Research Article - doi: 10.3832/ifor1199-008 ©iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry

of great help in quantifying biological diver- Concordance between vascular plant and sity for less well-known groups and less easily detectable taxa (Pharo et al. 1999, macrofungal community composition in Schmit et al. 2005, Öster 2008, Qian & Ricklefs 2008). Moreover, the possibility of broadleaf deciduous forests in central Italy high congruence between different taxa, which is extremely interesting from an eco- logical viewpoint, can reduce the time and (1-2) (2) (2) (2) Marco Landi , Elena Salerni , Elia Ambrosio , Maria D’Aguanno , costs necessary for planning conservation ac- Alessia Nucci (2), Carlo Saveri (1), Claudia Perini (2), Claudia Angiolini (2) tions, although no single biotic group shows a perfect match with any other. The “taxon surrogacy” hypothesis (Ryti 1992) is based We examined the concordance between vascular plants and macrofungi on the assumption of concordance among (grouped into trophic groups) in Mediterranean forest habitats (central Italy). species richness or patterns of community Our goal was to test how consistently plant and fungi groups classify plots in a composition across different taxonomic broadleaf deciduous forest dominated by Quercus cerris. Our hypothesis was groups (Virolainen et al. 2000, Su et al. that groups of plants can be used as surrogates for the classification of macro- 2004). Nevertheless, the selection of surro- fungal communities. The test of concordance comprised two steps: (1) the gate taxonomic groups is not straightfor- plant species data sets were subjected to cluster analysis, to obtain three clas- ward, and different methods have been ap- sifications based on presence of all plants, presence and frequency of only plied by various authors. In fact, over the woody species; (2) Multiple Response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) was used last 20 years, conservation biologists have to test the performance of each plant classification applied to the fungi data discussed the use of surrogate species in sets. Sample scores on the first PCA axis were used to investigate the relation- conservation planning at great length, deba- ships between compositional patterns. In the concordance analysis, the classifi- ting both the advantages and disadvantages cation based on woody plants only provided better results than the classifica- of this approach (Murphy et al. 2011). There tion obtained using both herbaceous and woody plants. Cross-tests gave the are several different types of surrogacy (Ma- best results when the “woody plants” classification was applied to ectomycor- gurran 2004), such as: (i) cross-taxon, where rhizal fungi (EMF) and, to a certain extent, to humicolous saprotrophs (Sh). high species richness in one taxon is used to The ordination analysis suggested that the frequency of woody plants follows a infer high species richness in others (Mortiz similar spatial distribution to EMF and Sh fungal groups and is therefore ex- et al. 2001); (ii) within-taxon, where generic pected to covariate along the same environmental gradients. Many EMF exhibit or familial richness is treated as a surrogate preferences for few (one or two) hosts. Significant associations were found of species richness (Balmford et al. 1996); among numerous EMF and woody plant species. Woody plants such as Sorbus and (iii) environmental, where parameters domestica and Prunus spinosa appear to be associated with many EMF. The such as temperature or topographical diver- combination of a high frequency of Fraxinus oxycarpa and Quercus petraea sity are assumed to reflect species richness seems to promote distinct assemblages of EMF and Sh fungi. Characteristic as- (Magurran 2004). Another approach is based semblages of fungi were found in association with certain tree and shrub com- on “community concordance” and describes binations. the degree to which patterns in community structure in a set of sites are similar in two Keywords: Deciduous Oaks, Ectomycorrhizal Fungi, Host Specificity, Sapro- different taxonomic groups (Paszkowski & trophic Fungi, Surrogates, Trophic Groups Tonn 2000). This method has been applied rarely, and mainly in aquatic ecosystems (Paszkowski & Tonn 2000, Paavola et al. Introduction on natural ecosystems has brought with it an 2003, Heino & Mykrä 2006, Landi et al. Finding strategies to identify the state of urgent need for the development of simple, 2012). biodiversity and to develop appropriate con- quick and cost-effective methodologies for According to various authors, vascular flo- servation and monitoring programs is one of quantifying and monitoring changes in bio- ra has a great potential to determine the di- the most important issues in the field of eco- logical diversity (Berglund & Jonsson 2001, versity of other groups because it constitutes logy (Gaston 2000, Berglund & Jonsson Heino & Mykrä 2006, Santi et al. 2010). the bulk of total biomass and provides physi- 2001, Similä et al. 2006). The growing im- Surrogate species, whose primary purpose cal structure for other ecosystem components pact of human activities that contribute to is to ascertain and test which groups of orga- (fauna and ecological processes) through the habitat fragmentation and decrease diversity nisms reflect the diversity of others, can be establishment of vegetation (Ryti 1992, Young 2000, Öster 2008). In addition, a (1) Ufficio Territoriale per la Biodiversità di Siena, Corpo Forestale dello Stato, v. Cassia long tradition and much experience has been Nord 7, I-53100 Siena (Italy); (2) Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, v. P.A. gained in the sampling of vascular plants, Mattioli 4, I-53100 Siena (Italy) relatively easy to perform, and plant taxono- my is sufficiently well described and stan- @ Claudia Perini ([email protected]) dardized as well (Sætersdal et al. 2003, Chiarucci et al. 2005, Schmit et al. 2005). Received: Dec 10, 2013 - Accepted: May 15, 2014 Because fungi are heterotrophic organisms Citation: Landi M, Salerni E, Ambrosio E, D’Aguanno M, Nucci A, Saveri C, Perini C, Angiolini mainly dependent on vascular plants, the C, 2014. Concordance between vascular plant and macrofungal community composition in existence of a relationship between the com- broadleaf deciduous forests in central Italy. iForest (early view): e1-e8 [online 2014-08-22] position of plant and fungal communities has URL: http://www.sisef.it/iforest/contents/?id=ifor1199-008 been hypothesized (Chiarucci et al. 2005). Coherently, consistent correlations have Communicated by: Alberto Santini

© SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ e1 iForest (early view): e1-e8 Landi M et al. - iForest (early view): e1-e8 been found between macrofungi and patterns Palazzo (43° 20′ N, 11° 04′ E) and Cornoc- absence and frequency of the following tro- of vascular plants (Brussaard et al. 2001, chia (43° 23′ N, 11° 10′ E). The reserves co- phic groups: (i) EMF, ectomycorrhizal fungi; Packham et al. 2002). However, among the ver about 800 ha of meadows and pastures (ii) Sh, humicolous saprotrophs; (iii) Sl, lit- taxa investigated macrofungi are generally on hillsides, with a slope of about 15-25 de- ter saprotrophs; (iv) Sw, lignicolous sapro- overlooked and rarely considered in reserve grees and elevation from 330 to 530 m a.s.l. trophs; and (v) P, parasites. Coprophilous planning because of their small size, their The two areas are similar in terms of bedrock saprotrophs were absent. The above appro- ephemeral fruit bodies, their difficult identi- (limestone, sandstone and siltstone), near- ach was adopted because many macrofungi fication, and the paucity of expertise con- neutral soils, and forest type, composition are related to woody plant species by their cerning their and ecology (Hawks- and density. No logging or harvesting have trophic requirements and trophic groups may worth 1991, Chiarucci et al. 2005, McMul- been carried out in either reserve in the last be strongly shaped by forest composition lan-Fisher et al. 2009). Nevertheless, their 40 years. The climate is Mediterranean and and structure (e.g., mycorrhizal species and inclusion in conservation planning and ma- characterized by a dry summer and rain in many saprotrophic fungi - Roberts et al. nagement is important because of their vital spring and autumn; the hottest months are 2004, De Bellis et al. 2006, Santos-Silva et functional roles in ecosystems (Lodge et al. July-August and the coldest January-Februa- al. 2011). 2004, Öster 2008, McMullan-Fisher et al. ry. The mean annual precipitation is approxi- Sampling of plant species was carried out 2009) and their great richness estimated mately 800 mm and the mean annual tempe- in June and July 2010, when leaves were worldwide (Hawksworth 2001). However, rature is 13.5 °C at the nearest meteorologi- fully extended. Sampling of macrofungi was while at large spatial scales communities cal station (Pentolina), situated 450 m a.s.l. conducted from April 2009 to November with high tree-species richness have been (ARSIA data for the period 1992-2006). 2011, with a higher frequency (up to once a found to have correspondingly high macro- Such sites provide a good location to study month) from September to December, when fungal species richness (Schmit et al. 2005), the relationships between fungal and plant conditions were generally optimal for fungal low correlations have been found at local communities since mushroom gathering and fruiting. Nomenclature of plant species was scales (e.g., Virolainen et al. 2000, Sætersdal timber extraction are not permitted. In addi- given according to Conti et al. (2005). Fun- et al. 2003, Similä et al. 2006, Santi et al. tion, they represent fairly well the type of na- gal species nomenclature was based on the 2010). tive forest common in the Mediterranean ba- CABI Bioscience Database of Fungal Names In this investigation we examined the con- sin and notoriously rich in fungi (Onofri et (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/nam cordance between vascular plants (grouped al. 2005, Salerni & Perini 2007). es.asp). as woody plants and all plants) and macro- fungi (grouped into trophic groups) at the lo- Sampling design and recording of Statistical analysis cal scale, within two nature reserves in Me- plants and fungi Data collected from the two study sites diterranean forest habitats. To our knowled- Thirty 100 m2 permanent plots (10×10m, were pooled, since all plots shared similar ge, this is a new approach to specifically test marked by metal stakes in each corner) were features as for forest structure, environmen- the concordance between vascular plant and randomly placed in the deciduous broadleaf tal characteristics and history over the last 40 macrofungi communities in broadleaf deci- forests (fifteen for each reserve). The plots years. Only the EMF (ectomycorrhizal fun- duous forests. Our primary goal was to test were previously identified and mapped gi), Sh (humicolous saprotrophs) and Sw (li- how consistently plant and fungi groups (scale 1:5000) by photo-interpretation, with gnicolous saprotrophs) datasets could be classify plots in broadleaf deciduous forest a buffer zone of about 20 m around each po- used in the analysis, as Sl (litter saprotrophs) ecosystems. We hypothesized that plot grou- lygon to reduce possible edge effects. Data and P (parasites) were only present in a few ping based on plant species can be used as a were collected in each plot for all vascular plots. Accordingly, the analysis was carried surrogate for the classification of macrofun- plants (presence-absence), woody plants and out using three plant data sets and six fungal gal communities. We also investigated the fungal species (presence-absence and fre- data sets (18 combinations), following two association between plant and fungi species quency). As for vascular plants, herbs, seed- main steps. In the first step, a hierarchical for data sets showing a significant concor- lings, shrubs and trees were sampled. Woody cluster analysis using the Bray-Curtis dis- dance, through the analysis of correlation co- species frequency was obtained by counting similarity index (1 − Sørensen’s index) and efficients, to ascertain whether plant commu- the number of individuals per species per flexible beta (β = -0.25) was applied on the nity composition could be used as an “ecolo- plot, including trees or shrubs with DBH > 2 three plant species data sets following the re- gical indicator” for specific groups of fungi. cm or height > 2 m. Macrofungi were identi- commendations of McCune & Grace (2002), This information will improve managers’ fied based on morphology with the help of and three classifications were obtained based ability to plan effectively for the presence of general analytic keys and monographs (Sa- on: (1) presence/absence of all plants; (2) these important macrofungal resources in de- lerni et al. 2010). To quantify their abun- presence/absence of woody species; and (3) ciduous forest ecosystems. dance, their frequency was recorded as the frequency of woody species. number of carpophores (fruiting bodies) > 1 In the second step, Multiple Response Per- Materials and methods mm per species in each plot (Arnolds 1981). mutation Procedures (MRPP) were used to Although above-ground fruiting bodies do test the performance of each classification Study site not necessarily represent the abundance of applied to the fungi data sets. Cluster groups The study was carried out in two nearby fungi, they provide reliable information con- were subjected to a set of cross-tests on the temperate deciduous broadleaf forests cha- cerning forest diversity without excessive ef- macrofungi data sets and a cross-test was racterized by Quercus cerris, widely domi- fort and cost (Tóth & Barta 2010). Each ma- only accepted when significant (p<0.05). nant in the canopy layer, followed by Fraxi- crofungal taxon was attributed to the most Moreover, MRPP for a posteriori classifica- nus ornus and Q. pubescens. The number of likely trophic group, according to Arnolds et tion (self-test) was applied to obtain the trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) > al. (1995) and to personal field observations. “best possible” values of such statistics, for 2 cm ranged from 7 to 33 trees per 100 m2. Three data sets were then obtained for the numerical comparison with the values of the The mean density of trees was 17 ± 7 (SD) plants (presence-absence of all vascular a priori classification (cross-test). MRPP is per 100 m2. plants, presence-absence and frequency of a data-dependent permutation test that com- These sites are located in Tuscany (central woody plants) and ten data sets were obtai- pares dissimilarities within and among Italy), within the State Nature Reserves of ned from the carpophores of fungi (presence- groups, but does not require any assump-

iForest (early view): e1-e8 e2 © SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ Concordance between plant and macrofungal community

Tab. 1 - Results of the cross-test based on Multiple Response Permutation Procedures (MRPP) carried out on classifications of plants ap- plied to trophic groups of fungi. Clusters are reported in columns and fungal groups are displayed in rows. P-values are reported for signifi- cant cross-tests only. Self-tests performed with a posteriori classification to compare A and T values obtained by MRPP are also shown. (n.s.): not significant.

Woody plants All plants Data Type Fungi Presence-absence data Frequency data Presence-absence data A T p A T p A T p Self test - 0.151 -8.972 - 0.261 -14.236 - 0.092 -8.947 - Presence-absence EMF - Ectomycorrhizal 0.020 -2.420 0.016 0.018 -2.164 n.s. 0.014 -1.684 n.s. data Sw - Lignicolous saprotrophs -0.006 0.599 n.s. -0.008 0.850 n.s. -0.006 0.583 n.s. Sh - Humicolous saprotrophs -0.004 0.419 n.s. -0.014 -1.434 n.s. -0.003 0.273 n.s. Frequency data EMF - Ectomycorrhizal 0.019 -3.149 0.005 0.013 -2.274 0.021 0.014 -1.929 0.038 Sw - Lignicolous saprotrophs 0.008 -1.036 n.s. -0.014 1.496 n.s. 0.002 -0.210 n.s. Sh - Humicolous saprotrophs 0.005 -0.621 n.s. 0.017 -2.166 0.037 0.011 -1.446 n.s. tions of multivariate normality and homo- lauer 2003). Ordination analysis was perfor- podium sylvaticum, B. rupestre, Viola alba geneity of variance to test the hypothesis of med using the CANOCO v. 4.5 software pa- and Melica uniflora. no differences among groups of sampling ckage (ter Braak & Šmilauer 2002). The po- units assessed through a Monte Carlo per- tential use of the compositional patterns of Fungal community composition mutation procedure (Zimmerman et al. 1985, vascular plant data sets as surrogates for A total of 333 macrofungal species were Biondini et al. 1988). This consists of the A those of different macrofungal data sets was found in the study plots. The three most re- statistics, which estimates the within-group tested by Spearman’s rank correlation of the presentative trophic groups were: ectomy- homogeneity (higher values indicate a high sample scores along the first PCA axis (a to- corrhizal fungi (EMF) with 157 species and degree of homogeneity), and the T statistics, tal of nine PCAs were extracted). Significant a mean number per plot of 20.6 ± 7.7 (SD); which measures the among-group separabili- (positive or negative) correlation indicates a humicolous saprotrophs (Sh) with 81 species ty (large negative value of T indicates a high concurrent variation in the species composi- and a mean number per plot of 8.3 ± 3.4; and separability of groups). When A=0, the with- tion among taxonomic groups. Furthermore, lignicolous saprotrophs (Sw) with 78 spe- in-group community heterogeneity equals Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used cies, whose mean number per plot was 11.0 that expected by chance, while if A<0 the to assess the association between plant and ± 4.4. Mycena vitilis (Sw) was the most heterogeneity exceeds that expected by chan- fungi species usng the data sets for which common species (present in 93% of plots), ce. The MRPP analysis was performed using significant concordance was found. followed by Cortinarius rigens (EMF), En- the software package PCORD (McCune & toloma rhodopolium and Rhodocollybia bu- Mefford 2011). Results tyracea (Sh). Litter saprotrophs (Sl), with 10 Ordination analysis, formerly applied to in- species, and parasites (P), with 7 species, vestigate the congruence among taxonomic Plant community composition had the lowest mean number of carpophores groups, including fungal species (Sætersdal A total of 108 plant species were found, in- (1.8 and 0.9, respectively) and were not de- et al. 2003, Similä et al. 2006, Santi et al. cluding 18 species of trees and shrubs taller tected in many plots. 2010), was used to evaluate the congruence than 2 m (woody plants). The mean number of species composition between the plant of species per plot was 27 ± 8 (SD) and that Community concordance between and the macrofungal data sets considered. To of woody plants was 4.3 ± 1.7. Concerning plants and fungi investigate the main gradients in the species trees, Quercus cerris was dominant in all The three classifications identified by clus- data for the two taxonomic groups, Detren- plots, with a higher mean number of indivi- ters analysis (see “Materials and Methods”) ded Correspondence Analysis (DCA) was duals (11.2 /100 m2) than other tree species were cut to hierarchical levels (nodes) corre- applied for each group (Hill & Gauch 1980), (such as Fraxinus ornus, Quercus pubescens sponding to three distinct groups, each con- including down-weighting of rare species. and Ulmus minor). Tall shrubs (such as Cor- taining at least 2 plots (from 5 to 19 plots for Principal Component Analysis (PCA), was nus mas, Crataegus monogyna, Juniperus each group). Among the cut levels of classi- then used to analyse the congruence of the communis and Prunus spinosa) and vines fications the percentage of information left data sets because of: (i) the relatively short (Hedera helix and Tamus communis) were had quite similar values (from 10 to 20%). length of the compositional gradients; and also frequent. The most common herbaceous The cross-test concordance analysis carried (ii) their potential use with empty samples, plants were perennials with underground tis- out revealed five significant results out of contrary to unimodal methods (Leps & Smi- sues (rhizomes and bulbs), such as Brachy- eighteen combinations (Tab. 1), and all the

Tab. 2 - Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) between the sample scores on the first PCA axis performed on plant (columns) and fungi (rows) data sets. The variance accounted for by the first axis of each PCA is shown in brackets. (**): p<0.01; (*): p<0.05.

Woody plants All plants Variance Data set Fungi Trophic Group Presence data Frequency data Presence data (%) (60.2) (78.9) (47.4) Presence-absence data EMF - Ectomycorrhizal (31.9) -0.14 0.47** -0.32 Sw - Lignicolous saprotrophs (36.2) -0.06 -0.02 -0.05 Sh - Humicolous saprotrophs (30.9) -0.07 0.38* -0.26 Frequency data EMF - Ectomycorrhizal (25.1) -0.14 0.23 -0.31 Sw - Lignicolous saprotrophs (30.8) 0.04 -0.08 0.09 Sh - Humicolous saprotrophs (51.4) 0.14 -0.45* 0.05

© SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ e3 iForest (early view): e1-e8 Landi M et al. - iForest (early view): e1-e8 three classifications gave the best results sed on frequency data also gave significant The correlations between the sample scores when applied to the fungal data set based on results when applied to the frequency of hu- on the first PCA axis for the different groups frequency (number of fruiting bodies per micolous fungi. On the other hand, the clas- were weak and mostly not statistically signi- species - see MRPP statistics and signifi- sifications based on fungal presence-absence ficant (Tab. 2). The two groups, plants and cance). All the three classifications showed data gave poor results (woody plant presen- fungi, did not follow comparable composi- significant concordance when applied to my- ce/absence data applied to mycorrhizal fun- tional gradients (presence-absence data) as corrhizal fungi. Considering each classifica- gi). Lignicolous fungi gave no significant re- revealed by rather different positions of the tions individually, that of woody plants ba- sults. plots in the PCA scatter-plots (not shown).

Tab. 3 - Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) between woody plants and ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF), based on frequency data. The symbol (+) indicates ρ > 0.50 and p-value <0.01. s a i a a n s s a n i i p y a s l e l a c s u r u r a e i g i r o r l s u i a e t x s t a f r a o t r o o m u s n i s e n a c r r t s l i r n a e t n n e y n e i e m i i a i

o o p e m p c x m

r

b o m p s

p o p

r m s s o y s c m s o r

m u

c s

o s p u u s d s s u Species a c a t s s s u

u r n n c c u c s u u u s u i s n

a c r r e i r u n r g n u c x r a m e u o i u r e i p l e e e y a b u b u r y r x p C c r r r a r Q r u U i t t a a P E Q o o A s P F r n a Q C S S r u O F J C Amanita pantherina - - - - - + ------+ - - Amanita phalloides ------+ - - - - Boletus fechtneri ------+ - - Cortinarius argutus ------+ ------Cortinarius betuletorum ------+ - - Cortinarius bolaris ------+ ------Cortinarius casimiri ------+ ------+ - - - Cortinarius decipiens ------+ ------Cortinarius dionysae ------+ ------Cortinarius rufo-olivaceus ------+ - - Cortinarius trivialis ------+ - - Craterellus cornucopioides ------+ - - - - Genea fragrans ------+ ------Hebeloma gigaspermum - - + ------Hebeloma sinapizans ------+ - - - - - Hygrophorus arbustivus ------+ ------Hygrophorus roseodiscoideus - - - - - + ------+ - - - - cincinnata - - - + ------Inocybe flavella - - - + ------Inocybe glabripes ------+ - - - - ------+ ------Inocybe oblectabilis ------+ ------Inocybe obscurobadia ------+ ------Inocybe praetervisa ------+ ------Lactarius acerrimus + ------Lactarius camphoratus - + ------Lactarius scrobiculatus - - - - + ------+ - - Leccinellum crocipodium ------+ - - Otidea alutacea ------+ - - Russula atropurpurea ------+ - - Russula aurea ------+ - - Russula chloroides - + ------Russula curtipes ------+ - Russula cyanoxantha ------+ - - - - Russula delica - + ------+ ------Russula grata - + ------Russula maculata - - - - - + ------Russula pectinatoides - - - - + ------+ - - Russula pseudointegra ------+ ------Russula rubra - + ------+ ------Russula rutila ------+ Thelephora anthocephala ------+ ------Tricholoma columbetta ------+ - Tricholoma orirubens ------+ ------Tricholoma ustaloides - - - - - + ------Tuber excavatum ------+ ------iForest (early view): e1-e8 e4 © SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ Concordance between plant and macrofungal community

Tab. 4 - Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) between woody plants and humicolous saprotrophs (Sh), based on frequency data. The symbol (+) indicates ρ > 0.50 and p-value <0.01. s i s a a s s n a i n i p a l e l a c u r e u r a e i r o l s a i e c t x t a f a t r o m u s s i s e n c r t s l i a e e t n e n y i e m i a i

e p b p x m r b o m p s p p o

u r o y s

c o r m u

s c

p o s p d s Species s a c a t s s

u

u s r c c s u u u s

s n

a c e u i r u n r n r u c a u c i u r i e p e e y b u b r r y r x p c r r r Q r u e i t a a P E o o A s P u r n Q C S S u O F Q J Agaricus fuscofibrillosus ------+ - Clathrus ruber - - - - + - + ------Clavariadelphus pistillaris - - - + - - - - - + - - - Entoloma hirtipes - - + ------Entoloma rhodopolium ------+ - - Galerina graminea ------+ - Gymnopus dryophilus ------+ - - - - - Hygrocybe ceracea - + ------Hygrocybe conica ------+ - - - - Lepiota lilacea - + - - - + ------Lepiota subincarnata ------+ Macrolepiota procera ------+ - Macrotyphula juncea ------+ - Mycena epipterygia - - - + - - - - - + - - - Mycetinis alliaceus ------+ - - - - - Pluteus ephebeus ------+ - Psathyrella obtusata + ------Psathyrella tephrophylla + - - - - + ------Scutellinia armatospora - - - - - + ------

The correlations between woody plants (fre- that broadleaved deciduous forests domi- thus affecting the composition of the Sh fun- quency data) and EMF (presence/absence nated by Quercus cerris support a high fun- gal community. Moreover, it is possible that data) and Sh (presence/absence and frequen- gal richness. the species classified as Sh have expanded cy data) fungi were significant. According to observations from previous their trophism (Whitfield 2007). studies (Paavola et al. 2003, Landi et al. The ordination analysis applied in this Associations between plants and 2012), each plant data set gave a better value study revealed that the scores on the ordina- mycorrhizal fungi of MRPP statistics under a posteriori classi- tion axes for woody species were signifi- Results of the correlation analysis between fication (self-test) than under a priori classi- cantly correlated with those obtained for woody and fungi species (EMF and Sh) fication (cross-test). EMF and Sh species, clearly indicating a based on frequency data are reported in Tab. Considering the a priori classification, bet- spatial covariation of EMF and Sh fungal 3 and Tab. 4. Overall, a significant positive ter results were obtained in the MRPP analy- groups and woody species along the same association was detected between 46 EMF sis when the classification based only on environmental gradients. and 17 woody plants, including tree and woody species was used, in comparison with Concerning the association between com- shrub species (Tab. 3). Sorbus domestica the classification obtained including both munities of woody plants and fungi, it is and Prunus spinosa were correlated with a herbaceous and woody species. Such result well known that many EMF show a degree greater number of EMF (11 and 8 correla- may be interpreted as due to the fact that of host specificity (Molina et al. 1992, Tyler tions, respectively) than any other plants. herbaceous species are not functionally rele- 1992, Whitfield 2007). Moreover, multiva- The genus Russula includes the largest num- vant to EMF species, therefore their inclu- riate statistics have shown that macrofungal ber of EMF species correlated with woody sion in the analysis provides a lower varian- communities can be clearly defined and de- plants; all species of the genus Russula ce accounted for in the data sets analyzed. lineated from the abundance patterns of their found in this study were included in Tab. 3. The concordance between the woody species host tree species in temperate forests (Hum- Concerning Sh fungi, significant positive as- community with the EMF community found phrey et al. 2000, Ferris et al. 2000, Buée et sociation were found between 19 Sh fungi in this investigation agrees with previous al. 2011, O’Hanlon & Harrington 2012). In and 13 woody plants (Tab. 4). Tree species studies demonstrating that the EMF commu- this study, EMF were associated with woody as Fraxinus oxycarpa and Quercus petraea nity composition is mainly related to tree plants, including not only trees but also aged were associated exclusively to the same and shrub species (Kernaghan et al. 2003, shrubs (taller than 2m). assembly of EMF (Cortinarius casimiri and Cripps 2004, Lodge et al. 2004, De Bellis et In Italy, the intensive exploitation occurred Hygrophorus roseodiscoideus) and Sh fungi al. 2006, Kirk et al. 2008). A similar concor- in the past has deeply modified the forest (Clavariadelphus pistillaris and Mycena dance was also found between the woody composition and structure, affecting in par- epipterygia). species and the Sh fungi communities, but ticular the understorey layer that was re- only when both data sets were based on fre- moved to ensure optimal growing conditions Discussion quency. Analogously, this may be interpre- to trees. On the other hand, the results of this The high number of fungal species found ted as an effect of the chemical composition study suggest that the presence of old shrubs in this investigation confirmed the evidence of the litter that varies among different plant in the understorey have an overriding influ- previously reported by Salerni et al. (2001) communities (Berg & McClaugherty 2007), ence on EMF communities in broadleaf de-

© SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ e5 iForest (early view): e1-e8 Landi M et al. - iForest (early view): e1-e8 ciduous forests dominated by Quercus cer- retaining different structures in broadleaf de- 4: 22-31. - doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2010.07.003 ris. Indeed, it may be hypothesized that the ciduous forests of the Mediterranean area. Chevalier G, Desmas C, Frochot H, Riousset L presence of a shrub understorey can be used To test the general applicability of the rela- (1978). L’espèce Tuber aestivum Vitt. II. Ecolo- as an “ecological indicator” for EMF, which tionships found in this study, and to predict gie [The species Tuber aestivum Vitt. II. Eco- seem to prefer mature forests (e.g., genus the fungal communities based on the woody logy]. Mushroom Science 10 (1): 977-993. [in Russula - Mason et al. 1982, Dighton et al. species communities in Mediterranean de- French] 1986, Deacon & Fleming 1992). ciduous forests, further investigations are Chiarucci A, D’Auria F, De Dominicis V, Laganà Our data indicates that many EMF exhibit needed including more replications over a A, Perini C, Salerni E (2005). Using vascular preferences for one or two hosts. However, broader range of sites. plants as a surrogate taxon to maximize fungal some woody plants, such as Sorbus dome- species richness in reserve design. Conservation stica and Prunus spinosa, appear to be asso- Acknowledgements Biology 19: 1644-1652. - doi: 10.1111/j.1523- ciated with many EMF. To our knowledge, This work was partly supported by a Mana- 1739.2005.00202.x these species are not thought to host sym- gement Project of the Italian Forest Service Conti F, Abbate G, Alessandrini A, Blasi C biotic fungi, though it has been hypothesized (Corpo Forestale dello Stato). We thank all (2005). An annotated checklist of the Italian vas- that they play an important role during the our colleagues who participated in the sam- cular flora. Palombi Editore, Rome, Italy, pp. fruiting process of some fungal species pling efforts, particularly Pamela Leonardi, 420. (Chevalier et al. 1978, Bencivenga et al. Flavio Frignani, Martino Danielli and Lo- Cripps CL (2004). Fungi in forest ecosystems: 1990). McDonald et al. (2010) identified ec- renzo Pecoraro, also for their precious help systematics, diversity and ecology. The New tomycorrhizal species of the genera Cortina- with plant and fungal determination, and York Botanical Garden, New York, USA, pp. rius, Inocybe and Tricholoma that form epi- Emma Thorley for language editing. 363. geous fruiting bodies with a species of Deacon JW, Fleming LV (1992). Interactions of Rosaceae. On the other hand, compared to References ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: “Mycorrhizal Func- other higher taxa of the northern hemisphere Arnolds E (1981). Ecology and coenology of tioning, an Integrative Plant-Fungal Process” (e.g., Pinaceae and Fagales), only a few stu- macrofungi in grasslands and moist heathlands (Allen MF ed). Chapman and Hall, New York, dies have investigated the ectomycorrhizal in Drenthe, the Netherlands. Part 1. Introduction USA, pp. 249-300. fungi on Rosaceae (Dickie & Moyersoen and Synecology. Bibliotheca Mycologica 83: 1- De Bellis T, Kernaghan G, Bradley R, Widden P 2008). 410. (2006). Relationships between stand composi- Our results also showed that the co-occur- Arnolds E, Kuyper TW, Noordeloos ME (1995). tion and ectomycorrhizal community structure in rence of Fraxinus oxycarpa and Quercus pe- Overzicht van de paddestoelen in Nederland boreal mixed-wood forests. Microbial Ecology traea, both associated with peculiar ecologi- [Overview of mushrooms in Netherlands]. Ned- 52: 114-126. - doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9038-8 cal conditions (Temunović et al. 2012, San- erlandse Mycologische Vereniging, Wijster, The Dickie IA, Moyersoen B (2008). Towards a global ders et al. 2014) seems to promote distinct Netherlands, pp. 872. [in Dutch] view of ectomycorrhizal ecology. New Phytolo- assemblages of EMF and Sh fungi, as com- Balmford A, Jayasuriya AH, Green MJB (1996). gist 180: 263-265. - doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137. pared with other woody species. As a conse- Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for 2008.02635.x quence, strategies for the conservation of species richness. 2. Local applications. Procee- Dighton J, Poskitt JM, Howard DM (1986). fungi should aim at retaining diverse assem- dings of the Royal Society B 263: 1571-1575. - Changes in occurrence of basidiomycete fruit bo- blages of host species and different struc- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0230 dies during forest stand development with spe- tures across forests. Bencivenga M, Calandra R, Giovanotti E, Russi L cific reference to mycorrhizal species. Transac- In this study, few Sh fungal species were (1990). Aspetti pedologici e vegetazionali delle tions of the British Mycological Society 87: 163- significantly associated with woody plants. tartufaie di alcune specie di “tartufi minori” [Soil 171. - doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80017-1 This may be due to the fact that Sh species and vegetation aspects of truffle grounds for so- Ferris R, Peace AJ, Newton AC (2000). Macro- are more dependent on the whole community me species of “minor truffles”]. Annali della Fa- fungal communities of lowland Scots pine (Pi- (and its soil niches) than to individual trees. coltà di Agraria 50: 7-45. [in Italian] nus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea In any case, abiotic factors (e.g., soil nutri- Berg B, McClaugherty C (2007). Plant litter: de- abies (L.) Karsten.) plantations in England: rela- ents and microclimate - Twieg et al. 2009, composition, humus formation, carbon seques- tionships with site factors and stand structure. Santos-Silva et al. 2011) may also play an tration (2nd edn). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Forest Ecology and Management 131: 255-267. - important role in the distribution of such Berlin, Germany, pp. 338. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00218-2 fungal trophic groups, and then the host Berglund H, Jonsson BG (2001). Predictability of Gaston KJ (2000). Global patterns in biodiversity. specificity of macrofungi observed on a local plant and fungal species richness of old-growth Nature 405: 220-227. - doi: 10.1038/35012228 scale can be different at a regional scale. boreal forest islands. Journal of Vegetation Sci- Hawksworth DL (1991). The fungal dimension of ence 12: 857-866. - doi: 10.2307/3236874 biodiversity: magnitude, significance and conser- Conclusions Biondini ME, Mielke PW, Berry KJ (1988). Data- vation. Mycological Research 95: 641-655. - doi: The results of our investigation support the dependent permutation techniques for the analy- 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80810-1 evidence of woody plant communities as a sis of ecological data. Vegetatio 75: 161-168. Hawksworth DL (2001). The magnitude of fungal useful indicator of the community of EMF. [online] URL: http://link.springer.com/article/ diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate re- As a consequence of fungal host preferences, 10.1007/BF00045630 vised. Mycological Research 105: 1422-1432. - characteristic assemblages of EMF can be Brussaard L, Kuyper TW, De Goede RGM (2001). doi: 10.1017/S0953756201004725 found in association with different tree and On the relationships between nematodes, mycor- Heino J, Mykrä H (2006). Assessing physical sur- shrub species combinations. rhizal fungi and plants: functional composition rogates for biodiversity: do tributary and stream Intensive silvicultural practices may dra- of species and plant performance. Plant and Soil type classifications reflect macroinvertebrate as- matically change the composition and struc- 232: 155-165. - doi: 10.1023/A:1010398322637 semblage diversity in running waters? Biological ture of woody species, affecting therefore Buée M, Maurice JP, Zeller B, Andrianarisoa S, Conservation 129: 418-426. - doi: 10.1016/j.bio- their potential for colonization by host-spe- Ranger J, Courtecuisse R, Marçais B, Le Tacon con.2005.11.009 cific symbionts. Consequently, strategies for F (2011). Influence of tree species on richness Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980). Detrended correspon- the conservation of fungi should aim at in- and diversity of epigeous fungal communities in dence analysis, an improved ordination techni- creasing the biodiversity of host species and a French temperate forest stand. Fungal Ecology que. Vegetatio 42: 47-58. - doi: 10.1007/BF0004

iForest (early view): e1-e8 e6 © SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ Concordance between plant and macrofungal community

8870 10.1098/rspb.2001.1713 Salerni E, Laganà A, De Dominicis V (2001). My- Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ, Holden E Murphy DD, Weiland PS, Cummins KW (2011). cocoenological studies in deciduous oak woods (2000). The importance of plantations in A critical assessment of the use of surrogate of central-southern Tuscany (Italy). Cryptogamie northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. species in conservation planning in the Sacra- Mycologie 22: 35-55. - doi: 10.1016/S0181- Biological Conservation 96: 241-252. - doi: mento-San Joaquin Delta, California (USA). 1584(01)01054-5 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00077-X Conservation Biology 25: 873-878. - doi: Salerni E, Perini C (2007). Mycodiversity of natu- Kernaghan G, Widden P, Bergeron Y, Légaré S, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01711.x re reserves in central Italy. Acta Mycologica 42: Paré D (2003). Biotic and abiotic factors affec- O’Hanlon R, Harrington TJ (2012). Macrofungal 5-19. - doi: 10.5586/am.2007.001 ting ectomycorrhizal diversity in boreal mixed- diversity and ecology in four Irish forest types. Salerni E, Baglioni F, Mazzei T, Gardin L, Cia- woods. Oikos 102: 497-504. - doi: 10.1034/ Fungal Ecology 5: 499-508. - doi: 10.1016/j.fu- batti F, Leonardi P, Vesprini J, Perini C (2010). j.1600-0706.2003.12415.x neco.2011.12.008 Efectos de las diversas técnicas culturales sobre Kirk P, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA Onofri S, Bernicchia A, Filipello Marchisio V, la producción de Tuber aestivum Vitt. y de Tu- (2008). Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Padovan F, Perini C, Ripa C, Salerni E, Savino ber melanosporum Vitt. en dos plantaciones ex- Fungi (10th edn). CAB International, Walling- E, Venturella G, Vizzini A, Zotti M, Zucconi L perimentales en Italia central [Effects of different ford, UK, pp. 771. (2005). Checklist dei funghi italiani Basidio- cultural techniques on the production of Tuber Landi M, Piazzini S, Nucci A, Saveri C, Angiolini mycetes [Checklist of Italian fungi Basidiomy- aestivum Vitt. and Tuber melanosporum Vitt. in C (2012). Can macrophytes be a surrogate for cota]. Carlo Delfino Editore, Sassari, Italy, pp. two experimental plantations in central Italy]. amphibians and physico-chemical features in 380. ZIZAK 7: 47-62. [in Spanish] pond classifications? Aquatic Botany 101: 1-7. - Öster M (2008). Low congruence between the di- Sanders TGM, Pitman R, Broadmeadow MSJ doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.03.003 versity of Waxcap (Hygrocybe spp.) fungi and (2014). Species-specific climate response of oaks Leps J, Smilauer P (2003). Multivariate analysis vascular plants in semi-natural grasslands. Basic (Quercus spp.) under identical environmental of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge and Applied Ecology 9: 514-522. - doi: 10.1016/ conditions. iForest 7: 61-69. - doi: 10.3832/ifor University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 282. j.baae.2007.11.006 0911-007 Lodge DJ, Ammirati JF, O’Dell TE, Mueller GM Paavola R, Muotka T, Virtanen R, Heino J, Kreivi Santi E, Maccherini S, Rocchini D, Bonini I, Bru- (2004). Collecting and describing Macrofungi. P (2003). Are biological classifications of head- nialti G, Favilli L, Perini C, Pezzo F, Piazzino S, In: “Biodiversity of Fungi, Inventory and Moni- water streams concordant across multiple taxo- Rota E, Salerni E, Chiarucci A (2010). Simple to toring Methods” (Müller GM, Bills GF, Foster nomic groups? Freshwater Biology 48: 1912- sample: vascular plants as surrogate group in a MS eds). Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 1923. - doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01131.x nature reserve. Journal for Nature Conservation pp. 129-158. Packham JM, May TW, Brown MJ, Wardlaw TJ, 18: 2-11. - doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2009.02.003 Magurran AE (2004). Measuring biological diver- Mills AK (2002). Macrofungal diversity and Santos-Silva C, Gonçalves A, Louro R (2011). sity. Blackwell Publishing company, Oxford, community ecology in mature and regrowth wet Canopy cover influence on macrofungal richness UK, pp. 256. eucalypt forest in Tasmania: a multivariate stu- and sporocarp production in montado ecosys- Mason PA, Last FT, Pelham J, Ingleby K (1982). dy. Austral Ecology 27: 148-161. - doi: 10.1046/ tems. Agroforestry Systems 82: 149-159. - doi: Ecology of some fungi associated with an ageing j.1442-9993.2002.01167.x 10.1007/s10457-011-9374-7 stand of birches (Betula pendula and Betula Paszkowski CA, Tonn WA (2000). Community Schmit JP, Mueller GM, Leacock PR, Mata JL, pubescens). Forest Ecology and Management 4: concordance between the fish and aquatic birds Wu QX, Huang YQ (2005). Assessment of tree 19-39. - doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(82)90026-3 of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative species richness as a surrogate for macrofungal McCune B, Grace JB (2002). Analysis of ecologi- importance of environmental and biotic factors. species richness. Biological Conservation 121: cal communities. MJM Software Design, Glene- Freshwater Biology 43: 421-437. - doi: 10.1046/ 99-100. - doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.013 den Beach, OR, USA, pp. 300. j.1365-2427.2000.00512.x Similä M, Kouki J, Mönkkönen M, Sippola AL, McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011). PC-ORD: multi- Pharo EJ, Beattie AJ, Binns D (1999). Vascular Huhta E (2006). Co-variation and indicators of variate analysis of ecological data (v. 6.0). MJM plant diversity as a surrogate for bryophyte and species diversity: can richness of forest-dwelling Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA, lichen diversity. Conservation Biology 13: 282- species be predicted in northern boreal forests? pp. 28. 292. - doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002 Ecological Indicators 6: 686-700. - doi: 10.1016/ McDonald KR, Pennell J, Frank JL, Southworth D 282.x j.ecolind.2005.08.028 (2010). of Cercocarpus ledi- Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2008). Global concordance Su JC, Debinski DM, Jakubauskas ME, Kindscher folius (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terres- K (2004). Beyond species richness: Community 97: 1867-1872. - doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900357 trial vertebrates. Ecology Letters 11: 547-553. - similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruen- McMullan-Fisher SJM, Kirkpatrick JB, May TW, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01168.x ce for coarse-filter conservation. Conservation Pharo EJ (2009). Surrogates for macrofungi and Roberts C, Ceska O, Kroeger P, Kendrick B Biology 18: 167-173. - doi: 10.1111/j.1523-17 mosses in reservation planning. Conservation (2004). Macrofungi from six habitats over five 39.2004.00337.x Biology 24: 730-736. - doi: 10.1111/j.1523-17 years in Clayoquot Sound, Vancouver Island. Temunović M, Franjić J, Satovic Z, Grgurev M, 39.2009.01378.x Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1518-1538. - Frascaria-Lacoste N, Fernández-Manjarrés JF Molina RJ, Massicotte H, Trappe JM (1992). doi: 10.1139/b04-114 (2012). Environmental heterogeneity explains Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbio- Ryti RT (1992). Effect of the focal taxon on the the genetic structure of Continental and Mediter- ses: community-ecological consequences and selection the nature reserves. Ecological Applica- ranean populations of Fraxinus angustifolia practical implications. In: “Mycorrhizal Functio- tions 2: 404-410. - doi: 10.2307/1941875 Vahl. PLoS ONE 7 (8): e42764. - doi: 10.1371/ ning, an Integrative Plant-fungal Process” (Allen Sætersdal M, Gjerde I, Blom HH, Ihlen PG, journal.pone.0042764 MF ed). Chapman and Hall, New York, USA, Myrseth EW, Pommeresche R, Skartveit J, Sol- ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002). CANOCO re- pp. 357-423. høy T, Aas O (2003). Vascular plants as a surro- ference manual and CanoDraw for Windows Mortiz C, Richardson KS, Ferrier S, Monteith GB, gate species group in complementary site selec- user’s guide: software for canonical community Stanisic J, Williams S, Whiffin T (2001). Bio- tion for bryophytes, macrolichens, spiders, cara- ordination. Microcomputer Power 4.5, Ithaca, geographical concordance and efficiency of ta- bids, staphylinids, snails, and wood living poly- New York, USA, pp. 500. [online] URL: http:// xon indicators for establishing conservation prio- pore fungi in a northern forest. Biological Con- library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/1722500 rity in a tropical rainforest biota. Proceedings of servation 115: 21-31. - doi: 10.1016/S0006- Tóth BB, Barta Z (2010). Ecological studies of ec- the Royal Society B 268: 1875-1881. - doi: 3207(03)00090-9 tomycorrhizal fungi: an analysis of survey me-

© SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/ e7 iForest (early view): e1-e8 Landi M et al. - iForest (early view): e1-e8

thods. Fungal Diversity 45: 3-19. - doi: 10.1007/ rhizal communities in a chronosequence of Use of an improved statistical method for group s13225-010-0052-2 mixed temperate forests. 19: 305- comparisons to study effects of prairie fire. Eco- Tyler G (1992). Tree species affinity of decom- 316. - doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0232-7 logy 66: 606-611. - doi: 10.2307/1940409 poser and ectomycorrhizal macrofungi in Virolainen KM, Ahlroth P, Hyvärinen E, Ko- Whitfield J (2007). Fungal roles in soil ecology: (Fagus sylvatica L.), oak (Quercus robur L.) and rkeamäki E, Mattila J, Päivinen J, Rintala T, underground networking. Nature 449: 136-138. - hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) forests. Forest Suomi T, Suhonen J (2000). Hot spots, indicator doi: 10.1038/449136a Ecology and Management 47: 269-284. - doi: taxa, complementarity and optimal networks of Young TP (2000). Restoration ecology and con- 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90279-I taiga. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267: servation biology. Biological Conservation 92: Twieg BD, Durall DM, Simard SW, Jones MD 1143-1147. - doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1120 73-83. - doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00057-9 (2009). Influence of soil nutrients on ectomycor- Zimmerman GM, Goetz H, Mielke PV (1985).

iForest (early view): e1-e8 e8 © SISEF http://www.sisef.it/iforest/