DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Linguistics Study Guide Anna Gartsman & Laura Hughes Northeastern University Senior Honors Project 2006-2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Linguistics Study Guide Anna Gartsman & Laura Hughes Northeastern University Senior Honors Project 2006-2007 Honors Project Cover Page Introductory Linguistics Study Guide By Anna Gartsman and Laura Hughes, Class of 2007 May 2007 Department of Linguistics College of Arts & Sciences Northeastern University Advisor: Janet Randall Project field: Linguistics Colleges/Majors: • Anna Gartsman: o School of Computer Science: Computer Science and Cognitive Psychology o School of Arts & Sciences: Linguistics • Laura Hughes o School of Arts & Sciences: Linguistics and Psychology Abstract: A step-by-step guide to the major areas of introductory-level theoretical linguistics (phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics) with a focus on practical problem-solving. Designed to assist students in low-level linguistics classes and tutors of same by providing additional explanations, examples and exercises. Introduction to Linguistics Study Guide Anna Gartsman & Laura Hughes Northeastern University Senior Honors Project 2006-2007 Contents Phonetics Syntax The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) Constituency Natural Classes Lexical Categories Features English Phrase Structure & Syntax Trees Ambiguous Sentences Phonology Complex Sentences Minimal Pairs Transformations Phonemes and Allophones Complementary & Contrastive Distribution Semantics Environments Connotation & Denotation Determining the Underlying Phoneme Processes of Semantic Change Rules Theta roles Analyzing Data Sets Tautologies, Contradictions, & Phonological Processes Contingencies Sense & Reference Morphology Presupposition & Entailment Basic Lexical Categories (Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb) Pragmatics Morphology Terms & Definitions Grice’s Cooperative Principle, Maxims of Subcategorization Frames Conversation & Conversational Morphology Trees Implicature Zero-Derivation Speech Acts Morphology in Other Languages Brown & Levinson’s Politeness Theory Word Formation Processes Answers to Exercises Tables & Charts References 2 Phonetics Phonetics is the study of speech sounds. Lessons The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) Overview & Tips IPA Example Chart: Consonants IPA Example Chart: Vowels IPA Transcription Exercises Natural Classes Overview, Examples & Tips Consonant Chart Vowel Chart Exercises Features Overview, Examples & Tips Example Problems List of Distinctive Features (Consonants) List of Distinctive Features (Vowels) Distinctive Feature Chart (Consonants) Distinctive Feature Chart (Vowels) Exercises 3 The International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) Objective: Transcribe English speech sounds in the international phonetic alphabet. What is the international phonetic alphabet (IPA), and why do we need one? The International Phonetic Alphabet is a way of transcribing speech as it’s pronounced, which means it can be used to transcribe any language (so long as there are symbols for the sounds spoken in that language). Because there is a one-to-one correspondence between symbols and sounds in IPA, there are no problems with weird, ambiguous spelling, silent letters, etc. such as we often find in written English. In phonetics and phonology, we use IPA to represent data sets of sounds from different languages. Using words written in IPA, we can focus on the sounds of a language without having to learn the writing systems of different languages—many of which don’t have any writing system at all, or have one that isn’t based on sounds (such as Chinese). You can use your textbook or handouts or the charts provided here to learn the IPA symbols used for English consonants and vowels. Since many languages have sounds we don’t use in English, you may be introduced to more symbols in later problem sets; but these symbols are all you need to start transcribing English speech. Transcription Tips: • Sounds Not Spelling When transcribing words into the IPA, focus on the sounds, not the way that they’re spelled. Say the word aloud. • Normal (Fast) Speech Be careful not to say the word too slowly and carefully, because that may change some of the sounds. The idea is to transcribe the way you usually pronounce the word in normal speech. • IPA Symbols Are Not the Same As Letters An IPA symbol may look like an English letter, but represent a different sound than that letter normally does. This is especially true of vowels. Note, for example, that [e] is the vowel sound in “say” or “weigh”, not in “bed” (that would be []). • Ignore Silent Letters Many English words have silent letters, the “e” at the end of “cape,” for example. Remember, the difference between “cap” and “cape” doesn’t have to do with the “e”—it’s a different vowel between [k] and [p] (that is, [kæp] vs. [kep]). • Your Pronunciation May Vary Even within English, people with different dialects may pronounce words differently. (Again, this is especially true of vowels!) There may be more than one way to transcribe a word, but there is only one way to transcribe the word the way you say it. • Use Your Friends If you’re worried that your accent or dialect is too non-standard, or if you can’t tell what sound you’re saying, ask someone else to say the word. If you’re worried about “priming” them to pronounce the word the way you do, write down the word and have them read it to you. The charts on the following pages give examples of the English consonants and vowels. We transcribed the words into IPA using our own dialect of Standard American English; your mileage may vary. (The symbols in parentheses show alternative symbols for the same sound.) 4 Phonetic Alphabet Chart: Consonants of English IPA Symbol Example (Standard Orthography) Example (IPA) p powers, superhero, cape pawrz, suprhiro, kep b Batman, Robin, lab bæmæn, rabn, læb t toxic, Green Lantern, invisible jet taksk, rin læntrn, nvzbl dt d Doctor Doom, incredible, Alfred daktr dum, nkrdbl, ælfrd k costume, Doctor Octopus, Hulk kastjum, daktr aktps, hlk Gotham, Magneto, Rogue am, mænio, ro f fortress, Alpha Flight, tough fortrs, ælf flajt, tf v villain, Professor Xavier, Batcave vln, prfsr zevir, bækev threat, Lex Luthor, stealth rt, lks lur, stl The Hulk, weather, scythe hlk, wr, saj s Superman, lasso, spandex suprmæn, læso, spændks z zonk, laser, disguise zak, lezr, dskajz ( š ) Shadowcat, radiation, Flash ædokæt, redien, flæ ( ž ) treasure, Mirage trr, mra h Hulk, superhero hlk, suprhiro t ( č ) champion, Watchmen, launch tæmpiyn, watmn, lnt d ( ǰ ) justice, origin, judge dsts, rdn, dd m Magneto, Aquaman, crime mænio, akwmæn, krajm n Nightcrawler, spandex, Robin najkralr, spændks, rabn super strength, Batarang supr strk, bæræ l Lois Lane, Alfred, Smallville lows len, ælfrd, smalvl r Rogue, Alfred, Nightcrawler ro, ælfrd, najkralr w Wonder Woman, Nightwing wndr wmn, najtw j ( y ) united, slayer junajd, slejr uh-oh, Batman o, bæmæn Magneto mænio Weird Consonants to Notice Glottal Stop: Voiceless stop that’s rare in English. It may almost seem like a short pause instead of a sound. “uh-oh” is the best example, but it can also replace “t” in certain words (like “mitten”) in some dialects. Lateral Flap: A quick flap of the tongue. Comes out sort of like a cross between a “t” and “d” sound, as in “butter”. j Palatal Glide: Be careful with word-medial [j]. Compare “layer” [lejr] with “lair” [ler]. 5 Phonetic Alphabet Chart: Vowels of English IPA Symbol Example (Standard Orthography) Example (IPA) i superhero suprhiro invisibility nvzbli e cape kep incredible nkrdbl æ Batman bæmæn Buffy bfi ability bli a Robin rabn u Superman suprmæn Doctor Octopus daktr aktps o Rogue ro law l aj ( a ) kryptonite krptnajt aw ( a ) powers pawrz j ( ) Superboy suprbj Weird Vowels to Notice aj, aw, j Diphthongs: Although written with two symbols, these count as one sound. Schwa: Always unstressed. Usually comes out sounding like [] as in “cut”. Found in longer words when another vowel is stressed. Low Back Round Vowel: Not everyone has this sound in their dialect. Do you have a difference between “caught” and “cot”? If so, then “caught” would be [kt]. If not, they are both [kat]. 6 IPA Transcription Exercises I. Consonants 1. Write the IPA symbol for the first sound in these words: sniffles ___ bronchitis ___ cold ___ pneumonia ___ flu ___ death ___ 2. Write the IPA symbol for the last sound in these words: rash ___ concussion ___ lacerations ___ hemorrhage ___ fracture ___ death ___ 3. Write the IPA symbol for the highlighted sound in these words: alcoholism ___ hemophilia ___ diabetes ___ cancer ___ hypothyroidism ___ chronic death... syndrome___ II. Vowels 1. Write the IPA symbol for the first sound in these words (just the first sound of the first word is fine if it’s a phrase): obesity ___ amnesia ___ epilepsy ___ aphasia ___ autism ___ attention deficit disorder___ 2. Write the IPA symbol for the last sound in these words (just the last sound of the last word is fine if it’s a phrase): dystrophy ___ sciatica ___ polio ___ punched in the jaw ___ 3. Write the IPA symbol for the highlighted sound in these words: borderline ___ schizoid ___ bipolar ___ paranoid ___ obsessive compulsive ___ antisocial ___ III. From Orthography to IPA 1. Write the following words in IPA: chlamydia _______________________ gonorrhea _______________________ hepatitis _______________________ syphilis _______________________ 1a. Alternate exercises for people who find STDs discomforting: fluffy bunnies________________________ sunshiney rainbows___________________ pretty unicorns_______________________ grim death and despair_________________ 7 2. Transcribe the following into IPA: Do no harm. Off with your shirt, let's have a look. A few days with a cooperative test subject could be worth months of theoretical research. IV. From IPA to Orthography 1. Write each word in standard English orthography. pl __________________ tot __________________ pil __________________ tt __________________ pul __________________ tat __________________ pl __________________ tut __________________ pel __________________ 2. Write each sentence in standard English orthography. aj kænt bliv ju at mi dz æt hæv ni lmnz n t? aj hæv strs ælrdi maj hajpolajsimi z nat mædnd. aj wz dstktli tld æt aj hæd bld r prablm V. Going Beyond 1. If you know another language, what (if any) sounds in that language cannot be represented using the symbols you now know? 2. Here’s a passage from another dialect of English.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grapheme-To-Lexeme Feedback in the Spelling System: Evidence from a Dysgraphic Patient
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 23 (2), 278–307 Grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the spelling system: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient Michael McCloskey Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA Paul Macaruso Community College of Rhode Island, Warwick, and Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, USA Brenda Rapp Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA This article presents an argument for grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the cognitive spelling system, based on the impaired spelling performance of dysgraphic patient CM. The argument relates two features of CM’s spelling. First, letters from prior spelling responses intrude into sub- sequent responses at rates far greater than expected by chance. This letter persistence effect arises at a level of abstract grapheme representations, and apparently results from abnormal persistence of activation. Second, CM makes many formal lexical errors (e.g., carpet ! compute). Analyses revealed that a large proportion of these errors are “true” lexical errors originating in lexical selec- tion, rather than “chance” lexical errors that happen by chance to take the form of words. Additional analyses demonstrated that CM’s true lexical errors exhibit the letter persistence effect. We argue that this finding can be understood only within a functional architecture in which activation from the grapheme level feeds back to the lexeme level, thereby influencing lexical selection. INTRODUCTION a brain-damaged patient with an acquired spelling deficit, arguing from his error pattern that Like other forms of language processing, written the cognitive system for written word produc- word production implicates multiple levels of tion includes feedback connections from gra- representation, including semantic, orthographic pheme representations to orthographic lexeme lexeme, grapheme, and allograph levels.
    [Show full text]
  • ON SOME CATEGORIES for DESCRIBING the SEMOLEXEMIC STRUCTURE by Yoshihiko Ikegami
    ON SOME CATEGORIES FOR DESCRIBING THE SEMOLEXEMIC STRUCTURE by Yoshihiko Ikegami 1. A lexeme is the minimum unit that carries meaning. Thus a lexeme can be a "word" as well as an affix (i.e., something smaller than a word) or an idiom (i.e,, something larger than a word). 2. A sememe is a unit of meaning that can be realized as a single lexeme. It is defined as a structure constituted by those features having distinctive functions (i.e., serving to distinguish the sememe in question from other semernes that contrast with it).' A question that arises at this point is whether or not one lexeme always corresponds to just one serneme and no more. Three theoretical positions are foreseeable: (I) one which holds that one lexeme always corresponds to just one sememe and no more, (2) one which holds that one lexeme corresponds to an indefinitely large number of sememes, and (3) one which holds that one lexeme corresponds to a certain limited number of sememes. These three positions wiIl be referred to as (1) the "Grundbedeutung" theory, (2) the "use" theory, and (3) the "polysemy" theory, respectively. The Grundbedeutung theory, however attractive in itself, is to be rejected as unrealistic. Suppose a preliminary analysis has revealed that a lexeme seems to be used sometimes in an "abstract" sense and sometimes in a "concrete" sense. In order to posit a Grundbedeutung under such circumstances, it is to be assumed that there is a still higher level at which "abstract" and "concrete" are neutralized-this is certainly a theoretical possibility, but it seems highly unlikely and unrealistic from a psychological point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic
    Linguistics and Literature Studies 2(7): 185-189, 2014 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/lls.2014.020702 A Brief Description of Consonants in Modern Standard Arabic Iram Sabir*, Nora Alsaeed Al-Jouf University, Sakaka, KSA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved. Abstract The present study deals with “A brief Modern Standard Arabic. This study starts from an description of consonants in Modern Standard Arabic”. This elucidation of the phonetic bases of sounds classification. At study tries to give some information about the production of this point shows the first limit of the study that is basically Arabic sounds, the classification and description of phonetic rather than phonological description of sounds. consonants in Standard Arabic, then the definition of the This attempt of classification is followed by lists of the word consonant. In the present study we also investigate the consonant sounds in Standard Arabic with a key word for place of articulation in Arabic consonants we describe each consonant. The criteria of description are place and sounds according to: bilabial, labio-dental, alveolar, palatal, manner of articulation and voicing. The attempt of velar, uvular, and glottal. Then the manner of articulation, description has been made to lead to the drawing of some the characteristics such as phonation, nasal, curved, and trill. fundamental conclusion at the end of the paper. The aim of this study is to investigate consonant in MSA taking into consideration that all 28 consonants of Arabic alphabets. As a language Arabic is one of the most 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonological Processes
    Phonological Processes Phonological processes are patterns of articulation that are developmentally appropriate in children learning to speak up until the ages listed below. PHONOLOGICAL PROCESS DESCRIPTION AGE ACQUIRED Initial Consonant Deletion Omitting first consonant (hat → at) Consonant Cluster Deletion Omitting both consonants of a consonant cluster (stop → op) 2 yrs. Reduplication Repeating syllables (water → wawa) Final Consonant Deletion Omitting a singleton consonant at the end of a word (nose → no) Unstressed Syllable Deletion Omitting a weak syllable (banana → nana) 3 yrs. Affrication Substituting an affricate for a nonaffricate (sheep → cheep) Stopping /f/ Substituting a stop for /f/ (fish → tish) Assimilation Changing a phoneme so it takes on a characteristic of another sound (bed → beb, yellow → lellow) 3 - 4 yrs. Velar Fronting Substituting a front sound for a back sound (cat → tat, gum → dum) Backing Substituting a back sound for a front sound (tap → cap) 4 - 5 yrs. Deaffrication Substituting an affricate with a continuant or stop (chip → sip) 4 yrs. Consonant Cluster Reduction (without /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (grape → gape) Depalatalization of Final Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the end of a word (dish → dit) 4 - 6 yrs. Stopping of /s/ Substituting a stop sound for /s/ (sap → tap) 3 ½ - 5 yrs. Depalatalization of Initial Singles Substituting a nonpalatal for a palatal sound at the beginning of a word (shy → ty) Consonant Cluster Reduction (with /s/) Omitting one or more consonants in a sequence of consonants (step → tep) Alveolarization Substituting an alveolar for a nonalveolar sound (chew → too) 5 yrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Phonological Rules
    14 February 2013 Aaron J. Dinkin Linguistics 1 [email protected] Lecture 8 Phonology: finding phonological rules Given a data from a language, how do you identify phonological rules? —how do you determine if two sounds are allophones of the same phoneme, and/or what rule determines the relationship between the allophones? Basic process: 1) Look at the environments in which the sounds appear 2) Look for natural classes in the environments, and 3) Determine if the sounds are in complementary distribution 4) If so, find which sound occurs in the elsewhere condition if any 5) State a rule which accounts for the distribution you see Example: Consider a dialect of English with two allophones of /aI/, [aI] and [ʌI]. What rule accounts for their distribution? Words containing [aI] Words containing [ʌI] tribe hype dive white rise life oblige bike mime ice fine fly First, we just list the environments in which [aI] and [ʌI] appear in the data: [aI] [ʌI] ɹ__b h__p d__v w__t ɹ__z l__f l__dʒ b__k m__m #__s f__n l__# Next, we look for natural classes among the environments: [ʌI] is always followed by a voiceless consonant. Do we have complementary distribution? Yes: ; [aI] is never pre-voiceless. [aI] is followed by both voiced consonants and the word boundary: not a natural class. Thus [aI] occurs “elsewhere”; it’s the underlying form. So we write the rule: /aI/ becomes [ʌI] before voiceless sounds aɪ ʌɪ / __[–vce] Example: Tojolabal uses both ejective [k’] and regular [k]. Are they allophones of the same phoneme, or distinct phonemes? Sample
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies 1
    Universita’ degli Studi di Firenze Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature e Studi Interculturali Biblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna: Collana, Riviste e Laboratorio Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies 1 Editor M. Rita Manzini firenze university press 2015 Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali / Working Papers in Linguistics and Oriental Studies - n. 1, 2015 ISSN 2421-7220 ISBN 978-88-6655-832-3 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/QULSO-2421-7220-1 Direttore Responsabile: Beatrice Töttössy CC 2015 Firenze University Press La rivista è pubblicata on-line ad accesso aperto al seguente indirizzo: www.fupress.com/bsfm-qulso The products of the Publishing Committee of Biblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna: Collana, Riviste e Laboratorio (<http://www.lilsi.unifi.it/vp-82-laboratorio-editoriale-open-access-ricerca- formazione-e-produzione.html>) are published with financial support from the Department of Languages, Literatures and Intercultural Studies of the University of Florence, and in accordance with the agreement, dated February 10th 2009 (updated February 19th 2015), between the De- partment, the Open Access Publishing Workshop and Firenze University Press. The Workshop promotes the development of OA publishing and its application in teaching and career advice for undergraduates, graduates, and PhD students in the area of foreign languages and litera- tures, and of social studies, as well as providing training and planning services. The Workshop’s publishing team are responsible for the editorial workflow of all the volumes and journals pub- lished in the Biblioteca di Studi di Filologia Moderna series. QULSO employs the double-blind peer review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetics in Phonology” in This SICOL).1
    Emergent Stops John J. Ohala University of California, Berkeley Two of the most fundamental distinctions between classes of speech sounds is that between sonorants and obstruents and between continuants and non-continuants. Sonorants are characterized as sounds which have no constriction small enough to impede the flow of air to the point of creating any audible turbulence; obstruents, as sounds which have a constriction which does impede the flow of air to the point of creating turbulence a stop burst. Continuants are sounds which could be extended indefinitely whereas non-continuants involve a momentary and abrupt attenuation of the speech signal amplitude. This being the case, it is a rather remarkable phonological event when a stop, which is an non-continuant obstruent, appears as it were, “out of nowhere” surrounded by speech sounds which are either sonorants and/or continuants. Typically these are referred to in the phonological literature as ‘epenthetic’ or ‘intrusive’ stops, terms which reflect the belief that they were introduced by some external cause. Some examples are given in (1) (for references, see Ohala 1995, in press). (1) Engl. youngster [»j√Nkst‘] < j√N + st‘ Engl. warmth [wç”mpT] < warm + T Engl. Thompson < Thom + son (proper name) Engl. dempster ‘judge’ < deem + ster Sotho vontSa ‘to show’ < *voniSa (causative of ‘to see’) Cl. Greek andros < ane# ros ‘man’ French chambre < Latin kame(ra 'room' Spanish alhambra < Arabic al hamra ‘the red’ Latin templum < *tem - lo ‘a section’ A common explanation for these stops is to characterize them as ways to make the transition easier between the flanking sounds or to “repair” ill-formed phonotactics (Piggot and Singh 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Introduction to The
    PREVIEW OF THE IPA HANDBOOK Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet PARTI Introduction to the IPA 1. What is the International Phonetic Alphabet? The aim of the International Phonetic Association is to promote the scientific study of phonetics and the various practical applications of that science. For both these it is necessary to have a consistent way of representing the sounds of language in written form. From its foundation in 1886 the Association has been concerned to develop a system of notation which would be convenient to use, but comprehensive enough to cope with the wide variety of sounds found in the languages of the world; and to encourage the use of thjs notation as widely as possible among those concerned with language. The system is generally known as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Both the Association and its Alphabet are widely referred to by the abbreviation IPA, but here 'IPA' will be used only for the Alphabet. The IPA is based on the Roman alphabet, which has the advantage of being widely familiar, but also includes letters and additional symbols from a variety of other sources. These additions are necessary because the variety of sounds in languages is much greater than the number of letters in the Roman alphabet. The use of sequences of phonetic symbols to represent speech is known as transcription. The IPA can be used for many different purposes. For instance, it can be used as a way to show pronunciation in a dictionary, to record a language in linguistic fieldwork, to form the basis of a writing system for a language, or to annotate acoustic and other displays in the analysis of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of the Treatment of Developmental Language
    brain sciences Review Efficacy of the Treatment of Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic Review Sara Rinaldi 1,2,* , Maria Cristina Caselli 3, Valentina Cofelice 4, Simonetta D’Amico 5,6,†, Anna Giulia De Cagno 2, Giuseppina Della Corte 7, Maria Valeria Di Martino 8, Brigida Di Costanzo 9,10, Maria Chiara Levorato 6,11,†, Roberta Penge 12, Tiziana Rossetto 2, Alessandra Sansavini 6,13,† , Simona Vecchi 14 and Pierluigi Zoccolotti 15,16 1 Developmental Neurorehabilitation Service, UOC Infancy, Adolescence, Family Counseling, AULSS 6 Euganea—Padua Bacchiglione District, Via Dei Colli 4/6, 35143 Padua, Italy 2 Federazione Logopedisti Italiani, Via Daniello Bartoli, 00152 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (A.G.D.C.); [email protected] (T.R.) 3 Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, 00185 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 “Iuvenia” Rehabilitation Centre, C.da Piana, 86026 Morcone, Italy; [email protected] 5 Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, P.le S. Tommasi, 1, 67100 Coppito, Italy; [email protected] 6 CLASTA—Communication & Language Acquisition Studies in Typical & Atypical Population, Piazza Epiro 12D, 00183 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (M.C.L.); [email protected] (A.S.) 7 Centro Panda, Via Antonio Gramsci, 38, 80022 Arzano, Italy; [email protected] 8 Health Professions Integrated Service, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli di Napoli, 80131 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 9 Division
    [Show full text]
  • Learning [Voice]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Fall 2010 Learning [Voice] Joshua Ian Tauberer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the First and Second Language Acquisition Commons Recommended Citation Tauberer, Joshua Ian, "Learning [Voice]" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 288. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 Please see my home page, http://razor.occams.info, for the data files and scripts that make this reproducible research. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/288 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Learning [Voice] Abstract The [voice] distinction between homorganic stops and fricatives is made by a number of acoustic correlates including voicing, segment duration, and preceding vowel duration. The present work looks at [voice] from a number of multidimensional perspectives. This dissertation's focus is a corpus study of the phonetic realization of [voice] in two English-learning infants aged 1;1--3;5. While preceding vowel duration has been studied before in infants, the other correlates of post-vocalic voicing investigated here --- preceding F1, consonant duration, and closure voicing intensity --- had not been measured before in infant speech. The study makes empirical contributions regarding the development of the production of [voice] in infants, not just from a surface- level perspective but also with implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in the adult and developing linguistic systems. Additionally, several methodological contributions will be made in the use of large sized corpora and data modeling techniques. The study revealed that even in infants, F1 at the midpoint of a vowel preceding a voiced consonant was lower by roughly 50 Hz compared to a vowel before a voiceless consonant, which is in line with the effect found in adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual and Acoustic Analysis of Lexical Stress in Greek Speakers with Dysarthria
    Perceptual and acoustic analysis of lexical stress in Greek speakers with dysarthria Ioannis Papakyritsis and Nicole Müller Linköping University Post Print N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication: Ioannis Papakyritsis and Nicole Müller, Perceptual and acoustic analysis of lexical stress in Greek speakers with dysarthria, 2014, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, (28), 7-8, 555-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2014.926993 Copyright: Informa Healthcare http://informahealthcare.com/ Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109597 Perceptual and acoustic analysis of lexical stress in Greek speakers with dysarthria Ioannis Papakyritsis1 and Nicole Müller2 1Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL, USA 2 Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (Received 4 February 2014, accepted 25 April 2014) Address for Correspondence: Dr. Ioannis Papakyritsis Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders Western Illinois University 240 Memorial Hall, 1 University Circle Macomb, IL 61455 [email protected] Abstract The study reported in this paper investigated the abilities of Greek speakers with dysarthria to signal lexical stress at the single word level. Three speakers with dysarthria and two unimpaired control participants were recorded completing a repetition task of a list of words consisting of minimal pairs of Greek disyllabic words contrasted by lexical stress location only. Fourteen listeners were asked to determine the attempted stress location for each word pair. Acoustic analyses of duration and intensity ratios, both within and across words, were undertaken to identify possible acoustic correlates of the listeners’ judgments concerning stress location. Acoustic and perceptual data indicate that while each participant with dysarthria in this study had some difficulty in signaling stress unambiguously, the pattern of difficulty was different for each speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in English /L
    The University of Manchester Research Variation in English /l/ Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Turton, D. (2014). Variation in English /l/: synchronic reections of the life cycle of phonological processes. University of Manchester. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:08. Oct. 2021 Variation in English /l/: Synchronic reections of the life cycle of phonological processes A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2014 Danielle Turton School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents List of Figures 7 List of Tables 11 Abstract 15 Declaration 16 Copyright 17 Acknowledgements 18 1 Introduction 20 1.1 Goals of the thesis . 21 1.1.1 Theoretical issues . 21 1.1.2 Empirical issues . 22 1.1.3 Peripheral goals .
    [Show full text]