DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image Library Partners for Australian Pollinators Image Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image Library Partners for Australian Pollinators Image Library 1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Ericrocis pintada Snelling & Zavortink, 1984 (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apinae: Ericrocidini) Common Name Tribe Representative - Ericrocidini Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pollinators/Pest/Main/139838 Image Library Australian Pollinators Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pollinators/ Partners for Australian Pollinators image library Western Australian Museum https://museum.wa.gov.au/ South Australian Museum https://www.samuseum.sa.gov.au/ Australian Museum https://australian.museum/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: Museum Victoria - [email protected] Author: Ken Walker Citation: Ken Walker (2010) Tribe Representative - Ericrocidini(Ericrocis pintada)Updated on 8/17/2010 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pollinators/Pest/Main/139838 2.3. Facets Bio-Region: USA and Canada, Central and South America Host Family: Not recorded Host Genera: Cleptoparasitic Status: Exotic Species not in Australia Bio-Regions: Nearctic, Neotropical, Greater and Lesser Antilles, Araucanian Body Hair and Scopal location: Scopa absent, Body hair relatively sparse Cleptoparasite: Yes - all species Episternal groove: Present but not extending below scrobal groove Wings: Submarginal cells - Three, Apex of marginal cell truncate or rounded, Hind wing with second abscissa of M + Cu shorter than oblique cu-v, Apically papillate Head - Structures: One subantennal suture below each antennal socket Head - Mouthparts: Galeal comb absent, Stipial comb present, Lorum V shaped; mentum tapered, Flabellum bipartite Legs: Middle tibial spur large, bifurcate or multidentate along its length, Middle coxa fully exposed, Arolia absent Male Genitalia: S7 broad, well developed and no apical lobes, Gonostyli short and broad, S7 broad and transverse Metasoma & Metanotum: Pygidial plate present Nests, Ovarioles & Immatures: Parasitic, Ovarioles per ovary equals 4 or more Larval provisions: Parasitic on other bees 2.4. Diagnostic Notes The subfamily Apinae consists of the corbiculate Apidae and taxa from the Anthophoridae. There is no known unique subfamily character that is present in all species, many such useful characters are lost in the cleptoparasitic species. Most species have a pygidial plate and well developed prepygidial fimbriae. The scopa is restricted to the hind leg and basitarsus. Source: Michener (2007). Bees of the World. John Hopkins University Press. 3. Diagnostic Images Results Generated: Monday, September 27, 2021 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Polarization Microscopy and Infrared Microspectroscopy of Integument Coverings of Diapausing Larvae in Two Distantly Related Nonsocial Bees
    Microscopy and Microanalysis (2018), 24,75–81 doi:10.1017/S1431927618000053 Micrographia Polarization Microscopy and Infrared Microspectroscopy of Integument Coverings of Diapausing Larvae in Two Distantly Related Nonsocial Bees Maria Luiza S. Mello1, Benedicto de Campos Vidal1 and Jerome G. Rozen, Jr.2 1Department of Structural and Functional Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP 13083-862, Brazil and 2Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West, 79th St., New York, NY 10024, USA Abstract The larvae of the two distantly related nonsocial bees Ericrocis lata (Apidae) and Hesperapis (Carinapis) rhodocerata (Melittidae), which develop mostly under arid desert areas of North America, and that differ in that they either spin (E. lata) or do not spin (H. rhodocerata) protective cocoons before entering diapause, produce transparent films that cover the larval integument. To understand the nature of these films, their responses to topochemical tests and their characteristics when examined with fluorescence and high-performance polarization microscopy and microspectroscopy were studied. A positive staining by Sudan black B, birefringence of negative sign, and a Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectrum typical of lipids were detected for the integument covering of both species. The FT-IR signature, particularly, suggests a wax chemical composition for these lipid coverings, resembling the waxes that are used as construction materials in the honey cells produced by social bees. Considering the arid environmental conditions under which these larvae develop, we hypothesize that their covering films may have evolved as protection against water depletion. This hypothesis seems especially appropriate for H. rhodocerata larvae, which are capable of undergoing a long diapause period in the absence of a protective cocoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Novitatesamerican MUSEUM PUBLISHED by the AMERICAN MUSEUM of NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST at 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y
    NovitatesAMERICAN MUSEUM PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10024 Number 3029, 36 pp., 67 figures, 3 tables November 27, 1991 Evolution of Cleptoparasitism in Anthophorid Bees as Revealed by Their Mode of Parasitism and First Instars (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) JEROME G. ROZEN, JR.1 CONTENTS Abstract .............................................. 2 Introduction .............................................. 2 Acknowledgments ............... ............................... 3 Historical Background ................ .............................. 4 Evolution of Cleptoparasitism in the Anthophoridae ............. ................... 6 Systematics of Cleptoparasitic First-Instar Anthophoridae ......... ................. 12 Methods .............................................. 12 Description of the Nomadinae Based on First Instars .......... .................. 13 Description of the Protepeolini Based on the First Instar ......... ................ 13 Description of the Melectini Based on First Instars ............ .................. 17 Xeromelecta (Melectomorpha) californica (Cresson) ........... ................. 17 Melecta separata callura (Cockerell) ......................................... 20 Melecta pacifica fulvida Cresson ............................................. 20 Thyreus lieftincki Rozen .............................................. 22 Zacosmia maculata (Cresson) ............................................. 22 Description of the Rhathymini Based on First Instars .........
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sources and Frequency of Brood Loss in Solitary Bees
    Apidologie Original Article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-019-00663-2 Sources and frequency of brood loss in solitary bees 1 2 Robert L. MINCKLEY , Bryan N. DANFORTH 1Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA 2Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Received4February2019– Revised 17 April 2019 – Accepted 4 June 2019 Abstract – We surveyed the literature for reports of parasites, predators, and other associates of the brood found in the nests of solitary bees. Studies were included in this survey if they reported the contents of all the bee brood cells that they examined. The natural enemies of solitary bees represented in the studies included here were taxonomically diverse. Although a few studies report high loss of solitary bee brood to a species-rich set of natural enemies, most studies report losses of less than 20% to few natural enemies. Brood parasitic bees are the greatest source of mortality for immatures of pollen-collecting solitary bees followed by meloid beetles (Meloidae), beeflies (Bombyliidae), and clerid beetles (Cleridae). Most groups, however, are reported from only a few host species and attack a low proportion of brood cells. Mortality due to unknown causes is also common. The suite of natural enemies that attack ground- and cavity-nesting solitary bees is very different. The cavity-nesting species have higher reported mortality due to unknown causes perhaps related to how nests are manipulated and handled by researchers. brood parasite / predator / cavity-nesting bees / ground-nesting bees / meta-analysis 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Community Patterns and Plant Attractiveness to Pollinators in the Texas High Plains
    Scale-Dependent Bee (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) Community Patterns and Plant Attractiveness to Pollinators in the Texas High Plains by Samuel Discua, B.Sc., M.Sc. A Dissertation In Plant and Soil Science Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Scott Longing Chair of the Committee Nancy McIntyre Robin Verble Cynthia McKenney Joseph Young Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May, 2021 Copyright 2021, Samuel Discua Texas Tech University, Samuel Discua, May 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many who helped me along the way on this long and difficult journey. I want to take a moment to thank them. First, I wish to thank my dissertation committee. Without their guidance, I would not have made it. Dr. McIntytre, Dr. McKenney, Dr. Young and Dr. Verble served as wise committee members, and Dr. Longing, my committee chair, for sticking with me and helping me reach my goal. To the Longing Lab members, Roberto Miranda, Wilber Gutierrez, Torie Wisenant, Shelby Chandler, Bryan Guevara, Bianca Rendon, Christopher Jewett, thank you for all the hard work. To my family, my parents, my sisters, and Balentina and Bruno: you put up with me being distracted and missing many events. Finally, and most important, to my wife, Baleshka, your love and understanding helped me through the most difficult times. Without you believing in me, I never would have made it. It is time to celebrate; you earned this degree right along with me. I am forever grateful for your patience and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and External Morphology of Bees
    3?00( The Biology and External Morphology of Bees With a Synopsis of the Genera of Northwestern America Agricultural Experiment Station v" Oregon State University V Corvallis Northwestern America as interpreted for laxonomic synopses. AUTHORS: W. P. Stephen is a professor of entomology at Oregon State University, Corval- lis; and G. E. Bohart and P. F. Torchio are United States Department of Agriculture entomolo- gists stationed at Utah State University, Logan. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The research on which this bulletin is based was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grants Nos. 3835 and 3657. Since this publication is largely a review and synthesis of published information, the authors are indebted primarily to a host of sci- entists who have recorded their observations of bees. In most cases, they are credited with specific observations and interpretations. However, information deemed to be common knowledge is pre- sented without reference as to source. For a number of items of unpublished information, the generosity of several co-workers is ac- knowledged. They include Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., Charles Osgood, Glenn Hackwell, Elbert Jay- cox, Siavosh Tirgari, and Gordon Hobbs. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Leland Chandler and Dr. Jerome G. Rozen, Jr., for reviewing the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions. Most of the drawings were prepared by Mrs. Thelwyn Koontz. The sources of many of the fig- ures are given at the end of the Literature Cited section on page 130. The cover drawing is by Virginia Taylor. The Biology and External Morphology of Bees ^ Published by the Agricultural Experiment Station and printed by the Department of Printing, Ore- gon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • ZOOL 260-2008 Léo C. Rocha-Filho
    ZOOLOGIA 26 (2): 299–304, June, 2009 New host records of Aglaomelissa duckei and a compilation of host associations of Ericrocidini bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Léo C. Rocha-Filho 1; Élder F. Morato 2 & Gabriel A. R. Melo 3, 4 1 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. 2 Departamento de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Acre. Campus, 69915-900 Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil. 3 Laboratório de Biologia Comparada de Hymenoptera, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná. Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. 4 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. For the first time, confirmed host records are reported for the monotypic Ericrocidini genus Aglaomelissa Snelling & Brooks, 1985. Aglaomelissa duckei (Friese, 1906) emerged from trap-nests of Centris (Heterocentris) analis (Fabricius, 1804) and C. (Heterocentris) terminata Smith, 1874 from two sites in the Brazilian Amazonian region. The parasitism ratio caused by A. duckei was high, varying from 80 to 100% of the brood cells in a single trap-nest. Also, a compilation of the known host records for the species of Ericrocidini is presented and host-parasite associations are discussed. Host associations are known for seven of the 11 genera and about 17 of the 42 species of the tribe, involving a total of 34 confirmed or putative host species of Centridini bees. All species of the tribe are known to attack only nests of Centris Fabricius, 1804, except Mesoplia rufipes (Perty, 1833) that also parasitizes nests of Epicharis Klug, 1807.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Pollinators and Other Insects Associated with Arizona Milkweed, Asclepias Angustifolia, at Four Sites in Southeastern Arizona
    Journal of Pollination Ecology, 27(1), 2021, pp 1-24 NEW RECORDS OF POLLINATORS AND OTHER INSECTS ASSOCIATED WITH ARIZONA MILKWEED, ASCLEPIAS ANGUSTIFOLIA, AT FOUR SITES IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA Robert A. Behrstock Naturewide Images, 10359 S Thicket Place, Hereford, AZ 85615 U.S.A. Abstract—Asclepias angustifolia is a Mexican milkweed that barely enters the U.S.A. Its pollinators and other insect visitors have not been investigated. During 2018 and 2019, insect visitors were photographed at a native population and three gardens in and near the Huachuca Mountains, Southeastern Arizona. A total of 216 site visits produced at least 369 species of insects in seven orders. Images revealed 140 potential pollinators with a preponderance of Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera. Orders of insects are discussed, as are flowering phenology, potential pollinators in functional groups, introduced insects, and the value of A. angustifolia for monarch butterflies and other insects in pollinator gardens and in planting palettes created for restoration sites. Keywords: Sky Island, Madrean Pine-Oak Woodland, monarch butterfly, Huachuca Mountains, gardening, restoration INTRODUCTION milkweed, A. linaria Cavanillies, that produces higher concentrations of cardenolide toxins and greater amounts of North American milkweeds (Asclepias spp.) provide defensive latex (Pegram & Melkonoff 2019). Planting nectar to an unusually large diversity of insects, making them milkweeds is becoming a widespread practice aimed at important members of existing ecosystems and valuable increasing north- or southbound cohorts of the monarch’s additions to sites benefiting from a broad spectrum of complicated multi-generational migration; however, some pollinators (Ollerton et al. 2019, Tallamy 2007). For authors (e.g., Inamine et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Netting Bees
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: April 2015 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (BIML), Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Beltsville, Maryland, over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the “Bee Inventory, Monitoring, and ID” discussion group. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Gene Scarpulla, Liz Sellers, and Tracy Zarrillo for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" – Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, discussing environmentalists) – Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Killing Bees to Study Them ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Insect Sting Pain Scale: How the Pain and Lethality of Ant, Wasp, and Bee Venoms Can Guide the Way for Human Benefit
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 27 May 2019 1 (Article): Special Issue: "Arthropod Venom Components and their Potential Usage" 2 The Insect Sting Pain Scale: How the Pain and Lethality of Ant, 3 Wasp, and Bee Venoms Can Guide the Way for Human Benefit 4 Justin O. Schmidt 5 Southwestern Biological Institute, 1961 W. Brichta Dr., Tucson, AZ 85745, USA 6 Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 1-520-884-9345 7 Received: date; Accepted: date; Published: date 8 9 Abstract: Pain is a natural bioassay for detecting and quantifying biological activities of venoms. The 10 painfulness of stings delivered by ants, wasps, and bees can be easily measured in the field or lab using the 11 stinging insect pain scale that rates the pain intensity from 1 to 4, with 1 being minor pain, and 4 being extreme, 12 debilitating, excruciating pain. The painfulness of stings of 96 species of stinging insects and the lethalities of 13 the venoms of 90 species was determined and utilized for pinpointing future promising directions for 14 investigating venoms having pharmaceutically active principles that could benefit humanity. The findings 15 suggest several under- or unexplored insect venoms worthy of future investigations, including: those that have 16 exceedingly painful venoms, yet with extremely low lethality – tarantula hawk wasps (Pepsis) and velvet ants 17 (Mutillidae); those that have extremely lethal venoms, yet induce very little pain – the ants, Daceton and 18 Tetraponera; and those that have venomous stings and are both painful and lethal – the ants Pogonomyrmex, 19 Paraponera, Myrmecia, Neoponera, and the social wasps Synoeca, Agelaia, and Brachygastra.
    [Show full text]