DOCSLIB.ORG

Gulberwick, Quarff & Cunningsburgh Community Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gulberwick, Quarff & Cunningsburgh Community Council GULBERWICK, QUARFF & CUNNINGSBURGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL - MEETING ON TUESDAY 22 JANUARY 2013 IN THE CUNNINGSBURGH SCHOOL AT 7.30PM AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Approval of Minutes of Meeting held on Tuesday 27 November 2012* 3. Matters arising from Minutes 4. Police Report 5. Finance 6. Applications for Grants 7. Planning – Three wind Turbines, Freelight (Shetland) Ltd* Weekly list 8. Gulberwick Together 9. Refresh of the Blueprint for Education Update 10. Platform Shetland Ltd* 11. Review of Licensing* 12. AOCB 13. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 26 February 2013 *denotes papers attached GULBERWICK, QUARFF & CUNNINGSBURGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL 2 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 27 NOVEMBER 2012 IN THE CUNNINGSBURGH SCHOOL AT 7.30PM PRESENT Mr E MacPherson Mrs T Chivers Mr R G Feather Dr A Titheradge Mr J A Nicolson Mr A Ockendon Mr G Malcolmson Mr N Henderson Mrs L Johnston Mr I Jarmson EX OFFICIO Mr G Smith Mr B Fox Mr P Campbell Dr J Wills (part time) IN ATTENDANCE Phil Crossland Mrs J Clark CHAIRMAN Mr E MacPherson 1. APOLOGIES Mr C Smith Ms A Westlake 2. PHIL CROSSLAND, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, SIC Chairman welcomed Mr Crossland to the meeting. Mr Crossland began by explaining that there is a new approach to Shetland-wide budgets so a budget prioritisation programme has been implemented to identify how many services can be supported, i.e. transport and environmental services. Any capital spend across the whole SIC would come out of the budget. The rolling programme of proposed road works has disappeared and has been replaced by the Shetland-wide budget. There are 150 works requests on the Roads list and officials have to decide which jobs are deliverable within budget. Some jobs are cheap but some are very expensive, therefore, the priority at the moment is to maintain what we already have. All agreed that prioritisation of schemes should be open and transparent. It is desired to compile a priority list by 31 March 2013. This would help manage the expectations of the public. Quarff Road safety It is a remote reality that the Kjurkhul and Wester Quarff junction upgrade will happen in the next 5-10 years. At the previous meeting he attended it was suggested to put a 50mph speed limit in place. Both A & B Roads have been subject to a speed limit review and Quarff is consistent with the national policy so it is unlikely that the speed limit will be changed. However, Mr Crossland agreed to ask his officers to fill the puddle at the Wester Quarff junction and look at timber edging with a hardcore footpath. He will also ask his officers to look into a hard standing area for the buses to pull off the main road. The desired passing place on the Easter Quarff road is considered a new scheme but a low priority due to the road being straight with good visibility. Mr Crossland added that it is now SIC policy not to replace soft verges on side roads. Stunken Brae, Gulberwick It was stressed that the residents of Gulberwick saw the proposed improvement of Stunken Brae as an extremely urgent priority within the community. Mr Crossland advised the group that the estimated cost of the proposed improvement scheme at Stunken Brae is £180,000. The landowner is in dispute over the acquisition of the land. Members asked Phil Crossland to continue with the land acquisition so in the event of money becoming available the scheme could go ahead. Members asked if it would be possible to look at lower cost options for Stunken Brae. Mr Crossland replied by saying that road officers have reviewed the scheme and the existing road is delivering the minimum service. Any upgrade would be considered a new scheme. He stated that safety is not the only priority. Statistically the accident rate for the area is not high. Statistics are based on reported accidents which result in injury, not damage-only accidents. Members noted that the walkway at Langton Corner, Gulberwick, had been completed at a cost £32,000. It was felt that although it had been achieved at a high cost, the path is well used and much appreciated by residents. Cunningsburgh The desired barrier at Valleygarth, Aithsetter is considered major works as a barrier foundation would need to be laid. Suggestions It was noted that there is a lack of junction markings from Observatory to Cunningsburgh School. Perhaps cost effective reflective signs/markers could be beneficial. It was pointed out that not cutting grass verges in the summer may lead to decaying long grass which may allow more snow to build up thus creating an issue when it comes to road clearing in the winter. A member asked if it would be possible to do a good number of the cheap jobs which would reduce the number of jobs on the list. Mr Crossland responded by explaining that they have to look at how many people in Shetland would benefit by the improvements. A member asked if the proposal to spend £250,000 on the installation of an improved broadband connection would come out of the same Shetland-wide budget. If so, why is this being prioritised over a road safety issue at Gulberwick? Councillor Wills responded by saying that the broadband connection would be an enormous benefit the whole of Shetland and support education and many other services. Councillor George Smith advised the group that the SIC councillors are currently attending a series of seminars which is giving a total picture of achieving a saving of £30m. It is hoped that the public will rethink their priorities when they realise the implications of the proposed cuts and reduce the significance of the current discussions. Chairman thanks Mr Crossland for attending the meeting. Phil Crossland confirmed that a formal report would be sent to Mrs Clark summarising the main points of the meeting. ***Phil Crossland left the meeting at 8.30pm*** 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 6 November 2012 were approved on the motion of Mr A Ockendon and Mrs T Chivers. 4. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE PREVIOUS MINUTES . Shurton Brae Bypass A letter dated 1 November 2012 from Roads to a Gulberwick resident had been circulated to members and was noted. Some remedial works will be carried out in the area. Gulberwick Playpark Gates An email dated 15 November 2012 from Ian Smith, Roads, was read and noted. The gates are on order and will be erected as soon as possible. Langton Corner, Timber Footpath An email dated 14 November 2012 from Ian Smith, Roads, had been circulated to members and was noted. 5. POLICE REPORT Nothing to report. 6. FINANCE Mrs Clark verbally reported on the finances of the Community Council. The current bank balance is £8,630.30. 7. APPLICATION FOR GRANTS A letter dated 14 November 2012 from Sita Goudie, Shetland Amenity Trust, had been circulated to members. Attached to the letter was a list of the groups that had participated in the Redd Up. Members agreed to donate £50 to each group from the Environmental Services budget. They are as follows: Cunningsburgh Football Club – running costs Cunningsburgh Primary School - to purchase dictionaries Fladdabister & Ocraquoy Settlement Design Statement Supporters – running costs Gulberwick Community Hall – running costs Gulberwick Together – community events Hillhead Group – Juvenile Diabetes Shetland Quarff Scaffies – Lerwick & Bressay Parish Church Quarff Youth Club – running costs Shetland Under 16s Football Club – running costs Wester Quarff Residents – Shetland Aid Trust Voxter Corner – Hillswick Wildlife Santuary 8. PLANNING . Weekly Lists a) An application dated 14 November 2012 to create a residential development comprising of detached houses, apartments and development sites for individual dwellings with associated services and infrastructure. On inspection of a copy of the application form it was noted that 16 dwelling houses are proposed. Referring to the proposed Local Development Plan it was noted that the site had already been proposed for development but there may be issues with draining and sewerage. Members agreed that although they did not object to the application they have major concerns regarding the Stunken Brae area of road which is particularly hazardous in winter conditions. The following issues were also highlighted: . Existing road infrastructure is inadequate for the existing properties . Junction signage in the area is poor . Existing sewer is running at capacity . Area of land may have draining issues (as noted in the Proposed Local Development Plan) Mrs Clark to respond accordingly. b) An application dated 16 November 2012, by Mr M Bain, to erect a garden shed at Mendoza, Cunningsburgh is pending consideration. There were no comments on this item. 9. GULBERWICK TOGETHER It was reported that Gulberwick Together are considering applying for a Climate Challenge Fund Grant to help pay for a cycle path with the aim of reducing the carbon footprint of the residents of Gulberwick. 10. GULBERWICK BAD WEATHER CONTINGENCY PLAN Nothing to report 11. REFRESH OF THE BLUEPRINT FOR EDUCATION UPDATE Councillor George Smith gave an update on the issue. He explained that there are two elements to the budget decision. The first element being the reduction of the school estate which will be implemented from school years 2014/2015 to 2016/2017. The second element being the reduction of classroom resources, including staffing, some of which has already been implemented from school year 2012/2013. It was noted that if schools are kept open there will be less resources in them. It is the desire of Councillors to maintain the quality of education. The proposed new Anderson High School would be funded by 1/3 SIC, 2/3 Scottish Government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Layout 1 Copy
    STACK ROCK 2020 An illustrated guide to sea stack climbing in the UK & Ireland - Old Harry - - Old Man of Stoer - - Am Buachaille - - The Maiden - - The Old Man of Hoy - - over 200 more - Edition I - version 1 - 13th March 1994. Web Edition - version 1 - December 1996. Web Edition - version 2 - January 1998. Edition 2 - version 3 - January 2002. Edition 3 - version 1 - May 2019. Edition 4 - version 1 - January 2020. Compiler Chris Mellor, 4 Barnfield Avenue, Shirley, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 8SE. Tel: 0208 662 1176 – E-mail: [email protected]. Send in amendments, corrections and queries by e-mail. ISBN - 1-899098-05-4 Acknowledgements Denis Crampton for enduring several discussions in which the concept of this book was developed. Also Duncan Hornby for information on Dorset’s Old Harry stacks and Mick Fowler for much help with some of his southern and northern stack attacks. Mike Vetterlein contributed indirectly as have Rick Cummins of Rock Addiction, Rab Anderson and Bruce Kerr. Andy Long from Lerwick, Shetland. has contributed directly with a lot of the hard information about Shetland. Thanks are also due to Margaret of the Alpine Club library for assistance in looking up old journals. In late 1996 Ben Linton, Ed Lynch-Bell and Ian Brodrick undertook the mammoth scanning and OCR exercise needed to transfer the paper text back into computer form after the original electronic version was lost in a disk crash. This was done in order to create a world-wide web version of the guide. Mike Caine of the Manx Fell and Rock Club then helped with route information from his Manx climbing web site.
    [Show full text]
  • Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report Zettrans May 2008
    Whalsay Transport Link STAG Report ZetTrans May 2008 Prepared by: ................................................ Approved by: ................................................. Joanne Casey Paul Finch Principal Consultant Associate Director Whalsay Rev No Comments Date 1 Draft for Client Review 02/05/08 2 Final following client comment 15/05/08 225 Bath Street, Glasgow, G2 4GZ Telephone: 0141 222 6400 Fax: 0141 222 6499 Website: http://www.fabermaunsell.com Job No 55280TABT/ WS601 Reference 11 May 2008 This document has been prepared by Faber Maunsell Limited (“Faber Maunsell”) for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between Faber Maunsell and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by Faber Maunsell, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of Faber Maunsell. f:\projects\55280tabt zetrans regional transport strategy development\ws 601 whalsay stag2\11\back up of final report\whalsay stag 2 final 080515.doc Faber Maunsell Whalsay Transport Link Executive Summary Introduction ZetTrans commissioned Faber Maunsell to undertake a detailed examination of options with regard to the transport link between Whalsay and the Shetland Mainland 1. The analysis follows Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG 2). This note summarises the STAG process undertaken in order to reach a preferred option to be considered for funding. The ‘Do Nothing’ option is considered to be unacceptable. Currently the route suffers capacity constraints at peak times which is reported to be hampering the commuter base of the island.
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland Mainland Central and South (Potentially Vulnerable Area 04/03)
    Shetland Mainland Central and South (Potentially Vulnerable Area 04/03) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment Shetland Shetland Islands Council Shetland coastal Summary of flooding impacts Summary of flooding impacts flooding of Summary At risk of flooding • <10 residential properties • 10 non-residential properties • £43,000 Annual Average Damages (damages by flood source shown left) Summary of objectives to manage flooding Objectives have been set by SEPA and agreed with flood risk management authorities. These are the aims for managing local flood risk. The objectives have been grouped in three main ways: by reducing risk, avoiding increasing risk or accepting risk by maintaining current levels of management. Objectives Many organisations, such as Scottish Water and energy companies, actively maintain and manage their own assets including their risk from flooding. Where known, these actions are described here. Scottish Natural Heritage and Historic Environment Scotland work with site owners to manage flooding where appropriate at designated environmental and/or cultural heritage sites. These actions are not detailed further in the Flood Risk Management Strategies. Summary of actions to manage flooding The actions below have been selected to manage flood risk. Flood Natural flood New flood Community Property level Site protection protection management warning flood action protection plans scheme/works works groups scheme Actions Flood Natural flood Maintain flood Awareness Surface water Emergency protection management warning
    [Show full text]
  • Jan-Robert Riise Governance & Law Director of Corporate Services: Christine Ferguson Corporate Services Department Montfield, Lerwick Shetland, ZE1 0LA
    Shetland Islands Council Executive Manager: Jan-Robert Riise Governance & Law Director of Corporate Services: Christine Ferguson Corporate Services Department Montfield, Lerwick Shetland, ZE1 0LA Telephone: 01595 744550 Fax: 01595 744585 [email protected] www.shetland.gov.uk If calling please ask for Louise Adamson Direct Dial: 01595 744555 Email: [email protected] Date: 6 February 2019 Dear Sir/Madam You are invited to the following meeting: Planning Committee Council Chamber, Town Hall, Lerwick Wednesday 13 February 2019 at 2pm Apologies for absence should be notified to Louise Adamson at the above number. Yours faithfully Executive Manager – Governance and Law Chair: Mr T Smith Vice-Chair: Ms A Manson AGENDA (a) Hold circular calling the meeting as read. (b) Apologies for absence, if any. (c) Declarations of Interest – Members are asked to consider whether they have an interest to declare in relation to any item on the agenda for this meeting. Any Member making a declaration of interest should indicate whether it is a financial or non-financial interest and include some information on the nature of the interest. Advice may be sought from Officers prior to the meeting taking place. (d) Confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 8 October 2018, enclosed. - 1 - Items 1. 2018/335/ECUCON - To vary the consent by increasing the maximum tip height of the turbines from 145 metres (m) to a maximum of 155 m and increasing the maximum rotor diameter of the turbines by 10 m to a maximum of 120 m. The installed capacity of the proposed generating stated would be greater than 50 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • North Roe Church, North Roe, Shetland, ZE2 9RY ZE2 Shetland, Roe, North Church, Roe North
    North Roe Church, North Roe, Shetland, ZE2 9RY ZE2 Shetland, Roe, North Church, Roe North Viewing Arrangements By appointment with The Church of Scotland Law Department on 0131 240 2263. Offers Offers are invited and should be submitted in writing, through a Scottish solicitor, to:- Church of Scotland Law Department 121 George Street Edinburgh EH2 4YN Telephone 0131 240 2263 Fax 0131 240 2246 Email: [email protected] It is possible that a closing date for offers will be fixed and, to ensure that they receive intimation of this, prospective purchasers must formally intim- ate their interest, via a Scottish solicitor, in writing or by Email with the Law Department. As offers will require to be considered by one or more Church Committees, they should not be subject to short time limits for acceptance. The sellers do not bind themselves to accept the highest or any of the offers they receive. Whilst the foregoing particulars are believed to be correct they are not war- ranted on the part of the sellers and prospective purchasers will require to satisfy themselves with regards to all matters prior to offers. The Trustees of Northmavine Parish Church of Scotland-Scottish Charity No SC002341 Property Simple country stone built church dated from 1870 located in North Roe, Shetland. North Roe is a protected area at the northern tip of the mainland of Shetland. The church is set within the open Shetland landscape and benefits for glorious sea views. Accommodation The accommodation comprises a front entrance vestibule with accessible toilet to the left and vestry to the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland Local Development Plan Examination Report
    Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals REPORT TO SHETLAND ISLANDS COUNCIL SHETLAND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXAMINATION Reporters: Mr David N Gordon BSc(Hons) MSc MRTPI Mr Ronald W Jackson LLB Date of Report: 13 June 2014 CONTENTS Page No Examination of Conformity with Participation Statement 1 Issue Page No A1 Areas of Best Fit 4 A2 Areas of Best Fit 8 AL1 Good Agricultural 10 AP1 Delivery of Sites 16 C1 Status of Marine Spatial Plan 18 C2 CST1 – Coastal Development 20 ED1 Commercial and Business Developments 23 ED3 Setterness, detrimental impact to Lerwick Town Centre 26 ED4 Sites with Development Potential 28 GP1 General Requirements for All Developments 31 GP2 Use of Low and Zero Carbon Generating Technologies (LZCGT) 33 GP3 Biodiversity Geodiversity 35 GP5 All Development Layout and Design 37 GP6 Sustainable Development 39 GP8 General Policy 3 Wording 42 GP9 View Point at Staney Hill 43 GP10 General Policy 2 Grammar 45 H1 HNDA and Land Supply 47 H2 Housing Policy 57 M1 Minerals 59 M2 Minerals 63 NH1 Natural Heritage 66 NH4 Soils 69 NH5 Geodiversity 71 NH6 Policy NH7 – Water Environment Comments 73 NH7 Local Natural Designations 75 NH8 Policy NH7 – Water Environment 77 RE1 Policy RE1 - Renewable Energy 79 RE2 Spatial Framework for Windfarms 81 RE3 Impacts on Recreational sites by renewable energy developments 83 RE4 Policy gaps on renewable energy in Local Development Plan 86 SD1 Deliverability of Sites 88 T1 Policy Trans1 – Integrated Transport 91 T3 Policy wording TRANS1 – Integrated Transport 93 WD2 Policy WD2 - Wastewater
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4.1 Section 36 Variation Application Criteria for Landscape and Visual Appraisal
    Viking Wind Farm Technical Appendix 4.1 Section 36 Variation Application Criteria for Landscape and Visual Appraisal TECHNICAL APPENDIX 4.1: CRITERIA FOR LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL APPRAISAL 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This technical appendix details the various criteria and definitions which have been used for Landscape and Visual Appraisal (LVA) of the consented Viking Wind Farm and proposed varied development (comprising the variation of 10 m increase in turbine tip height and increased rotor diameter of up to 120 m). Assessment Guidance 1.1.2 The LVAs have been carried out in accordance with best practice guidance, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Assessment (Third Edition) (GLVIA3). 1.1.3 Whilst criteria are provided, the allocation of these to various landscape areas and visual receptors and application of potential effect ratings has been undertaken using professional judgement. All criteria given should be considered as points on a continuum. 1.2 Landscape Appraisal Landscape Value 1.2.1 The relative value of the landscape is an important consideration in informing judgement of the significance of effects. Value concerns the perceived importance of the landscape, when considered as a whole and within the context of the study area. Landscape Value is established through consideration of the following factors: • Presence of landscape designations, other inventory or registered landscapes/landscape features or identified planning constraints; • The scenic quality of the landscape; • Perceptual aspects such as wildness or tranquillity; • Conservation interests such as cultural heritage features or associations, or if the landscape supports notable habitats or species; • Recreational value; and • Rarity, either in the national or local context, or if it is considered to be a particularly important example of a specific landscape type.
    [Show full text]
  • Shetland Wool Week 2019
    28 SEP – 6 OCT 2019 www.shetlandwoolweek.com /shetlandwoolweek @ShetlandWoolWk /shetlandwoolweek WELCOME TO SHETLAND WOOL WEEK 2019 e are thrilled to be celebrating ten years There will be crofting tours available every day, of Shetland Wool Week. When we look and, for the first time, the Shetland Flock Book W back and reflect on how the event has Society will be hosting tours, giving people the developed over the years into the international opportunity to visit stunning locations at Vementry festival that we see today, we are overwhelmed by and Lunna. We are excited to also offer tours to the its success. remote islands of Fair Isle and Foula: a very special Shetland Wool Week is very much driven by experience. community and local involvement. Over the last Many community halls will be hosting exhibitions, 10 years we have seen the wider Shetland textile demonstrations, and drop-in events as well as community come together to celebrate and offering their famous ‘teas’. There are more evening promote our sheep, our textile industry and our and social events too, which include a quiz night, crofting, which touch on so many different facets of guided walks, films, music and food. Shetland wool. Shetland Wool Week is an extraordinary event. It is Our tenth programme is bigger than ever with a real somewhere to learn and develop new skills, share emphasis on Shetland wool and the people who knowledge, socialise and meet with friends old and make it happen. As always, the programme aims to new, whilst also providing a space to slow down, deliver a truly authentic Shetland experience with a think, and breathe and explore the natural wonders wide range of exhibitions, classes, events, tours and of our beautiful islands.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Volume 1)
    Durham E-Theses Phytosociological studies in the southern Isles of Shetland Hilliam, Judith How to cite: Hilliam, Judith (1977) Phytosociological studies in the southern Isles of Shetland, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9637/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Phytosociological Studies in the Southern Isles of Shetland By Judith Hilliam (B.Sc. Dunelm) A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Durham Department of Botany March 1977 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived /S^^^^f^^?^"*''^ from it should be acknowledged. ( 1 2 APR 1978 j The fieldwork for this project was carried out with Anne M.Lewis, who was studying the vegetation of the Northern Islands of Shetland, but the content of this thesis is entirely my own work, except for the text references to publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Soil and Water
    VIKING WIND FARM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 1 4 . SOIL AND WATER 14.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses the effects of the proposed Viking Wind Farm on soil and water. The assessment was undertaken by Mouchel’s water and environmental consultancy team. Soil and water are closely linked resources with the possibility of common effects. For the purposes of this assessment, ‘soil’ is considered to include mineral soil, peat and drift deposits. ‘Water’ is considered to include surface water and ground water. Effects on soil and water may result in secondary ecological effects on habitats (e.g. peatland) or species (e.g. fish). Such potential effects are considered fully in the Non- avian Ecology section, Chapter 10. The assessment is supported by additional information in the following appendices. • Appendix 14.1 Peat Stability Assessment; • Appendix 14.2 Borrow Pit Assessment; • Appendix 14.3 Stream Crossing Guidance; • Appendix 14.4 Estimated Peat Extraction Volumes and Potential Reuse; • Appendix 14.5 Hydrochemistry Survey; • Appendix 14.6 Framework Site Environmental Management Plan / Pollution Prevention Planning; • Appendix 14.7 Framework Site Waste Management Plan. Soil and water considerations have influenced the design of the proposed development, and these issues are discussed in the applicable appendices. 14.2 SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT 14.2.1 Project interactions During construction there will be physical disturbance and removal of soil by mobile plant. The wind farm and related infrastructure will introduce physical changes, which may alter the hydrological characteristics of the site. During the construction phase, and to a lesser extent during operation, potential sources of pollution will be present on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management Plan 2016-2022: Interim Report
    Shetland Local Flood Risk Management Plan 2016-2022: Interim Report Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009: Shetland Local Plan District Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan 1 Published by: Shetland Islands Council Shetland Local Flood Risk Management Plan 2016-2022: Interim Report Publication date: 8th March 2019 Terms and conditions Ownership: All intellectual property rights for the Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan are owned by Shetland Islands Council, SEPA or its licensors. The Interim Report Local Flood Risk Management Plan cannot be used for or related to any commercial, business or other income generating purpose or activity, nor by value added resellers. You must not copy, assign, transfer, distribute, modify, create derived products or reverse engineer the Interim Report Local - Flood Risk Management Plan in any way except where previously agreed with Shetland Islands Council or SEPA. Your use of the Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan must not be detrimental to Shetland Islands Council or SEPA or other responsible authority, its activities or the environment. Warranties and Indemnities: All reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan is accurate for its intended purpose, no warranty is given by Shetland Islands Council or SEPA in this regard. Whilst all reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan are up to date, complete and accurate at the time of publication, no guarantee is given in this regard and ultimate responsibility lies with you to validate any information given. Shetland Islands Council or SEPA will not be responsible if the information contained in the Interim Report - Local Flood Risk Management Plan are misinterpreted or misused by you.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009
    Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009: Shetland Local Plan District Local Flood Risk Management Plan Published by: Shetland Islands Council Delivering sustainable flood risk management is important for Scotland’s continued economic success and well-being. It is essential that we avoid and reduce the risk of flooding, and prepare and protect ourselves and our communities. This is the first local flood risk management plan for the Shetland Local Plan District, describing the actions which will make a real difference to managing the risk of flooding and recovering from any future flood events. The task now for us – Shetland Islands Council, Scottish Water, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), the Scottish Government and all other Responsible Authorities and public bodies – is to turn our plan into action. Shetland Islands Council Local Flood Risk Management Plan 2016 1 Foreword The impacts of flooding experienced by individuals, communities and businesses can be devastating and long lasting. It is vital that we continue to reduce the risk of any such future events and improve Scotland’s ability to manage and recover from any events which do occur. The publication of this Plan is an important milestone in implementing the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009 and improving how we cope with and manage floods in the Shetland Local Plan District. The Plan translates this legislation into actions to reduce the damage and distress caused by flooding over the first planning cycle from 2016 to 2022. The Plan has been developed by the Shetland Local Plan District Partnership, which is comprised of the Shetland Islands Council, Scottish Water and SEPA.
    [Show full text]