DOCSLIB.ORG

Jan-Robert Riise Governance & Law Director of Corporate Services: Christine Ferguson Corporate Services Department Montfield, Lerwick Shetland, ZE1 0LA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jan-Robert Riise Governance & Law Director of Corporate Services: Christine Ferguson Corporate Services Department Montfield, Lerwick Shetland, ZE1 0LA Shetland Islands Council Executive Manager: Jan-Robert Riise Governance & Law Director of Corporate Services: Christine Ferguson Corporate Services Department Montfield, Lerwick Shetland, ZE1 0LA Telephone: 01595 744550 Fax: 01595 744585 [email protected] www.shetland.gov.uk If calling please ask for Louise Adamson Direct Dial: 01595 744555 Email: [email protected] Date: 6 February 2019 Dear Sir/Madam You are invited to the following meeting: Planning Committee Council Chamber, Town Hall, Lerwick Wednesday 13 February 2019 at 2pm Apologies for absence should be notified to Louise Adamson at the above number. Yours faithfully Executive Manager – Governance and Law Chair: Mr T Smith Vice-Chair: Ms A Manson AGENDA (a) Hold circular calling the meeting as read. (b) Apologies for absence, if any. (c) Declarations of Interest – Members are asked to consider whether they have an interest to declare in relation to any item on the agenda for this meeting. Any Member making a declaration of interest should indicate whether it is a financial or non-financial interest and include some information on the nature of the interest. Advice may be sought from Officers prior to the meeting taking place. (d) Confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 8 October 2018, enclosed. - 1 - Items 1. 2018/335/ECUCON - To vary the consent by increasing the maximum tip height of the turbines from 145 metres (m) to a maximum of 155 m and increasing the maximum rotor diameter of the turbines by 10 m to a maximum of 120 m. The installed capacity of the proposed generating stated would be greater than 50 MW. (Viking Wind Farm). PL-01-19 2. 2018/297/PPF - Change of use of land and development of a new external display area comprising new timber-framed boat shelters (enclosed on 3 sides), new concrete slab paving, gravel/chipped display areas and associated surface water drainage, Scalloway Museum, Castle Street, Scalloway. PL-02-19 - 2 - Shetland (d) Islands Council MINUTE A&B - Public Planning Committee Council Chamber, Town Hall, Lerwick Monday 8 October 2018 at 3pm Present: M Bell S Coutts E Macdonald A Manson D Sandison T Smith Apologies: D Simpson C Smith G Smith In Attendance (Officers): J Holden, Team Leader – Development Management A Melkevik, Planning Officer P Sutherland, Solicitor L Adamson, Committee Officer Chair Mr T Smith, Chair of the Planning Committee, presided. Circular The circular calling the meeting was held as read. Declarations of Interest None. 13/18 Minutes The Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting held on 14 August 2018 on the motion of Mr Sandison, seconded by Ms Macdonald. The Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting held on 23 August 2018 on the motion of Mr Bell, seconded by Mr Coutts. The Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting held on 3 September 2018 on the motion of Mr Bell, seconded by Ms Macdonald. The Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting held on 11 September 2018 on the motion of Ms Manson, seconded by Ms Macdonald. 14/18 2018/007/PPF – To Construct Septic Tank to Serve Proposed Dwellinghouse, West of 'The Pund', Mossbank The Committee considered a report by the Planning Officer – Development Management [RECORD Appendix 1]. 1 - 3 - The Planning Officer (A Melkevik) advised that while she would be introducing the application she had not been the Case Officer. The Planning Officer gave a presentation which illustrated the following: Photo of the proposed site Site and Location Plans – showing the proposed house and septic tank Site Plan showing foul/surface water details Policy WD2 Waste Water Aerial View of Sites in Mossbank Key Issues The Planning Officer advised that the principle of a dwellinghouse on this proposed site has already been approved under planning application 2017/292/PPF, and Members will note that the site plan shows the location of the proposed septic tank and surface water drainage and connections to the dwellinghouse. The Planning Officer advised that Shetland Local Development Plan (2014) Policy WD2 states that: “New developments which require waste water disposal and are located within or adjacent to settlements are expected to connect to the public sewer. Where a connection to the public sewer is not achievable and a wastewater system such as a private septic tank is proposed the developer should demonstrate that: There should be no detrimental effect, including cumulative effect, on the surrounding uses, natural, built environment and cultural heritage.” The Planning Officer advised that SEPA were consulted on the application as the proposal triggered a need from their consultation checklist as a private waste water system is proposed within an existing settlement. SEPA objected to the application due to lack of information with regards to foul drainage and requested further information from the applicant to demonstrate that an application to connect to mains drainage to serve the proposed dwellinghouse has been refused by Scottish Water. There have been discussions between the agent and Scottish Water with regards to connection to their infrastructure but no official refusal of connection so no further information could be submitted to SEPA to demonstrate this. The Planning Officer reported that further information was submitted to SEPA from the applicant following on from their original discussions with Scottish Water with regards to connections and distances. Scottish Water have voiced their concerns over the state of the sewage network in the area but they will not provide a letter refusing connection to it. The applicant also has concerns about connecting to a network Scottish Water do not have confidence in. The Planning Officer advised that the applicant has stated that concerns have been raised locally, and that having spoken to house owners in Maidenfield and the landowners/tenants there have been issues with the local sewer before with blockages and overflowing. The applicant also received a quote for the 2 - 4 - proposed connection which was approximately £25,000, a figure that they have said would not allow the progression of the build. The installation of a pumping station has also been considered by the applicant but the practicality of having to pump the effluent 100m and the higher costs associated with this does not they say make it a viable option. The Planning Officer confirmed that SEPA have maintained their objection as the further information supplied did not enable them to change their position in the matter. The applicant then instructed for the application to be determined with the provided information as more information could not be provided for SEPA to remove their objection. In referring to a similar application (Ref: 2017/247/AMSC) for a proposed dwellinghouse with a connection to a private bio plant treatment tank to deal with foul water at Straits, Mossbank which is to the North of the site in question, the Planning Officer reported that as there is a sewer in the area it was expected that the proposed dwellinghouse at Straits would connect to it unless a case could be made for the installation of a private septic tank with a departure from Policy WD2. The agent for the application provided information in support of installing a private foul water treatment system, including a SEPA CAR licence that authorised the discharge of sewage effluent by the means that was proposed there. Information was also submitted by that agent stating that for the 100m length of pipe required to connect that proposed dwelling to the public sewer its applicant found it less expensive to install the private foul water treatment than to connect to the nearby public sewer, and therefore determined that while the application may be contrary to SLDP Policy WD2 they wished for it to be determined on the basis of the information that had been submitted. She reported that the application was refused by the Appointed Person under delegated powers on the basis that it did not comply with Policy WD2 because as a proposal it departed from the ambit of the planning permission in principle that had been granted by proposing to deal with foul drainage by a means other than a piped connection to the public sewer, and it was considered no material information had been submitted which allowed the provisions of the development plan to be set aside. That decision was then appealed and the case was reviewed by the Local Review Body (LRB) at its meeting held on 10 April 2018, where at a public hearing maps were shown to the LRB, which it was said highlighted the practical difficulties to connect to the public sewer in Mossbank, and the case was made for an exception rather than a requirement to connect to the public sewer. That proposal was then approved at the LRB, with regards to the wording of Policy WD2 it being highlighted that the word ‘expected’ rather than ‘required’ is used which allows for consideration of exceptions in certain circumstances. The LRB was satisfied for that application that the case had been made for an exception rather than there being a requirement to connect to the public sewer, saying that the Council, and previous Councils, have always encouraged people to build in rural areas of Shetland, and there is the need to encourage people to do their best for what they can afford. With regards to this proposal, the Planning Officer reported that the applicant has put forward a case that it is not cost effective or feasible to continue with the original proposal to connect to the public sewer, in a similar way to the one made by the applicant in respect of application at Straits. Unlike in that case, here a SEPA CAR licence has not been granted, and therefore an assessment 3 - 5 - to determine if this is potentially a consentable discharge at this time by SEPA has still to be undertaken, meaning that in the context of this proposal even with acceptance that connection to the public sewer is not achievable, the developer has still to demonstrate wholly that the installation of a septic tank and soakaway to serve the dwellinghouse approved under permission ref.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • August Forecast Tnuos Tariffs
    Five-Year View of TNUoS Tariffs for 2021/22 to 2025/26 National Grid Electricity System Operator August 2020 Five-Year View of TNUoS Tariffs for 2021/22 to 2025/26 | Error! No text of specified style in document. 0 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 4 Forecast Approach ................................................................................................. 7 Generation tariffs ................................................................................................. 11 1. Generation tariffs summary ....................................................................................................... 12 2. Generation wider tariffs.............................................................................................................. 12 3. Changes to wider tariffs over the five-year period ..................................................................... 16 Onshore local tariffs for generation ...................................................................... 19 4. Onshore local substation tariffs ................................................................................................. 19 5. Onshore local circuit tariffs ........................................................................................................ 20 Offshore local tariffs for generation ...................................................................... 23 6. Offshore local generation tariffs ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14 4 Mouchel Viking Peat Volumes and Reuse
    Viking Energy Partnership Viking Wind Farm Technical Appendix 14.4 Estimated Peat Extraction Volume and Potential Reuse Options March 2009 Viking Energy Partnership Mouchel Ltd The Gutters Hut Unit 11, Scion House North Ness Business Park Stirling University Innovation Park Lerwick Stirling Shetland FK9 4NF ZE1 0LZ Tel. 01786 449 131 Fax. 01786 449 852 Viking Energy Partnership Viking Estimated Peat Extraction Volume & Potential Reuse Options Signature FINAL ISSUE Name Date Prepared by Malcolm Macfie 04/03/2009 Checked by Stuart Bone 10/03/2009 Approved by Malcolm Macfie 12/03/2009 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 1 2 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................................... 2 3 ESTIMATION OF EXCAVATED PEAT VOLUMES .......................................................... 2 3.1 Access Tracks ............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Turbine Bases ............................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Compounds ................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Borrow Pits .................................................................................................................. 7 3.5 Substations .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Marine Scotland. Draft Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind
    Marine Scotland. Draft Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind (Dec 2019) Supplementary Advice to SNH Consultation Response (25 March 2020). SNH Assessment of Potential Seascape, Landscape and Visual Impacts and Provision of Design Guidance This document sets out SNH’s Landscape and Visual Impact appraisal of each of the Draft Plan Option (DPO) areas presented in the above consultation and the opportunities for mitigating these, through windfarm siting and design. Due to its size, we are submitting it separately from our main response to the draft Plan. We had hoped to be able to submit this earlier within the consultation period and apologise that this was delayed slightly. Our advice is in three parts: Part 1. Context and Approach taken to Assessment Part 2. DPO Assessment and Design Guidance Part 3. DPO Assessment and Design Guidance: Supporting Maps Should you wish to discuss any of the matters raised in our response we would be pleased to do so. Please contact George Lees at [email protected] / 01738 44417. PART 1. CONTEXT AND APPROACH TAKEN TO ASSESSMENT Background 1. In late spring 2018 SNH were invited to participate as part of a Project Steering group to input to the next Sectoral Plan for Offshore Wind Energy by Marine Scotland. SNH landscape advisors with Marine Energy team colleagues recognised this as a real opportunity to manage on-going, planned change from offshore wind at the strategic and regional level, to safeguard nationally important protected landscapes and distinctive coastal landscape character. It also reflected our ethos of encouraging well designed sustainable development of the right scale in the right place and as very much part of early engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy
    STACK ROCK 2020 An illustrated guide to sea stack climbing in the UK & Ireland - Old Harry - - Old Man of Stoer - - Am Buachaille - - The Maiden - - The Old Man of Hoy - - over 200 more - Edition I - version 1 - 13th March 1994. Web Edition - version 1 - December 1996. Web Edition - version 2 - January 1998. Edition 2 - version 3 - January 2002. Edition 3 - version 1 - May 2019. Edition 4 - version 1 - January 2020. Compiler Chris Mellor, 4 Barnfield Avenue, Shirley, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 8SE. Tel: 0208 662 1176 – E-mail: [email protected]. Send in amendments, corrections and queries by e-mail. ISBN - 1-899098-05-4 Acknowledgements Denis Crampton for enduring several discussions in which the concept of this book was developed. Also Duncan Hornby for information on Dorset’s Old Harry stacks and Mick Fowler for much help with some of his southern and northern stack attacks. Mike Vetterlein contributed indirectly as have Rick Cummins of Rock Addiction, Rab Anderson and Bruce Kerr. Andy Long from Lerwick, Shetland. has contributed directly with a lot of the hard information about Shetland. Thanks are also due to Margaret of the Alpine Club library for assistance in looking up old journals. In late 1996 Ben Linton, Ed Lynch-Bell and Ian Brodrick undertook the mammoth scanning and OCR exercise needed to transfer the paper text back into computer form after the original electronic version was lost in a disk crash. This was done in order to create a world-wide web version of the guide. Mike Caine of the Manx Fell and Rock Club then helped with route information from his Manx climbing web site.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A14.6 SEMP TS3 (Addendum)
    TECHNICAL APPENDIX 14.6 VIKING WIND FARM ADDENDUM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP) TECHNICAL SCHEDULE No. 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) Document Ref. TS3 Page i SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN VIKING WIND FARM TECHNICAL SCHEDULE 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN SEMP Version: 1.0 Rev No. Revision Description: Date : 0.0 Addendum ES, Appendix A14.6 Sept 2010 Name : Position : Signature : Prepared by : Jane MacDonald Environmental Manager SSE Renewables / Viking Checked by : Andrew Sloan Energy PM Reviewed by : Oliver Moffat BMT Cordah Comment : Document was also reviewed by all consultants involved in preparation of the Addendum ES. SEPA were also consulted and provided feedback which has been incorporated into this document. TECHNICAL APPENDIX 14.6 VIKING WIND FARM ADDENDUM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP) TECHNICAL SCHEDULE No. 3 SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) Document Ref. TS3 Page ii CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Scope and Requirements ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Reference Documentation ........................................................................... 2 2 SWMP MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS .................................................................. 4 2.1 Implementation of a SWMP ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sse Plc Sustainability Report 2020 Sustainability Report
    SSE PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2020 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ABOUT THIS REPORT Contents SSE plc is a UK-listed energy company that operates throughout the UK Chief Executive’s Statement 2 and Ireland. The disclosure of SSE’s most material sustainability impacts is integrated throughout its Annual Report 2020. The Sustainability Report Our business model 4 aims to provide enhanced disclosure of SSE’s key policies, management Our purpose and strategy 4 and performance of its economic, social and environmental impacts. What we do and who we do it for 5 Sustainability approach and governance 6 SSE’s sustainability approach is aligned to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Identifying material issues 8 Reporting against the SDGs most material to SSE’s Emerging trends 8 business can be found on the following pages of this Working for and with stakeholders 10 report: Group Principal Risks 12 Global frameworks and partnerships 13 Aligning to the UN's SDGs 15 The scope of this report is generally focused on performance data for the financial year ending 31 March 2020. However, the period between Taking meaningful climate action 16 SSE’s year end and the publication of this report was dominated by the Embedding climate action 19 coronavirus emergency and therefore some activities during this period Measuring performance 22 have also been included. Climate-related financial disclosure 24 On occasion the report refers to activities of SSE’s joint ventures and Protecting the natural environment 32 in these instances it is made clear that this is the case. For a full list of Managing environmental impacts 32 SSE’s subsidiary undertakings, partnerships, joint ventures and associates, Using resources efficiently 34 please refer to pages 252 to 259 of SSE’s Annual Report 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecast from 2016-17 to 2019-20
    Tariff Information Paper Forecast TNUoS tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20 This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. This annual publication is intended to show how tariffs may evolve over the next five years. The forecast tariffs for 2016/17 will be refined throughout the year. 28 January 2015 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................4 2. Five Year Tariff Forecast Tables ...............................................................5 2.1 Generation Tariffs ................................................................................. 5 2.2 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ..............................................................10 2.3 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs .......................................................12 Any Questions? 2.4 Offshore Local Tariffs .........................................................................12 2.5 Demand Tariffs ...................................................................................13 Contact: 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes................................................................14 Mary Owen 3.1 CMP213 (Project TransmiT)...............................................................14 Stuart Boyle 3.2 HVDC Circuits.....................................................................................14 3.3 Contracted Generation .......................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Networks Connections Update
    Transmission Networks Connections Update May 2015 SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO Back to Contents TNCU – May 2015 Page 01 Contents Foreword ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 02 1. Introduction /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 03 2. Connection timescales ///////////////////////////////////////////// 04 Illustrative connection timescales /////////////////////////////////////// 04 Connections by area /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 05 3. GB projects by year ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 06 Contracted overall position /////////////////////////////////////////////// 08 Renewable projects status by year ///////////////////////////////////// 10 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Excluding Nuclear /// 11 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Nuclear only ////////// 12 Interconnector projects status by year //////////////////////////////// 13 4. Additional data by transmission owner ///////////////////////// 14 National Grid Electricity Transmission plc //////////////////////////// 16 Scottish Hydro Electricity Transmission plc ////////////////////////// 18 Scottish Power Transmission Limited ///////////////////////////////// 20 5. Connection locations /////////////////////////////////////////////// 22 Northern Scotland projects map //////////////////////////////////////// 25 Southern Scotland projects map /////////////////////////////////////// 28 Northern England projects map /////////////////////////////////////////
    [Show full text]
  • Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report Zettrans May 2008
    Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report ZetTrans May 2008 Prepared by: ................................................ Approved by: ................................................. Joanne Casey Paul Finch Principal Consultant Associate Director Whalsay Rev No Comments Date 1 Draft for Client Review 02/05/08 2 Final following client comment 15/05/08 225 Bath Street, Glasgow, G2 4GZ Telephone: 0141 222 6400 Fax: 0141 222 6499 Website: http://www.fabermaunsell.com Job No 55280TABT/ WS601 Reference 11 May 2008 This document has been prepared by Faber Maunsell Limited (“Faber Maunsell”) for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between Faber Maunsell and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by Faber Maunsell, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of Faber Maunsell. f:\projects\55280tabt zetrans regional transport strategy development\ws 601 whalsay stag2\11\back up of final report\whalsay stag 2 final 080515.doc Faber Maunsell Whalsay Transport Link Executive Summary Introduction ZetTrans commissioned Faber Maunsell to undertake a detailed examination of options with regard to the transport link between Whalsay and the Shetland Mainland 1. The analysis follows Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG 2). This note summarises the STAG process undertaken in order to reach a preferred option to be considered for funding. The ‘Do Nothing’ option is considered to be unacceptable. Currently the route suffers capacity constraints at peak times which is reported to be hampering the commuter base of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Benefits from Offshore Renewable Energy Developments
    ScottIsh Government Good practIce prIncIples for CommunIty benefIts from Offshore renewable Energy developments 1 1 IntroductIon Scotland is estimated to have around a quarter of Europe’s potential offshore wind resources, and The Scottish Contents Government wishes to see communities across the country share in the benefits 1. Introduction 2. Principles from this rich natural resource. 3. Background 4. Designing a Community Benefit Package for Offshore Renewable Energy Projects The Scottish Government’s National Marine Plan While the majority of this document is intended to 5. Identification of Community (NMP) Renewables Policy 10 states that “Good be for developers of wind projects, it is proposed 6. Maximising Impact of Benefit Practice guidance for community benefit from that this document will be reviewed over the 7. Further Principles offshore wind and marine renewable energy coming years to incorporate guidance and good development should be followed by developers, practice for other offshore technologies. 8. Case Studies where appropriate”. This document looks at good 9. Further Reading practice in shaping and delivering community This document is split into definitions, context, 10. Glossary benefits from offshore renewable energy projects, good practice expectations and supplementary complementary to environmental, supply chain guidance for all involved. The intended readers of and other socio-economic benefits to Scotland. this document are developers, communities, local authorities and other stakeholders. When providing community benefits from offshore renewables, there are a number of factors to be The Scottish Government is committed to This document is available at: considered such as identifying the community, supporting the development of a successful www.localenergyscotland.org/goodpractice.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulberwick, Quarff & Cunningsburgh Community Council
    GULBERWICK, QUARFF & CUNNINGSBURGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL - MEETING ON TUESDAY 22 JANUARY 2013 IN THE CUNNINGSBURGH SCHOOL AT 7.30PM AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Approval of Minutes of Meeting held on Tuesday 27 November 2012* 3. Matters arising from Minutes 4. Police Report 5. Finance 6. Applications for Grants 7. Planning – Three wind Turbines, Freelight (Shetland) Ltd* Weekly list 8. Gulberwick Together 9. Refresh of the Blueprint for Education Update 10. Platform Shetland Ltd* 11. Review of Licensing* 12. AOCB 13. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 26 February 2013 *denotes papers attached GULBERWICK, QUARFF & CUNNINGSBURGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL 2 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012 IN THE CUNNINGSBURGH SCHOOL AT 7.30PM PRESENT Mr E MacPherson Mrs T Chivers Mr R G Feather Dr A Titheradge Mr J A Nicolson Mr A Ockendon Mr G Malcolmson Mr N Henderson Mrs L Johnston Mr I Jarmson EX OFFICIO Mr G Smith Mr B Fox Mr P Campbell Dr J Wills (part time) IN ATTENDANCE Phil Crossland Mrs J Clark CHAIRMAN Mr E MacPherson 1. APOLOGIES Mr C Smith Ms A Westlake 2. PHIL CROSSLAND, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, SIC Chairman welcomed Mr Crossland to the meeting. Mr Crossland began by explaining that there is a new approach to Shetland-wide budgets so a budget prioritisation programme has been implemented to identify how many services can be supported, i.e. transport and environmental services. Any capital spend across the whole SIC would come out of the budget. The rolling programme of proposed road works has disappeared and has been replaced by the Shetland-wide budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariff Information Paper
    Tariff Information Paper This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2017/18 to 2020/21. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. Together with the final tariffs for 2016/17 this publication shows how tariffs may evolve over the the next next five years. Forecast tariffs for 2017/18 will be refined throughout the year. 11 February 2016 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................. 4 2. Tariff Forecast Tables ............................................................................... 5 2.1 Generator Wider Tariffs ....................................................................... 5 2.2 Summary of generator wider tariffs from 2016/17 to 2020/21 ........... 11 2.3 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ............................................................. 12 Any Questions? 2.4 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs ...................................................... 14 2.5 Offshore Local Tariffs ........................................................................ 14 Contact: 2.6 Small Generator Discount ................................................................. 15 Mary Owen 2.7 Demand Tariffs.................................................................................. 15 2.8 Summary of Demand Tariffs.............................................................. 16 Stuart Boyle 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes............................................................... 17
    [Show full text]