DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL 2019 REPORT THIS YEAR’S CONTRIBUTORS Text Alex Smith (Head of Post-excavation), Alistair Webb (Regional Manager), Andy Boucher (Director of Commercial Operations), Andy Towle (Consultancy Director), Edward Bailey (SHEQ & Contracting Manager), Owen Raybould (Principal Consultant), Julie Franklin (Finds & Archiving Manager), Michael Tierney (Regional Manager), Rachel McMullan (Marketing Coordinator), Russel Coleman (Managing Director) Design Julia Bastek-Michalska (Graphics Manager), Rafael Maya Torcelly (Illustrator), Eleanor Winter (Illustrator) ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS 2 Our vision, our ethos 3 Letter from the Managing Director 5 Surveying the way forward 7 A history of archaeology at RSK 11 Monographs and a medieval jug 14 Meet some of our new staff 17 Safety, Health, Environmental & Quality 19 Business Structure 20 Sales Statistics 21 Business Development 23 Business Operations 27 Case Studies 41 Outlook ANNUAL REPORT 2019 OUR VISION OUR ETHOS Headland Archaeology was founded in 1996 by four Our success and respected industry reputation led to our like-minded archaeologists with a strong commitment recent acquisition by the RSK Group, an environmental to commercially-focused client delivery. In a business and engineering company which has a similar ethos that traditionally dominated by the not-for-profit sector, their people and clients are the core of their business. Headland Archaeology is one of the UK’s leading privately- As a part of this larger organisation we continue to lead owned providers of heritage services to the development from the front, encouraging innovation and excellence in and construction industries. We offer a wide range of all aspects of our work. archaeological services covering the life cycle of a project from design through to construction. Our pragmatic and Headland supports the development and construction professional approach has earned us multiple awards sectors throughout the UK from five offices – Edinburgh, and an industry-leading reputation for delivering on time Leeds, Manchester, Hereford and Luton. Our regional and within budget. This ethos is applied to all projects, network means that we can offer our clients essential local whether we are working on a fast-track road or rail project, knowledge, whilst our national coverage means we can a multi-phase housing development or quarry, or a wind also offer them a consistent product and customer service farm in a complex upland or lowland landscape setting. no matter where their development is in the UK. SCOTLAND YORKSHIRE & NORTH NORTH WEST SOUTH & EAST MIDLANDS & WEST ANNUAL REPORT 2019 “Even when we were a small company, we always had a vision of what we wanted to be, what we wanted to look like and where we wanted to get to.” Russel Coleman Managing Director Letter from the Managing Director As we go to print with our latest Annual Report, it is Throw in the review of HS2, two major storms which put hard to believe a full year has passed since we joined many of our sites underwater and now, COVID-19. It’s not the RSK Group. This report covers our last year before easy running a business at the best of times, but 2020 looks the acquisition as well and our first full year in RSK. like the ultimate test. For the management team at Headland, 2019 saw However, it was noticeable that once the election was out a number of changes in the way we do things, to fit in of the way in November, the floodgates opened and we with the way the Group does business; but for most of us have since been inundated with enquiries, many of which it’s been business as usual. We now see opportunities we have now been converted. It means that this current would not normally see, which has allowed us to widen the financial year, 2020/21, will be even busier than forecast services we can provide to our clients and we have learnt and our teams are working hard to plan ahead. As part of much from our new colleagues in other RSK businesses. We this process, we have recently restructured the company couldn’t ask for more. We really are a one stop shop now along slightly different lines and generally refreshed and we firmly believe we have a unique selling point within the business to take us forward for the next few years. our sector. Judging by the many positive testimonials we Balancing major infrastructure projects with sustainable get, our clients agree. core work has never been easy. The government's ‘build, build, build’ strategy is really helping us to cope with the Our last financial year, 2018/19, as the ‘original’ Headland was impact of COVID-19 on the rest of our business but is also its most successful, with turnover c £16m for 10 months of a real challenge in itself. When we first started the business, trading – we have since changed our financial year to align we always had a vision of what we wanted to be, what with RSK. We also waved goodbye to two of the original we wanted to look like and where we wanted to get to. founders of the business, Tim Holden and Chris Lowe, and That has never been clearer in our minds as it is now as we we wish them a long and happy retirement. enter a new decade and a new normal. Our first year in RSK, 2019/20, was a strange one. Brexit and the election created an early paralysis in the marketplace. Annual Report 2019 Surveying the way forward page | 5 Surveying the way forward Headland’s geophysics department has This flexibility has enabled us to successfully With the current boom in infrastructure been the cornerstone of the success of the complete surveys on a range of sites that projects showing no sign of abating in the Yorkshire & North office since it opened in would have been impossible for conventional near future we are eager to build on our March 2015. From the beginning our aim systems including fields containing mature successes of the last five years and moving has been to be innovators in the field of potatoes, fields of high value market garden to our new premises in early 2020 will be archaeological geophysics while offering crops and across uneven peat hag terrain key to future expansion. Other opportunities our clients a cost-effective service. (photo). Our system is particularly cost are opening up as we develop relationships effective on large infrastructure sites such as with our parent company, RSK, and all the From the beginning we made a conscious pipe, cable or road corridors or large urban other companies in the group and we are decision not to go down the route of expansion schemes allowing us to cover already seeing an increase in the number of developing a push, pulled or towed array. up to 12 hectares per day per team in an tender opportunities coming our way. These survey methods are only good to use 8-hour working day. Progress has been rapid under ideal conditions but quickly become and since 2015 we have surveyed just over In the meantime we continue to innovate difficult or impossible to use at certain 8,900 hectares, increasing our coverage year and to look for other ways that we can times in the agricultural cycle (high crop), on year. better serve our existing client base. The on uneven surfaces or when conditions holy grail of archaeological geophysics underfoot become sticky. Therefore, we To provide such a high level of activity we remains to develop a system that can have developed a more mobile system that now have three full time teams with the provide detailed data on any site at any allows us to operate on most sites most of ability to bring in a fourth team during time of year and in all weather conditions. the time and cover large areas on a daily basis exceptionally busy periods. This gives us Work is currently ongoing. even under poor ground conditions. Our the potential of covering up to 130 hectares system comprises a multi-sensor array, which per week and the possibility of completing combines the flexibility of a hand carried a 500-hectare site in under a month, totals system with the accuracy of geo-referencing, that would have been unthinkable even thereby eliminating the need to set out grids. five years ago. Written by Alistair Webb Annual Report 2019 A history of archaeology at RSK page | 7 A history of archaeology at RSK RSK was established in 1989 by Alan Ryder The sea-change came in 2005 with the so- company) were required to oversee the following submission of his PhD on the called Dash for Gas, and the construction work of 120 concurrent subcontracted environmental impact of oil pipelines. of the 317km South Wales Gas Pipeline to archaeological field staff. The overall The first few of the young company’s transport liquid natural gas imported by turnover for this project alone equalled contracts were, unsurprisingly, oil pipeline tanker into Milford Haven to the national English Heritage’s annual research budget assessments and at this time external gas network at Tirley in Gloucestershire. at that time. archaeological contractors were employed. RSK were responsible for all aspects of the It wasn’t until 2000 that RSK recruited its project Environmental Impact Assessment RSK have historically specialised in the first in-house full-time archaeologist. For (EIA), as well as construction contractor delivery of multi-disciplinary environmental the following five years RSK carried out support for the Felindre to Brecon section. assessments, which the Archaeology consultancy and managed subcontractors’ For this project, five full-time archaeological team contributed to, finding savings and archaeological fieldwork.
Recommended publications
  • August Forecast Tnuos Tariffs

    August Forecast Tnuos Tariffs

    Five-Year View of TNUoS Tariffs for 2021/22 to 2025/26 National Grid Electricity System Operator August 2020 Five-Year View of TNUoS Tariffs for 2021/22 to 2025/26 | Error! No text of specified style in document. 0 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 4 Forecast Approach ................................................................................................. 7 Generation tariffs ................................................................................................. 11 1. Generation tariffs summary ....................................................................................................... 12 2. Generation wider tariffs.............................................................................................................. 12 3. Changes to wider tariffs over the five-year period ..................................................................... 16 Onshore local tariffs for generation ...................................................................... 19 4. Onshore local substation tariffs ................................................................................................. 19 5. Onshore local circuit tariffs ........................................................................................................ 20 Offshore local tariffs for generation ...................................................................... 23 6. Offshore local generation tariffs ................................................................................................
  • 14 4 Mouchel Viking Peat Volumes and Reuse

    14 4 Mouchel Viking Peat Volumes and Reuse

    Viking Energy Partnership Viking Wind Farm Technical Appendix 14.4 Estimated Peat Extraction Volume and Potential Reuse Options March 2009 Viking Energy Partnership Mouchel Ltd The Gutters Hut Unit 11, Scion House North Ness Business Park Stirling University Innovation Park Lerwick Stirling Shetland FK9 4NF ZE1 0LZ Tel. 01786 449 131 Fax. 01786 449 852 Viking Energy Partnership Viking Estimated Peat Extraction Volume & Potential Reuse Options Signature FINAL ISSUE Name Date Prepared by Malcolm Macfie 04/03/2009 Checked by Stuart Bone 10/03/2009 Approved by Malcolm Macfie 12/03/2009 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 2 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................................... 2 3 ESTIMATION OF EXCAVATED PEAT VOLUMES .......................................................... 2 3.1 Access Tracks ............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Turbine Bases ............................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Compounds ................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Borrow Pits .................................................................................................................. 7 3.5 Substations .................................................................................................................
  • 1 Marine Scotland. Draft Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind

    1 Marine Scotland. Draft Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind

    Marine Scotland. Draft Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind (Dec 2019) Supplementary Advice to SNH Consultation Response (25 March 2020). SNH Assessment of Potential Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impacts and Provision of Design Guidance This document sets out SNH’s Landscape and Visual Impact appraisal of each of the Draft Plan Option (DPO) areas presented in the above consultation and the opportunities for mitigating these, through windfarm siting and design. Due to its size, we are submitting it separately from our main response to the draft Plan. We had hoped to be able to submit this earlier within the consultation period and apologise that this was delayed slightly. Our advice is in three parts: Part 1. Context and Approach taken to Assessment Part 2. DPO Assessment and Design Guidance Part 3. DPO Assessment and Design Guidance: Supporting Maps Should you wish to discuss any of the matters raised in our response we would be pleased to do so. Please contact George Lees at [email protected] / 01738 44417. PART 1. CONTEXT AND APPROACH TAKEN TO ASSESSMENT Background 1. In late spring 2018 SNH were invited to participate as part of a Project Steering group to input to the next Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy by Marine Scotland. SNH landscape advisors with Marine Energy team colleagues recognised this as a real opportunity to manage on-going, planned change from offshore wind at the strategic and regional level, to safeguard nationally important protected landscapes and distinctive coastal landscape character. It also reflected our ethos of encouraging well designed sustainable development of the right scale in the right place and as very much part of early engagement.
  • Appendix A14.6 SEMP TS3 (Addendum)

    Appendix A14.6 SEMP TS3 (Addendum)

    TECHNICAL APPENDIX 14.6 VIKING WIND FARM ADDENDUM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP) TECHNICAL SCHEDULE No. 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) Document Ref. TS3 Page i SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN VIKING WIND FARM TECHNICAL SCHEDULE 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN SEMP Version: 1.0 Rev No. Revision Description: Date : 0.0 Addendum ES, Appendix A14.6 Sept 2010 Name : Position : Signature : Prepared by : Jane MacDonald Environmental Manager SSE Renewables / Viking Checked by : Andrew Sloan Energy PM Reviewed by : Oliver Moffat BMT Cordah Comment : Document was also reviewed by all consultants involved in preparation of the Addendum ES. SEPA were also consulted and provided feedback which has been incorporated into this document. TECHNICAL APPENDIX 14.6 VIKING WIND FARM ADDENDUM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP) TECHNICAL SCHEDULE No. 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) Document Ref. TS3 Page ii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope and Requirements ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Reference Documentation ........................................................................... 2 2 SWMP MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 4 2.1 Implementation of a SWMP ........................................................................
  • Sse Plc Sustainability Report 2020 Sustainability Report

    Sse Plc Sustainability Report 2020 Sustainability Report

    SSE PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2020 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ABOUT THIS REPORT Contents SSE plc is a UK-listed energy company that operates throughout the UK Chief Executive’s Statement 2 and Ireland. The disclosure of SSE’s most material sustainability impacts is integrated throughout its Annual Report 2020. The Sustainability Report Our business model 4 aims to provide enhanced disclosure of SSE’s key policies, management Our purpose and strategy 4 and performance of its economic, social and environmental impacts. What we do and who we do it for 5 Sustainability approach and governance 6 SSE’s sustainability approach is aligned to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Identifying material issues 8 Reporting against the SDGs most material to SSE’s Emerging trends 8 business can be found on the following pages of this Working for and with stakeholders 10 report: Group Principal Risks 12 Global frameworks and partnerships 13 Aligning to the UN's SDGs 15 The scope of this report is generally focused on performance data for the financial year ending 31 March 2020. However, the period between Taking meaningful climate action 16 SSE’s year end and the publication of this report was dominated by the Embedding climate action 19 coronavirus emergency and therefore some activities during this period Measuring performance 22 have also been included. Climate-related financial disclosure 24 On occasion the report refers to activities of SSE’s joint ventures and Protecting the natural environment 32 in these instances it is made clear that this is the case. For a full list of Managing environmental impacts 32 SSE’s subsidiary undertakings, partnerships, joint ventures and associates, Using resources efficiently 34 please refer to pages 252 to 259 of SSE’s Annual Report 2020.
  • Forecast from 2016-17 to 2019-20

    Forecast from 2016-17 to 2019-20

    Tariff Information Paper Forecast TNUoS tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20 This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. This annual publication is intended to show how tariffs may evolve over the next five years. The forecast tariffs for 2016/17 will be refined throughout the year. 28 January 2015 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................4 2. Five Year Tariff Forecast Tables ...............................................................5 2.1 Generation Tariffs ................................................................................. 5 2.2 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ..............................................................10 2.3 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs .......................................................12 Any Questions? 2.4 Offshore Local Tariffs .........................................................................12 2.5 Demand Tariffs ...................................................................................13 Contact: 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes................................................................14 Mary Owen 3.1 CMP213 (Project TransmiT)...............................................................14 Stuart Boyle 3.2 HVDC Circuits.....................................................................................14 3.3 Contracted Generation .......................................................................15
  • Transmission Networks Connections Update

    Transmission Networks Connections Update

    Transmission Networks Connections Update May 2015 SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO Back to Contents TNCU – May 2015 Page 01 Contents Foreword ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 02 1. Introduction /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 03 2. Connection timescales ///////////////////////////////////////////// 04 Illustrative connection timescales /////////////////////////////////////// 04 Connections by area /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 05 3. GB projects by year ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 06 Contracted overall position /////////////////////////////////////////////// 08 Renewable projects status by year ///////////////////////////////////// 10 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Excluding Nuclear /// 11 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Nuclear only ////////// 12 Interconnector projects status by year //////////////////////////////// 13 4. Additional data by transmission owner ///////////////////////// 14 National Grid Electricity Transmission plc //////////////////////////// 16 Scottish Hydro Electricity Transmission plc ////////////////////////// 18 Scottish Power Transmission Limited ///////////////////////////////// 20 5. Connection locations /////////////////////////////////////////////// 22 Northern Scotland projects map //////////////////////////////////////// 25 Southern Scotland projects map /////////////////////////////////////// 28 Northern England projects map /////////////////////////////////////////
  • Community Benefits from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments

    Community Benefits from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments

    ScottIsh Government Good practIce prIncIples for CommunIty benefIts from Offshore renewable Energy developments 1 1 IntroductIon Scotland is estimated to have around a quarter of Europe’s potential offshore wind resources, and The Scottish Contents Government wishes to see communities across the country share in the benefits 1. Introduction 2. Principles from this rich natural resource. 3. Background 4. Designing a Community Benefit Package for Offshore Renewable Energy Projects The Scottish Government’s National Marine Plan While the majority of this document is intended to 5. Identification of Community (NMP) Renewables Policy 10 states that “Good be for developers of wind projects, it is proposed 6. Maximising Impact of Benefit Practice guidance for community benefit from that this document will be reviewed over the 7. Further Principles offshore wind and marine renewable energy coming years to incorporate guidance and good development should be followed by developers, practice for other offshore technologies. 8. Case Studies where appropriate”. This document looks at good 9. Further Reading practice in shaping and delivering community This document is split into definitions, context, 10. Glossary benefits from offshore renewable energy projects, good practice expectations and supplementary complementary to environmental, supply chain guidance for all involved. The intended readers of and other socio-economic benefits to Scotland. this document are developers, communities, local authorities and other stakeholders. When providing community benefits from offshore renewables, there are a number of factors to be The Scottish Government is committed to This document is available at: considered such as identifying the community, supporting the development of a successful www.localenergyscotland.org/goodpractice.
  • Tariff Information Paper

    Tariff Information Paper

    Tariff Information Paper This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2017/18 to 2020/21. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. Together with the final tariffs for 2016/17 this publication shows how tariffs may evolve over the the next next five years. Forecast tariffs for 2017/18 will be refined throughout the year. 11 February 2016 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................. 4 2. Tariff Forecast Tables ............................................................................... 5 2.1 Generator Wider Tariffs ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Summary of generator wider tariffs from 2016/17 to 2020/21 ........... 11 2.3 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ............................................................. 12 Any Questions? 2.4 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs ...................................................... 14 2.5 Offshore Local Tariffs ........................................................................ 14 Contact: 2.6 Small Generator Discount ................................................................. 15 Mary Owen 2.7 Demand Tariffs.................................................................................. 15 2.8 Summary of Demand Tariffs.............................................................. 16 Stuart Boyle 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes............................................................... 17
  • 2020 Routemap for Renewable Energy in Scotland – Update

    2020 Routemap for Renewable Energy in Scotland – Update

    2020 ROUTEMAP FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN SCOTLAND – UPDATE 19 December 2013 1 Contents Ministerial Foreword 1. Deployment Update 2. Update on Cross Cutting Challenges European Policy Context Public Engagement Electricity Market Reform Grid Access, Reinforcement, and Charging Planning and Consents Finance Supply Chain Skills 3. Sectoral Routemap Updates Onshore Wind Offshore Wind Marine Renewables Hydropower Bioenergy and Energy from Waste Community and Locally Owned Renewables Microgeneration Solar Renewable Heat Sustainable Transport Agri-Renewables 4. Supporting and Emerging Technologies Energy Storage Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Geothermal 5. Equalities Monitoring Update 2 MINISTERIAL FOREWORD Renewable energy is a central element of our strategy for a successful Scotland. Scotland’s vast renewable energy resources create major job and investment opportunities and – as part of a wider, balanced energy mix - will deliver secure, low carbon and cost-effective energy supplies. The Scottish Government’s 2020 Routemap for Renewable Energy in Scotland, published in 2011, established a target for the equivalent of 100% of Scotland’s electricity demand to be supplied from renewable sources by 2020. After exceeding our interim target to meet 31% of electricity demand from renewables by 2011, we confirmed in the first annual update of the Routemap last year that we had set a new, more ambitious interim target for 50% by 2015. It is complemented by equally an important target for an increase in renewable heat generation, as well as an increase in community and local ownership of renewable energy schemes. As this second annual update to the Routemap makes clear, we continue to make excellent progress towards these targets.
  • University of Dundee DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY Connecting the Dots

    University of Dundee DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY Connecting the Dots

    University of Dundee DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Connecting the dots A systemic approach to evaluating potential constraints to renewable electricity technology deployment to 2020 and beyond in the United Kingdom Wood, Geoffrey Craig Award date: 2013 Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 Connecting the dots: A systemic approach to evaluating potential constraints to renewable electricity technology deployment to 2020 and beyond in the United Kingdom Geoffrey Craig Wood A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Centre for Energy Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy (CEPMLP), University of Dundee September 2013 i Contents i Table of Contents iv List of Tables, Figures and Graphs vii List
  • SAFE ENERGY E-JOURNAL No.60

    SAFE ENERGY E-JOURNAL No.60

    No2NuclearPower SAFE ENERGY E-JOURNAL No.60 September 2013 The content of this e-journal was for the most part originally prepared for Nuclear Free Local Authorities and is reproduced, as adapted, with their permission but without liability for its contents. This briefing does not deal with the UK Government’s proposed new reactor programme. For an update on developments to do with new reactors see here: http://www.no2nuclearpower.org.uk/nuclearnews/NuClearNewsNo54.pdf If you would like to receive Daily Nuclear News updates by e-mail you can sign up here: http://www.no2nuclearpower.org.uk/mailing-lists/ 1 Climate Change It is clear the world is going to have to make some serious reductions in carbon emissions over the next 15 years to have any chance of avoiding dangerous climate change. 97% of climate scientists now agree that humans are causing global warming, so because this subject has such a huge impact on the nuclear debate it’s worth having a look at some of the numbers involved. (1) There are three important numbers (2) to look at: 2°C - every signatory to the UN Copenhagen Climate Talks in 2009 agreed that we must stop average global temperatures rising above this number. To have a reasonable chance of staying below 2°C we have to limit future emissions to 565 billion tons (Gigatonnes Gt). The problem is that we are releasing 30Gt every year, and this is going up at 3% a year. That means we have about 15 years before we reach the threshold. The number of tons of carbon in already proven fossil fuel reserves is 2795Gt - five times the amount needed to take us to 2°C warming.