Biocentury the BERNSTEIN REPORT on BIOBUSINESS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
By in Vivo's Biopharma, Medtech and Diagnostics Teams
invivo.pharmaintelligence.informa.com JANUARY 2018 Invol. 36 ❚ no. 01 Vivopharma intelligence ❚ informa 2018 OUTLOOK By In Vivo’s Biopharma, Medtech and Diagnostics Teams PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY invivo.pharmaintelligence.informa.com STRATEGIC INSIGHTS FOR LIFE SCIENCES DECISION-MAKERS CONTENTS ❚ In Vivo Pharma intelligence | January 2018 BIOPHARMA MEDTECH 2018 DIAGNOSTICS OUTLOOK 12 22 28 Biopharma 2018: Medtech 2018: Diagnostics 2018: Is There Still A Place For Pharma The Place For Innovation Steady Progress And In The New Health Care As Value-based Health Care The Big Get Bigger Economy? Gains Momentum MARK RATNER WILLIAM LOONEY ASHLEY YEO If the beginning of 2017 was marked 2018 will be a time of transition in health 2017 was a watershed year in many by doubts around whether and how care, when biopharma’s counterparts respects, politically, economically the FDA would act with respect to in adjacent industry segments scale up and commercially for many players complex diagnostics, we enter 2018 in a radical redesign of their traditional in the medtech field. Where will the feeling that slow-moving vessel may business models. Biopharma is not opportunities lie in 2018? Will finally be turning. moving as quickly, and it confronts a breakthrough medtech innovation still strategic dilemma on how to address the have a place among providers often prospect of a much more powerful set of riding on fumes when it comes to 36 rivals in the ongoing battle to own the budgets, and is it all as bad as some patient experience in medicine. would make out? Thirty-five Years Covering Health Care: The More Things Change… 30 PETER CHARLISH A Virtuous Cycle: What The The health care industry has come a Immuno-Oncology Revolution long way in the past 35 years, although Means For Other Disease Areas in some areas very little has changed. -
PULSE: Speaker Biographies March 2019
PULSE: Speaker Biographies March 2019 Supported by @BIA_UK www.bioindustry.org In order of appearance: Dr Barbara Domayne-Hayman Entrepreneur-in-residence, Francis Crick Institute, CBO, Autifony Therapeutics Ltd and formerly Chairman, Puridify Barbara has worked on the commercial side of life sciences for thirty years, first in a large organisation (ICI/Zeneca/AstraZeneca), before transitioning to the entrepreneurial world of biotech. Barbara joined the Francis Crick Institute in January 2018 as Entrepreneur-in- residence. She is also Chief Business officer of Autifony, where she is responsible for strategic partnering, fundraising and commercial aspects of drug development for CNS disorders. In December 2017 Autifony signed a major collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim. Barbara was also Chair of Puridify, a UCL spin-out with a breakthrough biotherapeutics purification technology, which was acquired by GE in November 2017. She chairs the LifeArc Seed Fund investment committee, and is on the Cambridge Enterprise Seed Fund Investment Committee. Previously, Barbara was CEO of Stabilitech, and she was Commercial Director at Arrow Therapeutics until the company was acquired by AstraZeneca. Barbara was also Senior Business Development Manager at Celltech. Barbara has a BA and D Phil in Chemistry from the University of Oxford, and is a Sloan Fellow from London Business School. Steve Bates, OBE CEO, BioIndustry Association Since his appointment as Chief Executive of the BioIndustry Association in 2012, Steve has led major BIA campaigns for, amongst other things, improved access to finance, the refilling of the Biomedical Catalyst, anti-microbial resistance and the opportunity the sector presents to generalist long term investors. Steve champions the adaptive pathway approach to the licensing of new drugs, the need for Early Access and is particularly proud of the working relationship the BIA has established with the UK’s leading medical research charities. -
February 11-12, 2013 the Waldorf Astoria New York
February 11-12, 2013 The Waldorf Astoria New York 15th ANNU AL EVENT Now in its fifteenth year, the BIO CEO & Investor Conference is the largest independent investor conference focused on leading publicly-traded biotech companies. The meeting provides a neutral forum where institutional investors, industry analysts, and senior biotechnology executives have the opportunity to shape the future investment landscape of the biotechnology industry. Reasons Top 10 to attend 1 Present your company story to an audience of targeted investors. 2 Hear the Washington perspective on the Affordable Care Act, debt ceiling, and other timely policy developments affecting the industry. 3 Evaluate fresh investment opportunities including compatible, complementary and competitive companies. 4 Learn about the hottest clinical developments and industry catalysts by attending the conference’s therapeutic workshops and business roundtables. 5 Attend fireside chats with CEOs who will share their recent company successes, what keeps the C-suite up at night, and where the industry’s leading companies are headed in 2013. 6 Gain access to BIO’s 1x1 Partnering System for scouting potential deal partners and optimizing your time at the event. 7 Access presentations from more than 140 established public and private biotech companies and non-profit funding organizations, including many you won’t hear from at other investor conferences. 8 Get the pulse on the current and proposed investment trends in biotechnology. 9 Network with peers, investors and potential partners attending the conference. 10 It’s the first NYC biotech conference of the year, kicking off a week of key industry events that you don’t want to miss. -
CDER – Redi: Focus on CGMP & FDA Inspections – Participant List
FDA – CDER – RedI: Focus on CGMP & FDA Inspections – Participant List These participants granted permission to share their contact information Eileen Zhou Michael Channing A B M Mahfuz ul Alam Research Associate Group Chief - Positron Emission General Manager, Quality Operations Neuralstem Tomography Department ACI HealthCare Limited Germantown, MD, United States NIH Dhaka, Non-US, Bangladesh [email protected] Bethesda, MD, United States [email protected] [email protected] Abe Wong ABHIJEET GUJAR Adam Ebbinghouse CCO Chief Operating Officer QC Associate Gmpsigma SETHU KP Pharmaceutical Technology, Inc. Seattle, WA, United States Porvorim Goa, Non-US, India Bloomington, IN, United States [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Adil Gatrad Adiseshu Modugula Aditiben Patel Director, Quality Systems RA Regulatory Specialist Actavis MSN USAMMDA Parsippany, NJ, United States Hyderabad, Non-US, India Frederick, MD, United States [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Adriana de la Cruz ahsanul haque Aimee Gogarty Manager CSO Quality Coordinator Laboratorios Pisa SA de CV FDA Mallinckrodt Jalisco, Non-US, Mexico silver spring, MD, United States Port Allen, LA, United States [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Aislyn Fronzak Ajay Deshmukh Ajay Khedkar QC Manager QA manager Regulatory Affair PL Developments Ingenus Pharmaceutical Umedica Laboratories Pvt Ltd Clinton, SC, United States Navi mumbai, Non-US, India Mumbai, Non-US, India [email protected] -
Regulation of Specific Target Genes and Biological Responses by Estrogen Receptor Subtype Agonists Leitman Et Al
COPHAR-861; NO. OF PAGES 8 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Regulation of specific target genes and biological responses by estrogen receptor subtype agonists Dale C Leitman1, Sreenivasan Paruthiyil2, Omar I Vivar1, Elise F Saunier2, Candice B Herber1, Isaac Cohen2, Mary Tagliaferri2 and Terence P Speed3,4 Estrogenic effects are mediated through two estrogen receptor adverse effects. The most troublesome side-effect of (ER) subtypes, ERa and ERb. Estrogens are the most estrogens is the increased risk of breast and endometrial commonly prescribed drugs to treat menopausal conditions, cancer [1,2]. Estrogens also increase blood clotting that but by non-selectively triggering both ERa and ERb pathways can lead to venous thromboembolisms, and possibly in different tissues they can cause serious adverse effects. The strokes and heart disease, particularly in older women different sizes of the binding pockets and sequences of their [1]. activation function domains indicate that ERa and ERb should have different specificities for ligands and biological responses Estrogens in hormone therapy (HT) were formulated that can be exploited for designing safer and more selective long before there was a significant understanding of estrogens. ERa and ERb regulate different genes by binding to the mechanism of action of estrogens. The identification different regulatory elements and recruiting different of ERa and ERb (Figure 1) and the crystal structures of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors that are their ligand binding domain (LBD), the discovery of a expressed in a cell-specific manner. ERa-selective and ERb- variety of coregulatory proteins involved in the genomic selective agonists have been identified that demonstrate that pathway and the demonstration of the nongenomic the two ERs produce distinct biological effects. -
Guidelines with Regard to the Composition, Calculation and Management of the Index
INDEX METHODOLOGY Solactive Pharma Breakthrough Value Index Version 2.1 dated September 03, 2020 Contents Important Information 1. Index specifications 1.1 Short Name and ISIN 1.2 Initial Value 1.3 Distribution 1.4 Prices and Calculation Frequency 1.5 Weighting 1.6 Index Committee 1.7 Publication 1.8 Historical Data 1.9 Licensing 2. Composition of the Index 2.1 Selection of the Index Components 2.2 Ordinary Adjustment 2.3 Extraordinary Adjustment 3. Calculation of the Index 3.1 Index Formula 3.2 Accuracy 3.3 Adjustments 3.4 Dividends and other Distributions 3.5 Corporate Actions 3.6 Correction Policy 3.7 Market Disruption 3.8 Consequences of an Extraordinary Event 4. Definitions 5. Appendix 5.1 Contact Details 5.2 Calculation of the Index – Change in Calculation Method 2 Important Information This document (“Index Methodology Document”) contains the underlying principles and regulations regarding the structure and the operating of the Solactive Pharma Breakthrough Value Index. Solactive AG shall make every effort to implement regulations. Solactive AG does not offer any explicit or tacit guarantee or assurance, neither pertaining to the results from the use of the Index nor the Index value at any certain point in time nor in any other respect. The Index is merely calculated and published by Solactive AG and it strives to the best of its ability to ensure the correctness of the calculation. There is no obligation for Solactive AG – irrespective of possible obligations to issuers – to advise third parties, including investors and/or financial intermediaries, of any errors in the Index. -
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Statistical Methods for Dose-Response Assays Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9295t422 Author Tong, Frances Poyen Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Statistical Methods for Dose-Response Assays by Frances Poyen Tong A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Terence P. Speed, Chair Professor Haiyan Huang Professor John Ngai Professor Deborah Nolan Spring 2010 Statistical Methods for Dose-Response Assays Copyright 2010 by Frances Poyen Tong 1 Abstract Statistical Methods for Dose-Response Assays by Frances Poyen Tong Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Terence P. Speed, Chair Dose-response assays are a common and increasingly high throughput method of as- sessing the toxicity of potential drug targets on test populations of cells. Such assays typically involve serial dilutions of the compounds in question applied to cell samples to determine the level of cell activity across a broad range of concentrations. Another factor in such experiments may be the change in activity under different enzyme com- binations and the use of controls to adjust for interassay variations. Typically, the decreasing number in the population of cells due to increasing concentrations of the drug can be modeled with a logistic curve. Since the appropriate range of concen- trations of the drug to test in order to see these reactions cannot be predetermined fully, frequently the data available for a given experimental unit may not be enough to fit such curves on their own successfully. -
The Weekly Shot Biotech Issue a Weekly Summary of Healthcare Industry Valuation and Near-Term Catalysts June 17, 2010
Small Cap The Weekly Shot Biotech Issue June 17, 2010 A weekly summary of healthcare industry valuation and near-term catalysts The Weekly Shot: Overview and Comment - Small Cap Biotechnology Next week's sector highlights include LGND’s Thursday analyst event at the Eventi - Pharmaceuticals and Large Cap Biotech Hotel in NYC. The company on 6/15 announced updated 2010 revenue guidance of approx $25M, op ex of approx $30M, and expects to finish the year with $30M - Generics and Specialty Pharmaceuticals in cash (vs approx $43M as of 1Q10). Management will likely focus on partner GSK’s progress with add’l trials of Promacta (for ITP), which could potentially expand the drug’s label to Hep C, AML, and MDS (LGND receives <10% royalty from GSK). Investors should focus on pipeline plans following LGND’s opportunistic 2008/09 M&A activity. Key pipeline programs include LGD-4033 (ph.I, SARM candidate from PCOP) and RG7348, partnered with Roche (ph.I, Hep C candidate from MBRX). We do not expect major data announcements at the event. FDA’s Pediatric Drugs Advisory Committee will meet Monday to discuss pediatric safety reviews of multiple approved drugs, including Kogenate, Casodex, Apidra, NovoLog, Arimidex, Desmopressin, Prevacid, Nexium, Aciphex, Priolex, OraVerse, Zemuron, and Suprane . While important from a public safety perspective, we do not anticipate regulatory activity to be announced. Brian Lian, Ph.D. Small caps biotechs rebounded mid-week as elevated volatility continued across 212.500.6646 [email protected] the broader market. Investors are struggling to balance economic data supporting a modest recovery against concerns on EU debt loads, financial reform legislation, and aggressive govt rhetoric on BP’s oil spill. -
CURRICULUM VITAE MARK DAVID SANCHEZ, MD, FACOG 2454 Mcmullen Booth Rd., Suite 601 Phone: (727) 7967705
CURRICULUM VITAE MARK DAVID SANCHEZ, MD, FACOG 2454 McMullen Booth Rd., Suite 601 Phone: (727) 7967705 CURRENT POSITIONS Reproductive Endocrinologist IVF Medical Director Florida Fertility Institute Clearwater, Florida Associate Medical Director and Investigator Women's Medical Research Group, LLC Clearwater, Florida Associate Medical Director and Investigator Florida Clinical Research Group Clearwater, Florida Department Chair Obstetrics and Gynecology Bayfront Medical Center St. Petersburg, Florida BIRTH DATE and PLACE March 25, 1969, Indianapolis, IN EDUCATION and TRAINING 19992002 Fellowship in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of South Florida Tampa, Florida 19951999 Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Bayfront Medical Center St. Petersburg, Florida 19911995 Doctor of Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville, Florida 19891991 Bachelor of Science Major: Biology Minor: History University of South Florida Tampa, Florida WORK EXPERIENCE 20022014 Reproductive Endocrinologist IVF Medical Director Florida Fertility Institute Clearwater, Florida 20032014 Associate Medical Director and Investigator Women's Medical Research Group, LLC Clearwater, Florida 20032014 Associate Medical Director and Investigator Florida Clinical Research Group Clearwater, Florida LICENSES, CERTIFICATIONS, AND EXAMINATIONS 1996 Florida Medical License (Active) 2005 Board Certified Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility 2004 Board Certified -
FIDELITY SELECT PORTFOLIOS Form N-Q Filed 2017-01-27
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-Q Quarterly schedule of portfolio holdings of registered management investment company filed on Form N-Q Filing Date: 2017-01-27 | Period of Report: 2016-11-30 SEC Accession No. 0001379491-17-000373 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER FIDELITY SELECT PORTFOLIOS Mailing Address Business Address 245 SUMMER STREET 245 SUMMER STREET CIK:320351| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:MA | Fiscal Year End: 0228 BOSTON MA 02210 BOSTON MA 02210 Type: N-Q | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-03114 | Film No.: 17551660 617-563-7000 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-Q QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY Investment Company Act file number 811-3114 Fidelity Select Portfolios (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 245 Summer St., Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Marc Bryant, Secretary 245 Summer St. Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (Name and address of agent for service) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 617-563-7000 Date of fiscal year end: February 28 Date of reporting period: November 30, 2016 Item 1. Schedule of Investments Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Select Portfolios® Semiconductors Portfolio (formerly Electronics Portfolio) November 30, 2016 ELE-QTLY-0117 1.810682.112 Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Investments November 30, 2016 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks - 95.3% Shares Value Biotechnology - 0.0% Biotechnology - 0.0% Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -
Feasibility and First Reports of the MATCH-R Repeated Biopsy Trial At
www.nature.com/npjprecisiononcology ARTICLE OPEN Feasibility and first reports of the MATCH-R repeated biopsy trial at Gustave Roussy Gonzalo Recondo 1, Linda Mahjoubi2, Aline Maillard3, Yohann Loriot1,4, Ludovic Bigot1, Francesco Facchinetti1, Rastislav Bahleda2, Anas Gazzah2, Antoine Hollebecque2, Laura Mezquita4, David Planchard1,4, Charles Naltet4, Pernelle Lavaud4, Ludovic Lacroix1,5,6, Catherine Richon5, Aurelie Abou Lovergne7, Thierry De Baere8, Lambros Tselikas8, Olivier Deas9, Claudio Nicotra2, Maud Ngo-Camus2, Rosa L. Frias1, Eric Solary10, Eric Angevin2, Alexander Eggermont4, Ken A. Olaussen1, Gilles Vassal7, Stefan Michiels 3, ✉ Fabrice Andre 1,4, Jean-Yves Scoazec5,6, Christophe Massard1,2, Jean-Charles Soria1,4, Benjamin Besse1,4 and Luc Friboulet 1 Unravelling the biological processes driving tumour resistance is necessary to support the development of innovative treatment strategies. We report the design and feasibility of the MATCH-R prospective trial led by Gustave Roussy with the primary objective of characterizing the molecular mechanisms of resistance to cancer treatments. The primary clinical endpoints consist of analyzing the type and frequency of molecular alterations in resistant tumours and compare these to samples prior to treatment. Patients experiencing disease progression after an initial partial response or stable disease for at least 24 weeks underwent a tumour biopsy guided by CT or ultrasound. Molecular profiling of tumours was performed using whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and panel sequencing. At data cut-off for feasibility analysis, out of 333 inclusions, tumour biopsies were obtained in 303 cases (91%). From these biopsies, 278 (83%) had sufficient quality for analysis by high-throughput next generation sequencing (NGS). All 278 samples underwent targeted NGS, 215 (70.9%) RNA sequencing and 222 (73.2%) whole 1234567890():,; exome sequencing. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,815,949 B2 Cohen (45) Date of Patent: Oct
US007815949B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,815,949 B2 Cohen (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 19, 2010 (54) ESTROGENIC EXTRACTS OF MORUS ALBA 6,348,204 B1 2/2002 Touzan AND USES THEREOF 6,551,627 B1 4/2003 Yoon et al. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventor: Isaac Cohen, Piedmont, CA (US) CN 1105252 A 7, 1995 (73) Assignee: BioNovo, Inc., Emeryville, CA (US) N E. A R (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this N o g 3. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 JP 2001.002568 1, 2001 U.S.C. 154(b) by 473 days. JP 2002142717. A 5/2002 JP 2004 189609 A T 2004 (21) Appl. No.: 11/298,080 WO WO 2004/OO6946 * 1, 2004 (22) Filed: Dec. 9, 2005 OTHER PUBLICATIONS O O Supplemental EP Search Report mailed Apr. 14, 2008. (65) Prior Publication Data Ray et al., “Histological study on the effect of phytoestrogen on uterus and ovary of animal.” 196601.01, Indian Science Congress US 2006/0134245A1 Jun. 22, 2006 Association Proceedings 53(nr3);461, ISSN 0085-1817. Related U.S. Application Data EP 05853.308.4 Official Action mailed Jul. 13, 2010. AV * cited by examiner (60) Provisional application No. 60/637,302, filed on Dec. y 17, 2004. Primary Examiner Christopher R Tate Assistant Examiner—Randall Winston (51) Int. Cl. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & A6 IK36/00 (2006.01) Rosati A6 IK9/00 (2006.01) A6 IK 47/00 (2006.01) (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. Cl. ....................... 424/774; YSE Extracts of various species of the Moraceae family have estro 58) Field of Classification S h s N genic properties.