Les Référendums Sur La Souveraineté De L'écosse Et De La Catalogne

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Les Référendums Sur La Souveraineté De L'écosse Et De La Catalogne Université de Montréal Les Référendums sur la souveraineté de l’Écosse et de la Catalogne Le Renvoi relatif à la sécession du Québec en comparaison par Anthony Beauséjour Faculté de droit Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales en vue de l’obtention du grade de Legum Magister (LL.M.) Septembre 2015 © Anthony Beauséjour, 2015 Les Référendums sur la souveraineté de l’Écosse et de la Catalogne Le Renvoi relatif à la sécession du Québec en comparaison Résumé L’année 2014 est marquée par les référendums sur la souveraineté de l’Écosse et de la Catalogne, deux nations partageant de nombreux points communs sur les plans de l’histoire et de la culture. Le cadre juridique pré-référendaire de chacune de ces régions est fondamentalement le même : l’existence juridique de l’Écosse et de la Catalogne est directement issue de la volonté d’un État central unitaire, respectivement le Royaume-Uni et l’Espagne. La compétence législative de tenir un référendum sur l’autodétermination de ces régions est d’ailleurs ambiguë. Devant ce dilemme, le Royaume-Uni permet à l’Écosse d’organiser un référendum sur sa souveraineté. Il en résulte un processus démocratique juste, équitable, décisif et respecté de tous. De son côté, l’Espagne interdit à la Catalogne d’en faire de même, ce qui n’empêche pas Barcelone de tout mettre en œuvre afin de consulter sa population. Il en découle un processus de participation citoyenne n’ayant rien à voir avec un référendum en bonne et due forme. 20 ans après le dernier référendum sur la souveraineté du Québec, l’étude des référendums de l’Écosse et de la Catalogne nous permet de mettre en lumière la justesse, mais aussi l’incohérence partielle des enseignements de la Cour suprême du Canada dans son Renvoi relatif à la sécession du Québec. D’un côté, la nécessité d’équilibrer les principes constitutionnels sous-jacents de démocratie et de constitutionnalisme est mise en exergue. Parallèlement, les concepts de question et de réponse claires, d’effectivité et de négociations post-référendaires prennent une toute autre couleur face à un nouvel impératif absent des conclusions de la Cour suprême : celui des négociations pré-référendaires. Mots-clés : constitutionnalisme, démocratie, référendum, sécession, Écosse, Catalogne, Québec, Renvoi relatif à la sécession du Québec, obligation de négocier, principe d’effectivité v Abstract The year 2014 is marked by the referendums on sovereignty of Scotland and Catalonia, two nations that have a lot in common in terms of history and culture. The pre-referendum legal framework for each of these regions is basically the same: the legal existence of Scotland and Catalonia comes directly from the will of a unitary central state, respectively the United Kingdom and Spain. The legislative competence to hold a referendum on self-determination of these regions is also ambiguous. Faced with this dilemma, the United Kingdom allows Scotland to hold a referendum on sovereignty. This results in a fair democratic process, equitable, decisive and respected by all. For its part, Spain prohibits Catalonia to do the same, which does not prevent Barcelona to spare no effort to consult its population. The outcome is a public participation process that has nothing to do with a referendum in due form. 20 years after the last referendum on Quebec sovereignty, the study of the Scottish and Catalan referendums allows us to point out the accuracy but also the partial inconsistency of the teachings of the Supreme Court of Canada in its Reference re Secession of Quebec. On one hand, the need to balance the underlying constitutional principles of democracy and constitutionalism is highlighted. At the same time, the concepts of the clear question and answer, effectiveness and post-referendum negotiations take on another color in face of a new imperative that is absent from the conclusions of the Supreme Court: the pre-referendum negotiations. Keywords : constitutionalism, democracy, referendum, secession, Scotland, Catalonia, Quebec, Reference re Secession of Quebec, duty to negociate, effectivity principle vi Table des matières Résumé ........................................................................................................................................ v Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... vi Table des matières ..................................................................................................................... vii Liste des figures ......................................................................................................................... xi Liste des sigles .......................................................................................................................... xii Remerciements .......................................................................................................................... xv Note au lecteur ......................................................................................................................... xvi Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Titre I – Le cas écossais : a gentleman’s game ........................................................................... 3 Chapitre 1 – Mise en contexte .................................................................................................... 3 Section I – Historique ......................................................................................................... 3 Sous-section 1 – Origines de la nation écossaise ............................................................ 3 Sous-section 2 – Treaty of Union .................................................................................... 5 Sous-section 3 – Vers le Scotland Act ............................................................................ 6 Section II – Description de la nation écossaise ................................................................... 9 Sous-section 1 – Description économico-démographique .............................................. 9 Sous-section 2 – Description linguistique ..................................................................... 10 Sous-section 3 – Description des symboles nationaux ................................................. 11 Section III – Statut juridique de l’Écosse au sein du Royaume-Uni ................................. 12 Sous-section 1 – Dévolution en droit britannique ......................................................... 12 Paragraphe A – Statut des autorités déléguées ......................................................... 12 Paragraphe B – Création d’une autorité déléguée ..................................................... 15 Sous-section 2 – Scotland Act ....................................................................................... 16 Sous-section 3 – Modifications au Scotland Act ........................................................... 20 Chapitre 2 – Référendum du 18 septembre 2014 ...................................................................... 22 Section I – Élections générales de 2007 et de 2011 .......................................................... 22 Section II – Edinburgh Agreement ................................................................................... 26 Sous-section 1 – Négociations à distance ..................................................................... 26 vii Paragraphe A – Position britannique ........................................................................ 27 Paragraphe B – Position écossaise ............................................................................ 28 Sous-section 2 – Signature de l’entente ........................................................................ 30 Paragraphe A – Contenu de l’entente ....................................................................... 31 Paragraphe B – Nature de l’entente .......................................................................... 33 Section III – Déclenchement du référendum .................................................................... 35 Sous-section 1 – Order in council ................................................................................ 35 Sous-section 2 – Scottish Independence Referendum (Franchise) Act 2013 ................ 36 Paragraphe A – Personnes éligibles à voter .............................................................. 36 Paragraphe B – Jugement sur l’exclusion des détenus ............................................. 37 Sous-section 3 – Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013 .................................... 39 Section IV – Campagne référendaire ................................................................................ 41 Section V – Scrutin et résultats ......................................................................................... 45 Chapitre 3 – Suites du référendum ............................................................................................ 48 Section I – Démission du premier ministre écossais ........................................................ 48 Section II – The Vow ......................................................................................................... 49 Sous-section 1 – Smith Commission ............................................................................. 49 Sous-section 2 – Scotland Bill .....................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Building Churches in Scotland 96 Occupying 132 Relating – Church Buildings and Their Surroundings 164 Conclusion 200 Bibliography 212
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Building the Reformed Kirk: the cultural use of ecclesiastical buildings in Scotland, 1560–1645 by Graham T. Chernoff A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh July 2012 Abstract This thesis examines the built environment and culture of Scotland between 1560 and 1645 by analysing church buildings erected during the period. The mid-sixteenth- century ecclesiastical Reformation and mid-seventeenth-century political and ecclesiastical tumult in Scotland provide brackets that frame the development of this physical aspect of Scottish cultural history. This thesis draws most heavily on architectural and ecclesiastical history, and creates a compound of the two methods. That new compound brings to the forefront of the analysis the people who produced the buildings and for whom the church institution operated.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing English Perceptions of the Irish from the 1820S Through the 1860S
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 From Peasant to Pariah: Changing English Perceptions of the Irish from the 1820s Through the 1860s Traci J. Scully West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Scully, Traci J., "From Peasant to Pariah: Changing English Perceptions of the Irish from the 1820s Through the 1860s" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 3462. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/3462 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Peasant to Pariah: Changing English Perceptions of the Irish from the 1820s Through the 1860s Traci J. Scully Dissertation submitted to the College of Arts and Sciences At West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Joseph Hodge, Ph.D., Chair Katherine Aaslestad, Ph.D. Kate Staples, Ph.D. Lisa Weihman, Ph.D. Sandra den Otter, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voice of the People
    THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE: THE LOYAL REFORMERS' GAZETTE AND THE PASSING OF SCOTTISH REFORM 1832 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by MARK DORSEY In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts January, 2011 © Mark Dorsey, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-80045-4 Our file Notre r6f4rence ISBN: 978-0-494-80045-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantias de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberal Party in Scotland, 1843- 1868: Electoral Politics and Party Development
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Liberal party in Scotland, 1843- 1868: electoral politics and party development Gordon F. Millar Departments of Scottish and Modern History University of Glasgow Presented for the degree of Ph.D. at the University of Glasgow © Gordon F. Millar October 1994 ProQuest Number: 10992153 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10992153 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Erin, Or, Ireland's Story Told to the New Democracy
    • -' r f^?: MORRISON DAVIDSON. THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY From the collection of James Collins, Drumcondra, Ireland. Purchased, 1918. 941.5 D26b Return this book on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. University of Illinois Library -' m % m HARa^igef mi: t L161 — t)-10'v6 THE IIBMRr OF THE wnmm of illimis •' for the sky is re d And When it is evening, ye say, it will be lair weather ; tor sky is red and lowring in the morning, it will be foul weather to-day ; the O but can ye not discei a tba ye hypocrite?, ye can discern the face of the sky ; " signs of the times ? Maithdv, xvi., 2, 5. THE BOOK OF ERIN OR IRELAND'S STORY TOLD TO THE NEW DEMOCRACY. BY J. MORRISON DAVIDSON \n OF THE MIDDLE TLMi';^Ki BA R R I STER-AT-L A , Author of ''Eminent Radu'a'.sr "Th? Sen Book cf Kvigs,' "The B90h ' of Lords. v.^-"."., 6-r. Ro}al:N \>\\\ be " In the Twentieth Century War will be dead ; will live. For all there dead; Dogmas will be dead ; but Ma:i all will be but one Country— that Cuu ntr\ the whole Earth , for there will be but one Hope— the who:-.- Heaven. All liail then to the noble Twentieth Ontury which shall own our ci il .rer. ar: j which our children shall inherit V.::.'7 li-^; WILLIAM REEVES, 185, Fleet Street.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Recent Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom Lesley Dingle
    International Journal of Legal Information the Official Journal of the International Association of Law Libraries Volume 33 Article 7 Issue 1 Spring 2005 1-1-2005 A Summary of Recent Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom Lesley Dingle Bradley Miller Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ijli The International Journal of Legal Information is produced by The nI ternational Association of Law Libraries. Recommended Citation Dingle, Lesley and Miller, Bradley (2005) "A Summary of Recent Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Legal Information: Vol. 33: Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ijli/vol33/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Legal Information by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A summary of recent constitutional reform in the United Kingdom * ** LESLEY DINGLE AND BRADLEY MILLER Contents Present constitution: the status quo Background to post-1997 proposals for constitutional change Changes influenced by domestic policy post-1997 Reform of the House of Commons Reform of the House of Lords Judicial Reform Devolution Scottish Parliament Welsh Assembly Northern Ireland Assembly Devolution to English Regions Other areas of reform Monarchy and the royal prerogative Civil Service Electoral Law Proportional Representation (PR) Referenda Electoral procedures Freedom of Information legislation Changes influenced by European Legislation General European Union legislation Human Rights European Union Constitution Conclusions Present Constitution: the status quo The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland consists of four countries: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.1 *Foreign & International Law Librarian, Squire Law Library, University of Cambridge, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE STUDIES on CONSTITUTION BUILDING Professor Robert
    Mapping the Path towards Codifying - or Not Codifying - the UK Constitution CASE STUDIES ON CONSTITUTION BUILDING Professor Robert Blackburn July 2014 Mapping the Path towards Codifying - or Not Codifying - the UK Constitution _____________________________________________________________________ This collection of case studies forms part of the programme of research commissioned by the House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee from Professor Robert Blackburn, Director of the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies at King's College London, for its inquiry into Mapping the Path towards Codifying – or Not Codifying – the UK Constitution, conducted with the support of the Nuffield Foundation and Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. Editor _____________________________________________________________________ ROBERT BLACKBURN is Professor of Constitutional Law, King’s College London. He is a Solicitor of the Senior Courts, and author of public law titles in Halsbury's Laws of England, including Constitutional and Administrative Law (Volume 20), The Crown and Crown Proceedings (Volume 29) and Parliament (Volume 78). His academic works include books on The Electoral System in Britain, King and Country, Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedure, Fundamental Rights in Europe, Rights of Citizenship, The Meeting of Parliament and Constitutional Reform. He is a former Acting Head of the School of Law, and is currently Director of both the Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies (research unit) and the Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No.106) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 63) STATUTE LAW REVISION: TENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliamentby the Lord High Chancellorand the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty December 1980 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE' f4.20net Cmnd 8089 The Law Commission and the ScottishLaw Commission were , set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Kerr, Chairman Mr. Stephen M. Cretney. Mr. Stephen Edell. Mr. W. A. B. Forbes, Q.C. Dr. Peter M. North The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. B. M. F. O’Brien and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, I Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. 1 The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Hunter, V.R.D., Chairman Mr. A. E. Anton, C.B.E. Mr. R. D. D. Bertram. Mr. J. Murray, Q.C. Professor T. B. Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr. R. Eadie and its offices are at 140 Causewayside,Edinburgh, EH9 1PR. ii THE LAW COMMISSION and THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: TENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill prepared under section 3(1)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965. To theRight Honourable the Lord Hailsham ofst. Marylebone, C.H., Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourablethe Lord Mackay ofClashfern, Q.C., Her Majesty’s Advocate. * We have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1to this Report and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Imperial Perceptions in Ireland and India C. 1650 – 1800
    UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The evolution of British imperial perceptions in Ireland and India c. 1650 – 1800 Alix Geneviève Chartrand Gonville and Caius College July 2018 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy i This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. ii Acknowledgments Any research project of this magnitude is the product of extensive collaboration and I have been fortunate to receive help from people in Europe and in Canada. I wish first to underscore the patience and expertise of my supervisor Dr. Sujit Sivasundaram, who has provided great assistance throughout the writing process. The chapters have all taken shape under his guidance and have evolved far beyond the only half-coherent thoughts in which they first appeared during our supervisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petition in the Court of Session in Eighteenth-Century Scotland
    John Finlay The petition in the Court of Session in Eighteenth-century Scotland Abstract Legal petitions arose in different contexts: petitioners might seek authority to enter into an office, or they might seek some equitable remedy or relief from oppressive circumstances, or they might, in the course of litigation, seek to reclaim from an interlocutor. Petitions in the context of litigation were almost always written by professional lawyers and couched in the language of the law, but in a procedure where facts were as disputable as law, they were often lengthy and contained a great deal of incidental information. Petitions provide evidence of a range of social practices, some of which may not readily be evidenced in other sources. Depending upon their purpose, they might be brief and stereotyped in form, or they might extend to hundreds of pages of legal argument. Presenting a petition required respect for procedural norms and the use of abusive and inappropriate language would be punished by the judges. At the same time, wherever a petition was written in a litigated cause, the aim of counsel was to gain a sympathetic hearing for a client and the text was written accordingly. Petitions in Scotland did sometimes circulate publicly and were written with an eye to public consumption, either at the desire of the lawyer or the client. Generally, however, they concern private causes although even these might contain rhetorical flourishes and arguments based on fundamental ideas of political liberty. Many petitions did arise out of the public sphere, particularly in the arena of local or parliamentary electoral politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Enlightenment and Change Scotland 1746-1832 Bruce Lenman
    textbook New Edition Enlightenment and Change Scotland 1746-1832 Bruce Lenman March 2009 Pb ◦ 978 0 7486 2515 4 ◦ £19.99 240pp ◦ 216 x 138 mm Hb ◦ 978 0 7486 2514 7 ◦ £60.00 Previous Edition: Integration and Enlightenment ISBN: 978 0 7486 0385 5 (1993) A new history of Scotland during the Enlightenment Description The Author The period from the Jacobite rebellion (1745) to the Scottish Reform Act (1832) Bruce P. Lenman is Emeritus saw the rise of some of the most influential thinkers of the contemporary Professor of Modern History at world. Bruce Lenman provides a compact survey of developments in the University of St Andrews Enlightenment Scotland. and an Honorary Professor at The Reform Act spelled the end of political and social systems that had the University of Dundee. presided over industrial and agricultural revolutions turning Scotland from a rural society to one of the most urbanised and industrialised of European Series nations. Scotland also moved from being simply an active participant in the New History of Scotland cultural life of western Europe to being a leader in a new, more expansive, Atlantic and European world where the ideas of its great Enlightenment Readership thinkers circulated from Moscow to Philadelphia.The political framework for History changes was the Union of 1707 which incorporated Scotland into the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and after 1800 Great Britain and Ireland. However, Undergraduate students of within the UK a distinctive political system run for most of this period by Scottish history. Educated either the Dukes of Argyll or the so-called ‘Dundas Despotism’ dominated general readers, especially (but Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreshore and Seabed DP
    SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION Discussion Paper No 113 abcdefgh Discussion Paper on Law of the Foreshore and Seabed April 2001 This Discussion Paper is published for comment and criticism and does not represent the final views of the Scottish Law Commission EDINBURGH: THE STATIONERY OFFICE £16.00 0 10 888025 7 The Scottish Law Commission was set up by section 2 of the Law Commissions Act 1 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law of Scotland. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Gill, Chairman Patrick S Hodge, QC Professor Gerard Maher Professor Kenneth G C Reid Professor Joseph M Thomson. The Secretary of the Commission is Miss Jane L McLeod. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. The Commission would be grateful if comments on this discussion paper were submitted by 31 July 2001. Comments may be made on all or any of the matters raised in the paper. All correspondence should be addressed to: Mrs Judith A Morrison Scottish Law Commission 140 Causewayside Edinburgh EH9 1PR Tel: 0131 668 2131 Fax: 0131 662 4900 E-mail: [email protected] NOTES 1. Copies of comments received may be (i) referred to in any later report on this subject, (ii) made available to any interested party on request, and (iii) summarised on our website, unless consultees indicate that all or part of their response is confidential. Such confidentiality will of course be strictly respected. 2. For those wishing further copies of this paper for the purpose of commenting on it, the paper may be downloaded from our website at www.scotlawcom.gov.uk, or purchased from The Stationery Office Bookshops.
    [Show full text]