Arxiv:Nucl-Ex/0311004V2 16 Dec 2003 UNIVERSIT`A DEGLI STUDI DI
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI PADOVA Sede Amministrativa: Universit`adegli Studi di Padova Dipartimento di Fisica “G. Galilei” DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN FISICA CICLO XVI Charm production and in-medium QCD energy loss in nucleus–nucleus collisions with ALICE. A performance study. arXiv:nucl-ex/0311004v2 16 Dec 2003 Coordinatore: Ch.mo Prof. Attilio Stella Supervisore: Ch.mo Prof. Maurizio Morando Dottorando: Andrea Dainese 31 Ottobre 2003 Charm production and in-medium QCD energy loss in nucleus–nucleus collisions with ALICE. A performance study. Andrea Dainese Universit`adegli Studi di Padova October 31st, 2003 Table of Contents Introduction 1 1 Heavy ion physics at the LHC: study of deconfined QCD matter 9 1.1 Phenomenologyofhotanddensematter . 11 1.1.1 TheQCDphasediagram. 11 1.1.2 LatticeQCDresults ..................... 12 1.2 Evidence for deconfinement in heavy ion collisions: the SPS programme 14 1.3 RHIC:focusonnewobservables . 17 1.4 LHC: study of ‘deeply deconfined’ matter . 19 1.4.1 Systems, energies and expected multiplicity . 19 1.4.2 Why ‘deep deconfinement’? . 22 1.5 Novel aspects of heavy ion physics at the LHC . 23 1.5.1 Low-x partondistributionfunctions . 24 1.5.2 Hardpartons:probesoftheQGPmedium . 30 2 Charm in heavy ion collisions 35 2.1 HeavyquarkproductioninpQCD. 36 2.2 Physics of open charm in heavy ion collisions . 38 2.3 Partonenergyloss .......................... 40 2.3.1 Medium-induced radiative energy loss . 41 2.3.2 Quenchingweights ...................... 44 2.3.3 Deadconeeffectforheavyquarks . 46 2.4 Pre-LHC measurements of open charm production in pA and AA 49 2.5 ProbingtheQGPwithcharmattheLHC . 53 2.5.1 Strategy for the exclusive reconstruction of D0 mesons with ALICE 53 2.5.2 Outline for the physics sensitivity studies . 55 i 3 Charm and beauty production at the LHC 59 3.1 Cross sections in nucleon–nucleon collisions . 59 3.2 Extrapolation to heavy ion collisions . 63 3.2.1 Nucleus–nucleus collisions . 63 3.2.2 Proton–nucleus collisions . 67 3.3 Heavy quark kinematical distributions . 69 3.4 Heavy quark production in Monte Carlo event generators . 72 3.5 Hadron yields and distributions . 76 4 The ALICE experiment at the LHC 81 4.1 TheALICEdetector ......................... 81 4.1.1 Detectorlayout ........................ 81 4.1.2 Inner Tracking System (ITS) . 84 4.1.3 TimeProjectionChamber(TPC) . 86 4.1.4 Particle identification system . 88 4.2 Eventsimulationandreconstruction . 89 4.2.1 Eventgenerators ....................... 90 4.2.2 Simulationofthedetectorresponse . 91 4.2.3 Trackreconstruction . 92 4.3 LHCbeamsandinteractionregion . 102 4.3.1 Luminosity and beam size . 102 4.3.2 Interaction region in Pb–Pb collisions . 103 4.3.3 Interaction region in pp collisions . 104 5 Identification of heavy flavour decay vertices: experimental issues107 5.1 PrimaryvertexreconstructioninPb–Pb . 109 5.2 TrackimpactparameterresolutioninPb–Pb . 110 5.2.1 Transverse momentum dependence . 110 5.2.2 Effect of missing and misassigned clusters . 111 5.2.3 Comparison of detailed and fast ITS simulation . 113 5.2.4 Particletypedependence. 114 5.3 Primaryvertexreconstructioninpp. 114 5.3.1 Outlineofthemethod . 114 5.3.2 Expectedresolutions . 115 5.3.3 Vertexfinding......................... 115 5.3.4 Vertexfitting ......................... 116 ii 5.4 Trackimpactparameterresolutioninpp . 124 5.5 Secondaryvertexreconstruction . 127 6 Exclusive reconstruction of D0 particles 131 6.1 Feasibility study for Pb–Pb collisions . 131 6.1.1 Backgroundandsignalgeneration . 132 6.1.2 Detector simulation and event reconstruction . 135 6.1.3 Particle identification in the TOF detector . 137 6.1.4 Analysis ............................ 140 6.1.5 Results............................. 148 6.1.6 Results scaled to a lower-multiplicity scenario . 154 6.1.7 Feed-downfrombeauty. 154 6.2 Feasibility study for pp collisions . 159 6.2.1 Backgroundandsignalgeneration . 159 6.2.2 Event reconstruction and particle identification . 163 6.2.3 Analysis and results . 164 6.2.4 Feed-downfrombeauty. 172 6.3 Expected results for p–Pb collisions . 174 6.4 Results at lower magnetic field: B =0.2T ............. 175 6.5 Summary ............................... 175 7 Performance for the measurement of D0 production 177 7.1 Estimation of the statistical uncertainty . 177 7.1.1 S/B and S/√S + B with optimized pt-binning . 178 7.1.2 Fit of the invariant mass distribution . 181 7.2 Estimation of systematic uncertainties . 185 7.2.1 Correctionforfeed-downfrombeauty . 186 7.2.2 Cross section normalization . 187 2 0 0 7.3 Errors on d σ(D )/dptdy and dσ(D )/dy .............. 189 7.4 ComparisonwithpQCDpredictions. 192 7.5 Energyextrapolationoftheppresult . 193 7.6 Perspectives for the measurement ofN(b B D0)/N(c D0). 195 → → → 8 Quenching of open charm mesons 201 8.1 Medium parameters: path length and transport coefficient . 202 8.2 Charm energy loss with quenching weights . 209 8.3 Results (I): nuclear modification factor RAA forDmesons. 214 iii 8.4 Results (II): D/hadrons ratio .................... 218 Conclusions 223 A Kinematics of the D0 K−π+ decay 225 → B PYTHIA parameters used for heavy quark generation at LHC energies229 C Parameterization of the TPC tracking response: validation tests231 C.1 Description of the track parameters used in the TPC . 231 C.2 Validationtestsandresults. 232 C.2.1 Tracking efficiency in the TPC and in the ITS . 232 C.2.2 Resolution on the track parameters in TPC–ITS . 234 C.2.3 Effect on the required computing resources . 234 D Further studies on the impact parameter resolution 237 References 243 Acknowledgements 251 iv Introduction The search for quark–gluon plasma —the state of deconfined strongly interacting matter which is thought to have constituted the 1-µs-old Universe— received a big boost in the 1990s with the acceleration of heavy ions in the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN. There, several fixed-target experiments gave results, on different physical observables, indicating that a new state of matter with unusual properties is formed in the early stage of the collisions. Heavy ion physics has now entered the collider era. Results from experiments at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) have provided further evidence for the long-sought quark–gluon plasma and encourage the study of its properties at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), where energy densities of 100-600 times the density of atomic nuclei ∼ will be reached in the collisions of lead nuclei at 5.5 TeV per nucleon–nucleon pair. The recent results from RHIC suggest that it is possible to probe the dense medium formed in nucleus–nucleus collisions through the reduction in the pro- duction of high-momentum particles. This effect may be, indeed, due to an energy loss, or quenching, of the partons as they propagate through the medium. If this is the case, the new deconfined phase can be probed and investigated by means of a ‘tomography’ with beams of energetic partons. At the LHC the probes being used at RHIC, light quarks and gluons, will extend their energy range by one order of magnitude and a new type of probe will become available with fairly high cross sections: heavy quarks. The large masses of the charm and beauty quarks make them qualitatively different probes, since, on well-established quantum chromodynamics grounds, in-medium energy loss off massive partons is expected to be significantly smaller than off massless partons. Therefore, a comparative study of the attenuation of massless (gluons and light quarks) and massive probes is a promising tool to test the coherence of the interpretation of quenching effects as energy loss in a deconfined medium and to further investigate the properties of such medium. 1 In this work we focus on charm physics with ALICE1, the heavy ion ded- icated experiment at the LHC. The aim is to study the ALICE capability to measure charm production with good precision (small statistical errors) and ac- curacy (small systematic errors) even in the high track-multiplicity environment of central lead–lead collisions and to carry out the above-mentioned comparative quenching studies. The physics framework is outlined in the first part of the thesis (Chapters 1 and 2), where we present the status of the experimental study of deconfinement in heavy ion collisions and the qualitative improvement expected in this field at the LHC collider and we detail how charm particles can serve as probes of deconfined matter. The experimental framework, ALICE, is described in Chapter 4, in terms of layout, main sub-systems and their expected performance. The activity carried out for this thesis can be summarized in the following four parts. Definition of a baseline for heavy quarks production cross sections and kine- • matical distributions. The HVQMNR computer program for perturbative quantum chromodynamics calculations was deployed to obtain and compare results at different energies and for different colliding systems, taking into account known nuclear collective effects. The Monte Carlo event generator PYTHIA was tuned in order to reproduce such results. This item is covered in Chapter 3. Study of the experimental issues related to the identification of the displaced • decay vertices of charm mesons. Since charm particles have decay lengths of few tenths of a millimeter, a precise reconstruction of the event topology in the interaction region is mandatory for a high-quality charm physics programme. The ALICE Inner Tracking System was designed to provide the required precision. Using the latest detector geometry/response parameters and track reconstruction algorithms, we carried out a systematic study of the track impact parameter resolution for different particle species and in different multiplicity environments, from central lead–lead to proton–proton collisions. For the latter case, we developed and tested a dedicated algorithm for the reconstruction of the interaction vertex position in three dimensions. These items are discussed in Chapter 5. 1A Large Ion Collider Experiment 2 Definition of a strategy for the exclusive reconstruction of charm mesons • with ALICE and evaluation of the performance in terms of momentum range, precision and accuracy of the measurement.