 3, 2018 at the EIC by L&L Archaeologist Shannon M. Smith, B.S. Additional data was obtained from the EIC by L&L Archaeologist William R. Gillean, B.S. on August 29, 2018 (Appendix B). S. Smith completed the pedestrian survey on August 6 and 21, 2018 and W. Gillean conducted additional survey efforts on September 4, 2018. L&L Archaeologist Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA authored the CRA with contributions from W. Gillean. L&L CEO/Principal Project Manager Leslie Irish provided quality control oversight for the project and J. Sanka served as the Principal Investigator.

Professional qualifications for all team members are located in Appendix A.

1.5) Environmental Setting

1.5.1) Existing Land Use/Topography/Geology

The project area is located in a portion of the City known to contain historic buildings as outlined in Figure RM-4 (Cultural Resources) of the San Jacinto General Plan (GP) (San Jacinto 2012). The presence of historic buildings in the general vicinity of the project area is further outlined by the results of the EIC records search (see Section 4.1). The project area once exhibited structures and features that were constructed in the 1970s; however, they were removed by 1996. Since this time, the project area has remained vacant, with the exception of a single concrete slab or foundation remnant and an informal driveway or vehicle turnout along the southern edge of the project (NETR 2018).

Lands surrounding the project area are generally characterized by alternating residential and commercial development with minimal undeveloped areas. The project area is bound to the north by a plowed vacant field, to the east by State Street, and to the south by Cottonwood Avenue. These boundaries are followed by undeveloped lands and residential properties. The western boundary consists of a cinder-block wall and an established mobile home park.

Elevation within the project area is approximately 1,530 feet above mean sea level. The entirety of the project area soils are mapped as San Emigdio fine sandy loam (SfA and SeA) (NRCS 2018). Geologic mapping indicates that the project area is situated on surficial soils mapped as alluvial sand and clay of valley areas from the Holocene (Qa) (Dibblee and Minch 2003; L&L 2018).

KPA-07-895.ARS 6 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

1.5.2) Vegetation

The project area has been subject to periodic and recent mowing or disking. As a result, the existing vegetation is generally sparse. Non-native vegetation is present within the central portion of the project area.

1.5.3) Water Resources

The San Jacinto River is located about 2.30 miles to the north and 2.00 miles to the east of the project area, while the San Jacinto Reservoir is situated 1.25 miles to the northwest.

KPA-07-895.ARS 7 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

2.0) CULTURAL SETTING

2.1) Prehistoric Setting

The following section provides a brief discussion on the prehistoric and historic setting to provide a context for understanding the relevance of resources found in the general vicinity of the project area. Additional information can be found in ethnographic studies, mission records, and major published sources, including Kroeber (1925), Wallace (1955), Warren (1968), Heizer (1978), Moratto (1984), Chartkoff and Chartkoff (1984), Fagan (2003), and Jones and Klar (2007).

The purpose of establishing a cultural sequence is to allow for the meaningful comparison of material culture attributes on an intra- and inter-site basis and to provide the basis for culture- model building. To this end, regional archaeologists often follow Wallace’s southern California format (1955 and 1978) for discussing the prehistoric chronology of the project area. Wallace’s prehistoric format is as follows:

• Early Period (before 6000 B.C.) • Millingstone Period (6000 to 3000 B.C.) • Intermediate Period (3000 B.C. to A.D. 500) • Late Prehistoric Period (A.D. 500 to A.D. 1769)

2.1.1) Early Period (before 6000 B.C.)

Beginning with the first human presence in California, prehistoric artifacts and cultural activities appear to represent a big-game hunting tradition. Very few sites from the Early Period exist, especially in inland areas. Of the Early Period sites that have been excavated and dated, most exhibit a refuse assemblage suggesting short-term occupation. Such sites have been detected in caves and around fluvial lakes fed by streams that existed near the end of the last glaciation. Chipped stone tools at these sites are surmised to reflect a specialized tool kit used by hunters. Large-stemmed bifaces are common. Millingstones and dart points are not part of the Early Period tool assemblage (Wallace 1955).

2.1.2) Millingstone Period (6000 to 3000 B.C.)

Characterized by the appearance of handstones and millingstones, the onset of the Millingstone Period appears to correspond with an interval of warm and dry weather known as the

KPA-07-895.ARS 8 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Altithermal (Wallace 1978). Artifact assemblages begin to reflect an emphasis on plant foods and foraging subsistence systems, as evidenced by the grinding tools found at these sites. Assemblages also include choppers and scraper planes; however, there is a reduced number of large bifaces. Sites are occupied for a greater duration than Early Period sites, based on an increase in occupational debris. The distribution of Millingstone Period sites reflects the theory that groups may have followed a modified central-based wandering settlement pattern. In this semi-sedentary pattern, a base camp would have been occupied for a portion of the year, but small population groups seasonally occupied subsidiary camps in order to exploit resources not generally available near the base camp. Sedentism apparently increased in areas possessing an abundance of resources that were available for longer periods. More arid inland regions would have provided a seasonally dispersed resource base, restricting sedentary occupation (Wallace 1955).

2.1.3) Intermediate Period (3000 B.C. to A.D. 500)

Dating between roughly 3000 B.C. and A.D. 500, the Intermediate Period represents a slow technological transition, which is presumably related to the slowly drying and warming climate. Site artifact assemblages retain many attributes of the Millingstone Period. Technologically, these sites are difficult to distinguish from earlier sites in the absence of radiometric dates. Additionally, these sites generally contain a reduced number of large-stemmed or notched projectile points, but there is an increase in portable mortars and pestles. The lack of large points, combined with the mortars and pestles, suggest that the indigenous populations may have preferred harvesting, processing, and consuming acorns and other seeds over hunting. Due to a general lack of data, neither the settlement and subsistence systems nor the cultural evolution of this period are well understood. It has been proposed by some researchers that group sedentism increased with the exploitation of storable, high-yield plant food resources, such as acorns. The duration and intensity of occupation at base camps increased during this period, especially in the later part of the period (Wallace 1955).

2.1.4) Late Prehistoric Period (A.D. 500 to A.D. 1769)

Extending from about A.D. 500 to Spanish contact in A.D. 1769, the Late Prehistoric Period reflects an increased sophistication and diversity in technology. Cultural complexes appeared that have modern ethnographic counterparts. Occupation sites consisted of major villages with cemeteries, as well as “special purpose” and seasonal sites. Village sites are common. Late assemblages characteristically contain small projectile or dart points, which imply the use of the bow and arrow. Use of bedrock milling stations is purported to have been widespread during

KPA-07-895.ARS 9 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 this period, as it was in the previous period. Increased hunting efficiency and widespread exploitation of acorns provided reliable and storable food resources. Desert series projectile points, buffware and brownware ceramics, shell, steatite beads, slate pendants, incised stones, and milling tools constitute the tool assemblage. Regional differences, such as Cottonwood Projectile Points, were common and the use of obsidian increased in some areas and decreased in others (Wallace 1955).

2.2) Ethnographic Setting

The project area is located in an ethnographic transition region adjacent to the borders of the TUAs of the Cahuilla and Luiseño. The project area is situated along the western edge of an area that is associated with the Cahuilla (Bean 1978; San Jacinto 2012) and the northeastern edge of an area that is associated with the Luiseño (Bean and Shipek 1978). This section focuses on the Cahuilla and Luiseño as the entities most closely associated with the project area.

2.2.1) Cahuilla

The Cahuilla TUA is vast, with borders extending southeast from the modern City of Riverside in the north to Borrego Springs in the south. From Borrego Springs, the border trends east below the Santa Rosa Mountains, bisecting the Salton Sea, and further inland past the Chocolate Mountains. The Cahuilla northern border then trends southeast from near the modern City of Riverside in the west, along the southern margin of the San Bernardino Mountains to beyond the Chocolate Mountains in the east (Bean 1978).

The Cahuilla belong to the Shoshonean linguistic family and have had definitive historical relationships with the Hopi of Arizona, the Gabrieliño, and Digueño of the southern California coast and the Luiseño of Riverside County, as well as other desert tribes such as the Kamia, Chemehuevi, Paiute, and Serrano. The Cahuilla population prior to Spanish contact could have been as numerous as 6,000 persons in an area encompassing more than 2,400 square miles (Bean 1978; Strong 1972; Bean and Saubel 1979).

Villages were determined according to their proximity to a defined water source and access to a food-gathering locale. Village sites were usually located near alluvial fans, streams, or at the base of mountains for protection against the winds. In the desert, some settlements were located around hand dug wells and watering holes. The Cahuilla can be discussed according to their primary village locality: Desert Cahuilla, Mountain Cahuilla, and Valley Cahuilla. Typically,

KPA-07-895.ARS 10 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 a clan or family occupied several food-gathering locations and guarded these areas against other Cahuilla clans (Bean 1972; Bean 1978; Oswalt 1988; Strong 1972).

Cahuilla homes were generally constructed with forked posts, which supported wood ceiling beams. These structures were completely covered in thatch, which was slightly mixed with sand or soil. In some cases, the floor was slightly subterranean and each house was positioned so that a level of privacy was attained (Bean 1978; Kroeber and Hooper 1978). Wilke (1978) notes that the Cahuilla homes were generally hidden in mesquite groves, which effectively obscured them from plain view.

The pottery associated with the Cahuilla has been stylistically and ornamentally compared to that of an ancient Pueblo style, as well as to the Colorado River Indians, the Digueño, Luiseño, and Mohave (Bean and Lawton 1975; Kroeber and Hooper 1978). It is constructed in coil form, and then shaped with a polishing stone and wooden paddle to be baked or fired in the sun. In many cases, their pottery was incised for decoration (Bean and Lawton 1975; Kroeber and Hooper 1978). Kroeber and Hooper (1978) suggest that the Cahuilla had four (4) definitive pottery forms: an open bowl or dish, a cooking pot, a small-rimmed vessel, and a wider opening rimmed vessel; while Bean and Lawton (1975) suggest that ladles, trays, and pipes were also manufactured. Baskets were also an important item to a Cahuilla clan and were typically made in a variety of shapes and sizes, but always produced from a coil of mesquite branches, willow, or palm leaves. Grasses were used in the foundation and the only tool used to manufacture these baskets was a needle. These needles were either fashioned from the leg bone of a deer or made from a heavy cactus needle set into a wooden handle (Bean 1978).

Ceremony and ritual was of great importance to the Cahuilla (Bean 1978). Deep ceremonial ties existed between the Serrano and the Cahuilla, and it is thought that the Desert Cahuilla may have adopted certain ceremonial practices from the Serrano (Strong 1972). Frequently practiced ceremonies include multiple rituals for the mourning of the dead, the eagle dance, summer and winter solstice celebrations, and separate initiation rites for boys and girls (Strong 1972).

2.2.2) Luiseño

The project area is located near the northeastern-most extent of an area that is affiliated with the Luiseño, a Tribe associated with San Luis Rey Mission. Luiseño territory consisted of approximately 1,500 square miles, extending from Agua Hedionda in the south to Aliso Creek in the northwest, inland to Santiago Peak across the eastern side of the Elsinore Fault Valley,

KPA-07-895.ARS 11 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 southward to the east of Palomar Mountain, and around the southern slope above the Valley of San Jose (Bean and Shipek 1978). This area covered every ecological zone and provided a vast amount of resources for the people.

Villages included the occupation of a sedentary village site within subsistence territories that permitted the inhabitants to reach the majority of their resources within a day’s walk. Villages were commonly located along valley bottoms, streams, or coastal strands in areas with abundant resources and defensive locations. During October and November, much of the village population moved to temporary camps in the mountains to harvest acorns and hunt game. Inland groups also had fishing and gathering spots on the coast that they visited annually. Primary subsistence resources included deer, rabbit, woodrat, mice and ground squirrels, quail, duck, and other fowl. Trout, fish, crustaceans, and mollusks could be utilized in coastal areas and mountain streams. Plant resources were also important, the acorn being the most utilized. Other important plant resources included grass seeds, manzanita, sunflower, sage, chia, lamb’s quarters, and pine nuts. Various greens, cactus pods and fruits, berries, and yucca, as well as mushrooms, bulbs, roots, and tubers were also part of the everyday diet. Tobacco and datura, also known as Jimson weed, toloache, or náqtumuš, were used in sacred rituals.

The Luiseño appear to have maintained a high population density and a more rigid social structure. According to Bean and Shipek (1978), each village was a clan tribelet—a group of people patrilineally related who owned an area in common and who were politically and economically autonomous from neighboring groups. There was a hereditary village chief that was responsible for ceremonial, economic, and warfare issues. Also involved in the political makeup of the group was a council of ritual specialists and shamans whose positions were hereditary, often with the successor coming from a specific lineage. The cult Chingichngish was very important to the spiritual leaders as well and they were allotted special access to ritual and supernatural power forms.

Cultural patterns may have been relatively stable until mission secularization in 1834, which included a policy of the Catholic Mission fathers to maintain imported European traditional style settlement and economic patterns (Bean and Shipek 1978). The secularization resulted in political imbalance, revolts, and uprisings against the Mexican rancheros.

KPA-07-895.ARS 12 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

2.3) Historic Setting

The historic period (post-contact) in southern California is commonly presented in terms of Spanish, Mexican, and American political domination. Certain themes are common to all periods, such as the development of transportation, military activities, settlement, and agriculture.

2.3.1) Spanish Period (1769 to 1821)

The first Europeans to traverse the territory that comprises modern Riverside County were Spanish soldier Pedro Fages and Father Francisco Garcés. This expedition to locate deserting soldiers brought the group through the foothills of the San Jacinto Mountains and along Coyote Canyon on the southern edge of Riverside County. They then continued into the Anza Valley, the San Jacinto Valley, Riverside, and eventually into San Bernardino, and the Cajon Pass. Later, in 1774, Captain Juan Bautista de Anza would also utilize Coyote Canyon and enter the confines of modern Riverside County as his expedition searched for an overland route from Sonora to coastal southern California. These expeditions sparked an influx of non-natives to southern California and the first of these groups were the Spanish. Associated with the Spanish migration is the establishment of missions and military presidios along the coast of California. Between 1769 and 1823, Spanish explorers and missionaries established 21 missions, four (4) presidios, and four (4) pueblos between San Diego and Sonoma (Bean and Rawls 1983). While the missions and presidios were not located within modern Riverside County, their influence was far-reaching. Lands within modern Riverside County were utilized for agriculture and pasturage under the supervision of the Mission San Gabriel and the Mission San Luis Rey (Lech 2004).

In the late 18th century, the missions began establishing ranchos for the purpose of expanding their agricultural holdings. The establishment of the ranchos is important to the development of the area as a center of mission activity for inland southern California and it encouraged population expansion into modern Riverside County lands. The Mission San Gabriel established the San Bernardino, San Gorgonio, and Jurupa Ranchos, while the Mission San Luis Rey established the Temecula and San Jacinto Ranchos (Lech 2004). The San Jacinto Rancho included lands in the San Jacinto Valley and was used as a vast cattle ranch (CRM Tech 2005; San Jacinto 2012; San Jacinto 2018b).

KPA-07-895.ARS 13 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

2.3.2) Mexican Period (1821 to 1848)

By the early decades of the 19th century, the growth of Spanish California had come to a halt. Embroiled in the Napoleonic wars and a subsequent struggle to evade French rule, Spain was unable to effectively rule its North American colonies. In 1821, and after more than a decade of revolutionary struggle, Mexico achieved independence from Spain and California became a distant outpost of the Mexican Republic. Following Mexican Independence, the secularization of the missions and the mission holdings took place over the next decade and the former mission lands were transferred to prominent Mexican families.

For the lands that once comprised the San Jacinto Rancho, the Mexican authorities created three (3) large land grants during the 1840s (CRM Tech 2005). Trending from east to west, these grants included the Rancho San Jacinto Viejo, the Rancho San Jacinto Nuevo y Potrero, and the Rancho El Sobrante de San Jacinto. The Rancho San Jacinto Viejo was granted to Jose Antonio Estudillo in 1842 (San Jacinto 2012; San Jacinto 2018b). This grant included about 35,000 acres and it encompassed the modern towns of Hemet, San Jacinto, Valle Vista (Florida), and Winchester (Pleasant Valley) (Perris 2005; San Jacinto 2012). The Rancho San Jacinto Viejo also included the project area and was used to graze cattle (Perris 2005; BLM 2018).

2.3.3) American Period (1848 to Present)

The Mexican Period formally ends in 1848, following the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This event marked the end of the Mexican-American War and ceded the northern provinces of Mexico to the United States. The following decades saw an influx of American settlers to the region, sparked by the discovery of gold, agricultural possibilities, and land speculation. Rancho lands were subdivided and sold during this period to the incoming settlers.

For the lands that comprised the Rancho San Jacinto Viejo, Jose Antonio Estudillo endeavored to sell off portions of his 35,500 acre rancho and establish a town (L&L 2007; San Jacinto 2012). Estudillo’s descendants began selling off acreage to American settlers from the east coast in the late 1860s and by 1868, a community had developed near the San Jacinto River. A school district was established in 1869 and the first general store was opened in 1870 by a Russian immigrant named Procco Akimo. Also in 1870, San Jacinto’s first post office was in operation (San Jacinto 2018b).

KPA-07-895.ARS 14 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

In 1883, speculators from Los Angeles established a second townsite just over a mile away from the existing community. These investors organized the San Jacinto Land Association, purchased 15,000 acres of the former rancho lands, and created New San Jacinto. Thereafter, a battle for civic dominance ensued between New and Old San Jacinto. The struggle was finally settled in 1888 when the Santa Fe Railroad constructed a branch line into the San Jacinto Valley from Perris. The terminus of the rail-line was located on the west side of the New San Jacinto townsite on land donated by Jose Estudillo’s son, Francisco. The proximity of the branch line to New San Jacinto quickly led to increased development at the townsite and the ultimate demise of Old San Jacinto. On April 9, 1888, the City of San Jacinto was incorporated and it is the oldest incorporated City in Riverside County (San Jacinto 2012; San Jacinto 2018b).

During the final decades of the 19th century, San Jacinto’s economy shifted from cattle ranching to agricultural pursuits. Apricots and walnuts were produced, as well as several varieties of citrus. Prior to World War I, dairy farms, turkey ranches, and lime kilns began to appear. Tourism added to the local economy in the 20th century, as existing hot springs spurred the construction and development of resorts at Gilman, Soboba, and Eden Hot Springs (San Jacinto 2018b). As of 2014, the City of San Jacinto maintained a population of 45,563 and boasted job opportunities in the manufacturing sector, as well as the non-manufacturing sectors of agriculture, retail, and other support services (San Jacinto 2018a).

KPA-07-895.ARS 15 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

3.0) REGULATORY SETTING AND METHODS

3.1) Regulatory Setting

Government agencies, including federal, state, and local agencies, have developed laws and regulations designed to protect significant cultural resources that may be affected by projects regulated, funded, or undertaken by an agency. Under CEQA, public agencies must consider the effects of their actions on both historical resources and unique archaeological resources. Pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21084.1, a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 21083.2 requires agencies to determine whether proposed projects would have effects on unique archaeological resources.

Historical resource is a term with a defined statutory meaning (see PRC, Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a) and (b)). The term embraces any resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing on the CRHR. The CRHR includes resources listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), as well as some California Historical Landmarks (CHLs) and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHIs).

Properties of local significance that have been designated under a local preservation ordinance (local landmarks or landmark districts) or that have been identified in a local historical resources inventory may be eligible for listing in the CRHR and are presumed to be historical resources for purposes of CEQA unless a preponderance of evidence indicates otherwise (PRC, Section 5024.1 and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 4850). Unless a resource listed in a survey has been demolished, lost substantial integrity, or there is a preponderance of evidence indicating that it is otherwise not eligible for listing, a Lead Agency should consider the resource to be potentially eligible for the CRHR.

In addition to assessing whether historical resources potentially impacted by a proposed project are listed or have been identified in a survey process, Lead Agencies have a responsibility to evaluate them against the CRHR criteria prior to making a finding as to a proposed project’s impacts to historical resources (PRC, Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064(a)(3)). The following criteria were used to evaluate the significance of potential impacts to cultural resources for the proposed project. An impact would be considered significant if the proposed project affects the qualities that render a resource eligible for listing in the NRHP or

KPA-07-895.ARS 16 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 the CRHR.

3.1.1) Federal Significance Criteria

Evaluation of a resource for listing on the NRHP requires that specific elements be addressed: the criteria of significance and the integrity of the property.

Regulations found in Title 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 60.4 list the criteria for evaluating site significance for listing on the NRHP. Following the standards and guidelines, resources are considered significant if they meet at least one (1) of four (4) significance criteria (A-D), retain integrity, and are at least 50 years old. In rare cases, sites may be considered significant if they are of exceptional value and do not meet any other requirements. The criteria for determining the significance of a property are as follows:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:

A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or

B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or

C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or

D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or history.

In addition to meeting one (1) of the significance criteria listed above, a property must also demonstrate a sufficient degree of integrity so that it is capable of conveying such significance (Hardesty and Little 2000). The seven (7) elements of integrity identified by the NRHP include location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (NPS 1991).

3.1.2) State Significance Criteria

Given that the CRHR was modeled after the NRHP, it has very similar eligibility criteria. Generally, to be considered significant under CEQA, a resource must possess integrity and demonstrate eligibility under at least one (1) of the following criteria (California Code of Regulations 15064.5):

KPA-07-895.ARS 17 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;

2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;

3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

4. Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

As noted above, CEQA also requires Lead Agencies to consider whether projects will impact unique archaeological resources. PRC Section 21083.2(g) states that a unique archaeological resource is an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:

• Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information;

• Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type; or

• Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.

Treatment options under Section 21083.2 include activities that preserve such resources in place and in an undisturbed state. Other acceptable methods of mitigation under Section 21083.2 include excavation and curation or study in place without excavation and curation (if the study finds that the artifacts would not meet one [1] or more of the criteria for defining a unique archaeological resource).

3.1.3) Local Regulations

The City of San Jacinto has addressed cultural resources in the Resource Management Element of the GP (San Jacinto 2012). The City has established the following Goal, Policies, and Implementation Program for cultural resources:

Resource Management Goal 4: Promote cultural awareness through the preservation of the City's historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources.

Policy 4.1: Wherever possible, identify, protect, and preserve the historical resources of the City.

KPA-07-895.ARS 18 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Policy 4.2: Encourage historic preservation in the downtown core.

Policy 4.3: Increase public awareness of and accessibility to the City's cultural heritage and resources through educational visitor-oriented programs.

Policy 4.4: Ensure new development is compatible with and complementary to adjacent historic resources.

Implementation Program (Cultural Resources):

RM-16 (CEQA): Continue to assess development proposals for potential impacts to sensitive historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA.

a. For structures that potentially have historic significance, the City shall require that a study be conducted by a professional archaeologist or historian to determine the actual significance of the structure and potential impacts of the proposed development in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The City may require modification of the project and/or mitigation measures to avoid any impact to a historic structure, when feasible, such as retaining or rehabilitating historic buildings pursuant to City of San Jacinto guidelines. If a historic building cannot be avoided by a project associated with the proposed GP, the significant historic building may be relocated to avoid impacting the structure. (See Implementation Program RM-19).

b. For all development proposals within areas with the potential to contain prehistoric/historic resources, the City shall require a study to be conducted by a professional archaeologist. The objective of the study will be to determine if significant archaeological resources are potentially present and if the project will significantly impact these resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid the impacts or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts. Mitigation may involve archaeological investigation and resources recovery.

c. The City shall require an assessment of the potential for development proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. If the project involves earthworks, the City may require a study conducted by a professional paleontologist to determine if paleontological assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If

KPA-07-895.ARS 19 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid impacting the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontologic resources, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation.

d. The City shall make provisions for archeological resources accidentally discovered during construction, or when the City does not have approval authority over the project, encourage the Lead Agency to make such provisions. These provisions shall include an immediate evaluation of the find and contingency funding and time allotment sufficient to allow for the recovery of the archeological resource or implement measures to avoid disturbing the resource if the archeological resource is determined to be unique.

e. In the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, the City shall halt excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner has been informed and has determined that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the remains are of Native American origin, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the descendants from the deceased Native Americans have made a recommendation to the landowner or the persons responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods as provided in PRC Section 5097.98, or the NAHC was unable to identify a descendant or the descendant failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the NAHC.

f. Prior to adopting any GP, Specific Plan (SP), or any amendment thereto, the City shall notify appropriate Tribes of the opportunity for consultation for the purpose of preserving, or mitigating impacts to, cultural places located on land within the City’s jurisdiction that may be affected by the proposed plan or amendment.

g. Prior to the adoption or substantial amendment of a GP or SP, the City shall

KPA-07-895.ARS 20 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

refer the proposed action to those Tribes that are on the NAHC contact list and have traditional lands located within the City’s jurisdiction for a 45 day comment period. In addition, at least 10 days prior to a public hearing, the City shall send notice to Tribes that have filed a written request for such notice.

h. Prior to designating open space, the City shall consult with Tribes if the affected land contains a cultural place and if the affected Tribe has requested public notice under Government Code Section 65092.

RM-17 (Promote Historic Sites): Promote public awareness and encourage tourism in the City by actively identifying and enhancing the community’s many historic resources through the location of historic landmark plaques and a Historic Tour Guide. Promote tours of these sites on the City’s and other organization’s websites.

RM-18 (Estudillo Mansion): Continue to support the improvement and enhancement of the Estudillo Mansion and expand opportunities for public access and use of the historic treasure.

RM-19 (Downtown Historic Preservation): Develop and implement architectural standards and historical preservation guidelines for development and redevelopment in the downtown core of the community. Use housing and façade rehabilitation programs to support development and redevelopment activities that preserve and complement historic structures and resources in the downtown.

RM-20 (Historic Protection Incentive Programs): Develop and implement programs and/or incentives to private property owners to help preserve, restore, or reuse historic structures while enhancing their historical significance and integrity.

RM-21 (Historic Properties Inventory): Conduct a historic properties inventory that takes into consideration buildings, neighborhoods, and other features of historic, architectural, or cultural significance.

3.2) Methods

The primary purpose of this CRA is to determine whether cultural resources more than 45 years old are located within or near the project area and whether these resources will be or could be impacted by the proposed project. To accomplish this, research and a pedestrian survey were

KPA-07-895.ARS 21 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 conducted. The results of these efforts assist in determining if resources are present and, if present, considered eligible for inclusion in the NRHP, CRHR, or local designation. This allows for the consideration of the impacts of the proposed project on cultural resources, including resources considered significant under the parameters of the Regulatory Setting. The assessment included the following tasks:

• Review of regional history and previous cultural resource sites and studies within the project area and the vicinity.

• Examination of archival topographic maps and aerial photographs for the project area and the general vicinity.

• Request of an NAHC SLS for the project area and contact with Tribal groups and individuals as named by the NAHC.

• Conduct a non-collection Phase I pedestrian survey of the project area.

• Prepare a new DPR 523 Form for Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1).

• Submit the DPR 523 Form to the EIC for their files and to obtain a Primary Number/Trinomial for Site SJRC-1 (33-28508/CA-RIV-12844).

• Evaluate the potential for the proposed project to result in significant impacts to cultural resources.

• Develop recommendations associated with impacts to cultural resources following the guidelines as outlined in the Regulatory Setting.

3.2.1) Cultural Resources Records Search

A records search was conducted by L&L Archaeologist Shannon M. Smith on August 3, 2018 and additional information was obtained by L&L Archaeologist William R. Gillean on August 29, 2018 (Appendix B). The records search consisted of a check for previously recorded cultural resource sites and isolates and previous cultural resources studies on or within a one mile radius of the project area. In addition, the records search included a review of the NRHP, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (ADOE), and the OHP Historic Property Data File (HPDF).

3.2.2) Historic Records Review

Information available from the BLM was reviewed, including maps and GLO records pertinent to the project area (BLM 2018). In addition, archival topographic maps and aerial photographs containing the project area were reviewed (NETR 2018).

KPA-07-895.ARS 22 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

3.2.3) Native American Coordination

A request was sent to the NAHC asking for an SLS and a Tribal contacts list on July 25, 2018 and August 3, 2018. A response was received on August 6, 2018 (Appendix D). The NAHC contacts were sent project location information and were asked for their potential concerns regarding the project area. The information scoping packages were sent to the 34 contacts listed by the NAHC on August 10 and 13, 2018. On August 14, 2018, three (3) additional scoping letters were sent to updated contacts provided by the Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe (Appendix E). All coordination efforts are summarized in Table 3 of this report and copies of correspondence are included in Appendix E.

3.2.4) Pedestrian Survey

The primary purpose of the pedestrian survey is to locate and document previously recorded or new cultural resource sites or isolates that are more than 45 years old within the project area, and to determine whether such resources will be or could be impacted by project implementation. The entire project area (100 percent) was surveyed on August 6, 2018; August 21, 2018; and September 4, 2018 via east-west trending transects at intervals of no more than 10 meters. During the survey, digital photographs were taken to document existing conditions.

If previously unrecorded resources were detected during the survey, they would be measured, photographed, and mapped in the field. Location information would be obtained for all resources via Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). All data obtained in the field would be used to record resources onto DPR 523 Forms.

KPA-07-895.ARS 23 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

4.0) RESULTS

4.1) Cultural Resources Records Search

L&L Archaeologist Shannon M. Smith conducted the records search on August 3, 2018 and L&L Archaeologist William R. Gillean obtained additional data on August 29, 2018 (Appendix B). The records search was completed for the project area and all lands found within one mile. The results indicated that no cultural resources have been recorded within the project area and that the entirety of the project area was previously surveyed in 2007 with negative findings (RI- 7557/L&L 2007). The results additionally revealed that a total of 74 cultural resources have been recorded within the one mile search radius. Of these previously recorded resources, 10 are located within 0.25 mile of the project area, 15 are located within 0.25 and 0.50 mile of the project area, and 49 are located between 0.50 mile and one mile of the project area.

The identified resources consist of 74 historic resources and no prehistoric sites or isolated finds. The historic resources are predominately buildings or building compounds (n=70), with the majority of the buildings serving as residences that were built between c. 1880 and 1932 (n=58). The other buildings are commercial properties (n=6), such as hotels (Pioneer Hotel/Virginia Lee Hotel and Hotel Vosburg) and a sewing supplies store (Bosman’s Sewing Barn); churches (n=2); farm or ranch buildings (n=2); the San Jacinto Forest Fire Station (n=1); and a complex containing approximately 20 buildings and structures built between the 1940s and the 1950s (n=1). The remaining historic resources include the San Jacinto Railway (n=1) and three (3) historic archaeological sites. The sites exhibit refuse and building remains associated with farms or ranches (n=2) and a refuse deposit at the mapped location of Francisco Estudillo’s adobe home (n=1). These previously recorded resources and their locations relative to the project area are outlined in Table 1.

KPA-07-895.ARS 24 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Table 1. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Located Within One Mile of the Project Area

Within Within ~One ~0.50 Within Recorder to 0.50 to 0.25 ~0.25 Within Resource Name and Mile Mile Mile Project Number Date Resource Description Radius Radius Radius Area? Historic: San Jacinto Forest Fire Station. This building was constructed in c. 1921 and has been M. Thornton reported as the first State Ranger for the Office for Riverside County. California 33-5776 Department of This resource is listed in the HPDF ⚫ __ __ No Forestry and with a status code of 4CM, Fire Protection indicating that it is on the Master (CDF), 1994 List of State Owned Properties (PRC §5024) and that it appears eligible for the NRHP or the CRHR through other evaluation. Historic: Pioneer Hotel/Virginia Lee Hotel. A Vernacular wood frame J. Warner of hotel that was constructed in 1886. the Riverside

County 33-5789 This resource is listed in the HPDF ⚫ __ __ No Historical with a status code of 3S, indicating Commission that it appears eligible for the NRHP (RCHC), 1982 as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence constructed in 1911.

D. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7298 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence constructed in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7299 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: J&S Refrigeration. A commercial building constructed in S. Stuart of 1910. 33-7300 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No 1982 This resource is listed in the HPDF with a status code of 7N, indicating that it needs to be reevaluated. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame building constructed in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7305 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 25 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

33-7311 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1982 with a status code of 3S, indicating that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A commercial building constructed in 1946.

D. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7312 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Mediterranean/Spanish Revival style residence built in 1928. S. Stuart of 33-7314 the RCHC, This resource is listed in the HPDF ⚫ __ __ No 1982 with a status code of 3S, indicating that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: New Life Chapel. A Mission Revival style building constructed between 1920 and 1953. Initially constructed as a residence, the building was being S. Stuart of used as a small church in 1982. 33-7315 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No

1982 This resource is listed in the HPDF with a status code of 3S, indicating that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1914.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7316 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1917.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7318 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 26 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Within Within ~One ~0.50 Within Recorder to 0.50 to 0.25 ~0.25 Within Resource Name and Mile Mile Mile Project Number Date Resource Description Radius Radius Radius Area? Historic: Bosman’s Sewing Barn. A Commercial Moderne style building constructed in about 1940. Initially used as a dairy, the building was being used as a sewing shop in S. Stuart of 1982. 33-7319 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No

1982 This resource is listed in the HPDF with a status code of 7R, indicating that it was identified in reconnaissance level survey and that it was not evaluated. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1899.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7320 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence with an associated milk- house and shed built in about 1890. M. Van Luven 33-7321 of the RCHC, This resource is listed in the HPDF ⚫ __ __ No 1982 with a status code of 5S2, indicating that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: St. Anthony’s Catholic Church. A Mediterranean/Spanish Revival style church built in about 1920. S. Stuart of

33-7323 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1982 with a status code of 3S, indicating that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1908.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7328 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1880. S. Stuart of

33-7329 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1982 with a status code of 7N, indicating that it needs to be reevaluated.

KPA-07-895.ARS 27 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7330 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1900.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7331 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1890.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7332 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1916.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7333 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1926.

D. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7335 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Victorian mixed style residence built in about 1900.

J. Warner of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7336 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence with stucco built in 1900.

M. Van Luven This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7339 of the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 28 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

M. Van Luven This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7340 of the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 7R, indicating 1982 that it was identified in reconnaissance level survey and that it was not evaluated. Historic: A Vernacular brick residence built in about 1890.

M. Van Luven This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7341 of the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1926.

M. Van Luven This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7342 of the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A barn built in about 1924. S. Stuart of 33-7345 the RCHC, This resource is listed in the HPDF __ __ ⚫ No 1982 with a status code of 7N, indicating that it needs to be reevaluated. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1925.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7346 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1900.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7347 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Mediterranean/Spanish Revival style residence built in 1930. S. Stuart of 33-7348 the RCHC, This resource is listed in the HPDF __ __ ⚫ No 1982 with a status code of 3S, indicating that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 29 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7349 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Craftsman Bungalow style residence built in 1912.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7350 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1916.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7354 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1890.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7355 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Queen Anne style residence built in 1897.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7356 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: Hillview Farm. Three (3) structures built in 1930, including a Bungalow style residence, a barn, and a tank house. J. Warner of

33-7360 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1982 with a status code of 5S2, indicating that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 30 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

J. Warner of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7365 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1900.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7370 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7371 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1926.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7372 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7374 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1910.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7375 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1910.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7376 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 31 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7377 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1885.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7378 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1916.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7379 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7380 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Craftsman Bungalow style residence built in about 1916.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7381 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1913.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7382 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 32 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Within Within ~One ~0.50 Within Recorder to 0.50 to 0.25 ~0.25 Within Resource Name and Mile Mile Mile Project Number Date Resource Description Radius Radius Radius Area? Originally recorded by Historic: This resource is a M. Van Luven Vernacular wood frame residence of the RCHC, built in 1920. It was originally 1982 recorded in 1982 and relocated in 1996 or later, based on the date of Updated by A. the Location Map. 33-7387 ⚫ __ __ No Garrison and T. Barket of This resource is listed in the HPDF Scientific with a status code of 5S2, indicating Resource that it is an individual property Surveys, Inc. eligible for local listing or (SRS), 1996 designation. or later Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1920.

M. Van Luven This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7388 of the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1920.

D. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7389 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1933.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7390 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1915.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7391 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7392 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 33 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7393 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in about 1906.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7395 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Bungalow style residence built in 1920.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7396 the RCHC, __ ⚫ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1932.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7397 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1883.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7398 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 3S, indicating 1982 that it appears eligible for the NRHP as an individual property through survey evaluation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1932.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7400 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in 1936.

S. Stuart of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7401 the RCHC, __ __ ⚫ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1982 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 34 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

33-7403 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1984 with a status code of 7N, indicating that it needs to be reevaluated. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame residence built in about 1910.

M. Starratt of This resource is listed in the HPDF 33-7404 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No with a status code of 5S2, indicating 1984 that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation. Historic: Hotel Vosburg. A Vernacular wood frame hotel constructed in about 1920. M. Starratt of

33-7405 the RCHC, ⚫ __ __ No This resource is listed in the HPDF 1984 with a status code of 7K, indicating that it was resubmitted to OHP for action but it was not reevaluated. Historic: A Vernacular wood frame multi-family residence built in about 1915. M. Starratt of 33-7406 the RCHC, This resource is listed in the HPDF ⚫ __ __ No 1984 with a status code of 5S2, indicating that it is an individual property eligible for local listing or designation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 35 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Within Within ~One ~0.50 Within Recorder to 0.50 to 0.25 ~0.25 Within Resource Name and Mile Mile Mile Project Number Date Resource Description Radius Radius Radius Area? Historic: Estudillo Mansion. This resource is an Italianate style single-family residence once owned by Francisco Estudillo. Estudillo inherited the property and most of the San Jacinto Valley through a Mexican land grant conferred to his family. He later became one (1) of the main developers of the area and served in local government. The NRHP period of significance for this Nomination resource is 1885 to 1901, which Form prepared reflects the time period that Estudillo by E. L. Hewitt maintained his residence at the site. 33-12194 of the City of ⚫ ⚫ __ No San Jacinto This resource was nominated for Community inclusion in the NRHP in 2001 under Development Criterion B (Person). In 2001, the Office, 2001 State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurred and found that the resource met the NRHP criteria at the local level.

This resource is listed in the HPDF with a status code of 1S, indicating that it is an individual property listed in the NRHP by the Keeper. In addition, this resource is listed in the CRHR.

KPA-07-895.ARS 36 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Updated by P. Beedle of AE, 2006; T. Cooley of Jones & Stokes, 2007; A. Craft of Jones & Stokes, 2008; Historic: San Jacinto Valley D. Ballester of Railway. This resource consists of CRM Tech, a railway that travels a semicircular 2008; M.C. route through the San Jacinto 33- Hamilton and Valley. It was constructed in 1888 15743/CA- J. George of and extended from Perris to its ⚫ __ __ No RIV-8196 AE, 2009; S. terminus in San Jacinto. Justus and A. Giacinto of Since originally recorded in 2005, ASM Affiliates, various segments have been 2010; J. surveyed and recorded as updates. Trampier of Statistical Research, Inc. (SRI), 2011; S. Wilson and J. Gibson of AECOM, 2012; C. Cotterman and E. Denniston of ECORP, 2012; D. Ballester of CRM Tech, 2015; and M. Hogan of CRM Tech, 2016.

KPA-07-895.ARS 37 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Within Within ~One ~0.50 Within Recorder to 0.50 to 0.25 ~0.25 Within Resource Name and Mile Mile Mile Project Number Date Resource Description Radius Radius Radius Area? Historic: Kuhn’s Housing Compound. This resource occupies four (4) adjacent parcels and is comprised of 14 residential buildings, a barn/workshop, four (4) ancillary structures, and a former 33- railroad refrigerator boxcar. The J. Smallwood 19840/CA- development associated with this ⚫ __ __ No of AE, 2011 RIV-10093 resource occurred between c. 1948 and the late 1950s.

In 2011, the buildings and the overall compound were recommended not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP or the CRHR. Historic: Francisco Estudillo Adobe Archaeological Site. This site consists of an archaeological deposit situated at the mapped location of Francisco Estudillo’s adobe home that was reportedly destroyed by a fire in 1884. The site dates to c. 1860s to the 1880s.

In 2011, this site was subjected to a 33- J. Smallwood cursory investigation via pedestrian 19841/CA- ⚫ __ __ No of AE, 2011 survey and three (3) hand-augured RIV-10094 probes. The results of the probes indicated that the subsurface contained melted and broken glass, ceramics, charcoal, and burned soils. Thus, the site was described as likely to contain additional extant deposits within the subsurface. However, the horizontal and vertical boundaries of the site were not defined at this time. Historic: James A. Stein Property. This resource consists of the remains of a farm or ranch, including fields used for pastureland, residential building 33- J. McKenna of remains, water control features, and 21063/CA- McKenna, et ⚫ __ __ No a windrow. The property was RIV-10911 al., 2012 initially developed between 1920 and 1938 and a residence and garage were built in c. 1948. The residence was demolished post- 1996. Historic: Woodhead/Quandt Ranch. R. Goodwin of This resource consists of two (2) 33- LSA concrete slabs and a refuse deposit. 24106/CA- Associates, The refuse deposit includes ⚫ __ __ No RIV-11852 Inc. (LSA), farm/ranch debris and modern 2014 refuse. The site dates to 1945 and later.

KPA-07-895.ARS 38 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

The EIC records search also indicated that 35 area-specific technical reports are on file for the project area and the one mile search radius. One (1) of these reports addresses the project area via a Phase I study completed in 2007 (RI-7557/L&L 2007). This study included an intensive pedestrian survey that returned negative results for observable cultural resources.

Collectively, the 35 previous reports address approximately 15 percent of the land located within the entire search radius. The survey coverage varies throughout the search radius with the lands located within 0.25 mile exhibiting 5 percent coverage, between 0.25 and 0.50 mile 10 percent coverage, and 0.50 and one mile of the project area exhibiting about 25 percent coverage. The details of these reports are summarized below in Table 2.

Table 2. Previous Cultural Resources Studies Within One Mile of the Project Area

Report # Date Rsrcs Report Author

Archaeological Impact Report: Eastern Municipal Water District, Archaeological RI-0186 1975 Yes Riverside County, California: PL 984 Water Systems Addition Research Unit (ARU)

An Archaeological Assessment of the Manzanita Garden RI-1725 1983 No ARU Apartments, San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of Tentative Tract 33716, RI-5078 2005 No AE San Jacinto, California

Phase II Archaeological Study for San Jacinto Museum RI-5147 2004 Yes Discovery Works, Inc. Building’s Foundation

Letter Report: Archaeological Monitoring of the Museum RI-5183 2004 Yes Discovery Works, Inc. Building Site Located at 150 Dillon Street, San Jacinto

Results of the Artifact Documentation and Geotechnical Trench RI-5517 2005 Yes Excavation Monitoring at APN 431-160-012, in the City of San LSA Jacinto, Riverside County, California

Letter Report: Proposed Cellular Tower Project in Riverside RI-5671 2004 No Earth Touch, Inc. County, California, Site Name/Number: CA-7608/Domenigoni

Letter Report: Records Search and Field Reconnaissance Results for the Mountain Union Telecom San Jacinto/Lyon RI-5760 2004 No C.A.R.E. Wireless Site (PO/REF#: SFC #4006), Located at 120 South Lyon Avenue, City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California

Phase I Cultural Resources Study for the North San Jacinto RI-5772 2004 Yes Jones & Stokes Sewer Project, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: San Jacinto RI-6479 2005 Yes Town Center Project, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CRM Tech California

Cultural Resource Assessment: 39-Acre Stein Project (APN RI-6742 2005 No LSA 431-090-009-8), City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 39 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Report # Date Rsrcs Report Author

Letter Report: DWO 6577-5304; JI# 5-5326; Bissel 12 kV, Flood Compass Rose RI-6768 2006 No Control Channel Bore, San Jacinto Area, Riverside County, Archaeological, Inc. California

Archaeological Report of Phase I Archaeological Assessment of Parkside Resource RI-6770 2006 No Project, Parcel Map 34515, City of San Jacinto, Riverside Management County, California Corporation (ARMC)

Archaeological Site Visit and Background Study for the Coventry RI-6883 2006 No Acres Development Project, San Jacinto, Riverside County, SWCA California

Cultural Resources Survey for the Ramona Expressway RI-6885 2005 Yes Widening Project: State Street to Lake Park Drive, San Jacinto, SWCA Riverside County, California

Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: Assessor's RI-7531 2007 Yes Parcel No. 434-200-006, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CRM Tech California

Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Report: Crossroads at Richard Shepard RI-7533 2007 No San Jacinto Commercial Development, City of San Jacinto, Consulting Services Riverside County, California

A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for the San Jacinto RI-7557 2007 No Retail Park, APN 434-050-014, a 1.7 Acre Property, in the City of L&L San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

An Archaeological Assessment of the Bella Vista Plaza Project, Brian F. Smith and RI-7639 2006 No APN 434-070-007 Associates (BFSA)

Report of Archaeological Monitoring of Parkside Project, Parcel RI-7825 2007 No ARMC Map 34515, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

Phase I Archaeological Records Search and Field Survey on a 1.86-Acre Property, APN: 434-353-023 (Parcel #105), Located RI-7860 2008 No SRS on Idyllwild Drive, in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

A Phase Archaeological Assessment for the 218, LLC Project, RI-7898 2007 No City of San Jacinto, California, APNs 434-020-022, 434-020-023, BFSA and 434-020-024

Letter Report: Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Michael Brandman RI-8143 2008 No Results for Royal Street Communications California, LLC Associates (MBA) Candidate

Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: San Jacinto RI-8160 2008 No Master Drainage Plan in and near the City of San Jacinto CRM Tech Riverside County, California

Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: EMWD RI-8350 2009 No Citrus In-Lieu Northern Alignment Reach 1, City of San Jacinto, CRM Tech Riverside County, California

Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for T- RI-8651 2011 No MBA Mobile USA Candidate IE25955-C

Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: Assessor's RI-8687 2011 No CRM Tech Parcel No. 434-070-033

KPA-07-895.ARS 40 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Report # Date Rsrcs Report Author

An Archaeological Survey Report for SCE Co.'s Archaeological RI-8814 2012 No RSO Consulting Survey for the SCE Co. GRM Project

A Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation for the Proposed San RI-8831 2012 No McKenna, et al. Jacinto Unified School District Elementary/Middle School Site

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment For The Fountainhead RI-8963 2013 No Delta, LP, Family Dollar Project, in The City Of San Jacinto, AE Riverside County, California

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey and Evaluation Report for RI-9098 2011 Yes the Kuhns Drive Redevelopment Project, City of San Jacinto, AE Riverside County, California

Cultural Resources Monitoring Program Ramona Expressway RI-9326 2015 Yes Widening Phase II, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, LSA California

Cultural Resources Assessment Ramona Expressway Widening RI-9587 2011 No Project Sanderson Avenue to Main Street, City of San Jacinto, LSA Riverside County, California

Letter Report: Re: Cultural Resource Constraints Analysis for RI-10173 2016 Yes 1.62 Acres on Greco Court, City of San Jacinto, Riverside AE County, California

Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment for the 777 Cottonwood RI-10239 2017 No AE Avenue Project, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California

4.2) Historic Records Review

Historic documents and maps available from the BLM GLO website were reviewed to provide information about historic era land use and development within the project area (BLM 2018). In addition, archival topographic maps and aerial photographs containing the project area were reviewed. This review included topographic maps dating between 1952 and 2015 and aerial photographs dating between 1966 and 2014 (NETR 2018).

A review of land patents for Section 27 of Township 4 South, Range 1 West indicated that the entirety of Section 27 was transferred to Resaria Estudillo de Aguirra, Jose Antonio Estudillo, Concepcion Estudillo, Francisco Estudillo, Guadalupe Estudillo, Jose Antonio Estudillo, and Jose Maria Estudillo on January 17, 1880. This transfer occurred under the authority of the Spanish-Mexican Grant of March 3, 1851 (9 Stat. 631) and consisted of approximately 35,000 acres. This land grant was known as the San Jacinto Viejo. No additional transfers are listed for any portion of Section 27.

Topographic maps dating between 1952 and 1973 depict neither structures nor any other development in the project area. Cottonwood Avenue is shown as an unnamed road in or near

KPA-07-895.ARS 41 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 its current alignment to the south of the project area as early as 1952 and State Street is shown in its current alignment to the east of the project area by 1973. In 1980, three (3) structures are shown within the project area boundaries. This development pattern is consistent between 1980 and the most recent topographic map depicting individual structures (1999). Topographic maps dating to 2012 and 2015 do not include this level of detail; however, they show Cottonwood Avenue and State Street in their current locations.

The earliest available aerial photograph dates to 1966 and shows neither structures nor any other development in the project area. Cottonwood Avenue is shown in its current location to the south of the project area and State Street is shown to the east of the project area. In 1978, several structures are shown in the project area, including various rectangular features that may represent storage containers or trailers. At this time, the cinder-block wall and mobile home park that form the western project area boundary are depicted for the first time. The development located in the project area and in the nearby mobile home park occurred between 1972 and 1978. By 1996, all of the structures once depicted in the project area appear to have been removed and the project area is vacant with the exception of a cement slab or rectangular foundation remnant. Thereafter, an informal driveway or vehicle turnout appears on the southern edge of the project in 2005. This development pattern is consistent between 2005 and most recent aerial photograph (see Figure 3).

4.3) Native American Coordination

An SLS was requested from the NAHC on July 25, 2018 and August 3, 2018 and a response was received on August 6, 2018 (Appendix D). The NAHC SLS failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. However, the NAHC noted that the absence of specific site information does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area and that other resources should be consulted to obtain information regarding known and previously recorded sites.

A total of 34 scoping letters were sent to the Tribes and individuals named by the NAHC on August 10 and 13, 2018. On August 14, 2018, three (3) additional scoping letters were sent to updated contacts provided by the Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe. As a result of the information scoping process, no specific information has been obtained about the presence of Native American resources in or near the project area. All correspondence has been incorporated into Appendix E and a summary of the detail is provided below in Table 3.

KPA-07-895.ARS 42 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Table 3. Summary of Native American Coordination

Contact Method of Name and Contact Contact and Action(s) Title Affiliation Date Response Required?

Scoping letter sent Doug Welmas, Cabazon Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson Mission Indians 13, 2018

In a letter dated August 13, 2018, Ms. Stapp indicated that the proposed project is located outside of the Tribe’s current reservation Response letter Judy Stapp, boundaries, but within an area that may be Advise the Lead Cabazon Band of received via U.S. Director of considered a TUA. In addition, the Tribe has Agency of the Mission Indians Mail and dated Cultural Affairs no specific archival information to indicate Tribe’s comments. August 13, 2018 that the project area may be a sacred/religious site or other site of Native American traditional cultural value. Los Coyotes Band Shane Scoping letter sent of Cahuilla and Chapparosa, via Email on August No response received. N/A Cupeno Mission Chairman 13, 2018 Indians Shasta Gaughen, Scoping letter sent Pala Band of Tribal Historic via Email on August No response received. N/A Mission Indians Preservation 13, 2018 Officer (THPO)

Scoping letter sent Pauma Band of Temet Aguilar via Email on August No response received. N/A Luiseno Indians 13, 2018

Joseph Scoping letter sent Ramona Band of Hamilton, via Email on August No response received. N/A Cahuilla Indians Chairman 13, 2018

Twenty-Nine Scoping letter sent Darrell Mike, Palms Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson Mission Indians 13, 2018

Charles F. Scoping letter sent Chemehuevi Indian Wood, via Email on August No response received. N/A Tribe Chairperson 13, 2018

Timothy Scoping letter sent Fort Mojave Indian Williams, via U.S. Mail on No response received. N/A Tribe Chairperson August 10, 2018

Juaneno Band of Matias Scoping letter sent Mission Indians – Belardes, via Email on August No response received. N/A Acjachemen Chairperson 13, 2018 Nation Colorado River Scoping letter sent Dennis Patch, Indian Tribes of the via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairman Colorado River 13, 2018 Indian Reservation On August 14, 2018, a response email was Send scoping Michael Quechan Tribe of Scoping letter sent received from Quechan THPO H. Jill letters to the Jackson, Sr., the Fort Yuma via Email on August McCormick. This email included three (3) updated Quechan President Indian Reservation 13, 2018 updated names as points of contact for the Tribal contacts Tribe. (see below).

Keeny Quechan Tribe of Scoping letter sent Escalanti, Sr., the Fort Yuma via Email on August No response received. N/A President Indian Reservation 13 and 14, 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 43 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Contact Method of Name and Contact Contact and Action(s) Title Affiliation Date Response Required?

Quechan Tribe of Scoping letter sent Virgil Smith, the Fort Yuma via Email on August No response received. N/A Vice President Indian Reservation 14, 2018

H. Jill Quechan Tribe of Scoping letter sent McCormick, the Fort Yuma via Email on August No response received. N/A THPO Indian Reservation 14, 2018

Anthony Gabrieleno/Tongva Scoping letter sent Morales, San Gabriel Band via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson of Mission Indians 13, 2018

Steven Scoping letter sent Santa Rosa Band Estrada, via Email on August No response received. N/A of Cahuilla Indians Chairman 13, 2018

Amanda Scoping letter sent Augustine Band of Vance, via Email on August No response received. N/A Cahuilla Indians Chairperson 13, 2018

Sandonne Scoping letter sent Gabrielino/Tongva Goad, via Email on August No response received. N/A Nation Chairperson 13, 2018

Juaneno Band of Teresa Scoping letter sent Mission Indians – Romero, via Email on August No response received. N/A Acjachemen Chairwoman 13, 2018 Nation Lee Clauss, Scoping letter sent Jessica Mauck responded on behalf of Lee Director – CRM SMBMI via Email on August Clauss via email on August 13, 2018 (see N/A Department 13, 2018 below).

Ms. Mauck indicated that the proposed project area is located outside of Serrano Jessica Mauck, Response received ancestral territory. As such, the SMBMI Advise the Lead Cultural SMBMI via Email on August stated that they will not request consulting Agency of the Resources 13, 2018 party status or elect to participate in the Tribe’s comments. Analyst scoping, development, and/or review of documents for the project.

Scoping letter sent Bo Mazzetti, Rincon Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson Luiseno Indians 13, 2018

Scoping letter sent San Luis Rey Band Tribal Council via Email on August No response received. N/A of Mission Indians 13, 2018

Scoping letter sent Jeff Grubbe, ACBCI via U.S. Mail on No response received. N/A Chairperson August 10, 2018

Scoping letter sent Robert Martin, Morongo Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson Mission Indians 13, 2018

Scoping letter sent Mark Macarro, Pechanga Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairman Luiseno Indians 13, 2018

Thomas Scoping letter sent La Jolla Band of Rodriguez, via U.S. Mail on No response received. N/A Luiseno Indians Chairperson August 10, 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 44 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Contact Method of Name and Contact Contact and Action(s) Title Affiliation Date Response Required?

Scoping letter sent Goldie Walker, Serrano Nation of via U.S. Mail on No response received. N/A Chairperson Mission Indians August 10, 2018

Patricia Garcia- Scoping letter sent Plotkin, ACBCI via Email on August No response received. N/A Director/THPO 13, 2018

Ms. Padilla stated that the proposed project is Lacy Padilla, Response letter located within the Tribe’s TUA. Further, the Advise the Lead Archaeological ACBCI received via Email Tribe deferred to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Agency of the Technician on August 24, 2018 Indians and concluded their consultation Tribe’s comments. efforts for the project. Sonia Scoping letter sent Johnston, Juaneno Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A Tribal Mission Indians 13, 2018 Chairperson

Daniel Scoping letter sent Cahuilla Band of Salgado, via Email on August No response received. N/A Indians Chairperson 13, 2018

Juaneno Band of Scoping letter sent Joyce Perry, Mission Indians – via Email on August No response received. N/A Tribal Manager Acjachemen 13, 2018 Nation Joseph Ontiveros, Scoping letter sent Soboba Band of Cultural via Email on August No response received. N/A Luiseno Indians Resource 13, 2018 Department

Gabrieleno Band of Scoping letter sent Andrew Salas, Mission Indians – via Email on August No response received. N/A Chairperson Kizh Nation 13, 2018

Anthony Twenty-Nine Scoping letter sent Madrigal, Jr., Palms Band of via Email on August No response received. N/A THPO Mission Indians 13, 2018

Advise the Lead Ms. Bliss indicated that the Tribe’s Historic Agency of the Sarah Bliss, Preservation Office was not aware of any Tribe’s comments Twenty-Nine Response received Cultural cultural resources or any TCRs within the and notify the Palms Band of via Email on August Resources project area. Further, she requested Tribe if the Mission Indians 20, 2018 Manager notification in the event that there were any proposed project is updates or changes to the project. updated or modified.

Robert H. Scoping letter sent Pala Band of Smith, via Email on August No response received. N/A Mission Indians Chairperson 13, 2018

Michael Mirelez, Torres-Martinez Scoping letter sent Cultural Desert Cahuilla via Email on August No response received. N/A Resource Indians 13, 2018 Coordinator

Scoping letter sent Lynn Valbuena SMBMI via U.S. Mail on No response received. N/A August 10, 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 45 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

4.4) Pedestrian Survey

L&L Archaeologist Shannon M. Smith, B.S. performed the pedestrian survey on August 6 and 21, 2018 and L&L Archaeologist William R. Gillean, B.S. completed additional survey efforts on September 4, 2018. East-west trending transects were completed at intervals of no more than 10 meters throughout the entirety of the ±2.2 acre project area. Survey coverage is shown in relation to the project area boundary in Figure 5 and photographs of the project area are included in Appendix C.

The project area is an irregular shaped property that is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of State Street and Cottonwood Avenue. The project area is bounded by State Street to the east (Appendix C: Photograph 1) and Cottonwood Avenue to the south (Appendix C: Photograph 2). The western boundary consists of a cinder-block wall and an established mobile home park (Appendix C: Photograph 3) and the northern boundary is comprised of a plowed vacant field (Appendix C: Photograph 4).

Surface visibility is good to excellent throughout the entire project area, depending on the presence or absence of vegetation (70 to 100 percent; Appendix C: Photograph 5). Portions of the project area containing low-lying brome grasses exhibited good surface visibility at about 70 to 80 percent (Appendix C: Photographs 6 and 7), while areas lacking vegetation had excellent visibility at 100 percent (Appendix C: Photographs 3, 4, and 5). The soils have been subjected to recent excavation in two (2) areas, resulting in two (2) shallow excavation pits (Appendix C: Photograph 8). In each of these soil pits, a single, drilled borehole was observed (Appendix C: Photograph 9).

During the pedestrian survey, no prehistoric resources were detected and one (1) historic age archaeological site was encountered and recorded (San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]). This resource is described in Section 4.5 below.

KPA-07-895.ARS 46 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Project Area (2.2 acres) Survey Area (2.2 acres)

L&L Environmental, Inc. Figure 5 Survey Coverage in BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING the Project Area (Photo obtained from Google Earth, February 2018) KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 47 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

4.5) Resources Located in the Project Area

One (1) previously unrecorded archaeological site was detected in the southern portion of the project area (SJRC-1). This resource is described in detail below and is shown in relation to the project area boundary in Figure 6. According to an archival aerial photograph review, this resource appears to have been constructed between 1972 and 1978 (NETR 2018). This indicates that Site SJRC-1 ranges between 40 and 46 years in age and may be historic age for the purposes of CEQA (45 years in age or older when considering an approximate five [5] year planning horizon for the proposed project).

4.5.1) 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1])

33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site SJRC-1) is a potential historic age resource comprised of a concrete slab or foundation remnant (Feature 1). Feature 1 is oriented northeast-southwest and it measures 56 feet in length by 10 feet in width (Appendix C: Photograph 10). The foundation remnant was detected in an area that corresponds to the location of a structure that was built between 1972 and 1978. The structure was subsequently removed between 1978 and 1996 (NETR 2018). The site is currently in poor condition and appears to have been adversely impacted by heavy equipment and weed abatement activities.

A DPR 523 Form was prepared for this resource and was submitted to the EIC for the assignment of a Primary Number/Trinomial. The DPR 523 Form has been incorporated into Appendix F.

KPA-07-895.ARS 48 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Figure 6 L&L Environmental, Inc. Cultural Resources BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING in the Project Area (Photo obtained from Google Earth, February 2018)

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 49 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

4.6) Eligibility Recommendations and Project Impacts

4.6.1) 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1])

33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site SJRC-1) was detected and recorded by L&L in 2018. Site SJRC- 1 is currently in poor condition and appears to have been adversely impacted by heavy equipment as the structure once associated with this resource has been demolished. To be considered eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, a resource must possess integrity and demonstrate eligibility under at least one (1) of the CRHR criteria. This site does not appear to retain sufficient integrity to be considered eligible for inclusion in the CRHR and no evidence was detected to indicate that this resource has the potential to yield additional information important to history in the future. Therefore, L&L recommends this site as not eligible for inclusion in the CRHR and not significant pursuant to CEQA.

33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site SJRC-1) is located within a portion of the project area proposed for commercial development, including a new building (Building B) and associated parking (Figure 7). Therefore, this resource will be directly impacted by the proposed project. Recordation onto a DPR 523 Form exhausts the site’s research value and no further work is recommended for this resource prior to project implementation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 50 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Figure 7 L&L Environmental, Inc. Cultural Resources BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INVESTIGATIONS AND MONITORING and Project Impacts (Photo obtained from Google Earth, February 2018)

KPA-07-895 TPM No. 35511, City of San Jacinto October 2018 County of Riverside, California

KPA-07-895.ARS 51 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

5.0) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

In accordance with CEQA, L&L has assessed the impacts of the proposed development on the project area. A records search at the EIC indicated that no cultural resources have been recorded within the project area and that the project area was previously surveyed in 2007 with negative findings (RI-7557/L&L 2007). In addition, the records search showed that the lands within one mile of the project area have been addressed by 35 cultural resources reports. These studies have addressed approximately 15 percent of the land within the search radius and have recorded a total of 74 cultural resources.

A historic records review included the examination of documents and maps available from the BLM GLO (BLM 2018), archival topographic maps (NETR 2018), and aerial photographs (NETR 2018). The results of the review indicated that the project area was once part of the San Jacinto Viejo land grant (BLM 2018). In addition, several structures and possible storage containers or trailers were constructed in the project area between 1972 and 1978. All of these structures and features were removed by 1996. Since this time, the project area has remained vacant, with the exception of a single concrete slab or foundation remnant and an informal driveway or vehicle turnout along the southern edge of the project.

An SLS was completed by the NAHC and the search failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area (Appendix D). Information scoping letters were sent to the 34 contacts listed by the NAHC on August 10 and 13, 2018. On August 14, 2018, three (3) additional scoping letters were sent to updated contacts from the Fort Yuma Quechan Tribe. As of the date of this report, four (4) responses have been received from the SMBMI, the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians, and the ACBCI. The SMBMI indicated that the proposed project area is located outside of Serrano ancestral territory and that they will not request consulting party status or elect to participate in the scoping, development, and/or review of documents for the project. The Cabazon Band stated that the project is located in an area that may be considered a TUA and that they had no specific information to indicate that project area may be a sacred/religious site or other site of Native American traditional cultural value. The Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians indicated that their Tribal Historic Preservation Office was not aware of any cultural resources or any TCRs within the project area. Finally, the ACBCI stated that the project area is located within the Tribe’s TUA and that they deferred to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians for the project. All correspondence completed to date has been incorporated into Appendix E.

KPA-07-895.ARS 52 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

A pedestrian survey was conducted for the project area on August 6, 2018; August 21, 2018; and September 4, 2018. During the pedestrian survey, no prehistoric resources were detected and one (1) historic age archaeological site was encountered and recorded (San Jacinto Retail Center-1 [SJRC-1]). Site SJRC-1 consists of one (1) concrete slab/foundation remnant. The foundation remains were detected in an area that corresponds to the location of a structure that was constructed between 1972 and 1978 and removed between 1978 and 1996 (NETR 2018). This indicates that Site SJRC-1 ranges between 40 and 46 years in age and may be historic age for the purposes of CEQA. Site SJRC-1 was recorded onto a DPR 523 Form that was submitted to the EIC (Appendix F).

To be considered eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, a resource must possess integrity and demonstrate eligibility under at least one (1) of the CRHR criteria. 33-28508/CA-RIV-12844 (Site SJRC-1) is currently in poor condition and has been adversely impacted by heavy equipment and weed abatement activities. As such, this site does not retain sufficient integrity to be considered eligible for inclusion in the CRHR. Therefore, L&L recommends this site as not eligible for inclusion in the CRHR and not significant pursuant to CEQA. This resource is located within the development footprint and it will be directly impacted by the proposed project. Recordation onto a DPR 523 Form exhausts the site’s research value and no further work is recommended for this resource prior to project implementation.

KPA-07-895.ARS 53 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 significance. See Section 5.2 below.

5.1) Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains

There is always the possibility that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown buried human remains. If human remains are discovered during any phase of construction, including disarticulated or cremated remains, all ground-disturbing activities should cease within 100 feet of the remains and the County Coroner and the Lead Agency (City of San Jacinto) should be immediately notified.

California State Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition pursuant to CEQA regulations and PRC Section 5097.98. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the NAHC shall be notified within 24 hours and the guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains. The Lead Agency shall also retain a professional archaeologist with Native American burial experience to conduct a field investigation of the find and consult with the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), if any, identified by the NAHC. As necessary and appropriate, the archaeologist may provide professional assistance to the MLD, including the excavation and removal of the human remains. The Lead Agency shall be responsible for approval of recommended mitigation as it deems appropriate, taking account of the provisions of State law, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) and PRC Section 5097.98. The project contractor shall implement approved mitigation measure(s), to be verified by the Lead Agency, prior to resuming ground-disturbing activities within 100 feet of where the remains were discovered.

5.2) Unanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources

It is always possible that ground-disturbing activities may uncover presently obscured or buried and previously unknown cultural resources. In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, such resources could be damaged or destroyed, resulting in impacts to potentially significant cultural resources. If subsurface cultural resources are encountered during construction, if evidence of an archaeological site are observed, or if other suspected historic resources are encountered, it is recommended that all ground-disturbing activity cease within 100 feet of the resource. A professional archaeologist shall be consulted to assess the find and to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified archeological personnel shall assist the Lead Agency by generating measures to protect the discovered resources. Potentially significant cultural resources could consist of, but are not

KPA-07-895.ARS 54 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018 limited to: stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including structural remains, historic dumpsites, hearths, and middens. Midden features are characterized by darkened soil and could conceal material remains, including worked stone, fired clay vessels, faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials and special attention should always be paid to uncharacteristic soil color changes. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction should be recorded on appropriate DPR Forms and evaluated for significance under all applicable regulatory criteria.

If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.

KPA-07-895.ARS 55 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

6.0) REFERENCES CITED

Bean, L. J. 1972. Mukat’s People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Bean, L. J. 1978. Cahuilla. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 575-587. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

Bean, L. J., and H. Lawton. 1975. The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. Banning, CA: Maliki Museum Press.

Bean, L. J., and K. S. Saubel. 1979. Temalpakh: Cahuilla Indian Knowledge and Usage of Plants. Banning, CA: Maliki Museum Press.

Bean, L. J. and F. C. Shipek. 1978. Luiseño. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 550-563. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

Bean, W. and J. J. Rawls. 1983. California: An Interpretive History, 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 2018. General Land Office Records Search for Section 27 of Township 4 South, Range 1 West. Website accessed August 2018. https://glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx

California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). 1990. Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1054/files/armr.pdf

Chartkoff, J. L. and K. K. Chartkoff. 1984. The Archaeology of California. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford University Press.

CRM Tech. 2005. Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: San Jacinto Town Center Project, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. RI-6479. On file at the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside.

Dibblee, T. W. and J. A. Minch. 2003. Geologic Map of the San Jacinto Quadrangle, Riverside County, California. U. S. Geological Survey.

Fagan, B. M. 2003. Before California: An Archaeologist Looks at Our Earliest Inhabitants. New York, NY: Alta Mira Press.

Hardesty, D. and B. Little. 2000. Assessing Site Significance: A Guide for Archaeologists and Historians. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.

Heizer, R. F. (ed). 1978. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

Jones, T. L. and K. A. Klar (eds). 2007. California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture and Complexity. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.

KPA-07-895.ARS 56 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of Ethnology Bulletin No. 78. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

Kroeber, A. L. and L. Hooper. 1978. Studies in Cahuilla Culture Classics in California Anthropology No. 4. Banning, CA: Malki Museum Press.

L&L Environmental, Inc. (L&L). 2007. A Phase I Archaeological Survey Report for the San Jacinto Retail Park, APN 434-050-014, a 1.7 Acre Property, in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. RI-7557. On file at the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside.

L&L Environmental, Inc. (L&L). 2018. Draft – A Phase I Paleontological Resources Inventory for APN 434-050-032, Tentative Parcel Map 35511, San Jacinto, California.

Lech, S. 2004. Along the Old Roads: A History of the Portion of Southern California that became Riverside County, 1772-1893. Riverside, CA: Self-published.

Moratto, M. J. 1984. California Archaeology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

National Park Service (NPS). 1991. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15. Washington, DC: National Park Service.

Nationwide Environmental Title Research (NETR). 2018. Historic Aerials and Topographic Maps. Website accessed August 2018. http://www.historicaerials.com

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2018. Web Soil Survey Search. Website accessed September 2018. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

Perris, City of. 2005. City of Perris General Plan 2030. Website accessed September 2018. http://www.cityofperris.org/city-hall/general-plan.html

San Jacinto, City of. 2012 (Updated). City of San Jacinto General Plan. Adopted May 4, 2006 and Amended October 19, 2012. Website accessed September 2018. http://www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us/city-govt/general-plan.html

San Jacinto, City of. 2018a. Demographics. Website accessed September 2018. http://www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us/explore/demographics.html

San Jacinto, City of. 2018b. History. Website accessed September 2018. http://www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us/explore/history.html

Strong, W. D. 1972. Aboriginal Society in Southern California. Banning, CA: Malki Museum.

Wallace, W. J. 1955. A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 11(3): 214-230.

Wallace, W. J. 1978. Post-Pleistocene Archeology, 9000 to 2000 B.C. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8: California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 25-36. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

KPA-07-895.ARS 57 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Warren, C. N. 1968. Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast in Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin- Williams, pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology No. 1.

Wilke, P. J. 1978. Late Prehistoric Human Ecology at Lake Cahuilla, Coachella Valley, California. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research, Facility 38. University of California, Berkeley.

KPA-07-895.ARS 58 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

7.0) CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DATE: October 5, 2018 SIGNED:

PRINTED NAME: Leslie Nay Irish, CEO, L&L Environmental, Inc.

DATE: October 5, 2018 SIGNED:

PRINTED NAME: Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA, L&L Archaeologist

KPA-07-895.ARS 59 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Personnel Qualifications ...... 61 Appendix B: EIC Records Search Forms ...... 70 Appendix C: Photographs ...... 73 Appendix D: Sacred Lands Search ...... 76 Appendix E: Native American Coordination ...... 83 Appendix F: DPR 523 Form ...... 96

KPA-07-895.ARS 60 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX A

Personnel Qualifications

KPA-07-895.ARS 61 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Leslie Nay Irish Principal Project Manager Cal Trans (CT) 022889

Leslie Irish is the qualifying principal for WBE certification with CALTRANS, with both a State and Federal designation as a 100% WBE and Small Business Enterprise. Ms. Irish has multi- disciplinary experience in environmental, engineering, land development and construction management and administration.

Ms. Irish has more than 25 years of experience as a project manager on public and private NEPA / CEQA projects overseeing the areas of biology, archaeology, paleontology, regulatory services and state and federal level permit processing.

Ms. Irish is a certified to perform wetland / jurisdictional delineations and holds a responsible party permit for performing archaeological and paleontological investigations on (BLM) public lands. She has attended the desert tortoise handling class, passed the practicum and the test and was awarded a certificate. She remains an active participant in the oversight of mitigation monitoring and reporting programs, the installation and monitoring of revegetation programs and the development of project impact mitigation plans. Her principal office duties include a review of all environmental documents authored by the firm; oversight of regulatory permits, agency consultation and negotiations; impact mitigation review; and long-term permit compliance. Her field duties are more limited but include delineations / compliance monitoring and reporting (coordination), constraints analysis, plan for corrective measures and resolution of “problem projects”.

Ms. Irish’s responsibilities include direct contact with clients/project proponents, scientists and agencies and involve her in all aspects of the project from a request for proposal to project completion. Ms. Irish has a complex understanding of the industry from various perspectives. As a result, she uses her personal understanding of team member positions and responsibilities in her role as the principal management and quality control lead.

CREDENTIALS AND PERMITS • ACOE, Wetlands Delineation Certification Update, 2015 • ACOE, Advanced Wetlands Delineation and Management, 2001 • ACOE, Wetlands Delineation and Management, 1999, Certificate No. 1257 • U.S. Government, Permit for Archaeology & Paleontology on Federal Lands, Responsible Party • MOU, County of Riverside, Archaeology, Biology, Paleontology and Wetlands ID/Delineation • CALTRANS WBE Certification • Public Utilities Commission, WBE Certified • WBENC, WBE Certified

EDUCATION Certificate in Project Management, Initiating and Planning Projects, UC, Irvine, June 20, 2015 Foundations of Business Strategy, Darden School of Business, UVA, Jan 2014 Design Thinking for Business Innovation (audit), Darden School of Business, UVA, Nov 2013 Update, Storm Water Management BMPs, University of California, Riverside Extension, 2005 Certificate, Wetland Delineation & Management, ACOE, 2000 and Advanced Certificate: 2002 Certificate Program, Field Natural Environment, University of California, Riverside, 1993

KPA-07-895.ARS 62 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Leslie Nay Irish Continued

Certificate Program, Light Construction, Developmental Management, University of California, Riverside, 1987 Certificate Program, Construction Technologies, Administrative Management, Riverside City College, 1987 License B-General and C-Specialties (Concrete/Masonry) and General Law sections, 1986 Core Teaching and Administrative Management, Primary (K-3) and Early Childhood, Cal State, San Bernardino, Lifelong Learning Program, 1973-2005 Behavioral Sciences and Anthropology, Chaffey and Valley Jr./Community Colleges, 1973 – 1976

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY L&L Environmental, Inc. - Principal, Project Manager / Principal in Charge: 1993 - present: Site assessments, surveys, jurisdictional delineations, permit processing, agency consultation/negotiation, impact mitigation, project management, coordination, report writing, technical editing, and quality control. Marketing Consultant - Principal: 1990 - 1993: Engineering / architectural, environmental, and water resource management consultant. Warmington Homes - Jr. Project Manager: 1989 - 1990: Residential development, Riverside and Los Angeles Counties. The Buie Corporation - Processor / Coordinator: 1987 - 1990: The Corona Ranch, Master Planned Community. Psomas & Associates - Processor / Coordinator- 1986 - 1987: Multiple civil engineering and land surveying projects. Irish Construction Company – Builder Partner: (concurrently with above) 1979 - 1990: General construction, residential building (spec. housing), and concrete and masonry product construction.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Member, Building Industry Association Member, Southern California Botanists Member, Archaeological Institute of America Member, Society for California Archaeology Member, California Chamber of Commerce Member, CalFlora Member, San Bernardino County Museum Associates Member, Orange County Natural History Museum Associates Life Member, Society of Wetland Scientists 1994-97 President, Business Development Association, Inland Empire 1993-94 Executive Vice President, Building Industry Association, Riverside County 2010 Chair of the Old House Interest Group – Redlands Area Historical Society

SYMPOSIA, SEMINARS, AND WORKSHOPS Assembly Bill 52 Tribal Consultation Process Overview. Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Group. Temecula, CA. October 2015 ACOE Compensatory Mitigation Workshop – Wilshire Blvd Office, July 16, 2015 May 27, 2015, CWA Rule, Update, San Diego CA, October 20-23, 2015

KPA-07-895.ARS 63 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Leslie Nay Irish Continued

ACOE 2 Day Workshop, Mitigation Rule & Mitigation Checklist, Carlsbad, March 20, 2015 Desert Tortoise Handling Class, update (DT Consortium / Joint Agencies USFWS/CDFG) 2013 Update Bedrock Food Processing Centers in Riverside County, TLMA, 2009 Nexus Geology-Archaeology, Riverside County, TLMA, 2009 Desert Tortoise Handling Class, (DT Consortium / Joint Agencies USFWS/CDFG), 2008 Certificate Granted Ecological Islands and Processes (vernal pools, alkali wetlands, etc.), Southern California Botanists, 2004 Low Impact Development, State Water Board Academy, 2004 Inland Empire Transportation Symposium, 2004 Western Riverside County MSHCP Review and Implementation Seminar, 2004 Field Botany and Taxonomy, Riverside City College, 2002 Construction Storm Water Compliance Workshop, BIA, 2002 Identifying Human Bone: Conducted by L&L Environmental, County Coroner and Page Museum, 2002 CEQA/NEPA Issues in Historic Preservation, UCLA, 2000 CEQA and Biological Resources, University of California, Riverside, 2000 CEQA Law Update 2000, UCLA Land Use Law/Planning Conference, University of California, Riverside CALNAT “95”, University of California, Riverside Desert Fauna, University of California, Riverside Habitat Restoration/Ecology, University of California, Riverside Geology of Yosemite and Death Valley, University of California, Riverside San Andreas Fault: San Bernardino to Palmdale, University of California, Riverside Historic Designations and CEQA Law, UCLA

KPA-07-895.ARS 64 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA Principal Investigator Archaeologist

Ms. Sanka has gained nearly 20 years of archaeological fieldwork and project-related experience in the U.S., including projects in Alaska, Arizona, California, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, and North Carolina. She has conducted all aspects of archaeological fieldwork; has authored and provided third party assessments of numerous cultural resources sections for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental impact reports (EIR), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental impact statements (EIS), NEPA environmental assessments (EA), constraints analyses and CEQA initial studies; and has certified more than 100 CEQA and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)-compliant documents. She is a Registered Professional Archaeologist ([RPA] #15927, 2006), meets the Secretary of Interior (SOI) Standards for Archaeology and has served as a Principal Investigator on projects reviewed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Ms. Sanka has spent over a decade working in the archaeological field in southern California. She is a Riverside County Certified Archaeologist (#103, 2007), a Certified San Diego County CEQA Consultant for Archaeological Resources (2010), and a Certified Orange County Archaeologist (2017). She is also qualified as a Principal Investigator for the BLM Cultural Resources Use Permit (CRUP) for the State of California and the State of Nevada (Historic Resources).

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 2014-present – Archaeologist, L&L Environmental, Inc. Redlands, CA. Perform field survey and site recordation for projects in southern California. Author, certify, and serve as the Principal Investigator for projects in southern California. 2014 – Cultural Resources Specialist, Burns & McDonnell. Kansas City, MO. Perform field survey and site recordation for projects in Carroll, Howard, Miami, and White Counties, IN. 2009-2014 – Associate Project Manager/Archaeologist, Atkins. San Bernardino, CA. Performed field surveys and subsurface testing programs throughout California and Alaska. Authored and certified numerous survey and testing program reports. Served as an Associate Project Manager, Principal Investigator, and Regional Cultural Lead for projects throughout California and Alaska. 2006-2009 – Project Manager/Archaeologist, Michael Brandman Associates (currently First Carbon Solutions). Irvine, CA. Performed field surveys, subsurface testing programs, and data recovery projects throughout southern California. Authored and certified numerous survey and testing program reports. Served as a Project Manager and Principal Investigator for projects throughout southern California. 2005-2006 – Archaeological Field Technician, ASM Affiliates. Pasadena, CA and Reno, NV. Performed field surveys, subsurface testing programs, and data recovery projects in Barstow (Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center [MCAGCC]), Fontana, Hemet, Moreno Valley, Palm Springs, Ridgecrest (China Lake Naval Air Warfare Station), and Twentynine Palms (MCAGCC), CA. 2005-2006 – Archaeological Field Technician, EDAW, Inc. (currently AECOM). San Diego and Los Angeles, CA. Performed field surveys and data recovery projects in El Centro (Chocolate Mountains Aerial Gunnery Range), Los Angeles (Los Angeles Public School #9 Cemetery Relocation), and Oceanside (Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Air Station), CA.

KPA-07-895.ARS 65 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA Continued

2003-2004 – Archaeological Laboratory Technician, TRC-Garrow Associates, Inc. (currently TRC Solutions). Durham, NC. Performed subsurface testing programs and data recovery projects in Pokomoke City, MD (18-WO-183), Greensboro, NC, and Fayetteville, NC (Fort Bragg Army Airborne and Special Forces Installation). Completed artifact curation and collection management for 18-WO-183 and for various Fort Bragg collections. 2001-2003 – Teaching and Research Assistant, Duke University, Department of Religion. Durham, NC. Screened films, led group discussions, graded documents, and performed research on the Reformation Period to support faculty research projects. 2000 and 2002 – Trench Supervisor, North Carolina State University, Department of History. Aqaba, Kingdom of Jordan. Supervised up to five Jordanian archaeological technicians/laborers during trench excavations for the Roman Aqaba Project (RAP). Experience included the excavation of a probe along the Byzantine Era curtain wall and salvage archaeology within a Nabatean–Early Roman transition period domestic complex. 1999 – Student, Miami University, Department of Anthropology. Oxford, OH. Completed salvage excavation at Milford Works I.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for California Archaeology Register of Professional Archaeologists

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 – Assembly Bill 52 Tribal Consultation Process Overview. Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Group. Temecula, CA. 2013 – Advanced Seminar: Reaching Successful Outcomes in Section 106 Review. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP). Palm Springs, CA. 2010 – The Natural and Cultural History of Ancient Lake Cahuilla. County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency Continuing Education Professional Seminar. Palm Desert, CA. 2010 – Connecting the Dots with a Regional Perspective: Village Footprints (Pechanga Cultural Resources Department). County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency Continuing Education Professional Seminar. Palm Desert, CA. 2009 – Geology for Archaeologists. County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency Continuing Education Professional Seminar. Palm Desert, CA. 2009 – Riverside County History and Research Resources. County of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency Continuing Education Professional Seminar. Palm Desert, CA. 2007 – An Introduction to Professional Practice under Section 106 of the NHPA. SWCA. Mission Viejo, CA. 2006 – Project Management Fundamentals. ZweigWhite AIA/CES course. Michael Brandman Associates, Irvine, CA. 2006 – CEQA Basics: Understanding the California Environmental Process. AEP. Chapman University, Orange, CA. 2006 – Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Land Use Planning and the Protection of Native American Cultural Places. AEP. Irvine, CA.

KPA-07-895.ARS 66 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Jennifer M. Sanka, M.A., RPA Continued

EDUCATION M.A., Religion (Hebrew Bible and Archaeology) – 2003, Duke University, Durham, NC Graduate Certificate, Women’s Studies – 2003, Duke University, Durham, NC B.A., Anthropology, Comparative Religion (with Honors Thesis), and Classics – 2001, Miami University, Oxford, OH

KPA-07-895.ARS 67 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Shannon M. Smith, B.S. Archaeologist

Ms. Smith has gained 10 years of experience in archaeological field methods, laboratory analysis, and historical research. Her duties at L&L include supervising archaeological mitigation monitoring programs and completing Phase I surveys, California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) research, Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands Search (SLS) requests, Native American information scoping, site records, and assisting senior staff with technical reports. She has attained a Bachelor of Science in Anthropology from the University of California, Riverside.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 2017-present – Senior Archaeologist/Historian, L&L Environmental, Inc. Redlands, CA. Supervises monitoring programs and performs field surveys, research, and completes site recordation for projects in southern California. Contributes to technical reports. 2013-2017 – Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) Office Assistant/Cultural Archaeologist, Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Temecula, CA. Assisted with report preparation and background research; organized electronic files, paper files, reports, and other office communications; and served as a cultural resource monitor. 2010-2013 – Archaeological Consultant, Various Companies. CA. Performed records searches, Phase I and Class II surveys, and field excavations. Also completed historical research, document and report production, and detailed laboratory analysis. Served as a supervisor for field crews, a tribal liaison, and completed on-site training and certification. 2007-2008 – Coordinator/Archivist, California Center for Native Nations. Riverside, CA. Coordinated special events, including the 2008 California Indian Conference (CIC). Organized and developed archival systems for the Center. Processed and archived historical documents, such as book collections, film, printed articles, and photographs. Managed daily office staff and activities and maintained the website. 2004-2006 – Research Analyst, Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California, Riverside. Riverside, CA. Processed archaeological reports, reviewed and assigned state primary and trinomial numbers, and completed data entry.

EDUCATION B.S., Anthropology (California, Great Basin, and Southwest Archaeology Emphasis) – 2007, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA B.A., American History (Native American and Early American History Emphasis) – 2007, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA A.A./A.S. – 2004, Mount San Jacinto Community College, San Jacinto, CA

KPA-07-895.ARS 68 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

William R. Gillean, B.S. Archaeologist

Mr. Gillean has gained more than 10 years of archaeological survey, testing, and excavation experience in Arizona, California, and Nevada. His duties at L&L include archaeological mitigation monitoring, Phase I surveys, California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) research, Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands Search (SLS) requests, Native American information scoping, completion of site records, and assisting senior staff with technical reports. He has experience with a wide range of GPS data collectors, photographic equipment, and software programs. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Anthropology with an emphasis in Cultural Resource Management from Cal Poly, Pomona.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 2015-present – Archaeologist, L&L Environmental, Inc. Redlands, CA. Performs field surveys, monitoring, research, and completes site recordation for projects in southern California. Contributes to technical reports. 2013-2015 – Archaeologist, First Carbon Solutions. Irvine, CA. Performs archaeological mitigation monitoring in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California. 2010-2015 – Archaeologist, Atkins. San Bernardino, CA. Performed field surveys, research, completed site records, contributed to technical reports, assisted with Native American information scoping letters, and coordinated with the NAHC for SLS requests. Performed archaeological mitigation monitoring in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California. 2006-2010 – Archaeologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Skyforest, CA. Performed field surveys, subsurface testing programs, and data recovery projects throughout the San Bernardino and Angeles National Forests in southern California. Completed site records, authored and contributed to technical reports, conducted archaeological reconnaissance and inventory of fire suppression activities in support of the Butler II, Grass Valley, Slide, and Station fires. Made recommendations for minimizing impacts to archeological sites and performed mitigation monitoring in archaeologically sensitive areas during project implementation. 2004-2007 – Archaeologist, L&L Environmental, Inc. Corona, CA. Performed field surveys, research, subsurface testing programs, and data recovery projects in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Inyo Counties, California. Contributed to technical reports and performed archaeological mitigation monitoring. 2003-2004 – Field Technician, Center for Archaeological Research, California State University, Bakersfield. Bakersfield, CA. Provided technical support for the archaeological reconnaissance and inventory of over 40 miles of the Southern California Edison power line corridor located within the San Bernardino National Forest.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2010 – Applied NEPA. USDA Forest Service. San Bernardino, CA. 2008 – The Section 106 Essentials. USDA Forest Service. Sacramento, CA.

EDUCATION B.S., Anthropology (Cultural Resource Management Emphasis) – 2002, Cal Poly, Pomona, CA

KPA-07-895.ARS 69 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX B

EIC Records Search Forms

KPA-07-895.ARS 70 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 71 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 72 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX C

Photographs

KPA-07-895.ARS 73 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Photograph 1. Overview of the eastern project Photograph 3. Overview of the western portion area boundary, including State Street. Taken of the project area. Taken from the northwest from the northeast project corner, facing south. project corner, facing southwest.

Photograph 4. Overview of the northern portion of the project area. Taken from the northeast project corner, facing west.

Photograph 2. Overview of the southern project area boundary, including Cottonwood Avenue. Taken from the southeast project corner, facing west.

KPA-07-895.ARS 74 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

Photograph 5. Overview of the project area, Photograph 8. Overview of shallow excavation taken from the southeast project corner. View pits, facing southeast. to the northwest.

Photograph 6. Overview of the project area, Photograph 9. Close-up of drilled borehole in taken from near the northeast project corner. one (1) of the soil excavation pits. View to the southwest.

Photograph 7. Overview of the central portion Photograph 10. Overview of Site San Jacinto of the project area, taken from near the Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1), including Feature 1. northern project boundary. View to the south. View to the northeast.

KPA-07-895.ARS 75 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX D

Sacred Lands Search

KPA-07-895.ARS 76 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 77 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 78 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 79 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 80 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 81 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 82 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX E

Native American Coordination

KPA-07-895.ARS 83 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 84 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 85 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 86 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 87 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 88 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 89 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 90 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 91 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 92 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 93 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 94 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

KPA-07-895.ARS 95 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

APPENDIX F

DPR 523 Form

KPA-07-895.ARS 96 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # 33-28508 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA-RIV-12844 NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 4 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1) P1. Other Identifier: Concrete Slab/Foundation Remains *P2. Location:  Not for Publication  Unrestricted *a. County Riverside and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad San Jacinto, CA Date 1979 T 4S; R 1W; SE ¼ of SW ¼ of Sec 27; S.B. B. M. c. Address Northwest Corner of Cottonwood Avenue and State Street City San Jacinto Zip 92583 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11S, 0502531 mE/ 3738624 mN (NAD83) Approximate center point of the site. e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, decimal degrees, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: 1,530 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). Directions to Resource: From Interstate 10 eastbound, exit at CA-79/Beaumont Avenue (Exit 94). Turn right onto Beaumont Avenue and proceed 7.90 miles. Turn left onto Ramona Expressway and continue for 2.40 miles. Turn right onto North State Street and continue for 1.00 mile to its intersection with Cottonwood Avenue. The site is located approximately 175 feet to the west-northwest of the northwest corner of State Street and Cottonwood Avenue. *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) Site San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1) is a potential historic age resource comprised of a concrete slab (Feature 1). The slab was detected in an area that corresponds to the location of a structure that was built between 1972 and 1978. The structure was subsequently removed between 1978 and 1996 (NETR 2018). The site is currently in poor condition and appears to have been adversely impacted by heavy equipment and weed abatement activities.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) AH2. Foundations/Structure Pads *P4. Resources Present:  Building  Structure  Object  Site  District  Element of District  Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date, accession buildings, structures, and objects.) #) Overview of Feature 1 (Concrete Slab/Foundation Remains). View to the northeast. September 4, 2018. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:  Historic  Prehistoric  Both Constructed between 1972 and 1978 and potentially historic in age. The structure that corresponds to this resource first appears on aerial photographs in 1978, but is not present on photographs dating to 1972 (NETR 2018). *P7. Owner and Address: ______*P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address) J.M. Sanka and W.R. Gillean L&L Environmental, Inc. 721 Nevada Street, Suite 307 Redlands, CA 92373 *P9. Date Recorded: September 4, 2018 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive Pedestrian *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.") L&L Environmental, Inc. (J.M. Sanka and W.R. Gillean). 2018. Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for Tentative Parcel Map No. 35511, ±2.2 Acres in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California.

*Attachments:  NONE  Location Map  Continuation Sheet  Building, Structure, and Object Record  Archaeological Record  District Record  Linear Feature Record  Milling Station Record  Rock Art Record  Artifact Record  Photograph Record  Other (List): ___Sketch Map______

DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information

KPA-07-895.ARS 97 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # 33-28508 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# LOCATION MAP Trinomial CA-RIV-12844

Page 2 of 4 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1) *Map Name: San Jacinto, CA *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1979

Site SJRC-1

DPR 523J (9/2013) * Required information

KPA-07-895.ARS 98 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # 33-28508 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial CA-RIV-12844 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

Page 3 of 4 *Resource Name or #: San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1) *A1. Dimensions: a. Length: 76 feet (northeast-southwest [max]) x b. Width: 30 feet (northwest-southeast [max]). Site dimensions include the length and width of Feature 1 (See A4. Features) with a 10-foot buffer extending in all directions. Method of Measurement:  Paced  Taped Visual estimate  Other: Measured from Google Earth based on site boundary. Method of Determination: (Check any that apply.): Artifacts  Features Soil Vegetation Topography Cut bank Animal burrow Excavation  Property boundary Other (Explain): Reliability of Determination:  High Medium Low Explain: Intensive pedestrian survey with good surface visibility and feature observable at the ground surface. Limitations (Check any that apply): Restricted access Paved/built over Site limits incompletely defined  Disturbances Vegetation Other (Explain): A2. Depth:  None  Unknown Method of Determination: The site appears to be surficial in nature. *A3. Human Remains: Present Absent Possible  Unknown (Explain): None observed. *A4. Features (Number, briefly describe, indicate size, list associated cultural constituents, and show location of each feature on sketch map.): Site SJRC-1 consists of one feature (Feature 1). Feature 1 is a rectangular concrete slab or foundation remnant that measures 56 feet in length by 10 feet in width. This feature is oriented northeast- southwest and is located at UTM: 0502531mE // 3738624mN (NAD83). See Sketch Map. *A5. Cultural Constituents (Describe and quantify artifacts, ecofacts, cultural residues, etc., not associated with features.): Modern refuse was noted near the site. *A6. Were Specimens Collected?  No Yes (If yes, attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.) *A7. Site Condition: Good Fair  Poor (Describe disturbances.): The site is in poor condition and has been impacted by heavy equipment and weed abatement activities. The structure once associated with this site has been demolished and removed. *A8. Nearest Water (Type, distance, and direction.): The San Jacinto Reservoir is located about 1.25 miles to the northwest, while the San Jacinto River is situated 2.00 miles to the northeast of the site. *A9. Elevation: 1,530 feet AMSL A10. Environmental Setting (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure, etc.): The site has been subject to periodic and recent mowing or disking. It is currently heavily disturbed and exhibits non-native vegetation. The site soils are mapped as San Emigdio fine sandy loam (SfA and SeA) (NRCS 2018) and geologic mapping indicates that the site is situated on surficial soils mapped as alluvial sand and clay of valley areas from the Holocene (Qa) (Dibblee and Minch 2003). A11. Historical Information: See A12. Age. *A12. Age: Prehistoric Protohistoric 1542-1769 1769-1848 1848-1880 1880-1914 1914-1945  Post 1945 Undetermined Describe position in regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates if known: This resource was constructed between 1972 and 1978 and is potentially historic in age. The structure that corresponds to this resource first appears on aerial photographs in 1978, but is not present on photographs dating to 1972. The structure was subsequently removed between 1978 and 1996 (NETR 2018). A13. Interpretations (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations): This site reflects the remains of a structure that is no longer extant. A14. Remarks: Site SJRC-1 is currently in poor condition and does not retain sufficient integrity to be considered eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Therefore, L&L recommends this site as not eligible for inclusion in the CRHR. A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references): Dibblee, T. W. and J. A. Minch. 2003. Geologic Map of the San Jacinto Quadrangle, Riverside County, California. U. S. Geological Survey. Nationwide Environmental Title Research (NETR). 2018. Historic Aerials and Topographic Maps. Website accessed August 2018. http://www.historicaerials.com Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2018. Web Soil Survey Search. Website accessed September 2018. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx A16. Photographs (List subjects, direction of view, and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.): See Primary Record. Original Media/Negatives Kept at: N/A *A17. Form Prepared by: J.M. Sanka and W.R. Gillean Date: September 4, 2018 Affiliation and Address: L&L Environmental, Inc. 721 Nevada Street, Suite 307, Redlands, CA 92373

DPR 523C (Rev. 1/1995)(Word 2/2015) * Required information

KPA-07-895.ARS 99 L&L

Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for TPM No. 35511 City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA October 2018

State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # 33-28508 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# SKETCH MAP Trinomial CA-RIV-12844 Page 4 of 4 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) San Jacinto Retail Center-1 (SJRC-1)

*Drawn By: J. Sonnentag of L&L Environmental, Inc. *Date: September 5, 2018 Note: The site boundary for SJRC-1 is shown in red and Feature 1 is shown in black.

DPR 523K (1/95) * Required information

KPA-07-895.ARS 100 L&L