Организация Объединенных Наций A/CN.9/977
Генеральная Ассамблея Distr.: General 1 April 2019 Russian Original: English
Комиссия Организации Объединенных Наций по праву международной торговли Пятьдесят вторая сессия Вена, 8–26 июля 2019 года
Библиография последних работ, касающихся деятельности ЮНСИТРАЛ*
Записка Секретариата
Содержание
Стр. I. Работы общего характера ...... 2 II. Международная купля-продажа товаров ...... 3 III. Международный коммерческий арбитраж и согласительная процедура ...... 10 IV. Международные перевозки ...... 20 V. Международные платежи (включая независимые гарантии и резервные аккредитивы) 22 VI. Электронная торговля ...... 22 VII. Обеспечительные интересы (включая финансирование под дебиторскую задолженность) 25 VIII. Закупки ...... 26 IX. Несостоятельность ...... 27 X. Международные контракты на строительство ...... 28 XI. Международная встречная торговля ...... 29 XII. Проекты в области инфраструктуры, финансируемые из частных источников ...... 29 XIII. Урегулирование споров в режиме онлайн ...... 29 XIV. Микро-, малые и средние предприятия ...... 30 XV. Урегулирование споров между инвесторами и государствами ...... 30
______* Текущая и сводная библиография с подробными примечаниями размещена в Интернете по адресу https://uncitral.un.org/ru/library/bibliography.
V.19-02150 (R) 260419 260419 *1902150*
A/CN.9/977
I. Работы общего характера
Alag, A. and Z. Drabu. Summary report of the UNCITRAL 50th Anniversary Congress. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) Part I: 21:1:89-108, 2017, Part II: 21:2:189-204, 2017. Bashiri, A. and M. Valizadeh. چالشهای حقوقی همگرایی اقتصادی دولتها از منظر حقوق تجارت بینالملل؛ با تأکید بر اتحادیۀ اروپا و اتحادیۀ تجارت آزاد اروپا )افتا( Public law studies quarterly (Tehran) 49:1:177-194, 2019. Translation of title: Legal challenges of economic convergence in international trade law with emphasis on European Union and European Free Trade Association (EFTA). Castle, T.D. United Nations Day lecture 2017: 50 years of UNCITRAL: what’s next? Bar news (Sydney) 88-95, spring 2018. Castro Cervantes, R. de. La unificación del derecho privado frente a la globaliza ción = the unification of private law in the face of globalization. Justicia juris (Barranquilla, Colombia) 6:12:70-78, 2009. Colas, B. Le Canada et le droit international privé en matière commerciale. In Canada et droit international : 150 ans d’histoire et perspectives d’avenir. Waterloo, Ont., Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2018, document no. 14. Czerwenka, B. Address to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly by Ms. Beate Czerwenka (Germany), Chairperson of the 51st Session of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (15 October 2018). Douglas, J. Australia’s role in UNCITRAL: implementation of conventions and model laws. International trade and business law review (Chatswood, N.S.W.) 21:231-243, 2018. Eiselen, S. Teaching transnational commercial law in the African context. University of Western Australia law review (Perth) 40:2:3–22, 2016. Fujita, T. When does Japan not conclude uniform private law conventions? Japanese yearbook of international law (Tokyo) 60:59-85, 2017. Glitz, F.E.Z. Direito internacional privado e do comércio internacional: coletânea normativa. 5th ed. Curitiba, Brazil, Editora JML, 2018. 1371 p. Translation of title: International private law and international trade law.
Ito, H. 国際取引とコントラクト･ガバナンス. ChuoOnline 23 January 2018. Translation of title: International trade and contract governance. Jacquet, J.-M. Sur l’exercice de la fonction normative de la Commission des Nations Unies pour le Droit Commercial International (CNUDCI). In Mélanges en l’hon- neur du Professeur Claude Witz. Paris, LexisNexis, 2018, p. 361-375. Japan. Global Private Law Forum (GPLF) and others, eds. Emerging rules of international commercial law: bilingual (English-Japanese) selected UNCITRAL texts. Japan, s.n., 2016. 377 p. Király, M. and T. Szabados, eds. Perspectives of unification of private international law in the European Union. Budapest, Eötvös University Press, 2018. 105 p. Kozuka, S. The selective reception of uniform law in Asia. Japanese yearbook of international law (Tokyo) 60:86–112, 2017.
2/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Kozuka, S. and H. Shinomiya. Harmonised rules for emerging private initiatives in space?: in quest of fair, equitable and commercially viable rules for extraterrestrial mining. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:229-248, 2018. Mazhorina, M.V. Международное частное право в условиях глобализации: от разгосударствления к фрагментации. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki (Moscow) 1:193217, 2018. Morishita, T. Successes and failures of harmonization of commercial laws. Japanese yearbook of international law (Tokyo) 60:113-135, 2017. Ramaswamy, M.P. and J. Ribeiro, eds. Trade development through harmonization of commercial law = l’harmonisation du droit commercial facteur de développement du commerce. Wellington, New Zealand Association for Comparative Law, 2015. 476 p. Şandru, D.M. Dreptul comerţului internaţional. 3rd ed. Bucureşti, Editura Universitară, 2012. 31 p. Translation of title: International trade law. Serpa Soares, M. de. 51st Session of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law: opening address in New York, 25 June 2018. Sono, H. Going forward with uniform private law treaties: a study in Japan’s behavioral pattern. Japanese yearbook of international law (Tokyo) 60:10-58, 2017. ______. Uniform law treaties: their reception, implementation, success and failure: introductory note. Japanese yearbook of international law (Tokyo) 60:4-9, 2017. Thailand. ASEAN Law Association (ALA). One step closer: promoting ASEAN integration through the harmonization of commercial law, 4–5 September 2017, Bangkok. UN Commission on International Trade Law, ed. Modernizing international trade law to support innovation and sustainable development: proceedings of the Congress of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Vienna, 4–6 July 2017, Vol. 4: papers presented at the Congress. Vienna, United Nations, 2017. 393 p. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. World SME news (Noida, India) 13-15, 2019. Voulgaris, I. Fostering the United Nations Task for Peacekeeping by implementing its auxiliary tasks for extending the economic and social development of nations and for organizing international economic activities. Czech yearbook of international law (The Hague) 9:367-388, 2018.
II. Международная купля-продажа товаров
Abera, Z. Ethiopian sales law in the light of international laws and principles of contract. Open access library journal 3:8, 2016. Al-Daboubi, D. The role of the marine carrier in operating a passage of risk in inter- national sale contract. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 5:549-589, 2018. Ashraful, M.Z. and S.R. Garimella. Bangladesh: making the case for accession to the Convention on International Contracts for Sale of Goods. AALCO journal of international law (New Delhi) 5:73-88, 2016.
V.19-02150 3/32
A/CN.9/977
Aston, J., ed. Identifying and comparing the trends in international contract laws and probing the critical issues for multinational contracting parties. Gandhinagar, India, Gujarat National Law University, 2016. 166 p. Babayev, O.T. Cфера применения конвенции ООН о договорах международной купли-продажи товаров. Problems of modern science and education (Ivanovo, Russia) 19:101:72-74, 2017. Basedow, J. International economic law and commercial contracts: promoting cross-border trade by uniform law conventions. Uniform law review = Revue de droit uniforme (Oxford, U.K.) 23:1:1-14, 2018. Basoredo-Otzerinjauregi, I. La asignación del riesgo de la contraprestación en la compraventa internacional por tipo de mercancía y modelo de contrato. Cizur Menor, Spain, Editorial Aranzadi, 2018. 276 p. Bertino, L. Breach of contract: automatic and unilateral price reduction. European review of contract law (Berlin) 14:1:24-59, 2018. Bridge, M.G. The international sale of goods. 4th ed. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 2017. 884 p. Calderón Marenco, E. Aplicación normativa de la compraventa internacional de mercaderías. Revista de derecho (Managua) 22:37-60, 2017. Castellani, L. and C. Emery. A CISG három dimenziója. Külgazdaság: jogi melléklet (Budapest) 62:1-2:1-26, 2018. Original article in English: the three dimensions of the CISG. Castineira, E. and C. Miles. International contracts in the engineering industry: ICC arbitration under the Orgalime Conditions. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 3:63-76, 2018. Conway, E.R. Implied exclusions, implicit waivers and imputed forfeiture of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:2:126-143, 2018. Dawson, G. and J. Harrison. The Convention on Contracts for the International sale of Goods: cases, materials, and problems. Durham, N.C., Carolina Academic Press, 2017. 419 p. De Oliveira Grossi Andrade, M.A. and T. Grossi Andrade. O duty to mitigate the loss no Brasil: o dever do credor de mitigar seu próprio prejuízo. Revista da Faculdade de Direito Padre Arnaldo Janssen (Belo Horizonte, Brazil) 10:10:18- 41, 2018. Translation of title: The duty to mitigate the loss in Brazil: the creditor’s duty to mitigate its own loss. Djieufack, R. Remedies for the seller’s liability for non-conformity of goods to a contract of sale of goods in the OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law: a critical appraisal. Uniform law review = Revue de droit uniforme (Oxford, U.K.) 22:3-3:614-637, 2017. Dobrynski, L. The incorporation of standard terms into international sales contracts under the CISG. Quid? 1:6-8, 2018. Durovic, M. Harmonization of contract law in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia: what can be learned from the CISG and the ECL experience? Global journal of comparative law (Leiden, The Netherlands) 7:207-231, 2018. Eicher, F. Pacta sunt servanda: contrasting disgorgement damages with efficient breaches under Article 74 CISG. LSE law review (London) 3:29-42, 2018.
4/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Ferrari, F. What is wrong with the “Transmar” decisions. New York law journal (New York) 260:48, p. 4 and 8, September 7, 2018. Fišer-Šobot, S. Open-price yговори о међународној продаји робе: однос чланова 14 и 55 Конвенције Уједињених нација о уговорима o међународној продају робe. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade = Belgrade law review (Belgrade) 66:1:180-198, 2018. In Serbian with English abstract. Translation of title: Contracts for the international sale of goods with open-price terms – an interplay between arts. 14 and 55 CISG (1980). Forestier, A. Les délais en matière de garantie des vices cachés: éclaircissements, incertitudes et perspectives. Semaine juridique (Paris) 17:828-835, 2018. Gagula, A. and V. Luković. Interpretation of contracts. South East European law journal (Skopje) 1:3:99-123, 2017. Glavanits, J., ed. A nemzetközi kereskedelmi kapcsolatok egyes aktuális kérdései. Budapest, Gondolat Kiadó, 2018. 196 p. Translation of title: Some current issues of international trade relations. Grimaldi, C. La durée de la garantie des vices cachés. Recueil Dalloz (Paris) 39:2166- 2170, 2018. Hatamzade, E. Round one: the battle of forms: effects of the implementation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods on the domestic law of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Caspian Policy Center 20 July 2018. Hayward, B. and others. The CISG and the United Kingdom: exploring coherency and private international law. International and comparative law quarterly (London) 67:3:607-641, 2018. Hellwege, P. Understanding usage in international contract law harmonization. American journal of comparative law (Cary, N.C.) 66:1:127-174, 2018. Hoang, N.T. and H.P.M. Quan. Buyer’s remedies in international sales contracts under CISG 1980 and Vietnam Commercial Law 2005: a comparative analysis. External economics review (Hanoi) 94:94, 2017. Iftime, E. Buna-credinţă în vânzarea internaţională. Acta Universitatis George Bacovia. Juridica (Bacau, Romania) 3:2:527, 2014. Translation of title: Good faith in international sales law. ______. Damages in sale contracts. Conference paper. International Conference Globalization, Intercultural Dialogue and National Identity, 28 May 2015, Tîrgu-Mureş, Romania. In Romanian with English abstract. Janssen, A. and N.G. Ahuja. Legal laboratory CISG: a successful hybrid between common law and civil law? Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:2:129-149, 2017. Jardine, E.V. Awarding disgorgement damages under Art. 74 CISG: is it time to keep up with the times? Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:1:36-65, 2017. Kızılay, A. Türk Borçlar Kanunu ile Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) hükümleri çerçevesinde satış sözleşmesinde ayıptan sorumlulukta alıcının seçtiği hakkın sonradan değiştirilebilirliği sorunu. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Ankara) 7:2:193- 210, 2017. Translation of title: Buyer remedies under the Turkish Law of Obligations and the CISG (1980).
V.19-02150 5/32
A/CN.9/977
Kröll, S. [et al.]. Cost and burden of proof under the CISG: a discussion amongst experts. International trade and business law review (Perth) 20:176-210, 2017. Landi, N. and A. Bovio. Forma, contenuto e termini della denunzia dei vizi della cosa venduta. Nuovo diritto delle società (Milano, Italy) 2:68, 2015. Translation of title: Form, content and terms of the notification of lack of conformity of goods in national and international sales. L’application du droit étranger: cycle de conférences, Cour de cassation, 2017. Paris, Société de legislation comparée, 2018. 169 p. Lassila, L. General principles and Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG): uniformity under an interpretation umbrella? Russian law journal (Moscow) 5:2:113-128, 2017. Law, T. Princípios da Convenção das Nações Unidas sobre Contratos de Compra e Venda de Mercadorias (CISG): autonomia privada, força obrigatória, preser- vação dos contratos. Revista de direito constitucional e internacional (São Paulo, Brazil) 103:347-371, 2017. Translation of title: Principles of the CISG (1980): private autonomy, mandatory force, preservation of contracts. Libal, T. and M. Pascucci. Automated reasoning in normative detachment structures with ideal conditions. 24 October 2018. Lista, A. International commercial sales: the sale of goods on shipment terms. Abing- don, U.K., Routledge, 2018. 520 p. Lorenz, S. and others, eds. Einhundert Jahre Institut für Rechtsvergleichung an der Universität München: Kaufrecht und Kollisionsrecht von Ernst Rabel bis heute. Tübingen, Germany, Mohr Siebeck, 2018. 182 p. Translation of title: 100 years Institute for Comparative Law at the University of Munich: sales law and con- flict of laws since Ernst Rabel until today. Machnikowski, P. CISG in Polish case law. Internationales Handelsrecht (Köln, Ger- many) 18:5:181-185, 2018. Magnus, U. Rabels Einfluss auf das CISG und die europäische Kaufrechts-entwicklung. In Einhundert Jahre Institut für Rechtsvergleichung an der Universität München: Kaufrecht und Kollisionsrecht von Ernst Rabel bis heute. S. Lorenz, P. Kindler, A. Dutta, eds. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2018, p. 89-110. Translation of title: Rabel’s influence on the CISG and on the develop- ment of European sales law. Maier-Lohmann, T. Neuausrichtung der Selbstvornahme und des Art. 48 Abs. 1 CISG. Internationales Handelsrecht (Köln, Germany) 18:6:225-231, 2018. Translation of title: Realignment of the seller’s remedy and of Art. 48 para 1 CISG. Malécot, L. Opting-out of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the Inter- national Sale of Goods (CISG) through conduct in litigation: what US courts need to know about the CISG. Transnational notes blog January 23, 2017. Marshall, B. The Hague Choice of Law Principles, CISG, and PICC: a hard look at a choice of soft law. American journal of comparative law (Cary, N.C.) 66:1:175- 217, 2018. Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Claude Witz. Paris, Lexis Nexis, 2018. 923 p. Meyer, P. Le droit OHADA et le droit international privé: les règles d’applicabilité du droit uniforme. Uniform law review = Revue de droit uniforme (Oxford, U.K.) 23:1:99-126, 2018.
6/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Mohs, F. Enforcing compliance with ethical standards in the supply chain: contractual remedies under the CISG. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:1:58-66, 2018. Moreno Rodríguez, J.A. The Hague Principles, the OAS Guide and the new Paraguayan law on international contracts. Curso de derecho internacional (Río de Janeiro) 44:154-173, 2017. Moser, G. Rethinking choice of law in cross-border sales. The Hague, Eleven International Publishing, 2018. 242 p. Moura Ramos, R.M. A Convenção de Viena de 1980 sobre o Contrato de Compra e Venda Internacional de Mercadorias trinta e cinco anos depois. Boletim da Faculdade de Direito (Coimbra, Portugal) 92:1:1-22, 2016. Translation of title: The CISG (1980) after 35 years. Musin, V. Offer and acceptance under the Russian Civil Code. Russian law journal (Moscow) 1:1:80-90, 2013. Neumann, T. Dominant control: a proposal for the classification of international transactions of modern software. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:2:109-128, 2017. Nie, Y. The application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods uniformity interpretation principle in U.S. Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University, 2018. 89 p. Thesis (Master) – Indiana University Maurer School of Law (2018). Nikolaidis, I. Delving into INCOTERMS® 2010: typology and critical points revisited. Thessaloniki, Greece, International Hellenic University, 2018. 53 p. Thesis (LL.M.) – School of Economics, Business Administration & Legal Studies, International Hellenic University (2018). Nwafor, N. Doctrinal watershed in the interpretation of contractual impossibility under the CISG, UNIDROIT Principles and English law. Business law review (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 38:6:219-227, 2017. Octaviandra, S. Indonesia and its reluctance to ratify the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Indonesia law review (Indonesia) 8:3:243-255, 2018. Ostendorf, P. International sales terms. 3rd ed. München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2018. 186 p. Osuntogun, A.J. Delivery of goods to carriers in international sales: an examination of what it purported to be in Nigeria. Business law review (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 39:2:44-53, 2018. Pereira Ribeiro, M.C. and L.B. Azevedo da Rocha. CISG: um caminho para a uniformização. Article submitted to XXV Congresso do CONPEDI – Curitiba: regulamentação e solução de conflitos do comércio internacional, 7–10 December 2016. Translation of title: CISG: a path to uniformization. Perović, J. Limitations of liability for loss caused by a breach of business contracts: from the perspective of the Serbian law on obligations. Original scientific paper (Belgrade) October 17, 2017. Pirozzi, R. and A. Pratticò. Intellectual property rights infringements in the international sale of goods. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:1:37-57, 2018.
V.19-02150 7/32
A/CN.9/977
Prastalo, B. Judges maximising their utility: a pitfall for the uniform interpretation of the CISG. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 20:2:17-26, 2016. Raheja, R. and others. Extent of the buyer’s obligation to comply with payment regulations under Art. 54 CISG. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:2:150-166, 2017. Schmidt, M. Ambiguous expectations in intercultural commerce: seven propositions for dealing with the challenges of intercultural communication in the realm of the CISG. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:1:67-79, 2018. Schroeter, U.G. Applicability of UNCITRAL’s Sales Convention of 1980 and its Limitation Convention of 1974/1980 via “Rules of Private International Law”: remarks on occasion of Czechia’s declaration withdrawals. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:1:14-36, 2018. ______. Does the 1980 Vienna Sales Convention reflect universal values?: the use of the CISG as a model for law reform and regional specificities. Loyola of Los Angeles international and comparative law journal (Los Angeles, Calif.) 41:1:1-50, 2018. Schwenzer, I. The CISG Advisory Council. Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 22:1:1-13, 2018. Selanik, A.A. and others. Viyana Satım Antlaşması’nın (CISG) tarihsel gelişimi ve uygulama alanı. Gaziantep University journal of social sciences (Gaziantep, Turkey) 17:4:1353-1367, 2018. Translation of title: Historical development and implementation area of the CISG (1980). Sengthongkham, K. ความเหมาะสมของ สปป ลาวในการเข้าเป็นภาคี อนุสัญญา สหประชาชาติว่าดว้ ยสญั ญาซอื้ ขายสนิ คา้ ระหว่างประเทศ ค.ศ. 1980. Graduate law journal (Bangkok) 11:3:708-720, 2018. Translation of title: Appropriateness for Lao PDR to accede to the CISG (1980). Şenocak, K. and A. Yarayan. Sachmängelhaftung des Verkäufers beim Handelskauf nach türkischem Recht. Internationales Handelsrecht (Köln, Germany) 18:3:93- 100, 2018. Translation of title: Product liability of the seller when trading under Turkish law. Shabani, F. Non-conformity of goods in light of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Law on Obligations of the Republic of Macedonia as part of South-Eastern European law. Academic journal of interdisciplinary studies (Rome) 4:2:85-88, 2015. Shachmurove, A. Here lions roam: CISG as the measure of a claim’s value and validity and a debtor’s dischargeability. Emory bankruptcy development journal (Atlanta, Ga.) 34:461-520, 2018. Shreedhar, A. Feasibility of “covering values” in transnational commercial law: Article 79 of the CISG and the “impediment.” Global journal of comparative law (Leiden, The Netherlands) 5:2:183-207, 2016. Song, Y.H. CISG in Korea’s courts. Korean journal of international trade and business law (Seoul) 27:2:39-78, 2018. In Korean with English abstract. Svĕráková Čechová, J. Význam výhrady podle článku 95 pro aplikaci Úmluvy OSN o smlouvách o mezinárodní koupi zboží. Časopis pro právní vĕdu a praxi (Brno,
8/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Czech Republic) 20:2:169-175, 2012. Translation of title: The meaning of the reservation under Article 95 of the CISG (1980). Tagung zum UN-Kaufrecht für liechtensteinische Industrieunternehmen, Universität Liechtenstein, 13 June 2018. Vaduz, Universität Liechtenstein, 2018. Ugarte Mostajo, D. La mitigación de daños en la responsabilidad por incumplimiento contractual: breve análisis comparado en el derecho civil de Argentina y Perú. Revista derecho Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) (Lima) 80:119-159, 2018. Uslubaş, R. Die Rang- und Vorrangstellung des CISG nach türkischem Recht. Internationales Handelsrecht (Köln, Germany) 18:3:100-105, 2018. Translation of title: Rank and priority of the CISG (1980) under Turkish law. Vásquez Palma, M.F. and Á. Vidal Olivares. Diálogos entre la Convención sobre la Compraventa Internacional de Mercaderías y la lex mercatoria. Revista de derecho privado (Bogotá) 34:233-275, 2018. Wade, G. A matter of interpretation: constructing and interpreting commercial contracts under the common law and the Convention on the International Sale of Goods. Global journal of comparative law (Leiden, The Netherlands) 4:1:1- 42, 2015. Walt, S. Importing uniform sales law into Article 2. Barry law review (Miami Shores, Fla.) 23:2:179-192, 2018. Wang, X. and others. Anticipatory breach of contract in the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. Journal of simulation 6:3:45-50, 2018. Wethmar-Lemmer, M. Harmonising or unifying the law applicable to international sales contracts between the BRICS states. Comparative and international journal of Southern Africa (Pretoria) 50:3:372-394, 2017. Whitlock, A.J. and B.S. Abbey. Who’s afraid of the CISG?: why North Carolina practitioners should learn a thing or two about the 1980 United Nations Convention on the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. Campbell law review (Raleigh, N.C.) 30:2:275-295, 2008. Witz, C. and B. Köhler. Droit uniforme de la vente internationale de marchandises: janvier 2017–juin 2018. Recueil Dalloz (Paris) 194:36:1986-1999, 2018. Zapata Giraldo, A. and others, eds. Contratación internacional: tratados e instrumentos normativos. Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2018. 371 p. Zaynutdinov, A.K. Внешнеторговые договора о некоторых особенностях оговорки «обстоятельства непреодолимой силы (форс-мажор)» и «существенное изменение обстоятельств». Virtus Leo blog 2018. Zeller, B. Penalty clauses: what has changed? Pace international law review (White Plains, N. Y.) 30:1:147-174, 2017. Zenteno Trejo, B.Y. La convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre los contratos de compraventa internacional de mercaderías: su estudio, aplicación e interpretación judicial y arbitral en México. Revista de derecho (Montevideo) 14:18:199-228, 2018.
V.19-02150 9/32
A/CN.9/977
III. Международный коммерческий арбитраж и согласительная процедура
Abu-Manneh, R. and R. O’Grady. Jurisdictional considerations: a global guide to arbitration, Europe. Mealey’s international arbitration report (King of Prussia, Pa.) 34:1:35-37, 2019. Ademi, A. Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards anulled in the country of origin. Vizione (Tetova, Macedonia) 25:147-156, 2016. In Macedonian with English title and abstract. Ademi, A. Shkaqet për anulimin e vendimeve të arbitrazhit. Vizione (Tetova, Macedonia) 22:183-194, 2014. In Macedonian with English abstract. Translation of title: Grounds for setting aside of the arbitral awards. Al Tamimi & Co, ed. Arbitration reference guide: conventions, laws, rules and guidelines relating to international arbitration and practice. Dubai, Al Tamimi & Co, 2018. Al Tamini, E. and A. Hassan. UAE’s free-standing arbitration law. International journal of Arab arbitration (Beirut) 9:2:7-11, 2017. Alexander, N., ed. A convention on the enforcement of iMSAs ... and a ne w model law. Kluwer mediation blog March 16, 2018. Al-Hawamdeh, A.M. and others. The effects of arbitrator’s lack of impartiality and independence on the arbitration proceedings and the task of arbitrators under the UNCITRAL Model Law. Journal of politics and law (Toronto) 11:3:64-73, 2018. Ali, S.F. and O.G. Repousis. Investor-State mediation and the rise of transparency in international investment law: opportunity or threat? Denver journal of international law and policy (Denver, Colo.) 45:2:225-249, 2017. Armbrüster, C. Arbitrators’ remuneration in discontinued proceedings. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:1:129-142, 2018. Arroyo, M., ed. Arbitration in Switzerland: the practitioner’s guide. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 2018. 2 vols. Atlanta International Arbitration Society (AtlAS) and Atlanta Center for International Arbitration and Mediation (ACIAM), eds. International dispute resolution resource manual. 2nd ed. Athens, Ga., Institute of Continuing Legal Education in Georgia, 2018. 492 p. Baró Huelmo, C. There and back again: ¿De vuelta a la litigación para disputas transfronterizas? Spain arbitration review (Madrid) 32:9-21, 2018. Bell, G.F., ed. The UNCITRAL Model Law and Asian arbitration laws: implementation and comparisons. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, 2018. 442 p. Bělohlávek, A.J. Nature and essence of annulment of arbitral awards against backdrop of international standards. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:21-40, 2018. Benedettelli, M.V. Il (risolvibile) puzzle del rapporto tra arbitrato internazionale e insolvenze transfrontaliere nel diritto europeo. Rivista dell’arbitrato (Milano) 28:3:439-457, 2018. Translation of title: The (solvable) puzzle of the relationship between international arbitration and cross-border insolvencies in European law.
10/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Bethencourt-Rodríguez, G. and D. Agulló-Agulló. Reconocimiento y ejecución internacional de los laudos arbitrales anulados: un análisis crítico. Revista jurídica Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Madrid) 34:343-372, 2016. Bizikova, L. Overcoming due process paranoia: expeditiousness as a new principle of international arbitration. Cahiers de l’arbitrage = Paris journal of international arbitration (Paris) 4:593-612, 2017. Blair, C. and others. The medium is the message: establishing a system of business and human rights through contract law and arbitration. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:4:379-412, 2018. Bodzási, B., ed. Tanulmánykötet a Kereskedelmi Választottbíróságról = collection of essays of the Commercial Arbitral Court. Budapest, Magyar Közlöny Lap- és Könyvkiadó Kft, 2018. 240 p. Bolatoğlu, H. Rekabet uyuşmazlıklarının tahkime elverişliliğine ilişkin hukuki çerçeve. Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Ankara) 7:2:305-332, 2017. Translation of title: Legal framework concerning arbitrability of competition disputes. Boltenko, O. Can or should parties be able to waive the right to set aside an arbitral award? Asian dispute review (Hong Kong) 119-124, 2018. Boulle, L. and J. Qin. Globalising mediated settlement agreements. Journal of international and comparative law (Queens, N.Y.) 3:33-54, 2016. Bremer, N. Seeking recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments and arbitral awards in the GCC countries. McGill journal of dispute resolution (Montréal) 3:37-65, 2016-2017. Browne, O. and R. Price. Saving time and money by sanctioning bad behaviour. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:4, September 2018. Bühler, M.W. Out of Africa: the 2018 OHADA arbitration and mediation law reform. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:5:517-540, 2018. Bühler, M.W. and A.-S. Gidoin. Le 10ème Acte Uniforme de l’OHADA sur la médiation. Lexbase édition OHADA no. 13, 12 juillet 2018. ______. Le défi de la complémentarité entre le juge et l’arbitre dans l’espace OHADA. Penant: revue trimestrielle de droit africain (Paris) 904:273-293, 2018. Butler, P. and C. Katerndahl. Kastom: a public policy exception under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Indian journal of arbitration law (Jodhpur) 7:1:104-119, 2018. Calavros, C. The application of substantive mandatory rules in international commercial arbitration from the perspective of an EU UNCITRAL Model Law jurisdiction. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:2:219-240, 2018. Cantuarias Salaverry, F. and J.L. Repetto Deville. Aplicación de la Convención de Nueva York por las cortes Latinoamericanas. Ius et veritas (Lima) 55:198-222, 2017. Caprasse, O. and M. Piers. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: the application of the New York Convention by national courts: Belgium. In Rapports belges au congrès de l’Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé à Vienne. E. Dirix, Y-H. Leleu, eds. Bruxelles, Editions Bruylant, 2018, p. 47–74.
V.19-02150 11/32
A/CN.9/977
Carrara, C. New York Convention 60 years later: a neverending search for a balance between comitas and internationality. Rivista dell’arbitrato (Milano, Italy) 28:1:41-59, 2018. Cavalieros, P. and J. Kim. Emergency arbitrators versus the courts: from concurrent jurisdiction to practical considerations. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:3:275-306, 2018. Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), ed. Reshaping trade through women’s economic empowerment: special report. Waterloo, Ont., Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), 2018. 84 p. Charlotin, D. and L.E. Peterson. New proposed ICSID arbitration rules introduce a mediation option, address arbitrator ethics and clarify power to set conditions for stays of enforcement. Investment arbitration reporter (New York) 6 August 2018. Chong, W. Arbitrating in harmony: the effect of the Model Law on the choice of seat of arbitration. Perth international law journal (Crawley, W.A.) 1:82-100, 2016. Chua, E. A contribution to the conversation on mixing the modes of mediation and arbitration: of definitional consistency and process structure. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:5, October 2018. Clay, T. and S. Mazzantini. Ragioni e incoerenze in tema di exequatur di lodi stranieri. Rivista dell’arbitrato (Milano) 28:3:481-491, 2018. Translation of title: Reasons and inconsistencies on the subject of exequatur of foreign awards. Corby, B. and others. 25th Annual Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot, 22–29 March 2018, Vienna (Austria). Crawford, D.S. Inextricably intertwined: the New York Convention, FAA, and non-signatory third parties. Tulane maritime law journal (New Orleans, La.) 43:115-141, 2018. Crocket, A. and M. De Sousa. Arbitrating business and human rights disputes: viable for victims? Asian dispute review (Hong Kong) 104-111, 2018. Cuperlier, O. L’Acte uniforme du 23 novembre 2017 relatif à la médiation dans l’espace OHADA. Cahiers de l’arbitrage = Paris journal of international arbitration (Paris) 2:241-253, 2018. Czernich, D. The theory of separability in Austrian arbitration law: is it on stable pillars? Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:3:463-468, 2018. Daradkeh, L. Constitutionality of Article VII of the New York Convention of 1958 under Egyptian and Jordanian law. Arab law quarterly (Leiden, The Netherlands) 32:4:501-516, 2018. Davydenko, D. Russia and the UNCITRAL instruments on enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements resulting from mediation. In New horizons of international arbitration: issue 4: collection of articles. A.V. Asoskov, A.I. Muranov, R.M. Khodykin, eds. Moscow, Association of Private International and Comparative Law Studies, 2018, p. 106–127. Do, V.D. Plaidoyer pour le renvoi de la sentence à l’arbitre, alternative au recours en annulation dans les pays de civil law. Revue de l’arbitrage (Paris) 2:337-359, 2018. Dogauchi, M. Reform of the JCAA Arbitration Rules: three sets of rules in response to all business needs. JCA journal (Tokyo) 1:6-15, 2019. In Japanese.
12/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Drličková, K. and T. Kyselovská, eds. Cofola International 2017: resolution of international disputes (conference proceedings). Brno, Czech Republic, Masaryk University, 2017. 106 p. Duarte, M. Could blockchain become the new standard for transparency in investment arbitration? Kluwer arbitration blog October 15, 2018. Dyson, J.A. The proper limits of arbitrators’ immunity: the Master’s Lecture, the Worshipful Company of Arbitrators, 13 March 2018. Arbitration (London) 84:3:196-204, 2018. El Ahdab, A.H. اتفاقیة نیویورك والعالقة بین قرارات قاضي بلد منشأ الحكم التحكیمي وقرارات قاضي بلد تنفیذ الحكم التحكیمي World journal of arbitration (Beirut) 39-40:189-210, 2018. Fox, E. and C. Morgan. Blockchain and the changing face of energy contracts and disputes. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:7, December 2018. Gaillard, E. La vision américaine des sentences annulées au siège. Revue de l’arbitrage (Paris) 4:1147-1165, 2017. García Cueto, J.I. and others. Reconocimiento y ejecución de laudos arbitrales anulados en la sede del arbitraje. Cuadernos de derecho transnacional (Madrid) 8:1:101-110, 2016. Giaretta, B. Project management in international arbitration. McGill journal of dispute resolution (Montréal) 3:66-85, 2016–2017. Goldbeck, A. von. L’indemnisation du non-respect des clauses compromissoires. Revue internationale de droit comparé (Paris) 70:2:237-247, 2018. Grané Labat, P. and others. Enforcing international arbitral awards in U.S. courts. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 1:32-44, 2017. Grisel, F. Treaty-making between public authority and private interests: the genealogy of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. European journal of international law (Oxford, U.K.) 28:1:73-87, 2017. Haller, H.A. and A. Keilmann. In claimant’s hands?: admissibility and consequences of a withdrawal of claim in international arbitration. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:6:649-664, 2018. Henriques, D.G. Penalty clauses in international arbitration: a comparative snapshot. World arbitration and mediation review (Huntington, N.Y.) 11:4:419-452, 2017. Hérisset, B. La Convention de New York dans la modernité. Bulletin ERSUMA de pratique professionnelle (Yaoundé) 12:4-5, 2018. Hess, B. Procedural challenges and changes: commercial versus public law disputes settlement. Recueil des cours = Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Leiden, The Netherlands) 388:185-213, 2016. Hill, J. Claims that an arbitral tribunal failed to deal with an issue: the setting aside of awards under the Arbitration Act 1996 and the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:3:385-414, 2018.
V.19-02150 13/32
A/CN.9/977
______. Is an interim measure of protection ordered by an arbitral tribunal an arbitral award? Journal of international dispute settlement (Oxford, U.K.) 9:4:590-608, 2018. Howes, B.T. and others. Jurisdictional considerations: a global guide to arbitration, the Americas. Mealey’s international arbitration report (Philadelphia, Pa.) 33:11:26-28, 2018. Hučková, R. Nútený výkon rozhodcovských rozsudkov v teórií a praxi: cez prizmu historického vývoja (najmä rímsko-právnych súvislostí) a potreby aktuálnej praxe. In Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Faculty of Law. Reviewed proceedings of scientific papers. T. Hisemová, D. Kmecová, eds. Kosice, 2018, p. 60–67. Translation of title: Enforcement of arbitral awards in theory and practice. Idornigie, P.O. Commercial arbitration law and practice in Nigeria. Abuja, Law Lords Publications, 2015. 443 p. Jaime, M.-L. The law governing counsel’s ethical obligations in international arbitration. European international arbitration review (Huntington, N.Y.) 7:1:23-42, 2018. Jiménez, D. Proposal for a uniform rule on arbitrator immunity. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 4:8-16, 2017. Jon, W.-J. Interim measures in arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards in Korea and China. Journal of arbitration studies (Seoul) 26:3:67-91, 2016. Kasolowsky, B. and C. Kittelmann. The UNCITRAL Transparency Rules: some thoughts on timing and costs implications in investment treaty arbitration. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:4, September 2018. Khan, A. and V. Panikkar. Enforcement of interim orders granted by foreign seated arbitral tribunals in India: a classic case of close, but not quite. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:2, February 2018. Kozuka, S. and H. Shinomiya. Harmonised rules for emerging private initiatives in space?: in quest of fair, equitable and commercially viable rules for extraterrestrial mining. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:229-248, 2018. Kröll, S. Die schiedsrechtliche Rechtsprechung 2016 und 2017. SchiedsVZ (München) 16:4:201-219, 2018. Translation of title: Jurisprudence in arbitration 2016 und 2017. Kurochkin, S.A. Arbitral awards: substantive requirements, legal effects and optimal means of recourse. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:109-134, 2018. Lambrecht, P. and E. Peetermans. Brussels International Business Court: vers un tribunal commercial international anglophone à Bruxelles. Juriste international (Paris) 1:80-82, 2018. Lefebvre, P. and D. De Meulemeester. The New York Convention: an autopsy of its structure and modus operandi. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:4:413-438, 2018. Lin, T. Making it a treaty obligation: enforcement of mediated settlement agreements under the ARMO. Asian journal of WTO and international health law and policy (Taipei City) 13:1:119-134, 2018.
14/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Loquin, E. La traduction dans l’arbitrage international. Revue de l’arbitrage (Paris) 2:319-335, 2018. Malov, O.A. Тенденции развития международного коммерческого арбитража в Латинской Америке: правовые аспекты. Moscow journal of international law (Moscow) 107:3:69-81, 2017. Marisi, F. Reforming investor-state arbitration to harmonize investment law: issues, challenges and directions. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:47-80, 2018. Markert, L. Efficiency and investment arbitration: new developments and the need for a multi-dimensional approach. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:4, September 2018. Maurer, A.G. Settling international commercial disputes through arbitration. Comparative law yearbook of international business (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 40:149-164, 2018. Maxwell, W. and G. Vannieuwenhuyse. Robots replacing arbitrators: smart contract arbitration. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 1:24-33, 2018. Maynard, S. Laying the fourth arbitrator to rest: re-evaluating the regulation of arbitral secretaries. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:2:173-183, 2018. Meidanis, H. International enforcement of mediated settlement agreements: two and a half models – why and how to enforce internationally mediated settlement agreements. Arbitration (London) 85:1:49-64, 2019. Menon, S., ed. Arbitration in Singapore: a practical guide. 2nd ed. Singapore, Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2018. 1086 p. Meza-Salas, M.M. Los 60 años de la Convención de Nueva York y la práctica jurisprudencial internacional frente al reconocimiento y ejecución de laudos extranjeros anulados en la sede del arbitraje. University of Miami international and comparative law review (Coral Gables, Fla.) 25:2:227-262, 2018. Millett, P., ed. The encyclopedia of forms and precedents: volume 3(1), arbitration and alternative dispute resolution; auctioneers, estate agents and valuers; bailment. 5th ed. London, LexisNexis, 2018. 653 p. Mohebbi, M. and M. Asgharian. The role of arbitrators in effective time and cost reduction. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:4, September 2018. Mouland, S.T. Comparing the role of the courts in English and German arbitration law: should party autonomy or certainty preferred. Asian law students’ association (Indonesia) 144-160, 2015. Nadeau-Séguin, S. Ontario adopts a new International Commercial Arbitration Act. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 3:14-17, 2017. Nadkarni, N. and L.T. Wei. Reimagining transparency: enhancing systemic governance and actual legitimacy in investment arbitration. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:1-28, 2018. Navarro Jiménez, S. Procedimientos abreviados: ¿lo bueno, si breve, dos veces bueno? Spain arbitration review (Madrid) 33:81-95, 2018.
V.19-02150 15/32
A/CN.9/977
Nazzini, R. Enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel, and abuse of process in a transnational context? American journal of comparative law (Washington, D.C.) 66:3:603-638, 2018. Nguyen, L.G.T. Phán quyết trọng tài nước ngoài theo Công ước New York 1958, thực tiễn áp dụng tại một số quốc gia và đề xuất áp dụng tại Việt Nam. Tap chi toa an nhan dan (Vietnam) 1:3:1-8, 2018. Translation of title: Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention 1958 in some countries and Vietnam. Noussia, K. Bias of arbitrators revisited. Journal of business law (London) 4:344-366, 2018. ______. The Arbitration Act 1996: time for reform? Journal of business law (London) 2:140-162, 2019.
Obi, S. 国際投資仲裁 の基礎. Kokusai shōji hōmu Tokyo) 1 (45:4:487-497), 2 (45:5:667-673), 3 (45:6:823-829), 4 (45:7:967-975), 5 (45:8:1139-1146), 6 (45:9:1287-1294), 7 (45:10:1432-1437), 8 (45:11:1573-1581), 9 (45:12:1727- 1734, 2017), 10 (46:1:53-60, 2018), 11 (46:2:199-207), 12 (46:3:357-361), 13 (46:4:507-513. In Japanese. Translation of title: Basics of international investment arbitration. Orekhov, A.U. Реформирование требований к форме арбитражного соглашения. Conference paper, p. 527–530. Osman, F. and N. Brahmi Zaouaoui. L’arbitrage institutionnel: regards croisés Europe, Afrique, MENA. Colloque de Tunis du 27 avril 2018. Etat des lieux et recommandations légistiques. Revue de droit des affaires internationales = International business law journal (Paris) 4:409-420, 2018. Parlett, K. Parties’ engagement with experts in international litigation. Journal of international dispute settlement (Oxford, U.K.) 9:3:440-452, 2018. Paulsson, J. and G. Petrochilos. UNCITRAL arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, 2018. 633 p. Paulsson, M.R.P. The blockchain ADR: bringing international arbitration to the new age. Kluwer arbitration blog October 9, 2018. Pennicott, I. Why are there so many sets of arbitration rules? Asian dispute review (Hong Kong) 69-73, April 2018. Pereira, S. Deferred challenges to jurisdiction under the Model Law. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:6:719-731, 2018. Petrochilos, G. Transparency in commercial arbitrations involving states. Cahiers de l’arbitrage = Paris journal of international arbitration (Paris) 1:19-24, 2018. Piers, M. and C. Aschauer, eds. Arbitration in the digital age: the brave new world of arbitration. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, 2018. 314 p. Pislevik, S. Precedent and development of law: is it time for greater transparency in international commercial arbitration? Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:2:241-260, 2018. Platte, M. and P. Schwarz. Decisions infra petita as grounds for the setting aside of arbitral awards. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:207-219, 2018.
16/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Prekop, R. and P. Petho. The standard of reasoning in arbitral awards. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:157-184, 2018. Qouteshat, O.H. Challenges of authentication and certification of e-awards in Dubai and before the Dubai International Financial Centre courts: the electronic signature. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 13:97-112, 2016. Qouteshat, O.H. and K.J. Alawamleh. The enforceability of electronic arbitration agreements before the DIFC courts and Dubai courts. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 14:47-60, 2017. Quintana Sánchez, A. Márgenes de la irritualidad del proceso arbitral. Revista arbitraje PUCP (Lima) 6:169-174, 2016. Rai, S. and A. Dwivedi. Looking through the transnational theory of arbitration: imagining future possibilities for Indian law. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:2, February 2018. Rajoo, S. and T.R. Klötzel. UNCITRAL Model Law & Arbitration Rules: the Arbitration Act 2005 (amended 2011 & 2018) and the AIAC Arbitration Rules 2018. Malaysia, Thomson Reuters Asia, 2019. 931 p. Ramirez, M.E. and D. Tagtachian. The precedential effect of increasing transparency. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 2:41-47, 2017. Sajjad Ahmad, R. Pakistan’s legal framework for international arbitration and seminal judgments of the supreme court. International journal of Arab arbitration (Beirut) 9:2:29-39, 2017. Salehijam, M. A call for a harmonized approach to agreements to mediate. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:1, addendum, June 2018. Schmidt-Ahrendts, N. and A. De Jong. The “right” place of arbitration: how Germany might profit from Brexit. SchiedsVZ (München) 16:5:281-288, 2018. Schnabel, T. The Singapore Convention on Mediation: a framework for the cross-border recognition and enforcement of mediated settlements. Social science research network September 18, 2018. Seriki, H. Enforcing annulled arbitral awards: can the unruly horse be tamed? Journal of business law (London) 8:679-701, 2018. Serpa Soares, M. de. 51st Session of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law: New York Convention 60th Anniversary, address in New York, 28 June 2018. Sesin-Tabarelli, A. Extension of the arbitration agreement to non-signatories: landscape of legal theories and jurisdictional approaches. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 4:17-24, 2017. Seyadi, R. Enforcement of arbitral awards annulled by the court of the seat. Arbitration (London) 84:2:128-141, 2018. Sharma, A. Securing the costs of an investment treaty claim: how has the trend emerged and has it added to the unlevelled playing field of investment treaty arbitrations? Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:1:66-82, 2017.
V.19-02150 17/32
A/CN.9/977
Sharma, M.C. and J. Balakrishna. The foreign investor and the host nation: investor-state arbitration: an analysis, focus: India’s investment treaty law and policy. Bangalore, India, Jurists Bangalore Press Pvt. Ltd., 2018. 647 p. Sharma, S. Due process “paranoia”: turning away from judicial attitudes and looking for answers within. Arbitration (London) 84:4:314-325, 2018. Shenoy, N.C. Public policy under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention: is there a transnational standard? Cardozo journal of conflict resolution (New York) 20:77-103, 2018. Sim, C. Will artificial intelligence take over arbitration? Asian international arbitration journal (Singapore) 14:1:1-14, 2018. Smith, G. Comparative analysis of joinder and consolidation provisions under leading arbitral rules. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:2:173-202, 2018. Sojka, Š. Selected aspects of the public policy exception in the 1958 New York Convention. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:255-278, 2018. Sorieul, R. and J.S. Lee. ICC and UNCITRAL: makers of norms in international arbitration. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 2:27-35, 2018. Soto Coaguila, C.A., ed. Arbitraje comercial y arbitraje de inversión: el arbitraje en el Perú y el mundo. Lima, Instituto Peruano de Arbitraje, 2008. 997 p. Strong, S.I. Rationality revisited: a response to Professor Greenberg. Washington and Lee law review online (Lexington, Va.) 74:1:184-206, 2017. Subramanian, S.R. Anti-arbitration injunctions and their compatibility with the New York Convention and the Indian law or arbitration: future directions for Indian law and policy. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:2:185-217, 2018.
Sun, W. 联合国关于调解所产生的国际和解协议公约立法背景及条文释义. Beijing, Law Press, 2018. 384 p. Sussman, E. The Singapore Convention: promoting the enforcement and recognition of international mediated settlement agreements. ICC dispute resolution bulletin (Paris) 3:42-54, 2018. Tan Chiang Huat, E. International commercial arbitration: it’s time to ease the legal tangle by authorizing amiable compositeur for the arbitral tribunal. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:281-295, 2018. Tan, D.I. “Enforcing” national court judgments as arbitration awards under the New York Convention. Arbitration international (Oxford, U.K.) 34:3:415-443, 2018. Tannous, S. and others. The new UAE Federal Arbitration Law: was it worth the wait? ASA bulletin (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 36:4:866-894, 2018. Trakman, L.E. Aligning state sovereignty with transnational public policy. Tulane law review (New Orleans, La.) 93:2:207-267, 2018. Tsakiri, D.A. Application of the New York Convention to the enforcement of arbitration agreements. ASA bulletin (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 36:2:364-376, 2018. Tubishat, B.M. and K.F. Qandah. The role of emergency arbitrator in commercial arbitration: (comparative study). Journal of politics and law (Toronto, Ont.) 11:4:94-101, 2018.
18/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
UN Commission on International Trade Law, ed. Third conference for a Euro-Mediterranean community of international arbitration, Milan, Italy, 18 January 2017. New York, United Nations, 2018. 70 p. Uvarov, S. and O. Maslov. Legal controversies in challenges to separate jurisdictional awards. Czech (& Central European) yearbook of arbitration (The Hague) 8:279-296, 2018. Uwem, N. Bg Group v. Argentina: a reiteration of undesired complexity for a simple principle: Kompetenz-Kompetenz under the FAA and the UNCITRAL Model Law. University of Miami international and comparative law review (Coral Gables, Fla.) 25:409-454, 2018. Verbist, H. UNCITRAL instruments on enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements resulting from mediation. Forum for International Conciliation and Arbitration (FICA) paper 9 January 2018. ______. UNCITRAL Working Group II: instruments on the enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements resulting from mediation. Forum for International Conciliation and Arbitration (FICA) paper 2018. Villaggi, F. Recent developments in the arbitration legislation in Argentina. Journal of international arbitration (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 35:2:225- 252, 2018. Walker, J. Specialised international courts: keeping arbitration on top of its game. Arbitration (London) 85:1:2-23, 2019. Wang, H. Multidimensional thinking about the “soft laws” phenomena in international commercial arbitration: a Chinese perspective. ASA bulletin (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 36:3:615-626, 2018. Webster, T.H. Handbook of UNCITRAL arbitration: commentary, precedents and materials. 2nd ed. London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2015. 1023 p. Webster, T.H. and M.W. Bühler. Handbook of ICC arbitration: commentary and materials. 4th ed. London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2018. 879 p. Williams, D.A.R. and A. Kawharu. Williams & Kawharu on arbitration. 2nd ed. Wellington, LexisNexis, 2017. 1060 p. Wilske, S. and others. Entwicklungen in der internationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit im Jahr 2017 und Ausblick auf 2018. SchiedsVZ (München) 16:3:134-158, 2018. Translation of title: Developments in international arbitration during 2017 and outlook on 2018. Winarta, F.H. Enforcement of international arbitration award in arbitration practice in Indonesia. Indonesia arbitration quarterly newsletter (Jakarta) 9:4:1-4, 2017. Xia, X. Implementation of the New York Convention in China. Arbitration brief (Washington, D.C.) 1:1:20-240, 2011. Yoon, W. and others. Recognition and enforcement of the exemplary damages portion of an international arbitration award in Korean courts. Korean arbitration review (Seoul) 9:10-15, 2017. Yu, H.-L. Three may not be a crowd: who is in the driver’s seat under s.9 of the Contract (Third Party Rights) Act 2017. Journal of business law (London) 7:539-558, 2018.
V.19-02150 19/32
A/CN.9/977
______. Who is in?: who is out? How the UNCITRAL Transparency Rules can influence the upcoming amendments of the ICSID Arbitration Rules. Contemporary Asia arbitration journal (Taipei, Taiwan) 11:1:45-72, 2018. Zadeh, A.D. and S. Farhangpur. A comparative study of separability of arbitration clause under main contract of LICA and the UNCITRAL Model Law. Ius humani (Quito) 7:37-52, 2018. Zapata Giraldo, A. and others, eds. Contratación internacional: tratados e instrumentos normativos. Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2018. 371 p. Zeiler, G., ed. Austrian arbitration law: commentary. Vienna; Graz, Neuer wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2016. 301 p. Интервью с А.С. Комаровым о 25-летии Закона РФ «О международном коммерческом арбитраже», о 60-летии Нью-Йоркской конвенции, о судьбах арбитража в России и не только об этом. International commercial arbitration review (Moscow) 16:1:18-49, 2018.
IV. Международные перевозки
Badiola Coca, S.P. Algunas consideraciones sobre el régimen de la responsabilidad civil del porteador en la legislación marítima de Émiratos Árabes Unidos. Cuadernos de derecho transnacional (Madrid) 9:2:151-173, 2017. Bergami, R. The Rotterdam Rules and negotiable electronic transport documents in letter of credit business. Conference paper. Proceedings knowledge management 5th international conference 2010, 25–27 May 2010, Malaysia. Bury, D.A. Electronic bills of lading: a never-ending story? Tulane maritime law journal (New Orleans, La.) 41:197-238, 2016. Derkach, E. and S. Pavliuk. International law on the multimodal carriage of goods: recent trends and perspectives. International journal of legal studies (Warsaw) 2:2:269-285, 2017. Doan, T.M.A. Switching paper to electronic bills of lading: legal perspective and reform options for Vietnam. Malmö, Sweden, World Maritime University, 2018. 54 p. Thesis (MSc) – World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden (2018). Furrer, A. and L. Müller. “Functional equivalence” of digital transactions: a fundamental principle for assessing the legal validity of legal institutions and legal transactions under Swiss law. Jusletter (Bern) 18 June 2018. Giunta, L. The liability of the carrier in case of damage, loss or delay in the Rotterdam Rules: the system of the excepted perils in Article 17. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 1:39-93, 2015. Guo, P. Study on relevant legal issues concerned with the carriage of dangerous goods by sea: from view of judicial cases in China. Asian business lawyer (Seoul) 20:51-72, 2017. Hu, X. Equality of bargaining power in contracts for international liner shipping. WMU journal of maritime affairs (Heidelberg, Germany) 17:3:347-375, 2018. Kah Wai, T. Being seaworthy in Singapore: a brief critique of Article 14 of the Rotterdam Rules. Singapore law review, juris illuminae (Singapore) 9, February 13, 2018.
20/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Kovács, V. A tengeri fuvarozó felelősségének változásai. In Állandóság és változás: tanulmányok a magánjogi felelősség köréből. J. Fazekas, Á. Kőhidi, B. Csitei, eds. Budapest, Gondolat Kiadó, 2017, p. 132-155. Translation of title: Changes in maritime carrier liability. ______. Rotterdam ante portas, avagy a Rotterdami Egyezmény és a multimodális tengeri fuvarjog. Jog-állam-politika (Győr, Hungary) 8:3:109-140, 2016. Translation of title: Rotterdam ante portas or the Rotterdam Rules and multimodal maritime transport law. Lee, U.P. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records: another failure or a facilitator for the use of electronic bills of lading? Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 5:591-631, 2018. Li, B. and J. Jiao. The provisions relating to the identity of the controlling party in the Rotterdam Rules and their potential influences on Chinese cargo interests. Revue juridique Themis (Montréal) 51:1:245-273, 2017. Orrù, E. Containerization: effects on the contracts of carriage by sea and of sale involved in an international trade operation. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 4:271-286, 2017. Osuntogun, A.J. Delivery of goods to carriers in international sales: an examination of what it purported to be in Nigeria. Business law review (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) 39:2:44-53, 2018. Pejovic, C. The basis of carrier’s liability: from Roman law to the Rotterdam Rules. Asian business lawyer (Seoul) 20:15-36, 2017. Rabe, D. and others. Seehandelsrecht: Fünftes Buch des Handelsgesetzbuches mit Nebenvorschriften und Internationalen Übereinkommen. 5th ed. München, Beck, 2018. 1801 p. Translation of title: Maritime trade law. Rajput, T. and A. Basu Bal. Recent initiatives in trade, transport and e-commerce laws to integrate the physical, financial and information flows in international supply chains. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 1:575-621, 2015. Saive, D. Das Blockchain-Traditionspapier: die transportrechtlichen Traditions-papiere vor dem Hintergrund neuer Technologien. Transportrecht (Köln, Germany) 41:6:234-238, 2018. Translation of title: Blockchain-based transferable document: traditional transport law papers in light of new technologies. Sturley, M.F. Bringing carriage of goods into the twenty-first century. National University of Singapore (NUS) law working paper 2018/007 NUS Centre for maritime law working paper 18/01 (Singapore) March 2018. Thinking outside the box. Economist (London) 18–20, 28 April 2018. Zhao, L. An analysis of transport documents and electronic transport records under the Rotterdam Rules. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 2:1-27, 2016.
V.19-02150 21/32
A/CN.9/977
V. Международные платежи (включая независимые гарантии и резервные аккредитивы)
Abdolahi, M. تحلیل مسئولیت حقوقی بانک انتقالدهنده در انتقال الکترونیکی وجوه Journal encyclopedia of economic law (Iran) 24:12:43-66, 2017. Translation of title: The explanation of the legal liability of the transferring bank in the electronic funds transfer. Dhingra, J. Are the state regulators being challenged or undermined by financial technology and borderless digital payment platforms? Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:169-180, 2018. Marxen, K. Demand guarantees in the construction industry: a comparative legal study of their use and abuse from a South African, English and German perspective. Baden-Baden, Germany, Nomos, 2018. 355 p. Renna, M. La garanzia autonoma: spunti dai modelli uniformi. Comparazione e diritto civile (Salerno, Italy) 1:157-187, 2018. Translation of title: Independent guarantees: hints from uniform models. Rodner S., J.-O. Garantías independientes a primer requerimiento. Barcelona, ICC Spain, 2018. 386 p.
VI. Электронная торговля
Al Azzam, F.A.F. The authentic of the electronic signature in Jordanian law: (comparative study). Journal of law, policy and globalization (United States) 75:70-78, 2018. Ariyaratna, B.A.R.R. Contracting in cyber space: a comparative analysis of electronic transaction law in Sri Lanka. Conference paper. Proceedings in law. 9th International Research Conference, Kotelawala Defence University (KDU), Sri Lanka, 2016. Bagheri Asl, S. and others. ماهیّت ح ّق انصراف در قرارداد هاي الكترونیكي Journal of studies in Islamic law & jurisprudence (Semnan, Iran) 9:17:7-32, 2017. Translation of title: The nature of withdrawal right in electronic contracts. Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) and others, eds. Digital economy: enabling environment guide: key areas of dialogue for business and policymakers. Washington, D.C., CIPE, 2018. 103 p. Chong, K.W. Implementation of United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts: Singapore’s experience. HUFS global law review (Seoul) 5:2:47-76, 2018. Cuong, P.M. Giá trị pháp lý của chữ ký điện tử ở một số quốc gia trên thế giới. Industry and trade magazine (Hanoi) 7 January 2019. Translation of title: Legal validity of digital signatures in some countries around the world. Davidson, A. The digitalisation of transferable documents and instruments in international trade. Documentary credit world (Gaithersburg, Md.) 22:8:27-33, 2018.
22/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Dmytrenko, T. Digital signatures and circulation of electronic promissory notes as means of improving the financial market transparency. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid (Kyiv) 22:97-101, 2018. Doan, T.M.A. Switching paper to electronic bills of lading: legal perspective and reform options for Vietnam. Malmö, Sweden, World Maritime University, 2018. 54 p. Thesis (MSc) – World Maritime University, Malmö, Sweden (2018). Duval, Y. and K. Mengjing. Digital trade facilitation: paperless trade in regional trade agreements. Tokyo, Asian Development Bank Institute, 2017. 28 p. Figueiredo, J.M. The influence of the Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the importance of the Electronic Communications Convention in the Macau SAR legal system. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:149- 168, 2018. Flórez Acero, G.D. Algunas nociones básicas sobre la evidencia digital en el contexto del comercio electrónico, desde la perspectiva anglosajona y su visión en Colombia. In Evidencia digital, distribución musical y derecho de consumo: discusiones desde el derecho privado. Flores Acero, G. D., D. Montenegro Reyes, D. Bernal Sánchez, Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2016, Ch. 1. Furrer, A. and L. Müller. “Functional equivalence” of digital transactions: a fundamental principle for assessing the legal validity of legal institutions and legal transactions under Swiss law. Jusletter (Bern) 18 June 2018. Ganne, E. Can blockchain revolutionize international trade? Geneva, WTO, 2018. 145 p. Hsiao, J.I.-H. “Smart” contract on the blockchain: a brave new world for UNCITRAL. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:181-190, 2018. Ibrahim, N.M. قانون األونسیترال النموذجي بشأن السجالت اإللكترونیة القابلة للتحویل لعام 2017 - دراسة تحلیلیة من منظور النظام القانوني القطري Social science research network February 19, 2018. Law and Digital Age Conference, Doha, Qatar University, 19–20 February 2018. Jumaili, A. obaid A. and S.F. Mohammadi. تكوین العقد بالوساﺋﻂ ا4لكترونیة الذﻛیة: دراسة مقارنة University of Bahrain law journal (Bahrain) 12:2:322-386, 2015.
Jung, G.Y. 유가증권의 전자화 관련 최근 국제적 논의에 관한 연구. SungKyunKwan law review (Seoul) 27:3:191-228, 2015. Translation of title: A study on recent international discussion relating to the digitization of negotiable instruments. Kin, Y.Z. Blockchain records under Singapore law. Law gazette (Singapore) Septem- ber, 2018. Kozlovskyi, Y. Електронна комерція в туризмі: практика, проблеми, перспективи. Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts (Kyiv) 1:96-106, 2018. Translation of title: E-commerce in tourism: practice, problems, perspectives. Lee, U.P. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records: another failure or a facilitator for the use of electronic bills of lading? Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 5:591-631, 2018.
Liu, M. 论电子票据适用票据法的可行性. Faxue (China) 6, 2017.
V.19-02150 23/32
A/CN.9/977
Madrid Parra, A. Contenido esencial de la Ley Modelo de la CNUDMI/UNCITRAL sobre Documentos Transmisibles Electrónicos. Revista Aranzadi de derecho y nuevas tecnologías (Spain) 48:19-60, 2018. ______. Contribución de la CNUDMI/UNCITRAL a la regulación del comercio electrónico. Revista Aranzadi de derecho y nuevas tecnologías (Spain) 46, 2018. ______. La Convención de Naciones Unidas sobre Comunicaciones Electrónicas (2005). Revista de derecho mercantil (Spain) 306:135-176, 2017. Makulilo, A. The admissibility and authentication of digital evidence in Zanzibar under the new Evidence Act. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 15:48-59, 2018. ______. The admissibility of electronic evidence in Tanzania: new rules and case law. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 13:121-132, 2016. Mooney, C.W. Fintech and secured transactions systems of the future. Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:1-20, 2018. Morea, A.O. La contratación electrónica como nueva modalidad negocial. Doctrina (Argentina) 1 May 2018. Muñoz Barda, M.G. Principales cuestiones de la contratación electrónica. Revista argentina de derecho comercial y de los negocios (Argentina) 9, abril 2014. Ndunguru, A.F. Legal challenges of the formation of electronic contracts in Tanzania: a case of Tanzania-Japan trade exchange relationship. Business education journal (Dar es Salaam) 2:1, 2018, 15 p. Nolan, D. Offer and acceptance in the electronic age. In Contract formation and parties. A. Burrows, E. Peel, eds. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 61–87. Ong, E. Blockchain bills of lading. National University of Singapore (NUS) law working paper 2018/020 NUS Centre for maritime law working paper 18/07 (Singapore) March 2018. Orji, U.J. Towards the regional harmonization of e-commerce regulation in Africa: a comparative analysis of the African Union’s e-commerce regime. Computer law review international (Cologne, Germany) 19:1:12-22, 2018. Pico Zúñiga, F.A. El proyecto de ley de títulos valores electrónicos. Ámbito jurídico 28 March 2018. Piers, M. and C. Aschauer, eds. Arbitration in the digital age: the brave new world of arbitration. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, 2018. 314 p. Polanco López, H.A. Derecho uniforme del comercio electrónico: la eficacia de las leyes modelo como elemento armonizador en la Comunidad Andina. Quito, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, 2017. 338 p. Thesis (PhD) – Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador (2017). Popovici, S. Identificarea electronică şi serviciile de încredere: de la eIDAS la alte preocupări în dreptul internaţional al comerţului electronic. Romanian review of private law (Bucureşti) 4:182-194, 2017. Translation of title: Electronic identification and trust services: from eIDAS to other concerns in the international law of electronic commerce. Qouteshat, O.H. Challenges of authentication and certification of e-awards in Dubai and before the Dubai International Financial Centre courts: the electronic
24/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
signature. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 13:97-112, 2016. Qouteshat, O.H. and K.J. Alawamleh. The enforceability of electronic arbitration agreements before the DIFC courts and Dubai courts. Digital evidence and electronic signature law review (Bedfordshire, U.K.) 14:47-60, 2017. Rajput, T. and A. Basu Bal. Recent initiatives in trade, transport and e-commerce laws to integrate the physical, financial and information flows in international supply chains. Diritto marittimo quaderni (Bologna, Italy) 1:575-621, 2015. Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. Digital technology-based solutions for enhanced effectiveness of secured transactions law: the road to perfection? Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:21-44, 2018. Saive, D. Das Blockchain-Traditionspapier: die transportrechtlichen Traditions-papiere vor dem Hintergrund neuer Technologien. Transportrecht (Köln, Germany) 41:6:234-238, 2018. Translation of title: Blockchain-based transferable document: traditional transport law papers in light of new technologies. Sheludiakov, R.S. Mіжнародно-правові основи використання електронних документів в договірних відносинах. Lex portus (Odessa, Ukraine) 3:5:49-59, 2017. Translation of title: International legal framework for the use of electronic documents in contractual relations. Takahashi, K. Blockchain technology for letters of credit and escrow arrangements. Banking law journal (New York, N.Y.) 135:2:89-103, 2018. Taoka, E. Problems of “hidden” e-commerce laws in Japan and the possibility of using the framework of the UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:101-132, 2018. Thinking outside the box. Economist (London) 18–20, 28 April 2018. Torvund, O. Commercial law in the information age. Scandinavian studies in law (Stockholm) 65:57-79, 2018. Wijesinghe, S.S. The applicability of the principles of traditional contract law in the sphere of online contracts: a Sri Lankan perspective. Junior Bar law journal (Sri Lanka) 7:233-239, 2016. Zapata Giraldo, A. and others, eds. Contratación internacional: tratados e instrumentos normativos. Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2018. 371 p.
VII. Обеспечительные интересы (включая финансирование под дебиторскую задолженность)
Adimi Gikay, A. Rethinking Ethiopian secured transactions law through comparative perspective: lessons from the Uniform Commercial Code of the US. Mizan law review (Addis Ababa) 11:1:153-195, 2017. Castellano, G.G. and M. Dubovec. Credit creation: reconciling legal and regulatory incentives. Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:63-85, 2018. ______. Global regulatory standards and secured transactions law reforms: at the crossroad between access to credit and financial stability. Fordham international law journal (New York, N.Y.) 41:3:531-588, 2018.
V.19-02150 25/32
A/CN.9/977
Cohen, N.B. The private international law of secured transactions: rules in search of harmonization. Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:203-225, 2018. Fard, E.A. and Z.A. Quchani. Comparative study on some issues of forfaiting in Iranian law: the United Nations Convention on the Assignment of Receivables and URF800. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:29- 46, 2018. Fard, E.A. and Z.A. Quchani. بررسی روابﻂ میان طرفین اصلی قرارداد فورفیتینگ با الهام از مجموعه قواعد متحدالشکل فورفیتینگ و کنوانسیون سازمان ملل متحد درباره واگذاری مطالبات Tarbiat Modares University Press: comparative law researches (Tehran) 21:1:105-129, 2017. Translation of title: Study on relationships between forfaiting parties according to URF800 and United Nations Assignment Convention (2001). Jiménez Gómez, B.S. La nueva ley de patentes y sus implicaciones en materia de garantías internacionales. Anuario español de derecho internacional privado (Madrid) 16:535-563, 2016. Keijser, T. Transnational commercial law and natural resources: overview of the ninth Transnational Commercial Law Teachers’ Meeting. Uniform law review = Revue de droit uniforme (Oxford, U.K.) 23:2:172-189, 2018. Mooney, C.W. Fintech and secured transactions systems of the future. Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:1-20, 2018. Nguyen, X.-T. Beyond TPP: legal reform for financing intellectual property and innovation in Vietnam. SMU science and technology law review (Dallas, Tex.) 20:241-247, 2017. Picado-González, J. The new security interest system in Costa Rica: some relevant data. Arizona journal of international and comparative law (Tucson, Ariz.) 33:1:139-146, 2016. Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T. Digital technology-based solutions for enhanced effectiveness of secured transactions law: the road to perfection? Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:21-44, 2018. Stoyanov, D. Supranational attempts for harmonization of the anti-assignment clause. Social science research network February 1, 2017. Current issues in law and beyond on EU level, proceedings of the second edition of the international conference, held on 6 November 2016, Szeged, 2017, p. 9–19. Tosato, A. Secured transactions and IP licenses: comparative observations and reform suggestions. Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:155-180, 2018. UN Commission on International Trade Law, ed. UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions: guide to enactment. New York, UN, 2017. 177 p. Walsh, C. The role of party autonomy in determining the third-party effects of assignments: of “secret laws” and “secret liens.” Law and contemporary problems (Durham, N.C.) 81:1:181-202, 2018.
26/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
VIII. Закупки
De Cazalet, B. and J.-Y. Gacon. Appui à la mise en place d’un cadre juridique et institutionnel unifié pour la gestion de l’investissement public: vers plus de cohérence dans la gestion des projets d’investissement public en France et à l’international, ainsi que dans les procédures de la commande publique auxquelles il est fait appel: PIM contre PPP. Revue de droit des affaires internationales = International business law journal (Paris) 4:347-361, 2018.
Jiang, A. 正确认识联合国《公共采购示范法》的修订内容. 10 January 2019. Pangia, M.D. Developing an organizational conflicts of interest framework: the U.S. system as a starting point. Public contract law journal (Chicago, Ill.) 47:4:539- 560, 2018. Quashie, M.K. An appraisal of single-source procurement in Ghana. Journal of law, policy and globalization (United States) 68:112-128, 2017. IX. Несостоятельность
Boon, G.-J. Harmonising European insolvency law: the emerging role of stakeholders. International insolvency review (Chichester, U.K.) 27:2:150-177, 2018. Bruder, F. Recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments. Eurofenix (Clifton, U.K.) 72:32-34, 2018. Business restructuring & insolvency report. 4th ed. Rochford, U.K., Time International Media & Events Services Ltd, 2018. 76 p. Clift, J. Developments in cross-border insolvency: the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and current issues. In International insolvency & restructuring report 2018/19. L. Paul, ed. Colchester, U.K., Capital Markets Intelligence, 2018, p. 4–7. ______. Modernising insolvency law: the continuing work of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). In Business restructuring & insolvency report. Rochford, U.K., Times Group, 2018, 4th ed., p. 17–19. Clift, J. and N. Cooper. UNCITRAL Model Law on the Recognition and Enforcement of Insolvency-related Judgments. INSOL world (London) fourth quarter 2018, pp. 24–25. Clopotari, A.S. Prioritatea reorganizării în detrimentul falimentului în Legea nr. 85/2014. Phoenix revista insolventa (Bucharest) 52:12-17, 2015. Translation of title: The priority of reorganization at the expense of bankruptcy in Law no. 85/2014. Davies, M. Cross-border insolvency and admiralty: a middle path of reciprocal comity. American journal of comparative law (Cary, N.C.) 66:1:101-126, 2018. Dawson, A.B. Modularity in cross-border insolvency. Chicago-Kent law review (Chicago, Ill.) 93:3:677-710, 2018. Deli-Diaconescu, A. Implicatiile suspendării legale a actiunilor în realizarea creantelor împotriva debitorului în raport de procedura dreptuliu comun. Phoenix revista insolventa (Bucharest) 58:8-15, 2016. Translation of title: New rules for insolvency firms to participate in auctions.
V.19-02150 27/32
A/CN.9/977
Draper, C.E. Brexit’s impact on cross-border insolvencies. Eurofenix (Clifton, U.K.) 73:28-29, 2018. Goicoechea, I. Nuevos desarrollos en la cooperación jurídica internacional en materia civil y comercial. Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión (Asunción) 4:7:127-151, 2016. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / World Bank, ed. Report on the treatment of MSME insolvency. Washington, D.C., World Bank Group, 2017. 45 p. Kim, Y.S. Cross-border insolvency in the Republic of Korea: focus on selected maritime issues. Korean yearbook of international law (Seoul) 4:1-19, 2016. ______. Study on the cross-border insolvency of shipping companies: focusing on maritime issues. Supreme Court law journal (Seoul) 8:1:23-86, 2018. Lannan, K. Benefits of enacting the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-border Insolvency. Revista uruguaya de derecho internacional privado (Montevideo) 9:79-85, 2017. Madaus, S. and B. Wessels. Best practice der Unternehmenssanierung in Europa: der “Business Rescue Report” des European Law Institute. KTS Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht (Köln) 79:3:247-276, 2018. Translation of title: Best practice of corporate restructuring in Europe: the “Business Rescue Report” of the European Law Institute. Metreveli, L. Toward standardized enforcement of cross-border insolvency decisions: encouraging the United States to adopt UNCITRAL’s recent amendment to its Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Columbia journal of law and social problems (New York, N.Y.) 51:2:315-346, 2017. Mevorach, I. The future of cross-border insolvency: overcoming biases and closing gaps. Oxford, U.K., Oxford University Press, 2018. 290 p. Parry, R. and N. Gao. The future direction of China’s cross-border insolvency laws, related issues and potential problems. International insolvency review (Chichester, U.K.) 27:1:5-31, 2018. Paul, L., ed. International insolvency & restructuring report 2018/19. Colchester, U.K., Capital Markets Intelligence, 2018. 75 p. Pugh, T. and D. Shah. Universally territorial: recognisable? International corporate rescue (Hertfordshire, U.K.) 15:5:285-290, 2018. Rodriguez, R. and M. Jakob. Switzerland’s new (or updated...) international insolvency law. Eurofenix (Clifton, U.K.) 74:26-27, 2018. Stanghellini, L. and others, eds. Best practices in European restructuring: contractualised distress resolution in the shadow of the law. Milano, Italy, Wolters Kluwer Italia, 2018. 280 p. Tashiro, A. and P. Esser. Multinational group insolvency in Europe and beyo nd. In Insolvency and restructuring in Germany – yearbook 2018. Achern, Germany, Schultze & Braun GmbH & Co. KG, 2017, p. 26–38. Tîrnoveanu, S. and I. Crăciun. Dreptul de optiune al practicianului în insolventă cu privire la soarta contractelor debitorului, în curs la data deschiderii procedurii: “corsetul” libertătii contractuale. Phoenix revista insolventa (Bucharest) 56:36- 66, 2016. Translation of title: The insolvency practitioner’s right of option in respect of the fate of the debtor’s contracts, pending at the date of the opening of the procedure: the bodice of the freedom of contract.
28/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Wang, B. Cross-border insolvency law in China and Hong Kong: a critical analysis based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. Leeds, U.K., University of Leeds, 2018. 275 p. Thesis (PhD) – University of Leeds, School of Law (2018).
X. Международные контракты на строительство
[По этой теме не зарегистрировано никаких публикаций.]
XI. Международная встречная торговля
[По этой теме не зарегистрировано никаких публикаций.]
XII. Проекты в области инфраструктуры, финансируемые из частных источников
Adekilekun, M.T. and others. International legislative frameworks for Public-Private Partnerships: an evaluation. Public procurement law review (London) 27:1:33- 50, 2018. De Cazalet, B. and J.-Y. Gacon. Appui à la mise en place d’un cadre juridique et institutionnel unifié pour la gestion de l’investissement public: vers plus de cohérence dans la gestion des projets d’investissement public en France et à l’international, ainsi que dans les procédures de la commande publique auxquelles il est fait appel: PIM contre PPP. Revue de droit des affaires internationales = International business law journal (Paris) 4:347-361, 2018.
XIII. Урегулирование споров в режиме онлайн
Bartolini, C. and others. Property and the cloud. Computer law & security review 28:249-275, 2018. Juanjuan, Z. On China cross-border online dispute settlement mechanism: following UNCITRAL TNODR and Alibaba experience. Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:191-228, 2018. Montoya Zorrilla, E. Towards a credible future: uses of technology in international commercial arbitration. SchiedsVZ (München) 16:2:106-114, 2018. Racine, J.-B. La résolution amiable des différends en ligne ou la figure de l’algorithme médiateur. Recueil Dalloz (Paris) 194:31:1700-1705, 2018. Sontag Koenig, S. Le numérique, relance ou révolution de l’amiable?: vers un remaniement du rôle du juge. Semaine juridique (Paris) supplément au no 51:45- 50, 2018.
Sung, J.-H. 인터넷을 통한 국제소비자거래에서의 분쟁 해소방안: ODR 을 통한 분쟁해결방안을 중심으로. Journal of arbitration studies (Seoul) 28:249-275, 2018. Translation of title: Dispute resolution in internet international consumer transaction.
V.19-02150 29/32
A/CN.9/977
UN Commission on International Trade Law, ed. Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution (2016) / United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. New York, UN, 2017. 26 p. Vilalta Nicuesa, A.E. La paradoja de la mediación en línea: recientes iniciativas de la Unión Europea y de la CNUDMI. Revista general de derecho Europeo (Spain) 33:1-35, 2014.
XIV. Микро-, малые и средние предприятия
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / World Bank, ed. Report on the treatment of MSME insolvency. Washington, D.C., World Bank Group, 2017. 45 p. UN Commission on International Trade Law, ed. UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Key Principles of a Business Registry. Vienna, United Nations, 2019. 138 p. Vermeulen, E. and others. Corporate disruption: the law and design of organizations in the 21st century. Social science research network October 2016. Wolff, R. Digital business registers from a European perspective: potential for internationally harmonized legislation? Victoria University of Wellington hors serie (Wellington) 22:133-147, 2018.
XV. Урегулирование споров между инвесторами и государствами
Anderson, A.M. UNCITRAL Working Group III: first deliberations on reforms of the investor-State dispute settlement system. Forum for International Conciliation and Arbitration (FICA) paper 2018. ______. UNCITRAL Working Group III: second session on the investor-State dispute settlement system continues discussion of concerns with the system. Forum for International Conciliation and Arbitration (FICA) paper 2018. Balthasar, S. Investment protection in Europe: international investment treaties, the European Convention on Human Rights and the need for reform at EU level. SchiedsVZ (München) 16:4:227-233, 2018. Ben-Moussa, S. A tale of two trade powers: balancing investor-State dispute settlement and environmental risk between the European Union and United States in a changing political climate. Fordham environmental law review (New York) 29:1:94-124, 2017. Brower, C.N. and J. Ahmad. From the two-headed nightingale to the fifteen-headed hydra: the many follies of the proposed international investment court. Fordham international law journal (New York, N.Y.) 41:4:791-820, 2018. Brown, C.M. A multilateral mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes: some preliminary sketches. ICSID review (Washington, D.C.) 32:3:673-690, 2017. Chochorelou, M. and C. Espaliu Berdud. Recent regional investment treaties and dispute settlement: investors and states on a roller-coaster of predominance. Revue belge de droit international (Bruxelles) 49:2:487-512, 2016.
30/32 V.19-02150
A/CN.9/977
Dimitropoulos, G. Investor-State dispute settlement reform and theory of institutional design. Journal of international dispute settlement (Oxford, U.K.) 9:4:535-569, 2018. Drličková, K. and T. Kyselovská, eds. Cofola International 2017: resolution of international disputes (conference proceedings). Brno, Czech Republic, Masaryk University, 2017. 106 p. Fekl, M. Les contestations de l’arbitrage d’investissement et les négociations commerciales internationales contemporaines. Cahiers de l’arbitrage = Paris journal of international arbitration (Paris) 3:413-435, 2018. Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. Transparency, investment protection and the role of the European Parliament. European investment law and arbitration review online (Leiden, The Netherlands) 2:371-411, 2017. Gaukrodger, D. and K. Gordon. Investor-State dispute settlement: a scoping paper for the investment policy community. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2012. 100 p. Jayashimha, S. and others. ICSID and India: should India ratify the ICSID Convention? Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:2, February 2018. Kahale, G. Rethinking ISDS. Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:5, October 2018. Kiffer, L. and A. Rafiq. Le mécanisme de résolution des litiges en matière d’investissement: une nouvelle configuration dictée par la Commission européenne. Juriste international (Paris) 3:72-74, 2017. Knieper, R. Replanteando el arbitraje de inversión. Revista Paraguaya de derecho, economía y politica (Asunción) 5, noviembre 2018. Le Cannu, P.-J. Foundation and innovation: the participation of African States in the ICSID dispute resolution system. ICSID review (Oxford, U.K.) 33:2:456-500, 2018. Malmström, C. A Multilateral Investment Court: a contribution to the conversation about reform of investment dispute settlement. Brussels, 22 November 2018. Markert, L. and S. Wilske. How the current controversy about an Investment Court System highlights Japan’s emerging role as a key player in international investment policy. JCAA newsletter (Tokyo) 39:5-11, 2018. Nedumpara, J.J. and A. Laddha. India joining the ICSID: is it a valid debate? Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:2, February 2018. Puig, S. and G. Shaffer. Imperfect alternatives: institutional choice and the reform of investment law. American journal of international law (Washington, D.C.) 112:3:361-409, 2018. Ranjan, P. ISDS transparency provisions in the Indian Model BIT: a half-hearted attempt? Transnational dispute management (Voorburg, The Netherlands) 15:2, February 2018. Roberts, A. Incremental, systemic, and paradigmatic reform of investor-state arbitration. American journal of international law (Washington, D.C.) 112:3:410-432, 2018.
V.19-02150 31/32
A/CN.9/977
Schill, S.W. Investor-State dispute settlement reform at UNCITRAL: a looming constitutional moment? Journal of world investment & trade (Leiden, The Netherlands) 19:1:1-5, 2018. Sharma, A. and J. Ahmad. Is there a need for a stand-alone body like a global investment court for adjudicating investor state disputes? Vindobona journal of international commercial law and arbitration (Vienna) 21:2:167-179, 2017. Van Harten, G. and others. Phase 2 of the UNCITRAL ISDS review: why “other matters” really matter. Osgood digital commons, all papers 328. 2018. Van Harten, G. and P. Křístková. Comments on judicial independence and impartiality in ISDS: a paper prepared for the UNCITRAL Working Group III. Osgood digital commons, all papers 327 19 December 2018.
32/32 V.19-02150