NORMAN VANCE Niebuhr in England: History, Faith, and Order

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NORMAN VANCE Niebuhr in England: History, Faith, and Order NORMAN VANCE Niebuhr in England: History, Faith, and Order in BENEDIKT STUCHTEY AND PETER WENDE (eds.), British and German Historiography 1750-1950. Traditions, Perceptions and Transfers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) pp. 83–98 ISBN: 978 0 19 920235 5 The following PDF is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence. Anyone may freely read, download, distribute, and make the work available to the public in printed or electronic form provided that appropriate credit is given. However, no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered or transformed, or serve as the basis for a derivative work. The publication rights for this volume have formally reverted from Oxford University Press to the German Historical Institute London. All reasonable effort has been made to contact any further copyright holders in this volume. Any objections to this material being published online under open access should be addressed to the German Historical Institute London. DOI: 5 Niebuhr in England: History, Faith, and Order NORMAN V ANGE In the earlier nineteenth century it was a surprisingly contro- versial undertaking to subject Roman history to critical scrutiny, an endeavour particularly associated with the German diplomat and pioneer Roman historian Barthold Georg Niebuhr (1776-1831) and his British disciple Thomas Arnold (1795-1842), Headmaster of Rugby School and a prominent liberal churchman. British commen.tators tended to feel that this revisionist historiography had a powerful if indirect bearing on contemporary political and religious issues. Conservatives, worried by any challenge to traditional authority, resorted to alarm and despondency, reminding themselves that nothing but trouble could come from German scholarship. (Had not Ovid long ago described 'Germania' as 'rebellatrix', Tristia 3. 12. 47 ?) But progressives such as Arnold and Niebuhr's English translators Hare and Thirlwall saw in · Niebuhr encouragement for their own visions of a more generous and liberal social order and a more enlightened understanding of God, man, and nature. In the normal course of things heavy consumption of the roast beef of Old England and the sturdy maintenance of traditional faith and order were the English antidotes to the crisis of authority stemming from revolutionary France. Clerical schoolmasters, though often mean about the roast beef, had their own ways of supporting the status quo and making sure that the teaching of history in particular was never in any danger of becoming somewhat too sensational. Modern history was often largely ignored in the schoolroom as too political; ancient history was preferred because it could be read, largely apolitically, as a safe repository of NORMAN VANCE timeless moral example, not really very different from Holy Scripture. This view of the matter was not confined to conservative clerical schoolmasters. William Godwin, radical author of Political justice, wrote to his new disciple Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1812 that it is universally agreed that, next to the history of our own country, the histories of Greece and Rome most deserve to be studied. Why? Because in them the achievements of the human species have been most admirable: in Rome, in high moral and social qual- ities; in Greece, both in them, and also in literature and art.1 But this view was becoming old-fashioned, at least in rela- tion to Roman history, even before Niebuhr's influence was felt in England. It was already accepted that there was little that was admirable or exemplary at an individual level in Roman imperial history after the death of Augustus, and even less after the passing of the Antonines, and there was much for schoolmasters to skate over as quickly as possible. There was more interest, and more edification, in the earlier books of Livy dealing with the foundation of Rome and the achievements of early civic heroes such as Horatius on the bridge or the grimly impartial Lucius Junius Brutus. But even the history of republican Rome, periodically tumul- tuous, was tainted for some by French revolutionary appro- priations of the land-reforming Gracchi and the oath-swearing Horatii celebrated by Jacques-Louis David and Roman libertas ruthlessly approximated to liberté, not to mention égalité and fraternite. This was so much the case that in 1808 the Anglo-Irish educational theorist Richard Lovell Edgeworth, father of the novelist Maria Edgeworth, was of the opinion that Roman history need not be taught in Irish charity schools in case it gave the pupils politically inconve- nient ideas: 'to inculcate democracy and a foolish hankering after undefined liberty is not necessary in Ireland. ' 2 The challenges to established authority represented by ' Godwin to Shelley, 10 Dec. 1812, quoted in a note in The Letters ofPercy Bysshe Shelf.ey, ed. Frederick L.Jones, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1964), i. 340-1. • Quoted in David Fitzpatrick, 'The Futility of History: A Failed Experiment in Irish Education', in Ciaran Brady (ed.), Ideology and the Historians (Historical Studies 17; Dublin, 1991), 170. Niebuhr in England sceptical interrogations of already sometimes inflammatory history were bound to cause alarm to conservative critics looking for trouble. This had been happening since the seventeenth century. It is tempting to dismiss such criticism as hysterical, making unwarranted connections between purely historical and antiquarian matters and the sensitive political and religious issues of the day. But Niebuhr made the connections himself, reading ancient history as a north European liberal in politics (or so it seemed in Britain) and a liberal Protestant in religion. For him, political freedom had mattered throughout history. If popular enthusiasms were problematic in the aftermath of the French Revolution he made no secret of his interest in and enthusiasm for popu- lar beliefs, perceptions, and traditions in the ancient world, perhaps more revealing, he claimed, than the views of the philosophers, and the basis of the largely mythic history of early Rome. Such democratic preferences did not always go down well in self-consciously counter-revolutionary Britain. The son of a pioneering Arabian explorer, Carsten Niebuhr, Niebuhr belongs with nineteenth-century explor- ers, inventors, and scientists as much as with scholars. The pioneer geologist Charles Lyell quoted with approval his comment that 'he who calls what has vanished back into being, enjoys a bliss like that of creating' .3 Niebuhr was a romantic adventurer embarked on a voyage of discovery, a quest for origins, with a courageous, perhaps reckless disre- gard for the dangers in store. The danger from hostile British critics was not immediately apparent. The first German edition of the Römische Geschichte (1811-12) was hardly noticed in Britain, partly because from the point of view of most Oxford and Cambridge ancient historians it was veiled in the decent obscurity of a learned language which they did not know or even want to know. There is no copy of this first edition in the Bodleian Library in Oxford. In July 1822 a reviewer of other books on early Roman history in the Quarterly Reviewcommended Niebuhr in passing but gave it as his opinion that in Britain 'not half a dozen persons have 3 Charles Lyell, The PrinciplP.s of Geology, 2 vols. (London, 1830-3), i. 74, quoted in S.J. Gould, Time'.sArrow, Time'.s Cycle (Harmondsworth, 1988), 155. 86 NORMAN VANCE read him' .4 It was not until 1827 that a slightly rugged English translation appeared, only to be rendered instantly obsolete by the substantially revised second edition of the German text (1827-32) which was rapidly translated into rather better English by Julius Hare and Connop Thirlwall, with a third volume by William Smith, between 1828 and 1842. Both editions opened with a lengthy discussion of the ulti- mate, probably multiple origins of the Italian people, neces- sarily inconclusive because it engaged with doubtful matters of myth, legend, and prehistory. Perhaps comparisons would help. Even in the terser first edition Niebuhr risked some coat-trailing comparisons with the Old Testament, less star- tling in Germany than they would have been in England or even in Scotland, often more intellectually adventurous. In discussing conflicting accounts of the possible origins of the Oenotrians, who might or might not have been descended from one Oenotrius, he claims that 'no sober-minded man can treat these genealogies as historical narratives', explicitly compares them with genealogies offered in the tenth and eleventh chapters of Genesis, and says of the latter as of a matter beyond argument that 'they are palpably grounded upon very false assumptions' .s Nobody in Britain seems to have worried about this, or even noticed, for seventeen years, but in the second edition, soon available in translation, the comparisons were more wide-ranging and detailed and this time they did not pass without comment. Many societies, Niebuhr insisted, preserved stories of ancient giants or monsters swept away by catastrophe to make room for their ancestors: So the later Jews dreamt of giants before the deluge; so the Greeks of the Titans of Phlegra, and of those who perished in the flood of Deucalion or of Ogyges: so the savages of North America fable of the Mammoth, that the devastated world had invoked the light- nings of heaven, and not in vain, against the reason-gifted monster, the man of the primitive age. So Italy in its popular legends had the Campanian giants.6 4 'Early History of Rome', Qy,arterly Review, 27 Quly 1822), 281. 5 B. G. Niebuhr, The Roman History, trans. F. A. Walters, 2 vols. (London, 1827), i. 35f. 6 B. G. Niebuhr, The History of Rome, 3 vols., trans. J. C. Hare, C. Thirlwall, and (vol. iii) W. Smith (Cambridge, 1828, 1832; London, 1842), i. 145. Niebuhr in England 87 Noah and Deucalion, biblical and classical traditions, were old friends in the popular historical imagination but it was audacious if not positively naughty to bring in the Shawnee and Delaware Indians.
Recommended publications
  • Kelley Reviewed Work(S): Source: the American Historical Review, Vol
    Gaius Noster: Substructures of Western Social Thought Author(s): Donald R. Kelley Reviewed work(s): Source: The American Historical Review, Vol. 84, No. 3 (Jun., 1979), pp. 619-648 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Historical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1855400 . Accessed: 09/11/2012 06:39 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Oxford University Press and American Historical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org Gaius Noster: Substructuresof Western Social Thought DONALD R. KELLEY "tu regereimperio populos, Romane, memento... GAIUS, THE MOST INFLUENTIAL OF CLASSICAL JURISTS, is apparently a modern discovery. The dramatic storyof his resurrectionhas oftenbeen told. In i8i6 the historian Barthold Georg Niebuhr came across a manuscript in Verona, a text from Saint Jerome writtenover a much earlier work. He reported this palimpsest (at some points ter scriptus,a double palimpsest) to his friend Friedrich Karl von Savigny, the greatest legal scholar of the age and the emerging leader of the so-called Historical School of Law. Savigny immedi- ately recognized it as the work of the second-centuryjurist Gaius, otherwise preserved only in fragmentaryform in that great sixth-centuryanthology, the Digestof Justinian.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Daylight Upon Magic': Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy
    ‘Daylight upon magic’: Stained Glass and the Victorian Monarchy Michael Ledger-Lomas If it help, through the senses, to bring home to the heart one more true idea of the glory and the tenderness of God, to stir up one deeper feeling of love, and thankfulness for an example so noble, to mould one life to more earnest walking after such a pattern of self-devotion, or to cast one gleam of brightness and hope over sorrow, by its witness to a continuous life in Christ, in and beyond the grave, their end will have been attained.1 Thus Canon Charles Leslie Courtenay (1816–1894) ended his account of the memorial window to the Prince Consort which the chapter of St George’s Chapel, Windsor had commissioned from George Gilbert Scott and Clayton and Bell. Erected in time for the wedding of Albert’s son the Prince of Wales in 1863, the window attempted to ‘combine the two ele- ments, the purely memorial and the purely religious […] giving to the strictly memorial part, a religious, whilst fully preserving in the strictly religious part, a memorial character’. For Courtenay, a former chaplain- in-ordinary to Queen Victoria, the window asserted the significance of the ‘domestic chapel of the Sovereign’s residence’ in the cult of the Prince Consort, even if Albert’s body had only briefly rested there before being moved to the private mausoleum Victoria was building at Frogmore. This window not only staked a claim but preached a sermon. It proclaimed the ‘Incarnation of the Son of God’, which is the ‘source of all human holiness, the security of the continuousness of life and love in Him, the assurance of the Communion of Saints’.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANS F/ 52 PART L: the KINGS of ROME
    ruuLAE rcWAE STORIES OF FAMOLJS ROMANS f/ 52 PART l: THE KINGS OF ROME 1 iam dEdum: "for a long time already.' 2 aegrl ferre, to take badly, resent. Sex. Tarquinil: the youngest son ofTarquinius Superbus; see 11:17 and the note there" 3 ut . , . statuerent: "that they decided," result clause (see the grammar note on page 56). 5 Tarquinius CollEtlnus, -I (m.), Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus (nephew of Tarquinius Superbus and husband oflucretia). sorOre . n6tus: "born from the sister," ablative ofsourcewith nEtus, perfect participle ofthe verb n6scor. 6 contubernium, -i (n.), the sharing of a tent in the army, the status of be- ing messmates. in contuberrrid iuvenum rEgi0rum . erat: "was a messmate of . ." Ardea, -ae (f), Ardea (a town to the south of Rome). 7 *hber, libera, hberum, free, outspoken, unrestricted, unrestrained. frnusquisque, tnaquaeque, tnumquodque, each one. 8 *nutue, -ts (f), daughter-in-1aw. 9 *ltxus, -0.s (m.), luxury, luxurious living, extravagance. *d6prehend6, d6prehendere (3), dEprehendl, d6preh6nsum, to get hold of, surprise, catch in the act. CollEtia, -ae (f), Collatia (a town in Latium). 10 LucrEtia, -ae (f), Lucretia (wife of Collatinus). lanificium, -I (n.), wool-spinning, weaving (a traditional occupation of a Roman housewife). L1 offendO, offendere (3), offeadi, oftnsum, to strike against, find, en- counf,er. pudlcus, -a, -lrm, chase, virtuous. *itrdicd (1), to judge, proclaim, declare, think. 12 *corrump6, corrumpere (3), corrtrpl, corruptum, to break, corrupt, seduce, Ad quan corrumpendam: "To seduce her," gerundive (see the grammar note on page 59). 13 propinquitds, propinquitdtig (f), family relationship. Sextus Tarquinius was admitted to the house because he was a rela- tive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puppet Show of Memory
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Library DA 574.B25A3 1922 Puppet show of memor 3 1924 028 027 245 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028027245 THE PUPPET SHOW OF MEMORY By the same Author THE BLACK PRINCE GASTON DE FOIX MAHASENA COLLECTED POEMS DESIDERIO POEMS—1914-1919 TRANSLATIONS ANCIENT AND MODERN WITH THE RUSSIANS IN MANCHURIA A YEAR IN RUSSIA THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE LANDMARKS IN RUSSIAN LITERATURE AN OUTLINE OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE RUSSIAN ESSAYS AND STUDIES THE GLASS MENDER FORGET-ME-NOT AND LILY OF THE VALLEY ORPHEUS IN MAYFAIR DEAD LETTERS DIMINUTIVE DRAMAS LOST DIARIES THE GREY STOCKING PASSING BY R.F.C. H.Q. OVERLOOKED THE PUPPET SHOW OF MEMORY BY MAURICE BARING LONDON: WILLIAM HEINEMANN NOTE MY thanks are due to Messrs. Methuen for allowing me to use in Chapters XVI.-XIX. some matter which has already appeared in A Year in Russia and Russian Essays, two books published by them; to Mr. Leo Maxe for allowing me to use an article on Sarah Bernhardt which appeared in the National Review, and has been re-written for this book; to Father C. C. Martindale and Mr. Desmond McCarthy for kindly cor- recting the proofs. M. B. CONTENTS PAGE I. The Nursery .... I II. The Nursery and the Schoolroom . M III. Membland ... 31 IV. Membland ...
    [Show full text]
  • Lays of Ancient Rome
    Lays of Acient Rome Lays of Ancient Rome By Thomas Babbington Macaulay 1 Lays of Acient Rome Preface Horatius The Lay The Battle of the Lake Regillus The Lay Virginia The Lay The Prophecy of Capys The Lay That what i called the hitory of the Kings and early Consuls of Rome is to a great extent fabulus, few scholars have, since the ti of Beaufort, ventured to deny. It is certain that, more than three hundred and sixty years after the date ordinarily assigned for the foundatio of the city, the public records were, with scarcely an exception, destroyed by the Gauls. It is certain that the oldest annals of the coonwealth were compiled mre than a century and a half after th destruction of the records. It is certain, therefore, that the great Latin writers of the Augustan age did not possss those materials, without which a trustworthy account of the infancy of the republic could not possibly be framed. Those writers own, indeed, that the chronicles to which they had access were filled with battles that were never fought, and Consuls that were never inaugurated; and we have abundant proof that, in these chronicles, events of the greatest importance, suc as the issue of the war with Porsa and the issue of the war with Brennus, were grossly misrepresented. Under thes circumstances a wise man will look with great suspicio on the lged whi has com do to us. He will perhaps be inclined to regard th princes who are said to have founded the civil and religious institutions of Rom, the sons of Mars, and the husband of Egeria, as mere mythgial persage, of the same class with Persus and Ixion.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarissimi Viri Joshua Roberts
    Clarissimi Viri Joshua Roberts Livy’s histories of Horatius Cocles and Gnaeus Marcius Coriolanus The University of Georgia Department of Classics Summer Institute June, 2015 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit. 1 Tibi, Domine, qui me potentem facit. Maximas gratias fidelissimae uxori carissimisque liberis, qui semper efficiunt me laetum domum redire. Thank you to my Latin teachers: Mrs. Counts, Mr. Spearman, and Ms. Brown for introducing me to Latin. Mr. Philip W. Rohleder, who was the very embodiment of what my career has become. Uncle Phil, I cannot thank you enough for your friendship and your excellent example. I am still trying to be like you. Dr. Evelyn Tharpe, Dr. Ron Bohrer, and Dr. Josh Davies at the University of Tenneessee at Chattanooga. Dr. Bohrer, you showed me how to be merciful as a teacher. My professors in the University of Georgia Summer Institute faculty: Dr. Christine Albright, Dr. Naomi Norman, Dr. Robert Harris, Dr. John Nicholson, and Dr. Charles Platter. I am a better teacher because of you. Special thanks to Dr. Platter and Dr. Nicholson for serving as the committee for my final teaching project. JLSR MMXV 2 Contents Care Lector, .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Livy’s Preface to Ab urbe condita ................................................................................................................ 8 Horatius at the Bridge, II.10 ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Canterbury Association
    The Canterbury Association (1848-1852): A Study of Its Members’ Connections By the Reverend Michael Blain Note: This is a revised edition prepared during 2019, of material included in the book published in 2000 by the archives committee of the Anglican diocese of Christchurch to mark the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury settlement. In 1850 the first Canterbury Association ships sailed into the new settlement of Lyttelton, New Zealand. From that fulcrum year I have examined the lives of the eighty-four members of the Canterbury Association. Backwards into their origins, and forwards in their subsequent careers. I looked for connections. The story of the Association’s plans and the settlement of colonial Canterbury has been told often enough. (For instance, see A History of Canterbury volume 1, pp135-233, edited James Hight and CR Straubel.) Names and titles of many of these men still feature in the Canterbury landscape as mountains, lakes, and rivers. But who were the people? What brought these eighty-four together between the initial meeting on 27 March 1848 and the close of their operations in September 1852? What were the connections between them? In November 1847 Edward Gibbon Wakefield had convinced an idealistic young Irishman John Robert Godley that in partnership they could put together the best of all emigration plans. Wakefield’s experience, and Godley’s contacts brought together an association to promote a special colony in New Zealand, an English society free of industrial slums and revolutionary spirit, an ideal English society sustained by an ideal church of England. Each member of these eighty-four members has his biographical entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Leopold Ranke's Archival Turn: Location and Evidence
    Roskilde University Leopold Ranke’s Archival Turn Location and Evidence in Modern Historiography Eskildsen, Kasper Risbjerg Published in: Modern Intellectual History DOI: 10.1017/S1479244308001753 Publication date: 2008 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Eskildsen, K. R. (2008). Leopold Ranke’s Archival Turn: Location and Evidence in Modern Historiography. Modern Intellectual History, 5(3), 425-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244308001753 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 Modern Intellectual History, 5, 3 (2008), pp. 425–453 C 2008 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S1479244308001753 Printed in the United Kingdom leopold ranke’s archival turn: location and evidence in modern historiography∗ kasper risbjerg eskildsen Department of Philosophy and Science Studies, Roskilde University, Denmark From 1827 to 1831 the German historian Leopold von Ranke travelled through Germany, Austria, and Italy, hunting for documents and archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Lays of Ancient Rome
    Lays of Ancient Rome Thomas Babbington Macaulay The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lays of Ancient Rome, by Macaulay Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before posting these files!! Please take a look at the important information in this header. We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an electronic path open for the next readers. Do not remove this. **Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** **Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** *These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations* Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and further information is included below. We need your donations. Lays of Ancient Rome by Thomas Babbington Macaulay March, 1997 [Etext #847] The Project Gutenberg Etext of Lays of Ancient Rome, by Macaulay *****This file should be named lrome10.txt or lrome10.zip****** Corrected EDITIONS of our etexts get a new NUMBER, lrome11.txt. VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, lrome10a.txt. Made by David Reed of [email protected] and [email protected]. We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance of the official release dates, for time for better editing. Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. The official release date of all Project Gutenberg Etexts is at Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment and editing by those who wish to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Lays of Ancient Rome by Thomas Babington Macaulay
    % nvy tkvr /S^lU, CsUdx *TV IrrTCV* U- tv/ <n\V ftjw ^ Jl— i$fO-$[ . To live ^ Iz^l.cL' dcn^LU *~d |V^ ^ <X ^ ’ tri^ v^X H c /f/- v »»<,<, 4r . N^P’iTH^JJs y*^ ** 'Hvx ^ / v^r COLLECTION OF BRITISH AUTHORS. VOL. CXCVIII. LAYS OF ANCIENT ROME BY THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY. IN ONE VOLUME. TATJCHNITZ EDITION". By the same Author, THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND.10 vols. CRITICAL AND HISTORICAL ESSAYS.5 vols. SPEECHES .2 vols. BIOGRAPHICAL ESSAYS.1 vol. WILLIAM PITT, ATTERBURY.1 VOl. THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF LORD MACAULAY. By his Nephew GEORGE OTTO TREVELYAN, M.P.4 vols. SELECTIONS FROM THE WRITINGS OF LORD MACAULAY. Edited by GEORGE OTTO TREVELYAN, M.P. * . 2 vols. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from Getty Research Institute https://archive.org/details/laysofancientrom00maca_3 LAYS OF ANCIENT ROME: WITH IVEY” AND “THE AEMADA” THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY. COPYRIGHT EDITION, LEIPZIG BERNHARD TAUCIINITZ 1851. CONTENTS. Page PREFACE . i HORATIUS.35 THE BATTLE OF THE LAKE REGILLUS.81 VIRGINIA.143 THE PROPHECY OF CAPYS.189 IVRY: A SONG OF THE HUGUENOTS ..... 221 THE ARMADA: A FRAGMENT.231 4 PREFACE. That what is called the history of the Kings and early Consuls of Rome is to a great extent fabulous, few scholars have, since the time of Beaufort, ven¬ tured to deny. It is certain that, more than three hundred and sixty years after the date ordinarily assigned for the foundation of the city, the public records were, with scarcely an exception, destroyed by the Gauls. It is certain that the oldest annals of the commonwealth were compiled more than a cen¬ tury and a half after this destruction of the records.
    [Show full text]
  • Niebuhr and ʿabd Al-Raḥmān Aġa’S Das Innere Von Afrika Camille Lefebvre
    The Life of a Text: Carsten Niebuhr and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aġa’s Das innere von Afrika Camille Lefebvre To cite this version: Camille Lefebvre. The Life of a Text: Carsten Niebuhr and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aġa’s Das innere von Afrika. Benedetta Rossi; Toby Green. Landscapes, Sources and Intellectual Projects of the West African Past, 6, Brill, 2018, African History, 978-90-04-38018-9. halshs-03019172 HAL Id: halshs-03019172 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03019172 Submitted on 23 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CHAPTER 18 The Life of a Text: Carsten Niebuhr and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aġa’s Das innere von Afrika Camille Lefebvre In July 1772, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aġa, a Tripolitan ambassador, and his entourage including two African slaves arrived in Copenhagen to renegotiate peace with the Nordic states of Denmark and Sweden. Muslim missions were a common and fairly regular phenomenon of the 18TH century Mediterranean cross-cultural diplomacy.1 Cases of Ottoman, Persian, Moroccan or Maghreb envoys coming to Europe to negotiate conditions for the maintenance of peace against a payment for their ruler were not uncommon.2 But there is more than this to the story of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Aġa’s four-month stay in Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman History
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028270894 Cornell University Library DG 207.L5F85 1899 Roman histor 3 1924 028 270 894 Titus Livius Roman History The World's TITUS LIVIUS. Photogravure from an engraving in a seventeenth-century edition of Livy's History. Roman History By Titus Livius Translated by John Henry Freese, Alfred John Church, and William Jackson Brodribb With a Critical and Biographical Introduction and Notes by Duffield Osborne Illustrated New York D. Appleton and Company 1899 LIVY'S HISTORY the lost treasures of classical literature, it is doubtful OFwhether any are more to be regretted than the missing books of Livy. That they existed in approximate en- tirety down to the fifth century, and possibly even so late as the fifteenth, adds to this regret. At the same time it leaves in a few sanguine minds a lingering hope that some un- visited convent or forgotten library may yet give to the world a work that must always be regarded as one of the greatest of Roman masterpieces. The story that the destruction of Livy was effected by order of Pope Gregory I, on the score of the superstitions contained in the historian's pages, never has been fairly substantiated, and therefore I prefer to acquit that pontiff of the less pardonable superstition involved in such an act of fanatical vandalism. That the books preserved to us would be by far the most objectionable from Gregory's alleged point of view may be noted for what it is worth in favour of the theory of destruction by chance rather than by design.
    [Show full text]