Special Report the Future of Pilot Training

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Report the Future of Pilot Training Special Report The Future of Pilot Training FlightSafety International’s new Operational Day Flow training system lets pilots learn the aircraft’s systems by practicing simulated flights with realistic failures and distractions instead of rote memorization. ON THE FLY The Future of Pilot Training FAA Views Stall Training As Critical Part of Pilot Education by Matt Thurber The flight in the Citation started out the new protocol, which emphasizes initial training or their training for pilot normally enough. A takeoff followed reducing angle of attack as the primary certificates. Rather, “it is important to by steep turns, slow flight, stall recog- means of stall recovery. This protocol reinforce this basic training throughout nition and recovery, then descend and is in marked contrast to the FAA’s ear- their careers.” It’s also important that level off before reaching the final ap- lier advice, which was to try not to lose some pilots “may need to unlearn pre- proach fix. Everything was going well, altitude and to use power to recover vious stall recovery procedures based at least from my viewpoint in the copi- from a stall event. on their prior experience.” In any case, lot’s chair. The air was smooth as silk, The FAA doesn’t identify the ac- the FAA added, stall training should be and my captain’s touch on the controls cidents on which it based the changes either standalone or part of other train- rock steady, although at this point we in AC 120-109, but it’s clear that the ing areas, and approach-to-stall and stick were back on autopilot. agency was galvanized into action by pusher (if applicable) training should be Suddenly, the control column vi- the Colgan Air Flight 3407 Q400 ac- part of initial, transition, requalification, brated rapidly. Stick-shaker! That cident near Buffalo, N.Y., on Feb. 12, differences, conversion, upgrade and re- means stall! Realizing the mistake, 2009, and the loss of the A330 op- current training. my captain simultaneously clicked erating Air France Flight 447 in the The FAA notes that full-motion flight off the autopilot and pushed the nose Atlantic Ocean on June 1, 2009. Both simulators can be used for approach-to-stall forward to unload the wings and then involved stalls, although the circum- training, but instructors and pilots must be added power. The unobservant copi- stances were not similar. In any familiar with the limitations of the simula- lot (that was me) had failed to notice case, according to the FAA, “A the loss of airspeed after we leveled growing causal factor in LOC U.S. Department off and I also neglected to let my dis- [loss-of-control] accidents is the of Transportation Advisory Federal Aviation tracted captain know that we needed pilot’s inappropriate reaction to Administration Circular Subject: Stall and Stick Pusher Training to add power. the first indication of a stall or Date: 8/6/12 AC No: 120-109 Initiated by: AFS-200 Change: Luckily, this flight was not in a stick pusher event.” Another The information contained in this advisory circular (AC) was developed based on a review of recommended practices developed by major airp real airplane but in a FlightSafety stall-related accident, in which carriers, training organizations, simulator lane manufacturers, labor organizations, air organizations. This AC does not provide guidamanufacturers, and industry representative Citation simulator, and I learned an the pilots failed to add power industry and government stakeholders are now nce for full aerodynamic stall training, which revised to include that guidance. developing. Once developed, this AC will be excellent lesson about what I should after leveling off during an ap- The goal of this AC is to provide best practic for pilots, within existing regulations, to ensurees and guidance for training, testing, and checking be watching when flying as copi- proach, was the Circuit City stall warnings and stick pusher correct and consistent responses to unexpected activations. This AC emphasizes (AOA) at the first indication of a reducing the angle of attack stall as the primary means of appr lot and also how to apply the FAA’s Citation 560 crash in Pueblo, Additionally, this AC provides guidance for operators and training oach-to-stall or stall recovery. new recommendations on stall train- Colo., on Feb. 16, 2005. stall and stick pusher event training. centers in the development of Core principals of this AC include: ing. That advice comes in the form of • Reduction of AOA is the most important respon Advisory Circular 120-109 “Stall and Reinforcement of Basic • Evaluation criteria for a recovery from a sta se when confronted with a stall event. predetermined value for altitude loss and s ll or approach-to-stall that does not mandate a internal variables which aff hould consider the multitude of external and Stick Pusher Training,” a comprehen- Training Needed ect the recovery altitude. (Reference: Safety Alerts for Operators (SAFO) 10012, Possible Misinterpretation of the sive resource that came out just before The FAA emphasized in the (PTS) Language “Minimal Loss of Altitude”). Practical Test Standards • Realistic scenarios that could be encountered in operational cond my training session. The FlightSafety AC that stall training should not encountered with the autopilot engaged. itions including stalls • Pilot training which emphasizes treating an “appr and execute the stall recovery at oach-to-stall” the same as a “full stall,” folks didn’t waste any time adopting be considered just a part of pilots’ the first indication of a stall. • Incorporation of stick pusher training into flight training scenarios, if installed on the aircraft. /s/ for John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards Service XX I BJT april_may 2014 I bjtonline.com ON THE FLY The Future of Pilot Training tor “to mitigate negative training.” The so on). At high altitudes, stall recovery to permit the reduction in AOA even at skills covered by the curriculum should may require thousands of feet.” low altitudes.” include takeoff or maneuvering, clean In the Colgan Air Flight 3407 The concept of “startle” is also and landing configuration approach-to- accident, after the stick shaker acti- a factor in many incidents and ac- stalls; scenarios that include level flight vated and the autopilot disconnected, cidents, according to the FAA. “Al- with bank angles of 25 to 30 degrees, the captain reacted with “startle and though it may be difficult to create the manual and autopilot control, visual confusion,” according to the NTSB. physiological response of startle in and instrument flight conditions, Even though the pusher activated the training environment, if achieved, high and low altitudes and various three times, the captain pulled back startle events may provide a powerful weight-and-balance conditions. on the yoke and raised the nose to 19 lesson for the crew. The goal of us- Also important are emphasis degrees nose-up pitch, resulting in ing startle in training is to provide the items that cover such subjects as the loss of control. crew with a startle experience that al- “abrupt pitch up and trim change The FAA wants pilots who fly air- lows for the effective recovery of the commonly associated when the auto- planes equipped with stick pushers to airplane. Considerable care should be pilot unexpectedly disconnects dur- undergo academic training and flight used in startle training to avoid nega- ing a stall event. This dramatic pitch training in a full-flight simulator. “It tive learning.” and trim change typically repres- is important for pilots to experience “The FAA is making a serious ents an unexpected physical chal- the sudden forward movement of the push these days for different types of lenge to the pilot when trying to control wheel during a stick-pusher stall recoveries as they relate to re- reduce AOA [angle of attack]. In activation. From observations, most cent accidents,” said Richard Sears, some airplanes, this may be exac- instructors state that, regardless of founder of Carlsbad, Calif.-based erbated by an additional pitch up previous academic training, pilots (on Citation training provider Loft. The when the pilot increases thrust dur- their first encounter with a stick push- company offers training in both a ing stall recovery.” er) usually resist the stick pusher and full-motion simulator and Citations, Another critical emphasis item is immediately pull back on the control as well as upset recovery and stall fundamental to the whole issue of stall wheel rather than releasing pressure training in an Aero Vodochody L-39. training: “Reducing AOA is the prop- as they have been taught. Therefore, Among other things, the L-39 is used er way to recover from a stall event. pilots should receive practical stick is to teach students how to deal with Pilots must accept that reducing the pusher training in a FFS to develop the the startle factor that results when the au- airplane’s AOA may often result in proper response (allowing the pusher topilot suddenly shuts off during a stall. altitude loss. The amount of altitude to reduce AOA) when confronted with “What we’ve done is to incorporate real- loss will be affected by the airplane’s a stick-pusher activation. Stick-pusher life events,” he said. “I think the FAA and operational environment (entry alti- training should be completed as a dem- training companies are understanding the tude, airplane weight, density altitude, onstration/practice exercise, including need for real-world [training], and we’re bank angle, airplane configuration and repetitions, until the pilot’s reaction is in agreement with that. n XX I BJT april_may 2014 I bjtonline.com ON THE FLY The Future of Pilot Training Training for a lifetime of safe piloting by Matt Thurber Recurrent training–and the way At last year’s NBAA Convention, Recurrent Training it is delivered–could hold the key the Safety Committee released a doc- Because the SMS helps identify to improving training for busi- ument that summarizes the problems threats, it is ideally suited to help ness aviation pilots, according to with business aviation pilot training operators discover areas where train- the NBAA Training Advisory Com- and offers solutions.
Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Regulamento (Ue) N
    11.2.2012 PT Jornal Oficial da União Europeia L 39/1 II (Atos não legislativos) REGULAMENTOS o REGULAMENTO (UE) N. 100/2012 DA COMISSÃO de 3 de fevereiro de 2012 o que altera o Regulamento (CE) n. 748/2009, relativo à lista de operadores de aeronaves que realizaram uma das atividades de aviação enumeradas no anexo I da Diretiva 2003/87/CE em ou após 1 de janeiro de 2006, inclusive, com indicação do Estado-Membro responsável em relação a cada operador de aeronave, tendo igualmente em conta a expansão do regime de comércio de licenças de emissão da União aos países EEE-EFTA (Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE) A COMISSÃO EUROPEIA, 2003/87/CE e é independente da inclusão na lista de operadores de aeronaves estabelecida pela Comissão por o o força do artigo 18. -A, n. 3, da diretiva. Tendo em conta o Tratado sobre o Funcionamento da União Europeia, (5) A Diretiva 2008/101/CE foi incorporada no Acordo so­ bre o Espaço Económico Europeu pela Decisão o Tendo em conta a Diretiva 2003/87/CE do Parlamento Europeu n. 6/2011 do Comité Misto do EEE, de 1 de abril de e do Conselho, de 13 de Outubro de 2003, relativa à criação de 2011, que altera o anexo XX (Ambiente) do Acordo um regime de comércio de licenças de emissão de gases com EEE ( 4). efeito de estufa na Comunidade e que altera a Diretiva 96/61/CE o o do Conselho ( 1), nomeadamente o artigo 18. -A, n. 3, alínea a), (6) A extensão das disposições do regime de comércio de licenças de emissão da União, no setor da aviação, aos Considerando o seguinte: países EEE-EFTA implica que os critérios fixados nos o o termos do artigo 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-In Am Bahnhof Und Fly Rail Baggage
    1/8 Check-in am Bahnhof via Zürich und Genève Check-in à la gare via Zürich et Genève Check-in alla stazione via Zürich e Genève Check-in at the railstation via Zürich and Genève Version: 26. Januar 2011 Legend HA = Handlingagent SP = Swissport, DN = Dnata Switzerland AG, AS = Airline Assistance Switzerland AG, EH = Own Handling R = Reason T = Technical, S = Security, O = Other reason WT = Weight Tolerance Y = Economy-Class, C = Business-Class, F = First-Class * = Agent Informations Infoportal/Airlines Check-in ok Restrictions Airline, Code Check-in Einschränkungen/Restrictions WT HA R Y = 2 Adria Airways JP ok SP C = 3 Aegean Airlines A3 ok 2 SP Aer Lingus EI no SP O Aeroflot Russian Airlines SU no SP S Aerolineas Argentinas AR ok 2 SP African Safari Airways ASA ok 2 DN Afriqiyah Airways 8U no DN O Air Algérie* AH ok No boardingpass 0 SP Air Baltic BT no SP T Not for USA, Canada, Pristina, Russia, Air Berlin* AB ok Cyprus; 0 DN not possible for groups 11+ Air Cairo MSC ok 2 SP AC 6821 / 6822 / 6826 / 6829 / 6832 / Air Canada AC no SP T =ok Air Dolomiti EN ok 2 SP Air Europa AEA / UX ok 2 DN Not from Zürich; not for USA, Canada, AF ok* 2 SP T Air France* Mexico; no boardingpass Air India AI ok 2 SP Air Italy I9 ok 2 DN Air Mali XG no SP O Air Malta KM ok 3 SP Y = 7 Air Mauritius MK ok Not from Zurich SP C = 10 Air Mediteranée BIE ok 2 DN Air New Zealand NZ ok 2 SP Air One AP ok 2 SP Air Seychelles HM ok Not from Zurich 3 SP Air Transat TS ok 2 SP Alitalia AZ no SP/DN T American Airlines AA no SP T ANA All Nippon Airways NH ok 2 SP Armavia
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order 7340.2A Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.2A CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2A, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. July 29, 2010. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Changes, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. Y[fa\.Uj-Koef p^/2, Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: k/^///V/<+///0 Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 7/29/10 JO 7340.2A CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 4/8/10 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 7/29/10 1−1−1 . 8/27/09 1−1−1 . 7/29/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 4/8/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 7/29/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−23 .
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Compliance List of Aircraft Operators Specifying the Administering Member State for Each Aircraft Operator – June 2014
    Prior compliance list of aircraft operators specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator – June 2014 Inclusion in the prior compliance list allows aircraft operators to know which Member State will most likely be attributed to them as their administering Member State so they can get in contact with the competent authority of that Member State to discuss the requirements and the next steps. Due to a number of reasons, and especially because a number of aircraft operators use services of management companies, some of those operators have not been identified in the latest update of the EEA- wide list of aircraft operators adopted on 5 February 2014. The present version of the prior compliance list includes those aircraft operators, which have submitted their fleet lists between December 2013 and January 2014. BELGIUM CRCO Identification no. Operator Name State of the Operator 31102 ACT AIRLINES TURKEY 7649 AIRBORNE EXPRESS UNITED STATES 33612 ALLIED AIR LIMITED NIGERIA 29424 ASTRAL AVIATION LTD KENYA 31416 AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY TAJIKISTAN 30020 AVIASTAR-TU CO. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 40259 BRAVO CARGO UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 908 BRUSSELS AIRLINES BELGIUM 25996 CAIRO AVIATION EGYPT 4369 CAL CARGO AIRLINES ISRAEL 29517 CAPITAL AVTN SRVCS NETHERLANDS 39758 CHALLENGER AERO PHILIPPINES f11336 CORPORATE WINGS LLC UNITED STATES 32909 CRESAIR INC UNITED STATES 32432 EGYPTAIR CARGO EGYPT f12977 EXCELLENT INVESTMENT UNITED STATES LLC 32486 FAYARD ENTERPRISES UNITED STATES f11102 FedEx Express Corporate UNITED STATES Aviation 13457 Flying
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Office
    Official Journal L 139 of the European Union Volume 64 English edition Legislation 23 April 2021 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/662 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) . 1 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/663 of 22 April 2021 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlordecone in or on certain products (1) . 148 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/664 of 22 April 2021 on a regulatory framework for the U-space (1) . 161 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/665 of 22 April 2021 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for providers of air traffic management/air navigation services and other air traffic management network functions in the U-space airspace designated in controlled airspace (1) . 184 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/666 of 22 April 2021 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012 as regards requirements for manned aviation operating in U-space airspace (1) . 187 (1) Text with EEA relevance. Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period. EN The titles of all other acts are printed in bold type
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport: Quarterly Report No.17
    ATR launched upgraded versions of the ATR42 and 72, namely the -600 series with updated avionics among other changes. This is on the back of the buoyancy in the turboprop market seen over the last couple of years - represented above by ATR 42 500 series operated by Contact Air, a member of Lufhansa Regional. AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.17 4th QUARTER 2007 (October to December) 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................2 2. HIGHLIGHTS AND KEY DEVELOPMENTS.........................................................................3 2.1 REGULATORY.........................................................................................................................3 2.2 AIRLINES................................................................................................................................4 2.3 AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................12 2.4 SAFETY AND SECURITY ........................................................................................................15 2.5 ATM....................................................................................................................................16 2.6 MANUFACTURERS ................................................................................................................16 2.7 THE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • Antalya Airport 안탈리아 공항
    Antalya Airport 안탈리아 공항 코 드 : AYT / LTAI 도 시 : Antalya / 안탈리아 국 가 : Turkey / 터키 기준일: 2008.12.31 ◎ 개요 ▶ 주소 : Havalimani Basmudurlugu TR-07030 Antalya Turkey ▶ 전화 : +90 242-330 33 01, 330 33 04 ▶ 팩스 : +90 242-330 33 02 ▶ 홈페이지 : http://www.aytport.com/index.htm ▶ 이메일 : [email protected] ◎ 공항운영자 Gen Directorate of State Airports Administration (DHMI), Havalimani 공항운영주체 Basmudurlugu, Antalya Airport, 07030 Antalya 전화 +90 242-330 33 01, 330 33 04 팩스 +90 242-330 33 02 ◎ 시설현황 Rwy 18L/36R, 11,155' 3,400 m, width 148' 45 m, concrete, PCN 80 활주로 R/A/X/T. 추가활주로 Rwy 18R/36L, 9,809' 2,990 m, width 148' 45 m, asphalt 최대활주로길이 11,155' 3,400m Rwy 18L: HIRL, PAPI. Rwy 18R: HIRL, VASI. 활주로 등화 Rwy 36L: HIRL, calvert, VASI. Rwy 36R: HIRL, calvert, PAPI. ILS/DME (Brg 003º, LLZ ID I-AYT, 110.3 MHz, Ch 40, GS 3.0º); VOR/DME (Antalya, ID AYT, 114.0 MHz, Ch 87, N36º55.28' E030º47.82', 188º, 1.2 nm); TACAN (Antalya, ID AYT, Ch 102, N36º54.93' E030º46.97', at field); DME (Antalya, ID ANT, Ch 28, N36º52.53' 항행시설 E030º47.35', 001º, 1.6 nm); NDB (Antalya, ID YT, 302 kHz, N36º52.57' E030º47.35', 002º, 1.5 nm; Antalya, ID GEY, 413 kHz, N36º52.57' E030º27.31', 081º, 16.3 nm). Frequencies: Twr 126.1, 257.8 MHz; Gnd 121.9 MHz; App 122.05, 128.3, 362.3 MHz; ATIS 118.275 MHz. 주파수 See Navaids. 인근도시 Antalya (13 km).
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Profitability in the Airline Industry: a Comparison with Turkish Airlines
    Determinants of Profitability in the Airline Industry: A Comparison with Turkish Airlines Amirhassan Alahyari Submitted to the Institute of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Banking and Finance Eastern Mediterranean University August 2014 Gazimağusa, North Cyprus Approval of the Institute of Graduate Studies and Research Prof. Dr. Elvan Yılmaz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Banking and Finance. Prof. Dr. Salih Katırcıoğlu Chair, Department of Banking and Finance We certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Banking and Finance. Prof. Dr. Salih Katırcıoğlu Supervisor Examining Committee 1. Prof. Dr. Salih Katırcıoğlu 2. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Eralp Bektaş 3. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nesrin Özataç ABSTRACT In order to be competitive, the profitability of a firm plays an undeniable role. Therefore, investigation of the factors determining profitability of a firm would provide useful insights for firms in the process of decision making and strategic planning. The airline industry of Turkey has been known as a prominent sector because of its significant contribution to economic development and growth of employment over time. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to investigate the determinants of profitability for the Turkish airlines. Accordingly, a sample of major airlines is chosen and their data is extracted from Data Stream covering 1994 to 2013. Based on the panel data analysis, findings show that tangibility of assets, growth opportunities and liquidity ratios have significant impacts on the profitability of the firms.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA DOT/TSC CY1997 ACAIS Database Report Date : 12/18/97 Page : 1
    Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY1997 ACAIS Database Report Date : 12/18/97 Page : 1 CARGO CARRIER CODES LISTED BY CARRIER NAME CARCD Carrier Name CARCD ----- ------------------------------------------ ----- KHC 135 AIRWAYS, INC. KHC WRB 40-MILE AIR LTD. WRB ACD ACADEMY AIRLINES ACD AER ACE AIR CARGO EXPRESS, INC. AER VX ACES AIRLINES VX IQDA ADI DOMESTIC AIRLINES, INC. IQDA UALC ADVANCE LEASING COMPANY UALC ADV ADVANCED AIR CHARTER ADV ACI ADVANCED CHARTERS INT ACI YDVA ADVANTAGE AIR CHARTER, INC. YDVA EI AER LINGUS P.L.C. EI TPQ AERIAL TRANSIT COMPANY TPQ DGCA AERO CHARTER, INC. DGCA ML AERO COSTA RICA ML DJYA AERO EXPRESS, INC. DJYA AEF AERO FLIGHT SERVICE, INC. AEF GSHA AERO FREIGHT, INC. GSHA AGRP AERO GROUP AGRP CGYA AERO TAXI - ROCKFORD, INC. CGYA CLQ AERO TRANSCOLOMBIANA DE CARGA CLQ G3 AEROCHAGO AIRLINES, S.A. G3 EVQ AEROEJECUTIVO, C.A. EVQ XAES AEROFLIGHT EXECUTIVE SERVICES XAES SU AEROFLOT - RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES SU AR AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS AR LTN AEROLINEAS LATINAS, C.A. LTN ROM AEROMAR C. POR. A. ROM AM AEROMEXICO AM QO AEROMEXPRESS, S.A. DE C.V. QO ACQ AERONAUTICA DE CANCUN S.A. DE C.V. ACQ HUKA AERONAUTICAL SERVICES, INC. HUKA ADQ AERONAVES DEL PERU ADQ HJKA AEROPAK, INC. HJKA PL AEROPERU PL 6P AEROPUMA, S.A. 6P EAE AEROSERVICIOS ECUATORIANOS, C.A. EAE KRE AEROSUCRE, S.A. KRE ASQ AEROSUR ASQ MY AEROTRANSPORTES MAS DE CARGA, S.A. DE C.V. MY ZU AEROVAIS COLOMBIANAS LTD. (ARCA) ZU AV AEROVIAS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA, S. A. AV ZL AFFRETAIR LTD. (PRIVATE) ZL UCAL AGRO AIR ASSOCIATES UCAL RK AIR AFRIQUE RK CC AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC CC LU AIR ATLANTIC DOMINICANA LU AX AIR AURORA, INC.
    [Show full text]