DOCSLIB.ORG

Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech Under Different Types of Interference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech Under Different Types of Interference Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech under Different Types of Interference Andrea Olguin, Tristan A. Bekinschtein, and Mirjana Bozic Abstract ■ We examined how attention modulates the neural encoding Critically, however, the type of the interfering stream significantly of continuous speech under different types of interference. In modulated this process, with the fully intelligible distractor an EEG experiment, participants attended to a narrative in English (English) causing the strongest encoding of both attended and while ignoring a competing stream in the other ear. Four different unattended streams and latest dissociation between them and types of interference were presented to the unattended ear: a nonintelligible distractors causing weaker encoding and early dis- different English narrative, a narrative in a language unknown to sociation between attended and unattended streams. The results the listener (Spanish), a well-matched nonlinguistic acoustic inter- were consistent over the time course of the spoken narrative. ference (Musical Rain), and no interference. Neural encoding of These findings suggest that attended and unattended information attended and unattended signals was assessed by calculating can be differentiated at different depths of processing analysis, cross-correlations between their respective envelopes and the with the locus of selective attention determined by the nature EEG recordings. Findings revealed more robust neural encoding of the competing stream. They provide strong support to flexible for the attended envelopes compared with the ignored ones. accounts of auditory selective attention. ■ INTRODUCTION “late selection” approaches. The early selection theory Directingattentiontoasinglespeakerinamultitalker (Broadbent, 1958) argued that, because of our limited environment is an everyday occurrence that we manage processing capacity, attended and unattended informa- with relative ease. This phenomenon is commonly tion is differentiated early in perceptual processing. More termed as the “cocktail party” effect (Cherry, 1953). A specifically, sensory features can guide attentional selec- large body of research has sought to assess how the un- tion early on, thus determining what will be subsequently derlying attentional mechanisms operate and how much processed for meaning. The late selection approach of the nonattended signal is perceived in such situations, (Duncan, 1980; Deutsch & Deutsch, 1963) proposed that producing mixed results. Here, we aim to assess these selective attention cannot affect the perceptual analysis questions by investigating the neural encoding of contin- of the stimuli and that both attended and unattended in- uous attended speech under different types of linguistic puts are processed equivalently by the perceptual sys- and nonlinguistic interference. tem. In this view, selective attention only acts later in the process, after the input had undergone semantic en- coding and analysis. Subsequent theories argued that un- Selective Attention attended information might be attenuated rather than completely filtered out, allowing unattended information Selective attention is the ability to sustain focus on task- with low identification thresholds (as determined by their relevant stimuli in the presence of distractors. This has semantic features) to reach awareness (Treisman, 1969). long been recognized as an essential cognitive capacity Johnston and Heinz (1978) suggested that selective (e.g., James, 1890) because our brains are continuously attention is a multimode flexible system, where attended flooded with information but limited in what they can and unattended information can be differentiated at process. Nevertheless, listeners are also often distracted different depths of processing analysis. They also argued by irrelevant stimuli, prompting the questions about the that selective attention itself requires processing capacity locus and mechanisms of attentional allocation in the (cf. Kahneman, 1973), with later selection requiring more presence of competing streams of information. Histori- processing capacity and effort. On this account, efficient cally, two major views guiding research on auditory selection can be achieved early based on sensory dif- selective attention were the “early selection” and the ferences between attended and unattended streams; however, in the absence of effective sensory cues, se- University of Cambridge mantic features will be driving the differentiation later © 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 30:11, pp. 1606–1619 doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01303 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jocn_a_01303 by guest on 29 September 2021 in the process, using more capacity. A more recent Neural Encoding of Attended and account of attention allocation in speech comprehension Unattended Streams (Bronkhorst, 2015) also argues that attentional selection can be triggered at different processing depths. Attention The temporal envelope of speech is strongly represented triggered early on is based on basic signal properties in the brain, with several studies showing a significant (sound level, fundamental frequency) and enables fast correlation between speech envelopes and cortical activ- selection, whereas attention at later processing stages ity (Lalor & Foxe, 2010; Abrams, Nicol, Zecker, & Kraus, is based on complex information, such as syntactic and 2008; Aiken & Picton, 2008). These correlations appear to semantic information, and used for slow selection. be a result of phase locking or synchronization between neural activity and the slow amplitude modulations of the speech envelope, which are mainly present in the theta frequency band (3–7 Hz) and correspond to the syllabic Experimental Evidence rate of speech (Doelling, Arnal, Ghitza, & Poeppel, 2014; A substantial body of research used dichotic listening to Giraud & Poeppel, 2012; Drullman, Festen, & Plomp, assess whether auditory attention selects information 1994). Phase locking has also been observed for noise- early on, based on the physical characteristics of the stim- vocoded speech (i.e., stimuli in which the slow amplitude ulus, or after the input has been processed up to a se- fluctuations are preserved but spectral details are reduced) mantic level. The results are mixed, with some studies but is stronger for intelligible stimuli (Ding, Chatterjee, & showing that both attended and unattended information Simon, 2013; Peelle, Gross, & Davis, 2013). can be processed up to the semantic level (Bentin, Kutas, Selective attention has been shown to have a robust & Hillyard, 1995; Wood & Cowan, 1995; Eich, 1984) and influence on these synchronizations. In “cocktail party” others finding no evidence for semantic processing of the paradigms, the auditory system preferentially tracks the unattended stream (Wood, Stadler, & Cowan, 1997; temporal envelope of the attended talker and appears Newstead & Dennis, 1979). The inconsistency has been to be out of phase with the ignored speech stream attributed to inadequate control of attentional shifts to (Rimmele, Zion Golumbic, Schröger, & Poeppel, 2015; the unattended ear (Dupoux, Kouider, & Mehler, 2003; Hambrook & Tata, 2014; Horton, Srinivasan, & D’Zmura, Holender, 1986), prompting the claim that listeners can- 2014; Horton, D’Zmura, & Srinivasan, 2013; Ding & not semantically process information that is genuinely Simon, 2012a; Zion Golumbic, Poeppel, & Schroeder, unattended. Yet, further studies demonstrated that unat- 2012; Kerlin, Shahin, & Miller, 2010). This phenomenon tended information can be processed in the absence has been referred to as the “selective entrainment hy- of attention shifts to the irrelevant channel (Rivenez, pothesis” (Zion Golumbic et al., 2013; Giraud & Poeppel, Guillaume, Bourgeon, & Darwin, 2008) and that it can, 2012; Schroeder & Lakatos, 2010; Lakatos, Karmos, Mehta, under certain conditions, be processed up to the seman- Ulbert, & Schroeder, 2008), which suggests that attention tic and syntactic processing levels (Aydelott, Jamaluddin, causes low-frequency neural oscillations to entrain to the & Nixon Pearce, 2015; Pulvermüller, Shtyrov, Hasting, & temporal envelope of the attended speech stream. For Carlyon, 2008). This conclusion is also consistent with instance, Rimmele et al. (2015) used magnetoencepha- theargumentthattheauditorysystem—although able lography and a cocktail paradigm to reveal stronger to selectively focus processing on the relevant stream— attentional encoding for natural speech compared with has surplus capacity to process auditory information from noise-vocoded speech. They suggested that attentional other streams, regardless of the perceptual load in the enhancement of speech tracking depends on the pres- attended stream (Murphy, Fraenkel, & Dalton, 2013). ence of fine structure in the stimulus. In another study, However, it has also been argued that the nature of the Hambrook and Tata (2014) presented two simultaneous measurement can determine whether the processing of audiobook clips while EEG was being recorded. Atten- the unattended message is observed or not (Rivenez tional selection increased the EEG signals that were syn- et al., 2008), with studies using explicit measures (e.g., chronized with the attended stream, but not the ignored word recall) more likely to find that unattended message one. Similarly, Horton et al. (2013) asked participants to was not processed. attend to one of two competing speech streams. The Thus,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Linguistic Processing of Task-Irrelevant Speech at a Cocktail Party Paz Har-Shai Yahav*, Elana Zion Golumbic*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party Paz Har-shai Yahav*, Elana Zion Golumbic* The Gonda Center for Multidisciplinary Brain Research, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel Abstract Paying attention to one speaker in a noisy place can be extremely difficult, because to- be-attended and task-irrelevant speech compete for processing resources. We tested whether this competition is restricted to acoustic-phonetic interference or if it extends to competition for linguistic processing as well. Neural activity was recorded using Magnetoencephalography as human participants were instructed to attend to natural speech presented to one ear, and task- irrelevant stimuli were presented to the other. Task-irrelevant stimuli consisted either of random sequences of syllables, or syllables structured to form coherent sentences, using hierarchical frequency-tagging. We find that the phrasal structure of structured task-irrelevant stimuli was represented in the neural response in left inferior frontal and posterior parietal regions, indicating that selective attention does not fully eliminate linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech. Additionally, neural tracking of to-be-attended speech in left inferior frontal regions was enhanced when competing with structured task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting inherent competition between them for linguistic processing. Introduction *For correspondence: The seminal speech-shadowing experiments conducted in the 50 s and 60 s set the stage for study- [email protected] (PH-Y); ing one of the primary cognitive challenges encountered in daily life: how do our perceptual and lin- [email protected] (EZG) guistic systems deal effectively with competing speech inputs? (Cherry, 1953; Broadbent, 1958; Treisman, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • Dichotic Training in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder
    International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 110 (2018) 114–117 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijporl Dichotic training in children with auditory processing disorder T ∗ Maryam Delphia, Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahib, a Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran b Audiology Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Objectives: Several test batteries have been suggested for auditory processing disorder (APD) diagnosis. One of Dichotic listening the important tests is dichotic listening tests. Significant ear asymmetry (usually right ear advantage) can be Auditory training indicative of (APD). Two main trainings have been suggested for dichotic listening disorders: Differential Auditory processing Interaural Intensity Difference (DIID) and Dichotic Offset Training (DOT). The aim of the present study was comparing the efficacy of these two trainings in resolving dichotic listening disorders. Methods: 12 children in the age range of 8 to 9 years old with APD were included (mean age 8.41 years old ± 0.51). They all had abnormal right ear advantage based on established age-appropriate norms for Farsi dichotic digit test. Then subjects were randomly divided into two groups (each contained 6 subjects): group 1 received DIID training (8.33 years old ± 0.51) and group 2 received DOT training (8.50 years old ± 0.54). Results: Both trainings were effective in improvement of dichotic listening. There was a significant difference between two trainings with respect to the length of treatment (P-value≤0.001). DOT needed more training sessions (12.83 ± 0.98 sessions) than DIID (21.16 ± 0.75 sessions) to achieve the same amount of performance improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Divided Attention in Dichotic Listening
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (4), 699-703 Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening GREGORY J. H. COLFLESH University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois AND ANDREW R. A. CONWAY Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey The controlled attention theory of working memory suggests that individuals with greater working memory capacity (WMC) are better able to control or focus their attention than individuals with lesser WMC. This re- lationship has been observed in a number of selective attention paradigms including a dichotic listening task (Conway, Cowan, & Bunting, 2001) in which participants were required to shadow words presented to one ear and ignore words presented to the other ear. Conway et al. found that when the participant’s name was presented to the ignored ear, 65% of participants with low WMC reported hearing their name, compared to only 20% of participants with high WMC, suggesting greater selective attention on the part of high WMC participants. In the present study, individual differences in divided attention were examined in a dichotic listening task, in which participants shadowed one message and listened for their own name in the other message. Here we find that 66.7% of high WMC and 34.5% of low WMC participants detected their name. These results suggest that as WMC capacity increases, so does the ability to control the focus of attention, with high WMC participants being able to flexibly “zoom in” or “zoom out” depending on task demands. Since Baddeley and Hitch (1974) first published their tasks). They found no difference between high and low seminal chapter on working memory (WM), many theo- WMC participants in the prosaccade task but high WMC ries regarding the construct have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadbent's Filter Theory Cherry: the Cocktail Party Problem
    194 Part II ● Cognitive psychology KEY STUDY EVALUATION — Cherry Cherry: The cocktail party problem The research by Colin Cherry is a very good example of how a psycholo- gist, noticing a real-life situation, is able to devise a hypothesis and carry Cherry (1953) found that we use physical differences between out research in order to explain a phenomenon, in this case the “cocktail the various auditory messages to select the one of interest. party” effect. Cherry tested his ideas in a laboratory using a shadowing These physical differences include differences in the sex of the technique and found that participants were really only able to give infor- speaker, in voice intensity, and in the location of the speaker. mation about the physical qualities of the non-attended message When Cherry presented two messages in the same voice to (whether the message was read by a male or a female, or if a tone was both ears at once (thereby removing these physical differences), used instead of speech). Cherry’s research could be criticised for having moved the real-life phenomenon into an artificial laboratory setting. the participants found it very hard to separate out the two However, this work opened avenues for other researchers, beginning with messages purely on the basis of meaning. Broadbent, to elaborate theories about focused auditory attention. Cherry (1953) also carried out studies using a shadowing task, in which one auditory message had to be shadowed (repeated back out aloud) while a second auditory message was presented to the other ear. Very little information seemed to be obtained from the second or non-attended message.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention 1 Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention
    Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention 1 Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention There has been a large increase in research activity in the area of attention since the 1950s. This research has focused not only on attention, but also how attention is related to memory and executive functioning. Human learning and behaviour are dependent on our ability to pay attention to our environment, retain and retrieve information, and use cognitive strategies. An understanding of the development of attention is also critical when we consider that deficits in attention often lead to difficulties in school and in the work force. Thus, attention is an important topic in the study of psychology, specifically in the areas of development (see Part II of this book), learning (Part III), and psychological disorders (see the section on ADHD in Part IV). There is no doubt that an understanding of attention and related concepts is critical to our understanding of human cognition and learning. Introduction to The History of Research on Attention The study of attention is a major part of contemporary cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Attention plays a critical role in essentially all aspects of perception, cognition, and action, influencing the choices we make. The study of attention has been of interest to the field of psychology since its earliest days. However, many ideas about attention can be traced to philosophers in the 18th and 19th centuries, preceding the foundation of the field of psychology. The topic of attention was originally discussed by philosophers. Among the issues considered were the role of attention on conscious awareness and thought, and whether attention was directed voluntarily or involuntarily toward objects or events.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating CAPDOTS Training for Children and Adolescents with APD by Jay R
    ONLINE EXCLUSIVE Evaluating CAPDOTS Training for Children and Adolescents with APD By Jay R. Lucker, EdD, CCC-A/SLP, FAAA; Cydney Fox, AuD; and Bea Braun, AuD uditory processing disorders (APD) in school-age children can lead to learning problems.1 Audiolo- gists may determine the presence or absence of APD in this population and make specific thera- Apeutic recommendations. However, many therapies for APD have not been peer-reviewed or examined with statistical analysis to determine efficacy. The present study evaluates a therapeutic option called CAPDOTS-Integrated (also referred to as CAPDOTS), an online training program that aims to im- prove dichotic listening problems. According to Jerger, “Dichotic listening (DL) tests are at the core of the diagnostic evaluation of auditory processing disorder... [Such tests] have been used for decades both as 2 screening tools and as diagnostic tests in APD evaluation.” Thus, audiologists evaluating school-aged children for APD AdobeStock may find these children to have dichotic listening problems. Those diagnosed with dichotic listening problems are rec- subjects.2 The 27-year-old subject identified as diagnosed ommended to try a dichotic listening training program, such with “binaural integration deficit” only completed 80 percent as CAPDOTS-Integrated.1 Presently, CAPDOTS-Integrated of the CAPDOTS training. The 16-year-old subject is re- claims to treat binaural auditory integration problems known ported diagnosed with a binaural integration (dichotic listen- as dichotic listening difficulties. CAPDOTS is a treatment ing) auditory processing disorder. Results of mid-latency program requiring access to the internet and good quality electrophysiological measures revealed increased response headphones.
    [Show full text]
  • Attentional Strategies in Dichotic Listening
    Memory & Cognition 1979, Vol. 7 (6),511.520 Attentional strategies in dichotic listening JACK BOOKBINDER and ELI OSMAN Brooklyn College ofthe City University ofNew York, Brooklyn, New York 11210 A person can attend to a message in one ear while seemingly ignoring a simultaneously presented verbal message in the other ear. There is considerable controversy over the extent to which the unattended message is actually processed. This issue was investigated by presenting dichotic messages to which the listeners responded by buttonpressing (not shadow­ ing) to color words occurring in the primary ear message while attempting to detect a target word in either the primary ear or secondary ear message. Less than 40% of the target words were detected in the secondary ear message, whereas for the primary ear message (and also for either ear in a control experiment), target detection was approximately 80%. Furthermore. there was a significant negative correlation between buttonpressing performance and secondary ear target-detection performance. The results were interpreted as being inconsistent with automatic processing theories of attention. The dichotic listening paradigm, beginning with the processing system. Early selection models (Broadbent, experiments of Broadbent (1958) and Cherry (1953), 1958,1971; Treisman, 1960, 1964; Treisman & Geffen, has played a central role in the study of attention during 1967) allow for analyses of simple physical features the past two decades. In a dichotic presentation, differ­ simultaneously (e.g., spatial location, voice pitch), while ent auditory messages are simultaneously presented to it is postulated that the simultaneous higher order (Le., the subject's right and left ears by means of stereo head­ semantic context) analysis of all inputs would overload phones.
    [Show full text]
  • HEARING LOSS and DEMENTIA: CONNECTING the DOTS the Participant Will Be Able To:  Identify Age-Related Sensorineural Hearing Loss Presented By: and Dementia
    2/15/2019 LEARNING OBJECTIVES HEARING LOSS AND DEMENTIA: CONNECTING THE DOTS The participant will be able to: Identify age-related sensorineural hearing loss Presented by: and dementia. Distinguish hallmark signs and causes of Dr. Diana Blakeney-Billings, CCC-A Assistant Professor – Alabama A&M University dementia. CSD Department Differentiate dementia from other neurologic diseases and syndromes. and Co-presenter: Mrs. Kaci W. McAfee, BS, SLP-A CHRONIC CO-MORBIDITIES OF HEARING LOSS Psychosocial Physiological Conditions Age-related hearing loss has contributed to faster Consequences declines in other disorders. Hypertension Cognitive Disorders Dementia/cognitive disorders Cardiovascular Disease (Dementia/Alzheimer’s Untreated hearing loss is an independent variable Arthritis Disease) Balance disorders Hypertension, diabetes, and ototoxic drugs Chronic kidney disease Communication Hearing loss can threaten health outcomes Stroke Disorders particularly older aged adults. Falls Depression Older adults with hearing loss develop brain Diabetes Infectious diseases shrinkage faster. Cancer Quality of Life AGE RELATED HEARING LOSS (ARHL) CAUSES OF ARHL Chronic health condition Most Common – inner ear changes from aging Presbycusis Central changes impact perceiving auditory verbal Gradual process and nonverbal stimuli Certain medications Bilateral high frequency sensorineural loss, Morphological alterations (stria vascularis) symmetrical Central Auditory Pathway Degeneration Peripheral and central pathology Genetics
    [Show full text]
  • An Optimal Dichotic-Listening Paradigm for the Assessment of Hemispheric
    1 Research article 2 An optimal dichotic-listening paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric 3 dominance for speech processing 4 5 René Westerhausen (1,2)* & Fredrik Samuelsen (2) 6 7 (1) Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway 8 (2) Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway 9 10 Running title: Optimal dichotic-listening paradigm 11 12 13 *Corresponding author 14 René Westerhausen 15 Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, 16 POB 1094 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway 17 email: [email protected], Phone: (+47) 228 45230 18 1 19 Abstract 20 Dichotic-listening paradigms are widely accepted as non-invasive tests of hemispheric 21 dominance for language processing and represent a standard diagnostic tool for the 22 assessment of developmental auditory and language disorders. Despite its popularity in 23 research and clinical settings, dichotic paradigms show comparatively low reliability, 24 significantly threatening the validity of conclusions drawn from the results. Thus, the aim of 25 the present work was to design and evaluate a novel, highly reliable dichotic-listening 26 paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric differences. Based on an extensive literature 27 review, the paradigm was optimized to account for the main experimental variables which are 28 known to systematically bias task performance or affect random error variance. The main 29 design principle was to minimize the relevance of higher cognitive functions on task 30 performance in order to obtain stimulus-driven laterality estimates. To this end, the key 31 design features of the paradigm were the use of stop-consonant vowel (CV) syllables as 32 stimulus material, a single stimulus pair per trial presentation mode, and a free recall (single) 33 response instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds
    JSLHR Review Article Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds Barbara Shinn-Cunninghama Purpose: This review provides clinicians with an overview even in listeners with NHTs. Studies of variability in control of of recent findings relevant to understanding why listeners attention and in sensory coding fidelity may help to isolate with normal hearing thresholds (NHTs) sometimes suffer and identify some of the causes of communication disorders from communication difficulties in noisy settings. in individuals presenting at the clinic with “normal hearing.” Method: The results from neuroscience and psychoacoustics Conclusions: How well an individual with NHTs can are reviewed. understand speech amidst competing sounds depends Results: In noisy settings, listeners focus their attention by not only on the sound being audible but also on the engaging cortical brain networks to suppress unimportant integrity of cortical control networks and the fidelity of the sounds; they then can analyze and understand an important representation of suprathreshold sound. Understanding sound, such as speech, amidst competing sounds. Differences the root cause of difficulties experienced by listeners with in the efficacy of top-down control of attention can affect NHTs ultimately can lead to new, targeted interventions that communication abilities. In addition, subclinical deficits address specific deficits affecting communication in noise. in sensory fidelity can disrupt the ability to perceptually Presentation Video: http://cred.pubs.asha.org/article. segregate sound sources, interfering with selective attention, aspx?articleid=2601617 This research forum contains papers from the 2016 Research The challenge of understanding speech in settings Symposium at the ASHA Convention held in Philadelphia, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Listening Program, in the Treatment Of
    The use of LACETM, a listening program, in the treatment of problems associated with dichotic listening disorders. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Bachelors of Arts in Speech and Hearing Science with Honors in Research Distinction in the College of Arts and Sciences of The Ohio State University By Mariah N. Cheyney **** The Ohio State University 2009 Dr. Gail M. Whitelaw, Adviser Abstract Dichotic listening, or how two ears work together as a team, is critical for localizing sound sources and when listening in the presence of complex background noise. Disorders of dichotic listening can be caused by a number of issues, including neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury, and can result in communication difficulties in daily listening situations. A number of diagnostic protocols and management programs have recently been developed to address this population, based in part from interest in veterans returning from the Middle East with these types of disorders. Currently, there is no standard for assessment or rehabilitation of dichotic listening disorders. This study utilized a single-subject research design to address the potential effectiveness of a treatment program for dichotic listening difficulties. The subject presented with clinical deficits following a stroke, despite having normal hearing acuity. Auditory processing evaluation revealed severe deficits in the area of dichotic listening, most remarkably for the left ear. The patient was enrolled in the LACETM (Listening and Communications Enhancement) program, a computer-based aural rehabilitation program developed to assist patients with hearing loss acclimatize to hearing aids. The program is designed to improve listening skills through use of an adaptive program that addresses a number of auditory processing skills.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Be Learned About Brain Function from Dichotic Listening ?
    Revista Española de Neuropsicología Copyright ©2000 de REN Vol. 2, No. 3, 62-84 ISSN: 1139-9872 What can be learned about brain function from dichotic listening ?. Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen A series of studies on the use of dichotic listening as a method to study brain-behavior interactions, including hemispheric asymmetry are reviewed. The dichotic listening method is presented from a historical perspective, followed by an outline of the empirical procedure used in our laboratory. Different methods of validating the dichotic listening procedure against both invasive and non-invasive techniques, including PET blood flow recordings are then presented. The paper is ended with some examples of clinical applications of the dichotic listening technique on brain damaged patients. A major argument in the present paper is that the dichotic listening technique is a method to study the interaction between bottom-up, or stimulus-driven, versus top-down, or instruction-driven laterality. This opens up for a more dynamic and interactive view of brain laterality than the traditional static view that the brain is lateralized only for specific stimuli and stimulus properties. ¿Qué se puede Aprender sobre el Funcionamiento del Cerebro a partir de la Escucha Dicótica? Se revisan una serie de estudios sobre el uso del estudio de la escucha dicótica como método para estudiar las interacciones entre cerebro y comportamiento, incluyendo la asimetría interhemisférica. Se presenta el método de la escucha dicótica desde una perspectiva histórica seguido por una revisión de los métodos empíricos utilizados en nuestro laboratorio. Posteriormente, se presentan diferentes métodos para validar este procedimiento en contra de las técnicas invasivas y no invasivas.
    [Show full text]