Covenant Laboratory Microbiology Specimen Guidlines
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Laboratory Manual for Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted And
Department of AIDS Control LaborLaboraattororyy ManualManual fforor DiagnosisDiagnosis ofof SeSexxuallyually TTrransmitansmittteded andand RRepreproductivoductivee TTrractact InInffectionsections FOREWORD Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and Reproductive Tract Infections (RTIs) are diseases of major global concern. About 6% of Indian population is reported to be having STIs. In addition to having high levels of morbidity, they also facilitate transmission of HIV infection. Thus control of STIs goes hand in hand with control of HIV/AIDS. Countrywide strengthening of laboratories by helping them to adopt uniform standardized protocols is very important not only for case detection and treatment, but also to have reliable epidemiological information which will help in evaluation and monitoring of control efforts. It is also essential to have good referral services between primary level of health facilities and higher levels. This manual aims to bring in standard testing practices among laboratories that serve health facilities involved in managing STIs and RTIs. While generic procedures such as staining, microscopy and culture have been dealt with in detail, procedures that employ specific manufacturer defined kits have been left to the laboratories to follow the respective protocols. An introduction to quality system essentials and quality control principles has also been included in the manual to sensitize the readers on the importance of quality assurance and quality management system, which is very much the need of the hour. Manual of Operating Procedures for Diagnosis of STIs/RTIs i PREFACE Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) are the most common infectious diseases worldwide, with over 350 million new cases occurring each year, and have far-reaching health, social, and economic consequences. -
BBL Group a Selective Strep Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (Ssa )
BBL™ Group A Selective Strep Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (ssA™) and ! BBL™ Trypticase™ Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (TSA II)–Bi-Plate " L007379 • Rev. 09 • December 2006 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES I INTRODUCTION Group A Selective Strep Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (ssA) is a selective medium for use in the isolation and presumptive identification of group A streptococci from throat cultures and other specimens. Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (TSA II) is used for the growth of fastidious organisms and for the visualization of hemolytic reactions. The TSA II medium sector is marked "I" and the ssA medium sector is marked "II" in the bi-plate dish. II PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURE A. Group A Selective Strep Agar with 5% Sheep Blood 1. Inoculate representative samples with the cultures diluted to contain 103–104 CFU/0.01 mL. a. To each plate, add 0.01 mL of the dilution and streak for isolation. Make a stab in the primary streak area before streaking the rest of the plate. b. Place a Taxo™ A disc at the intersection of the first and second area of streaking on all plates inoculated with S. pyogenes strains. c. Incubate plates at 35 ± 2°C in an aerobic atmosphere supplemented with carbon dioxide. d. Include Trypticase Soy Agar with 5% Sheep Blood (TSA II) plates as nonselective controls for all organisms. 2. Examine plates after 18–24 h for beta hemolysis in the stabbed area and for amount of growth, inhibition, colony size and hemolytic reactions. Read and record the size of the zone around the Taxo A disc with S. -
Comparison of Throat Culture and Latex Agglutination Test for Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Comparison of Throat Culture and Latex Agglutination Test for Streptococcal Pharyngitis Paul M. Fischer, MD, and Pamela L. Mentrup, MLT Augusta, Georgia Numerous reports have recently appeared in the clinical microbiology litera ture that describe agglutination tests for identifying patients with group A streptococcal pharyngitis. These studies have indicated a close correlation between the results of the agglutination tests and traditional throat culturing. This paper describes a comparison study of 100 consecutive throat swab specimens using a commercially available agglutination test and routine throat culturing. The cultures were interpreted by an individual who was blinded to the agglutination test results. All agglutination testing was done by two laboratory members of a family practice office staff. The agglutination procedure was easy to perform and clear to interpret. The test sensitivity and specificity compared well with that reported in the literature from microbiol ogy laboratories. The new agglutination tests are useful in the office labora tory for the identification of group A streptococci. Their primary advantage compared with throat culturing is the rapid availability of test results. Most clinicians recognize the need to differ An additional problem with throat culturing has entiate group A streptococcal pharyngitis from been that clinicians are uncomfortable with the other infectious causes of pharyngitis because of 24- to 48-hour test time. Inconsistent patterns of the reduction in suppurative sequelae and clinical practice have therefore developed, includ rheumatic fever when streptococcal pharyngitis is ing waiting for the culture results before treating, treated with antibiotics.1 New evidence has also prescribing penicillin to all patients until the re supported the intuitive feeling of some clinicians sults are available, or treating all patients without that early antibiotic treatment will decrease the confirming the diagnosis by culture. -
Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Streptococcus Genus And
Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases ISSN: 2345-5349 eISSN: 2345-5330 Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Streptococcus Genus and Other Pathogens Isolated from Throat Culture Samples of Patients in Fatemeh Al- Zahra Hospital of Sari, Iran 1 2* 3 1 Mohsen Nazari , Mohammad Taha Ebrahimi , Niloofar Mobarezpour , Amin Sepehr 1Department of Bacteriology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran; 2Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 3PPD Tuberculin Department, Razi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute, Karaj, Iran A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Original Article Introduction: Tracheal tubes are among the primary means of infection transmission in hospitals. Therefore, identifying microbial agents transmitted via this route is necessary to control and prevent these infections. This study aimed Keywords: Antibiotic Resistance pattern, Tracheal Tube, Streptococcal to investigate the prevalence of pharyngeal-contaminating microorganisms and species their antibiotic resistance pattern. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used 117 pharyngeal swabs samples obtained from patients referred to Fatemeh Zahra Hospital of Sari, Iran, in 2018. The Samples were obtained using the Received: 15 Jul. 2020 sterile cotton swab from the throat and then cultured in the sheep blood agar. Received in revised form: 26 Jan. 2021 The positive colonies for the alpha-hemolytic test were subcultured on the Accepted: 26 Jan. 2021 Mueller-Hinton agar for further assays, including the susceptibility to optochin, DOI: 10.29252/JoMMID.8.4.143 catalase test, Gram's polychromatic stain, microscopic examination, pyrrolidonyl aminopeptidase (PYR) test, sensitization to bacitracin, and latex agglutination *Correspondence assay. -
Update Antibiotics: Why and Why Not to 2018
Antibiotics Why and Why Not 2018 Academic Detailing Service Planning committee Content Experts Clinical reviewers Paul Bonnar MD FRCPC, Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Disease, Dalhousie University, Medical Director, NSHA Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Jeannette Comeau MD MSc FRCPC FAAP, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Consultant, Assistant Professor, Dalhousie University, Medical Director, Infection Prevention and Control, Medical Lead, Antibiotic Stewardship IWK Health Centre Ian Davis MD CCFP FRCPC, Assistant Professor Divisions of Infectious Disease and Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University Lynn Johnston MD MSc FRCPC, Professor Division of Infectious Disease, Dalhousie University Valerie Murphy BScPharm ACPR Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Central Zone Tasha Ramsey BScPharm, ACPR, PharmD, Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine Clinical Coordinator, Pharmacy Department, Nova Scotia Health Authority Kathy Slayter BScPharm, Pharm D, FCSHP, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Antimicrobial Stewardship/Infectious Diseases, Adjunct Assistant Professor Faculty of Medicine; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Faculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie University, Canadian Center for Vaccinology Drug evaluation pharmacists Jennifer Fleming BScPharm ACPR Drug Evaluation Unit, Nova Scotia Health Kim Kelly BScPharm, Drug Evaluation Unit, Nova Scotia Health (retired) Family Physician Advisory Panel -
Microbiology Specimen Collection
Martin Health System Stuart, Florida Laboratory Services Microbiology Specimen Collection The recovery of pathogenic organisms responsible for an infectious process is dependent on proper collection and transportation of a specimen. An improperly collected or transported specimen may lead to failure to isolate the causative organism(s) of an infectious disease or may result in the recovery and subsequent treatment of contaminating organisms. Improper handling of specimens may also lead to accidental exposure to infectious material. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTION: 1. Follow universal precaution guidelines, treating all specimens as potentially hazardous. 2. Whenever possible, collect specimen before antibiotics are administered. 3. Collect the specimen from the actual site of infection, avoiding contamination from adjacent tissues or secretions. 4. Collect the specimen at optimal time i.e. Early morning sputum for AFB First voided specimen for urine culture Specimens ordered x 3 should be 24 hours apart (exception: Blood cultures which are collected as indicated by the physician) 5. Collect sufficient quantity of material for tests requested. 6. Use appropriate collection and transport container. Refer to the Microbiology Quick Reference Chart or to the specific source guidelines. Containers should always be tightly sealed and leak-proof 7. Label the specimen with the Patient’s First and Last Name Date of Birth Collection Date and Time Collector’s First and Last Name Source 8. Submit specimen in the sealed portion of a Biohazard specimen bag. 9. Place signed laboratory order in the outside pocket of the specimen bag. 10. Include any pertinent information i.e. recent travel or relocation, previous antibiotic therapy, unusual suspected organisms, method or environment of wound infliction 11. -
Blood Cultures - Aerobic & Anaerobic
Blood Cultures - Aerobic & Anaerobic Blood cultures are drawn into special bottles that contain a special medium that will support the growth and allow the detection of micro- organisms that prefer oxygen (aerobes) or that thrive in a reduced-oxygen environment (anaerobes). Multiple samples are usually collected. Routine standard of care indicates a minimum of Two Separate Sites or collected At Least 15 Minutes Apart. Multiple Collection/Multiple Site collection is done to aid in the detection of micro-organism s present in small numbers and/or may be released into the bloodstream intermittently. Samples must be incubated for several days before resulting to ensure that the sample is indeed negative before resulting out. Synergy Laboratories uses state of the art automated instrumentation that provides continuous monitoring. This allows for more rapid detection of samples that do contain bacteria or yeast. CONSIDER AEROBIC CONSIDER ANAEROBIC BLOOD CULTURES IN: BLOOD CULTURES IN: 1) New onset of fever, change in pattern of fever or unexplained clinical 1) Intra-abdominal infection instability. 2) Hemodynamic instability with or without fever if infection is a 2) Sepsis/septic shock from GI site possibility. 3) Necrotizing fasciitis or complicated 3) Possible endocarditis or graft infection. skin/soft tissue infection. 4) Unexplained hyperglycemia or 4) Severe oropharyngeal or dental hypotension. infection. 5) To assess cure of bacteremia. 5) Lung abscess or cavitary lesion. 6) Presence of a vascular catheter and 6) Massive blunt abdominal trauma. clinical instability. Body Fluid Specimens Selection Collect the specimen using strict aseptic technique. The patient should be fasting. If only one tube of fluid is available, the microbiology laboratory gets it first. -
Department of Microbiology Quality Manual Policy # MI GEN Page 1 of 36 Version: 1.5 CURRENT Section: Bacteriology Procedures Su
Policy # MI_GEN Page 1 of 36 Department of Microbiology Quality Manual Version: 1.5 CURRENT Section: Bacteriology Procedures Subject Title: Genital Tract Culture Manual Prepared by QA Committee Issued by: Laboratory Manager Revision Date: 7/14/2021 Approved by Laboratory Director: Next Review Date: 7/14/2023 Microbiologist-in-Chief Uncontrolled When Printed TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 LOWER GENITAL TRACT ............................................................................................................ 4 CERVICAL (ENDOCERVICAL) SWAB .............................................................................. 4 GROUP B STREPTOCOCCUS SCREEN ............................................................................. 7 VAGINITIS SCREEN ............................................................................................................ 10 VAGINAL CULTURE ........................................................................................................... 14 URETHRAL SWAB .............................................................................................................. 18 PENIS SWAB ......................................................................................................................... 20 SEMINAL FLUID .................................................................................................................. 23 UPPER GENITAL TRACT CULTURE ....................................................................................... -
Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections, Including Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus human immunodeficiency including Laboratory transmitted infections, diagnosis of sexually Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus Editor-in-Chief Magnus Unemo Editors Ronald Ballard, Catherine Ison, David Lewis, Francis Ndowa, Rosanna Peeling For more information, please contact: Department of Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland ISBN 978 92 4 150584 0 Fax: +41 22 791 4171 E-mail: [email protected] www.who.int/reproductivehealth 7892419 505840 WHO_STI-HIV_lab_manual_cover_final_spread_revised.indd 1 02/07/2013 14:45 Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus Editor-in-Chief Magnus Unemo Editors Ronald Ballard Catherine Ison David Lewis Francis Ndowa Rosanna Peeling WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus / edited by Magnus Unemo … [et al]. 1.Sexually transmitted diseases – diagnosis. 2.HIV infections – diagnosis. 3.Diagnostic techniques and procedures. 4.Laboratories. I.Unemo, Magnus. II.Ballard, Ronald. III.Ison, Catherine. IV.Lewis, David. V.Ndowa, Francis. VI.Peeling, Rosanna. VII.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150584 0 (NLM classification: WC 503.1) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). -
Antibiotic Susceptibility Evaluation of Group a Streptococcus Isolated
Original Article Infection & http://dx.doi.org/10.3947/ic.2015.47.4.225 Infect Chemother 2015;47(4):225-230 Chemotherapy ISSN 2093-2340 (Print) · ISSN 2092-6448 (Online) Antibiotic Susceptibility Evaluation of Group A Streptococcus Isolated from Children with Pharyngitis: A Study from Iran Shirin Sayyahfar1, Alireza Fahimzad2, Amir Naddaf3, and Sara Tavassoli4 1Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Departement of Pediatrics, Ali Asghar Children Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Departement of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Research Center, Mofid Children Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran; 3Department of Pediatrics, Fasa University of Medical sciences, Fasa; 4Traditional Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility of Group A streptococcus (GAS) to antibiotics usually used in Iran for treatment of GAS pharyngitis in children. Materials and Methods: From 2011 to 2013, children 3-15 years of age with acute tonsillopharyngitis who attended Mofid Children’s Hospital clinics and emergency ward and did not meet the exclusion criteria were enrolled in a prospective study in a sequential manner. The isolates strains from throat culture were identified as GAS by colony morphology, gram staining, beta hemolysis on blood agar, sensitivity to bacitracin, a positive pyrrolidonyl aminopeptidase (PYR) test result, and the presence of Lancefield A antigen determined by agglutination test. Antimicrobial susceptibility was identified by both disk diffusion and broth dilution methods. Results: From 200 children enrolled in this study, 59 (30%) cases were culture positive for GAS. All isolates were sensitive to penicil- lin G. -
Section 9 Laboratory Consideration
Section 9 Laboratory Consideration 9. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 9-2 9.1 Overview and General Guidance ....................................................................................................... 9-2 Table 9-1: Overview of Laboratory Testing Locations, Specimens, and Methods for MTN-034 ............ 9-3 Table 9-2: Overview of Specimens for Storage and Shipment .............................................................. 9-4 Table 9-3: Overview of Laboratory Tests by visit for MTN-034 .............................................................. 9-4 9.2 Specimen Labeling............................................................................................................................. 9-5 9.3 Procedures for Specimens that cannot be evaluated ......................................................................... 9-5 9.4 Use of Laboratory Data and Management System (LDMS) ............................................................... 9-6 Figure 9-1: LDMS Entry Screen ............................................................................................................. 9-6 Table 9-4 LDMS Specimen Management Guide for MTN-034 Specimens ........................................... 9-7 Table 9-5 LDMS Codes ......................................................................................................................... 9-7 9.5 Urine Testing for Pregnancy, Dipstick Urinalysis, and Culture -
Treatment of Desquamative Inflammatory Vaginitis with Vitamin D: a Case Report
Treatment of Desquamative Inflammatory Vaginitis With Vitamin D: A Case Report Monica Peacocke, MD; Erin Djurkinak, RN; Susan Thys-Jacobs, MD Desquamative inflammatory vaginitis (DIV) is a discharge increases at ovulation and decreases just well-described but poorly understood vaginitis prior to menstruation. It can be malodorous, though associated with yellow vaginal discharge and the odor is not usually described as fishy. Examina- vulvovaginal pruritus, burning, and dyspareunia. tion of the discharge generally reveals an elevated pH Although etiologies of an inflammatory, infec- level (.4.5; reference range, 7.35–7.45), while the tious, and hormonal nature have been proposed, results of a vaginal wet mount reveal many polymor- response to therapy has been inconsistent and phonuclear leukocytes and vaginal epithelial cells. complete resolution of symptoms has been disap- Direct microscopy reveals the absence of normal pointing. We propose that DIV is a mucous mem- genital flora. Culture of discharge specimens most brane manifestation of vitamin D deficiency that commonly demonstrates group B streptococci; how- results in desquamation of the vaginal epithelium ever, other organisms also have been identified.1-3,5 and discharge. Moreover, we suggest that the It is intriguing to note that in a small subpopula- loss of this epithelium leads to altered vaginal pH tion of individuals, the purulent discharge grows no levels, mucous membrane fragility, inflammation, organisms at all—neither pathogenic organisms, such and secondary infection. Because vitamin D is a as the group B streptococci, nor normal lactobacilli. known transcriptional activator, we suggest that Initial therapy has included vaginal corticosteroids1 vitamin D is necessary for the synthesis of spe- and antibiotics such as clindamycin and cephalexin.5 cific vaginal structural proteins, such as cytokera- However, some individuals require hormone replace- tins.