The Omarska Memorial Project As an Example of How Transitional Justice Interventions Can Produce Hidden Harms Sebina Sivac-Bryant*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Omarska Memorial Project As an Example of How Transitional Justice Interventions Can Produce Hidden Harms Sebina Sivac-Bryant* International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2015, 9, 170–180 doi: 10.1093/ijtj/iju023 Advance Access Publication Date: 3 December 2014 Notes from the Field The Omarska Memorial Project as an Example of How Transitional Justice Interventions Can Produce Hidden Harms Sebina Sivac-Bryant* ABSTRACT1 This article uses the example of a failed project, whose aim was to achieve consensus around constructing a memorial at the former Omarska camp in Bosnia and Herzegovina, to illustrate some of the dangers of transitional justice interventions involving victims of dislocation and violence, as well as the potential for hidden harms. It is based on nine years of ethnographic research into a small returnee community in Kozarac, in the municipality of Prijedor. Well-intentioned as the project undoubtedly was, it had unintended consequences for the social relations of the local community. Like other internationally led initiatives, it can be argued that it helped reinforce a vic- tim-perpetrator dynamic that prevented rather than assisted progress. Although we cannot draw too many conclusions from one project, the issues highlighted by this ini- tiative have been echoed on a smaller scale in much of the international involvement of transitional justice scholars and activists in the town since then. KEYWORDS: Omarska camp, memorialization, victims, returnees, Bosnia and Herzegovina OMARSKA CAMP After Bosnian Serb forces’ takeover of Prijedor on 30 April 1992 and as part of a systematic attempt by Serb nationalists to ethnically cleanse non-Serbs from areas of Bosnia that were earmarked to become Greater Serbia, camps were established at Omarska, Keraterm and Trnopolje. Omarska camp operated from 25 May to 21 August 1992, on the site of an iron ore mine. During this time, more than 3,000 Bosnian Muslims and Croats were confined, suffering cruelty and torture, 37 women were repeatedly raped and 500–900 people are estimated to have perished.2 * Independent Researcher. Email: [email protected] 1 This article is based on my doctoral thesis, ‘An Ethnography of Contested Return: Re-Making Kozarac,’ University College London, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, UK. 2 ‘The International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Charges 21 Serbs with Atrocities Committed Inside and Outside the Omarska Death Camp,’ UN Doc. CC/PIO/004-E (13 February 1995). VC The Author (2014). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email [email protected] 170 Omarska Memorial: How TJ Can Produce Hidden Harms 171 Roy Gutman of Newsday magazine reported the first rumours about the camp,3 before an ITN television crew and Guardian journalist Ed Vulliamy visited Omarska on 5 August.4 The resulting images of emaciated, terrified inmates shocked the world and led to calls for a war crimes commission, following which the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established. The first Hague indictee, Dusˇko Tadic´, was a local Serb from Kozarac, a predominantly Bosniak town near Omarska. In total, 19 individuals were charged with the crimes that occurred in Omarska camp. Testimonies of systematic rape in the camp, gath- ered by two female inmates, were instrumental in recognizing rape as a war crime for the first time. It is hard to exaggerate Omarska camp’s central role, and the stories of torture and murder that occurred there, in the traumatic memory of events surround- ing the ethnic cleansing of this area in 1992. APPROACHING MITTAL STEEL In November 2004, the multinational giant Mittal Steel acquired a majority stake in the iron mine company Ljubija Rudnik in Prijedor, which runs the Omarska mine. Local returnees believed this would create an opportunity to commemorate the site, given the company’s commitment to corporate social responsibility. A survivor now living in Holland, Satko Mujagic´, and several other individuals and local organizations, including Srcem do Mira (Through Heart to Peace) and Izvor (Source), wrote to the new owner of the mine asking to be allowed to create a memorial on the site in order to help heal the wounds of the survivors is to acknowledge what happened. That is why we are appealing to you to dedicate part of this special place to the memory of what happened there only 12 years ago...Your company owns a place with a legacy. Although you are not responsible for what happened there, I hope that you will look compassionately upon our request so that the past will never be forgotten.5 Bosniak citizens who had returned after the war to reestablish the local commu- nity felt strongly that a memorial to Omarska camp would be a far more useful and locally relevant initiative than the distant war crimes process – ‘a fantastic opportun- ity to tackle the past,’6 as one put it. Both private and public online discussions took place about the possible final shape of the memorial. Much of this discussion was caveated by the wish not to be too ‘demanding’ or ‘insensitive’ towards the Serb community, which held a generally antagonistic view of the project. THE MEDIATORS: SOUL OF EUROPE Mittal responded by appointing a small British charity, Soul of Europe (SoE), to take the project forward. It consisted of a former priest, Donald Reeves, and his colleague 3 Roy Gutman, ‘Hidden Horror,’ New York Newsday, 19 July 1992; Roy Gutman, ‘Death Camps,’ New York Newsday, 2 August 1992. 4 Ed Vulliamy, ‘Shame of Camp Omarska,’ Guardian, 7 August 1992. 5 Optimisti 2004 Foundation, Holland, October 2004, on file with author. 6 Personal interview, project participant, Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 9 June 2010. 172 S. Sivac-Bryant Peter Pelz. Their mandate was to work locally among all communities to achieve a solution that would create a process of mediation to ‘bring Serbs and Bosniaks and Croats together to agree on a proposal for a memorial.’7 SoE had been involved in the former Yugoslavia since 2000, mostly working with religious leaders in Belgrade, Serbia, and Banja Luka, the capital of Republika Srpska – the Serb-run entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In talks with Mittal, they stressed their friendship with the Serbian Church in Banja Luka and its leaders, who had been brought over to England for debates and interfaith dialogue.8 In their initial proposal, SoE stated that the mediation project ‘leaves consider- ation of the place, the type of memorial and those who should be remembered as a matter for debate.’9 In essence, the project never guaranteed to accede to the sur- vivors’ request to commemorate the specific site of the former camp, although this was not fully understood by those from the community who supported the initiative. SoE acknowledged that the collective trauma of Kozarac10 and its inhabitants was something that needed to be dealt with carefully, and hoped that by bringing to- gether different ethnic groups to plan a memorial, they might create the basis for a wider process of reconciliation in Bosnia. Looking back, the set up of the project sug- gests that they were more interested in creating a showpiece reconciliation project than a memorial. A FRAMEWORK OF MEDIATION: CRITICAL YEAST, NOT CRITICAL MASS SoE’s methods and strategies aimed to create a ‘critical yeast’ as opposed to a ‘critical mass’ – a catalyst for a solution, rather than the solution itself.11 They began working with a core group comprising significant members of the communities involved, with the idea that they would then influence their respective communities. There were to be three stages to this process: 1. Identify significant community members; 2. Organize round tables and workshops among the chosen members; and 3. Begin moving towards a memorial. Whilst there were no ‘fixed sides’ or a fixed number of members allowed within these talks, the reality was that mediators chose certain individuals to negotiate whilst others were excluded. ‘Critical yeast’ meant targeting powerful or prominent commu- nity members rather than approaching survivors or local activists. On the Serb side, they involved three Serb women from the mine’s management team and a former mine manager who was in charge of the mine during the time of the camp, Ostoja Marjanovic´. He acknowledged on several occasions that the mine vehicles, for ex- ample, had been used for carrying bodies and digging mass graves. 7 Peter Pelz and Donald Reeves, The White House: From Fear to a Handshake (London: O Books, 2008), 7. 8 Soul of Europe, ’A Project of Mediation: Between Serbs, Bosniaks and Croats for a Memorial for Those Killed in the Bosnian War in the District of Prijedor’ (unpublished document, 2005). 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Pelz and Reeves, supra n 7 at 110. Omarska Memorial: How TJ Can Produce Hidden Harms 173 Over the course of the mediation, SoE frequently visited the most important man in Prijedor, Mayor Marko Pavic´, ‘the godfather of the town,’12 to seek his support. Two other men who had been interrogators in the camp were also involved in the talks, which Bosniak participants considered an outrage. Among Bosniaks, there were three Omarska survivors: Nusreta Sivac, a former judge; Rezak Hukanovic´, a journal- ist and author of a book about Omarska, The Tenth Circle of Hell: A Memoir of Life in the Death Camps of Bosnia; and Muharem Murselovic´, a local politician. The main interlocutor from Kozarac was Emsuda Mujagic´ from Srcem do Mira. Local managers of the project were also appointed: a young returnee, Anel (Murselovic´’s nephew), and a Serb refugee from Croatia, Zoran, who SoE hoped would work together to help build common purpose among the participants. I got to know two participants from the ‘Serb side,’ both of whom had a mixed ethnic background. Vedran’s father was one of the only local Serbs to publicly recog- nize the crimes committed against Bosniaks in Prijedor.
Recommended publications
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisad 'Šiško' Jakupović
    Nisad ‘Šiško’ Jakupović Nisad is from Prijedor in Bosnia. He was imprisoned in the notorious Omarska Concentration Camp with four of his brothers in 1992. ‘I was under arrest at a local school sports pitch, and there was a guard – a former desk mate from school and close neighbour – who ignored me when I clearly needed help. Yet there was a similar situation where another familiar face, someone I knew less well, chose to help me out.’ Nisad was born on 30 April 1965 in Prijedor, a town and region in the north-west of Bosnia, (then part of Yugoslavia). A year later Nisad’s parents decided to move him and his 10 brothers and sisters to a village called Kevljani, a few kilometres from the town of Prijedor. His father worked on the railway, along with three of his brothers, whilst his mother stayed at home. Nisad and his siblings were pupils at the secondary school in Omarska. Growing up, Nisad remembers Kevljani as a diverse community of Bosnian Muslims (known as Bosniaks) and Serbs. Nisad and his family were Bosnian Muslims, and he remembers everyone lived alongside each other with little conflict or tension. Nisad studied geology for four years, but after being unsuccessful in finding a job, as was the case with many young people at the time, he moved to Croatia to work as a labourer. Nisad regularly returned home to his family in Kevljani, but in the 1990s, there was a civil conflict and war in the region, and Yugoslavia began to be broken up into separate countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ? Xavier Bougarel
    Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ? Xavier Bougarel To cite this version: Xavier Bougarel. Bosnia-Herzegovina - How Much Did Islam Matter ?. Journal of Modern European History, Munich : C.H. Beck, London : SAGE 2018, XVI, pp.164 - 168. 10.17104/1611-8944-2018-2- 164. halshs-02546552 HAL Id: halshs-02546552 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02546552 Submitted on 18 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 « Bosnia-Herzegovina – How Much Did Islam Matter ? », Journal of Modern European History, vol. XVI, n° 2, 2018, pp.164-168. Xavier Bougarel The Bosniaks, both victims and actors in the Yugoslav crisis Referred to as ‘Muslims’ (in the national meaning of the term) until 1993, the Bosniaks were the main victims of the breakup of Yugoslavia. During the war that raged in Bosnia- Herzegovina from April 1992 until December 1995, 97,000 people were killed: 65.9% of them were Bosniaks, 25.6% Serbs and 8.0% Croats. Of the 40,000 civilian victims, 83.3% were Bosniaks. Moreover, the Bosniaks represented the majority of the 2.1 million people displaced by wartime combat and by the ‘ethnic cleansing’ perpetrated by the ‘Republika Srpska’ (‘Serb Republic’) and, on a smaller scale, the ‘Croat Republic of Herceg-Bosna’.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1233Kb)
    Original citation: Koinova, Maria and Karabegovic, Dzeneta . (2016) Diasporas and transitional justice : transnational activism from local to global levels of engagement. Global Networks (Oxford): a journal of transnational affairs . Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/83210 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Koinova, Maria and Karabegovic, Dzeneta . (2016) Diasporas and transitional justice : transnational activism from local to global levels of engagement. Global Networks (Oxford): a journal of transnational affairs ., which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/glob.12128 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving." A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bosnian Case: Art, History and Memory
    The Bosnian Case: Art, History and Memory Elmedin Žunić ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3694-7098 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Melbourne Faculty of Fine Arts and Music July 2018 Abstract The Bosnian Case: Art, History and Memory concerns the representation of historic and traumatogenic events in art through the specific case of the war in Bosnia 1992-1995. The research investigates an aftermath articulated through the Freudian concept of Nachträglichkeit, rebounding on the nature of representation in the art as always in the space of an "afterness". The ability to represent an originary traumatic scenario has been questioned in the theoretics surrounding this concept. Through The Bosnian Case and its art historical precedents, the research challenges this line of thinking, identifying, including through fieldwork in Bosnia in 2016, the continuation of the war in a war of images. iii Declaration This is to certify that: This dissertation comprises only my original work towards the PhD except where indicated. Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used. This dissertation is approximately 40,000 words in length, exclusive of figures, references and appendices. Signature: Elmedin Žunić, July 2018 iv Acknowledgements First and foremost, my sincere thanks to my supervisors Dr Bernhard Sachs and Ms Lou Hubbard. I thank them for their guidance and immense patience over the past four years. I also extend my sincere gratitude to Professor Barbara Bolt for her insightful comments and trust. I thank my fellow candidates and staff at VCA for stimulating discussions and support.
    [Show full text]
  • NUSRETA SIVAC's VOICE
    VOICES Check against delivery 24 April 2009 NUSRETA SIVAC’s VOICE “My name is Nusreta Sivac and I come from Prijedor, a city in northwest part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Before I share my very difficult experience in the concentration camp in Omarska, I would like to say that I am very happy to see that the tradition of Voices continues. I am also pleased to see some of the participants at the Voices from South Africa in 2001. For me it is very important that we have been given another opportunity to speak and that our voices are heard again. In April 1992 the Bosnian Serbs took forcibly power in Prijedor, that with the help of police, the former Yugoslav army (who at that time was composed of only Serbs) and the paramilitary forces from Serbia. In Prijedor the majority population was of Bosnian Bosniaks (Muslims), then Serbs (Ortodox Christians), Croats (Catholics) and other minority communities. Soon after Serbs took power, the areas populated by Muslims and Croats were started to be granated, houses were plundered, burned and then completely destroyed. ‘Ciscenje’ or ‘Cleaning’ was the terminology Serbs used for ethnic cleansing of Muslims and Croats. All the Muslim and Croat population in those areas was taken to the existing concentration camps. Later on men and women were divided, men would remain in the concentration camps and majority of women and children were later gathered in tracks and taken close to the borders of the Federation from where they sought protection of the Bosnian army. In the city of Prijedor at that time, freedom of movement was strictly limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Criminal Tribunal
    MICT-13-55-A 2970 A2970-A2901 15 March 2017 AJ THE MECHANISM FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS No. MICT-13-55-A IN THE APPEALS CHAMBER Before: Judge Theodor Meron Judge William Hussein Sekule Judge Vagn Prusse Joensen Judge Jose Ricardo de Prada Solaesa Judge Graciela Susana Gatti Santana Registrar: Mr Olufemi Elias Date Filed: 15 March 2017 THE PROSECUTOR v. RADOVAN KARADZIC Public Redacted Version RADOVAN KARADZIC’S RESPONSE BRIEF ________________________________________________________________________ Office of the Prosecutor: Laurel Baig Barbara Goy Katrina Gustafson Counsel for Radovan Karadzic Peter Robinson Kate Gibson No. MICT-13-55-A 2969 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 4 II. THE PROSECUTION’S APPEAL .................................................................................. 5 1. The Excluded Crimes were Rightly Excluded .............................................................. 5 A. The Trial Chamber committed no legal error in identifying another reasonable inference ...................................................................................................... 7 B. The finding that the Excluded Crimes did not form part of the JCE was reasonable .................................................................................................................... 10 1. The Trial Chamber never found that President Karadzic knew the Excluded Crimes were necessary to achieve the common criminal purpose.........
    [Show full text]
  • A Memorial in Exile in London's Olympics: Orbits of Responsibility
    A memorial in exile in London’s Olympics: orbits of responsibility opendemocracy.net /susan-schuppli/memorial-in-exile-in-london%E2%80%99s-olympics-orbits-of- responsibility Susan Schuppli Two sets of extraordinary statistics attached to contemporary events are not connected to each other in a relationship of cause and effect but through a chain of associations and a series of responsibilities not faced and thus acted upon. In 2005 ArcelorMittal made a commitment to finance and build a memorial on the grounds of Omarska, the site of the most notorious concentration camp of the Bosnian war. Twenty years after the war crimes committed there, still no space of public commemoration exists. Grounds, buildings, and equipment once used for extermination now serve a commercial enterprise run by the world’s largest steel producer. In the absence of this promised memorial, London’s Olympic landmark - the ArcelorMittal Orbit - must be reclaimed as The Omarska Memorial in Exile. ArcelorMittal Orbit (designed by Anish Kapoor/ Cecil Balmond). Image courtesy of ArcelorMittal. All rights reserved. Access denied The story that links London to Omarska forcefully came to my attention when a group of us from Goldsmiths University of London, the Belgrade/Prijedor/Graz- based collective working group on the ‘Four Faces of Omarska’ along with survivors of the persecutions of the Bosnian war drove around the perimeter of the Omarska mining complex on April 13. Were it not for the survivors’ moving personal accounts and commitment to helping us comprehend the tragic events, we might well have succumbed to a form of dark tourism as our bus moved through a landscape still drained of colour after the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1
    Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Handbook 1. This handbook provides basic reference information on Bosnia and Herzegovina, including its geography, history, government, military forces, and communications and transportation networks. This information is intended to familiarize military personnel with local customs and area knowledge to assist them during their assignment to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. This product is published under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense Intelligence Production Program (DoDIPP) with the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity designated as the community coordinator for the Country Handbook Program. This product reflects the coordinated U.S. Defense Intelligence Community position on Bosnia and Herzegovina. 3. Dissemination and use of this publication is restricted to official military and government personnel from the United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, NATO member countries, and other countries as required and designated for support of coalition operations. 4. The photos and text reproduced herein have been extracted solely for research, comment, and information reporting, and are intended for fair use by designated personnel in their official duties, including local reproduction for training. Further dissemination of copyrighted material contained in this document, to include excerpts and graphics, is strictly prohibited under Title 17, U.S. Code. Contents KEY FACTS. 1 U.S. MISSION . 2 U.S. Embassy. 2 U.S. Consulate . 2 Entry Requirements . 3 Currency . 3 Customs . 3 GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE . 4 Geography . 4 Topography . 5 Vegetation . 8 Effects on Military Operations . 9 Climate. 10 TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION . 13 Transportation . 13 Roads . 13 Rail . 15 Air . 16 Maritime . 17 Communication . 18 Radio and Television . 18 Telephone and Telegraph .
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Wartime Rape in Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Remembering Wartime Rape in Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina Sarah Quillinan ORCHID ID: 0000-0002-5786-9829 A dissertation submitted in total fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2019 School of Social and Political Sciences University of Melbourne THIS DISSERTATION IS DEDICATED TO THE WOMEN SURVIVORS OF WAR RAPE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA WHOSE STRENGTH, FORTITUDE, AND SPIRIT ARE TRULY HUMBLING. i Contents Dedication / i Declaration / iv Acknowledgments / v Abstract / vii Note on Language and Pronunciation / viii Abbreviations / ix List of Illustrations / xi I PROLOGUE Unclaimed History: Memoro-Politics and Survivor Silence in Places of Trauma / 1 II INTRODUCTION After Silence: War Rape, Trauma, and the Aesthetics of Social Remembrance / 10 Where Memory and Politics Meet: Remembering Rape in Post-War Bosnia / 11 Situating the Study: Fieldwork Locations / 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Ethnographic Sketch / 22 The Village of Selo: Republika Srpska / 26 The Town of Gradić: Republika Srpska / 28 Silence and the Making of Ethnography: Methodological Framework / 30 Ethical Considerations: Principles and Practices of Research on Rape Trauma / 36 Organisation of Dissertation / 41 III CHAPTER I The Social Inheritance of War Trauma: Collective Memory, Gender, and War Rape / 45 On Collective Memory and Social Identity / 46 On Collective Memory and Gender / 53 On Collective Memory and the History of Wartime Rape / 58 Conclusion: The Living Legacy of Collective Memory in Bosnia and Herzegovina / 64 ii IV CHAPTER II The Unmaking
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Plan 1 Lesson 1 of 3 – a Personal Experience of the Bosnian War
    The Forgiveness Project Forgiving the Unforgivable – Lesson Plan 1 Lesson 1 of 3 – A personal experience of the Bosnian War Kemal Pervanic’s story – Part 1 55 mins (film duration 9 mins) © 2017 The Forgiveness Project | www.theforgivenessproject.com A personal experience of the Bosnian War Please ensure the staff member facilitating this lesson has an understanding of the Bosnian War. A timeline is at the end of this lesson plan. This short clip (7 mins) from the 1995 BBC documentary, Death of Yugoslavia, sets out the process and scale of ethnic cleansing during the Bosnian War: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbNocQORWQ8. Please note this contains very graphic scenes and is not suitable to be shown to the students. Lesson objective: 1. To be able to explain the personal experience of someone who has lived through the Bosnian War. Key vocabulary: Yugoslavia, nationalism, persecuted, concentration camp, Omarska camp, Prijedor massacre, demonise. Teacher activity Learner activity Time Who is Kemal Pervanic / Profile of Kemal Read the passage in the 5 mins Invite students to read the passage in their student booklet in student booklet and pairs and to complete the profile of Kemal as a teenager. complete the profile. Kemal Pervanic’s story / Film notes Watch the film and make 20 mins Introduce the story and the ground rules. Watch the film and notes or write questions ask students to make notes or questions throughout the film of throughout the film of any any words they don’t fully understand or parts of the story they words you don’t fully would like to discuss afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Information Sheet
    NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT CASE INFORMATION SHEET “OMARSKA, KERATERM & TRNOPOLJE CAMPS” (IT-98-30/1) KVOĈKA et al. The Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvočka, Dragoljub Prcać, Milojica Kos, Mlađo Radić & Zoran Žigić MIROSLAV KVOĈKA Professional police officer attached to the Omarska police station; participated in the operation of the Omarska camp in north-western Bosnia and Herzegovina as the functional equivalent of the deputy commander of the guard service - Sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment Crimes convicted of (examples): Persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds (crimes against humanity) • Kvoĉka held a high-ranking position in the Omarska camp and had a degree of authority over the guards. • He had sufficient influence to prevent or halt some of the abuses but rarely made use of that influence. • He was present while crimes were committed and was undoubtedly aware that crimes of extreme physical and mental violence were routinely inflicted upon the non-Serbs imprisoned in the camp. Murder and torture (violation of the laws or customs of war) • He was a co-perpetrator as part of a joint criminal enterprise (JCE) in the murder of two detainees held at the camp. As part of the JCE, he instigated, committed or otherwise aided and abetted the torture and beating of Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat prisoners by his approval and encouragement or acquiescence to the acts. DRAGOLJUB PRCAĆ Retired policeman and crime technician mobilised to serve in the Omarska police station on 29 April 1992; administrative aide to the commander of the Omarska camp - Sentenced to 5 years’ imprisonment Crimes convicted of (examples): Persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds (crimes against humanity), • Prcać was aware of the crimes of extreme physical and mental violence routinely inflicted upon the non-Serbs detained in the camp.
    [Show full text]