Country Case: Stakeholder Engagement During the Construction of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Country Case: Stakeholder Engagement During the Construction of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5

Stakeholder engagement during the construction of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 Country case: Stakeholder engagement during the construction of Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 Description Public Procurement Construction of T5 was approved by the Secretary of State on 20 Principle: Participation November 2001, after the longest public inquiry in British history (46 months). Construction of the new terminal started in Procurement Stage: September 2002. Phase 1 of the project was completed and opened Post-award in March 2008, with the second phase opening in June 2011. The project required an estimated investment (mostly from British Audience: Policy Maker, Airport Authority) of more than GBP 4.2 billion. Procuring Entity, Civil Society As said, the construction of Heathrow’s Terminal 5 holds the record of the longest public inquiry in the history of the United Kingdom, which lasted nearly four years. The public inquiry cost GBP 80 million, heard 700 witnesses, and generated 100,000 pages of transcripts. The Secretary of State gave his approval to the project after reviewing the public inquiry report, and a number of conditions and limitations were imposed to take into account the complaints of local communities regarding noise and pollution. Heathrow has since launched property and noise consultations to develop compensation packages and seek views on how that compensation fund should be used. The London Chamber of Commerce became an advocate for the project as it launched a campaign, Business for T5, to promote the benefits of expanding the airport. It claimed that overseas visitors would spend an estimated 10 million fewer nights in Britain if Terminal 5 did not go ahead with a loss of about GBP 1 billion to the hotels sector and another GBP 500 million to the wider tourist industry. Source: OECD (2015), Effective Delivery of Large Infrastructure Projects: The Case of the New International Airport of Mexico City, OECD Publishing, Paris. ©OECD 2016 oe.cd/procurement-toolbox 1/1 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5
CMR 420, 02/01/09 Winter 2009 | Vol.51, No.2 | REPRINT SERIES CaliforniaReview Management Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5 Andrew Davies David Gann Tony Douglas © 2009 by The Regents of the University of California Innovation in Megaprojects: SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AT LONDON HEATHROW TERMINAL 5 Andrew Davies David Gann Tony Douglas growing number of infrastructure projects are being proposed and built throughout the world. A megaproject is an investment of $1B or more to build the physical infrastructures that enable people, resources, and information to move within buildings and betweenA locations throughout the world. Organizations responsible for produc- ing megaprojects face a “performance paradox.” Despite the growth in number and opportunities to beneﬁt from learning, megaprojects continue to have poor performance records.1 Most are unsuccessful measured against their original time, cost, quality, and safety objectives, as well as their expected revenue predictions. The construction of airport infrastructure provides examples of how megaprojects can go wrong. When Denver’s $5B international airport opened in 1995, it was almost 200 per cent over the original budget, 16 months late, and passenger trafﬁc achieved only half the predicted revenues. The opening of the airport was plagued by problems with the baggage handling system, which was eventually abandoned in August 2005. Although Hong Kong’s $20B Chek Lap Kok airport opened on time in July 1998, severe disruptions were experienced for six months after opening due to computer problems with the baggage han- dling system. The authors thank Jennifer Whyte, Catelijne Coopmans, and Tim Brady, who worked on a larger study of the T5 project with us, and four anonymous referees who helped to develop our conceptual approach.
[Show full text]
The Business of Heathrow Airport Limited
CAP 1133 Appendix C: The business of Heathrow Airport Limited APPENDIX C The business of Heathrow Airport Limited C1 This appendix provides an overview of the current ownership and history of Heathrow and the business of Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL). In particular, this appendix examines the: . services HAL provides to different users; and . sources of HAL's revenue. The ownership of Heathrow C2 Heathrow is owned by Heathrow Airport Holdings Limited (previously BAA), which is privately managed on behalf of its shareholders, with the major shareholders currently being: . FGP Topco Limited, a consortium owned and led by the infrastructure specialist Ferrovial S.A.– 33.6 per cent; . Qatar Holding LLC – 20.0 per cent; . Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec –13.3 per cent; . the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation – 11.9 per cent; . Alinda Capital Partners –11.2 per cent; and . China Investment Corporation – 10 per cent.1 The development of Heathrow2 C3 Heathrow has two parallel east-west runways and is located around 14 miles west of London.3 It sits on a site that covers 1,227 hectares. C4 The airport started operations in 1930 as a private airport to assemble and test aircraft. 1 HAL, Company Information, http://www.heathrowairport.com/about-us/company-news-and- information/company-information (accessed 30 October 2013). 2 HAL, http://www.heathrowairport.com/about-us/facts-and-figures/heathrow's-history (accessed 30 October 2012). 3 Liaison Group of UK Airport consultative committees, http://www.ukaccs.info/profiles.htm#LHR (accessed 20 December 2012). 1 CAP 1133 Appendix C: The business of Heathrow Airport Limited C5 In 1944, as part of the World War Two war effort, it was requisitioned by the Air Ministry for development into a Royal Air Force transport base.
[Show full text]
The Opening of Heathrow Terminal 5
House of Commons Transport Committee The opening of Heathrow Terminal 5 Twelfth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 22 October 2008 HC 543 Published on 3 November 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chairman) Mr David Clelland MP (Labour, Tyne Bridge) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Mr Philip Hollobone MP (Conservative, Kettering) Mr John Leech MP (Liberal Democrat, Manchester, Withington) Mr Eric Martlew MP (Labour, Carlisle) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) David Simpson MP (Democratic Unionist, Upper Bann) Mr Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Mr David Wilshire MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) The following were also members of the Committee during the period covered by this report: Mrs Gwyneth Dunwoody MP (Labour, Crewe and Nantwich) Mr Lee Scott (Conservative, Ilford North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/transcom.
[Show full text]
Group Traffic and Capacity Statistics
DECEMBER 2012 - GROUP TRAFFIC AND CAPACITY STATISTICS . In December 2012, Group traffic measured in Revenue Passenger Kilometres rose by 0.3 per cent versus December 2011 (down 2.1 per cent on a like for like basis); Group capacity measured in Available Seat Kilometres was down 0.4 per cent (down 3.5 per cent on a like for like basis). Group premium traffic for the month of December grew by 4.6 per cent compared to the previous year, with a 0.4 per cent decline in non-premium traffic. Underlying market conditions remain unchanged from those described at IAG Capital Markets Day on 9th November. There is continued firmness in trends at British Airways and weakness in Spanish markets as in the previous months. January 7th, 2013 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENTS Iberia and unions representing ground staff, cabin crews and pilots have agreed to negotiate the terms of the company’s Transformation Plan, aimed at restoring profitability and ensuring the airline’s future. Unions decided to call off the strikes planned for December after the agreement was reached. British Airways unveiled seating plans for its new Airbus A380s and Boeing 787s, which will be delivered from May 2013. The A380 will have 469 seats in four different cabin classes, while the Boeing 787 will have 214 seats in three different cabin classes. British Airways announced plans to begin a new service to Chengdu in China. The three times a week service will begin in September 2013 from Heathrow Terminal 5. Iberia has launched Iberia Conecta, a free service to inform customers directly by text or email message about any change in the status of their flights.
[Show full text]
HEATHROW TERMINAL 5 OPENS on Friday 14 March, Her Majesty the Queen Officially Opened the New Terminal 5 Building at Heathrow Airport
HEATHROW TERMINAL 5 OPENS On Friday 14 March, Her Majesty The Queen officially opened the new Terminal 5 building at Heathrow Airport. Despite new sections of Underground being previously completed (the Piccadilly Line from Heathrow T1,2,3 to Terminal 5 and Heathrow Express from Heathrow Central T1,2,3 to Terminal 5), there was no Royal opening for these. The Piccadilly Line extension to Heathrow Central (as it was then) on 16 December 1977 was a Royal occasion, as was the Terminal 4 opening on 1 April 1986 (the station opened on 12 April), the latter being in the hands of the Prince and Princess of Wales. The opening for passengers came on Thursday 27 March 2008, for both the Piccadilly Line and Heathrow Express. Both lines and platforms lay side by side each other. A short section of blue-tinted glass „wall‟ separates the two railways, so it possible to see one from the other. The Heathrow Express platforms are numbered 3 and 4, while the Piccadilly Line platforms are numbered 5 (arrival) and 6 (departure). Platforms 1 and 2 are reserved for any future main line rail expansion. Notices suggest that passengers might find it quicker to use the lifts, instead of two (or more) escalators from platform level into the terminal building. Here on the first day, your reporter was greeted with the announcement of delays in the air terminal to passengers‟ baggage. This turned into a rather big problem, which resulted in a number of flights being cancelled from the all-BA terminal, not only on opening day but for many days after, and certainly as these notes were being finalised on 6 April.
[Show full text]
Logistel Presentation
Arup Aviation Ten-year prospective view of Heathrow Airport Airport privatization Tiago Lopes 0 0 LogistelProject International [] Conference Lisbon, MayFinal 2008Report [] 200 [] 0 Contents 1. Heathrow airport development 2. Heathrow performance indicators 3. Airport privatization market 1 1 LogistelProject International [] Conference Lisbon, MayFinal 2008Report [] 200 [] 1 London Heathrow airport overview z Third largest airport in the world in passenger throughput (67.5 mppa in 2007) after Atlanta and Chicago O’Hare z Heathrow is the world’s largest international airport z 34% of passengers at Heathrow are transfer pax z Heathrow handles 1.3 million tons of cargo per year and is the 4th largest cargo airport in Europe z Heathrow is a destination for 90 airlines and has direct connections to 180 airports in the world z Heathrow has 5 passenger terminals including T5 with an initial capacity of 35 million passengers +45 million for the others z Home base of British Airways (oneWorld), BMI (Star Alliance) and Virgin Atlantic z London Heathrow has the highest connectivity (# flights) in the transatlantic market, the largest single market in the world z Heathrow operates under strict environmental constraints z The airport employs around 68,000 staff, 4,500 by BAA alone z Heathrow airport is owned by BAA, which also owns Gatwick and Stansted in the London area z Aeronautical charges are regulated through a price-cap. Following the latest review Heathrow is allowed to increase its charges by 23% in real terms over the next 5 years 2 2 LogistelProject International [] Conference Lisbon, MayFinal 2008Report [] 200 [] 2 London Heathrow challenges z Heathrow is congested and offers poor passenger experience z Its two runways operate at 99% of permitted capacity.
[Show full text]
GAO-04-835 Transatlantic Aviation
United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.-European Markets a GAO-04-835 July 2004 TRANSATLANTIC AVIATION Effects of Easing Restrictions on U.S.- Highlights of GAO-04-835, a report to European Markets congressional requesters Transatlantic airline operations Open Skies agreements have benefited airlines and consumers. Airlines between the United States and benefited by being able to create integrated alliances with foreign airlines. European Union (EU) nations are Through such alliances, airlines connected their networks with that of their currently governed by bilateral partner’s (e.g., by code-sharing agreements), expanded the number of cities agreements that are specific to the they could serve, and increased passenger traffic. Consumers benefited by United States and each EU country. Since 1992, the United States has being able to reach more destinations with this “on-line” service, and from signed so-called “Open Skies” additional competition and lower prices. GAO’s analysis found that travelers agreements with 15 of the 25 EU have a choice of competitors in the majority of the combinations of U.S.-EU countries. A “nationality clause” in destinations (such as Kansas City-Berlin). each agreement allows only those airlines designated by the signatory The Court of Justice decision could alter commercial aviation in four key countries to participate in their ways. First, it would essentially create one Open Skies agreement for the transatlantic markets. United States and EU, thereby extending U.S. airline access to markets that are now restricted under traditional bilateral agreements.
[Show full text]
Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and Organisational Structure the Airport
Competition between Airports and the Application of Sfare Aid Rules Volume H ~ Country Reports Italy Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and organisational structure The airport is part of Gruppo SEA (Milan Airports). Ownership is 14.6% local government and 84.6% City of Milan. Other shareholders hold the remaining 0.8%. Privatisation (partial) was scheduled for the end of 2001 but was stopped after the events of 11th September. Now the proposed date is October 2002 but this has still to be finalised. Only 30% of the shareholding will be moved into the private sector with no shareholder having more than 5%. There are no legislative changes required. The provision of airport services is shared between ENAV (ATC), Italian police (police), SEA (security), ATA and SEA Handling (passenger and ramp handling), Dufntal (duty-free) and SEA Parking (car parking). There are no current environmental issues but, in the future, there is a possible night ban and charges imposed according to aircraft noise. 2 Type ofairpo Milan Linate is a city-centre (almost) airport that serves mainly the scheduled domestic and international market with a growing low-cost airline presence (Buzz, Go). There is very little charter and cargo traffic but some General Aviation. The airport is subject to traffic distribution rules imposed by the Italian government with the aim of 'encouraging' airlines to move to Malpensa. Traffic Data (2000) Domestic fíghts Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 2 103 341 _ 2 103 341 Terminal Passengers (departures) 2 084 008
[Show full text]
Six Months Results Announcement
SIX MONTHS RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT International Consolidated Airlines Group (IAG) today (August 3, 2012) presented Group consolidated results for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. In addition, IAG presented combined results for the six months comparative period ended June 30, 2011, including Iberia‟s first 21 days of January in 2011. IAG period highlights on combined results: Second quarter operating loss of €4 million, before exceptional items (2011: operating profit €190 million) Operating loss for the half year of €253 million before exceptional items (2011: operating profit €88 million) British Airways made an operating profit, after exceptional items, of €13 million in the half year to June 30, 2012 and Iberia made an operating loss of €263 million Loss before tax for the half year of €390 million (2011: profit before tax of €39 million) Revenue for the half year up 9.8 per cent to €8,532 million (2011: €7,773 million), including €278 million or 3.6 per cent currency impact Passenger unit revenue for the half year up 8.9 per cent, on top of capacity increases of 2.6 per cent Fuel costs up 25.0 per cent to €2,973 million (2011: €2,378 million before exceptional items) Non fuel costs before exceptional items, up 9.5 per cent at €5,812 million, including €198 million of adverse currency impact. Non- fuel unit costs up 6.7 per cent, or 3.0 per cent at constant currency Cash of €4,013 million at June 30, 2012 was up €278 million on 2011 year end (December 2011: €3,735 million) Group net debt up €160 million to €1,308
[Show full text]
The Future of Air Transport
The Future of Air Transport December 2003 Department for Transport The Future of Air Transport Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Transport by command of Her Majesty December 2003 Cm 6046 £25.00 Future of Air Transport Enquiry Line 0845 100 5554. This line will be open until 31 March 2004. This document is also downloadable from the web site at www.dft.gov.uk/aviation/whitepaper This White Paper refers to aviation policy across the UK. In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, land-use planning, surface access and a number of other matters associated with airport development are the responsibility of the devolved administrations. The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of the partially sighted in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the web site in accordance with the W3C’s Web Accessibility Initiative’s criteria. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard, or you are a carer for someone who has, please contact the Department’s Future of Air Transport Enquiry Line. Department for Transport Great Minster House 76 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DR Telephone 020 7944 8300 © Crown Copyright 2003 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified.
[Show full text]
Introducing Our New Summer Schedule from Leeds Bradford Airport and a Move to Heathrow Terminal 5
Introducing our new summer schedule from Leeds Bradford Airport and a move to Heathrow Terminal 5 British Airways is delighted to announce our new summer schedule for services operating between Leeds Bradford Airport and London Heathrow from 01 April 2013. 20 flights per week will connect Leeds Bradford to the Capital and with the exciting move to Heathrow Terminal 5 connecting to our extensive global network from Yorkshire will be even easier. The conveniently timed services will allow quick and easy transfers to key worldwide destinations such as Hong Kong, New York, Johannesburg, Singapore and Sydney. LBA LHR ALN FLT STD STA Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun TTL BA 1341 930 1030 319 - 319 319 319 - - 4 BA 1341 1005 1105 - - - - - - 319 1 BA 1341 1015 1115 - 319 - - - - - 1 BA 1341 1035 1135 - - - - - 319 - 1 BA 1343 1505 1605 319 319 - 319 319 - 319 5 BA 1343 1515 1615 - - 319 - - - - 1 BA 1343 1545 1645 - - - - - 319 - 1 BA 1345 2110 2210 319 319 319 319 319 - 319 6 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 20 LHR LBA ALN FLT STD STA Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun TTL BA 1340 720 820 - - - - - 319 - 1 BA 1340 750 850 - - - - - - 319 1 BA 1340 755 855 319 319 319 319 319 - - 5 BA 1342 1235 1335 319 319 319 319 319 - 319 6 BA 1342 1350 1450 - - - - - 319 - 1 BA 1344 1930 2030 319 319 319 319 319 - 319 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 20 Fares start from £55 one way including all taxes, fees and charges.
[Show full text]