DOCSLIB.ORG

Electromagnetic Railgun INP (Innovative Naval Prototype)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Electromagnetic Railgun INP (Innovative Naval Prototype) Electromagnetic Railgun INP (Innovative Naval Prototype) CDR Carl Carney 2016 EDO Symposium 29 APR – 01MAY 2016 EM Railgun INP • S&T Customers: ONR Code 35 • Transition Customers: – PMS 405—PEO Ships • CAPT Ziv – Dual Hatted with IWS • ONR-RC Focus Areas: – Technology • RC Project Lead: CDR Carl Carney – NSWC Dahlgren Support: CDR Cynthia Holland For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Is this what you think of when you hear RAILGUN? 80 cm German Gun “Dora” circa 1942 THINK AGAIN!! For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change ONR / NRL Science and Technology: Taking Science Fiction… • Transformers 2 – Video 1 For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Hollywood – Style Navy Railguns Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, Paramount Pictures (2009) For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change …and Making Science Fact • NRL—2 lines: Medium Cal MTF & small bore SRG – Video2 & – 3 Video3 – • NSWC Dahlgren--5 lines and increasing For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change NSWC Dahlgren 32-MJ Launch Event For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Dahlgren Dispense Video For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change BAE ACL Firing Video For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Naval S&T Portfolio Broad 5-20 years Discovery & Invention 4-8 years (Basic and Applied Leap Ahead Science) 2-4 years Focus Innovations Technology (Innovative Naval Prototypes) Maturation 1-2 years ≈ 12% ≈ 45% (FNCs, etc) Quick Reaction & Other S&T ≈ 30% ≈ 8% Narrow Near Time Frame Long For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Transitioning Science and Technology Transitioning Science and Technology to a Program of Record Crossing the Valley of Death For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change The Valley of Death The Divide Between S&T and Program Management S&T Enables R&D Purpose of S&T: – Creates technological advantage and revolutionary capabilities for the warfighter – Informs early warfighting concept development in the “science of the possible” – Fuels innovation across DOTMLPF, not only materiel solutions – Informs the requirements development process – Prevents technological surprise Maturation: Ideation • Nurture the Gather the • Promote • Growth • S&T Phase: Inputs Maturity, • Military • Deliver S&T to SYSCOMs and PEOs Plant the Tech Demo • Application Seeds Risk of High High Moderate Low - Success Expected failure* • • • • Budget 6.1 Basic Research 6.2 Applied 6.3 Advanced Tech 6.4 Advanced 6.5 System 6.6 RDT&E 6.7 Operation “Valley of Death” Activity Science Principles Research Demo component Development and Management System Discoveries Application of Prototypes and (BA)/ development and Demonstration Support Development (Phenomenology) research to demonstrators prototype RDT&E military problems (Utility) Objective: (Feasibility) S&T R&D For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Valley of Death Issues 1. The Innovative Naval Prototype Model is designed to take a high risk disruptive technology and mitigate those risks by: a. Developing science and engineering /integration in parallel. a. NRL developing the science and has 2 systems b. NSWC Dahlgren has 2 major cal systems and 4 or so medium cal systems c. Intent is to find out where we fail and fail early so as to find solutions in the R&D phase prior to initiation of program of record 2. Challenges still to be conquered a. We have not settled on a rail material set yet b. Corrosion issues are just now being looked at c. No one has gotten a railgun barrel “wet” yet, and this is going on the bow of a ship d. Simulation and prediction needs to be better, which means that coupled physics elements and transient material properties need to be better e. Isolating RG from rest of ship’s grid during firing will be important 3. Railgun is NOT a program of record yet a. There is still time to address these issues prior to milestone 0/milestone 1 b. Due to be a program of record in about 2 years—probably ACAT 1 or 1A For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change DoD Technologies that Changed Warfighting EM Railgun INP Phase II FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Rep-Rate Pulsed Power Prototype Fabrication & Install Demo Rep Rate Lab Launcher with Design Initial Rep-Rate Fabrication & Install Rep-Rate Demo Auto-Loader (Enables 100+ NM application) 5MJ Rep-Rate Testing EMLF Test Facility Rep Rate NSWCDD Industry Launcher Concept Design Preliminary – Detail Design and Fabrication Industry Launcher Rep-Rate Demo INP II Focused on Rep-Rate and Thermal Management For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change EM Railgun INP: The Technology • What a Railgun is NOT: For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change EM Railgun INP Technology • What a Railgun is NOT: • Coil Gun Systems are the “Mac Truck” of EM Launch – Accelerate tons of payload to 100s of MPH/KPH For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change EM Railgun INP Technology • What A Railgun Is: Launch by electricity alone – Accelerates a modest 15 – 30 kg weight to Mach 7.5 + – Direct Current (DC Device)—single turn motor – Is a High Current Device (millisecond time scale) – Requires Metal to metal Sliding contact between rails – Uses Base-Push Armature: Projectile not part of circuit Flight body Conducting armature Front bore rider and scoop Rails For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Basic Railgun Operating Principle Operating Principle Cross-Section (4)(4) SabotSabot andand armaturearmature discards (3) Force from magnetic field and armature current pushes projectile down barrel Insulator B Rail F Composite Wrap (2) Switch closes, current J flows through cables, rails & armature (1) Electrical energy stored in Lorentz Force = Current (J) X Magnetic Field (B) capacitor bank or Lorentz Force =1/2 Inductance Gradient (L’) * Current (I)^2 For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change MTF Railgun Operation Main Closing Modern railguns use Switch high energy density caps and solid state switches Inductor Armature Rails I I I 0 I 0 Capacitive Crowbar Switch 0 Energy Storage Traps Energy in Inductor 0 Current 0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 Breech Voltage Velocity Muzzle Voltage For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change EM Railgun INP Technology • Railguns are the Formula 1 race cars of EM Launch – Zero to Mach 7.5+ in 6 to 10 Meters (or less) For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Railgun Operational Impact • Wide Area Coverage – Increased speed to target – Long range fire • Accelerates operational tempo – Faster attrition of enemy personnel and equipment – Operation timeline shifts left • Reduces Cost per Kill – Lower Unit Cost – Lower handling cost • Enhances Safety – No risk of sympathetic detonation – Simplified storage, transportation and replenishment • Multi-Mission Capability – Reduced collateral damage • Surface Warfare – No unexploded ordnance on • Missile Defense battlefield • Long Range Fires • Reduces Logistics • Direct Fire – Eliminates gun powder trail • ASuW – Deep magazines Multi-Mission Capable for Offense and Defense For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Range and Trajectory for Future Guns Systems EM Gun can provide 100 – 200+ nm range for precision guided munitions TOTAL RANGE (km) 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 500 160 Future 80 Current Assault 140 STOM Range Requirement Requirement 70 (MV-22) 120 64MJ RAILGUN 2007-17 196240 sq miles (@ 250 nm) 60 6 min time of flight 100 7 Ships, 2 guns, 5000 rnds /Ship 50 EML Projectile IOC: 2020 80 32MJ RAILGUN OPTION 45216 sq miles (@ 120 nm) 40 Altitude (nm) Altitude (km) 4 min time of flight 60 32MJ EML Projectile 30 155 mm / LRLAP AGS 40 •29544 sq miles (@ 97 nm) 20 5 •6 min flight @ max rng ” / ERM •7 ships, 2 guns, 600 rnds/ship 20 10 5”/54 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 TOTAL RANGE (nm) For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change EM Railgun INP Relevance to Warfighter and Navy • Impact: Mach 7.5 beats conventional Mach 1 to Mach 3 every time! – Shock and Awe taken to the next level – Multiple missions and relatively small footprint • NRL(indoor range) NSWC_DD(outdoor range) For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change Relevance to Warfighter and Navy • Three potential employment schemes to-date: – 1. Indirect fire mission (Naval Gun Fire Support) – 2. Direct Fire (Battle Group Defense from hypersonic threats) – 3. Forward Operating Base defense (“Iron Dome”) For instructional purposes only. Actual schedules and platforms subject to change High Current Sliding Contacts Dominate Railgun Physics High pressure metal-metal Sliding Contact Velocity • contact • Time and velocity dependent High Armature Pressure current distributions Velocity comparable to field Magnetic Field • (current) penetration times Current Velocity Rail Current Railgun by the Numbers • Projectile Energy – 20 kg LP with 15 kg flight body – Kinetic energy shell – penetrator
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Direct Current (DC) Theory
    PDHonline Course E235 (4 PDH) Electrical Fundamentals - Introduction to Direct Current (DC) Theory Instructor: A. Bhatia, B.E. 2012 PDH Online | PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.PDHonline.org www.PDHcenter.com An Approved Continuing Education Provider CHAPTER 3 DIRECT CURRENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Upon completing this chapter, you will be able to: 1. Identify the term schematic diagram and identify the components in a circuit from a simple schematic diagram. 2. State the equation for Ohm's law and describe the effects on current caused by changes in a circuit. 3. Given simple graphs of current versus power and voltage versus power, determine the value of circuit power for a given current and voltage. 4. Identify the term power, and state three formulas for computing power. 5. Compute circuit and component power in series, parallel, and combination circuits. 6. Compute the efficiency of an electrical device. 7. Solve for unknown quantities of resistance, current, and voltage in a series circuit. 8. Describe how voltage polarities are assigned to the voltage drops across resistors when Kirchhoff's voltage law is used. 9. State the voltage at the reference point in a circuit. 10. Define open and short circuits and describe their effects on a circuit. 11. State the meaning of the term source resistance and describe its effect on a circuit. 12. Describe in terms of circuit values the circuit condition needed for maximum power transfer. 13. Compute efficiency of power transfer in a circuit. 14. Solve for unknown quantities of resistance, current, and voltage in a parallel circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dc–Dc Converter with High-Voltage Step-Up Ratio and Reduced- Voltage Stress for Renewable Energy Generation Systems
    A DC–DC CONVERTER WITH HIGH-VOLTAGE STEP-UP RATIO AND REDUCED- VOLTAGE STRESS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEMS A Dissertation by Satya Veera Pavan Kumar Maddukuri Master of Science, University of Greenwich, UK, 2012 Bachelor of Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University Kakinada, India, 2010 Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2018 1 © Copyright 2018 by Satya Veera Pavan Kumar Maddukuri All Rights Reserved 1 A DC–DC CONVERTER WITH HIGH-VOLTAGE STEP-UP RATIO AND REDUCED- VOLTAGE STRESS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEMS The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. ___________________________________ Aravinthan Visvakumar, Committee Chair ___________________________________ M. Edwin Sawan, Committee Member ___________________________________ Ward T. Jewell, Committee Member ___________________________________ Chengzong Pang, Committee Member ___________________________________ Thomas K. Delillo, Committee Member Accepted for the College of Engineering ___________________________________ Steven Skinner, Interim Dean Accepted for the Graduate School ___________________________________ Dennis Livesay, Dean iii DEDICATION To my parents, my wife, my in-laws, my teachers, and my dear friends iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Aravinthan Visvakumar for the continuous support of my PhD study and related research, for his thoughtful patience, motivation, and immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructor's Guide
    Instructor’s Guide Electricity: A 3-D Animated Demonstration ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM Introduction This instructor’s guide provides information to help you get the most out of Electricity and Magnetism, part of the eight-part series Electricity: A 3-D Animated Demonstration. The series makes the principles of electricity easier to understand and discuss. The series includes Electrostatics; Electric Current; Ohm's Law; Circuits; Power and Efficiency; Electricity and Magnetism; Electric Motors; and Electric Generators. Electricity and Magnetism traces the relationship between magnetism and electricity from the first accidental discovery of induced current. Learning Objectives After watching the video program, students will be able to: • Describe the relationship between electricity and magnetism • Explain the difference between electric and magnetic fields • Explain the construct, function, and use of solenoids • Differentiate between, explain, and apply the left-hand and right-hand rules • Demonstrate (via experiments) and explain aspects, and actions and functions of electricity, magnetism, and electromagnetism Educational Standards National Science Standards This program correlates with the National Science Education Standards from the National Academies of Science, and Project 2061, from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Copyright © 2008 SHOPWARE® • www.shopware-usa.com • 1-800-487-3392 Electricity: A 3-D Animated Demonstration ELECTRICITY AND MAGNETISM INSTRUCTOR’S GUIDE Science as Inquiry Content Standard A:
    [Show full text]
  • Faraday's Law Da
    Faraday's Law dA B B r r Φ≡B •d A B ∫ dΦ ε= − B dt Faraday’s Law of Induction r r Recall the definition of magnetic flux is ΦB =B∫ ⋅ d A Faraday’s Law is the induced EMF in a closed loop equal the negative of the time derivative of magnetic flux change in the loop, d r r dΦ ε= −B∫ d ⋅= A − B dt dt Constant B field, changing B field, no induced EMF causes induced EMF in loop in loop Getting the sign EMF in Faraday’s Law of Induction Define the loop and an area vector, A, who magnitude is the Area and whose direction normal to the surface. A The choice of vector A direction defines the direction of EMF with a right hand rule. Your thumb in A direction and then your fingers point to positive EMF direction. Lenz’s Law – easier way! The direction of any magnetic induction effect is such as to oppose the cause of the effect. ⇒ Convenient method to determine I direction Heinrich Friedrich Example if an external magnetic field on a loop Emil Lenz is increasing, the induced current creates a field opposite that reduces the net field. (1804-1865) Example if an external magnetic field on a loop is decreasing, the induced current creates a field parallel to the that tends to increase the net field. Incredible shrinking loop: a circular loop of wire with a magnetic flux is shrinking with time. In which direction is the induced current? (a) There is none. (b) CW.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching H. C. Ørsted's Scientific Work in Danish High School Physics
    UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN FACULTY OF SCIENCE Ida Marie Monberg Hindsholm Teaching H. C. Ørsted's Scientific Work in Danish High School Physics Masterʹs thesis Department of Science Education 19 July 2018 Master's thesis Teaching H. C. Ørsted’s Scientific Work in Danish High School Physics Submitted 19 July 2018 Author Ida Marie Monberg Hindsholm, B.Sc. E-mail [email protected] Departments Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen Main supervisor Ricardo Avelar Sotomaior Karam, Associate Professor, Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen Co-supervisor Steen Harle Hansen, Associate Professor, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen 1 Contents 1 Introduction . 1 2 The Material: H. C. Ørsted's Work . 3 2.1 The Life of Hans Christian Ørsted . 3 2.2 Ørsted’s Metaphysical Framework: The Dynamical Sys- tem............................. 6 2.3 Ritter and the failure in Paris . 9 2.4 Ørsted’s work with acoustic and electric figures . 12 2.5 The discovery of electromagnetism . 16 2.6 What I Use for the Teaching Sequence . 19 3 Didactic Theory . 20 3.1 Constructivist teaching . 20 3.2 Inquiry Teaching . 22 3.3 HIPST . 24 4 The Purpose and Design of the Teaching Sequence . 27 4.1 Factual details and lesson plan . 28 5 Analysis of Transcripts and Writings . 40 5.1 Method of Analysis . 40 5.2 Practical Problems . 41 5.3 Reading Original Ørsted's Texts . 42 5.4 Inquiry and Experiments . 43 5.5 "Role play" - Thinking like Ørsted . 48 5.6 The Reflection Corner . 51 5.7 Evaluation: The Learning Objectives .
    [Show full text]
  • AC Vs. DC Boost Converters: a Detailed Conduction Loss Comparison
    AC vs. DC Boost Converters: A Detailed Conduction Loss Comparison Daniel L Gerber Fariborz Musavi Building Technology and Urban Systems Engineering and Computer Science Lawrence Berkeley Labs Washington State University Berkeley, CA, USA Vancouver, WA, USA [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Studies have shown the efficiency benefits of DC dis- at the same voltage. Although several previous works have tribution systems are largely due to the superior performance of analyzed and established loss models for the DC/DC [9]– DC/DC converters. Nonetheless, these studies are often based on [12] and AC/DC PFC [13]–[20] boost converters, they each product data that differs widely in manufacturer and operating have their own methods and formulae, making an analytic voltage. This work develops a rigorous loss model to theoretically comparison difficult. In addition, many of them neglect es- compare the efficiency of a DC/DC and an AC/DC PFC boost sential components such as the input bridge drop and output converter. It ensures each converter has the same components and equivalent operating voltages. The results show AC boost capacitor equivalent series resistance (ESR). This is the first converters below 500 W to have 2.9 to 4.2 times the loss of DC. work to establish a set of formulae that compare the loss between an AC and DC boost converter, both of which have the Keywords—DC microgrid, boost converter, loss model, power same components and equivalent operating voltages. Although factor correction DC/DC converters are already known to be more efficient, this work reports exactly how much more.
    [Show full text]
  • Faraday's Law Da
    Faraday's Law dA B B r r Φ≡B •d A B ∫ dΦ ε= − B dt Applications of Magnetic Induction • AC Generator – Water turns wheel Æ rotates magnet Æ changes flux Æ induces emf Æ drives current • “Dynamic” Microphones (E.g., some telephones) – Sound Æ oscillating pressure waves Æ oscillating [diaphragm + coil] Æ oscillating magnetic flux Æ oscillating induced emf Æ oscillating current in wire Question: Do dynamic microphones need a battery? More Applications of Magnetic Induction • Tape / Hard Drive / ZIP Readout – Tiny coil responds to change in flux as the magnetic domains (encoding 0’s or 1’s) go by. 2007 Nobel Prize!!!!!!!! Giant Magnetoresistance • Credit Card Reader – Must swipe card Æ generates changing flux – Faster swipe Æ bigger signal More Applications of Magnetic Induction • Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) Trains – Induced surface (“eddy”) currents produce field in opposite direction Æ Repels magnet Æ Levitates train S N rails “eddy” current – Maglev trains today can travel up to 310 mph Æ Twice the speed of Amtrak’s fastest conventional train! – May eventually use superconducting loops to produce B-field Æ No power dissipation in resistance of wires! Faraday’s Law of Induction r r Recall the definition of magnetic flux is ΦB =B∫ ⋅ d A Faraday’s Law is the induced EMF in a closed loop equal the negative of the time derivative of magnetic flux change in the loop, d r r dΦ ε= −B∫ d ⋅= A − B dt dt Constant B field, changing B field, no induced EMF causes induced EMF in loop in loop Getting the sign EMF in Faraday’s Law of Induction Define the loop and an area vector, A, who magnitude is the Area and whose direction normal to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUITS I [Written by Suzanne Amador Kane; Modified Slightly for Our Purposes.] Readings: Serway, Chapters 27–28
    DIRECT CURRENT CIRCUITS I [Written by Suzanne Amador Kane; Modified slightly for our purposes.] Readings: Serway, Chapters 27–28. At long last we are ready to begin work with Direct Current (DC) Circuits. DC circuits are those in which the voltages and currents are constant, or time-independent. Time-dependent circuits in which the current oscillates periodically are referred to as Alternating Current (AC) circuits. We will study AC circuits soon enough. As you know, charge is the fundamental unit of electricity much as mass is the fundamental unit of gravitation. A significant difference is that mass is always positive (as far as we know), while charge can be either positive or negative. When charges flow, they form a current, just as when mass moves it has momentum. If we drop a mass, it "flows" down to a lower potential, and a potential difference in an electric circuit drives a current to the lower potential from the higher potential. Since charges come in both positive and negative flavors, electrical potential drives some charges up while others flow down. By analogy, if there were negative mass, it would fall up. When a ball is dropped into a liquid, it falls more slowly due to the resistance of the liquid. Likewise, in a circuit we insert a "resistor" which impedes the flow of current. In a circuit, the effect is to lower the rate at which charge moves, effectively lowering the current which flows through the circuit. It is useful to note here that if we did not have a resistor, in effect it would be like dropping a huge object onto the Earth without air resistance – look at the craters on the Moon to see how undesirable this would be! In circuits, this is called a "short circuit" and it quickly drains the potential while also risking serious damage to the components (and the experimenter).
    [Show full text]
  • DC Power Production, Delivery and Utilization
    DDCC PPowerower PProduction,roduction, DDeliveryelivery aandnd UUtilizationtilization An EPRI White Paper June 2006 AAnn EEPRIPRI WWhitehite PPaperaper DC Power Production, Delivery and Utilization This paper was prepared by Karen George of EPRI Solutions, Inc., based on technical material from: Arshad Mansoor, Vice President, EPRI Solutions Clark Gellings, Vice President—Innovation, EPRI Dan Rastler, Tech Leader, Distributed Resources, EPRI Don Von Dollen, Program Director, IntelliGrid, EPRI AAcknowledgementscknowledgements We would like to thank reviewers and contributors: Phil Barker, Principal Engineer, Nova Energy Specialists David Geary, Vice President, of Engineering, Baldwin Technologies, Inc. Haresh Kamath, EPRI Solutions Tom Key, Principal Technical Manager, EPRI Annabelle Pratt, Power Architect, Intel Corporation Mark Robinson, Vice President, Nextek Power Copyright ©2006 Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA USA June 2006 Page 2 AAnn EEPRIPRI WWhitehite PPaperaper DC Power Production, Delivery and Utilization Edison Redux: The New AC/DC Debate Thomas Edison’s nineteenth-century electric distribution sys- Several converging factors have spurred the recent interest in tem relied on direct current (DC) power generation, delivery, DC power delivery. One of the most important is that an in- and use. This pioneering system, however, turned out to be im- creasing number of microprocessor-based electronic devices practical and uneconomical, largely because in the 19th cen- use DC power internally, converted inside the device from tury, DC power generation was limited to a relatively low volt- standard AC supply. Another factor is that new distributed re- age potential and DC power could not be transmitted beyond sources such as solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays and fuel cells a mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Coil Gun – Design and Construction
    Bohumil SKALA Vladimir KINDL ELECTROMAGNETIC COIL GUN – DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ABSTRACT A single-stage, sensor less, coil gun was designed to demonstrate the capability to accelerate a ferromagnetic projectile to high velocity. This paper summarize all important steps during coil gun design, such as physical laws of the coil gun, preliminary calculations, the testing device and final product. The electromagnetic FEA model of the capacitor-driven inductance coil gun was constructed to be able to optimize the coil's dimensions. The driving circuit was implemented as dynamic model for simulation of current. The coil gun is designed for an exhibition centre as an exhibit. It is not designed for a really shooting applications, this means the projectile is accelerated at relatively low speed. Keywords: Coil gun, electronics, FEM, electromagnetic force 1. INTRODUCTION Electromagnetic accelerating systems are usually constructed as rail guns [3] or coil guns [1]. The rail gun is conceptually more simple than the coil gun, but has some inherent problems with plasma [2] during the projectile launches. That is why this conception is not use here. On the other hand the coil gun is much more suitable for common applications even if it needs some additional supporting facilities [4] such as energy accumulator, switcher and driver. Its main advantage lies in loose of almost all negative phenomena damaging the launch device. Doc. Ing. Bohumil SKALA, Ph.D. e-mail: [email protected] Ing. Vladimir KINDL, Ph.D. e-mail: [email protected] Dept. of Electromechanics and Power Electronics, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Univerzitní 8, 306 14 Pilsen, CZ PROCEEDINGS OF ELECTROTECHNICAL INSTITUTE, Issue 263, 2013 116 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Coil Gun Launcher System
    ISSN(Online): 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (A High Impact Factor, Monthly, Peer Reviewed Journal) Visit: www.ijirset.com Vol. 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Electromagnetic Coil Gun Launcher System Prof. Yogesh Fatangde1 Swapnil Biradar2, Aniket Bahmne3, Suraj Yadav4, Ajay Yadav5 Department of Mechanical Engineering, RMD Sinhgad Technical Campus, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India1 ABSTRACT: In our present time, a study was undertaken to determine if ground based electromagnetic acceleration system could provide a useful reduction in launching cost with current large chemical boosters, while increasing launch safety and reliability. An electromagnetic launcher (EML) system accelerates and launches a projectile by converting electric energy into kinetic energy. An EML system launches projectile by converting electric energy into kinetic energy. There are two types of EML system under development: rail gun and coil gun. A coil gun launches the projectile by magnetic force of electromagnetic coil. A higher velocity needs multiple stages of system, which make coil gun EML system longer. As a result installation cost is very high and it required large installation site for EML. So, we present coil gun EML system with new structure and arrangement for multiple electromagnetic coils to reduce the length of system KEYWORDS: EML, coil gun, Electromagnetic launcher, suck back effect I. INTRODUCTION In chemical launcher systems such as firearms and satellite launchers, chemical explosive energy is converted into mechanical dynamic energy. The system must be redesigned and remanufactured if the target velocity of the projectile is changed. In addition, such systems are not eco-friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 Electric Current and Direct-Current Circuits
    Chapter 21 Electric Current and Direct-Current Circuits 21.1 Electric Current 21.2 Resistance and Ohm’s Law 21.3 Energy and Power in Electric Circuits 21.4 Resisters in Series and Parallel 21.5 Circuits Containing Capacitors Chapter 21 What is electricity? What is electric current? Why does it flow when we flick a switch? Why do bulbs glow when current is supplied. Why do the wires not glow? A battery Figure 21–1 Water flow as analogy for electric current Water can flow quite freely through a garden hose, but if both ends are at the same level (a) there is no flow. If the ends are held at different levels (b), the water flows from the region where the gravitational potential energy is high to the region where it is low. Figure 21–2 The flashlight: A simple electrical circuit (a) A simple flashlight, consisting of a battery, a switch, and a light bulb. (b) When the switch is in the open position the circuit is “broken,” and no charge can flow. When the switch is closed electrons flow through the circuit, and the light glows. Figure 21–3 A mechanical analog to the flashlight circuit The person lifting the water corresponds to the battery in Figure 21–2, and the paddle wheel corresponds to the light bulb. Electromotive force (emf) ∆qV=qEd + - + - + - Think of a battery as a pair of plates that are continually charged up. For a charge to go from one plate to the other it will give up energy = ∆qV. Figure 21–4 Direction of current and electron flow In the flashlight circuit, electrons flow from the negative terminal of the battery to the positive terminal.
    [Show full text]