DOCSLIB.ORG

View Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Technical Report STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS POCUHEN7 IS U.«U/uED " FOREIGN SALES PRG.-iioiiED Bioenergy Options Multidisciplinary Participatory Method for Assessing Bioenergy Options for Rural Villages in Tanzania Kauzeni, A.S., Masao, H.P., Sawe, E.N., Shechambo, F.C. Institute of Resource Assessment, University of-JDar Es'Salaam Ellegard; A. Stockholm Environment Institute Energy, Environment and Development Series - No. 44 Published by Stockholm Environment Institute ISBN: 91 88714 594 1998 ISSN: 1400-4348 DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Bioenergy Options Multidisciplinary Participatory Method for Assessing Bioenergy Options for Rural Villages in Tanzania Kauzeni, A.S., Masao, H.P., Sawe, E.N., Shechambo, F.C. Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar Es Salaam Ellegard, A. Stockholm Environment Institute Stockholm Environment Institute Box 2142 S-103 14 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 412 14 00 Fax: +46 8 723 03 48 E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.sei.se/ Responsible Editor: Karin Hultcrantz Copy and Layout: Karin Hultcrantz Stockholm Environment Institute © Copyright 1998 Stockholm Environment Institute. No part of this report may be reproduced in any form by photostat, microfilm, or any other means without written permission from the publisher. ISBN: 91 88714 59 4 ISSN: 1400-4348 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................vi 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 1 l. l Project Background .....................................................................................................l 1.2 Bioenergy Status in Tanzania ...........................................................................................1 1.3 Bioenergy Options .....................................................................................................4 1.4 Problem Statement .......................................................................................................5 1.5 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE STUDY..................................................................................... 7 1.6 Objectives and Focus of the Study ........................................................................8 1.7 Scope and Limitations of the Study .......................................................................9 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.....................................................................11 2.1 R eview of Methods ................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Developing a Methodology ..................................................................................13 2.2.1 Methodology Justification and Rationale........................................................ 13 2.2.2 Applicability of MUPARMIBO..........................................................................14 2.3 Description of the applied methodology ......................................................... 15 2.3.1 Preparation for Field Work and Logistics.......................................................... 16 2.3.2 PRA Activities in the Study Villages.................................................................17 2.4 Application of Different Techniques to Gather Data and Information on the Study V illages .................................................................... 17 2.4.1 Preparation of Village Map.................................................................................. 17 2.4.2 Presentation of Village History and Significant Events.................................. 18 2.4.3 Identification of Significant Changes and Trends............................................18 2.4.4 Preparation of Annual Seasonal Work Calendar............................................. 19 2.4.5 Preparation of a Diagram of Daily Activities.................................................. 20 2.4.6 Conducting Technical Interviews with Village Leaders................................ 21 2.4.7 Meeting with Leaders of Various Groups, Enterprises and Institutions.....21 2.4.8 Transect Walk Across the Village.....................................................................21 2.4.9 Household Interviews and Farm Sketches........................................................21 2.4.10 Organisation of Emerging Issues.......................................................................23 2.4.11 PRA Workshop......................................................................................................23 2.4.12 Ranking by Voting............................................................................................... 24 2.4.13 Paired Ranking Method........................................................................................24 2.5 Procedure for Analysis After Fieldwork .......................................................25 3 THE STUDY AREA........................................................................................26 3. l Kilimanjaro R egion ....................................................................................................26 3.2 The Study V illages ....................................................................................................27 3.3 R ombo District .............................................................................................................28 3.3.1 Kelamfua Village................................................................................................. 28 3.3.2 Maharo Village......................................................................................................29 3.3.3 Shimbi Mashariki Village................................................................................... 31 3.4 Mwanga District ..........................................................................................................34 3.4.1 Chomvu Village..................................................................................................... 34 3.4.2 Kagongo Village...................................................................................................36 3.4.3 Kigonigoni Village............................................................................................... 38 4 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE STUDY........................................................... 40 4.1 Methodology Testing ................................................................................................40 4.1.1 Energy Issues.........................................................................................................42 4.1.2 Social Issues............................................................................................................44 4.1.3 Economic Issues..................................................................................................... 46 4.1.4 Endowment of Natural Resources....................................................................... 46 4.1.5 Institutional Issues................................................................................................ 47 4.1.6 Policy Issues.......................................................................................................... 47 IV Bioenergyoptions 4.2 Summary of Bioenergy Options ............................................................................47 4.2.1 Improved Stoves......................................................................................................47 4.2.2 Improved Charcoal Production Techniques..................................................... 48 4.2.3 Biogas......................................................................................................................48 4.2.4 Producer Gas..........................................................................................................48 4.2.5 Liquid Fuels from Biomass................................................................................. 48 4.2.6 Bioenergy Produced Electric Power..................................................................49 4.3 Income -Earning activities Linked To Bioenergy U se................................. 49 4.3.1 Increasing Agricultural Production Through Water Pumping...................... 49 4.3.2 Milling, Chaffing and Cutting.............................................................................50 4.3.3 Tea and Tobacco Curing......................................................................................50 4.3.4 Charcoal Production............................................................................................. 50 4.3.5 Tar Production....................................................................................................... 50 4.3.6 Beer Brewing, Liquor Distilling........................................................................ 50 4.3.7 Brick Making..........................................................................................................51 4.3.8 Pottery.....................................................................................................................51 4.3.9 Lime Burning.........................................................................................................51 4.3.10 Fish Frying and Smoking.....................................................................................51 4.3.11 Briquetting.............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Chagga Agroforestry Homegardens And
    CLASSIFICATION OF CHAGGA AGROFORESTRY HOMEGARDENS AND THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO FOOD, INCOME AND WOOD ENERGY TO COMMUNITIES OF ROMBO DISTRICT, TANZANIA JIMSON MBWIGA A DISSSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE OF SOKOINE UNIVER SITY OF AGRICULTURE. MOROGORO, TANZANIA. 2016 ii ABSTRACT The present study was carried out in 2014 in Rombo District, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, in order to classify Chagga agroforestry homegardens and establish their relative contributions to food, income and wood energy to the local communities. The study methodology included random selection of four divisions, one ward from each division, one village from each ward and 30 households per village forming a total sample of 120 households. A social survey was subsequently carried out using questionnaires employed to household heads and checklists of probe questions for key informants. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 and Microsoft Excel Programs. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare means between and within treatments and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used to separate the significantly differing means. Results indicated that all five renewable natural resource components of woody perennials, herbaceous crops, animals, insects and aquatic life-forms were present in the Chagga agroforestry homegardens which were in various interactions broadly classified into nine agroforestry systems with the Agrosilvopastoral system being the most widely spread and the Agroaquosilvicultural, Agroaquosilvopastoral, Aposilvopastoral and Silvopastoral systems being, in that order, the least spread throughout the district. Spatial arrangements of components were the most common arrangement forming agroforestry technologies like boundary planting, mixed intercropping and live fences.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Turkana and the Lower Omo the Arid and Semi-Arid Lands Account for 50% of Kenya’S Livestock Production (Snyder, 2006)
    Lake Turkana & the Lower Omo: Hydrological Impacts of Major Dam & Irrigation Development REPORT African Studies Centre Sean Avery (BSc., PhD., C.Eng., C. Env.) © Antonella865 | Dreamstime © Antonella865 Consultant’s email: [email protected] Web: www.watres.com LAKE TURKANA & THE LOWER OMO: HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF MAJOR DAM & IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENTS CONTENTS – VOLUME I REPORT Chapter Description Page EXECUTIVE(SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................1! 1! INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 12! 1.1! THE(CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................ 12! 1.2! THE(ASSIGNMENT .................................................................................................................................. 14! 1.3! METHODOLOGY...................................................................................................................................... 15! 2! DEVELOPMENT(PLANNING(IN(THE(OMO(BASIN ......................................................................... 18! 2.1! INTRODUCTION(AND(SUMMARY(OVERVIEW(OF(FINDINGS................................................................... 18! 2.2! OMO?GIBE(BASIN(MASTER(PLAN(STUDY,(DECEMBER(1996..............................................................19! 2.2.1! OMO'GIBE!BASIN!MASTER!PLAN!'!TERMS!OF!REFERENCE...........................................................................19!
    [Show full text]
  • The Populat Kenya
    £ 4 World Population Year THE POPULAT KENYA - UGANDA - TANZANIA CI.CR.E.D. Senes THE POPULATION OF KENYA- UGANDA - TANZANIA SIMEON OMINDE Professor of Geography and Head of Department, University of Nairobi 1974 World Population Year C.I.C.R.E.D Series This study was initiated and financed by C.I.C.R.E.D. (Committee for International Coordination of National Research in Demography) to coincide with 1974 World Population Year. © Simeon Ominde © C.I.C.R.E.D. First published 1975 Printed in Kenya by Kenya Litho Ltd., P.O. Box 40775, Changamwe Road, Nairobi. CONTENTS Page PREFACE ¡v Chapter 1 The Area and Estimates of Population Growth 1 Chapter 2 Components of Population Growth 11 Chapter 3 Migration 40 Chapter 4 Population Composition 59 Chapter 5 Population Distribution 73 Chapter 6 Urbanization 88 Chapter 7 Labour Force 97 Chapter 8 Population Projection 105 Chapter 9 Population Growth and Socio-Economic Development 115 Conclusion 123 PREFACE This monograph presents the population situation in the area covered by Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya. The material has been prepared at the request of CICRED, as part of its contribution to the objectives of the World Population Year, 1974. In common with other developing countries of Africa, the East African countries are becoming acutely aware of the importance of rapid population growth and its significance to the attainment of development objectives. It has become increasingly clear that with the current rates of growth and the limited resources, the burden of socio-economic development programmes has become more serious. The search for alternative strategies to development must therefore focus attention on the impact of accelerating growth rate which leads to retardation of the rate of economic and social development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystem, Shared Responsibility
    LAKE JIPE Threatened Ecosystem, Shared Responsibility Background Lake Jipe is located on the Kenya-Tanzania border, to the North and East of the Pare Mountains. The lake borders Kenya's Tsavo West National Park to the south, while Tanzania's Mt. Kilimanjaro dominates the horizon some distance to the northwest. The lake is 700 metres above the sea level and has an area of 28 square kilometres, maximum length of 12 kilometres, average depth of less than three metres and the width varies between 2-3 kilometres. Lake Jipe is part of the Pangani River Basin. The River Lumi is the main river that flows into the lake from Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania passing through Kenya before it reaches the lake again in Tanzania. River Muvuruni flows into the lake from the south. There are several seasonal streams, mainly from the North Pare Mountains that also drain into Lake Jipe. The lake has one outflow, the River Ruvu, located in Tanzania to the North of the lake flowing westwards to Nyumba ya Mungu. The lake's ecosystem is endowed with rich biodiversity and is known especially for water birds. Commercial activities taking place around the lake include fishing, livestock rearing, agriculture, tourism, especially around the Tsavo National Park. The prosperity and future of the populations who live near the lake, and the well-being of the environment, depend on wise use of the lake's water and wise management of natural resources. Over the years, the effects of human activity and climate change have conspired to rob the lake of its valuable resources, thereby affecting ecosystem biodiversity and the livelihoods of local populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Baseline Study for Hand in Hand Eastern Africa Program in Northern Tanzania August 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. 2 List of tables.......................................................................................................................... 3 List of figures ........................................................................................................................ 4 List of Abbreviations.............................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgement................................................................................................................. 6 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 13 1.1 Overview of HiH EA Model.................................................................................... 13 1.2 HiH EA Expansion Plan for Tanzania.................................................................... 14 2. The Baseline Study...................................................................................................... 15 2.1 The Scoping Study................................................................................................ 15 2.1.1 Objectives of the Scoping
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Roads Act
    LAWS OF KENYA KENYA ROADS ACT No. 2 of 2007 Revised Edition 2012 [2007] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012] No. 2 of 2007 Kenya Roads NO. 2 OF 2007 KENYA ROADS ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I – PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART II – ESTABLISHMENT OF VARIOUS AUTHORITIES A – The Kenya National Highways Authority 3. Establishment of the Kenya National Highways Authority. 4. Functions of the Authority. 5. The Board of the Authority. B – The Kenya Rural Roads Authority 6. Establishment of the Kenya Rural Roads Authority. 7. Functions of the Authority. 8. The Board of the Authority C – The Kenya Urban Roads Authority 9. Establishment of the Kenya Urban Roads Authority. 10. Functions of the Authority. 11. Board of the Authority. PART III – ADMINISTRATION 12. Tenure of office. 13. Director-General. 14. Qualifications of Director-General. 15. Other staff of the Authority. 16. Delegation by Board. 17. Remuneration of Board members. 18. Authority to make regulations relating to staff. 19. Regulations on staff by Minister. 20. Regional offices. 21. Delegation of functions by Authority. PART IV – POWERS OF AUTHORITIES GENERALLY 22. Powers of Authority as a statutory body. 23. Acquisition of land for purposes of the Authority. 24. Power to enter and survey land. 25. Power to enter land to prevent accidents. 26. Power to enter and to alter position of pipes etc. 3 [Issue 1] No. 2 of 2007 [Rev. 2012] Kenya Roads Section 27. Power to remove pipes etc. from within the road reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Involvement of Community in the Secondary School
    i CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, certify that I have read and hereby recommend for acceptance by the Open University of Tanzania, a dissertation entitled: Involvement of Community in Secondary School Education Management in Selected Community Secondary Schools in Moshi Rural District, in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education, Planning and Policy Studies in the Open University of Tanzania. ........................................................... Prof. A. S. MEENA, Ph. D (Education) Supervisor Date: ………………………………………… ii DECLARATION I, Pudensiana Kibona, declare that this dissertation is my own original work and that it has not been presented and will not be presented to any other university for a similar or any other degree award. Signature .................................................. Date:......................................................... iii COPYRIGHT This dissertation is copyright material protected under the Berne Convention, the Copyright Act of 1999 and other international and National enactments, in that behalf, an intellectual property. It may not be reproduced by any means, in full or in part, except for short extracts in fair dealing, for research or private study, critical scholarly review or discourse with an acknowledgement, without the written permission of the School of Graduate Studies, on behalf of both the author and the Open University of Tanzania. iv DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my late father Michel Kibona who died in 1978 and to my mother Agnes Lenguyana for rearing me. Without them, I would have never been the way I am today leave alone to accomplish what I have gained from their experience and hence to finally complete this work. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I thank God for keeping me alive and healthy to complete this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in Tanzania Mainland: Revival and Growth Sam Maghimbi
    CoopAFRICA Working Paper No. 14 Cooperatives in Tanzania mainland: Revival and growth Sam Maghimbi In Tanzania nearly eight million people are dependent on the services and employment opportunities associated with the cooperative movement. The movement shows strong and persistent organizational stability. The Tanzania Federation of Cooperatives continually undertakes assessments and makes contributions to cooperative policy and legislation. Their capacity to lobby on behalf of cooperative members has made it possible for them to reach other cooperative movements, especially in Europe, and AFRICA there is now some networking between local cooperatives and foreign cooperative Coop Working Paper No.14 organizations. However, marketing services of the Tanzanian Federation of Cooperatives are limited and complaints of lack of access to markets and low prices for Cooperatives in Tanzania cooperative members’ crops are very common. Crop marketing cooperatives are heavily indebted to banks, which highlights the need for growth in the number of cooperative mainland: Revival and banks. Savings and credit cooperatives have been more successful in increasing social protection for members, by providing loans for emergencies, social fees and funerals, growth among others. Sam Maghimbi ILO Country Office for the United Republic of Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda COOPAFRICA Kazi House, Maktaba Street P.O. Box 9212 Dar es Salaam United Republic of Tanzania Tel: +255.22.2196700 Fax: +255.22.2122597 E-mail: [email protected] www.ilo.org/coopafrica International Labour Office Cooperative Programme (EMP/COOP) 4, route des Morillons 1211 Geneva 22 Switzerland Tel: + 41.22.7997021 Fax: +41.22.7996570 E-mail: [email protected] www.ilo.org/coop The Cooperative Facility for Africa (CoopAFRIC A ) is a regional technical cooperation programme of the ILO contributing to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and the promotion of decent work in Africa by promoting self-help initiatives, mutual assistance in communities and cross border exchanges through the cooperative approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Hai District Water Supply Project a Model Of
    HAI DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY PROJECT A MODEL OF COMMUNITY RURAL WATER SUPPLY INITIATED BY A CHURCH IN TANZANIA A paper prepared and presented by Eng. Rogers C. Marandu at the workshop of Faith Schools Water Sanitation and Hygiene, held at Sarum College Salisbury - England 5th – 7th July 2009. i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................................iii Chapter 1...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Water supply and sanitation in Tanzania............................................................................................................................ 1 Water supply in Hai District ................................................................................................................................................ 2 How the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania – Northern Diocese (ELCT – ND) chipped in to the project....... 2 Chapter 2...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project Execution.....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Efficiency and Effectiveness of Domestic
    THE ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF DOMESTIC WATER ALLOCATION IN MOSHI RURAL DISTRICT: THE CASE OF KIRUA-KAHE META, PETER ONESMO A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS OF SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE. MOROGORO, TANZANIA. 2016 ii ABSTRACT Water is one of the scarce resources very important for the development for humankind hence efficient allocation is needed. Economically, efficient allocation of water is desirable to maximize the welfare of the society that obtains from available sources. The rural population water supply services have been left behind which increase with domestic water demand. There are some initiatives in Moshi Rural District to establish some water projects so as to solve the problem of water scarcity. There was a need to know the efficiency of domestic water allocation for the case of Kirua-Kahe because relatively little is known about the service and satisfaction of customers. There are three specific objectives in this study which are to evaluate the domestic water allocation of Kirua-Kahe Water Project in Moshi Rural District, to determine the domestic water allocation efficiency in Kirua-Kahe Water Project and to examine the effectiveness of Kirua-Kahe domestic water allocation in Moshi Rural District. Cross section or survey design was used with both quantitative supplemented with qualitative approach to present results. Methods for data collection involved primary and secondary sources through interviews, questionnaires and direct observations. Findings show that Kirua-Kahe uses Gravity and Pumping systems for supplying water. Gravity water supply system has 8 working intakes, 2 boreholes while Pumping water Supply system consists of 15 small pumping schemes being pumped from boreholes and 1 spring.
    [Show full text]