Galina Lushnikova Siberian Ethnic Groups – Culture and Language

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galina Lushnikova Siberian Ethnic Groups – Culture and Language Galina Lushnikova Siberian Ethnic Groups – Culture and Language Series A: General & Theoretical Papers ISSN 1435-6473 Essen: LAUD 2004 Paper No. 594 Universität Duisburg-Essen Galina Lushnikova Kemerovo State University (Russia) Siberian Ethnic Groups – Culture and Language Copyright by the author Reproduced by LAUD 2004 Linguistic Agency Series A University of Duisburg-Essen General and Theoretical Fachbereich 3 Paper No. 594 Universitätsstr. 12 D- 45117 Essen Order LAUD-papers online: http://www.linse.uni-due.de/linse/laud/index.html Or contact: [email protected] Galina Lushnikova Siberian Ethnic Groups – Culture and Language On the territory of Siberian Region - Kuzbass (Russia, Western Siberia) there are registered about 116 national minorities, e.g. shors, teleuts, shandins, kalmaks. When language and culture are concerned, the aboriginal population faces two main issues: the first one follows from inefficient language policy and the second one is connected with the dying out of minority languages and hence the exclusion from access to knowledge and skills. The fact is that there are people living in the remote villages in Gornaya Shoria (more than a hundred kilometers away from the city of Novokuznetsk) where the majority of the population do not speak Russian at all. So children under seven speak only their native language. Then, as a rule, they leave their native places for the nearest settlements or towns to study in a boarding school. And as all the subjects are taught in Russian they immediately begin to learn it. Though some of them are quicker to learn due to the prevailing Russian environment still they suffer from language incompetence because some concepts have been already formed on the basis of their native language. The teenagers feel uncomfortable having to study together with younger children, while their coevals are already in the senior forms. Nowadays the general level of education among the population is constantly decreasing. Most job vacancies do not demand a high level of professional background and consequently do not provide tangible educational development of the population. Many of them have only primary or incomplete secondary education and very few of them – secondary or vocational. Another negative factor is a low qualification of teachers. In some schools teachers do not have even secondary vocational education. This inevitably has its impact on the quality of the knowledge acquired by the pupils. As a result, some of them return home. In this context local and regional administrations take concrete steps: ethnic minorities are encouraged to take additional classes in the Russian language and literature and school leavers are admitted to colleges and Universities on preferential terms. The second issue concerns the fact that minority languages are practically expiring. Fewer and fewer people speak their native languages, Russian dominating all spheres of life – education, politics and business. The representatives of national minorities challenge it in different ways: adult populations try to preserve their ethnic language and culture cherishing traditions, customs and rituals, while the younger generation see no practical use in it focusing their efforts on acquiring Russian and modern European languages. Ethnologists and linguists of Kuzbass Universities are concerned about it. No nation can exist without its own language, customs and traditions. And the matter of preserving each national minority in Russia is of paramount importance as each national minority is 1 part and parcel of the whole nation. Scholars and local authorities united their efforts in the following projects: in 2002 the Regional Administration formed the Department of National policy to coordinate the activities of different groups, organizations and individuals; Kuzbass Pedagogical Academy opened the Department of Shors’ History and Culture; several schools offer optional classes on ethnic languages, history and literature; Kemerovo Publishing House started publishing bilingual books of poetry and prose; special scientific programmes are being developed on the History and Philology Departments in Kuzbass Colleges and Universities whose main goal is to interpret and analyze the folklore of ethnic minorities. Still there is much to be done to empower Siberian ethnic minorities through Russian and at the same time to preserve their national peculiarities. Until the end of the 20th century the Shors did not have a written language, and that was one of the reasons why the people’s oral activities were well developed, passing from one generation to another. Among these were songs, legends, fairy tales, stories about warriors and their heroic deeds, proverbs and sayings. This is all known to the reader thanks to the researches of scientists V.V.Radlov, V.I. Verbitski, N.P. Direncova, A.I. Chudoyakov. According to the modern linguistic classification the Shors language belongs to the Khakass subgroup, the Uigur-Uiguz group of the East-Hun branch of the Turkic languages. But only 9000 Shors consider the Shor language to be their mother tongue and only 900 of them speak it fluently. The Mrass dialect was taken as the basis of the Shor literary language that was also enriched by the Kondom dialect. There are 38 letters in the Shor alphabet based on the Russian alphabet and in addition to the letters of the Russian alphabet there are 5 special letters which render the sounds not existing in Russian, namely F, K, H, Ö, У. Nowadays the Shors use the Russian language and they speak the Shors language exclusively in their community. The Shors is a Turkic – speaking nation, the numerically small one, which lives in southern Siberia mostly in three basins of the rivers the Kondoma, the Mrassu and the Tom. The Shor nation was formed during the long – lasting process of mixing of the Ugor, the Samody, the Helt on the one hand and Turkic tribes on the other. The Shors have been known to the Russians since the end of the XVth century when Siberia became part of Russia. It happened in the reign of Ivan the Terrible (Ivan Grozni). The times of Ivan Vasilievich Grozni were really terrible. Historians state that the terror of the “Oprichni” period caused no less harm to the Russian people than the invasion of the Crimean Khan. As a logical end to the governing of the tsar-tyrant the Russians suffered severe starvation that led to robberies and denunciation. Then there came the vague times - the Bolotnikov revolt, the invasion of Lzedmitries, the interreign period, the Moscow Fire etc. 2 At this time sixteen-year-old Michael Fedorovich became the tsar and the honored Grand Duke of Russia. But this period was no better – the country was overrun with forged money, the roads were roamed by beggars, hungry crowds, descendants. Some joined the robbers, others decided to become free Don Kazaks. The bravest went east beyond the Stone (the Ural Mountains). That was how Ostafei Kharlamov, the son of a nobleman, happened to be in Siberia and later became the first commander- in-chief of the Kuznetsk fortress on the Tom. Kuznetsk, named after the native population Kuznetski totars that later were called the Shors, for more than 200 years had remained the most southward fortress of Siberia. The fortress, having lost within time its military significance, was excluded from the permanent register of fortresses in 1819. Though the founding of the city at the Upper Tom started the development of this region, it was not considered to be a great historical event. It was not marked by any “bloodstained battle” or any other bloodshed, as history likes to give credit to and store in memory. Generally speaking the Siberian chronicle dating back to the first days of Russia state according to Academician Miller (1775-1783) confirms that, when people are treated with caring and love they usually do what is expected from them. On the contrary, they struggle furiously and became rebellious, when they are abused without reason or when the local military commanders demand from them more than they could give. They preferred to pay “yasak”, a fir tribute, to anybody who could protect them from the steppe robbers. The local Shor – and Teleut tribes always had trouble with all sorts of intruders. By the time the Russians came the Shor nationality had not yet been formed. The place was inhabited by strange forest tribes who did not only fish and hunt but also could smelt ore and make various tools and utensils of iron: kettles, axes, traps, arrow heads. It was this trade of the forest people that surprised the first Russian explorers because Russia had no iron at that time. Anything made from metal was considered by the Russians as something of special value. So the Shor iron-smelters preferred to pay iron “yasak” to the state. The Shor people had patriarchal families. The clan family descendants had the name of their predecessor. The name was given after the nearby river - the Tom, the Kondoma, the Mrassu. The riverside forest belonged to them. The members of a clan were counted in bows belonging to male members of the clan e.g. the Karga clan had forty bows, the Kobi fifty bows etc. Actually they began to be called the “Shors” only in the 19th century after the largest clan shors that lived in the Upper Kondoma. In the earlier chronicles they were referred to as the Kondoma and the Mrassu Tatars. In the beginning of the 20-th century this territory was named by the name of the nationality, which now occupies the south of the Kemerovo region – Mountainous Shoria (Gornaya Shoria). 3 Besides hunting, fishing, and iron smelting, the Shor tribes of those times sowed wild hemp from which they produced coarse linen. From Russian chronicles dated 1622 it is known, that the inhabitants of the north region of Shoria (the Abints, named after the river Aba), cultivated the hills of the forest and sowed wheat and barley.
Recommended publications
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Siberiaâ•Žs First Nations
    TITLE: SIBERIA'S FIRST NATIONS AUTHOR: GAIL A. FONDAHL, University of Northern British Columbia THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE VIII PROGRAM 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION:1 CONTRACTOR: Dartmouth College PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Gail A. Fondahl COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER: 808-28 DATE: March 29, 1995 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law. 1 The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended). The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author(s). CONTENTS Executive Summary i Siberia's First Nations 1 The Peoples of the
    [Show full text]
  • Color Symbolism in the Bashkir Toponymy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 18, 12281-12288 OPEN ACCESS Color Symbolism in the Bashkir Toponymy Gulnur Kh. Bukharovaa, Luiza Kh. Samsitovaa, Salima A. Tagirovaa, Akhmet Kh. Davletkulova, Raisa G. Davletbajevaa and Minsilu G. Usmanovaa aBashkir State Pedagogical University named after of M. Akmulla, Ufa, RUSSIA ABSTRACT The author attempts to explain the origin of place-names with components aҡ (white) and ҡara (black) in the Bashkir toponymy based on a wide involvement of the facts of mythopoetic symbolism. The study of color symbolism in place-names helps to reveal the code of ethnocultural information embedded in place-names, as well as to identify people's worldviews and fragments of the ethnic view of the world. As the analysis shows, the colors аҡ (white) and ҡара (black) in the Bashkir folk culture, including the toponymy, create a binary opposition white - black, often correlated with the opposition good - bad. In the formation of linguocultural competence of students of philological faculties studying the language of the region, in particular the ethno-linguistic, ethno- cultural, linguocultural, and socio-cultural aspects of its studying play an important role. KEYWORDS ARTICLE HISTORY Bashkir language, toponymy, Received 22 October 2016 ethnolinguistics, color symbolism, Revised 27 November 2016 linguocultural competence Accepted 05 December 2016 Introduction The relevance of research The study of regional onomastics in line with the latest achievements of modern linguistics is very relevant. The data of onomastics allow to solve not only common and linguistic problems of modern science, but also socio- pragmatic problems that arise in today's society.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples of Russia and Political History
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF RUSSIA AND POLITICAL HISTORY Galina Diatchkova Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Abstract I Resume The author presents a brief history ofthe Indigenous people ofthe Russian Federation, noting the different types of government policies over past centuries. She then outlines changes underthe more democratic emphasis of the current Russian Federation. New initiatives indicate the possible restoration oflanguages and education systems. There is also the potential for new, culturally appropriate, adminstrative systems. L'auteure presents un resume de I'histoire des peuples autochtones de la Federation russe en mettant en evidence les politiques gouvemementales adoptees au cours des siecles. Elle presente ensuite un aperyu des changements suscites par Ie democratisation de la Federation russe ac­ tuelle. De nouvelles initiatives indiquent la restauration possible d'un systeme d'education axe sur les autochtones et de I'utilisation des langues autochtones. Elles indiquent aussi I'etablissement potentiel de nouveaux systemes administratifs adaptes aux differences culturelles. The Canadian Journal ofNative Stucles XXI, 2(2001 ):217-233. 218 Galina Diatchkova According to a list included with Government Decree 255 dated March 24, 2000 "On the Unified Enumeration of Small In~igenous Nations of the Russian Federation", 40 nations are classified as small Indigenous nations of the North, Siberia and the Far East of Russia. 1 Their population is estimated at approximately 180,000 people residing in 28 regions of the Russian Federation. The regions of the Far North and similar areas make up about 64% ofthe territory ofthe country. The total population ofthe North accounts for approximately 8% of the entire population of the Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Johannes Rohr Report 18 IWGIA – 2014 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Copyright: IWGIA Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Proofreading: Elaine Bolton Cover design and layout: Jorge Monrás Cover photo: Sakhalin: Indigenous ceremony opposite to oil facilities. Photographer: Wolfgang Blümel Prepress and print: Electronic copy only Hurridocs Cip data Title: IWGIA Report 18: Indigenous Peoples in the Russian Federation Author: Johannes Rohr Editor: Diana Vinding and Kathrin Wessendorf Number of pages: 69 ISBN: 978-87-92786-49-4 Language: English Index: 1. Indigenous peoples – 2. Human rights Geographical area: Russian Federation Date of publication: 2014 INTERNATIONAL WORK GROUP FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS Classensgade 11 E, DK 2100 - Copenhagen, Denmark Tel: (45) 35 27 05 00 - Fax: (45) 35 27 05 07 E-mail: [email protected] - Web: www.iwgia.org This report has been prepared and published with the financial support of the Foreign Ministry of Denmark through its Neighbourhood programme. CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1 The indigenous peoples of the north ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Matters of definition .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination Against Shor Communities in Myski Municipal
    Submission to the Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination regarding Discrimination against Shor communities in Myski municipal district, Kemerovo Oblast, Russian Federation Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), 86 Session, 27 April - 15 May 2015 submitted by Myski local civic organisation “Revival of Kazas and the Shor people” Address: ul. Olimpiiskya 4, kv. 33, 652840 Myski, Kemerovskaya oblast, Russian Federation, E-Mail: tanntol @ mail .ru International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) Address: Classensgade 11e, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Website: http://www.iwgia.org, E-Mail: [email protected] Institute for Ecology and Action Anthropology (INFOE) Address: Melchiorstr. 3, 50670 Cologne, Germany Website: http://www.infoe.de, E-Mail: infoe @ infoe .de Contents 1Executive summary............................................................................................................................3 2Background.........................................................................................................................................5 2.1The Shor people...........................................................................................................................5 2.1.1Demographics.......................................................................................................................5 2.1.2Shor Culture and language...................................................................................................5 2.1.3Legal
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Tradition 28.2
    Oral Tradition, 28/2 (2013):193-204 On the Principles of a Digital Text Corpus: New Opportunities in Working on Heroic Epics of the Shors Dmitri A. Funk Introduction The Corpus of Folklore Texts in the Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia (http:// corpora.iea.ras.ru) is a collection of folklore texts in lesser used, mostly endangered, Siberian languages and was initiated in 2011 through support from the Department of Northern and Siberian Studies at the Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS).1 The main idea was to create a corpus capable of storing both an original version and an orthographically standardized version of any text. Another task was to build a system able to perform some related analytical procedures. At the same time we were aiming at making a significant part of the unknown materials available for researchers and others able to read in the native Siberian languages. This essay will use the Shor corpus as its main example, though the Teleut, Evenki, or Nenets corpora might easily have been chosen instead. The reasoning behind this choice is the fact that the whole project arose out of my long-term study of the Shor epics. Additionally, the Shor (like the Teleut) materials belong for the most part to me, and I am the primary individual who has been working with them within the frame of this project. It is my hope that this single example will help readers better understand what our Corpus is able to do and how it has been organized.
    [Show full text]
  • New Traditional Narratives
    Book review BOOK REVIEW NEW TRADITIONAL NARRATIVES Tokmashov, Boris Ivanovich. Қаан Оолақ: богатырское сказание кондомских шорцев [Qaan Oolaq: a hero tale of the Kondoma Shors]. Novokuznetsk: Novokuznetsk printing centre, 2009. 148 pp. In Russian. ISBN 978- 5-8441-0303-2 In 2009, a unique edition of Shors heroic epics came out as a book in a limited print run of 150 copies from a publisher in one of Kemerovo region’s major towns (South of Western Siberia, Russia). It was unique be- fore anything else because, at the moment it appeared, it was the first, over the last 70 or so years, publica- tion of the Shors bogatyr epic tale that represented a poorly known Kondoma (after the Kondoma river) epic tradition. However, the circumstances around the emergence of the text itself are also of considerable interest, which makes us yet again go back to the discussion of the case of the epic “tradition”. But first a few words on the structure of the book. The epic text is prefaced by a brief introduction telling us why this particular text was chosen and what the specific issues with its representation were. Boris Tokmashov edited the publication, and translated into Russian himself one of the epic tales that he had heard in his childhood from his brother Viktor Tokmashov (1914–1973), a renowned storyteller born in the village of Tagdagal (presently, the town of Osinniki). Since Shors epics were performed in a guttural singing style accompanied with the narration of sung fragments; and the storyteller Tokmashov was no exception to that tradition, the publishers broke the epic down into 183 fragments of unequal length, “guessing that the storyteller V.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Origin of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 1540–1543 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1018-4813/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/ejhg LETTERS According to our data, the age of STR variation within hg N1b as a whole is about 12 ky (12.1±4.4 ky). This age was On the origin of estimated as the average squared difference in the number of repeats between all the current chromosomes and the Y-chromosome founder haplotype, averaged over microsatellite loci and divided by the effective mutation rate of 0.00069 per locus haplogroup N1b per 25 years.7 We used the median haplotypes (formed by the median values of the repeat scores at each microsatellite European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 1540–1541; locus within each hg) as the founding ones.8 The age of doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.100; published online 17 June 2009 subcluster N1b-A in Siberian and Uralic populations is 4.2±1.1 ky, with the age prevailing in South Siberia in comparison with Northwest Siberia and Urals (4.8±1.7 vs Recently, Mirabal et al1 have noted that their results of 3.1±0.9 ky, respectively). However, the age of subcluster Y-chromosome haplogroup (hg) N1b analysis challenge N1b-E in Northwest Siberian, Uralic and Northeast European earlier findings2,3 and suggest that N1b-P43 mutation Russian populations is much higher, being equal to may have occurred in the Uralic range rather than in 6.8±2.6 ky. Subcluster N1b-E differs sharply from N1b-A in Siberia and much earlier than has been proposed its median repeat scores at four loci (DYS19, DYS385a,b, (12.9±4.1 instead of 5.2±2.7 kya).
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient DNA Reveals Prehistoric Gene-Flow from Siberia in the Complex Human Population History of North East Europe
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 2-14-2013 Ancient DNA Reveals Prehistoric Gene-Flow From Siberia in the Complex Human Population History of North East Europe Clio Der Sarkissian Oleg Balanovsky Guido Brandt Valery Khartanovich Alexandra Buzhilova See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Sarkissian, C., Balanovsky, O., Brandt, G., Khartanovich, V., Buzhilova, A., Koshel, S., Zaporozhchenko, V., Gronenborn, D., Moiseyev, V., Kolpakov, E., Shumkin, V., Alt, K. W., Balanovska, E., Cooper, A., Haak, W., Genographic Consortium, & Schurr, T. G. (2013). Ancient DNA Reveals Prehistoric Gene-Flow From Siberia in the Complex Human Population History of North East Europe. PLoS Genetics, 9 (8), e1003296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003296 Theodore G. Schurr is not listed as an individual author on this paper but is part of the Genographic Consortium. A full list of Genographic Consortium members for this paper can be found in the Acknowledgements. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/45 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ancient DNA Reveals Prehistoric Gene-Flow From Siberia in the Complex Human Population History of North East Europe Abstract North East Europe harbors a high diversity of cultures and languages, suggesting a complex genetic history. Archaeological, anthropological, and genetic research has revealed a series of influences from Western and Eastern Eurasia in the past. While genetic data from modern-day populations is commonly used to make inferences about their origins and past migrations, ancient DNA provides a powerful test of such hypotheses by giving a snapshot of the past genetic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Books About Evenki
    Book review BOOK REVIEW NEW TRADITIONAL NARRATIVES Tokmashov, Boris Ivanovich. Қаан Оолақ: богатырское сказание кондомских шорцев [Qaan Oolaq: a hero tale of the Kondoma Shors]. Novokuznetsk: Novokuznetsk printing centre, 2009. 148 pp. In Russian. ISBN 978- 5-8441-0303-2 In 2009, a unique edition of Shors heroic epics came out as a book in a limited print run of 150 copies from a publisher in one of Kemerovo region’s major towns (South of Western Siberia, Russia). It was unique be- fore anything else because, at the moment it appeared, it was the first, over the last 70 or so years, publica- tion of the Shors bogatyr epic tale that represented a poorly known Kondoma (after the Kondoma river) epic tradition. However, the circumstances around the emergence of the text itself are also of considerable interest, which makes us yet again go back to the discussion of the case of the epic “tradition”. But first a few words on the structure of the book. The epic text is prefaced by a brief introduction telling us why this particular text was chosen and what the specific issues with its representation were. Boris Tokmashov edited the publication, and translated into Russian himself one of the epic tales that he had heard in his childhood from his brother Viktor Tokmashov (1914–1973), a renowned storyteller born in the village of Tagdagal (presently, the town of Osinniki). Since Shors epics were performed in a guttural singing style accompanied with the narration of sung fragments; and the storyteller Tokmashov was no exception to that tradition, the publishers broke the epic down into 183 fragments of unequal length, “guessing that the storyteller V.
    [Show full text]
  • Legend People and Ethnic Groups According to 2010
    Finnish Tatars Migrated at the end of 19th century from the Nizhniy Novgorod area. They populate the largest cities of the country. Lithuanian Tatars (also Lithuanian-Polish, Belorussian, Lipka Tatars) Descendants of the Golden Horde who became servants to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. They lost their native language, but developed a written Izhemsky District language based on old Belarusian Oil extraction, work migration, using Arabic script. second half of 20th century and 21st century. Vorkuta Ostroh Tatars Nizhgari Kostroma Tatars of Crimean origin living Tatars of Nizhny Novgorod. Tatars in the city of Ostroh and Migrants from villages of Volhynia (Yuvkivtsi, Romanov city in the etc) from the 17th century until 18th century, where Chulyms Legend beginning of the 20th century. Krasnooktyabrsk Ivan the Terrible made (Chulym Tatars) East them settled in the Turkic non-Muslim small Yellow – ethnic groups which National Self-identification Tatar Ethnographic History Dialectology y District people group. 16th century A.D. Tatars comprise of 69% are not related to Tatar or which Crimean Tatars consider Kazan, Siberian, Astrakhan, There are three main dialects of the of the population. Nizhgari relation is disputed. themselves to be a distinct ethnic and Crimean Tatars originated in Tatar language in traditional Russian Romanian Tatars Tatars of Nizhny Novgorod. Grey – prominent areas with They moved to Dobruja from Karatai Beserman group […identify themselves as a related Khanates. classification: northern areas of the Black Sea Moscow Ethnic Mokshas (Mordvin) who Udmurt ethnic group having settlements of various Tatar distinct nation] and other Tatar Mishars originated in the south- • Western (Mishar) region after the area was occupied Qasim Tatars adopted the Tatar language.
    [Show full text]