Milton Brewery Spill Lighting Measurements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Milton Brewery Spill Lighting Measurements 24 April 2009 20-2349 SHollis 20080424 LR Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd GPO Box 44 BRISBANE QLD 4001 Attention: Mr Steve Hollis Dear Steve Castlemaine Perkins Brewery, Milton Spill Lighting Measurements 1 Introduction Heggies Pty Ltd (Heggies) was engaged by Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd to conduct measurements of light emissions from the Milton brewery (brewery) external to the site. The Development Approval for the site does not include conditions for light emissions. Therefore, measurements of light emissions as a result of existing brewery operations have been conducted to serve as a benchmark for future reference at potentially light-sensitive developments established near the brewery. The Milton Brewery is a continuous 24/7 operation, and as such requires external lighting for functionality, worker safety and security. One (1) neon light advertising the Milton Brewery’s main product brand, “XXXX”, is located atop one of the buildings on the Milton Road frontage, and additional lighting of the building facade is provided for aesthetic purposes. The “XXXX” sign is generally regarded as an icon in Queensland and Brisbane. Photographs of the “XXXX” sign and other relevant features of the Milton Road frontage of the brewery are shown in Figure 1. HEGGIES PTY LTD ABN 29 001 584 612 Ground Floor, Suite 7, 240 Waterworks Road Ashgrove QLD 4060 Australia PO Box 844 Ashgrove QLD 4060 Australia Telephone 61 7 3858 4800 Facsimile 61 7 3858 4801 Email [email protected] Website www.heggies.com Figure 1 Signage and Milton Road Frontage of the Milton Brewery 2 Illuminance and Light Pollution Light is a type of radiation and forms part of the electromagnetic spectrum visible to the eye. It is measured in lumens (lm). The amount of light falling on a surface is known as the illuminance and is measured in lumens per square metre or lux. This is easy to calculate and measure and is therefore widely used. The illuminance of direct sunlight is approximately 100,000 lux, but normal daylight, which is filtered through a cloudy sky, is between 5,000 and 10,000 lux, while moonlight is as little as 0.01 lux. Some typical illuminance values are given in Table 3. Heggies Pty Ltd Castlemaine Perkins Brewery, Milton Spill Lighting Measurements Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd (20-2349 SHollis 20080424 LR) Page 2 Table 7 Typical Illuminance Levels for Various Scenarios Lighting Scenario Horizontal Illuminance (lux) Moonless overcast night 0.0001 Quarter Moon 0.01 Full Moon 0.1 Twilight 10 Indoor office 300 Overcast day 1000 Indirect sunlight clear day 10000-20000 Direct sunlight 100000-130000 Human vision is a complex process. The eye does not see the light arriving at an object, but rather the light radiating or reflecting from its surface. This is known as luminance, or brightness. It is directional and is measured in candelas per square metre (cd/m2). The other term commonly used by lighting engineers is luminous intensity. This refers to the strength of light in a given direction and is measured in candelas (cd). However, in reality, a source's luminous intensity is seen by the eye relative to the brightness of its surroundings, and this is not easy to measure. Glare is the uncomfortable brightness of a light source when viewed against a darker background. A light source's luminous intensity in candelas (cd) gives an indication of levels of glare. However, because this is difficult to measure, the threshold increment, that is the percentage increase in luminance is sometimes used as a surrogate measure. Light trespass is the spill of light beyond the boundary of the property on which a light is located. Again, it can be estimated from the luminous intensity in candelas (cd) of the light source, but a more accurate guide is illuminance in the vertical plane in lux, measured at the boundaries or windows of properties. Light pollution is a very general term which refers to the effect of over-lighting resulting from poorly designed lighting schemes and excessive levels of light. It is commonly subdivided into sky glow, glare and light trespass, each of which has a different meaning technically, and is measured in different ways. Sky glow is the glow (often a coloured glow, depending on the light source) caused by a scattering of artificial light by dust particles and water droplets in the sky. It is closely related to the upward light waste ratio (ULWR) of lighting installations in the vicinity. 3 Recommended Limits for Light Parameters Australian Standard 4282-1997 Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting (AS 4282) provides recommended limits for light parameters to avoid adverse impacts for the majority of the population. Relevant parameters and respective recommended limits are provided in Table 1. It should be noted that while Milton Road and the Milton train station are well-lit, the area does not meet the requirements for “light surrounds”. Therefore the values for “dark surrounds” are applicable to the residential land uses to the north and west of the brewery. Heggies Pty Ltd Castlemaine Perkins Brewery, Milton Spill Lighting Measurements Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd (20-2349 SHollis 20080424 LR) Page 3 Table 1 Recommended Maximum Values of Light Technical Parameters for the Control of Obtrusive Light from AS 4282. Light Technical Application or Calculation In commercial areas Residential areas Parameter Conditions or at Boundary of Light Dark Commercial and Surrounds2 Surrounds3 Residential Areas1 Pre curfew: Limits apply at relevant boundaries of nearby residential properties, in a vertical plane parallel to the relevant boundary, 25 lx 10 lx 10 lx to a height commensurate with the height of the potentially affected dwellings. Values given are for the direct component of illuminance. Curfewed hours: Limits apply in the plane of the Illuminance in windows of habitable rooms of Vertical Plane (Ev) dwellings on nearby residential properties. In the absence of development (i.e. vacant allotment), the limits apply on the potentially affected property, in a 4 lx 2 lx 1 lx vertical plane parallel to the relevant boundary, at the minimum setback permitted for a dwelling, to a height commensurate with the land use zoning provisions. Values given are for the direct component of illuminance. Notes: 1 Applies to residential accommodation in commercial areas or at the boundary between commercial and residential areas. The term ‘commercial’ is used as a generic description for zoning which provides for urban uses other than residential. 2 Where the affected property abuts roads that are lit to Category V5 or higher in accordance with AS/NZS 1158.1.1. 3 Where the affected property abuts roads that are lit to Category B1 or lower in accordance with AS 1158.1, or where there is no lighting. 4 Attended Illuminance Measurements Attended illuminance measurements were made at 17 locations described in Table 2 and indicated in Figure 2. The measurements were conducted during the evening of Sunday 22 February 2009. This date was chosen due to minimal light from the moon, and minimal general work disturbance. It should be noted that measurements of light from the brewery have been conducted previously from one of the residential flats at the adjacent property (Theological College) on approximately the 14th March 2007. The light measured was < 0.01 lux, due to the considerable shading afforded by the trees on the property. Heggies Pty Ltd Castlemaine Perkins Brewery, Milton Spill Lighting Measurements Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd (20-2349 SHollis 20080424 LR) Page 4 Table 2 Light Measurement Locations Location Number Location Description 1 Opposite brewery driveway 2 237 Gregory House driveway 3 Opposite brewery grain truck exit 4 Opposite "Castlemaine Perkins Brewery" sign on brewery 5 Opposite brewery gate 6 Opposite brewery gate 7 Opposite plant room gate (western edge) where bus stop railing opens 8 Paten Street, opposite engine room 9 Northern edge of Officeworks car park 10 Opposite brewery car park gate 11 On corner of Paten and Black Streets 12 On corner of Black and Finchley Streets 13 Opposite packaging building (near parking meter) 14 Opposite car park driveway 15 Opposite brewery driveway 16 Adjacent property, near hydrant 17 Adjacent property, near grain truck entry gate Figure 2 Light Measurement Locations Heggies Pty Ltd Castlemaine Perkins Brewery, Milton Spill Lighting Measurements Castlemaine Perkins Pty Ltd (20-2349 SHollis 20080424 LR) Page 5 Two orthogonal components of illuminance lux were measured at each of the measurement locations including one horizontal bearing toward the Milton Brewery site and one vertically upward. In addition to this, a measurement of light from the “XXXX” sign was conducted at a distance of 17 m. Measurements were taken using a Topcon IM-5 Digital Illuminance meter over the instrument lower limit range of 0.01 to 20 lux. The meter measures illuminance over a full incident hemisphere with angular error ranging between +/- 1% at normal incident angles, +/- 5% at 50º incident angle up to +/-10% at 80º incident angle. Also recorded were cloud cover, moon position and size and any surrounding artificial light sources noted. Additional notes pertaining to the measurements were also recorded. Two (2) sets of measurements were conducted at each location. One set of measurements was conducted with as many as possible external lights at the brewery switched on, and the other with the lights switched off. A small number of lights could not be operated. 4.1 Illuminance Measurement Results The results of the measurements are provided in Table 3. Table 3 Measured Illuminance at Locations around the Milton Brewery Illuminance Measured in Plane (Lux) Lights On Lights Off Location Number Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Vertical 1 93.6 25.5 3.7 1.37 2 21.1 11.3 2.2 0.78 3 8.9 8.2 0.4 0.63 4 21.6 12.9 1.37 1.34 5 15 8.1 1.3 0.6 6 14.5 13.3 0.82 0.82 7 18.6 8.6 1.59 0.803 8 3.9 5.6 0.359 0.517 9 15 4.1 0.49 0.361 10 26 1.3 27.9 0.68 11 4.6 5.3 5.47 4.7 12 11.6 9.9 12.95 8.73 13 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.07 14 0.18 1.06 0.26 0.04 15 1.06 1.69 1.27 1.76 16 47.8 30.7 1.61 0.053 17 41 30.5 0.08 0.18 The differences in the measured illuminance levels in each plane at each location are shown in Table 4.
Recommended publications
  • Brisbane City Council (Council)
    volume 1 environmental impact statement supplementary report June 2009 Northern Link Environmental Impact Statement Supplementary Report June 2009 PAGE i PAGE 1-3 Northern Link Supplementary Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1-7 1.1 Purpose of the Supplementary Report 1-7 1.2 Consultation on the EIS 1-7 1.3 Coordinator General’s Evaluation Report 1-8 2. Overview and Development of the Project 2-9 2.1 Background to the notification of the EIS submission period 2-9 2.2 Further development of the Project 2-9 2.3 Overview of Submissions Received 2-10 2.3.1 Submissions from Government Agencies 2-10 2.3.2 Public Submissions 2-12 2.3.3 Response to submissions 2-14 2.4 Draft Outline Environmental Management Plan 2-14 2.5 Urban Mitigations 2-14 3. Description of the Project 3-16 3.1 General Description of Northern Link 3-16 3.2 Project Design 3-16 3.2.1 Surface Road Connections 3-17 3.2.2 Ventilation Stations and Outlets 3-18 3.3 Project Delivery Mode 3-18 3.3.1 Program and Responsibilities 3-18 3.3.2 Establishment and Preliminary Works 3-20 3.3.3 Tunnel Construction 3-20 3.4 Project Operations Mode 3-22 4. Assessment of the Northern Link Project 4-25 4.1 Traffic and Transport 4-28 4.1.1 Forecast Demand for Northern Link 4-29 4.1.2 Function of Northern Link 4-33 4.1.3 Function of the Project connections 4-36 4.1.4 Traffic Volume Effects on Regional and Connecting Roads and Intersections 4-37 4.1.5 Effects on Local Roads 4-54 4.1.6 Metropolitan Area Network Performance 4-62 4.1.7 Travel Time Benefits 4-65 4.1.8 Local Access Effects 4-72
    [Show full text]
  • RACQ Unroadworthy Roads Technical Appendix
    RACQ Unroadworthy Roads Technical Appendix Author Public Policy Date March 2016 Title: RACQ Unroadworthy Roads Technical Appendix Issued Date: March 2016 Page: 1 of 104 List of roads with number of responses to identified problems cont’d IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS Tight Vegetation Poor or Slippery / curves / Narrow Narrow Poor Hazardous Poor or or objects Lack of inadequate Rough Loose blind road / bridge / road Poor Poor roadside no guard block overtaking Flood Poor road Steep Road Name # Responses Surface surface crests lanes culvert markings signing shoulders objects rails visibility opportunities prone drainage lighting grade Bruce Highway 67 38 9 10 27 17 14 8 27 8 11 8 30 22 15 11 1 Pacific Motorway 32 8 1 1 6 1 3 - 4 - - 1 4 - 2 - - Mount Lindesay Highway 21 5 - - 5 - 1 2 4 1 1 - 14 4 2 3 1 Captain Cook Highway 19 5 2 2 2 1 2 - 2 2 1 1 1 4 5 - - Rickertt Road 19 18 3 - 8 3 6 1 13 3 2 - 6 16 9 10 - D'Aguilar Highway 16 12 5 4 6 1 4 1 6 2 1 3 12 2 5 1 1 Kennedy Highway 15 2 5 7 6 1 - - 6 1 5 2 13 1 - 1 1 Warrego Highway 14 11 3 3 5 2 3 2 6 2 - 2 3 3 3 2 - New England Highway 11 9 2 2 4 2 1 1 4 2 2 1 5 2 1 - - Telegraph Road 11 4 - - - - - - 2 - - - - 1 1 - - Kingsford Smith Drive 10 8 2 - 4 - 3 - 2 - - - - - 1 - - Maleny-Kenilworth Road 10 10 2 4 10 4 2 1 8 4 - 1 5 - 2 - - Gore Highway 9 8 1 - 5 - - - 5 1 2 - 2 2 - - - Samford Road 9 7 2 3 6 - 1 1 1 2 - - 2 - 2 - - Tinaburra Drive 9 7 3 5 9 2 4 2 6 2 - 1 3 - - 4 - Burnett Highway 8 8 - 3 4 4 2 2 7 2 1 2 5 3 4 1 - Beachmere Road 7 6 1 2 7 6 1 2 7 - 1 2 2 6 3 3 - Beechmont Road 7 1 2 7 7
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Link Road Tunnel
    Coordinator-General’s report Northern Link Road Tunnel Released: April 2010 Report evaluating the Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to section 35(3) of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971 Coordinator-General’s report – Northern Link Road Tunnel project Contents Synopsis.........................................................................................................4 1. Introduction.............................................................................................6 2. Project description .................................................................................7 2.1 The proponent ...................................................................................7 2.2 Project description .............................................................................7 2.3 Rationale for the project.....................................................................8 3. The impact assessment process............................................................11 3.1 Significant project declaration and controlled action........................11 3.2 Terms of reference for the EIS ........................................................11 3.3 Public notification of the EIS ............................................................12 3.4 Submissions on the EIS...................................................................12 3.5 Change to the project after the EIS..................................................13 3.6 Review of the further information provided (supplementary report to
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Metropolitan Districdepartmentt of Transport and Main Roads
    Department of Transport and Main Roads Metropolitan metropolitan districDepartmentt of Transport and Main Roads BRISBANE BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL CLEVELAND CAPALABA Bellbowrie Legend Redland Bay IPSWICH National road network Rosewood State strategic road network State regional and other district road IPSWICH REDLAND CITY CITY National rail network COUNCIL COUNCIL Other railway Local government boundary Legend National road network State strategic road network ³ State regional and other district road 0 25 National rail network Km Other railway Local government boundary Metropolitan District contacts Region Office Street address Postal address Telephone Email Metropolitan Brisbane 313 Adelaide\\imapsf iStreet,le\jobs Brisbane\jobs\CO RQldPO 4000RATE PRODUCTS\Annual RepoPOrt a Boxnd R 70,IP SpringMaps\ RHillIP QldMap 4004s\2014\Metropolitan\Metropolitan District 13Q TQGOVRIP_ 2(1301 744.m 68)xd [email protected] Divider image: Aerial photograph of the Brisbane City and Brisbane River. Photographer: Full Frame Photographics. Copyright © Translink Division, Department of Transport and Main Roads, The Queensland Government. Department of Transport and Main Roads District profile Overview • construction of Stage 2 of the Darra to Springfield • complete construction of the Warrego Highway and Transit Corridor, including a rail duplication from Brisbane Valley Highway Intersection Upgrade at The Metropolitan district covers an area of about 2,968km2, Richlands to Springfield, new rail stations at Springfield Blacksoil, jointly funded by the Australian Government or around 0.2% of Queensland. It straddles the Brisbane and Springfield Lakes, and safety and capacity and Queensland Government. River and extends from Mount Glorious in the north down to upgrades to the Centenary Highway south of the Logan the Logan River, and from Point Lookout in the east to west Motorway.
    [Show full text]
  • RGSQ Bulletin September 2017
    September 2017 RGSQ Bulletin ISSN 1832-8830 Vol 52 no 8 Published by The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc., a not-for-profit organisation established in 1885 that promotes the study of geography and encourages a greater understanding and enjoyment of the world around us. Patron: H.E. Paul de Jersey AC, Governor of Queensland President: Professor James Shulmeister From the President Annual General Meeting - September 19, 2017 ear members, on the weekend of the 13th-14th August, I attended the 90th anniversary of the Geographical Society of Notice of Meeting New South Wales (GSNSW). A big thank you to Phil DMcManus (the GSNSW President) for the invitation. The event was Notice is hereby given to members of the Society that the 2017 Annual held in MacLaurin Hall at the University of Sydney. It was a great General Meeting of The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc evening and I congratulate them on their achievement. What struck will be held: me was how different our respective societies are. The GSNSW at “Gregory House”, 237 Milton Road, Milton, Brisbane seems to be solidly based in academia with most members either on Tuesday, the 19th of September 2017, commencing at 7:40 pm. academics or students. As such, a direct comparison to RGSQ is of The business to be transacted at the meeting is: limited value as the RGSQ is not, and should not become, a primarily (i) to receive the Council’s Report and the Statement of Income and academic organisation. What it does have some value for, though, is Expenditure, Assets and Liabilities of the Society for the year 1st in how to attract and retain student members, as that is clearly a July 2016 – 30th June 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Access Bus Schedule a Part 2-Brisbane City Council Routes
    NATIONAL CLASS 2 HEAVY VEHICLE CONTROLLED ACCESS BUS AUTHORISATION (NOTICE) 2014 (No.1) AND NATIONAL CLASS 3 HEAVY VEHICLE CONTROLLED ACCESS BUS REAR OVERHANG DIMENSION EXEMPTION (NOTICE) 2014 (No.1) Schedule “A” Part 2 - Brisbane City Council Controlled Access Buses (Not exceeding 14.
    [Show full text]
  • KEY CORRIDORS PERFORMANCE REPORT Contents GREATER BRISBANE ROAD NETWORK 1 Report Findings 1 Highlights 1
    JULY-DECEMBER 2015 GREATER BRISBANE KEY CORRIDORS PERFORMANCE REPORT Contents GREATER BRISBANE ROAD NETWORK 1 Report findings 1 Highlights 1 GREATER BRISBANE KEY CORRIDORS 2 CORRIDOR TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY 4 NETWORK VEHICLE KILOMETRES TRAVELLED SUMMARY 6 Traffic volume and vehicle kilometres travelled 6 CORRIDOR AVERAGE SPEED 7 AVERAGE NETWORK SPEED SUMMARY 9 Average speed 9 KINGSFORD SMITH DRIVE: CASE STUDY 10 Traffic volume trend 10 Average speed trend 11 STATE GOVERNMENT CONGESTION INITIATIVES 12 Gateway Upgrade North 12 Bruce Highway Managed Motorways Project (BHMMP) 13 Gateway Upgrade South project 14 List of congestion management projects from Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program 14 COUNCIL CONGESTION INITIATIVES 15 Kingsford Smith Drive (KSD) upgrade 15 Inner City Bypass upgrade 16 Wynnum Road corridor upgrade – stage 1 16 Roads and intersection upgrades 16 Road resurfacing program 17 Congestion reduction projects for July to December 2015 17 FACTORS AFFECTING NETWORK PERFORMANCE 17 Significant incident data 17 GREATER BRISBANE ROAD NETWORK This report provides information on the traffic volume and average speed for the Greater Brisbane key transport corridors over the July to December 2015 period. These Highlights corridors include Brisbane City Council (Council) and Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) managed roads. Network summaries are presented in vehicle Network vehicle kilometres travelled kilometres travelled (VKT) and average network speeds. The report includes information on initiatives being increased by 0.2% from the same undertaken by both organisations to manage congestion on the road network. period last year. Report findings AM peak average 41.3 There are 37 key corridors, covering 327.3 kilometres, in the network speed is Greater Brisbane area.
    [Show full text]
  • Brisbane West – Core Frequent Network
    Brisbane West – Core Frequent Network Direct, Legible, Frequent The Current Bus Network The western suburbs of Brisbane are a typical suburban area, with a variety of both major and minor trip generators. The key regional activity centres in this area include: Mt Ommaney Centre Indooroopilly Shopping Centre Toowong Shopping Centre Inala Plaza University of Queensland All bar Mt Ommaney Centre are currently serviced by the frequent network (BUZ routes, and in the case of Toowong and to a lesser extent Indooroopilly, frequent rail), with Mt Ommaney having reasonable frequencies the majority of the time to the CBD thanks to the combination of the 450, 453, 454 and 460. Unfortunately, beyond these centres, huge swathes of the western suburbs are victims of poor frequency, illegible bus routes and unnecessary duplication. The Kenmore area is a very good example of an area which suffers from an illegible network of bus routes. At the Kenmore Road at Kenmore South, stop 44 stop, there are five bus routes which depart from this location in peak – the 430, 431, 432, 433 and 446. While in peak these routes can be combined to provide decent frequency, in the PM peak, these routes depart from multiple locations, splitting frequency and duplicating routes. The peak-hour express routes listed (431, 446) also run no more than a few times every day and on an infrequent basis, contributing to an illegible network. Duplication is also a hallmark of the network. The most duplicated corridor in this region is the Coronation Drive corridor to Toowong, which in the off-peak has 24 buses per hour running down it.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Response to Submissions
    environmental impact statement supplementary report Appendix B: Response to Submissions Northern Link Environmental Impact Statement Supplementary Report APPENDIX B RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS June 2009 Contents B. Response to Submissions B-1 B.1 Introduction B-4 B.2 Project Rationale B-16 B.3 Project Development B-38 B.4 Project Description B-53 B.5 Traffic and Transport B-84 B.6 Geology and Soils B-182 B.7 Hydrology B-185 B.8 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases B-187 B.9 Noise and Vibration B-217 B.10 Ecology B-236 B.11 Planning and Land Use B-238 B.12 Cultural Heritage B-248 B.13 Social Environment B-253 B.14 Urban Design and Visual Environment B-271 B.15 Economic Environment B-281 B.16 Hazard and Risk B-295 B.17 Waste Management B-297 B.18 Health and Safety B-298 B.19 Environmental Management Plan B-302 B.20 Urban Regeneration B-307 B.21 Cumulative Impacts B-317 B.22 Conclusions and Recommendations B-325 PAGE ii B.Response to Submissions This chapter of the Supplementary Report addresses to issues raised in the submissions to the EIS. The chapter is set out in parallel to the chapter headings and second level headings from the EIS Volume 1, Parts A, B and C. Issues and associated responses are numbered under headings used in the EIS. Unless otherwise referred to, statements in the issues are statements from the submissions as summarised in Appendix A. Corrections and Clarifications of the EIS The following corrections and clarifications of the EIS have been requested or raised in the submissions.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 April 2020 Mr Michael Berkman MP Member for Maiwar Maiwar
    Our ref: MC112151 15 April 2020 Mr Michael Berkman MP Member for Maiwar [email protected] Dear Mr Berkman Thank you for your letters about various issues on MetRoad 5 and the meeting held with representatives from the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) on 14 November 2019. I apologise for the delay in responding. TMR has advised the following in relation to the issues raised in your letters. Boundary Road/Rouen Road, Bardon Red pavement marking TMR has further assessed its advice about installation of a red pavement zebra crossing and has determined that this treatment would have minimal benefit. However, in order to improve motorists’ awareness of the pedestrian crossing, TMR has undertaken the following treatments: • hi-visibility target boards installed on the pedestrian crossing signs • advance pedestrian crossing warning signs installed • reflective hand rails or yellow bars installed in the pedestrian staging area • new asphalt with zebra crossing line marked with long-life thermoplastic white lines • installation of advance pavement messages advising of the crossing • vegetation clearing maintenance undertaken on the roundabout. TMR will continue to monitor this location to determine the effectiveness of these treatments and to further modify as appropriate. Speed limit review TMR has undertaken a speed data survey in the area of Latrobe Terrace and MetRoad 5, with a further speed limit review covering the Rouen and Boundary Roads roundabout leg expected to be completed by the end of this financial year. The review will consider crash history, traffic volumes and prevailing speeds, road function and characteristics. Once the review is complete, it will be tabled at a meeting of the local speed management committee for discussion and endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Link Road Tunnel
    Northern Link INITIAL ADVICE STATEMENT September 2007 Northern Link Detailed Feasibility Study INITIAL ADVICE STATEMENT September 2007 Major Infrastructure Projects Office Brisbane City Council Level 2, 171 George Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Phone: 07 3403 7330 Fax: 07 3403 7333 Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Need for the Project 7 1.3 Proponent 9 1.4 Purpose of Initial Advice Statement 9 2. Project Information 12 2.1 Location 12 2.2 Studies to Date 12 2.3 Project Objectives 13 2.4 Project Details 14 2.4.1 Project Corridor 14 2.4.2 Network Connections 14 2.4.3 Ventilation 14 2.4.4 Other Works 15 2.5 Sustainability 15 3. Level of Investment 17 3.1 Project Cost and Timing 17 3.2 Financial Issues 17 4. Planning and Policy Framework 18 4.1 Transport Strategy 18 4.2 Strategic Planning Framework 19 4.3 Strategic Significance of the Project 20 5. Complexity of Government Requirements 22 5.1 Planning Approvals Framework 22 5.1.1 Introduction 22 5.1.2 State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 22 5.1.3 The Integrated Planning Act 22 5.1.4 Development and Other Approvals 24 5.1.5 Commonwealth Requirements 24 5.2 Agency consultation 25 6. Effects on Relevant Infrastructure 27 6.1 Transport Infrastructure 27 6.1.1 Road Network 27 6.1.2 Rail Network 27 6.2 Public Utility Services 27 6.2.1 Water Supply and Drainage 27 6.2.2 Energy Usage 28 6.2.3 Telecommunications 28 PAGE i 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Proceedings
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND PARLIAMENT Page Tuesday, 10 February 2009 MOTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders ........................................................................................................................ 1 ASSENT TO BILLS .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 4 December 2008, from Her Excellency the Governor to the Speaker advising of assent to a bill on 4 December 2008. ........................................................................................................................... 1 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 11 December 2008, from Her Excellency the Governor to the Speaker advising of assent to bills on 11 December 2008. .......................................................................................................................... 2 MOTION OF CONDOLENCE ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Murray, Mr
    [Show full text]