DOCSLIB.ORG

Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project (Electric)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project (Electric) Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project (Electric) 2018 BUILD Discretionary Grants Program Application Prepared by: Skagit County Public Works 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA 98273 Submitted to: US Department of Transportation BUILD Discretionary Grants Program July 2018 Table of Contents Section 1 Project Description ............................................................................... 1 Section 2 Project Location .................................................................................... 3 Section 3 Grant Funds, Sources, & Uses of Funding ......................................... 4 3.1 Project Costs .................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 All Funding Sources ........................................................................................................ 5 3.3 Non-Federal Funds Documentation ................................................................................. 6 3.4 Matching Funds Documentation ...................................................................................... 7 3.5 Detailed Project Budget ................................................................................................... 7 Section 4 Merit Criteria .......................................................................................... 9 4.1 Safety ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 State of Good Repair ...................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Economic Competitiveness ............................................................................................ 12 4.4 Environmental Protection .............................................................................................. 13 4.5 Quality of Life................................................................................................................ 15 4.6 Innovation ...................................................................................................................... 17 4.7 Partnership ..................................................................................................................... 18 4.8 Non-Federal Revenue for Transportation Infrastructure Investment ............................. 20 4.9 Benefit Cost Analysis Summary .................................................................................... 20 Section 5 Project Readiness ............................................................................... 21 5.1 Technical Feasibility ...................................................................................................... 21 5.2 Project Schedule............................................................................................................. 25 5.3 Required Approvals ....................................................................................................... 27 5.3.1 Environmental Permits and Reviews ................................................................... 27 5.3.2 Federal Transportation Requirements Affecting State & Local Planning ........... 28 5.4 Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies ................................................. 29 Funding Risks ................................................................................................................... 29 Appendices Appendix A: Project Narrative References………………………………….. Attachment 3 Appendix B: Benefit Cost Analysis…………………………………………. Attachment 4 Appendix C Funding Documentation………………………………………. Attachment 5 Appendix D Letters of Support……………………………………………... Attachment 6 Skagit County BUILD Grant Application Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project i 19 July 2018 Appendix E Skagit County Ferry Replacement Newsletters……………….. Attachment 7 Appendix F Economic and Quality of Life Data……………………………Attachment 8 Appendix G State and Local Planning Documentation…………………….. Attachment 9 Appendix H 32-Car Electric Ferry Renderings……………………………..Attachment 10 Appendix I BCA Worksheet EXCEL……………………………………...Attachment 11 Skagit County BUILD Grant Application Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project ii 19 July 2018 Section 1 Project Description Skagit County Public Works seeks contract design and construction funding to procure a 32-car electric ferry for service to Guemes Island, WA, a rural community 65 miles north of Seattle. Established in the early 1960's, the county's ferry service provides the only publicly available means of transit between Guemes Island and the mainland, functioning as a lifeline for the delivery of passengers, vehicles, goods, and emergency services to the island. The route is currently served by a single 39-year-old diesel-powered ferry, the M/V Guemes. The 21-car, 100-passenger M/V Guemes transports roughly 200,000 vehicles and 400,000 passengers annually. M/V Guemes has had regular maintenance over the years and a major re-power in 2006, but has remained largely unchanged since entering service in 1979. Since 2014, the ferry division has spent nearly $750,000 annually on drydock, and associated maintenance and repair costs of the aging vessel. This has become increasingly burdensome on the County's road fund, which subsidized the ferry at approximately $1 million per year in the last few years. A study conducted in 2013 concluded that it would be more economical to replace the ferry than to preserve it, as discussed in Section 4.2 and Appendix A, Reference 1. In addition to nearing the end of its useful economic life, M/V Guemes is undersized with respect to the ferry route's future ridership demand projections (see Section 5.1 and Appendix A, Reference 2), potentially burdening economic activity in the surrounding project area if a higher-capacity replacement that supports reliability and future ferry needs is not acquired. Skagit County began considering replacement options in earnest in 2014, and in 2017 hired Seattle-based naval architecture firm Glosten to develop a concept design for a replacement ferry. The concept design (Appendix A, Reference 3) was completed in 2017. Major areas of design emphasis included vessel capacity, propulsion system type, and vessel emergency service capability. In order to size the replacement vessel appropriately, Glosten carried out a parametric ridership study that used historical ferry ridership and County population data to forecast vehicle and passenger demand through the year 2060 (Appendix A, Reference 2). This data was used to determine the optimal size for the new vessel, accommodating the ferry service's projected ridership growth while keeping vessel capacity below thresholds that would generate additional crewing costs and regulatory burden. A significant portion of the design effort focused on propulsion system selection. Skagit County's Board of Commissioners requested that battery electric propulsion be considered due to the environmental protection, quality of life, and operating cost benefits such a system could provide. Lifecycle cost estimates were developed to show total cost of a battery electric vessel, along with the shoreside infrastructure and terminal upgrades necessary to operate it (see Section 3.1). These cost studies revealed significant operating cost savings, but with increased initial capital expenditures necessary to complete essential shoreside infrastructure and terminal upgrades. Skagit County conducted an environmental review process under the State Environmental Policy Act, completing the evaluation as of July 2018. The County offered two early comment periods with the Guemes Island public and other state and local agencies in February and April 2018, and issued a Determination of Non-Significance and environmental assessment with a formal Skagit County BUILD Grant Application Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project 1 19 July 2018 comment period in June 2018. The County responded to public comments by analyzing a wider range of ferry sizes and addressing the potential for growth. Receiving funding to complete design and construction of the 32-car electric ferry and the requisite terminal improvements would enable the County to operate its ferry service at lower costs than with a conventional propulsion system while utilizing an innovative propulsion system, reducing environmental impacts, improving the ferry system's state of repair, and improving the quality of service to island residents and visitors. Furthermore, acquiring a replacement ferry will ensure the continued availability of the ferry service's important emergency service function of transporting emergency vehicles and personnel to the island. The BUILD grant is also essential to helping the County securing the necessary construction funds and designing the ferry terminals allowing the NEPA process to commence consistent with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) guidance. Existing Ferry (M/V Guemes) Passenger 100 Capacity Vehicle 21 Capacity Annual Operating $1,246,455 Cost Geared Propulsion Diesel 1979- Service Life present 32-Car Electric Ferry (Concept Design) Passenger 150 Capacity Vehicle 32 Capacity Annual Operating $714,075 Cost Battery Propulsion Electric Service Life 2021-2060 (Estimated) Skagit County BUILD Grant Application Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project 2 19 July 2018 Section 2 Project Location Figure 1 Guemes Island Ferry Replacement Project (Electric) Vicinity Map The project location is in northwest Washington, with the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Friends of Guemes Island
    Land use Impacts of the GUEMES ISLAND FERRY SCHEDULE EXTENSION Prepared for FRIENDS OF GUEMES ISLAND Prepared by Barbara Rudge May 2007 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of Adverse Impacts to Natural and Built Environment………….. PAGE 1 SECTION I- SKAGIT COUNTY ACTIONS TAKEN ON GUEMES ISLAND FERRY SCHEDULE EXTENSION………….. PAGE 2 SECTION II- GROWTH INDUCING IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION Issue 1- The Ferry schedule extension is a transportation improvement that will be growth inducing to Guemes Island…….. PAGE 4 Issue 2- Improvements to transportation links have a history of adverse impacts to land uses………………………………………. PAGE 4 Issue 3- Ferries, like road and bridges, promote growth……………… PAGE 5 Issue 4- Environmental analysis of the San Francisco Ferry System expansion confirms a ferry extension is growth inducing……. PAGE 6 Issue 5- Kitsap County voters reject a proposed ferry to rural landings due to acknowledged growth inducing impacts to rural areas…. PAGE 7 Issue 6- The Anderson Island Ferry schedule extension failed to alleviate congested traffic as predicted and produced dramatic adverse impacts to the island and its population………………………… PAGE 7 Issue 7- The Ferry schedule extension will remove an obstacle to access and will increase demand for property on Guemes Island…….. PAGE 9 SECTION III - DEMAND AND GROWTH Issue 1 -Current Washington State growth rates indicate strong demand for homes in Skagit County……………………………………. PAGE 9 Issue 2- Despite limited resources and no plan for accommodating new growth without significant adverse impacts to island water supply, existing lots and zoning allow for significant growth on Guemes Island…………………………………………………………… PAGE 10 Issue 3- If the county were to adopt a complete moratorium on building permits, island population could easily triple if vacant units were fully occupied……………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report | 2017-2022 TDP
    2016 Annual Report | 2017-2022 TDP Approved: August 16 2017 by Resolution 2017-06 Comment Period: 7/17/2017 – 8/16/2017 Public Hearing: 8/16/2017 at 1:00 PM at the Burlington City Hall Council Chambers, 833 S Spruce St, Burlington, WA 98233 Traducción: Disponible mediante solicitud. Email: [email protected] Teléfono: 360-757-5179 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ron Wesen Jill Boudreau Skagit County Commissioner Mayor, Mount Vernon Keith Wagoner, Chair Kenneth Dahlstedt, Vice Chair Mayor, Sedro-Woolley Skagit County Commissioner Laurie Gere Lisa Janicki Mayor Anacortes Skagit County Commissioner Rick DeGloria Steve Sexton Burlington City Council Mayor, Burlington Ken Quam Marge Root, Mount Vernon City Council Labor Representative (non-voting member) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dale S. O’Brien MANAGERS Motoko Pleasant, Finance & Administration Troy Fair, Operations Chris Chidley, Information Technologies Allan Schaner, Maintenance & Facilities Skagit Transit TDP 2017-2022 3 Introduction Skagit Transit’s Six-Year Transit Development Plan (TDP) identifies how the agency will meet state and local long-range priorities for public transportation through capital improvements, operating changes, and other programs. It also addresses how such programs will be funded. The Plan conforms to the State’s transportation system policy goals (RCW 47.04.280) and supports local comprehensive planning and economic objectives within Skagit County. State transportation system policy goals are: Economic vitality. To promote and develop transportation systems that stimulate, support, and enhance the movement of people and goods to ensure a prosperous economy; Preservation. To maintain, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation systems and services; Safety. To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system; Mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan
    Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan December 2018 Prepared for Skagit Council of Governments SCOG Skagit Council of Governments Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan December 2018 Prepared for SCOG Skagit Council of Governments Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Seattle, WA | Bethesda, MD | Austin, TX Table of Contents Section 1 – Background and Overview of the Planning Process 1-1 Section 4 – Technology and Emergency Management Considerations 4-1 Introduction 1-1 Introduction 4-1 Background 1-1 ITS Technologies 4-1 Overview of the Planning Process 1-2 Collaboration with Emergency Management Agencies 4-1 Section 2 – Existing Transportation Services 2-1 Section 5 – Potential Strategies and Projects 5-1 Introduction 2-1 Introduction 5-1 Public Transit Systems 2-1 Strategies for Sustaining Existing Services 5-1 Tribes 2-4 Strategies for Expanding Existing Services 5-3 Human Service Agencies and Non-Profit Programs 2-5 Strategies for Creating New Services 5-3 Information, Referral, Rider Education, and Advocacy 2-7 Strategies for Enhancing Services 5-3 Schools 2-8 Strategies for Facilitating Access to Services 5-4 Ferry Services 2-9 Strategies for Coordinating Services, Support Functions, and 5-4 Planning Long Distance Bus and Rail Providers 2-9 Strategies for Promoting Environmental Sustainability 5-5 Medical Transportation Providers 2-10 Priorities for Implementation 5-5 Other Providers 2-11 Ongoing Coordination 5-5 Section 3 – Needs Assessment and Gap
    [Show full text]
  • Olympia Meeting Summary January 14 & 15 2020
    Olympia Meeting Summary January 14 & 15 2020 Vice-Chair Roy Jennings opened the meeting at 9:00 am with introductions by Commissioners. Commissioners Litt, Batra, and Restucci did not attend. Commission Business Commissioner Tortorelli moved and Commissioner Serebrin seconded the motion approving the December 17 & 18, 2019 meeting summary. The motion was approved unanimously. ACTION: Meeting summary approved unanimously. Commissioner Reports: • Commissioner Tortorelli reported that the Spokane Regional Transportation Council is having a training session for new members • Commissioner Debbie Young attended several ferry meetings, including a San Juan’s FAC meeting • Commissioner Jennings attended an I-5 bridge meeting. Attended RUC and tolling subcommittee calls Reema Griffith apprised the Commission of the proposal to name a portion of US 97 in Klickitat County the WW II Veteran’s Memorial Highway. The proponents will be coming to the February Commission meeting. The Road Usage Charge (RUC) Report was transmitted to the Legislature and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Next week the RUC Report will be presented to the House and Senate Transportation Committees. Model Uniform Act on Automated Vehicle Operation After two years of drafting, in summer 2019 the Uniform Law Committee adopted the Model Uniform Act on Automated Vehicle Operation. Michele Radosevich, Davis Wright Tremaine, one of the drafters of the Uniform Law, explained its scope and purpose. States have a traditional role of addressing the rules of the road and licensing requirements. The Model Act covers: • Deployment of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) on roads open to the public o Traffic laws and enforcement o Vehicle registration o Driver licensing 1 January 14 & 15, 2020 o Potential conflicts with state motor vehicle laws The Model Act doesn’t cover: • Testing of aspirational automated vehicles for the purposes of research and development; • Remote driving, in which a human drives a vehicle while outside of or far from it; • Vehicle features that merely assist a human driver.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft AG Meeting 2 Agenda 1.0 MM
    PIERCE COUNTY WATERB ORNE TRANSPOR TATION STUDY ADVISORY GROUP MEETING 2 AGENDA Wednesday, January 14, 2015, 1:30-3:30pm Steilacoom Community Center, 2301 Worthington Street MEETING OBJECTIVES: • Review Situation Assessment initial findings on ridership, demographics, fares, and financial outlook and gather Advisory Group input and feedback. • Gather input on survey design. 1:30 Welcome and Introduction Valerie Thorsen (Pierce County)/ • Objectives for today’s meeting Michael Hodgins (BERK) • Meeting schedule • Review December meeting summary 1:40 Ridership, Market, and Demographic Analysis Michael • Current and historic trends • Baseline projections 2:25 Fares and Financial Situation Vivien/Michael • Fare structure • Current financial situation • Baseline financial outlook 3:10 Survey Design and Key Questions Melanie • Summary of previous survey questions • Areas of focus for 2015 surveys 3:20 Public Comment 3:30 Confirm Next Steps; Adjourn Michael PIERCE COUNTY WATERBORNE TRANSPORTATION STUDY Advisory Group Meeting: December 8, 2014 DRAFT Meeting Summary In Attendance: Jim Bixler (Chief, Anderson Island Fire and Kendel Lyman (Anderson Island Volunteer Rescue) Patrol) Marion Chenaur (Ketron Island Resident) Krista Ullis (Riviera Club Media: Anderson Island) Ann Dasch (Anderson Island Resident) Laurie Vallieres (Anderson Island Elementary Chris Frye (Anderson Island Resident) Principal, Steilacoom School District) Dave Jacobsen (Anderson Island Citizens’ Valerie Thorsen (Pierce County Public Works Advisory Board Ferry Liaison) and Utilities) Paul Loveless (Administrator, town of Michael Hodgins (BERK) Steilacoom) Melanie Mayock (BERK) Welcome & Introductions Michael described the purpose of the meeting: to kick off the 2014/15 Waterborne Transportation Study Advisory Group, to share the current approach to the project, and to understand the Advisory Group’s perspectives on the challenges and opportunities facing the Pierce County Ferry System today.
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit County Transportation Element Technical Appendix
    SKAGIT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2016 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL APPENDIX SKAGIT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TECHNICAL APPENDIX The review and proposed revisions to the Transportation Element for the 2016 Skagit County Comprehensive Plan Update are focused on complying with Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, updating the plan data and policies, and streamlining documents that make up the element. Regarding that final point, the attached 2016 Transportation Element Technical Appendix is proposed to replace the existing Transportation Systems Plan (TSP) and consists of the following: transportation system inventory, land use assumptions, travel forecasts, Level of Service (LOS) Standards, current and future transportation needs, and a transportation financial plan. Many details not required by GMA and not being used by Skagit County are proposed for removal as the Transportation Systems Plan becomes the Transportation Technical Appendix. DRAFT| February 2016 1 SKAGIT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 2016 TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 5 2.0 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INVENTORY ................................................... 5 2.1 STREETS, ROADS + HIGHWAYS ................................................................... 5 2.2 NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION ....................................................... 19 2.3 TRANSIT .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Summary of Public Transportation — 2006
    Washington State Summary of Public Transportation — 2006 Public Transportation Division Washington State Summary of Public Transportation — 2006 September 2007 Public Transportation Division with partial financial assistance through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, and Federal Highway Administration Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be provided in alternative formats: large print, Braille, cassette tape, or on computer disk for people with disabilities by calling the Office of Equal Opportunity at 360-705-7097. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request for alternative formats through the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. This report can be read and downloaded in part or in its entirety from the Web site of the Washington State Department of Transportation, Public Transportation Division: www.wsdot.wa.gov/transit For additional copies, contact: Washington State Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division PO Box 47387 Olympia, WA 98504-7387 Contents 1 Introduction 5 Statewide Operations Overview 19 Systems Serving Urbanized Areas 21 C-TRAN 27 Community Transit 35 Everett Transit 41 King County Metro Transit 49 Pierce Transit 57 Sound Transit 65 Spokane Transit Authority 71 Systems Serving Small Urban Areas 73 Ben Franklin Transit 79 Cowlitz Transit Authority 83 Intercity Transit 91 Kitsap Transit 99 Link Transit 105 Skagit Transit 111 Whatcom Transportation Authority 119 Yakima Transit 125 Systems Serving Rural Areas 127 Asotin
    [Show full text]
  • February 2011 After 20 Years, a Planning Victory in Long-Awaited Move, County Commissioners Approve Sub-Area Plan
    $2.25 Vol. 2 No. 1 February 2011 After 20 Years, a Planning Victory In Long-Awaited Move, County Commissioners Approve Sub-Area Plan By Edith Walden Skagit County. The result is that po- On January 18, the Skagit County tential aquaculture projects may still be Board of Commissioners unanimous- restricted, but must be reviewed on a ly voted to adopt the Guemes Island case-by-case basis. Sub-Area Plan as recommended by the One policy in the plan provides that Skagit County Planning Commission. a permanent, nine-member Guemes The plan is a culmination of 20 years Island Planning Advisory Committee of effort by two island committees. It be elected to provide communications provides guidance in managing future between island property owners/resi- development while maintaining the dents and government agencies regard- island’s natural resources. ing the sub-area plan. Later this year, Only one change was made to the Guemes Island property owners and E plan as submitted by the Planning residents will be asked to elect the per- DIT Commission. The language restricting manent committee to monitor imple- H W commercial aquaculture was changed mentation of the plan. A LD E from “shall” to “should” in order to A copy of the plan is available N comply with restrictions in the Shore- on the county’s home page at www Commissioner Ron Wesen signs the sub- line Management Master Program for .skagitcounty.net. area plan into law on January 18. Ferry Construction Moves to Next Phase Work Begins on Temporary Dock for Shutdown By Win Anderson Winning bidder Razz Con- The separate contract for sup- struction started piling work near plying a passenger-only ferry for the Guemes ferry landing January the two-month project will prob- 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Tolling Study Executive Summary
    Seattle Variable Tolling Study Prepared by: in conjunction with and the City of Seattle Department of Transportation May 2009 Seattle Variable Tolling Study Executive Summary CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Study Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Why Tolling? .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Tolling Basics .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Evolution of Tolling ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.5 Report Layout................................................................................................................................. 13 CHAPTER 2. TOLLING CONSIDERATIONS FOR SEATTLE ....................................................................... 14 2.1 Seattle’s Tolling Interests ............................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Legal Considerations .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Chapter Wins National Awards INSIDE: Inside: Profile: SR 14 Pedestrian Tunnel I Swift BRT I Conference Review
    SUMMER 2012 Washington Chapter Wins National Awards INSIDE: Inside: Profile: SR 14 Pedestrian Tunnel I Swift BRT I Conference Review 2601 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98121-1280 2601 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98121-1280 www.apwa-wa.org Federal tax #36-2202880 2012 OFFICERS President Jill M. Marilley, PE Vice President Peter S. Capell 32 14 Secretary Toby D. Rickman Treasurer Michael Clark Past President Jay Burney Features: Board of Directors Term 2011-12 Tara Olsen, PE APWA Spring Conference Review...........................................11 Ruta L. Jones A good time was had by all at the spring conference at Tulalip Resort Casino Hotel, April 3-6, 2012. Don Vondran, PE Nik Stroup Public Works Survey ...............................................................14 Board of Directors Term 2012-13 During the Spring APWA 2012 conference at Tulalip Resort, Reid Middleton conducted a survey Debbie Sullivan to determine the top five industry trends that will affect the public works industry in 2012-2013. Scott Egger, PE Keith Martin, PE Swift Bus Rapid Transit ...........................................................20 Lauren J. Behm Built and operated by Community Transit, in partnership with Everett Transit, Swift was the first BRT service in the state of Washington. Swift is a successful example of an effective arterial BRT Chapter Liaison in a medium-density city. John W. Carpita, PE 206-625-1300, [email protected] Project Profile: SR 14 Pedestrian Tunnel .................................31 Chapter Delegate The Washougal SR 14 Pedestrian Tunnel Project restores the historic link between Washougal’s down- town and the Columbia River waterfront by providing a safe connection for pedestrians and cyclists. Richard McKinley 253-591-5525 [email protected] Washington Wins National Awards .........................................34 The number and prestige of National APWA awards garnered by the Chapter speaks volumes to the caliber of work performed by our public works professionals here in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Transit Development Plan 2014-2019
    DRAFT TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2014-2019 Public Hearing Date – August 20, 2014 1:00pm Burlington City Hall Council Chambers 833 South Spruce Street Burlington, WA. 98233 Traducción: Disponible mediante solicitud. Email: [email protected] Teléfono: 360-757-5179 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ron Wesen Jill Boudreau, Chair Skagit County Commissioner Mayor, Mount Vernon Mike Anderson Kenneth Dahlstedt Mayor, Sedro-Woolley Skagit County Commissioner Laurie Gere Sharon Dillon Mayor Anacortes Skagit County Commissioner Rick DeGloria Steve Sexton, Vice Chair Burlington City Council Mayor, Burlington Dale Ragan Mount Vernon City Council EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dale S. O’Brien MANAGERS Motoko Pleasant, Finance & Administration Troy Fair, Operations Chris Chidley, Information Technologies Ben Haigh, Maintenance & Facilities DRAFT Skagit Transit TDP 2014-2019 3 Introduction Skagit Transit’s Six-Year Transit Development Plan (TDP) identifies how the agency will meet state and local long-range priorities for public transportation through capital improvements, operating changes, and other programs. It also addresses how such programs will be funded. The Plan conforms to the State’s transportation system policy goals (RCW 47.04.280) and supports local comprehensive planning and economic objectives within Skagit County. State transportation system policy goals are: Economic vitality. To promote and develop transportation systems that stimulate, support, and enhance the movement of people and goods to ensure a prosperous economy; Preservation. To maintain, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation systems and services; Safety. To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system; Mobility. To improve the predictable movement of goods and people throughout Washington state; Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Often Costs More Than Ser- Vices That Are Slower Or That Require Transfers
    Trip Planning Tips NORTH SOUND CONNECTIONS GUIDE Plan for time or price: Faster, more direct travel often costs more than ser- vices that are slower or that require transfers. If you can travel at a leisurely pace, you may save money. TRAVEL Plan backward: If you must meet a deadline at your destination, NORTH PUGET SOUND begin by finding the train or bus that meets that deadline. Then plan connections backward to determine when to depart. This technique is useful for trips with transfers. CAR-FREE Start small: If you’re new to car-free travel, start with a few short trips close to home to become familiar with the transportation systems. Travel with a friend, a phone and a little extra cash to allow flexibility and give you the option of taking a different route home. Allow extra time: When planning a connection between different services (between train and ferry, for example), allow enough time for the transfer. If traveling late in the day, prepare a back-up plan in case of weather or other disruptions. Inside: Transportation Connections Map, Sample Trip Plans and Service schedule summaries NORTH SOUND CONNECTIONS GUIDE NORTH-SOUTH DIRECT SERVICES AIRPORTER SHUTTLE | airporter.com | 866-235-5247 www.NorthSoundConnections.com Northbound selected stops For travel between the Seattle area, Vancouver (B.C.), and intermediate points, use these services when you have SeaTac Marysville Burlington Bellingham limited time or wish to travel without transferring. Summary of selected services shown below. 6:00 am 7:10 am 7:55 am 8:30 am TRAVEL Getting around without a car is a great way to teach Using the Transportation Check websites or call for additional departure times and locations.
    [Show full text]