DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 55/Tuesday, March 24, 2009/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 55/Tuesday, March 24, 2009/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices 12445 received into any of our dockets by the public participation in the EIS process ADDRESSES: Comments will be accepted name of the individual submitting the (including providing comments on the at the public scoping meetings or they comment (or signing the comment, if scope of the Draft Environmental Impact may be sent to Ms. Dolores Roybal submitted on behalf of an association, Statement (DEIS), to announce that Saltarelli, AICP, Project Manager, Los business, labor union, etc.). You may public scoping meetings will be Angeles County Metropolitan review DOT’s complete Privacy Act conducted, and to identify participating Transportation Authority, One Gateway Statement in the Federal Register and cooperating agency contacts. Plaza, Mail Stop? Los Angeles, CA published on April 11, 2000 (Volume DATES: Written comments on the scope 90012, or via e-mail at 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). of the EIS, including the project’s [email protected]. The locations of the Issued in Washington, DC on March 18, purpose and need, the alternatives to be public scoping meetings are given above 2009. considered, the impacts to be evaluated, under DATES. Grady C. Cothen, Jr., and the methodologies to be used in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety evaluations should be sent to LACMTA Ray Tellis, Team Leader, Los Angeles Standards and Program Development. on or before May 11, 2009 at the address Metropolitan Office, Federal Transit ADDRESSES [FR Doc. E9–6400 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am] below. See below for the Administration, 888 South Figueroa address to which written public BILLING CODE 4910–06–P Street, Suite 1850, Los Angeles, CA comments may be sent. Public scoping 90017, phone (213) 202–3950, e-mail meetings to accept comments on the [email protected]. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION scope of the EIS/EIR will be held on the following dates: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • Federal Transit Administration Monday, March 30, 2009; 4:30 p.m. Scoping to 6 p.m.; at the University of Southern Intent To Prepare an Environmental California (USC), Alumni Room, The FTA and LACMTA invite all Impact Statement for Proposed Transit Davidson Conference Center, 3415 S interested individuals and Improvements in the Regional Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90007. organizations, public agencies, and Connector Transit Corridor, Los • Tuesday, March 31, 2009; 6:30 p.m. Native American Tribes to comment on Angeles, CA to 8 p.m.; at the Lake Avenue Church, the scope of the EIS, including the 393 N Lake Avenue, Pasadena, CA project’s purpose and need, the AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, 91101. alternatives to be studied, the impacts to DOT. • Wednesday, April 1, 2009; 6:30 be evaluated, and the evaluation ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an p.m. to 8 p.m.; at the Japanese American methods to be used. Comments should environmental impact statement. National Museum (JANM), 369 E 1st focus on: Alternatives that may be less Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. costly or have less environmental or SUMMARY: The Federal Transit • Thursday, April 2, 2009; Noon to community impacts while achieving Administration (FTA) and the Los 1:30 p.m.; at the Los Angeles Central similar transportation objectives, and Angeles County Metropolitan Library, Board Room, 630 W 5th Street, the identification of any significant Transportation Authority (LACMTA) Los Angeles, CA 90071. social, economic, or environmental intends to prepare an environmental The project’s purpose and need and issues relating to the alternatives. impact statement (EIS) for the Regional the description of alternatives for the Project Initiation Connector Transit Corridor Project in proposed project will be presented at Los Angeles County, California. these meetings. The buildings used for The FTA and LACMTA will prepare LACMTA operates the Metro transit the scoping meetings are accessible to an Environmental Impact Statement/ system in Los Angeles County. The persons with disabilities. Any Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) proposed project would provide a direct individual who requires special for the Regional Connector Transit link connecting several light rail service assistance, such as a sign language Corridor pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139 and lines in operation or in construction interpreter, to participate in the scoping the California Environmental Quality through downtown Los Angeles, CA. meeting should contact Ms. Ann Act (CEQA). LACMTA is serving as the The project area lies entirely within Kerman, Community Relations Manager, local lead agency for purposes of CEQA the City of Los Angeles and is within LACMTA, at (213) 922–7671, or environmental clearance, and FTA is the densely developed downtown core [email protected]. serving as the federal lead agency for that includes multi-family residences, Scoping materials will be available at purposes of National Environmental industrial and public lands, commercial the meetings and on the LACMTA Web Policy Act (NEPA) environmental and retail establishments, government site (http://www.metro.net/ clearance. This notice shall alert office buildings, and private high-rise regionalconnector). Paper copies of the interested parties to the preparation of office towers. scoping materials may also be obtained the EIS/EIR, describe the alternatives The EIS will be prepared in from Ms. Ann Kerman, Community under consideration, invite public accordance with the requirements of the Relations Manager, LACMTA, at (213) participation in the EIS/EIR process, National Environmental Policy Act 922–7671, or [email protected]. An and announce the public scoping (NEPA) and its implementing interagency scoping meeting will be meetings. FTA and LACMTA will invite regulations. LACMTA will also use the held on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at interested Federal, State, tribal, regional EIS document to comply with the 1:30 p.m. at LACMTA, in the Gateway and local government agencies to be California Environmental Quality Act Plaza Room, One Gateway Plaza, Los participating agencies under the (CEQA), which requires an Angeles, CA 90012. Representatives of provisions of section 6002 of Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Native American tribal governments and SAFETEA–LU. purpose of this notice is to alert of all Federal, State, regional and local interested parties regarding the intent to agencies that may have an interest in Purpose and Need for the Project prepare the EIS, to provide information any aspect of the project will be invited The purpose of this project is to on the nature of the proposed project to be participating or cooperating improve the region’s public transit and possible alternatives, to invite agencies, as appropriate. service and mobility. The overall goal of VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:06 Mar 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES 12446 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices the project is to improve mobility Flower Street) to the Metro Gold Line few blocks so as to provide full coverage within the corridor by connecting to the (Pasadena and Eastside) at the Little of the area. Each shuttle route would be light rail service of the Metro Gold Line Tokyo/Arts District Station at 1st Street one and one-half to two miles in length. to Pasadena, the Metro Gold Line and Alameda Street. This connection At-Grade Emphasis LRT Alternative: Eastside Extension, the Metro Blue Line, would provide through service between This alternative would extend from the and the Metro Expo Line. This link the Metro Blue Line to Long Beach, the underground 7th Street/Metro Center would serve communities across the Metro Gold Line to Pasadena and East Station, head north under Flower Street, region, allowing greater accessibility Los Angeles, and the Metro Expo Line surface to at-grade north of 5th Street, while serving population and to Culver City. With the implementation cross 3rd Street, enter Bunker Hill, and employment growth in downtown Los of the Regional Connector project, these turn northeast through a new entrance Angeles. Mobility issues throughout the four lines would share tracks and to the existing 2nd Street tunnel. The region and the identified need to join stations in downtown Los Angeles. alignment would continue along 2nd the unconnected segments of the light The various alternatives to be Street where it would split into an at- rail system have been documented in considered for the Regional Connector grade couplet configuration on Main several past studies, including the project generally traverse Flower Street and Los Angeles Streets (one track on Pasadena—Los Angeles Light Rail north from 7th Street, 2nd Street each roadway) to Temple Street. Then it Transit Project Environmental Impact between Flower and Alameda, Main and would head east on Temple Street and Report (1993), the Blue Line Connection Los Angeles Streets between Temple realign into a dual track configuration Preliminary Planning Study (1993), and Street and 2nd Street, Temple Street just north of the Metro Gold Line Little the Regional Light Rail Connector Study between City Hall and Alameda Street, Tokyo/Arts District Station on Alameda (2004). and Alameda Street between U.S. Street. Due to the high volume of trains Additional considerations supporting Highway 101 and 2nd Street. that would traverse the Regional the need for the Regional Connector Connector, an automobile underpass Alternatives Transit Corridor project include: and pedestrian overpass would be Increased travel times and station The Regional Connector Transit constructed at the intersection of overcrowding occurring due to multiple Corridor Final Alternatives Analysis Temple and Alameda Streets to transfers required to traverse the project Report (2009) prepared by LACMTA eliminate pedestrian-train and area; a project area that has many transit identified four alternatives for further automobile-train conflicts. dependent residents; poor system consideration in the EIS/EIR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In for Inclusion, Justice, and Prosperity October 27–29, Los Angeles
    All in for inclusion, justice, and prosperity October 27–29, Los Angeles www.equity2015.org 1 Dear Friends and Colleagues, On behalf of the board and staf of PolicyLink, welcome to Los Angeles and to Equity Summit 2015: All in for inclusion, justice, and prosperity. Your time is valuable and we’re honored you’ve chosen to spend some of it with us. We hope you will have an uplifting experience that ofers opportunities to reconnect with colleagues, meet new people, learn, share, stretch, and strength- en your commitment to building an equitable society in which all reach their full potential. The PolicyLink team will do all we can to make your experience meaningful. If you need assistance, let us know. If you don’t know us yet, look for badges with “staf” on them. We’re pleased that you’re here and excited about the program ahead of us. Angela Glover Blackwell President and CEO 2 Equity Summit 2015 All in for inclusion, justice, and prosperity Our Partners and Sponsors For tHeir generous support of Equity Leading Partners Summit 2015, we tHank: • The Kresge Foundation • W.K. Kellogg Foundation • Citi Community Development Partners • The Annie E. Casey Foundation • The California Endowment • The California Wellness Foundation • The Convergence Partnership • Ford Foundation • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Sponsors • The James Irvine Foundation • JP Morgan Chase & Co. • Marguerite Casey Foundation • Prudential • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation • The Rockefeller Foundation • Surdna Foundation • Walter and Elise Haas Fund 3 Delegation
    [Show full text]
  • 884-5 111 Places in LA That You Must Not Miss.Pdf
    © Emons Verlag GmbH All rights reserved All photos © Lyudmila Zotova, except: Boone Children’s Gallery (p. 31) – Photo © Museum Associates/LACMA; Kayaking on LA River (p. 123) – LA River Kayak Safari; L.A. Derby Dolls (p. 125) – Photo by Marc Campos, L.A. Derby Dolls; Machine Project (p. 133, top image) – Photo of Josh Beckman’s Sea Nymph courtesy of Machine Project; Museum of Broken Relationships (p. 141) – Courtesy of the Museum of Broken Relationships; Norton Simon Museum (p. 157) – Norton Simon Art Foundation; Te Source Restaurant (p. 195, top image) – Te Source Family after morning meditation, photo by Isis Aquarian courtesy of Isis Aquarian Source Archives; Wildlife Waystation (p. 227) – Photo by Billy V Vaughn, Wildlife Waystation Art credits: Machine Project (p. 133, top image) – Sea Nymph by the artist Josh Beckman; Velveteria (p. 217) – artwork pictured reprinted by permission of the artists: Caren Anderson (Liberace in blue vest); Caren Anderson & Cenon (center Liberace); Jennifer Kenworth aka Juanita’s Velvets (Liberace with red cape); CeCe Rodriguez (poodle in square frame, left of center Liberace) © Cover icon Montage: iStockphoto.com/bebecom98, iStockphoto.com/Davel5957 Design: Eva Kraskes, based on a design by Lübbeke | Naumann | Toben Edited by Katrina Fried Maps: altancicek.design, www.altancicek.de Printing and binding: B.O.S.S Medien GmbH, Goch Printed in Germany 2016 ISBN 978-3-95451-884-5 First edition Did you enjoy it? Do you want more? Join us in uncovering new places around the world on: www.111places.com Foreword Dear Los Angeles, So often you are misunderstood, viewed by the world through the narrow lenses of the media and outsiders.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionl Connector Transit Corridor Draft DEIS/DEIR
    Regional Connector Transit Corridor Cultural Resources – Built Environment Technical Memorandum were designed to legally and financially assist cities to address problems of decay and neglect within their communities. In response to this new legislation, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (CRA) was established in 1948, in part to cure economic "blight" by funding and overseeing redevelopment. As its first major project, the CRA sought to improve the Bunker Hill area, which had been one of the more exclusive residential neighborhoods at the turn of the twentieth century but had deteriorated and fallen out of fashion. Despite many proposals, plans to redevelop Bunker Hill were rejected, and ultimately not begun until the 1960s, when large hotels and Victorian-era homes were bulldozed and the landforms were rearranged. Slowly, over the past 50 years, a community of high-rises has been constructed in their place (Kawaratani 2008). When the Harbor Freeway (Interstate-110) was completed in 1952, it was hopefully called “downtown’s new Main Street” by noted local architect A. C. Martin, Jr. (Los Angeles Times 1967). Construction of the freeway and the repeal of the building height ordinance in 1954 created a significant new concentration of high- and midrise buildings, eventually concentrated on Figueroa and 7th Streets. The downtown civic center began to take shape in the post-war era. As discussed in California: A Land of Contrast: Business blocks of the late nineteenth century have been replaced by the Civic Center, whose buildings, most of contemporary design, are flanked by multi-acre parking lots. The Civic Center has encroached westward upon Bunker Hill, once occupied by the city’s wealthier residents and now experiencing impressive [redevelopment] (Lantis, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Event Center
    OV,\l'l.\l&Hf YI' t ITV ,iAN'YINot: C ITY OF LOS ANGELES ~1, .. '-• ...~ '-~~•111... u, ' "'""'" • 1: ) .w..111 :A,:tM:l<:t.c:A 11'1.1~ CAu-'<>MMA :O •Jto\"' .....:a n • '-l4JV•" "'Mli",O\ ... JJ> t••~••'~'' ,V,.. ►flt..AC• """"\M~,'- ' ,.,, Cff\l!'l'OUC:"~ t c;r;y " ,.. ..... N( ,"!0... Wli~ 1J•f.Jltt, : ,, Wl,,l~Yi(,11t!lt,V_. ... 1,t.... M \\I r :/11 11,-'( ,' __ I-':"... ~ 1«Jl't,. "'- l lltt• 111(..,_,.,,. vo1, , .......... IVN ;; ,, ,.. t ... n.~ v.. ~t"r. 01.:::oc,icao ):f-hL~ 1,1UC J 1ifN,,r.J.,MH­ u,,;.,.-..•~!J '., \(N ~~ ,:.......~hi ... ·~, 1fl,,\f\- 1.#ttl!H~ WJ~lltl l,Wtl .,.,. ::•"'"'"'"' 1.-.i... _ .-j,ui._ , -.....,. ~., ...,, ........,~ .. f\,11:t:,.•~ oJ • )it:11,.1.)« H~ Antooo R Volara,g0$,i! Mayor Ci1y ot l.os ~oles City Han, Room 300 Los Angele~. CA 90012 Attcnti<>n: Ms. Gaye Willams c.. ar M;rJ<)( Vllar'"9Q'x!' MAYOR'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTIVE NO. 22 DOWNTOWN EVENT carre:R PLANNING Th-e Executive Oirective V'3S issued dJe :O 3le- ~ifalnce of tt.~ Cofl\-ention and Event Center Project Jo, Los An9e.'es. The goal ls to n-.a,omiza the con,.-t>Jtion ol lh9 Fannor's F,eld pn,j~ lo U-.e economic ~rowth. CMC ife and tvabiliy ol Downtown Los Angel9s- The Execurvo Dtrw.-ve ~ up the coordrnle<I actions ol Uie Depar.menl$ of City f'lanning, Tr~ooo. f'\Jbic Works, Conventior. Cen,e, arid CulllJ'at Affo>h. The Cty Oepar.me.'l1S -ed together 10 M!Ue that thoughtful design, axh~eclure, :iro ptaruw,g aro efll)loyed in Ole review ol tile project.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2021-22 City – Submitted Proposed Project List
    Draft City Submitted - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Local Streets and Roads List of Projects *Projects listed are consistent with Streets and Highways Code Sections 2030(b)(1) and 2034(a)(1) August 19, 2021 Fiscal Year Initially Proposed Project Est Assembly Senate City County Project Type Title Description Location Components Est Start Est Useful Life Proposed Status Completion Districts Districts For this year, staff will focus on selecting streets from the West Road Maintenance & 2021 Pavement Management This project will include: Paving and/or Striping Rehab/Repair (Existing Safety), Alameda Alameda 21/22 New End zone, which is located between the western limits of the City Construction 07/2021 06/2022 4-20 18 9 Rehabilitation Project Pavement Rehab/Repair (Existing), Bicycle Lane Rehab/Repair (Existing) of Alameda and Grand Street. *Browning Street from Addison Street to Dwight Way *Colusa Avenue from North City Limit to Solano Avenue *Delaware Street from Acton Street to Sacramento Street This project will include: Paving and/or Striping Rehab/Repair (Existing Safety), *Ellsworth Street from Stuart Street to Ashby Avenue Road Maintenance & Sidewalk and/or Crosswalk Rehab/Repair (Existing), Pavement Rehab/Repair Berkeley Alameda 21/22 New FY 2022 Street Rehabilitation *Fulton Street from Dwight Way to Stuart Street Construction 06/2022 12/2022 10-20 15 9 Rehabilitation (Existing), Storm Drain and/or Culvert Rehab/Repair (Existing), ADA Curb Ramp *Heinz Avenue from Seventh Street to San Pablo Avenue Rehab/Repair (Existing), Bicycle Lane Rehab/Repair (Existing) *Stuart Street from Fulton Street to Ellsworth Street *Stuart Street from Benvenue Avenue to College Avenue Locations are estimates not yet final/complete.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stories Shaping California
    ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ !"#$%ÿ'()ÿ112ÿ3434ÿ5#ÿ6738ÿ 9 @A%5#$%ÿ'()ÿ112ÿ3434ÿ5#ÿ67B4ÿ 9 CDEDFGHIEPQÿSGQTQÿIFÿUGFÿVTEFGEWIFDÿCDPFXYÿGETÿWDP`aIFbÿG`DPXÿXcISTÿGQÿdPISeaY GQÿIFÿFTIbf`DEIFbÿgIHTEQIWTÿCDPFXYhÿGSSDEWIFbÿXDÿWGXGÿETaTGQTWÿXfIQÿcTTei pDEÿUGFÿVTEFGEWIFDÿCDPFXYhÿXfTÿWDP`aIFbÿXIqThÿDEÿXfTÿGqDPFXÿDrÿXIqTÿIXÿXGeTQ rDEÿXfTÿXDXGaÿFPq`TEÿDrÿSGQTQÿXDÿWDP`aThÿIQÿGXÿstiuÿWGYQiÿvFÿgIHTEQIWTÿCDPFXYhÿXfT WDP`aIFbÿEGXTÿIQÿwwiwÿWGYQhÿGSSDEWIFbÿXDÿXfGXÿSDPFXYxQÿFPq`TEQÿDFÿyTWFTQWGYi DbTXfTEhÿXfTÿXcDÿSDPFXITQÿqGeTÿPÿcfGXxQÿeFDcFÿGQÿXfTÿvFaGFWÿqIETi gIHTEQIWTÿfGQÿG`DPXÿiÿqIaIDFÿTDaTÿGFWÿUGFÿVTEFGEWIFDÿfGQÿG`DPXÿiÿqIaaIDFi UGFÿVTEFGEWIFDÿCDPFXYÿP`aISÿfTGaXfÿDrrISIGaQÿDFÿfPEQWGYÿETDEXTWÿs ÿFTc SDFrIEqTWÿSGQTQÿDrÿCvsÿGFWÿXcDÿFTcÿWTGXfQÿQIFSTÿyTWFTQWGYiÿfT SDPFXYÿfGQÿETDEXTWÿGÿXDXGaÿDrÿuht ÿSGQTQÿGFWÿtÿTDaTÿfGHTÿWITWÿDrÿCv sETaGXTWÿSDqaISGXIDFQÿQIFSTÿXfTÿrIEQXÿSGQTÿcGQÿETDEXTWÿIFÿXfTÿSDPFXYÿIFÿTGEaY GESfi gIHTEQIWTÿfGQÿfGWÿqDETÿSDEDFGHIEPQÿSGQTQÿQDÿrGEÿÿsh ÿGQÿDrÿfPEQWGYÿÿ`PX fGQÿXTQXTWÿu hutÿqDETÿTDaTiÿvrÿSPEETFXÿXETFWQÿfDaWhÿUGFÿVTEFGEWIFDÿCDPFXY cIaaÿfGHTÿthÿqDETÿSGQTQÿXfGFÿgIHTEQIWTÿCDPFXYÿ`YÿqIWPaYi QÿXfTÿFPq`TEÿDrÿSGQTQÿfGQÿbEDcFÿIFÿ`DXfÿSDPFXITQhÿXfTÿWDP`aIFbÿXIqTÿfGQÿbDXXTF aDFbTEÿvFÿUGFÿVTEFGEWIFDhÿrDEÿTGqaThÿXfTÿWDP`aIFbÿEGXTÿcGQÿswiÿWGYQÿDFÿGY sÿGFWÿiwÿWGYQÿDFÿEIaÿi fTÿSDPFXYÿfGQÿGÿwi ÿDHTEGaaÿrGXGaIXYÿEGXTÿXfGXÿfGQÿETqGIFTWÿPFSfGFbTWÿQIFST PTQWGYÿGFWÿIQÿdPQXÿQaIbfXaYÿaDcTEÿXfGFÿaGQXÿpEIWGYiÿfTÿqGdDEIXYÿDrÿXfDQTÿWTGXfQ fGHTÿ`TTFÿTDaTÿGbTÿÿGFWÿDaWTEi ÿ ÿÿÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ!ÿ"#ÿ$ % ÿÿ&# ' ÿ ÿ ÿ (ÿÿ)0 '(ÿ 1ÿ23ÿ'(ÿ ÿ ÿ04ÿ 5 6 ÿ7 ÿ8ÿÿ 8ÿ ' ÿÿ ÿ %ÿ41)29ÿ''% ÿÿ'
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I: Examples of Mups in Tunnels
    Memo To: Darryl Matson From: Josh Workman COWI Stantec Consulting Ltd. File: 115819043 Date: November 10, 2019 Reference: George Massey Crossing – Tunnel Treatment Considerations for Pedestrians and Cyclists – Draft INTRODUCTION The purpose of this memo is to provide an overview of precedent examples from around the world where pedestrians and cyclists are accommodated in long span tunnels in a variety of conditions and configurations. Based on the precedents reviewed, a summary of recommendations are provided for consideration to inform the design of the George Massey Crossing Project. SUMMARY OF PRECEDENTS A number of long span pedestrian and cyclist tunnels have been constructed over the last century. A range of examples from Europe, North America, and Asia are summarized in Table 1 , followed by a more detailed description of each. Table 1 - Summary of Precedent Pedestrian and Cyclist Tunnels for Comparison Length Year City Country Location (m) Completed European Precedents Rotterdam Netherlands Maastunnel 585 1942 Amsterdam Netherlands Central Station 110 2015 Tunnel Rotterdam Netherlands Benelux Tunnel 800 2002 Lyon France Croix Rousse 1763 2013 Antwerp Belgium Sint Anntunnel 572 1933 North American Precedents Thorold Canada Thorold Tunnel 840 1967 Mount Baker Seattle USA Tunnel 390 1940 Los Angeles USA 2nd Street Tunnel 460 1924 San Francisco USA Broadway Tunnel 490 1952 Asia Pacific Precedents Honshu- Kyushu Japan Kanmon Tunnel 780 Unknown Tongyeong Goseong South Korea Undersea Tunnel 480 1932 js November 10, 2019 Darryl Matson Page 2 of 14 Reference: George Massey Crossing – Tunnel Treatment Considerations for Pedestrians and Cyclists – Draft EUROPEAN PRECEDENT TUNNELS MAASTUNNEL Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands Length: 585 m Year Completed: 1942 This tunnel connects two sides of the river Nieuwe Maas between Charlois and central Rotterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit #S00167740 Filml.A., Inc
    Permit #S00167740 FilmL.A., Inc. 6255 W Sunset Blvd, 12th Floor Hollywood, CA 90028 t: (213)977-8600 - f: (213)977-8601 www.filmla.com Summary Information Permit No: S00167740 Type of Permit: STILL Release Date: 01/14/2021 Production Company WINKY BROTHERS Producer Xavier Sotomayor Insured Company Name WINKY BROTHERS Director Rory Kramer Contact Phone No. 1 310-877-5038 1st AD Evan Paterskis Contact Phone No. 2 X Fax X Production Manager Jimmy Smith Address 603 VENEZIA AVE., SUITE 8 VENICE, California 90291 FilmL.A. Coordinator Hans Groszkruger Production Title JUSTICE ALBUM COVER Location Manager Xavier Sotomayor Primary Phone Mobile - 812-219-4457 Type of Production Still Photo Secondary Phone Location Assistant Jimmy Smith Primary Phone Mobile - 904-352-6793 Secondary Phone Fees Notification Charge $173.00 Total Permit Fee $1,399.00 FILMLA NON-REFUNDABLE FILM APPLICATION $699.00 Number of Locations 2 FEE LA CITY LANE AND STREET CLOSURE FEE $312.00 LA CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT SPOT CHECK $85.00 SURCHARGE FILMLA MONITOR FEES $130.00 Permit #S00167740 FilmL.A., Inc. 6255 W Sunset Blvd, 12th Floor Hollywood, CA 90028 t: (213)977-8600 - f: (213)977-8601 www.filmla.com Summary Information Location Location 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 Permit NumberS00167740 Location ManagerXavier Sotomayor Production CompanyWINKY BROTHERS Primary PhoneMobile - 812-219-4457 Insured CompanyWINKY BROTHERS Secondary Phone Production TitleJUSTICE ALBUM COVER Location Address W 2nd St, S Figueroa St - S Hill St, Los Angeles, CA, 90071 Location Name 2ND STREET TUNNEL Location Type Street Location Description *This information is for historical reference only.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEIGHBORHOOD GUIDE to the HEART of LA the HEART of LA Try As You May—And Many Have— There’S No Pithy Way to Sum up Los Angeles
    A NEIGHBORHOOD GUIDE TO THE HEART OF LA THE HEART OF LA Try as you may—and many have— there’s no pithy way to sum up Los Angeles. Those of us who live here like it that way. It’s an eclectic place with a dynamic history of intersections (some civil, some not) between people who have created an utterly unique and multiethnic city. OUR PARTNERS Many of the neighborhoods along today’s route through the historic center of the city—the “heart of LA”—are changing. From gentrification and development to new waves of immigration and demographic shifts, there are elements being lost, buildings being renewed, and City of County of cultural movements being born. That’s the thing about a Los Angeles Los Angeles heart: if it stops circulating, you die. The same might be true of a city: if it stagnates, its vitality suffers. OUR SUPPORTERS OUR SPONSORS But the heart is more than just an organ. It is the center of Annenberg Foundation Los Angeles Department of our affection, of what we love. We heart people, places, Ralph M. Parsons Foundation Water & Power even certain taco trucks. When you know something by Rosenthal Family Foundation Roth Family Foundation Los Angeles County Department First 5 LA heart, you’ve memorized it. And hearts have layers (three of Public Health Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in humans). So does this city. The minute I think I know Goldhirsh Foundation Southern California Gas Company David Bohnett Foundation The Laemmle Charitable Foundation some tiny section of it, it opens up to reveal a layer I’d LA2050 Tern Bicycles never seen before.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionl Connector Transit Corridor Draft DEIS/DEIR
    Chapter 2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED This chapter discusses how the alternatives studied in this DEIS/DEIR were developed. All of the proposed build alternatives meet the purpose and need outlined in Chapter 1.0. Chapter 2.0 includes a detailed discussion of the alternatives identified for additional study and alternatives that were analyzed and subsequently eliminated from consideration. These alternative analyses were performed in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), and all applicable associated guidance. Depending on which alternative is selected, the Regional Connector Transit Corridor project could involve construction and operation of a 1.6 to 1.9 mile light rail transit (LRT) connector that would link the Metro Blue Line, Metro Gold Line, and future Metro Expo Line into a single consolidated system. All proposed build alternatives would begin underground at the existing Metro Blue Line (and future Metro Expo Line) platform at 7th Street/Metro Center Station and extend in a northeastern direction to a new junction with the Metro Gold Line near Alameda Street. Figure 2-1 shows all of the possible LRT routes and stations identified for study in this DEIS/DEIR. A final decision has not yet been made regarding the route of the Regional Connector Transit Corridor. Metro will consider all reasonable alternatives before making a final selection of a locally preferred alternative (LPA) that provides improved transit service in the Regional Connector Transit Corridor. In addition to the LRT alternatives, a No Build Alternative and a Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative are being studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Agency Tunnel List
    Local Agency Tunnel Inventory May 2018 Structure Maintenance & Investigations###### Minimum Mechanical/ Vertical Strategic Tunnel Tunnel Electrical Road Length Clearance AADT ON/OFF Hwy Owner Number Name Facility Carried Health Health Year Built Bores Lanes Width (Ft) (Ft) (Ft) AADT Year NHS Network City of Berkeley 33C0146 Solano-Sutter Street SOlano-Sutter St Good Good 1930 1 2 24.4 464 16.9 7,836 2011 Off Off Tunnel Data presented herein is strictly informational and should not be utilized to determine funding eligibility. Page 1 of 12 TunnelList.pdf - May 2018 Local Agency Tunnel Inventory May 2018 Structure Maintenance & Investigations###### Minimum Mechanical/ Vertical Strategic Tunnel Tunnel Electrical Road Length Clearance AADT ON/OFF Hwy Owner Number Name Facility Carried Health Health Year Built Bores Lanes Width (Ft) (Ft) (Ft) AADT Year NHS Network City of Laguna Niguel 55C0497 Salt Creek Service Road Salt Creek Service Road Fair Good 1979 1 1 14.0 177 9.4 0 2017 Off Off Tunnel Data presented herein is strictly informational and should not be utilized to determine funding eligibility. Page 2 of 12 TunnelList.pdf - May 2018 Local Agency Tunnel Inventory May 2018 Structure Maintenance & Investigations###### Minimum Mechanical/ Vertical Strategic Tunnel Tunnel Electrical Road Length Clearance AADT ON/OFF Hwy Owner Number Name Facility Carried Health Health Year Built Bores Lanes Width (Ft) (Ft) (Ft) AADT Year NHS Network City of Long Beach 53C2270 Lakewood Blvd (St.Rte. N. Lakewood Blvd (State Rte Good Poor 1958 2 6 40.0 1,005 14.9 39,055 2015 On Off 19) Tunnel 19) City of Long Beach 53C0202 Spring Street Tunnel East Spring St Fair Poor 1978 2 2 27.5 1,096 15.5 26,288 2012 Off Off Data presented herein is strictly informational and should not be utilized to determine funding eligibility.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    Community Redevelopment Agency "lihe CITY OF LOS AI\GELES ~~ CRA/~. ;oL,,' Siw,,,,',,,':;; DATE i OCT 4 - ZOOl FILE CODE 3!JL S::iyh Sprnè S~'ee~ SL,i~e 8:JD T213977 1600 F21:i9/i l(jEb I os i\ígr.CS C;"lfcyn;" 9CJ:Jl:1 12~~-i www.crala.org CRA File No. 51Sì- Council District: 9 Contact Person: Mr. Len Betz Mr. Jav Shih (213) 977-1607 (213) 977-1957 Honorable Council of the City of Los Angeles John Ferraro Council Chamber 200 N. Spring Street Room 340, City Hall Los Angeles, CA 90012 Attention: Alan Alietti, Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL: Transmitted herewith, is a Board Memorandum adopted by the Agency Board on October 4, 2007 for City Council review and approval in accordance with the "Community Redevelopment Agency Oversight Ordinance" entitled: VARIOUS ACTIONS RELATED TO: VARIOUS ACTIONS FOR THE AWARD OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT TO POWELL CONSTRUCTORS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,998,527 CONSTRUCTION OF UPPER 2ND STREET IN THE BUNKER HILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA DOWNTOWN REGION (CD 9) RECOMMENDATION That the Agency, subject to City Council review and approval, increase the delegation of authority to the Chief Executive Officer to approve change orders from $100,000 to $200,000 for this project only. The recommended action will amend the delegation of authority to the Chief Executive Officer to approve change orders to Agency authorized püblic impiovement contracts fíûm the maximüm of $100,000 to $200,000. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act was adopted by the Agency on December 16, 2004.
    [Show full text]