DOCSLIB.ORG

Jon Altman Research Collection Part a MS 4721 Finding Aid Prepared by T Hansson, S Berry, C Oxley, C Biggs and C Zdanowicz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Finding aid prepared by T Hansson, S Berry, C Oxley, C Biggs and C Zdanowicz This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit August 07, 2017 Describing Archives: A Content Standard Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library April 2015 1 Lawson Crescent Acton Peninsula Acton Canberra, ACT, 2600 +61 2 6246 1111 [email protected] Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 4 Biographical note...........................................................................................................................................5 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 8 Arrangement note...........................................................................................................................................8 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................8 Related Materials ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Controlled Access Headings........................................................................................................................12 Spelling.........................................................................................................................................................13 Collection Inventory.................................................................................................................................... 15 Series 1 Research material [DATES: 1977-1990]................................................................................15 Series 2 Research Material [DATES: 1990-2010]............................................................................. 127 Series 3 CAEPR - Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research................................................302 Series 4 Miscellaneous........................................................................................................................ 328 Series 5 Publications............................................................................................................................355 Series 6 Reports, Studies and Theses..................................................................................................360 Series 7 Correspondence..................................................................................................................... 362 Series 8 Estrays....................................................................................................................................365 Series 9 Media..................................................................................................................................... 376 Series 10 Acts and Hansard................................................................................................................ 377 Series 11 JC Altman filing lists.......................................................................................................... 381 Series 12 Newly acquired material..................................................................................................... 381 Series 13 Northern Territory Emergency Response............................................................................382 Series 14 Research material 2005-2013..............................................................................................383 Series 15 Field Notebooks 1977-2010................................................................................................ 384 - Page 2 - Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Series 16 Field Diaries........................................................................................................................ 384 - Page 3 - Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Summary Information Repository Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Library Creator Altman, Jon C. Title Jon Altman research collection Part A Date [bulk] Bulk, 1977-2010 Date [inclusive] 1977-2014 Extent 44.0 Linear metres 249 archival boxes + 1 folio box + 44 folders in Manuscript Plan Cabinet. Language English Preferred Citation note Items from this collection should be cited as: [Title or description of manuscript item], Jon Altman research collection, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, MS 4721, Series [no.], Subseries [no.], Folder or Item [no.] - Page 4 - Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Biographical note Jon Altman was born in Haifa, Israel on 8 September 1954. Jon has dual Australian and New Zealand nationality. His partner since 1998 is Melinda Hinkson and he has two children, Tessa b. 1985 and Oskar b. 2007. Jon Altman was an undergraduate and graduate student at the University of Auckland, New Zealand for five years where he completed BA and MA (Hons) degrees. After a period of two years at the Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, he completed a PhD in Anthropology at the Australian National University, holding an Australian Postgraduate Award. For an eight year post-doctoral phase he held a series of research-only positions in the Department of Political and Social Change, Research School of Pacific Studies, before establishing CAEPR in 1990. Professor Altman undertook fieldwork for his doctorate in the Maningrida region, Western Arnhem Land in 1979–81 residing with Kuninjku people at Mumeka outstation on the Mann River and collaborating on research about local livelihood options. This research was published in the book Hunter-Gatherers Today: an Aboriginal Economy in North Australia (Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra, 1987). Professor Altman's research focuses on the anthropology of development and includes: Sustainable economic development and associated policy issues for Indigenous Australia; the hybrid economy framework; the economic articulations of Indigenous people with the Australian and global economies (especially in mining, tourism, the arts and emerging industries like carbon abatement); the Indigenous customary economy and its articulations with the market; land rights, native title and Indigenous land management; and theoretical issues in the anthropology of development. Professor Altman has regularly undertaken collaborative research with the Kuninjku [Kunwinjku] people on customary economy and wildlife harvesting, the arts, resource management, and on the transformations in the unusual regional hybrid economy made up of customary, state and market sectors. He has also undertaken field research in north Queensland, the Torres Strait, the Kimberley and Central Australia. In 1985 Jon Altman highlighted to the Miller Review of Aboriginal Employment and Training Programs, the urgent need to enhance Australias capacity to undertake economic research about Indigenous people. CAEPR (Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research) was established in 1990 at the Australian National University. Jon was appointed as Director of CAEPR in 1990. Over 20 years as Director, Jon’s role changed to include more staff and research management, university administration and outreach. Jon stepped down as Director in 2010 so he could devote more time to research and graduate training. CAEPR was integrated into the Research School of Social Sciences in the College of Arts and Social Sciences. He is currently (2015) a Research Professor at CAEPR dedicating his time to research on economic hybridity and Indigenous development in regional and remote Australia; and increasingly focusing on building on existing and new international scholarly links in critical social theory of development. Professor Altman has been involved in a number of ARC (Australian Research Council) projects including his own on 'Hybrid Economic Futures for Remote Indigenous Australia' and as a Chief - Page 5 - Jon Altman research collection Part A MS 4721 Investigator on an ARC Linkage project 'More than a Roof Overhead: Meeting the Need for a Sustainable Housing System in Remote Indigenous Communities', based at RMIT University. Other research he has undertaken focused on Indigenous interests in fresh water, as an adviser to the Indigenous Water Policy Group and the Northern Australia Indigenous Land and Sea Management Alliance (NAILSMA). A major project he directed, largely sponsored by the Sidney Myer Trust, is the 'People On Country, Healthy Landscapes, and Indigenous Economic Futures' project that began in November 2007. Jon was a consultant to the Australia Council on the Aboriginal Visual Arts industry and was Chairman of the Review in 1989. He continued to do research and write papers and submissions on the Indigenous Arts and Crafts sector, economic issues relating to Indigenous Arts and Crafts, and was also involved in the Indigenous Arts Strategy of the Northern Territory, writing 'An Indigenous Arts strategy for the Northern territory : recommended framework', in 2003. In 1990, Professor Altman also participated in evaluation and reviews of the CDEP (Community Development Employment Program) scheme and contributed to the CDEP Conference in 2000. Jon maintains a research and policy advisory network with
Recommended publications
  • Cornell International Affairs Review Editor-In-Chief Stephany Kim ’19

    Cornell International Affairs Review Editor-In-Chief Stephany Kim ’19

    1 Cornell International Affairs Review Editor-in-Chief Stephany Kim ’19 Managing Editor Ronni Mok ’20 Graduate Editors Amanda Cheney Caitlin Mastroe Martijn Mos Katharina Obermeier Whitney Taylor Youyi Zhang Undergraduate Editors Victoria Alandy ’20 Carmen Chan ’19 Christopher Cho ’17 Nidhi Dontula ’20 Gage DuBose ’18 Michelle Fung ’19 Matthew Gallanty ’18 Yuichiro Kakutani ’19 Beth Kelley ’19 Veronika Koziel ’19 Ethan Mandell ’18 Tola Mcyzkowska ’17 Ryan Norton ’17 Juliette Ovadia ’20 Srinand Paruthiyil ’19 Chasen Richards ’18 Xavier Salvador ’19 Julia Wang ’19 Yuijing Wang ’20 Design Editors Yuichiro Kakutani ’19 Yujing Wang ’20 Executive Board President Sohrab Nafisi ’18 Treasurer Ronni Mok ’20 VP of Programming Xavier Salvador ’19 Volume X Spring 2017 2 The Cornell International Affairs Review Board of Advisors Dr. Heike Michelsen, Primary Advisor Associate Director of Academic Programming, Einaudi Center for International Studies Professor Robert Andolina Johnson School of Management Professor Ross Brann Department of Near Eastern Studies Professor Matthew Evangelista Department of Government Professor Peter Katzenstein Department of Government Professor Isaac Kramnick Department of Government Professor David Lee Department of Applied Economics and Management Professor Elizabeth Sanders Department of Government Professor Nina Tannenwald Brown University Professor Nicolas van de Walle Department of Government Cornell International Affairs Review, an independent student organization located at Cornell University, produced and is responsible
  • Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission

    Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission

    Submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee into The Needs of Urban* Dwelling Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples By the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission October 2000 * Population centres of more than 1000 people and includes peoples living in or near country towns of this size. Contents Executive Summary 3 Involvement in Decision Making 11 Maintenance of Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights 20 Education, Training, Employment & Opportunities for 26 Economic Independence Indigenous Health Needs 40 Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Youth 52 Mainland Torres Strait Islander Issues 69 The Role of Other Agencies & Spheres of Government 75 ATSIC Programs & Services 110 Statistical Overview 189 Acronyms & Abbreviations 204 References & Bibliography 207 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The role of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission was established in 1990 to be the main Commonwealth agency in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander affairs. Our Act gives us a variety of functions including the responsibility to: • develop policy proposals to meet national, State, Territory and regional needs and priorities, • advise the Minister on legislation, and coordination of activities of other Commonwealth bodies, • protect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural material and information, and • formulate and implement programs. In exercising these responsibilities ATSIC has given Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders a stronger political voice. On the one hand, the most prominent Indigenous agency, ATSIC is often blamed for the fact that our people remain gravely disadvantaged. On the other hand it is not widely understood that ATSIC’s budget is meant to supplement the funding provided by the Government to other Commonwealth, State, Territory and Local Government agencies.
  • Phd. Thesis Understanding Indigenous

    Phd. Thesis Understanding Indigenous

    PhD. Thesis Understanding Indigenous Entrepreneurship: A Case Study Analysis. A paper presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland October 2004. Dennis Foley School of Business THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Accepted for the award of Supervisors: Dr. Maree Boyle Griffith university Dr. Judy Drennan Queensland university of Technology Dr. Jessica Kennedy university of central Queensland CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6 STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY 8 ACRONYMS 9 LIST OF FIGURES 10 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS/APPENDIX 11 ABSTRACT 12 1. INTRODUCTION 14 1.1 THE RESEARCH PROJECT 14 1.2 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN BUSINESSES 15 1.3 THE RESEARCH CONCEPTS 17 1.4 OUTLINE OF THE CHAPTERS: THE RESEARCH PROJECT. 19 2 INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIA & HAWAII 22 2.1 DEFINITION OF AN INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN AND INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 22 2.2 AN AUSTRALIAN CULTURAL CONSIDERATION 24 2.3 DEFINITION OF A NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND NATIVE HAWAIIAN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY 25 2.4 AN HAWAIIAN CULTURAL CONSIDERATION 27 2.5 WHO IS AN INDIGENOUS ENTREPRENEUR? 30 2.6 PRE-COLONIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP 34 2.7 CONCLUSION 37 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 40 3.1 INTRODUCTION 40 3.2 INDIGENOUS SMALL BUSINESS THEORY 41 3.3 ETHNIC THEORIES 42 3.3.1 CULTURAL THEORY 42 3.3.2 ETHNIC ENCLAVE THEORY 44 3.3.3 MIDDLEMEN MINORITY/RESPONSE TO CULTURAL ANTAGONISM THEORY 46 3.3.4 OPPORTUNITY/ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION THEORY 47 3.3.5 INTERACTIVE THEORIES 49 3.4 CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY OF ETHNIC SMALL BUSINESS THEORIES IN AUSTRALIA 50 3.5 SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY 50 3.6 CO-CULTURAL
  • Australian Curriculum: Science Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

    Australian Curriculum: Science Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

    Australian Curriculum: Science Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority Content elaborations and teacher background information for Years 7-10 JULY 2019 2 Content elaborations and teacher background information for Years 7-10 Australian Curriculum: Science Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority Table of contents Introduction 4 Teacher background information 24 for Years 7 to 10 Background 5 Year 7 teacher background information 26 Process for developing the elaborations 6 Year 8 teacher background information 86 How the elaborations strengthen 7 the Australian Curriculum: Science Year 9 teacher background information 121 The Australian Curriculum: Science 9 Year 10 teacher background information 166 content elaborations linked to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority Foundation 10 Year 1 11 Year 2 12 Year 3 13 Year 4 14 Year 5 15 Year 6 16 Year 7 17 Year 8 19 Year 9 20 Year 10 22 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority 3 Introduction This document showcases the 95 new content elaborations for the Australian Curriculum: Science (Foundation to Year 10) that address the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Histories and Cultures cross-curriculum priority. It also provides the accompanying teacher background information for each of the elaborations from Years 7 -10 to support secondary teachers in planning and teaching the science curriculum. The Australian Curriculum has a three-dimensional structure encompassing disciplinary knowledge, skills and understandings; general capabilities; and cross-curriculum priorities. It is designed to meet the needs of students by delivering a relevant, contemporary and engaging curriculum that builds on the educational goals of the Melbourne Declaration.
  • Of the Tasmanian Aborigines

    Of the Tasmanian Aborigines

    7. NOTES ON THE HUNTING STICKS (LUGHKANA), SPEARS (PERENNA), AND BASKETS (TUGH- BRAN A) OF THE TASMANIAN ABORIGINES. PL IX., X., XL. XII., XIII., XIV.. XV. By Fritz Noetling, M-A., Ph.D., Etc. (Read July 10th. 1911.) INTRODUCTION. In the pajJcrs previously published in the Society's journal I have conclusively proved, and it can now be con- si.Iered as an established fact, that the stone relics of the Aborigines represent implements only, and not weapons. This is a fact of the greatest importance, and its signifi- cance will only be fully realised when we apply it to the study of archaeolithic man in Europe- The Tasmanian Aborigines had made at least one great invention, viz.. they had discovered that a certain kind of rock yielded sharp- edged flakes when broken. (1). They also found that these sharp-edged flakes could be used for most of the re- quirements of their simple life. But here again we come upon one of those curious psychological pi'oblems that are so difiicult to explain. The Aborigines had undoubtedly discovered that these flakes were excellent cutting imple- ments, as thev have generally a fine edge, and often enough terminated in a sharp ])oint To us it seems easy enough to turn the good qualitie.s of the sharp flakes to other uses than merely as tools. The instinct of self-presei-A'ation is paramount in all hviman beings, and. as has often been stated, it is the mother of all those inventions that have changed the life of our prehistoric ancestors into that of modem mankind.
  • Nominees Named in Virtuoso and Virtuoso Life Magazine's 2Nd Annual “Best of the Best Hotel Awards”

    Nominees Named in Virtuoso and Virtuoso Life Magazine's 2Nd Annual “Best of the Best Hotel Awards”

    EXPERTS FROM VIRTUOSO® TRAVEL NETWORK DOMINATE TRAVEL+LEISURE’S 2015 A-LIST OF INDUSTRY ALL-STARS Eleven Virtuoso Travel Advisors Selected As Super-Agents NEW YORK (September 1, 2015) International luxury travel network Virtuoso® is proud to announce that 75 of its experts have been named to Travel+Leisure’s 14th annual A-List of top travel specialists. Virtuoso is the most celebrated network on the coveted list, with its elite travel advisors and preferred partners accounting for 55 percent of those honored and nabbing 11 out of 12 Super-Agent spots. Travel+Leisure Publisher Jay Meyer and Editor in Chief Nathan Lump debuted the hotly anticipated A-List at the 27th annual Virtuoso Travel Week at Bellagio in Las Vegas on August 10. The complete list will appear in the magazine’s September issue. Its editors assembled the prestigious list based on nominations, followed by a thorough review and vetting of the travel experts’ qualifications. The list features 12 Super-Agents, 11 of whom are members of the Virtuoso network. These Super-Agents bring unparalleled experience to their clients, alongside the ability to turn any travel dream into a reality. Virtuosos also dominated areas on the list including family travel (five out of seven advisors), cruising (five out of seven), adventure (all four named are Virtuosos), luxury travel (all three advisors named) and destinations (such as 16 out of 28 specializing in Europe). “We debut the A-List at Virtuoso Travel Week simply because so many of the experts named to our list are members or partners of the Virtuoso network,” says Jay Meyer, publisher of Travel+Leisure.
  • “An Audience with the Queen”: Indigenous Australians and the Crown, 1854-2017

    “An Audience with the Queen”: Indigenous Australians and the Crown, 1854-2017

    2018 V “An audience with the Queen”: Indigenous Australians and the Crown, 1854-2017 Mark McKenna Article: “An audience with the Queen”: Indigenous Australians and the Crown, 1954-2017 “An audience with the Queen”: Indigenous Australians and the Crown, 1954- 2017 Mark McKenna Abstract: This article is the first substantial examination of the more recent historical relationship between Indigenous Australians and the Crown. While the earlier tradition of perceiving the Queen as benefactress has survived in Indigenous communities, it now co- exists with more critical and antagonistic views. After the High Court’s Mabo decision (1992), the passage of the Native Title Act (1993), and the federal government’s Apology to the Stolen Generations (2008), it is clear that the only avenues for seriously redressing Indigenous grievances lie within the courts and parliaments of Australia. The Australian monarch—either as a supportive voice, or as a vehicle for highlighting the failure of Australian governments— no longer holds any substantial political utility for Indigenous Australians. Monarchy has become largely irrelevant to the fate of future Indigenous claims for political and social justice. Keywords: monarchy, republic, Indigenous Australia n October 1999, a delegation of Indigenous leaders from Australia visited Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace. The ‘audience,’ which lasted for little more than an hour and was widely reported in the British and Australian press, was claimed to Ibe the first granted to Indigenous Australians by a reigning British monarch since 24 May 1793, when Bennelong, who had been captured by Governor Arthur Phillip in Sydney and later sailed with him to England, was presented to King George III.1 The 206-year hiatus was telling for more than one reason.
  • FIGHTING OVER COUNTRY: Anthropological Perspectives

    FIGHTING OVER COUNTRY: Anthropological Perspectives

    FIGHTING OVER COUNTRY: Anthropological Perspectives Edited by D.E. Smith and J. Finlayson Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research The Australian National University, Canberra Research Monograph No. 12 1997 First published in Australia 1997. Printed by Instant Colour Press, Canberra, Australia. © Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University. This book is copyright Apart from any fair dealings for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. National Library of Australia. Cataloguing-in-publication entry. Fighting over country: anthropological perspectives ISBN 07315 2561 2. 1. Aborigines, Australian - Land tenure. 2. Native title - Australia. 3. Torres Strait Islanders - Land tenure. 4. Land use - Australia. I. Finlayson, Julie, n. Smith, Diane (Diane Evelyn). ID. The Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. (Series: Research monograph (The Australian National University. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research); no. 12). 306.320899915 Acknowledgments A number of people assisted in the organisation and conduct of the workshop Fighting Over Country: Anthropological Perspectives held in Canberra in late September 1996. The workshop was the latest in a series sponsored by the Australian Anthropological Society focusing on land rights and native title issues. Diane Smith, Julie Finlayson, Francesca Merlan, Mary Edmunds and David Trigger formed the organising committee, and ongoing administrative support was provided by the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR). The Native Titles Research Unit of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) provided modest but very helpful financial assistance towards catering for the workshop.
  • FPA Legislation Committee Tabled Docu~Ent No. \

    FPA Legislation Committee Tabled Docu~Ent No. \

    FPA Legislation Committee Tabled Docu~ent No. \, By: Mr~ C'-tn~:S AOlSC, Date: b IV\a,c<J..-. J,od.D , e,. t\-40.M I ---------- - ~ -- Australian Government National IndigeJrums Australlfans Agency OFFICIAL Chief Executive Officer Ray Griggs AO, CSC Reference: EC20~000257 Senator Tim Ayres Labor Senator for New South Wales Deputy Chair, Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee 6 March 2020 Re: Additional Estimates 2019-2020 Dear Senatafyres ~l Thank you for your letter dated 25 February 2020 requesting information about Indigenous Advancement Strategy (IAS) and Aboriginals Benefit Account (ABA) grants and unsuccessful applications for the periods 1 January- 30 June 2019 and 1 July 2019 (Agency establishment) - 25 February 2020. The National Indigenous Australians Agency has prepared the attached information; due to reporting cycles, we have provided the requested information for the period 1 January 2019 - 31 January 2020. However we can provide the information for the additional period if required. As requested, assessment scores are provided for the merit-based grant rounds: NAIDOC and ABA. Assessment scores for NAIDOC and ABA are not comparable, as NAIDOC is scored out of 20 and ABA is scored out of 15. Please note as there were no NAIDOC or ABA grants/ unsuccessful applications between 1 July 2019 and 31 January 2020, Attachments Band D do not include assessment scores. Please also note the physical location of unsuccessful applicants has been included, while the service delivery locations is provided for funded grants. In relation to ABA grants, we have included the then Department's recommendations to the Minister, as requested.
  • KUNINJKU PEOPLE, BUFFALO, and CONSERVATION in ARNHEM LAND: ‘IT’S a CONTRADICTION THAT FRUSTRATES US’ Jon Altman

    KUNINJKU PEOPLE, BUFFALO, and CONSERVATION in ARNHEM LAND: ‘IT’S a CONTRADICTION THAT FRUSTRATES US’ Jon Altman

    3 KUNINJKU PEOPLE, BUFFALO, AND CONSERVATION IN ARNHEM LAND: ‘IT’S A CONTRADICTION THAT FRUSTRATES US’ Jon Altman On Tuesday 20 May 2014 I was escorting two philanthropists to rock art galleries at Dukaladjarranj on the edge of the Arnhem Land escarpment. I was there in a corporate capacity, as a direc- tor of the Karrkad-Kanjdji Trust, seeking to raise funds to assist the Djelk and Warddeken Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) in their work tackling the conservation challenges of maintain- ing the environmental and cultural values of 20,000 square kilometres of western Arnhem Land. We were flying low in a Robinson R44 helicopter over the Tomkinson River flood plains – Bulkay – wetlands renowned for their biodiversity. The experienced pilot, nicknamed ‘Batman’, flew very low, pointing out to my guests herds of wild buffalo and their highly visible criss-cross tracks etched in the landscape. He remarked over the intercom: ‘This is supposed to be an IPA but those feral buffalo are trashing this country, they should be eliminated, shot out like up at Warddeken’. His remarks were hardly helpful to me, but he had a point that I could not easily challenge mid-air; buffalo damage in an iconic wetland within an IPA looked bad. Later I tried to explain to the guests in a quieter setting that this was precisely why the Djelk Rangers needed the extra philanthropic support that the Karrkad-Kanjdji Trust was seeking to raise. * * * 3093 Unstable Relations.indd 54 5/10/2016 5:40 PM Kuninjku People, Buffalo, and Conservation in Arnhem Land This opening vignette highlights a contradiction that I want to explore from a variety of perspectives in this chapter – abundant populations of environmentally destructive wild buffalo roam widely in an Indigenous Protected Area (IPA) declared for its natural and cultural values of global significance, according to International Union for the Conservation of Nature criteria.
  • Debates Part II-Questions Part III-Minutes

    Debates Part II-Questions Part III-Minutes

    NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA LEGISLA TIVE ASSEMBLY Second Assembly Second Sessjon Parliamentary Record Tuesday 12 February 1980 VVednesday 13 February 1980 Thursday 14 February 1980 Tuesday 19 February 1980 VVednesday 20 February 1980 Thursday 21 February 1980 Part I-Debates Part II-Questions Part III-Minutes 18990.803-1 PART I DEBATES DEBATES - Tuesday 12 February 1980 Mr Speaker MacFarlane took the Chair at 10 am. KATHERINE HOSPITAL ADVISORY BOARD ANNUAL REPORT Mr TUXWORTH (Health): Mr Speaker, I table the Katherine Hospital Advisory Board report for the year ended 30 June 1979. This is tabled pursuant to section 15 of the Hospital Advisory Boards Act. Section 14 of the act requires the board to submit an annual report each July while section 15 requires such a report to be tabled on the first sitting day thereafter. The current report was not received until November and today is the first opportun­ ity to table the report. DRC REPORT and COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN REPORT Mr EVERINGHAM (Chief Minister): Mr Speaker, I table 2 documents. The first one is the final report of the Darwin Reconstruction Commission and the second is a report of the Commonwealth Ombudsman. Section 19(1) of the Ombudsman Act 1976 of the Commonwealth requires the presentation of this report by the Prime Minister in the Legislative Assembly. He was not able to get here because he is on his way back from America and he has asked me to do it for him. PERSONAL EXPLANATION Mr EVERINGHAM (Chief Minister) (by leave): Mr Speaker, in the NT News of Saturday 9 February,an article appeared which, amongst other things, stated that the Chief Minister hit back with 2 points.
  • Early Texts and Other Sources

    Early Texts and Other Sources

    7 Early texts and other sources Introduction In order to demonstrate that native title has survived, the court will require that the laws and customs of the claimant society be shown not only to have survived substantially uninterrupted but also to have remained ‘traditional’1 in their content. What exactly is to be understood by the use of the term ‘traditional’ has been subject to extensive debate.2 Most, if not all, of the ethnography relevant to a native title inquiry will demonstrate the fact of some form of change. This is unsurprising since few anthropologists would argue for an unchanging society. It is the degree and measure of the change against customary systems that is subject to contestation. In short, 1 ‘A traditional law or custom is one which has been passed from generation to generation of a society, usually by word of mouth and common practice. But in the context of the Native Title Act, “traditional” carries with it two other elements in its meaning. First, it conveys an understanding of the age of the traditions: the origins of the content of the law or custom concerned are to be found in the normative rules of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander societies that existed before the assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown. It is only those normative rules that are “traditional” laws and customs. Second, and no less important, the reference to rights or interests in land or waters being possessed under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed by the peoples concerned, requires that the normative system under which the rights and interests are possessed (the traditional laws and customs) is a system that has had a continuous existence and vitality since sovereignty.