Approved Conservation Advice for Tasmannia Purpurascens (Broad-Leaved Pepperbush)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approved Conservation Advice for Tasmannia Purpurascens (Broad-Leaved Pepperbush) This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Approved Conservation Advice (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) Approved Conservation Advice for Tasmannia purpurascens (Broad-leaved Pepperbush) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Tasmannia purpurascens, Family Winteraceae, also known as Broad-leaved Pepperbush, is a medium to tall shrub growing 1–3 m high. This species is dioecious, with separate male and female plants. Apical buds and stems are purple coloured. Leaves are 8–18 cm long, 3–5 cm wide, green on both surfaces and purple towards the base. The leaves have a spicy or peppery smell when crushed. Flowers are 8–12 mm long with two white petals. Fruit form shiny, deep blue-black berries 1–1.5 cm long, that are held in groups of 2–6 on a peduncle (stalk) 2–4 cm long (Sampson et al., 1988). Conservation Status Broad-leaved Pepperbush is listed as vulnerable. This species is eligible for listing as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as vulnerable under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The species is also listed as vulnerable under Schedule 2 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW). Distribution and Habitat Broad-leaved Pepperbush is known from the eastern side of the NSW northern tablelands in and around Barrington Tops National Park (NP), and Ben Halls Gap NP. The species is considered widespread and abundant at these locations (Quinn et al., 1995; NSW NPWS, 2002) and its population is estimated to be several thousand (Quinn et al., 1995). Broad-leaved Pepperbush occurs in chocolate brown soils with basalt substrate. Associated vegetation includes wet, tall eucalypt forest, sub-alpine woodland and the transition zone between tall forest and cool temperate rainforest (DECC, 2005). It is found in cool temperature high rainfall areas between 1200 and 1615 m altitude (Vink, 1970; Harden, 1990). This species occurs within the Hunter–Central Rivers (NSW) Natural Resource Management Region. The distribution of this species is not known to overlap with any EPBC Act-listed threatened ecological communities. Threats The main identified threats to Broad-leaved Pepperbush include weed invasion by Scotch Broom (Cytisus scoparius); clearing of vegetation for agriculture; logging operations; grazing and trampling by feral horses (Equus caballus) and pigs (Sus scrofa); trampling by bushwalkers; and susceptibility to dieback caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi (DECC, 2005). Research Priorities Research priorities that would inform future regional and local priority actions include: Tasmannia purpurascens Conservation Advice - Page 1 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 • Design and implement a monitoring program or, if appropriate, support and enhance existing programs. • More precisely assess population size, distribution, ecological requirements including fire ecology and the relative impacts of threatening processes. • Undertake survey work in suitable habitat and potential habitat to locate any additional populations/occurrences/remnants, and notify DECC of any new occurrences (DECC, 2005). Regional Priority Actions The following regional priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of Broad-leaved Pepperbush. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification • Monitor known populations to identify key threats. • Monitor the progress of recovery, including the effectiveness of management actions and the need to adapt them if necessary. • Identify populations of high conservation priority. • Manage threats to areas of vegetation that contain populations/occurrences/remnants of Broad-leaved Pepperbush. • Ensure logging, road widening and maintenance activities (or other infrastructure or development activities as appropriate) in areas where Broad-leaved Pepperbush occurs do not adversely impact on known populations (DECC, 2005). Trampling, Browsing or Grazing • Develop and implement a stock management plan for roadside verges and travelling stock routes. Fire • Develop and implement a suitable fire management strategy for Broad-leaved Pepperbush. • Identify appropriate intensity and interval of fire to promote seed germination and vegetation regeneration. • Provide maps of known occurrences to land managers and local and state rural fire services and seek inclusion of mitigative measures in bush fire risk management plans, risk register and/or operation maps. Conservation Information • Raise awareness of Broad-leaved Pepperbush within the local community, particularly adjacent landowners, NSW State Forests, bushwalkers, and NP users. Enable Recovery of Additional Sites and/or Populations • Undertake appropriate seed collection and storage. • Investigate options for linking, enhancing or establishing additional populations. • Implement national translocation protocols (Vallee et al., 2004) if establishing additional populations is considered necessary and feasible. Local Priority Actions The following local priority recovery and threat abatement actions can be done to support the recovery of Broad-leaved Pepperbush. Habitat Loss, Disturbance and Modification • Control access routes to suitably constrain public access to known sites on public land, especially bushwalkers (DECC, 2005). • Minimise adverse impacts from land use at known sites. Tasmannia purpurascens Conservation Advice - Page 2 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 • Protect populations of the listed species through the development of further conservation agreements and/or covenants. Invasive Weeds • Develop and implement a management plan for the control of Scotch Broom in the local area (DECC, 2005). • Ensure chemicals or other mechanisms used to eradicate weeds do not have a significant adverse impact on Broad-leaved Pepperbush. Trampling, Browsing or Grazing • Manage known sites on private property to ensure appropriate stock grazing regimes are conducted. • Prevent grazing pressure at known sites on leased crown land through exclusion fencing or other barriers. • Manage threats at known sites in reserve areas to control feral horses. • Continue baiting to control population numbers of feral animals, especially feral pigs (DECC, 2005; DEWHA, 2005). Diseases, Fungi and Parasites • Monitor for evidence of outbreaks of dieback caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi (DECC, 2005). • Implement suitable hygiene protocols to protect known sites from further outbreaks of dieback caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi (EA, 2001). This list does not necessarily encompass all actions that may be of benefit to Broad-leaved Pepperbush, but highlights those that are considered to be of highest priority at the time of preparing the conservation advice. Existing Plans/Management Prescriptions that are Relevant to the Species • Barrington Tops National Park, Mount Royal National Park and Barrington Tops State Conservation Area – Draft Plan of Management (DECC, 2007), • Ben Halls Gap National Park – Plan of Management (NSW NPWS, 2002), • Threat Abatement Plan for Dieback caused by the Root-root Fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi (EA, 2001), and • Threat Abatement Plan for Predation, Habitat Degradation, Competition and Disease Transmission by Feral Pigs (DEWHA, 2005). These prescriptions were current at the time of publishing; please refer to the relevant agency’s website for any updated versions. Information Sources: Department of Environment & Climate Change New South Wales (DECC) 2005, Broad-leaved Pepperbush – Profile, viewed 15 April 2008, <http://www.threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au/tsprofile/profile.aspx?id=10797> Department of Environment & Climate Change New South Wales (DECC) 2007, Barrington Tops National Park, Mount Royal National Park and Barrington Tops State Conservation Area – Draft Plan of Management, viewed 15 April 2008, <http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/parks/Barrington_mgmtplan_draft.pdf> Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) 2005, Threat Abatement Plan for Predation, Habitat Degradation, Competition and Disease Transmission by Feral Pigs, viewed 15 April 2008, <http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/pig/index.html> Environment Australia (EA) 2001, Threat Abatement Plan for Dieback caused by the Root-root Fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi, viewed 15 April 2008, <http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/phytophthora/index.html> Tasmannia purpurascens Conservation Advice - Page 3 of 4 This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister / Delegate of the Minister on: 1/10/2008 Harden, GJ (Ed.) 1990, Flora of New South Wales, vol.1, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, pp. 125-127. NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service (NSW NPWS) 2002, Ben Halls Gap National Park – Plan of Management, viewed 15 April 2008, <http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/parks/pomFinalBenhallsgap.pdf> Quinn, F, Williams, JB, Gross, CL & Bruhl, J 1995, Report on rare and threatened plants of north-eastern New South Wales, University of New England, Armidale. Sampson, FB, Williams, JB & Woodland, PS 1988, ‘The morphology and taxonomic position of Tasmannia glaucifolia (Winteraceae), a new Australian species’, Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 395-413. Vallee, L, Hogbin, T, Monks, L, Makinson, B, Matthes, M & Rossetto, M 2004, Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia – Second Edition, Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. Vink, W 1970, ‘The Winteraceae of the old world’, Blumea, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 225-354. Tasmannia purpurascens Conservation Advice - Page 4 of 4 .
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Ecological Impact of Broom (Cytisus Scoparius) At
    6 Plant Protection Quarterly VoI.9(1) 1994 Since ]986 broom has continued to spread at Barrington Tops. Seeds may be The changing ecological impact of broom (Cytisus dispersed over long distances by streams, scoparius) by animals (horses, pigs, humans) and on at Barrington Tops, New South Wales or in vehicles and machinery (Smith and Ha rl en 1991) . This has led to establish­ J. M. B. Smith, Department of Geography and Planning, University o f New ment of new individ uals and stands along England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. streams, in open, grazed places, and par­ ticularly along tracks and roads even sev­ eral kilome tres from previous infesta­ Summary tions. In recent years attempts have been The invasive European shrub broom a nd tree regene ra tion in the Polblue area made by the Forestry Commission, Na­ (CytisJls scoparills) was introduced to of Barrington Tops in 1986. Broom stands tional Parks and Wildlife Service, local the Barrington Tops plateau during the up to several hectares in area were then landholders and other land managers to 18405 and has spread particularly rap­ generally very dense and shady; the larg­ chemically or physically control such out­ id ly since 1969. In the Polblue area est shrubs at her study sites were aged by lying populations, and to keep road edges stands are now mainly over ten years old cOW1ting growth rings in basal stem discs, and o ther heavily frequented a reas dear and consist of fewer, larger and more and found to be 4-12 years old. She found of broom .
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter 7 (4)
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 7 | Issue 4 Article 9 1972 Back Matter 7 (4) Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Recommended Citation (1972) "Back Matter 7 (4)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 7: Iss. 4, Article 9. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol7/iss4/9 ALISO VoL. 7, No. 4, pp. 539-556 J ULY 20, 1972 THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT RANcHo SANTA ANA BoTANIC GARDEN 1971 It is a pleasure for me to present an account of the activities at the botanic garden for the year 1971. Except for the effec's of the weather which are given elsewhere in this report, the year was one of steady and sound development. The building program of the previous year had been completed, and early in 1971 landscaping around the annex was finis3ed and the grounds once again were quiet and serene, suitable for study and contemplation by the thousands of persons who visit the garden each year. Among events which undoubtedly will mark this year in the garden's history are two, especially, which should be mentioned. The botanic garden is a member of the American Association of Museums and durinJ; the year we applied for accreditation by that organization. In August we were notified that we had been granted interim approval until an on-site evalu1tion of the institution could be made by the AAM Accredit1tion Visitin~ Commit­ tee. This visit is expected early in 1972. The second item of interest is that the botanic garden for the first time applied for a plant patent to cover a new hybrid which soon will be released to the horticultural trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter-Central Rivers, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Plants Suitable for Tamworth Regional Council Areas
    Australian Plants Suitable for Tamworth Regional Council Areas Eucalyptus blakelyi Photo Tony Croft Tamworth Group of Australian Plants Society As at July 2007 Eucalyptus blakelyi II TAMWORTH REGIONAL COUNCIL RAINFALL DATA Most of the Tamworth Regional Council area receives an average annual rainfall of 600 to 800mm except for the north- west corner on the Mount Kaputar plateau and the tablelands country from Bendemeer through Woolbrook to Hanging Rock above Nundle which often receives between 800 to 1000mm. Similarly temperatures vary across the region with average annual minimums on the tablelands and nearby areas between 6 and 9 degrees Celsius. A series of frosts are received across the entire region each winter. Average annual maximums are between 18 and 21 degrees on the tablelands, 21 to 24 degrees across most of the region and 24 to 27 degrees in the west of the region. 1. Barraba 2. Manilla 250 180 160 200 140 120 150 2004/2005 100 2004-2005 80 100 Average Average 60 50 40 20 0 0 il il ec Jan eb ay ec Jan eb ay July Aug Sept Oct Nov D F Apr M June July Aug Sept Oct Nov D F Apr M June March March 3. Nundle 4.Tamworth 250 200 250 200 m 150 2004-2005 2003-2004 150 2003-2004 Average 100 100 2004-2005 m in Rainfall 50 50 0 y t l e 0 ct an h J rc Jul gust Sep O Nov Dec Feb Apri May Jun n b y Ma uly Oct e rch pril une Au J Aug Sept Nov Dec Ja F a A Ma J M Recent and Average Rainfall for Barraba, Manilla, Nundle, Tamworth and Woolbrook Location Rainfall Rainfall Average 2004-2005 2003-2004 Rainfall in mm in mm in mm Barraba 780.9 689 Manilla 627.9 498.1 651.4 Not Nundle 793.7 868 Available Tamworth 629.6 759.2 673 Woolbrook 686.8 784.5 783 More detailed weather information can be found on the Bureau of Meteorology website.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to the Rare and Threatened Plant Species of Barrington Tops
    172 Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.15(4) 2000 the main infestation by using an inte- Strategy to include new areas of the Na- ssp. scoparius. In ‘The biology of Aus- grated management strategy. In addition tional Park. tralian weeds’ Volume 2, eds F.D. to the containment program, effective Panetta, R.H. Groves and R.C.H. monitoring and continued research are an References Shepherd, pp. 77-88. (R.G. and F.J. integral component of managing broom in Adams, B. (2000). Raising awareness of Richardson, Melbourne). the future. The use of biological control the broom (Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link) Howard, C. (1995). Hunter District Sub- agents is regarded as the only economic problem on the Barrington Tops. Pro- mission to the Wilderness Assessment long-term method of reducing the size of ceedings of the broom symposium held Report for Barrington Tops. Unpub- the main broom infestations. A planned at Ellerston and Moonan, 16–17 No- lished report. systematic redistribution program for bio- vember 1998, eds A.W. Sheppard and Leys, A. (1998). NSW National Parks and logical control agents will be undertaken J.R. Hosking. Plant Protection Quarterly Wildlife Service Summary of Pest Man- in collaboration with researchers once 15, 139-40. agement Programs 1997/98. Unpub- numbers of agents build up. Briggs, J.D. and Leigh, J.H. (1996). ‘Rare or lished. threatened Australian plants’. (CSIRO NPWS (1989). Draft plan of management Acknowledgments Publishing, Melbourne). of Barrington Tops National Park, New We would like to thank M. Newton, Sen- Heinrich, A. and Dowling, B. (1998). Rare South Wales National Parks and Wild- ior Field Supervisor, NPWS, for informa- and threatened plant survey of life Service, Raymond Terrace office of tion on broom control on the Barrington Barrington Tops National Park - pla- NPWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and the Vegetation of the Namoi CMA (Draft)
    ________________________________________________________________________________ Fire and the Vegetation of the Namoi CMA (Draft) D. Tierney & P. Watson June 2009 ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Nature Conservation Council NSW ________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. FIRE ECOLOGY – SOME IMPORTANT CONCEPTS 4 3. THE VEGETATION OF THE NAMOI CMA 16 4. FIRE IN GRASSLANDS 20 5. FIRE IN GRASSY WOODLANDS 37 6. FIRE IN SEMI-ARID WOODLANDS 50 7. FIRE IN HEATHLANDS 59 8. FIRE IN DRY SCLEROPHYLL FORESTS 70 9. FIRE IN WET SCLEROPHYLL FORESTS 106 10. FIRE IN RAINFORESTS 123 11 SUMMARY 132 REFERENCES 136 Acknowledgements Many people have generously offered support for this project. In particular Peter Clarke is thanked for making time to discuss his current fire ecology research and that of his colleagues. Suggested citation: Fire and the vegetation of the Namoi CMA, D Tierney & P Watson (2009) A report prepared by the Hotspots project, Nature Conservation Council, New South Wales, 301Kent St, Sydney. Front page: Semi-arid woodland east of Walgett, D. Tierney 2009. ________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Nature Conservation Council NSW ________________________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Guide North Coast Local Land Services
    Travelling Stock Reserves Vegetation Guide North Coast Local Land Services This project has been funded by NSW Environmental Trust North Coast Local Land Services Travelling Stock Reserve Vegetation Guide Prepared for NSW Local Land Services Prepared by: David Carr, Stringybark Ecological Date: February 2020 Funded by: NSW Environmental Trust. This work draws heavily on material from the website of the Office of Environment and Heritage. The authors of this guide do not claim authorship, nor accept responsibility for, content drawn from this site. All photographs by David Carr unless indicated. Cover image: North Coast Wet Sclerophyll Forest growing adjacent to a creek near Bucca, NSW North Coast Local Land Services Travelling Stock Reserves | Vegetation Guide Contents Vegetation in the North Coast Local Land Services region 1 Vegetation formations in the North Coast Local Land Services region 2 Vegetation classes 3 Clarence Dry Sclerophyll Forests 5 Hunter-Macleay Dry Sclerophyll Forests 6 New England Dry Sclerophyll Forests 7 Northern Gorge Dry Sclerophyll Forests 8 North Coast Dry Sclerophyll Forests 9 Northern Escarpment Dry Sclerophyll Forests 10 Coastal Swamp Forests 11 Eastern Riverine Forests 12 Coastal Valley Grassy Woodlands 13 Subtropical Rainforests 15 Dry Rainforests 17 Northern Hinterland Wet Sclerophyll Forests 19 Northern Tablelands Wet Sclerophyll Forests 20 North Coast Wet Sclerophyll Forests 21 Northern Escarpment Wet Sclerophyll Forests 23 Threatened Ecological Communities 24 Coastal Saltmarsh in the New South Wales
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plant Species from Northern NSW That May Be Used As Food Plants
    List of plant species from northern NSW that may be used as food plants SPECIES COMMON NAME LOCATION USE Acacia baileyana (Fabaceae Cootamundra Wattle This species is This species is found in the Widely used as an ornamental plant. (Mimosoideae)) introduced to the following botanical regions: Found in the NSW flora at: region. Northern Tablelands 2nd volume, on page 386 North-west Slopes North-west Plains Acacia binervia (Fabaceae Coast Myall This species is found in the The leaves contain prussic acid making them poisonous to stock. (Mimosoideae)) following botanical regions: Found in the NSW flora at: Northern Tablelands 2nd volume, on page 348 Acacia concurrens Curracabah This species is found in the The unripe fruit cause severe discomfort in the mouth and throat. (Fabaceae (Mimosoideae)) following botanical regions: Found in the NSW flora at: Northern Tablelands 2nd volume, on page 352 Acacia decurrens (Fabaceae Black Wattle This species is found in the The bark of trees at last 7 years old was harvested and stored for a year before preparation (Mimosoideae)) following botanical regions: and use as an astringent (including being exported to Britain). The exuded gum, dissolved Found in the NSW flora at: North-west Slopes in water, can be used as a treatment for inflamed mucous membranes. 2nd volume, on page 390 North-west Plains Acacia farnesiana (Fabaceae Mimosa Bush This species is found in the The Aborigines are recorded as eating the pods after roasting them. The flowers are the (Mimosoideae)) following botanical regions: source of the perfume oil cassie, the gums are astringent and used in treating inflamed Found in the NSW flora at: Northern Tablelands mucous membranes, and the Javanese use the juice squeezed from unripe pods for 2nd volume, on page 392 North-west Slopes bathing the eyes and as a plaster over wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2. Características De Los Integrantes Del Clado Magnoliides
    19 19 2.2. Características de los integrantes del Clado Magnoliides 2.2.1. Orden Canellales Este orden, hermano de Piperales, está formado por dos familias Winteraceae y Canellaceae y ha sido reconocido como un orden nuevo por el APG II (2003). Ambas familias presentan una venación irregular y características similares en la estela. La familia Winteraceae ha sido de mucho interés debido a la ausencia de vasos en el xilema y a sus carpelos plegados, caracteres que han sido considerados secundarios y la vascularización de sus semillas indican una clara relación con las Canellaceae (Soltis et al., 2005). 2.2.1.1. Winteraceae 2.2.1.1.a. Características ¾ Porte: árboles o arbustos glabros. ¾ Hojas: alternas, simples, enteras, finamente pelúcidas, sin estípulas. ¾ Flores: solitarias y terminales, o a menudo, en inflorescencias cimosas terminales o axilares. Perfectas o, algunas veces imperfectas, hipóginas. ¾ Perianto: receptáculo corto; sépalos 2-4 (-6), valvados, a menudo libres o connados sólo en la base; pétalos (2-) 5 –varios, comúnmente en dos verticilos, libres, pequeños y pajosos o grandes y petaloides. ¾ Estambres: numerosos, iniciados centrípetamente, pero madurados centrífugamente, libres, generalmente en forma de cintas o laminares, tetrasporangiados; anteras ditecas. ¾ Gineceo: carpelos (1-) varios, en un verticilo, libres o ligeramente connados, márgenes estigmáticos parcialmente abiertos. Óvulos 1- varios, marginales o laminares. ¾ Fruto: baya o folículos, o algunas veces más o menos connados o concrescentes o cápsula multilocular o sincarpio. ¾ Semilla: con embrión pequeño y abundante y aceitoso endosperma. Flor mostrando seis pétalos de la Flor desprovista de pétalos, con fragmentos corola, numerosos estambres y un corto del cáliz gamosépalo caliptriforme, número de carpelos en el ápice numerosos estambres y cinco carpelos gibosos, pluriovulados Detalles de las flores de Drymis winteri (extraídos de Böelcke y Vizinis, 1987) 2.2.1.1.b.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Survey, Gloucester & Chichester Management Areas, Central
    This document has been scanned from hard-copy archives for research and study purposes. Please note not all information may be current. We have tried, in preparing this copy, to make the content accessible to the widest possible audience but in some cases we recognise that the automatic text recognition maybe inadequate and we apologise in advance for any inconvenience this may cause. FLORA SURVEY, GLOUCESTER AND CHICHESTER MANAGEMENT AREAS, CENTRAL REGION, NEW SOUTH WALES By Doug Binns S TAT E FORESTS RESEARCH DIVISION Forest Resources Series No. 34 December, 1995 The Author: Doug Binns, Research Officer, Forestry Ecology Section, Research Division, State Forests of New South Wales. Published by: Research Division, State Forests of New South Wales, 27 Oratava Avenue, West Pennant Hills, 2125 P.O. Box 100, Beecroft 2119 Australia. Copyright © 1995 by State Forests of New South Wales DDC 581.099442 ISSN 1033 1220 ISBN 073106724 X CONTENTS ABSTRACT III INT..R.ODUCTION 1 METHODS 2 1. PLOTLOCATION 2 2. FLORISTIC AND VEGETA110N STRUCTURAL DATA 5 3. HABITATDATA 5 4. LIMITA110NS 6 5. TAXONOMYAND NOMENCLATURE 6 6. DATA ANALYSIS 7 RESULTS 9 1. FLORISTICS 9 2. OVERSTOREYCOMlvfUNlTIES 9 3. NON-EUCALYPT ("UNDERSTOREY'') FLORISTIC COMMUNITIES 15 4. DESCRIPTIONS OFPLANTCOMlvfUNlTIES 16 A.RAINFOREST 16 B. MOIST COASTAL EUCALYPT FOREST 20 C. DRY COASTAL EUCALYPT FOREST 21 D. PLATEAU GRASSY EUCALYPT FOREST 24 E. PLATEAU RIPARIAN AND SHRUBBY OPEN FOREST 25 F. HEATII FOREST, LOW FOREST AND SHRUBLAND 26 G. PLATEAUWETHEATIIAND SEDGELAND 28 5. LOGGING IMPACT 29 DISCUSSION 32 1. SIGNIFICANTPLANTSPECIES 32 (aj Nationally significant species 32 (b) Other species o/significance 36 2.
    [Show full text]
  • World Heritage and Associative Natural Values of the Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia
    WORLD HERITAGE AND ASSOCIATIVE NATURAL VALUES OF THE CENTRAL EASTERN RAINFOREST RESERVES OF AUSTRALIA R. John Hunter NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Originally published June 2003 Revised December 2004 i By channels of coolness the echoes are calling And down the dim gorge I hear the creek falling It lives in the mountains where mosses and sedges Touch with their beauty the bank and the ledges Through breaks in the cedar and sycamore bowers Struggles the light that is sweet to the flowers; And softer than slumber and sweeter than singing, The notes of the bell-birds are running and ringing. ‘Bellbirds’ by Henry Kendall ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report reviews the World Heritage values of the Central Eastern Rainforest Reserves of Australia (CERRA) World Heritage Area. The assessment of World Heritage values is based on the criteria for World Heritage listing. CERRA was inscribed on the World Heritage list as a site with outstanding universal significance in terms of its natural heritage. The property satisfied three of the four possible criteria for the listing of a natural property. The criteria for World Heritage listing have changed since the listing of CERRA, but this has little effect on this review because the changes generally amount to a re-arrangement of themes within the criteria for which the property is listed. This review identifies attributes, which demonstrate the values under each criterion. Threats to these attributes are identified and the condition of integrity is assessed. World Heritage values Criterion (i): ‘be outstanding examples representing major stages of Earth’s history, including the record of life, significant on-going geological processes in the development of landforms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features.’ Values related to this criterion and key attributes supporting these values are as follows.
    [Show full text]