The Spatial Pattern of Farming and Factors Influencing It During The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Spatial Pattern of Farming and Factors Influencing It During The Science Bulletin 62 (2017) 1565–1568 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Science Bulletin journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scib Short Communication The spatial pattern of farming and factors influencing it during the Peiligang culture period in the middle Yellow River valley, China ⇑ ⇑ Can Wang a, , Houyuan Lu a,b,c, , Wanfa Gu d, Naiqin Wu a,c, Jianping Zhang a,b, Xinxin Zuo a, Fengjiang Li a, Daojing Wang a, Yajie Dong a, Songzhi Wang d, Yanfeng Liu d, Yingjian Bao e, Yayi Hu d a Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China b Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China d Zhengzhou Municipal Institute of Archaeology, Zhengzhou 450052, China e The School of History and Culture, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China article info abstract Article history: Received 27 August 2017 Ó 2017 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved. Received in revised form 27 September 2017 Accepted 8 October 2017 Available online 12 October 2017 The Peiligang culture (ca. 7000–5000 cal BC) is the earliest Neo- To date, more than 120 Peiligang culture sites have been iden- lithic culture in the middle Yellow River valley and represents the tified, distributed over a large area of the middle Yellow River val- emergence of cereal farming in the region [1]. It has long been con- ley [4], but fewer than 20 sites have been excavated [5] and only 13 sidered representative of millet farming [2], which requires a dry sites had archaeobotanical data [3,4,6–8]. In this paper, in order to field, a certain amount of rainfall, and minimal crop management, answer the above question, on-the-spot investigations were car- but new records reveal that mixed farming of millet and rice (Oryza ried out at four sites of both types, and phytolith and plant sp.) took place during this period [3]. Therefore, it is possible that macroremain analyses were conducted on samples to recover the millet farming coexisted with mixed farming in the Peiligang cul- cultivated crop assemblages. In addition, published archaeobotan- ture rather than one or the other. The environmental conditions ical data were integrated to reveal crop remains in different Peili- required for mixed farming should be different from those required gang culture sites. Our study attempts to find the differences in for millet farming, because rice generally requires more soil mois- crop cultivation in the two types of sites and, finally, reconstruct ture and nutrients than millet. Thus, there is a need to know how the spatial pattern of agriculture in the middle Yellow River valley these agricultural modes were distributed in these sites and what during the Peiligang culture period. the influencing environmental factors were. However, crop assem- Four representative Peiligang culture sites, namely Wuluoxipo blages from the different Peiligang culture sites have rarely been (113°001400E, 34°3802000N), Zhuangling (113°804600E, 34°4901900N), comparatively studied previously; therefore, the spatial distribu- Lijiagou (113°3102600E, 34°3305400N), and Zhuzhai (113°3001900E, tion patterns of millet and mixed farming are still unknown. 34°4903100N) were investigated in a 2012 survey. Wuluoxipo, In terms of their geographical locations, Peiligang culture sites Zhuangling, and Lijiagou are located in hilly lands with higher ele- are classified into two types: those on the alluvial plains and those vation (178–275 m) and smaller area (2–3 ha), while Zhuzhai is on the hilly lands [1]. Sites of the former type are generally large, located in alluvial plains with lower elevation (105 m) and larger with thick cultural deposits and rich artifacts, while sites of the lat- area (10 ha) (Table S1). Archaeobotanical data from the other nine ter type are small, with thin deposits and fewer remains. These Peiligang culture sites were also collected. Geographic information contrasting traits may reflect different adaptive subsistence strate- on all thirteen sites is listed in Table S1. Fig. 1(a) also shows the gies [1]. Therefore, the question arises as to whether these two geographical locations of these sites. The thirteen sites are dis- types performed different agricultural modes to adapt to different tributed in the Luoyang, Zhengzhou, and Xuchang cities in the natural circumstances. northern Henan Province. Nine phytolith samples and two floatation samples (15 L) were ⇑ Corresponding authors. collected from one ash pit (WLXPH1) at Wuluoxipo, twenty-four E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C. Wang), [email protected]. samples for phytolith analysis were collected from three ash pits ac.cn (H. Lu). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2017.10.003 2095-9273/Ó 2017 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved. 1566 C. Wang et al. / Science Bulletin 62 (2017) 1565–1568 Fig. 1. (a) Locations of the Peiligang culture sites discussed in the text. 1. Zhaigen; 2. Bangou; 3. Fudian; 4. Wuluoxipo; 5. Zhuangling; 6. Zhuzhai; 7. Shawoli; 8. Lijiagou; 9. Egou; 10. Peiligang; 11. Gangshi; 12. Tanghu; 13. Shigu. (b) Relative percentage of phytolith from common millet, foxtail millet, and rice at different sites. The H92 data of the Tanghu site are adapted from Zhang et al. [3]. (ZL-2, ZL-3, and ZL-4) at Zhuangling, one phytolith sample (LJG2) treating with 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 10% cold was collected from the Peiligang cultural layer at Lijiagou, and hydrochloric acid (HCl), separating it with a zinc bromide (ZnBr2, twelve phytolith samples and four floatation samples (30 L) were density 2.35 g/cm3) heavy liquid, and mounting it on a slide with collected from twelve ash pits at Zhuzhai. neutral resin and fixing a glass cover over it. Phytolith identifica- The wet oxidation method was used to extract phytoliths from tion, counting, and photographing was conducted using a Leica the soil. The procedure consisted of weighing out 2 g of soil, then DM750 light microscope at 400Â magnification. More than 400 C. Wang et al. / Science Bulletin 62 (2017) 1565–1568 1567 phytoliths were counted in each sample. Identification was aided At Zhuangling, a total of 10,533 phytoliths were encountered in by the use of reference materials and published keys for millet twenty-four samples, all of which contained crop phytoliths. In and rice phytoliths [9]. Phytolith abundance was expressed as a these samples, 376 phytoliths from common millet husks (g-type: percentage of all phytoliths counted. Fig. S1c) and 63 phytoliths from foxtail millet husks (X-type: All the floatation samples were floated by bucket with a 0.2 mm Fig. S1f) were found. The common millet phytoliths were dominant mesh screen. After drying, the light fraction samples were sifted in in all the samples, with the highest percentage reaching 13.94%, sample sieves (2, 1, 0.7, and 0.5 mm), and the <0.5 mm fractions while that of foxtail millet was 1.60%. were excluded because no charred seeds were found in these tiny At Lijiagou, a total of 436 phytoliths were identified from the remains. The remaining samples were sorted under a Leica L2 one sample (LJG2) that contained one phytolith from common mil- binocular stereomicroscope. Charred seeds, fruits, and plant let husks (g-type: Fig. S1b). The percentage of common millet phy- remains were removed from charcoal and stored in plastic tubes. tolith was 0.23%. We observed another slide from this sample and The identification of the charred remains was performed by found 3 pieces of common millet husks. Phytoliths of other crops Changjiang Liu at the State Key Laboratory of Systematic and were not found. Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany CAS. At Zhuzhai, a total of 5845 phytoliths were counted from twelve A total of nine samples were selected for AMS radiocarbon dat- samples, of which nine samples contained crop phytoliths. Present ing. The dating materials were mostly charcoal, except for two in these samples were 448 pieces of common millet husks (g-type: samples from Zhuangling and Wuluoxipo respectively, which were Fig. S1d), 32 rice phytoliths (including 29 double-peaks and 3 rice phytoliths. The phytoliths were extracted by Xinxin Zuo following bulliforms) (Fig. S1h, i), and 4 pieces of foxtail millet husks (X- an improved method described in Zuo et al. [10] and the purity of type: Fig. S1g). The highest percentage of common millet was the extracted phytoliths has been proven to be reliable for dating 40%, while the highest percentages of rice and foxtail millet were [10]. The nine AMS dates obtained from the four analyzed sites 5% and 0.6%, respectively. A total of 64 charred plant remains were are shown in Table S2. The ages cover the time interval 6417– found in four samples, with a density of 2.1 grains/L on average. 5226 cal BC (95.4% range), which is consistent with the Peiligang The crops were present in low quantities, including five grains of cultural period. common millet (Fig. S2b), six grains of foxtail millet (Fig. S2c), At Wuluoxipo, a total of 3868 phytoliths were counted from and one grain of rice (Fig. S2d), making up a small proportion of nine samples in WLXPH1, of which three samples (60–70, 70–80, all the charred remains (18.75%). and 80–90 cm) contained crop phytoliths, including 7 pieces of Fig. 1(b) shows the relative percentage of crop phytoliths in the common millet (Panicum miliaceum) husks (g-type: Fig. S1(a)) four analyzed sites and the Tanghu site [3]. According to the differ- and 4 pieces of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) husks (X-type: ences in the crop species found, these sites can be grouped into two Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Fermented Beverages of Pre- and Proto-Historic China
    Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China Patrick E. McGovern*†, Juzhong Zhang‡, Jigen Tang§, Zhiqing Zhang¶, Gretchen R. Hall*, Robert A. Moreauʈ, Alberto Nun˜ ezʈ, Eric D. Butrym**, Michael P. Richards††, Chen-shan Wang*, Guangsheng Cheng‡‡, Zhijun Zhao§, and Changsui Wang‡ *Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology (MASCA), University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, PA 19104; ‡Department of Scientific History and Archaeometry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China; §Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100710, China; ¶Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450000, China; ʈEastern Regional Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wyndmoor, PA 19038; **Firmenich Corporation, Princeton, NJ 08543; ††Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; and ‡‡Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10080, China Communicated by Ofer Bar-Yosef, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, November 16, 2004 (received for review September 30, 2003) Chemical analyses of ancient organics absorbed into pottery jars A much earlier history for fermented beverages in China has long from the early Neolithic village of Jiahu in Henan province in China been hypothesized based on the similar shapes and styles of have revealed that a mixed fermented beverage of rice, honey, and Neolithic pottery vessels to the magnificent Shang Dynasty bronze fruit (hawthorn fruit and͞or grape) was being produced as early as vessels (8), which were used to present, store, serve, drink, and the seventh millennium before Christ (B.C.). This prehistoric drink ritually present fermented beverages during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: the Disparity Between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 175 December, 2006 The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: The Disparity between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation by Zhou Jixu Center for East Asian Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Chinese Department, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns, Chiefdom Variability, and the Development of Early States in North China
    JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY 15, 237±288 (1996) ARTICLE NO. 0010 Settlement Patterns, Chiefdom Variability, and the Development of Early States in North China LI LIU School of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia Received June 12, 1995; revision received May 17, 1996; accepted May 26, 1996 In the third millennium B.C., the Longshan culture in the Central Plains of northern China was the crucial matrix in which the ®rst states evolved from the basis of earlier Neolithic societies. By adopting the theoretical concept of the chiefdom and by employing the methods of settlement archaeology, especially regional settlement hierarchy and rank-size analysis, this paper introduces a new approach to research on the Longshan culture and to inquiring about the development of the early states in China. Three models of regional settlement pattern correlating to different types of chiefdom systems are identi®ed. These are: (1) the centripetal regional system in circumscribed regions representing the most complex chiefdom organizations, (2) the centrifugal regional system in semi-circumscribed regions indicating less integrated chiefdom organization, and (3) the decentral- ized regional system in noncircumscribed regions implying competing and the least complex chief- dom organizations. Both external and internal factors, including geographical condition, climatic ¯uctuation, Yellow River's changing course, population movement, and intergroup con¯ict, played important roles in the development of complex societies in the Longshan culture. As in many cultures in other parts of the world, the early states in China emerged from a system of competing chiefdoms, which was characterized by intensive intergroup con¯ict and frequent shifting of political centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Anthropology Summer 2017 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications Shengqian Chen Renmin University of China Pei-Lin Yu Boise State University This document was originally published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Anthropological Research. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1086/692104 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications SHENGQIAN CHEN, School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872 PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA. Email: [email protected] The growth and significance of scientific research into the origins of agriculture in China calls for fresh examination at scales large enough to facilitate explanation of cultural evolutionary processes. The Paleolithic to Neolithic transition (PNT) is not yet well-understood because most archaeo- logical research on early agriculture cites data from the more conspicuous and common early Neo- lithic sites. In this, the first of two papers, we synthesize a broad range of early Neolithic archae- ological data, including diagnostic artifacts, settlement patterns, site structure, and biological remains, to consider agriculture as a system-level adaptive phenomenon. Although farming by this period was already well-established in much of North China and the middle Yangtze River basin, echoes of the foraging past can be found in the persistence of hunting-related artifacts in North China’s Loess Plateau and aquatic-based intensification and vegeculture in South China. Our analysis of the growing body of Chinese data and projections using Binford’s hunting and gathering database indicate that agriculture was differentially developed, adopted, or resisted by foragers according to measurable, predictable initial conditions of habitat that influenced diet breadth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence of Cereal Cultivation in China
    The Occurrence of Cereal Cultivation in China TRACEY L-D LU NEARL Y EIGHTY YEARS HAVE ELAPSED since Swedish scholar J. G. Andersson discovered a piece of rice husk on a Yangshao potsherd found in the middle Yel­ low River Valley in 1927 (Andersson 1929). Today, many scholars agree that China 1 is one of the centers for an indigenous origin of agriculture, with broom­ corn and foxtail millets and rice being the major domesticated crops (e.g., Craw-· ford 2005; Diamond and Bellwood 2003; Higham 1995; Smith 1995) and dog and pig as the primary animal domesticates (Yuan 2001). It is not clear whether chicken and water buffalo were also indigenously domesticated in China (Liu 2004; Yuan 2001). The origin of agriculture in China by no later than 9000 years ago is an impor­ tant issue in prehistoric archaeology. Agriculture is the foundation of Chinese civ­ ilization. Further, the expansion of agriculture in Asia might have related to the origin and dispersal of the Austronesian and Austroasiatic speakers (e.g., Bellwood 2005; Diamond and Bellwood 2003; Glover and Higham 1995; Tsang 2005). Thus the issue is essential for our understanding of Asian and Pacific prehistory and the origins of agriculture in the world. Many scholars have discussed various aspects regarding the origin of agriculture in China, particularly after the 1960s (e.g., Bellwood 1996, 2005; Bellwood and Renfrew 2003; Chen 1991; Chinese Academy of Agronomy 1986; Crawford 1992, 2005; Crawford and Shen 1998; Flannery 1973; Higham 1995; Higham and Lu 1998; Ho 1969; Li and Lu 1981; Lu 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002; MacN eish et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Dispersal of Early Domestic Pigs in Northern China
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Origin and dispersal of early domestic pigs in northern China Hai Xiang1,2, Jianqiang Gao3, Dawei Cai4, Yunbing Luo5, Baoquan Yu6, Langqing Liu1, Ranran Liu7, Hui Zhou4, Xiaoyong Chen8, Weitao Dun8, Xi Wang9, Michael Hofreiter10 & Xingbo Zhao1 Received: 16 February 2017 It is widely accepted that modern pigs were domesticated independently at least twice, and Chinese Accepted: 7 June 2017 native pigs are deemed as direct descendants of the first domesticated pigs in the corresponding Published: xx xx xxxx domestication centers. By analyzing mitochondrial DNA sequences of an extensive sample set spanning 10,000 years, we find that the earliest pigs from the middle Yellow River region already carried the maternal lineages that are dominant in both younger archaeological populations and modern Chinese pigs. Our data set also supports early Neolithic pig utilization and a long-term in situ origin for northeastern Chinese pigs during 8,000–3,500 BP, suggesting a possibly independent domestication in northeast China. Additionally, we observe a genetic replacement in ancient northeast Chinese pigs since 3,500 BP. The results not only provide increasing evidence for pig origin in the middle Yellow River region but also depict an outline for the process of early pig domestication in northeast China. It is widely accepted that pigs were domesticated independently in Near East and East Asia beginning ~10,000 years ago after Sus sp. emerged in Southeast Asia during the climatic fluctuations of the early Pliocene 5.3–3.5 My ago1–3. So far, at least six phylogeographically distinct wild boar lineages have been found to have contributed to the present domestic pig populations4.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Craft Specialization And
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Craft Specialization and Animal Products at the Longshan Period Sites of Taosi and Zhoujiazhuang, Shanxi Province, China A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Katherine Richards Brunson 2015 ©Copyright by Katherine Richards Brunson 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Craft Specialization and Animal Products at the Longshan Period Sites of Taosi and Zhoujiazhuang, Shanxi Province, China by Katherine Richards Brunson Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Paul Jeffrey Brantingham, Chair The late third millennium BCE was a period of technological and cultural change in China’s Yellow River valley. Domestic cattle and sheep were introduced into China from West Asia during this period, marking a shift in the zooarchaeological record and the arrival of new methods of animal exploitation. Using zooarchaeological evidence for the exploitation of secondary products and bone working at the Late Neolithic Longshan period sites of Taosi and Zhoujiazhuang in Shanxi Province, I examine the relationship between animal products, craft specialization, and increasing social complexity. My research suggests that non-subsistence uses of cattle and sheep were important factors that contributed to the adoption of herding in the Central Plains region, and that the nature of cattle and sheep exploitation varied between sites depending on local environmental and cultural conditions. Additionally, I use ancient DNA analysis to identify bovine oracle bones from Taosi and Zhoujiazhuang. Both domestic cattle and wild aurochs scapulas were used in divination rituals, raising the possibility that people ii experimented with managing native East Asian wild aurochs alongside domestic cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neolithic Ofsouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal
    The Neolithic ofSouthern China-Origin, Development, and Dispersal ZHANG CHI AND HSIAO-CHUN HUNG INTRODUCTION SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE YELLOW RIVER and Mainland Southeast Asia, southern China1 lies centrally within eastern Asia. This geographical area can be divided into three geomorphological terrains: the middle and lower Yangtze allu­ vial plain, the Lingnan (southern Nanling Mountains)-Fujian region,2 and the Yungui Plateau3 (Fig. 1). During the past 30 years, abundant archaeological dis­ coveries have stimulated a rethinking of the role ofsouthern China in the prehis­ tory of China and Southeast Asia. This article aims to outline briefly the Neolithic cultural developments in the middle and lower Yangtze alluvial plain, to discuss cultural influences over adjacent regions and, most importantly, to examine the issue of southward population dispersal during this time period. First, we give an overview of some significant prehistoric discoveries in south­ ern China. With the discovery of Hemudu in the mid-1970s as the divide, the history of archaeology in this region can be divided into two phases. The first phase (c. 1920s-1970s) involved extensive discovery, when archaeologists un­ earthed Pleistocene human remains at Yuanmou, Ziyang, Liujiang, Maba, and Changyang, and Palaeolithic industries in many caves. The major Neolithic cul­ tures, including Daxi, Qujialing, Shijiahe, Majiabang, Songze, Liangzhu, and Beiyinyangying in the middle and lower Yangtze, and several shell midden sites in Lingnan, were also discovered in this phase. During the systematic research phase (1970s to the present), ongoing major ex­ cavation at many sites contributed significantly to our understanding of prehis­ toric southern China. Additional early human remains at Wushan, Jianshi, Yun­ xian, Nanjing, and Hexian were recovered together with Palaeolithic assemblages from Yuanmou, the Baise basin, Jianshi Longgu cave, Hanzhong, the Li and Yuan valleys, Dadong and Jigongshan.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquity Lijiagou and the Earliest Pottery in Henan Province, China
    Antiquity http://journals.cambridge.org/AQY Additional services for Antiquity: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Lijiagou and the earliest pottery in Henan Province, China Youping Wang, Songlin Zhang, Wanfa Gu, Songzhi Wang, Jianing He, Xiaohong Wu, Tongli Qu, Jingfang Zhao, Youcheng Chen and Ofer Bar-Yosef Antiquity / Volume 89 / Issue 344 / April 2015, pp 273 - 291 DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2015.2, Published online: 08 April 2015 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0003598X15000022 How to cite this article: Youping Wang, Songlin Zhang, Wanfa Gu, Songzhi Wang, Jianing He, Xiaohong Wu, Tongli Qu, Jingfang Zhao, Youcheng Chen and Ofer Bar-Yosef (2015). Lijiagou and the earliest pottery in Henan Province, China. Antiquity, 89, pp 273-291 doi:10.15184/aqy.2015.2 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/AQY, IP address: 129.234.252.65 on 09 Apr 2015 Lijiagou and the earliest pottery in Henan Province, China Youping Wang 1,∗, Songlin Zhang2,WanfaGu2, Songzhi Wang2, Jianing He1, Xiaohong Wu1, Tongli Qu1, Jingfang Zhao1, Youcheng Chen1 & Ofer Bar-Yosef3 Research 0 km 2000 It has long been believed that the earliest ceramics in the central plain of China N were produced by the Neolithic cultures of Jiahu 1 and Peiligang. Excavations at Lijiagou in Henan Province, dating to Beijing the ninth millennium BC, have, however, revealed evidence for the earlier production Lijiagou of pottery, probably on the eve of millet and wild rice cultivation in northern and southern China respectively. It is assumed that,asinotherregionssuchassouth- west Asia and South America, sedentism preceded incipient cultivation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Pig Domestication in Eurasia
    The Archaeology of Pig Domestication in Eurasia The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Price, Max and Hitomi Hongo. "The Archaeology of Pig Domestication in Eurasia." Journal of Archaeological Research 28, 4 (December 2019): 557–615 © 2019 Springer Science Business Media, LLC As Published https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-019-09142-9 Publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128524 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. AUTHOR ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The Archaeology of Pig Domestication in Eurasia Cite this article as: Max Price and Hitomi Hongo, The Archaeology of Pig Domestication in Eurasia, Journal of Archaeological Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-019-09142-9 This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version. Terms of use and reuse: academic research for non-commercial purposes, see here for full terms. https://www.springer.com/aam-terms-v1 Author accepted manuscript © 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. AUTHOR ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The Archaeology of Pig
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 5 Early Agriculture in Different Regions*
    UNIT 5 EARLY AGRICULTURE IN DIFFERENT REGIONS* Structure 5.1 Objectives 5.2 Introduction 5.3 Beginning of Agriculture in West Asia 5.3.1 Beidha and Jericho 5.3.2 Zagros Mountains in Iran and Iraq 5.4 Evidence from Anatolia and Europe 5.5 Mesoamerica and China 5.6 Summary 5.7 Key Words 5.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 5.9 Suggested Readings 5.10 Instructional Video Recommendations 5.1 OBJECTIVES In this Unit, we will discuss the beginning of agriculture and early agricultural practices in different parts of the world. After reading this Unit, you should be able to: Identify the regions which experienced the early emergence of agriculture; Explain the factors that led to the diversity in the nature of agricultural practices in different regions; and Understand the importance of the development of agriculture alongside foraging and nomadism. 5.2 INTRODUCTION The transition to farming and stock-raising was very crucial for the social and economic organization of human communities. Agriculture did revolutionize human existence particularly because now there was greater possibility of a storable surplus to meet the demand of growing numbers and to serve as an emergency buffer. However, hunting and gathering and a mobile way of life was not given up entirely and continued to serve the subsistence needs of communities in many parts of the world. Several scholars have contested the description of beginning of agriculture as representing a Neolithic Revolution, particularly when the term is used to describe the suddenness and abruptness of change. However, there is wide agreement about the revolutionary significance of agriculture in terms of its impact on subsistence existence and settlement pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioarcheology of China
    Chapter 3 Bioarchaeology of China: Bridging Biological and Archaeological Inquiries Elizabeth Berger and Kate Pechenkina In China, anthropology (人类学 renleixue, literally “study of humanity”) is primar- ily used to refer to physical anthropology. Biological or physical anthropology is firmly situated within the biological disciplines, whereas archaeology is tradition- ally hosted by history departments. Consequent differences in research interests and approaches between archaeologists and biological anthropologists have influenced the development of the field. Research on archaeological human skeletons, and anthropology as a whole, in China can be divided into three historical phases: (1) the late 1800s to 1949, the formative period, when anthropology in China was practiced as a holistic discipline and biological anthropology research was dominated by comparative morphomet- rics, population history, and paleoanthropology; (2) 1949 to the early 1980s, when “anthropology” referred almost exclusively to physical anthropology, and morpho- metrics and paleoanthropology were independent of archaeology; and (3) the 1980s until today, when cultural anthropology has experienced a renewal and bioarchaeol- ogy has come to integrate the skeletal and archaeological records (Zhang 2012; Zhu 2004; Hu 2006; Guldin 1994). In its early years (before 1949), Chinese anthropology was in close communica- tion with American, British, and European scholarship. However, it also draws from a long tradition of Chinese historiography, antiquarianism, and medical stud- ies and has undergone more than 100 years of development within China to become a discipline with its own research foci and disciplinary boundaries (Guldin 1994; Hu 2006). E. Berger Lieberthal-Rogel Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2018.
    [Show full text]