Reconsidering Scholasticism Howard P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconsidering Scholasticism Howard P Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 9-24-1999 Reconsidering Scholasticism Howard P. Kainz Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. National Catholic Reporter, Vol. 35, No. 41 (September 24, 1999): 19-21. Publisher link. © 1999 National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company. Used with permission. Reconsidering scholasticism Kainz, Howard National Catholic Reporter; Sep 24, 1999; 35, 41; ProQuest Central pg. 19 .J.' Colleges and Universities September 24, 1999 National Catholic Reporter 19 cism, he preferred the speculative Catholic approach to theology over the Protestant approach. Or - a less pleasant thought - Rec the ecclesiastical authorities just didn't understand what Hegel was up to. This was the era of major change in the ·;;@it'··• church and the heady enthusiasm of the .J· .... Vatican. Many ecclesiastical and theologi­ cal reforms were agreed upon at the Second Vatican Council and began to be imple­ Though rigid, Catholic philosophy before the council wasn't all bad mented in dioceses around the world; but also, around the same time, for some rea­ By HOWARD KAINZ son, changes began to be made in philoso­ phy departments. No directive from Vati­ 'Aphilosophy major in a Catholic can II ever said, "Wean the Catholic phi­ college during the '50s would losophy departments away from Scholasti­ very likely be able to identify cism." But gradually and almost impercep­ with my experiences. My 36 tibly something like a weaning did take hours of the courses required place. for the major consisted largely of the vari­ Away from ous branches of Scholastic philosophy - 1bomism formal and material logic, epistemology, Possibly the Papal Encyclical, Humanae cosmology, ontology, rational psychology, Vitae, with its controversial invocation of general and special ethics and a special Thomistic natural law against artificial con­ course entitled "Thomistic synthesis." traception, turned many away from These courses were highly systematic and Thomism as the official Catholic philoso­ basically concerned with presenting - for phy/theology and helped to instill doubts want of a better name- "the truth." Every about papal authority. Possibly the rising once in a while, the teacher would stop to interest in the ecumenical movement - engage in in-house disputes with other another result of Vatican II- and the felt Scholastics - criticizing the Scotists for necessity of avoiding theological ghettoism their nominalism, or Suarezians for their led to the desire to investigate all and cavalier attitude toward the distinction sundry philosophical schools of thought. between essence and existence, and so on In any case, there was a definite movement -but these debates were more or less ami­ away from the predominately Scholastic cable. Less amicable were the timely refu­ curriculum. tations of the skepticisms of Rene Descartes At the present time, only a few Catholic and Immanuel Kant, or the rebuttals of the universities or colleges have a curriculum of empiricists and their mistakes about induc­ that type. There are, of course, offerings of tion, or the discrediting of the idealism of logic, ethics, metaphysics, and so on, in Bishop George Berkeley, and so forth. above a 3.0, even with the 'C.' He replied, and eventually started work on a master's Catholic colleges; but the content of these At graduation I felt I was fairly up-to-date "Oh, was I the only bastard?"- Apparent­ thesis on Thomistic angelology. To make courses often bears little resemblance to the on the important developments in the ly he hadn-J even looked at my other ends meet, I took a part-time teaching job Scholastic prototypes. philosophical world and decided to apply grades but just presumed that because of at Maryville College in the vicinity of St. If we examine larger patterns regarding for graduate study at the University of Cal­ my Thomistic background I wouldn't be Louis, and after choosing the books to be the evolution of philosophy departments ifornia, Los Angeles. As I was signing up for able to "cut the mustard." assigned for the semester was told by the in Catholic colleges, the main movement, courses, the chairman of the UCLA philos­ This incident made me aware of the prej­ dean that I had to get the bishop's permis­ starting in the '60s and continuing through ophy department, who had looked at my udice that then prevailed about what "goes sion to use some of these texts. I had the '70s, seems to have been toward "the transcripts, took me aside and warned me on" in a philosophy department in a assigned some texts frqm Immanuel Kant, history of philosophy." There are some that, as a "Thomist," I was going to have Catholic university. Remnants of this prej­ and many of the writings of Immanuel exceptions: Notre Dame gravitated toward difficulty in their graduate program. But I udice still remain. The stereotype of a Kant were on the Index Librorum Prohibito­ "mainstream" analytic philosophy, was optimistic and even signed up for his Catholic philosophy department was, and rum. A letter of permission from the bishop Duquesne University toward contemporary course on the Theory of Knowledge, which often still is, the image-of a veritable ratio­ was required, and the permission could Continental philosophy, and a few had to do largely with "raw feels" and how nal armory at the service of religious dogma then be extended to all of one's students. Catholic colleges and universities like we know the real exist~nce of pieces of and the papal chain of command. At any In recent years, out of curiosity I bor­ Aquinas College and the University of Dal­ chalk and other things in- the real world. rate, I wasn't sure that I was all that inter­ rowed the now-defunct Index from our las remained and still remain Thomistical­ At the end of the semester, he<:alled me ested in continuing in philosophy at that library; and discovered that Kant was ly oriented. into his office, told me that I had a 'C' for time and decided to travel to Africa and roundly disapproved of by the ecclesiasti­ But I have some problems understanding the course in spite of what I thought was an other countries. for a couple years to see cal authorities. I was delighted to note, the resort to history. What is the cash-value excellent paper on "Retrocognition," and what the world outside California was real­ however, that one of my favorite philoso­ for a Catholic college in "specializing" in that I would have to leave the program or ly like. phers, Hegel, was completely absent from the history of philosophy? Is this, for all be put on probation. I did some quick cal­ When I returned from my travels, I the Index ofForbidden Books. Possibly some­ practical purposes, just a variation of cur­ culations and then asked him whether my · entered the graduate program at St. Louis one at the curia in the 19th century knew ricula in the "history of ideas"? Are all grade point average wouldn't still be well University, which was largely Thomistic, that, although Hegel was critical of Catholi- Continued on page 20 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ~---- -~---- ---------------------~ -- - -- Colleges and Universities 20 National Catholic Reporter September 24, 1999 clarity for his own position. The formalistic Scholasticism I Problems in the resort to history Videtur quods and sed contras and respondeo dicendum quods of medieval Scholasticism CONnNUED FROM PAGE 19 ty. So why should we think seriously about from mine, but I would include on my list are no longer in style, but there are other philosophies, and all ideas, to be consid­ metaphysical issues any more, except per­ Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz, Friedrich Wil­ ways to unite history with systematic anal­ ered? And how does one avoid eclecticism haps to refute their possibility or to castigate helm Schelling, Hegel, Seren Kierkegaard, ysis of issues. In modem philosophy, Hegel, in the choices of historical concentrations? dogmatic positions on these.issues? (Possibly Gabriel Marcel and Max Scheler. But for the who maintained that there was one system Certainly there are some downsides to language-analysis, like an island in the majority, the "handwriting on the wall" of philosophy unfolding in and through the this approach. For one thing, there is the stormy sea, presents itself to us as a safer seems to be to combine history with system­ history of philosophy, offers us the best danger of becoming a mere historian. Also, approach; at least Kant didn't say we couldn't atic criticism. 19th century example of the unification of if there is a graduate department, it is con­ know anything about our own language.) Does one who presents Kant's criticisms system and history. In recent decades, ceivable that we could end up training the tip of the of the arguments for the exis- Richard Rorty's Philosophy and graduate students to become historians, Kant iceberg tence of God really want to the Mirror of Nature and Alas­ rather than "doing" philosophy. In other But Kant is just "the tip of the iceberg." leave it at that, schedule a dair Macintyre's After Virtue words, a graduate student, depending on What about Nietzsche? Should we just try quiz and then go on to the Does one who also give us some excellent the choice of courses and the makeup of to take him with the proverbial"grain of next item on the syllabus? presents Kant's examples of the way that deep his/her dissertation committee, could quite salt"? But if we discerned his true meaning, Does one who analyzes jean examination of philosophical conceivably·receive a Ph.D.
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Augustine and the Doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ Stanislaus J
    ST. AUGUSTINE AND THE DOCTRINE OF THE MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST STANISLAUS J. GRABOWSKI, S.T.D., S.T.M. Catholic University of America N THE present article a study will be made of Saint Augustine's doc­ I trine of the Mystical Body of Christ. This subject is, as it will be later pointed out, timely and fruitful. It is of unutterable importance for the proper and full conception of the Church. This study may be conveniently divided into four parts: (I) A fuller consideration of the doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ, as it is found in the works of the great Bishop of Hippo; (II) a brief study of that same doctrine, as it is found in the sources which the Saint utilized; (III) a scrutiny of the place that this doctrine holds in the whole system of his religious thought and of some of its peculiarities; (IV) some consideration of the influence that Saint Augustine exercised on the development of this particular doctrine in theologians and doctrinal systems. THE DOCTRINE St. Augustine gives utterance in many passages, as the occasion de­ mands, to words, expressions, and sentences from which we are able to infer that the Church of his time was a Church of sacramental rites and a hierarchical order. Further, writing especially against Donatism, he is led Xo portray the Church concretely in its historical, geographical, visible form, characterized by manifest traits through which she may be recognized and discerned from false chuiches. The aspect, however, of the concept of the Church which he cherished most fondly and which he never seems tired of teaching, repeating, emphasizing, and expound­ ing to his listeners is the Church considered as the Body of Christ.1 1 On St.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine De Chandieu (1534-1591): One of the Fathers Of
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): ONE OF THE FATHERS OF REFORMED SCHOLASTICISM? A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546-4301 800388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu. This dissertation entitled ANTOINE DE CHANDIEU (1534-1591): L'UN DES PERES DE LA SCHOLASTIQUE REFORMEE? written by THEODORE GERARD VAN RAALTE and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: Richard A. Muller, Ph.D. I Date ~ 4 ,,?tJ/3 Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Theodore G. (Ted) Van Raalte All rights reserved For Christine CONTENTS Preface .................................................................................................................. viii Abstract ................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1 Introduction: Historiography and Scholastic Method Introduction .............................................................................................................1 State of Research on Chandieu ...............................................................................6 Published Research on Chandieu’s Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Life with Augustine
    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SCHOLASTIC PERIOD Beatus Rhenanus, a Close Friend Of
    CHAPTER THREE MEDIEVAL HISTORY: THE SCHOLASTIC PERIOD Beatus Rhenanus, a close friend of Erasmus and the most famous humanist historian of Germany, dated the rise of scholasticism (and hence the decay of theology) at “around the year of grace 1140”, when men like Peter Lombard (1095/1100–1160), Peter Abelard (1079–1142), and Gratian († c. 1150) were active.1 Erasmus, who cared relatively little about chronology, never gave such a precise indication, but one may assume that he did not disagree with Beatus, whose views may have directly influenced him. As we have seen, he believed that the fervour of the gospel had grown cold among most Christians during the previous four hundred years.2 Although his statement pertained to public morality rather than to theology,3 other passages from his work confirm that in Erasmus’ eyes those four centuries represented the age of scholasticism. In his biography of Jerome, he complained that for the scholastics nobody “who had lived before the last four hundred years” was a theologian,4 and in a work against Noël Bédier he pointed to a tradition of “four hun- dred years during which scholastic theology, gravely burdened by the decrees of the philosophers and the contrivances of the sophists, has wielded its reign”.5 In one other case he assigned to scholasti- cism a tradition of three centuries.6 Thus by the second half of the twelfth century, Western Christendom, in Erasmus’ conception, had entered the most distressing phase of its history, even though the 1 See John F. D’Amico, “Beatus Rhenanus, Tertullian and the Reformation: A Humanist’s Critique of Scholasticism”, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 71 (1980), 37–63 esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Early Biblical Translations
    * * * * * * * Three Early Biblical Translations We do not have any of the original manuscripts of the books that have been included in the Bible. All we have is copies of copies. Most of the original manuscripts of the Old Testament were written in Hebrew, although a few chapters of Ezra and Daniel were recorded in Aramaic, the language of Jesus. The books of the New Testament were first written in Greek. The first translations of the Bible were of the Hebrew Bible. The Septuagint (SEP-too-a-jint) was a Greek translation written about three centuries before the birth of Christ. Two other early translations, composed after the birth of Christ, were the Peshitta in Syriac and the Vulgate in Latin. These three translations, the Septuagint, Peshitta, and Vulgate became the official translations of the Old Testament for the Greek-, Syriac-, and Latin-speaking churches respectively. Each also became the basis for other translations of the Bible. The Septuagint The Septuagint (from the Latin word septuaginta meaning seventy) was a Greek version of the Bible created during the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (ca. 285-246 BCE) in Alexandria, Egypt for Diaspora Jews. Most of Jews living outside of Palestine were Greek-speaking as a result of Alexander the Great's (357-323 BCE) campaign to Hellenize his empire. First verses of Genesis (click for larger picture) At first, the Septuagint (LXX) consisted only of the Pentateuch (Torah, first five books of the Bible). Different books were translated from the Hebrew over a span of two centuries, including the books of the Apocrypha, and were added to the LXX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Etienne Gilson Series 21
    The Etienne Gilson Series 21 Remapping Scholasticism by MARCIA L. COLISH 3 March 2000 Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies This lecture and its publication was made possible through the generous bequest of the late Charles J. Sullivan (1914-1999) Note: the author may be contacted at: Department of History Oberlin College Oberlin OH USA 44074 ISSN 0-708-319X ISBN 0-88844-721-3 © 2000 by Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 59 Queen’s Park Crescent East Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C4 Printed in Canada nce upon a time there were two competing story-lines for medieval intellectual history, each writing a major role for scholasticism into its script. Although these story-lines were O created independently and reflected different concerns, they sometimes overlapped and gave each other aid and comfort. Both exerted considerable influence on the way historians of medieval speculative thought conceptualized their subject in the first half of the twentieth cen- tury. Both versions of the map drawn by these two sets of cartographers illustrated what Wallace K. Ferguson later described as “the revolt of the medievalists.”1 One was confined largely to the academy and appealed to a wide variety of medievalists, while the other had a somewhat narrower draw and reflected political and confessional, as well as academic, concerns. The first was the anti-Burckhardtian effort to push Renaissance humanism, understood as combining a knowledge and love of the classics with “the discovery of the world and of man,” back into the Middle Ages. The second was inspired by the neo-Thomist revival launched by Pope Leo XIII, and was inhabited almost exclusively by Roman Catholic scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • John Duns Scotus's Metaphysics of Goodness
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 11-16-2015 John Duns Scotus’s Metaphysics of Goodness: Adventures in 13th-Century Metaethics Jeffrey W. Steele University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Medieval History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Scholar Commons Citation Steele, Jeffrey W., "John Duns Scotus’s Metaphysics of Goodness: Adventures in 13th-Century Metaethics" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6029 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John Duns Scotus’s Metaphysics of Goodness: Adventures in 13 th -Century Metaethics by Jeffrey Steele A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Colin Heydt, Ph.D. Joanne Waugh, Ph.D Date of Approval: November 12, 2015 Keywords: Medieval Philosophy, Transcendentals, Being, Aquinas Copyright © 2015, Jeffrey Steele DEDICATION To the wife of my youth, who with patience and long-suffering endured much so that I might gain a little knowledge. And to God, fons de bonitatis . She encouraged me; he sustained me. Both have blessed me. “O taste and see that the LORD is good; How blessed is the man who takes refuge in Him!!” --Psalm 34:8 “You are the boundless good, communicating your rays of goodness so generously, and as the most lovable being of all, every single being in its own way returns to you as its ultimate end.” –John Duns Scotus, De Primo Principio Soli Deo Gloria .
    [Show full text]
  • MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES to MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences Of
    MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Matthew Glen Minix UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2016 MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew G. APPROVED BY: _____________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Dissertation Director _____________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader. _____________________________________ Anthony Burke Smith, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ John A. Inglis, Ph.D. Dissertation Reader _____________________________________ Jack J. Bauer, Ph.D. _____________________________________ Daniel Speed Thompson, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Religious Studies ii © Copyright by Matthew Glen Minix All rights reserved 2016 iii ABSTRACT MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY NEO-THOMIST APPROACHES TO MODERN PSYCHOLOGY Name: Minix, Matthew Glen University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation considers a spectrum of five distinct approaches that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomist Catholic thinkers utilized when engaging with the tradition of modern scientific psychology: a critical approach, a reformulation approach, a synthetic approach, a particular [Jungian] approach, and a personalist approach. This work argues that mid-twentieth century neo-Thomists were essentially united in their concerns about the metaphysical principles of many modern psychologists as well as in their worries that these same modern psychologists had a tendency to overlook the transcendent dimension of human existence. This work shows that the first four neo-Thomist thinkers failed to bring the traditions of neo-Thomism and modern psychology together to the extent that they suggested purely theoretical ways of reconciling them.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctrine of Purgatory 1208 1244 Aquinas & Indulgences Patriarchate
    Doctrine of Patriarchate Constantinople Palestine lostPope Clement Bubonic Emperor’s Reformer Council of Spanish purgatory of Kiev retaken 1291 V plague submission John Hus 3 popes! Florence Inquisition 1208 1248 1261 1305 1347 1355 1412 1409 1439 1479 1244 ~1250 1274 1302 1335 1330-1368 1378 1418 1453 Aquinas & Scholasticism Council of Pope Boniface Hundred Barlaam & Popes, antipopes & Council of Fall of indulgences Lyons III Years’ War Palamas schism Constance Constantinople SESSION 23: CRUSADES TO THE FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE – CONTENT 1. Pope Urban’s vision of a unified Church quickly turned into an effort to Latinize the East through the Crusades. Although Pope Innocent III had instructed crusaders to not go to Constantinople (4th, 1204), they took mules into the sanctuary of Hagia Sophia to carry away plunder. And Innocent then said that the crusade was a “just judgement of God”. He began the rebaptizing and reordination of Eastern clergy who converted, and inconsiderately installed a Venetian nobleman as the Latin Patriarch of Constantinople. Later, the West began blaming the East for the crusades’ failures. The following years were devastation in both East and West. The East was under constant Turkish attack as the Byzantine Empire diminished. In the West nationalism gave rise to independent countries and kings, who sought to control Rome. Two events brought great devastation to all of Europe – the Hundred Years’ War between England and France, and the Bubonic Plague. The historian S.E. Ozmont said, “As never before, not even during the century of the Roman Empire’s collapse, Western people walked through the valley of the shadow of death”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problematic of the Augustinian Doctrine of Grace for Contemporary Theology D
    Journal for Christian Theological Research Volume 5 Article 2 2000 Nature Dis-Graced and Grace De-Natured: The Problematic of the Augustinian Doctrine of Grace for Contemporary Theology D. Lyle Dabney Marquette University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/jctr Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Dabney, D. Lyle (2000) "Nature Dis-Graced and Grace De-Natured: The rP oblematic of the Augustinian Doctrine of Grace for Contemporary Theology," Journal for Christian Theological Research: Vol. 5 , Article 2. Available at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/jctr/vol5/iss2000/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal for Christian Theological Research by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 12/18/2017 Nature Dis-Graced and Grace De-Natured: The Problematic of the Augustinian Doctrie of Grace for Contemporary Theology D. Lyle Dabney, "Nature Dis­Graced and Grace De­Natured: The Problematic of the Augustinian Doctrine of Grace for Contemporary Theology," Journal for Christian Theological Research [http://apu.edu/~CTRF/articles/2000_articles/dabney.html] 5:3 (2000). Nature Dis­Graced and Grace De­Natured: The Problematic of the Augustinian Doctrine of Grace for Contemporary Theology D. Lyle Dabney Marquette University , Milwaukee, Wisconsin 1. "Contemporary theology" Kilian McDonnell writes, "has turned from a theology of the Word to a theology of the world".(1) That statement, it seems to me, neatly sums up the current situation in theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholasticism and Biblical Humanism in Early Modern Europe
    INTRODUCTION SCHOLASTICISM AND BIBLICAL HUMANISM IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE Erika Rummel Throughout the Middle Ages dialectical disputation was the domi- nant academic method of inquiry. Built on Aristotelian logic and the summaries and commentaries of medieval exegetes, dialectic was the mainstay of the scholastic system. This habit of mind was challenged in quattrocento Italy by scholars using philological and historical meth- ods in the study of classical texts. For some time the two approaches existed side by side. The dialectic method and its scholastic practitioners continued to dominate the universities, while humanists (as the enthu- siasts of classical literature came to be called) operated mainly outside academic institutions and eventually began to exert infl uence through the new medium of the printing press. The humanistic method was advocated in prefaces accompanying editions of classical texts and discussed in that quintessential humanistic expedient, the personal letter. Letters served as links among members of the humanistic republic of letters and allowed them to form a network of communication. Published in collections, these missives reached an even broader audience. Programmatic pieces advancing the cause of humanism and the New Learning included Petrarch’s prototype attack on the Aristotelians in his epistle On His Own Ignorance (1368); Salutati’s defence of classical pagan literature in his letter to Giovanni da Sam- miniato (1405); the epistolary exchange between Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Ermolao Barbaro on the respective merits of rhetoric and philosophy (1485); Erasmus’ Ratio theologiae, which fi rst appeared among the prefatory material to his New Testament edition (1516); and Philip Melanchthon’s inaugural speech at the University of Wittenberg (1518).
    [Show full text]