Composition of Water in Clinch River, Tennessee River, and Whiteoak Creek As Related to Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Liquid Wastes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Composition of Water in Clinch River, Tennessee River, and Whiteoak Creek As Related to Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Liquid Wastes Composition of Water in Clinch River, Tennessee River, And Whiteoak Creek as Related to Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Liquid Wastes GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-J Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Composition of Water in Clinch Riven Tennessee Riven And Whiteoak Creek as Related to Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Liquid Wastes By R. J. PICKERING TRANSPORT OF RADIONUCLI DBS BY STREAMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 433-J Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Atomic ILnergy Commission and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HIGKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Stable chemical composition of water Continued Abstract -. ____________________________________ Jl Whiteoak Creek water. J9 Introduction__________________________ 1 Tennessee River water 11 Acknowledgments _____________________________ 2 Constituent comparisons and interstation compar­ Basis for the sampling program___________________ 2 isons _ _____________ _____ 11 Chemical transport in streams____________ 2 Radiochemical composition of water. _________ __ 12 Evidence of transport of radionuclides in solution __ 4 Relationships between stable chemical composition and Evidence of transport of radionuclides in association radionuclide content of the streams _____--_-_ -___ 13 with suspended solids__________-_--__-___-_-_- 4 Conclusions __ ___ _ - -- 14 Location and operation of water-sampling stations______ 5 References cited------ _______ __ ________ 15 Stable chemical composition of water______ ________ 8 Clinch River water.___________________________ 8 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map showing locations of water-sampling stations on the Clinch River and on Whiteoak Creek.. J5 2. Map showing locations of water-sampling stations on the Tennessee River __ __ 6 3. Graph showing history of sampling and analysis of water for Clinch River Study _ 7 4. Graphs showing seasonal variations of selected constituents in Clinch River water at CRM 41.5- 10 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Locations of water-sampling stations..________________________ _. __________________ J6 2. Summary of stable chemical analyses of composite samples of Clinch River water ___________ 8 3. Summary of analyses of composite samples of Clinch River water for trace and minor elements. _. 9 4. Summary of stable chemical analyses of composite samples of Whiteoak Creek water _ ___. 11 5. Summary of stable chemical analyses of composite samples of Tennessee River water .. 12 6. Radionuclide distribution between suspended solids and water phase at six water-sampling stations- 13 in TRANSPORT OF RADIONUCLIDES BY STREAMS COMPOSITION OF WATER IN CLINCH RIVER, TENNESSEE RIVER, AND WHITEOAK CREEK AS RELATED TO DISPOSAL OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTES By R. J. PlCKERING ABSTRACT Most of the cesium-137 entering the Clinch River in Whiteoak Creek water was associated with suspended solids having a di­ Low-level-radioactive wastes have been released to the Clinch ameter larger than that of colloidal particles. This association Rive,r from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in eastern Ten­ persisted in the lower Clinch River, but in the Tennessee River, nessee since 1943, when the Laboratory first began processing cesium-137 was either dissolved in the water or associated with radioactive materials. The fate of the radioactive wastes and solids of colloidal or near-colloidal size. the mechanisms by which the contained radionuclides are dis­ Comparisons of variations in radionuclide content with persed in the river have been investigated as part of the Clinch variations in stable chemical content of water samples indicated River Study, a multiagency effort to evaluate the present and that much of the strontium-90 present in Whiteoak Creek water future use of the river for the. disposal of such wastes. As one may have been associated with precipitated calcium carbonate. element of the study, the composition of water in the streams Close similarities in variations in concentration between ruthe- which receive the radioactive wastes has been characterized nium-106 and cobalt-60 in both Whiteoak Creek and the Clinch through an intensive program of water sampling. River, and correlation of the two radionuclides with nitrate at Radioactive wastes from the Laboratory are released to Whiteoak Dam, reflected their common origin in high-nitrate Whiteoak Creek, which enters the Clinch River 20.8 miles up­ solutions released to the basin of Whiteoak Creek. Their lack stream from where the Clinch River joins the Tennessee River. of correlation with cesium-137 and strontium-90 indicated other Samples of water from the three streams were taken one or more origins for those radionuclides. times daily at seven sampling stations during a period of 3 years and composited into weekly or monthly samples accord­ INTRODUCTION ing to streamflow. Determinations were made of physical para­ meters and of the content of stable chemical constituents, Since 1943, when the Oak Eidge National Laboratory radiochemical constituents, and suspended sediment in the (OKNL) in eastern Tennessee first began processing composite samples. radioactive materials, the Laboratory has released low- Results of the analyses showed that all three streams contain level-radioactive liquid wastes to the Clinch Eiver via water of the calcium bicarbonate type, presumably as a result of the abundance of limestone, and dolomite bedrock underlying Whiteoak Creek. The fate of these radioactive wastes their drainage basins. Tennessee River water is similar in com­ and the mechanisms by which the contained radio­ position to Clinch River water, but contains somewhat less nuclides are dispersed in the river have been investi­ bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, and suspended and dissolved gated through the Clinch Eiver Study, a multiagency solids, and somewhat more sodium and chloride. Whiteoak effort to evaluate the past, present, and future use of Creek water is more highly mineralized than the other two streams, and has a higher average content of sulfate, nitrate, the river for disposal of such wastes (Pickering and phosphorus, and sodium. others, 1965; Struxness and others, 1967). The partici­ Turbidity, apparent color, centrifuged color, and suspended pants in the study were: Oak Eidge National Labora­ solids, all largely controlled by seasonal variations in rainfall tory, operated by Union Carbide Corp.; Tennessee and runoff, varied with time in the same general manner in Game and Fish Commission; Tennessee State Depart­ both the Clinch River and the Tennessee River. Hardness, ment of Public Health, Stream Pollution Control calcium, magnesium, sodium, and chloride showed maximum con­ Board; Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA); U.S. centrations in the autumn, when contribution of ground water Atomic Energy Commission (AEC); U.S. Geological to streamflow is greatest and dilution of wastes is least. Iron and manganese varied in the same manner as suspended solids in Survey (USGS); U.S. Public Health Service (PHS). both rivers. This variation suggests that those constituents were When the study was begun in 1960, the following present in the water primarily in association with solid particles. objectives were established by the Clinch Eiver Study Jl J2 TBANSPOBT OP EADIONUCLIDES BY STREAMS Steering Committee, an advisory group composed of personnel of the Division of Radiological Health. representatives of each of the participating agencies Stable chemical analyses of Whiteoak Creek water, (Morton, 1963, p. 1): (1) To determine the fate of analyses of Clinch Kiver water for trace and minor radioactive materials currently being discharged to the elements, and nonregular radiochemical analyses were Clinch Kiver, (2) to determine and understand the performed by personnel of the Analytical Chemistry mechanisms of dispersion of radionuclides released to Division, ORNL. the river, (3) to evaluate the direct and indirect P. H. Carrigan, Jr., Project Chief of the Clinch hazards of current disposal practices in the river, (4) River Study for the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), to evaluate the overall usefulness of the river for radio­ has offered many valuable suggestions and much help­ active waste disposal purposes, and (5) to provide ful advice pertaining to the study. Discussions of sorp- appropriate conclusions regarding long-term monitor­ tion mechanisms with T. Tamura (ORNL), V. C. Ken­ ing procedures. nedy, (USGS), and E. A. Jenne (USGS) have been The release of low-level radioactive liquid waste to most helpful to the author, as have discussions of radio­ the basin of Whiteoak Creek, which drains the Oak activity in Whiteoak Creek with W. M. McMaster Kidge National Laboratory area, was begun soon after (USGS) and T. F. Lomenick (ORNL). The results of establishment of the Laboratory in 1943. Kadioactive studies of the desorption of radionuclides from White- liquids have entered Whiteoak Creek as a result of oak Creek bottom sediment, performed by W. P. Bon- direct releases of processed waste water from the Labo­ ner (ORNL) and T. Tamura (ORNL), served as valu­ ratory, seepage from liquid waste pits, and drainage able references during the preparation of the report. from solid waste disposal trenches (Browder, 1959). E. R.
Recommended publications
  • Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health in the Clinch and Powell River System a Report on the Aquatic Ecological Health of the Clinch and Powell River System
    June 2015 Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health in the Clinch and Powell River System A Report on the Aquatic Ecological Health of the Clinch and Powell River System Prepared for— Prepared by— US Environmental Protection Kimberly Matthews, Michele Eddy, Agency and Phillip Jones (RTI) Healthy Watersheds Program Mark Southerland, Brenda Morgan, William Jefferson Clinton Building and Ginny Rogers (Versar) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. RTI International Washington, DC 20460 3040 E. Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 RTI Project Number 0213541.004.001.003 Integrated Assessment of Watershed Health in the Clinch and Powell River System June 2015 Prepared by RTI International for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Support for this project was provided by the EPA Healthy Watersheds Program (http://www.epa.gov/healthywatersheds) Disclaimer The information presented in this document is intended to support screening-level assessments of watershed protection priorities and is based on modeled and aggregated data that may have been collected or generated for other purposes. Results should be considered in that context and do not supplant site-specific evidence of watershed health. At times, this document refers to statutory and regulatory provisions, which contain legally binding requirements. This document does not substitute for those provisions or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, states, authorized tribes, or the public and may not apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006
    Freshwater Mussel Survey of Clinchport, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Site: 2006 By: Nathan L. Eckert, Joe J. Ferraro, Michael J. Pinder, and Brian T. Watson Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Wildlife Diversity Division October 28th, 2008 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 5 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 6 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 6 Results .............................................................................................................................. 10 Semi-quantitative .................................................................................................. 10 Quantitative........................................................................................................... 11 Qualitative............................................................................................................. 12 Incidental............................................................................................................... 12 Discussion........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 993-2205 1855 Hwy. 25E at Lakeshore Drive • Bean Station, TN
    The most adventurous, most reliable, 2021 Grainger County Business Directory 1 safest, best Subaru Outback ever. FREQUENTLY CALLED NUMBERS EMERGENCY .........................................................911 FIRE DEPARTMENTS/RESCUE Bean Station Volunteer Fire Dept. ................. 865-935-0351 Bean Station Volunteer Rescue Squad ............865-993-2275 Grainger County Ambulance Service/EMS ...... 865-828-3682 Grainger County Rescue Squad ................... 865-828-4020 Rutledge Volunteer Fire Dept. .......................865-828-5700 Thorn Hill Volunteer Fire Dept. ..................... 865-767-2085 POLICE/SHERIFF DEPT. Bean Station Police .................................. 865-993-5155 Blaine Police ...........................................865-933-1240 Grainger County Sheriff’s Dept. ....................865-828-3613 Rutledge Police ........................................865-828-3660 GOVERNMENT (complete list on page 18) The 2021 Subaru Outback®. The safest Outback ever. Bean Station Town Hall ..............................865-993-3177 Standard Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive + up to 33 MPG** Blaine City Hall ........................................865-933-1240 adds confi dence. Standard EyeSight® Driver Assist Technology puts an extra set of eyes on the road. Grainger County Circuit/Sessions Court ......... 865-828-3605 Go where love takes you. Grainger County Clerk................................865-828-3511 Subaru, Outback and EyeSight are registered trademarks. *EyeSight is a driver-assist system that may not operate optimally
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokee 1805-1
    TREATY WITH THE CHEROKEE, 1805. Done in the presence of- B. Parke, secretary to the commissioner, Davis Floyd, John Gibson, secretary Indiana Territory, Shadrach Bond, John Griffin, a judge of the Indiana Ter- William Biggs, ritorv, John Johnson, B. Chambers, president of the council, Members house of represen- Jesse B. Thomas, Speaker of the House tatives Indiana Territory, of Representatives. W. Wells, agent of Indian affairs, .Tohn Rice Jones, Vigo, colonel of Knox County Militia, Samuel Gwathmey, John Conner, Pierre Menard, .Joseph Barron, Members legislative council Sworn interpreters. Indiana Territory, ADDITIONAL ARTICLE. It is the intention of the contracting parties, that the boundary line herein directed to be run from the north east corner of the Vincennes tract to the boundary line running from the mouth of the Kentucky river, shall not cross the Embarras or Drift Wood fork of White river, but if it should strike the said fork, such an alteration in the direction of the said line is to be made, as will leave the whole of the said fork in the Indian territory. TREATY WITH THE CHEROKEE, 1805.,.,, __0c_t. _ 25_,_1805 _·_ Articles of a treaty agreed upon between the United States of America, 7 stat., 93. by theircornm,i,Ssioners Return J. Meigs rmd Daniel Smith, appointed 2/f~~ation, Apr. to holil conferences with the Cherokee lnd1'.ans, for the JJurpose Q/' · arranqing certain interesting rnatterw with the said Clterokees, of t!ie oru, part, and the undersigned ch1'.efs and head rnen of the said nation, of the other part. · Former treaties rec- ARTICLE I.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridge Reservation Oak Ridge, Tennessee
    ORNL-TM-4694 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY WITH EMPHASIS ON PREHISTORIC SITES OF THE \,pAK RIDGE RESERVATION OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE George F. Fielder, Jr. MARTI'll MARETTA EflEAOY SYSTEMS lIBRARES ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,"- "\- '~ This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic ,.,. Energy Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or use fulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or '." represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. .]' -1 ORNL-TM-4694 -~. (~ ~ Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 ENERGY DIVISION ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY WITH EMPHASIS ON PREHISTORIC SITES OF THE OAK RIDGE RESERVATION OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE George F. Fielder, Jr. {i~ Department of Anthropology . The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee '::\.;! Project conducted and reported in accordance with Union Carbide Corporation, Nuclear Division, Subcontract 3973 MARTIN MARIETTA ENERGY SYSTEMS LIBRARIES OCTOBER 1974 '111~jljl'II"II"II'IIII'II'111 3 445b 0317211 7 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY ------------- (f' Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by I UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION .~t-' for the U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ~. oW r, " ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This survey of the archaeological resources of the Oak Ridge area was conducted with funds provided by Union Carbide Corporation, Nuclear Division. The many personnel of Union Carbide whom we contacted were very cooperative in pro­ viding information about aboriginal sites and aided us in getting access to var~ous areas on the Reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River Trails and Campgrounds
    A NEW HORIZON Innovative Reclamation for a Just Transition A report by Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center, Appalachian Voices, Coalfield Development Corporation, Rural Action, and Downstream Strategies This report was developed by the Reclaiming Appalachia Coalition and was made possible through the financial support of the New York Community Trust, Just Transition Fund, Mertz Gilmore Foundation, Chorus Foundation, Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation, JM Kaplan Fund, and Enterprise Partners. We would like to thank all of these supporters who helped make this report possible. Graphic design & illustration: Jimmy Davidson / Orchard Hill Media ii Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT PROFILES: Kentucky .......................................................................................................................................10 A Brownfields Primer ..............................................................................................................12 Pikeville YMCA Wellness Center .............................................................................................16 Ohio ..............................................................................................................................................18 Moonville Rail Trail .................................................................................................................20 Truetown Paint Pigments .......................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Advisory for Watts Bar Reservoir
    Recreational Advisory for Watts Bar Reservoir The Environmental Protection Agency, the Tennessee Department of Health, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and Tennessee Valley Authority are issuing an advisory regarding boating, swimming and fishing on Watts Bar Reservoir. Emory River Section The public is cautioned to avoid recreational use of the lower Emory River in the vicinity of the ash release down to the confluence of the Emory and Clinch Rivers, which includes adjacent coves, inlets, islands, and sand bars. Small vessel traffic is currently channeled through a well-marked navigational lane, but swimming, jet skiing; water skiing and tubing are not advised at this time in these areas. In addition to construction related risks, contact with submerged or floating ash should be avoided, and if ash is contacted it should be washed off with soap and water. Chronic exposure by incidental ingestion and inhalation should also be avoided. Clinch River and Tennessee River Sections Water- based recreation on the Clinch and Tennessee Rivers should not be impacted this season and can continue. It is safe to swim, boat and eat most kinds of fish. See TDEC's Web site for more information about already existing fish consumption advisories. EPA’s advisory map can be found at www.epakingstontva.com. If you require further information or instructions regarding recreational use of Watts Bar Reservoir, please contact EPA Community Involvement Coordinator, Stephanie Y. Brown at 1-800-564- 7577 or 678-575-8505. An additional point of contact is the Roane County Health Department who can be reached at 865-354-1220.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River Site Land Use and Recreation Technical Report
    L98 160212 005 CLINCH RIVER SITE LAND USE AND RECREATION TECHNICAL REPORT REVISION 2 Prepared For: Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 5A-C Chattanooga, TN 30736 Prepared By: AECOM 10 Patewood Drive Building VI, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 October 2014 Clinch River Site Land Use and Recreation Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 THE SITE AND VICINITY ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 THE CLINCH RIVER SITE ...........................................................................................1-1 1.2 BEAR CREEK ROAD ...................................................................................................1-3 1.3 OAK RIDGE RESERVATION .......................................................................................1-4 1.4 SOUTH SIDE OF THE CLINCH RIVER ........................................................................1-4 2.0 RECREATION ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 MELTON HILL DAM SUSTAINABLE RECREATION AREA .........................................2-1 2.2 GALLAHER RECREATION AREA ...............................................................................2-3 2.3 EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY PARK VISITOR’S OVERLOOK ..........................2-4 2.4 SOUTHERN APPALACHIA RAILWAY MUSEUM.........................................................2-5 2.5 WHEAT COMMUNITY AFRICAN BURIAL GROUND ...................................................2-6
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of John Long of Grainger County, TN
    Descendants of John Long Generation No. 1 3 2 1 1. JOHN LONG (JOSEPH , LONG ) was born 1735 in Ireland/Scotland, and died 1818 in Grainger, TN. He married JANE YOUNG Abt. 1763 in Staunton, Augusta County, Virginia, daughter of ROBERT YOUNG and MARY DOUGLASS. She was born Abt. 1738 in Ireland, and died Bef. 1818 in Grainger County, Tennessee. Notes for JOHN LONG: Page 715.--4th November, 1764. Samuel Long to John Long, £100, 15 acres on Buffalo Creek of James River. Teste: Wm. Davis, James Young, Edward Fan's. NOVEMBER, 1766 (A). Long vs. Hutchison.--John Hutchison, debtor, 1766, to schooling your children, £1, 12, 9. (Signed) John Long. NOVEMBER, 1766 (A). John Long vs. John Hutcheson.--1766, To ORDER BOOK No. X MARCH 23, 1767. (514) John Long, returned not found in bailiwick. Bail"i*wick\, n. [Bailie, bailiff + wick a village.] (Law) The precincts within which a bailiff has jurisdiction; the limits of a bailiff's authority. SEPTEMBER 20, 1786. (170) Rachel, wife of John Alexander, relinquished dower in land conveyed by her husband, John and James Alexander, to John Long. Page 244.--List of book debts due Thomas Stuart--By ; John Caldwell (son Samuel); Robt. Campbell (son to widow); William Campbell (Sander's son); Robt. Campbell (Smith); Samuel Hays (blacksmith); Joseph Long (Forks); Edward Long (taylor); John Montgomery (wagonmaker); Alex. Montgomery (son to John); John Thompson (wheelwright); Jno. Long (Holston). John Long, born in Londonderry, Ireland of Scottish parents, migrated to America and settled in Rockingham Co., VA during the years 1753-1754. JOHN LONG--------and---------TENNESSEE SKETCH OF A PIONEER and HIS PROGENY By His Great-Great-Granddaughter Caroline Grantland Candler Branan John Long emigrated to America from the north of Ireland about the year 1753 or 1754, and settled in Rockingham county, Virginia (at the time, Augusta County), near Staunton.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Fishing
    Bank Fishing The following bank fishing locations were compiled by 4. Fish are very sensitive to sounds and shadows and can TWRA staff to inform anglers of areas where you can fish see and hear an angler standing on the bank. It is good without a boat. The types of waters vary from small ponds to fish several feet back from the water’s edge instead and streams to large reservoirs. You might catch bluegill, of on the shoreline and move quietly, staying 20 to 30 bass, crappie, trout, catfish, or striped bass depending on feet away from the shoreline as you walk (no running) the location, time of year, and your skill or luck. from one area to the other. Point your rod towards the All waters are open to the public. Some locations are sky when walking. Wearing clothing that blends in privately owned and operated, and in these areas a fee is re- with the surroundings may also make it less likely for quired for fishing. It is recommended that you call ahead if fish to be spooked. you are interested in visiting these areas. We have included 5. Begin fishing (casting) close and parallel to the bank these fee areas, because many of them they are regularly and then work out (fan-casting) toward deeper water. stocked and are great places to take kids fishing. If you’re fishing for catfish, keep your bait near the bottom. Look around for people and obstructions Bank Fishing Tips before you cast. 1. Fish are often near the shore in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River Nuclear Site SPA, Seismic-Geotechnical Audit
    AUDIT PLAN FOR AREAS COVERED IN SECTION 2.5 OF THE SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT, CLINCH RIVER NUCLEAR SITE EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION APPLICANT: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) DATES: May 8-9, 2017 LOCATIONS: TVA Knoxville Office Complex 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Clinch River Nuclear Site Oak Ridge, Tennessee AUDIT TEAM: David Heeszel, Team Leader (NRO/DSEA/RGS) Alice Stieve (NRO/DSEA/RGS) Weijun Wang (NRO/DSEA/RGS) Ricardo Rodriguez (NRO/DSEA/RGS) Laurel Bauer (NRO/DSEA/RGS) PROJECT MANAGER: Allen Fetter (NRO/DNRL/LB3) BACKGROUND AND AUDIT OBJECTIVE Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted geologic, seismic and geotechnical engineering characterization information to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) as part of their Clinch River Nuclear Site (CRNS) Early Site Permit (ESP) application. In preparation for the audit, the NRC staff reviewed the data and information within Section 2.5 of the Site Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), as supplemented, and identified information needs that the staff requires to complete its review. In conjunction with the information audit, which will take place at the TVA Knoxville Office, most members of the NRC staff will visit the CRN site and surrounding area in an effort to become familiar with the site layout, the surrounding geologic and tectonic features, and the site physiography. At the CRN Site, NRC staff will also have the opportunity to examine geologic core samples collected during site investigations. Both venues will provide the staff an opportunity to discuss the information needs identified during the staff’s initial review of the application and associated SSAR sections with TVA’s subject matter experts (SMEs), staff and contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River Small Modular Reactor Site, Regional Surface Water Use
    L98 160205 020 {{{[Information Category per Part B of this attachment]- Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4)}}} Public Version {{{Proprietary Information - Withheld Under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4)}}} NOTICE: This electronic message transmission contains information which may be TVA SENSITIVE, TVA RESTRICTED or TVA CONFIDENTIAL. Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties. THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Clinch River Small Modular Reactor Site Regional Surface Water Use Study Charles E. Bohac and Amanda K. Bowen 03/04/2014 Revision 1 ‐ 4/10/2014 Revision 2 ‐ 4/24/2015 This engineering study has been prepared as a supporting document for the Clinch River Small Modular Reactor Site (CR SMR) Early Site Permit and is being distributed for project use only. The study provides a summary of historical, present and predicted future surface water use in the CR SMR region based on available information sources. Estimated surface water demands of the proposed small modular reactor are also discussed. NOTICE: This electronic message transmission contains information which may be TVA SENSITIVE, TVA RESTRICTED or TVA CONFIDENTIAL. Any misuse or unauthorized disclosure can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]