Join the Driving Force in Preserving Our Historic Automotive Sites and Supporting Our Unique Automotive Events
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download the War of 1812
LEQ: What country did the United States fight in the War of 1812? The painting shows British frigate Macedonian, her masts and sails destroyed, being fired upon by the U.S. frigate United States during the War of 1812. This event occurred off the Canary Islands. It is titled, Capture of His H.B.M. Frigate Macedonian by U.S. Frigate United States, October 25, 1812. The H.B.M. (His Britannic Majesty’s) Macedonian was commanded by Captain J.S. Carden. The U.S. Frigate United States was commanded by Commander Stephen Decatur, Esqr. The painting was created by Thomas Chambers (1808-1869) and is courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum. LEQ: What country did the United States fight in the War of 1812? Great Britain The painting shows British frigate Macedonian, her masts and sails destroyed, being fired upon by the U.S. frigate United States during the War of 1812. This event occurred off the Canary Islands. It is titled, Capture of His H.B.M. Frigate Macedonian by U.S. Frigate United States, October 25, 1812. The H.B.M. (His Britannic Majesty’s) Macedonian was commanded by Captain J.S. Carden. The U.S. Frigate United States was commanded by Commander Stephen Decatur, Esqr. The painting was created by Thomas Chambers (1808-1869) and is courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum. The War of 1812 This painting shows an attack on Fort Oswego, New York (May, 1814), during the War of 1812. This image is courtesy of the Royal Military College of Canada Archives and of Wikimedia Commons. -
Sir David William Smith's 1790 Manuscript Plan
No. 5 Rough Scetch of the King’s Domain at Detroit Clements Library January 2018 OccasionalSCETCH OF THE KING’S DOMAINBulletins AT DETROIT Occasional — Louie Miller and Brian Bulletins Leigh Dunnigan nyone familiar with the history of the Clements Library sions—Books, Graphics, Manuscripts, and Maps—have always knows that we have a long tradition of enthusiastic collect- shared that commitment to enhancing our holdings for the benefit Aing. Our founder and our four directors (in 94 years) have of the students and scholars who come here for their research. We been dedicated to the proposition that an outstanding research buy from dealers and at auction; we cultivate collectors and other library must expand its holdings to maintain its greatness, and we individuals to think about the Library as a home for their historical have used every means available to pursue interesting primary materials; and we are constantly on watch for anything, from single sources on early America. The curators of our four collecting divi- items to large collections, that we can acquire to help illuminate Fort Lernoult, the linch pin of Detroit’s defenses, was rushed to completion during 1778–1779. It was a simple earthen redoubt with four half-bastions and a ditch surrounded by an abattis (an entanglement of tree branches placed to impede an infantry assault). The “swallow tail” fortification on the north (top) side of the fort was designed but never completed. Fort Lernoult stood at what is today the intersection of Fort and Shelby streets in downtown Detroit. This is a detail of the Smith plan of 1790. -
Crucible.Pdf
1 Crucible of Flames Canada’s War of 1812 Year One Contents Introduction 4 by Kenneth Kidd 1 The Fuse Is Lit 6 by Jim Coyle 2 Brock Braces for War 11 by Jim Coyle 3 War Comes to the Great Lakes 14 by Kenneth Kidd 4 The Madness of William Hull 21 by Kenneth Kidd 5 Queenston Heights: Canada on the Brink 31 by Kenneth Kidd Appendix A The War of 1812: A Glossary 42 by Kenneth Kidd Appendix B Little York, on the Eve of War 58 by Kenneth Kidd Appendix C Time Travel: Camping Out With the Militia 62 by Kenneth Kidd Bibliography 69 Introduction It’s become axiomatic among historians that Canadians know they won the War of 1812, Americans somehow think they won, and the Indians — who would continue to cede land to American ex- pansion — definitely know they lost, despite fighting alongside British regulars and Canadian militia. The British, of course, have scant memory of the War of 1812, it being a distant, grubby affair that seemed at the time almost in- significant next to their titanic struggle against Napoleonic France. But the implications on this side of the Atlantic were profound. Roughly 35,000 people would perish through three years of a bit- ter war that pitted brother against brother, cousin versus cousin. The War of 1812 is what ultimately gives both Canada and the United States their sense of identity. Just as there was a part of the planet widely known as “America” and peopled by “Americans” long before the U.S. -
Museum Feasibility Study
Windsor Museum Museum Feasibility Development Study: Final Report April 2012 Creating Cultural Capital Lord Cultural Resources is a global professional practice dedicated to creating cultural capital worldwide. We assist people, communities and organizations to realize and enhance cultural meaning and expression. We distinguish ourselves through a comprehensive and integrated full-service offering built on a foundation of key competencies: visioning, planning, design, preservation and implementation. We value and believe in cultural expression as essential for all people. We conduct ourselves with respect for collaboration, local adaptation and cultural diversity, embodying the highest standards of integrity, ethics and professional practice. We help clients clarify their goals; we provide them with the tools to achieve those goals; and we leave a legacy as a result of training and collaboration. This proposal has been prepared without charge and its contents are copyrighted to Lord Cultural Resources. It is intended for the immediate use of the person to whom it is addressed. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ i 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to and Purpose of this Study .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work and Methodology -
River Raisin National Battlefield Park Lesson Plan Template
River Raisin National Battlefield Park 3rd to 5th Grade Lesson Plans Unit Title: “It’s Not My Fault”: Engaging Point of View and Historical Perspective through Social Media – The War of 1812 Battles of the River Raisin Overview: This collection of four lessons engage students in learning about the War of 1812. Students will use point of view and historical perspective to make connections to American history and geography in the Old Northwest Territory. Students will learn about the War of 1812 and study personal stories of the Battles of the River Raisin. Students will read and analyze informational texts and explore maps as they organize information. A culminating project will include students making a fake social networking page where personalities from the Battles will interact with one another as the students apply their learning in fun and engaging ways. Topic or Era: War of 1812 and Battles of River Raisin, United States History Standard Era 3, 1754-1820 Curriculum Fit: Social Studies and English Language Arts Grade Level: 3rd to 5th Grade (can be used for lower graded gifted and talented students) Time Required: Four to Eight Class Periods (3 to 6 hours) Lessons: 1. “It’s Not My Fault”: Point of View and Historical Perspective 2. “It’s Not My Fault”: Battle Perspectives 3. “It’s Not My Fault”: Character Analysis and Jigsaw 4. “It’s Not My Fault”: Historical Conversations Using Social Media Lesson One “It’s Not My Fault!”: Point of View and Historical Perspective Overview: This lesson provides students with background information on point of view and perspective. -
The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination
Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2021 "Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley" : The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination William R. Tharp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/6707 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley” The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University By. William R. Tharp Dr. Carolyn Eastman, Advisor Associate Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 14 May 2021 Tharp 1 © William R. Tharp 2021 All Rights Reserved Tharp 2 Abstract Along the banks of the Susquehanna River in early July 1778, a force of about 600 Loyalist and Native American raiders won a lopsided victory against 400 overwhelmed Patriot militiamen and regulars in the Wyoming Valley of Pennsylvania. While not well-known today, this battle—the Battle of Wyoming—had profound effects on the Revolutionary War and American culture and politics. Quite familiar to early Americans, this battle’s remembrance influenced the formation of national identity and informed Americans’ perceptions of their past and present over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. -
The Town of Amherstburg Cultural Strategy
The Town of Amherstburg Cultural Strategy February 22, 2011 PLANSCAPE Prepared by: Planscape Inc. 104 Kimberley Avenue Bracebridge, ON P1L1Z8 The Town of Amherstburg Cultural Strategy Funding Provided By: Ontario Ministy of Tourism and Culture The Town of Amherstburg Contents 1.0 Study Context ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Strategic Cultural Vision ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Definition of Municipal Cultural Planning ..................................................................................... 2 1.3 Study Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 A Portrait of Amherstburg .......................................................... 5 2.1 Community Profile ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Community Trends ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Existing Cultural Mandate ........................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Economic Development ............................................................................................................. -
War of 1812 Travel Map & Guide
S u sq u eh a n n a 1 Westminster R 40 r e iv v e i r 272 R 15 anal & Delaware C 70 ke Chesapea cy a Northeast River c o Elk River n 140 Havre de Chesapeake o 97 Grace City 49 M 26 40 Susquehanna 213 32 Flats 301 13 795 95 1 r e Liberty Reservoir v i R Frederick h 26 s 9 u B 695 Elk River G 70 u 340 n Sa p ssaf 695 rass 83 o Riv w er r e d 40 e v i r R R Baltimore i 13 95 v e r y M c i 213 a dd c le o B R n 70 ac iv o k e R r M 270 iv e 301 r P o to m ac 15 ster Che River 95 P 32 a R t i v a 9 e r p Chestertown 695 s 13 co R 20 1 i 213 300 1 ve r 100 97 Rock Hall 8 Leesburg 97 177 213 Dover 2 301 r ive r R e 32 iv M R 7 a r k got n hy te Ri s a v t 95 er e 295 h r p 189 S e o e C v 313 h ve i r C n R R e iv o er h 13 ka 267 495 uc 113 T Whitehall Bay Bay Bridge 50 495 Greensboro 193 495 Queen Milford Anne 7 14 50 Selby 404 Harrington Bay 1 14 Denton 66 4 113 y P 258 a a B t u rn 404 x te 66 Washington D.C. -
The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport
The 1812 Streets of Cambridgeport The Last Battle of the Revolution Less than a quarter of a century after the close of the American Revolution, Great Britain and the United States were again in conflict. Britain and her allies were engaged in a long war with Napoleonic France. The shipping-related industries of the neutral United States benefited hugely, conducting trade with both sides. Hundreds of ships, built in yards on America’s Atlantic coast and manned by American sailors, carried goods, including foodstuffs and raw materials, to Europe and the West Indies. Merchants and farmers alike reaped the profits. In Cambridge, men made plans to profit from this brisk trade. “[T]he soaring hopes of expansionist-minded promoters and speculators in Cambridge were based solidly on the assumption that the economic future of Cambridge rested on its potential as a shipping center.” The very name, Cambridgeport, reflected “the expectation that several miles of waterfront could be developed into a port with an intricate system of canals.” In January 1805, Congress designated Cambridge as a “port of delivery” and “canal dredging began [and] prices of dock lots soared." [1] Judge Francis Dana, a lawyer, diplomat, and Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, was one of the primary investors in the development of Cambridgeport. He and his large family lived in a handsome mansion on what is now Dana Hill. Dana lost heavily when Jefferson declared an embargo in 1807. Britain and France objected to America’s commercial relationship with their respective enemies and took steps to curtail trade with the United States. -
Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology
THE WAR OF 1812 MAGAZINE ISSUE 26 December 2016 Appendix I War of 1812 Chronology Compiled by Ralph Eshelman and Donald Hickey Introduction This War of 1812 Chronology includes all the major events related to the conflict beginning with the 1797 Jay Treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation between the United Kingdom and the United States of America and ending with the United States, Weas and Kickapoos signing of a peace treaty at Fort Harrison, Indiana, June 4, 1816. While the chronology includes items such as treaties, embargos and political events, the focus is on military engagements, both land and sea. It is believed this chronology is the most holistic inventory of War of 1812 military engagements ever assembled into a chronological listing. Don Hickey, in his War of 1812 Chronology, comments that chronologies are marred by errors partly because they draw on faulty sources and because secondary and even primary sources are not always dependable.1 For example, opposing commanders might give different dates for a military action, and occasionally the same commander might even present conflicting data. Jerry Roberts in his book on the British raid on Essex, Connecticut, points out that in a copy of Captain Coot’s report in the Admiralty and Secretariat Papers the date given for the raid is off by one day.2 Similarly, during the bombardment of Fort McHenry a British bomb vessel's log entry date is off by one day.3 Hickey points out that reports compiled by officers at sea or in remote parts of the theaters of war seem to be especially prone to ambiguity and error. -
A Thesis Entitled a History of Fort Meigs
A Thesis entitled A History of Fort Meigs: The Fort‘s Reconstruction as Reflection of Sense of Place to Northwest Ohio by Ashley A. Johnson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in History ________________________________________________ Dr .Diane Britton, Committee Chair ________________________________________________ Dr. Michael Jakobson, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Professor Barbara Floyd, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2011 Copyright 2011, Ashley A. Johnson This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no part of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An abstract of A History of Fort Meigs: The Fort‘s Reconstruction as Reflection of Sense of Place to Northwest Ohio by Ashley A. Johnson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in History The University of Toledo May 2011 Fort Meigs has endured for nearly 200 years due to its sense of place it offers to northwest Ohio. A sense of place consists of an area that offers locals an anchor of identity and explanation to understand their place and existence in time and space. In 1813, Fort Meigs first served northwest Ohio through the War of 1812 campaigns after the disastrous River Raisin Massacre and other repeated American losses; the two campaigns at the fort helped to turn the war in America‘s favor. Following the war period, the fort continued to serve the area by providing a space and backdrop for such things as political campaigns, memorial grounds for soldiers, celebrations of American war victories, and as a recreational area. -
Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg, Ontario Canada
Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg, Ontario Canada A WISE NATION PRESERVES ITS RECORDS GATHERS UP ITS MUNIMENTS DECORATES THE TOMBS OF ITS ILLUS TRIOUS DEAD REPAIRS ITS GREAT PUBLIC STRUCTURES AND FOSTERS NA TIONAL PRIDE AND LOVE OF COUNTRY BY PERPETUAL REFERENCE TO THE SACRIFICES AND GLORIES OF THE PAST. Joseph Howe Issued under the authority of THE HONOURABLE JEAN LESAGE, Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources Interior of Museum, Fort Maiden National Historic Park Fort Maiden National Historic Park Amherstburg—Ontario ORT MALDEN NATIONAL HISTORIC PARK, Amherstburg, Ontario, is situated F on the east bank of the Detroit River and is easily accessible from the cities of Windsor and Detroit, distant eighteen miles to the north. The Park contains part of the remaining earthworks of Fort Maiden, and on the grounds stands a fireproof museum built in 1939. An adjoining property was purchased in 1946 to allow expansion of the Park facilities. Fort Maiden was built in 1797-99 by the Second Battalion of the Royal Can adian Volunteers, under Captain Hector McLean, to replace Fort Lernoult at Detroit, one of the posts evacuated by the British in 1796 as a result of the Jay Treaty. The town of Amherstburg came into existence at the same time, a portion of the Military Reserve being laid out as a townsite. As the successor to Fort Lernoult at Detroit, which in turn had replaced the old French fort of Pontchartrain, Maiden fell heir to a history going back more than two centuries. Sanson's Map of New France, 1650, gives details of the region and it is generally believed that the information it contains was furnished by Father Bre- beuf.