DOCSLIB.ORG

Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds JSLHR Review Article Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds Barbara Shinn-Cunninghama Purpose: This review provides clinicians with an overview even in listeners with NHTs. Studies of variability in control of of recent findings relevant to understanding why listeners attention and in sensory coding fidelity may help to isolate with normal hearing thresholds (NHTs) sometimes suffer and identify some of the causes of communication disorders from communication difficulties in noisy settings. in individuals presenting at the clinic with “normal hearing.” Method: The results from neuroscience and psychoacoustics Conclusions: How well an individual with NHTs can are reviewed. understand speech amidst competing sounds depends Results: In noisy settings, listeners focus their attention by not only on the sound being audible but also on the engaging cortical brain networks to suppress unimportant integrity of cortical control networks and the fidelity of the sounds; they then can analyze and understand an important representation of suprathreshold sound. Understanding sound, such as speech, amidst competing sounds. Differences the root cause of difficulties experienced by listeners with in the efficacy of top-down control of attention can affect NHTs ultimately can lead to new, targeted interventions that communication abilities. In addition, subclinical deficits address specific deficits affecting communication in noise. in sensory fidelity can disrupt the ability to perceptually Presentation Video: http://cred.pubs.asha.org/article. segregate sound sources, interfering with selective attention, aspx?articleid=2601617 This research forum contains papers from the 2016 Research The challenge of understanding speech in settings Symposium at the ASHA Convention held in Philadelphia, PA. where there are multiple sound sources is known as the n a sizeable minority of cases, patients seeking audio- cocktail party problem, a term originally coined by Cherry logical treatment have normal hearing thresholds (1953). Understanding how listeners with normal hear- (NHTs) but report difficulties understanding speech ing solve the cocktail party problem has remained a focus I of study for over 50 years (e.g., see Bee & Micheyl, 2008; when there are competing sound sources (Hind et al., 2011). Such listeners are said to have “central auditory process- Bodden, 1993; Hafter et al., 2013; Wood & Cowan, 1995; ing disorder” or “auditory processing disorder” (Furman, Yost, 1997), in no small part because of its importance: Kujawa, & Liberman, 2013; Kujawa & Liberman, 2009; Lin, difficulties in such settings expose communication difficul- Furman, Kujawa, & Liberman, 2011; Rosen, Cohen, & ties that do not show up in simpler listening conditions. Vanniasegaram, 2010), a catchall diagnosis that says nothing There are numerous reasons why listeners with NHTs about the underlying causes of the communication diffi- might find it difficult to communicate in noisy environ- culties, making it difficult to develop effective treatments. ments, from language-specific deficits to general cognitive deficits. This article reviews two specific issues that can affect the ability of listeners with NHTs to solve the cock- tail party problem: (a) efficacy of cognitive control net- works in the brain responsible for focusing selective auditory aCenter for Research in Sensory Communication and Emerging Neural Technology, Boston University, MA attention and (b) fidelity of the sensory representation of suprathreshold (clearly audible) sound. By differentiating Correspondence to Barbara Shinn-Cunningham: [email protected] among more specific mechanistic failures that can impede Editor-in-Chief: Frederick (Erick) Gallun Editor: Karen Helfer communication in complex settings, clinicians will be able Received February 27, 2017 Revision received June 23, 2017 Accepted July 5, 2017 Disclosure: The author has declared that no competing interests existed at the time https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0080 of publication. 2976 Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research • Vol. 60 • 2976–2988 • October 2017 • Copyright © 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Research Forum: Advances in Research on Auditory Attention and the Processing of Complex Auditory Stimuli Downloaded From: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org/ by a Boston University User on 10/19/2017 Terms of Use: http://pubs.asha.org/ss/rights_and_permissions.aspx to provide appropriate counseling and care management This inability to process everything in a scene enables and, ultimately, targeted interventions. a skilled magician to astonish us with her sleight of hand; At first, it may seem surprising that listeners can have by drawing our attention to some salient, engaging event, difficulty understanding speech in cocktail party settings such as a dramatic flourish of her cape, we miss how she but do not report difficulty in other listening situations. drops the “disappearing” coin into her pocket. In a com- However, solving the cocktail party problem places much plex scene, we naturally focus on an object that is interest- greater cognitive and sensory demands on the listener ing, either because it is inherently important (such as the than does listening in quiet. As discussed in the section on sight of a lone person in an empty restaurant or the sound We Rely on Selective Attention to Communicate in Noisy of a voice amidst buses and cars on a busy street) or be- Social Settings, audibility often is not the factor that limits cause it is surprising (such as an unexpected flash of light- understanding for listeners with NHTs. Instead, central ning or a sudden clap of thunder). In the laboratory, our processing resources can limit what we can consciously per- poor ability to identify changes in complex visual or audi- ceive. We manage this limitation by focusing attention on tory scenes—especially when the change is in some “boring” whatever acoustic source we will process, which relies on background detail—is known as either “change blind- engaging cortical networks to filter inputs in ways that are ness” (e.g., see Beck, Rees, Frith, & Lavie, 2001; Rensink, unnecessary in quiet. Some listeners may have problems 2002; Simons & Levin, 1997; Simons & Rensink, 2005) controlling cortical control networks and, therefore, have or “change deafness” (e.g., see Dalton & Fraenkel, 2012; difficulty focusing selectively on whatever sound they want Eramudugolla, Irvine, McAnally, Martin, & Mattingley, to hear, an idea developed further in the section Individuals 2005; Koreimann, Gula, & Vitouch, 2014), respectively. Ex- Differ in Their Ability to Control Selective Attention. More periments investigating change blindness and change deaf- important, as discussed in the section on Auditory Selective ness provide controlled laboratory demonstrations of the Attention Depends on Auditory Object Formation, selec- idea that, unless we actively attend to sensory informa- tion of a sound source from a mixture of competing sounds tion that is readily available on the retina or the cochlea, can only be effective if we are able to perceptually segregate we will fail to consciously perceive that information. Change the sources in the sound mixture reaching our ears, a pro- blindness and change deafness prove that we do not pro- cess known as auditory scene analysis (Bregman, 1990). The cess every bit of information available to us; instead, atten- ability to analyze and make sense of an auditory scene de- tion governs a bottleneck in our perceptual processing, pends upon the sensory representation of the acoustic mix- determining what we “see” and “hear” from the informa- ture being robust and rich enough to support perceptual tion assailing our eyes and ears. segregation. Critically, as discussed in the section on Indi- What object a listener (or viewer) attends is not sim- viduals Differ in Their Ability to Encode Fine Temporal ply determined by top-down intention (focusing on some- Details in Suprathreshold Sound, even listeners with NHTs thing we think is important, behaviorally). Instead, there is may suffer from sensory deficits that impair auditory scene a complex interplay between volitional focus and bottom-up analysis. salience (Desimone & Duncan, 1995; Kastner & Ungerleider, The outcome of having difficulty when trying to 2001). Specifically, sudden, unexpected events can draw understand speech in noisy settings may be caused by very attention involuntarily, no matter what one’s intention; for different underlying causes. As discussed in the section instance, if you are trying to listen to your date at a loud Future Impact in the Clinic, there are no effective treatments restaurant and the waiter drops a tray behind you, your yet for these issues; however, as we begin to understand attention will be drawn to the crash of the glass and china the mechanisms that can lead to difficulties communicat- at your back. Regardless of whether the sound that is ing in noise, specific interventions and treatments can be attended to is something you were trying to hear or some- developed. thing that grabbed your focus involuntarily, the result is the same: once you are focused on one sound, other sounds outside the focus of attention are processed with less detail. We Rely on Selective Attention to Attention Modulates What Information Communicate in Noisy Social Settings Is Encoded in Sensory Cortical Regions Selective Attention Determines What
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech Under Different Types of Interference
    Neural Encoding of Attended Continuous Speech under Different Types of Interference Andrea Olguin, Tristan A. Bekinschtein, and Mirjana Bozic Abstract ■ We examined how attention modulates the neural encoding Critically, however, the type of the interfering stream significantly of continuous speech under different types of interference. In modulated this process, with the fully intelligible distractor an EEG experiment, participants attended to a narrative in English (English) causing the strongest encoding of both attended and while ignoring a competing stream in the other ear. Four different unattended streams and latest dissociation between them and types of interference were presented to the unattended ear: a nonintelligible distractors causing weaker encoding and early dis- different English narrative, a narrative in a language unknown to sociation between attended and unattended streams. The results the listener (Spanish), a well-matched nonlinguistic acoustic inter- were consistent over the time course of the spoken narrative. ference (Musical Rain), and no interference. Neural encoding of These findings suggest that attended and unattended information attended and unattended signals was assessed by calculating can be differentiated at different depths of processing analysis, cross-correlations between their respective envelopes and the with the locus of selective attention determined by the nature EEG recordings. Findings revealed more robust neural encoding of the competing stream. They provide strong support to flexible for the attended envelopes compared with the ignored ones. accounts of auditory selective attention. ■ INTRODUCTION “late selection” approaches. The early selection theory Directingattentiontoasinglespeakerinamultitalker (Broadbent, 1958) argued that, because of our limited environment is an everyday occurrence that we manage processing capacity, attended and unattended informa- with relative ease.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention 1 Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention
    Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention 1 Applied History of Psychology/History of Research on Attention There has been a large increase in research activity in the area of attention since the 1950s. This research has focused not only on attention, but also how attention is related to memory and executive functioning. Human learning and behaviour are dependent on our ability to pay attention to our environment, retain and retrieve information, and use cognitive strategies. An understanding of the development of attention is also critical when we consider that deficits in attention often lead to difficulties in school and in the work force. Thus, attention is an important topic in the study of psychology, specifically in the areas of development (see Part II of this book), learning (Part III), and psychological disorders (see the section on ADHD in Part IV). There is no doubt that an understanding of attention and related concepts is critical to our understanding of human cognition and learning. Introduction to The History of Research on Attention The study of attention is a major part of contemporary cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Attention plays a critical role in essentially all aspects of perception, cognition, and action, influencing the choices we make. The study of attention has been of interest to the field of psychology since its earliest days. However, many ideas about attention can be traced to philosophers in the 18th and 19th centuries, preceding the foundation of the field of psychology. The topic of attention was originally discussed by philosophers. Among the issues considered were the role of attention on conscious awareness and thought, and whether attention was directed voluntarily or involuntarily toward objects or events.
    [Show full text]
  • HEARING LOSS and DEMENTIA: CONNECTING the DOTS the Participant Will Be Able To:  Identify Age-Related Sensorineural Hearing Loss Presented By: and Dementia
    2/15/2019 LEARNING OBJECTIVES HEARING LOSS AND DEMENTIA: CONNECTING THE DOTS The participant will be able to: Identify age-related sensorineural hearing loss Presented by: and dementia. Distinguish hallmark signs and causes of Dr. Diana Blakeney-Billings, CCC-A Assistant Professor – Alabama A&M University dementia. CSD Department Differentiate dementia from other neurologic diseases and syndromes. and Co-presenter: Mrs. Kaci W. McAfee, BS, SLP-A CHRONIC CO-MORBIDITIES OF HEARING LOSS Psychosocial Physiological Conditions Age-related hearing loss has contributed to faster Consequences declines in other disorders. Hypertension Cognitive Disorders Dementia/cognitive disorders Cardiovascular Disease (Dementia/Alzheimer’s Untreated hearing loss is an independent variable Arthritis Disease) Balance disorders Hypertension, diabetes, and ototoxic drugs Chronic kidney disease Communication Hearing loss can threaten health outcomes Stroke Disorders particularly older aged adults. Falls Depression Older adults with hearing loss develop brain Diabetes Infectious diseases shrinkage faster. Cancer Quality of Life AGE RELATED HEARING LOSS (ARHL) CAUSES OF ARHL Chronic health condition Most Common – inner ear changes from aging Presbycusis Central changes impact perceiving auditory verbal Gradual process and nonverbal stimuli Certain medications Bilateral high frequency sensorineural loss, Morphological alterations (stria vascularis) symmetrical Central Auditory Pathway Degeneration Peripheral and central pathology Genetics
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of an Auditory Lateralization Training in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Audiol Otol 2016;20(2):102-108 pISSN 2384-1621 / eISSN 2384-1710 http://dx.doi.org/10.7874/jao.2016.20.2.102 Effects of an Auditory Lateralization Training in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder Yones Lotfi1, Abdollah Moosavi2, Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi3, Enayatollah Bakhshi4, and Hamed Sadjedi5 1Audiology Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, 2Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 3Audiology Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, 4Biostatistics Department, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, 5Engineering Faculty, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran Background and Objectives: Central auditory processing disorder [(C)APD] refers to a deficit in auditory stimuli processing in nervous system that is not due to higher-order lan- guage or cognitive factors. One of the problems in children with (C)APD is spatial difficulties which have been overlooked despite their significance. Localization is an auditory ability to detect sound sources in space and can help to differentiate between the desired speech from other simultaneous sound sources. Aim of this research was investigating effects of an auditory lateralization training on speech perception in presence of noise/competing signals in children suspected to (C)APD. Subjects and Methods: In this analytical interven- tional study, 60 children suspected to (C)APD were selected based on multiple auditory Received May 30, 2016 processing assessment subtests. They were randomly divided into two groups: control Revised July 14, 2016 (mean age 9.07) and training groups (mean age 9.00). Training program consisted of de- Accepted August 3, 2016 tection and pointing to sound sources delivered with interaural time differences under Address for correspondence headphones for 12 formal sessions (6 weeks).
    [Show full text]
  • The Auditory System at the Cocktail Party Chapter 5 Modeling the Cocktail Party Problem
    Springer Handbook of Auditory Research John C. Middlebrooks Jonathan Z. Simon Arthur N. Popper Richard R. Fay Editors The Auditory System at the Cocktail Party Chapter 5 Modeling the Cocktail Party Problem Mounya Elhilali Abstract Modeling the cocktail party problem entails developing a computational framework able to describe what the auditory system does when faced with a complex auditory scene. While completely intuitive and omnipresent in humans and animals alike, translating this remarkable ability into a quantitative model remains a challenge. This chapter touches on difficulties facing the field in terms of defining the theoretical principles that govern auditory scene analysis, as well as reconciling current knowledge about perceptual and physiological data with their formulation into computational models. The chapter reviews some of the compu- tational theories, algorithmic strategies, and neural infrastructure proposed in the literature for developing information systems capable of processing multisource sound inputs. Because of divergent interests from various disciplines in the cocktail party problem, the body of literature modeling this effect is equally diverse and multifaceted. The chapter touches on the various approaches used in modeling auditory scene analysis from biomimetic models to strictly engineering systems. Keywords Computational auditory scene analysis Á Feature extraction Á Inference model Á Multichannel audio signal Á Population separation Á Receptive field Á Source separation Á Stereo mixture Á Temporal coherence 5.1 Introduction In everyday life, humans are constantly challenged to attend to specific sound sources or follow particular conversations in the midst of competing background chatter—a phenomenon referred to as the “cocktail party problem” (Cherry 1953). Whether at a real cocktail party, walking down a busy street, or having a conver- M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Attention and Working Memory
    In: New Research on Short-Term Memory ISBN 978-1-60456-548-5 Editor: Noah B. Johansen, pp. © 2008 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 The Relationship between Attention and Working Memory Daryl Fougnie Vanderbilt University Abstract The ability to selectively process information (attention) and to retain information in an accessible state (working memory) are critical aspects of our cognitive capacities. While there has been much work devoted to understanding attention and working memory, the nature of the relationship between these constructs is not well understood. Indeed, while neither attention nor working memory represent a uniform set of processes, theories of their relationship tend to focus on only some aspects. This review of the literature examines the role of perceptual and central attention in the encoding, maintenance, and manipulation of information in working memory. While attention and working memory were found to interact closely during encoding and manipulation, the evidence suggests a limited role of attention in the maintenance of information. Additionally, only central attention was found to be necessary for manipulating information in working memory. This suggests that theories should consider the multifaceted nature of attention and working memory. The review concludes with a model describing how attention and working memory interact. I. Introduction The capacity to perform some complex tasks depends critically on the ability to retain task-relevant information in an accessible state over time (working memory) and to selectively process information in the environment (attention). As one example, consider driving a car in an unfamiliar city. In order to get to your destination, directions have to be retained and kept in working memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory Selective Attention: an Introduction and Evidence for Distinct Facilitation and Inhibition Mechanisms
    Aus dem Epilepsiezentrum Erlangen Leiter: Prof. Dr. med. Hermann Stefan der Neurologischen Klinik mit Poliklinik der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Direktor: Prof. Dr. med. Stefan Schwab Durchgeführt im Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute der University of California, Berkeley, USA Direktor: Robert T. Knight, M.D. Betreuer: Aurélie Bidet-Caulet, Ph.D. Auditory Selective Attention: an introduction and evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg vorgelegt von Constanze Elisabeth Anna Mikyska aus München Gedruckt mit Erlaubnis der Medizinischen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h.c. J. Schüttler Referent: Prof. Dr. med. H. Stefan Korreferent: Prof. Dr. med. Dipl.-Psych. Ch. Lang Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29. Februar 2012 To my family Table of contents 1 Summary 1 1.1 Summary 1 1.2 Zusammenfassung 3 2 Introduction 5 2.1 Auditory system: anatomy and function 5 2.1.1 Ear 5 2.1.2 Sub-cortical auditory relays 10 2.1.3 Auditory cortex 13 2.2 Investigation of auditory perception and processing 14 2.2.1 Psychophysics – psychoacoustics 15 2.2.2 Brain activity – electroencephalography (EEG) 17 2.2.2.1 Introduction and history 17 2.2.2.2 Physiological fundamentals 17 2.2.2.3 Recording 22 2.2.2.4 Classification of frequency 25 2.2.2.5 Artifacts 27 2.2.2.6 Data analysis: preprocessing and event-related potentials (ERP) 30 2.2.2.7
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Selective Attention and Perceptual Load in Autism Spectrum Disorder Anna Remington University College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 1 Declaration I, Anna Remington confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. A Remington 2 Abstract This thesis examines selective attention in young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Existing literature regarding this issue is mixed; some research suggesting an overly-focused attentional style (Rincover & Ducharme, 1987) while others highlight an abnormally broad attentional lens (Burack, 1994). The research presented here has, for the first time, examined selective attention in individuals with ASD using a theoretically-led approach based on Lavie’s Load Theory of attention and cognitive control (Lavie et al., 2004). Load theory states that the perceptual load (amount of potentially task relevant information) of a task affects selective attention. This theory may explain the equivocal findings in the current data on selective attention and ASD. Using behavioural measures, the pattern of selective attention under various levels of load was explored in individuals with ASD and matched controls. The results provide evidence of increased perceptual capacity in ASD. This means that, at any one time, individuals with ASD may be able to process more information from the visual environment. This increase in capacity was evident on tasks of both unconscious and conscious perception. In light of the social deficits observed in the condition, the work in this thesis also explored selective attention in the presence of social distractor stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical Classification with Rhythm Entropy for Error Processing In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Cortical Classifcation with Rhythm Entropy for Error Processing in Cocktail Party Environment Based Received: 13 February 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2018 on Scalp EEG Recording Published: xx xx xxxx Yin Tian, Wei Xu & Li Yang Using single-trial cortical signals calculated by weighted minimum norm solution estimation (WMNE), the present study explored a feature extraction method based on rhythm entropy to classify the scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals of error response from that of correct response during performing auditory-track tasks in cocktail party environment. The classifcation rate achieved 89.7% with single- trial (≈700 ms) when using support vector machine(SVM) with the leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV). And high discriminative regions mainly distributed at the medial frontal cortex (MFC), the left supplementary motor area (lSMA) and the right supplementary motor area (rSMA). The mean entropy value for error trials was signifcantly lower than that for correct trials in the discriminative cortices. By time-varying network analysis, diferent information fows changed among these discriminative regions with time, i.e. error processing showed a left-bias information fow, and correct processing presented a right-bias information fow. These fndings revealed that the rhythm information based on single cortical signals could be well used to describe characteristics of error-related EEG signals and further provided a novel application about auditory attention for brain computer interfaces (BCIs). In everyday life, the food of sensory information were regulated by attention system into a manageable stream, and attention orienting played a primary role in complex visual environment by fnding relevant information and fltering out irrelevant information to bias the target selection and processing1.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Alcohol Intoxication and the Cocktail Party Problem: Do “Mocktails” Help Or Hinder?
    Acute alcohol intoxication and the cocktail party problem: do “mocktails” help or hinder? Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Harvey, A. J. and Beaman, C. P. (2021) Acute alcohol intoxication and the cocktail party problem: do “mocktails” help or hinder? Psychopharmacology. ISSN 0033-3158 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05924-6 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/99137/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05924-6 Publisher: Springer Verlag All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Psychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05924-6 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Acute alcohol intoxication and the cocktail party problem: do “mocktails” help or hinder? Alistair J. Harvey1 · C. Philip Beaman2 Received: 23 March 2021 / Accepted: 6 July 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Rationale To test the notion that alcohol impairs auditory attentional control by reducing the listener’s cognitive capacity. Objectives We examined the efect of alcohol consumption and working memory span on dichotic speech shadowing and the cocktail party efect—the ability to focus on one of many simultaneous speakers yet still detect mention of one’s name amidst the background speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Evidence for Speech Processing Deficits During A
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Neural Evidence for Speech Processing Deficits During a Cocktail Party Scenario in Minimally and Low Verbal Adolescents and Young Adults with Autism Sophie Schwartz , Le Wang, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham , and Helen Tager-Flusberg As demonstrated by the Cocktail Party Effect, a person’s attention is grabbed when they hear their name in a multi- speaker setting. However, individuals with autism (ASD) are commonly challenged in multispeaker settings and often do not respond to salient speech, including one’s own name (OON). It is unknown whether neural responses during this Cocktail Party scenario differ in those with ASD and whether such differences are associated with expressive language or auditory filtering abilities. We measured neural responses to hearing OON in quiet and multispeaker settings using elec- troencephalography in 20 minimally or low verbal ASD (ASD-MLV), 27 verbally fluent ASD (ASD-V), and 27 neurotypical (TD) participants, ages 13–22. First, we determined whether TD’s neural responses to OON relative to other names could be quantified with early frontal mismatch responses (MMRs) and late, slow shift parietal and frontal responses (LPPs/ FNs). Second, we compared the strength of MMRs and LPPs/FNs across the three groups. Third, we tested whether partici- pants with poorer auditory filtering abilities exhibited particularly weak neural responses to OON heard in a multispeaker setting. Our primary finding was that TDs and ASD-Vs, but not ASD-MLVs, had significant MMRs to OON in a multi- speaker setting, and strength of LPPs positively correlated with auditory filtering abilities in those with ASD. These find- ings reveal electrophysiological correlates of auditory filtering disruption within a clinical population that has severe language and communication impairments and offer a novel neuroimaging approach to studying the Cocktail Party effect in neurotypical and clinical populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Visual Stimuli Neighboring Attended Stimuli Suppressed In
    Linköping University | The Department of Computer Science Bachelor Thesis, 18 ECTS | Cognitive Science Spring 2016 | LIU-IDA/KOGVET-G--16/017—SE Is Visual Stimuli Neighboring Attended Stimuli Suppressed in High Perceptual Load? A Steady State Evoked Potential Study Kan visuellt distraktor-stimuli påverkas av perceptuell belastning? Author: Linn Maria Elisabeth Bergström Supervisor at Linköping University: Carine Signoret Supervisor at Stockholm University: Stefan Wiens Examinator, Linköping University: Rachel Ellis Linköpings universitet SE-581 83 Linköping 013-28 10 00, www.liu.se Is Visual Stimuli Neighboring Attended Stimuli Suppressed in High Perceptual Load? Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]