60358 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 187 / Friday, September 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests 2. On page 53074, in the second acres in order to avoid a partial overlap that you notify your principal inspector, or column, in the second full paragraph, in with the newly established Candy lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the 15th line ‘‘$1 ×’’ should read ‘‘$1x’’. Mountain viticultural area. Both the the local flight standards district office or 3. On page 53074, in the second certificate holding district office, before existing Yakima Valley viticultural area column, in the second full paragraph, in and the newly established Candy operating any aircraft complying with this × AD through an AMOC. the 17th line ‘‘$99 ’’ should read Mountain viticultural area are located ‘‘$99x’’. entirely within the existing Columbia (h) Additional Information 4. (a) On page 53075, in the third Valley viticultural area. TTB designates (1) Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin column, in the first full paragraph, in viticultural areas to allow vintners to 429–15–21, Revision B, dated May 11, 2017, the 11th line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read better describe the origin of their wines which is not incorporated by reference, ‘‘$100x’’. and to allow consumers to better contains additional information about the (b) On the same page, in the same subject of this AD. For service information identify wines they may purchase. column, in the same paragraph, in the identified in this AD, contact Bell Helicopter × DATES: This final rule is effective Textron Canada Limited, 12,800 Rue de 13th line ‘‘$100 ’’ should read October 26, 2020. l’Avenir, Mirabel, Quebec J7J1R4; telephone ‘‘$100x’’. 450–437–2862 or 800–363–8023; fax 450– (c) On the same page, in the same FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 433–0272; or at https:// column, in the same paragraph, in the Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and www.bellcustomer.com. You may view the 15th line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco referenced service information at the FAA, ‘‘$100x’’. Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest (d) On the same page, in the same NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N– column, in the same paragraph, in the phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175. 321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. × (2) The subject of this AD is addressed in 20th line ‘‘$100 ’’ should read SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ‘‘$100x’’. Transport Canada Civil Aviation (Transport Background on Viticultural Areas Canada) AD No. CF–2016–11R2, dated (e) On the same page, in the same October 18, 2017. You may view the column, in the same paragraph, in the TTB Authority Transport Canada AD on the internet at 27th line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. ‘‘$100x’’. Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol FAA–2018–0334. (f) On the same page, in the same Administration Act (FAA Act), 27 (i) Subject column, in the same paragraph, in the U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary 37th line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read of the Treasury to prescribe regulations Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, Code: 2700, Flight Control System. ‘‘$100x’’. and malt beverages. The FAA Act Issued on September 21, 2020. § 1.245A–5 [Corrected] provides that these regulations should, Lance T. Gant, 5. On page 53086, in § 1.245A–5, in among other things, prohibit consumer Director, Compliance & Airworthiness the third column, in the second full deception and the use of misleading Division, Aircraft Certification Service. paragraph, in the 19th line the heading statements on labels and ensure that [FR Doc. 2020–21127 Filed 9–24–20; 8:45 am] ‘‘(B) Special rules regarding carryover labels provide the consumer with BILLING CODE 4910–13–P foreign target stock.’’ should start a new adequate information as to the identity paragraph. and quality of the product. The Alcohol [FR Doc. C1–2020–18543 Filed 9–24–20; 8:45 am] and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (TTB) administers the FAA Act BILLING CODE 1301–00–D pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Internal Revenue Service Homeland Security Act of 2002, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The 26 CFR Part 1 Secretary has delegated the functions [TD 9909] Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade and duties in the administration and Bureau enforcement of these provisions to the RIN 1545–BP35 TTB Administrator through Treasury Limitation on Deduction for Dividends 27 CFR Part 9 Order 120–01, dated December 10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120–01, Received From Certain Foreign [Docket No. TTB–2019–0006; T.D. TTB–163; Corporations and Amounts Eligible for Ref: Notice No. 184] dated January 24, 2003). Section 954 Look-Through Exception Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR RIN 1513–AC42 part 4) authorizes TTB to establish Correction definitive viticultural areas and regulate Establishment of the Candy Mountain the use of their names as appellations of In rule document 2020–18543 Viticultural Area and Modification of origin on wine labels and in wine beginning on page 53068 in the issue of the Yakima Valley Viticultural Area Thursday, August 27, 2020, make the advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB following corrections: AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth 1. (a) On page 53074, in the second Trade Bureau, Treasury. standards for the preparation and column, in the second full paragraph, in ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision. submission to TTB of petitions for the the ninth line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read establishment or modification of ‘‘$100x’’. SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax American viticultural areas (AVAs) and (b) On the same page, in the same and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the lists the approved AVAs. approximately 815-acre ‘‘Candy column, in the same paragraph, in the Definition 13th line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read Mountain’’ viticultural area in Benton ‘‘$100x’’. County, Washington. TTB is also Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB (c) On the same page, in the same expanding the boundary of the existing regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines column, in the same paragraph, in the 1,093-square mile Yakima Valley a viticultural area for American wine as 21st line ‘‘$100 ×’’ should read ‘‘$100x’’. viticultural area by approximately 72 a delimited grape-growing region having

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:33 Sep 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 187 / Friday, September 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 60359

distinguishing features, as described in The proposed Candy Mountain AVA soils also do not have a large water part 9 of the regulations, and a name lies entirely within the established holding capacity, meaning that vineyard and a delineated boundary, as Columbia Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.74) owners must monitor soil moisture established in part 9 of the regulations. and partially within the established carefully to ensure the vines have These designations allow vintners and Yakima Valley AVA (27 CFR 9.69). To adequate access to water. Finally, the consumers to attribute a given quality, avoid the partial overlap, the petition thin soils allow roots to come into reputation, or other characteristic of a also proposed expanding the Yakima contact with the underlying basalt wine made from grapes grown in an area Valley AVA by approximately 72 acres bedrock, which is comprised of to the wine’s geographic origin. The so that the entire proposed Candy calcium-rich feldspars and other establishment of AVAs allows vintners Mountain AVA would be within the minerals that are rich in iron and to describe more accurately the origin of established AVA. Dr. Pogue submitted magnesium, such as pyroxene and their wines to consumers and helps the petition on behalf of the following olivine. The petition states that these consumers to identify wines they may industry members with wine businesses minerals and nutrients are only present purchase. Establishment of an AVA is within the proposed AVA: Ramer in the bedrock, so vines planted in the neither an approval nor an endorsement Holtan, who is developing a commercial surrounding regions where the soil is by TTB of the wine produced in that wine grape vineyard on Candy thicker do not have the same access to area. Mountain; Premiere Columbia Partners these elements as vines planted within LLC, owners of Candy Mountain the proposed AVA. Requirements Vineyard; and Paul and Vickie Kitzke, Topography also distinguishes the Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB owners of Kitzke Cellars. proposed Candy Mountain AVA from regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines Within the 815-acre proposed AVA, the surrounding regions. The proposed the procedure for proposing an AVA there are currently two producing Candy Mountain AVA is located on the and provides that any interested party commercial vineyards, Candy Mountain southwest-facing slope of Candy may petition TTB to establish a grape- Vineyard and Kitzke Cellars, which Mountain. Within the proposed AVA, growing region as an AVA. Section 9.12 cover a total of approximately 54 acres. elevations range from 640 feet to 1,320 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) Additionally, Mr. Holtan has secured feet, and slope angles are gentle to prescribes standards for petitions for the long-term leases from the Washington moderate and range from 2 to 20 establishment or modification of AVAs. Department of Natural Resources to degrees. Gentle slope angles facilitate Petitions to establish an AVA must plant 200 additional acres of vineyards mechanized vineyard maintenance and include the following: within the proposed AVA. A copy of the harvest. A south-facing slope aspect • Evidence that the area within the lease was included in the petition as increases the amount per unit area of proposed AVA boundary is nationally evidence of Mr. Holtan’s intent to grow solar radiation that reaches the surface or locally known by the AVA name wine grapes. Currently, Kitzke Cellars is and promotes photosynthesis in the specified in the petition; the only winery within the proposed grape vines, as well as grape • An explanation of the basis for AVA, although the petition notes that development and maturation. defining the boundary of the proposed other wineries in Washington produce By contrast, the valley floor AVA; wines from grapes grown within the surrounding both the entire Candy • A narrative description of the proposed AVA. According to the Mountain and the proposed Candy features of the proposed AVA affecting petition, the distinguishing features of Mountain AVA is essentially flat, with viticulture, such as climate, geology, the proposed Candy Mountain AVA are slope angles of less than 2 degrees, and soils, physical features, and elevation, its soils and topography. is susceptible to cold air pooling and the that make the proposed AVA distinctive The soils of the proposed Candy associated frosts and freezes. and distinguish it from adjacent areas Mountain AVA are developed from Additionally, much of the land outside the proposed AVA boundary; wind-deposited silt (loess) and fine sand immediately surrounding the proposed • The appropriate United States overlying sediment. The sediment is a AVA is a valley floor with elevations Geological Survey (USGS) map(s) mixture of gravel and sand that was below 640 feet. The exception is the showing the location of the proposed derived directly from surging ice-age northeastern side of Candy Mountain, AVA, with the boundary of the flood waters and also includes silt and which has similar elevations to the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; fine sand that settled out of suspension proposed Candy Mountain AVA but was • If the proposed AVA is to be when the flood waters pooled behind excluded from the proposed AVA due to established within, or overlapping, an downstream topographic restrictions. northeasterly slope aspect and steep existing AVA, an explanation that both The loess and sediment, in turn, both slope angles of up to 60 degrees. overlay basalt bedrock. The thickness of identifies the attributes of the proposed Proposed Modification of the Yakima the flood-water sediment within the AVA that are consistent with the Valley AVA existing AVA and explains how the proposed Candy Mountain AVA proposed AVA is sufficiently distinct gradually decreases as one moves up the As previously noted, the petition to from the existing AVA and therefore mountain, and the sediment is not establish the proposed Candy Mountain appropriate for separate recognition; found within the upper 70 feet of the AVA also requested an expansion of the and proposed AVA. By contrast, the regions established 1,093-square mile Yakima • A detailed narrative description of to the north, south, and west of the Valley AVA. The proposed Candy the proposed AVA boundary based on mountain and the proposed Candy Mountain AVA is located in the USGS map markings. Mountain AVA are at lower elevations northeastern portion of the Yakima and, therefore, have thicker Valley AVA. Most of the proposed Candy Mountain Petition accumulations of flood sediments in Candy Mountain AVA would, if TTB received a petition from Dr. their soils. established, be located within the Kevin R. Pogue, a professor of geology According to the petition, the soils of current boundary of the Yakima Valley at Whitman College, proposing the the proposed AVA have an effect on AVA. However, unless the boundary of establishment of the ‘‘Candy Mountain’’ viticulture. The soils are fairly loose, the Yakima Valley AVA is modified, a AVA in Benton County, Washington. which allows for root expansion. The small portion of the proposed Candy

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 60360 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 187 / Friday, September 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations

Mountain AVA would be outside the boundary, and other required characteristics with both established Yakima Valley AVA. The proposed information submitted in support of the AVAs. For example, the proposed AVA modification of the Yakima Valley AVA petition. In addition, given the proposed is located within the Yakima River boundary would increase the size of the Candy Mountain AVA’s location within drainage basin, which is a characteristic established AVA by 72 acres and would the Yakima Valley and Columbia Valley of the Yakima Valley AVA. The result in the entire proposed Candy AVAs, TTB solicited comments on Warden-Shano Association and the Mountain AVA being within the Yakima whether the evidence submitted in the Scootenay-Starbuck Association soils Valley AVA. petition regarding the distinguishing are found within both the proposed The petition states that the vineyards features of the proposed AVA AVA and the Yakima Valley AVA. within the proposed expansion area are sufficiently differentiates it from the two Elevations within the proposed AVA are within the proposed Candy Mountain established AVAs. TTB also requested under 2,000 feet, which is a general AVA but lie approximately 600 feet comments on whether the geographic characteristic of the Columbia Valley outside of the current boundary of the features of the proposed AVA are so AVA. However, the Candy Mountain Yakima Valley AVA. The vineyards did distinguishable from the two established AVA is located on an isolated mountain, not exist at the time the Yakima Valley AVAs that the proposed AVA should no whereas the majority of the Yakima AVA was established. However, the longer be part of the established AVAs. Valley and Columbia Valley AVAs are petition states that the proposed The comment period closed October 18, described as broad, flat valleys. expansion area is associated with both 2019. Additionally, the proposed AVA has the feature known as the Yakima Valley In response to Notice No. 184, TTB steeper slope angles than much of the and the Yakima Valley AVA. For received a total of two comments. One land within the Columbia Valley and example, the proposed expansion area is of the comments was from a winery Yakima Valley AVAs. part of the larger Yakima River drainage owner who sources grapes from both the basin, which is a characteristic of the proposed Candy Mountain AVA and the Boundary Description Yakima Valley AVA. Additionally, the adjacent Red Mountain AVA (27 CFR See the narrative description of the petition states that the owners of Kitzke 9.167). The commenter supports the boundary of the Candy Mountain AVA Cellars, who manage the seven acres of proposed Candy Mountain AVA and the Yakima Valley AVA boundary vineyards within the proposed because ‘‘there do appear to be modification in the regulatory text expansion area, have aligned themselves differences due to a sense of place published at the end of this final rule. with the Yakima Valley AVA through between those two adjacent (proposed) their membership in Wine Yakima AVAs.’’ The second comment was from Maps Valley, which is the Yakima Valley the petitioner, Dr. Kevin Pogue. In his The petitioners provided the required AVA’s marketing organization. comment, Dr. Pogue pointed out that the maps, and they are listed below in the The petition asserts that the proposed proposed rule incorrectly identified the regulatory text. The Candy Mountain expansion area has similar soils, size of the Yakima Valley AVA as 1,093 AVA boundary and the modified elevation, slope angles, and slope aspect acres instead of 1,093 square miles. TTB as the remainder of the proposed Candy notes that it has corrected the Yakima Valley AVA boundary may also Mountain AVA, which is within the description of the size of the Yakima be viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on Yakima Valley AVA. The petition also Valley AVA in this final rule document. the TTB website, at https://www.ttb.gov/ describes the general similarities that Neither of the comments mentioned the wine/ava-map-explorer. the entire proposed Candy Mountain proposed expansion of the established Impact on Current Wine Labels AVA shares with the established Yakima Valley AVA or the inclusion of Yakima Valley AVA, such as similar soil the proposed Candy Mountain AVA Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits series and geology. within the established Yakima Valley or any label reference on a wine that Columbia Valley AVAs. indicates or implies an origin other than Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and the wine’s true place of origin. For a Comments Received TTB Determination wine to be labeled with an AVA name TTB published Notice No. 184 in the After careful review of the petition or with a brand name that includes an Federal Register on August 19, 2019 (84 and the comments received in response AVA name, at least 85 percent of the FR 42863), proposing to establish the to Notice No. 184, TTB finds that the wine must be derived from grapes Candy Mountain AVA and expand the evidence provided by the petitioner grown within the area represented by Yakima Valley AVA. In the notice, TTB supports the establishment of the Candy that name, and the wine must meet the summarized the evidence from the Mountain AVA and the modification of other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of petition regarding the name, boundary, the Yakima Valley AVA boundary. the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). and distinguishing features for the Accordingly, under the authority of the If the wine is not eligible for labeling proposed AVA and the proposed AVA FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the with an AVA name and that name expansion area. The notice also Homeland Security Act of 2002, and appears in the brand name, then the compared the distinguishing features of parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, label is not in compliance and the the proposed AVA and the proposed TTB establishes the ‘‘Candy Mountain’’ bottler must change the brand name and expansion area to the surrounding areas. AVA in Benton County, Washington, obtain approval of a new label. For a detailed description of the and modifies the boundary of the Similarly, if the AVA name appears in evidence relating to the name, Yakima Valley AVA effective 30 days another reference on the label in a boundary, and distinguishing features of from the publication date of this misleading manner, the bottler would the proposed AVA and boundary document. have to obtain approval of a new label. modification, and for a detailed TTB has also determined that the Different rules apply if a wine has a comparison of the distinguishing Candy Mountain AVA will remain part brand name containing an AVA name features of the proposed AVA to the of both the established Columbia Valley that was used as a brand name on a surrounding areas, see Notice No. 184. AVA and the Yakima Valley AVA. As label approved before July 7, 1986. See In Notice No. 184, TTB solicited discussed in Notice No. 184, the Candy § 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 comments on the accuracy of the name, Mountain AVA shares some broad CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 187 / Friday, September 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 60361

With the establishment of the Candy List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 (10) Proceed southeast in a straight Mountain AVA, its name, ‘‘Candy Wine. line, crossing onto the Walla Walla map, Mountain,’’ will be recognized as a to the top of Badger Mountain; name of viticultural significance under The Regulatory Amendment * * * * * § 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 For the reasons discussed in the ■ 3. Add § 9.272 to read as follows: CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter regulations clarifies this point. I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as § 9.272 Candy Mountain. Consequently, wine bottlers using the follows: name ‘‘Candy Mountain’’ in a brand (a) Name. The name of the viticultural name, including a trademark, or in PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL area described in this section is ‘‘Candy another label reference as to the origin AREAS Mountain’’. For purposes of part 4 of of the wine, will have to ensure that the this chapter, ‘‘Candy Mountain’’ is a product is eligible to use the AVA name ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 term of viticultural significance. as an appellation of origin. continues to read as follows: (b) Approved maps. The three United The establishment of the Candy Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. States Geological Survey (USGS) Mountain AVA will not affect the 1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to existing Columbia Valley or Yakima Subpart C—Approved American determine the boundary of the Candy Valley AVAs, and any bottlers using Viticultural Areas Mountain viticultural area are titled: ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ or ‘‘Yakima Valley’’ ■ 2. Amend § 9.69 by revising (1) Badger Mountain, Washington, as an appellation of origin or in a brand paragraphs (b) and (c)(4), redesignating 2013; name for wines made from grapes grown paragraphs (c)(5) through (c)(10) as within the Columbia Valley or Yakima (2) Benton City, Washington, 2013; paragraphs (c)(11) through (16), and Valley AVAs will not be affected by the and adding new paragraphs (c)(5) through establishment of this new AVA. The (3) Richland, Washington, 2014. (c)(10) to read as follows: establishment of the Candy Mountain (c) Boundary. The Candy Mountain AVA will allow vintners to use ‘‘Candy § 9.69 Yakima Valley. viticultural area is located in Benton Mountain,’’ ‘‘Yakima Valley,’’ and * * * * * County in Washington. The boundary of ‘‘Columbia Valley’’ as appellations of (b) Approved maps. The United States the Candy Mountain viticultural area is origin for wines made primarily from Geological Survey (USGS) maps used to as described below: grapes grown within the Candy determine the boundary of the Yakima (1) The beginning point is on the Mountain AVA if the wines meet the Valley viticultural area are titled: Badger Mountain map at the eligibility requirements for these (1) Walla Walla, Washington southernmost point of an unnamed road appellations. (1:250,000 scale), 1953; limited revision known locally as Arena Road. From the The modification of the Yakima 1963; beginning point, proceed northwest in a Valley AVA boundary will allow (2) Yakima, Washington (1:250,000 straight line for approximately 1.85 vintners to use ‘‘Yakima Valley,’’ scale), 1958; revised 1971; miles, crossing onto the Benton City ‘‘Columbia Valley,’’ and ‘‘Candy (3) Benton City, WA (1:24,000 scale), map, to the intersection with East Mountain’’ as appellations of origin for 2013; Kennedy Road NE; then wines made primarily from grapes (4) Badger Mountain, Washington grown within the expansion area if the (1:24,000 scale), 2013; and (2) Proceed westerly along East wines meet the eligibility requirements (5) Richland, Washington (1:24,000 Kennedy Road NE for approximately for these appellations. scale), 2014. 2,500 feet to the intersection with an intermittent creek approximately 0.8 Regulatory Flexibility Act * * * * * mile south of Lost Lake; then (c) * * * TTB certifies that this regulation will (4) Then southeast, crossing onto the (3) Proceed southeasterly along the not have a significant economic impact Benton City map, to the top of Red easternmost fork of the intermittent on a substantial number of small Mountain; creek to the intersection with Interstate entities. The regulation imposes no new (5) Then southeast to a point on East 82; then reporting, recordkeeping, or other Kennedy Road approximately 2,500 feet (4) Proceed southeast along Interstate administrative requirement. Any benefit east of an intermittent stream flowing 82 for 2.25 miles, crossing over the derived from the use of an AVA name north into Lost Lake; Richland map and onto the Badger would be the result of a proprietor’s (6) Then southeast across the top of Mountain map, and continuing along efforts and consumer acceptance of Candy Mountain, crossing onto the the ramp onto Interstate 182 to a point wines from that area. Therefore, no Badger Mountain map, and continuing due south of the intersection of Dallas regulatory flexibility analysis is to the intersection with the Road and an unnamed road known required. southernmost point of an unnamed road locally as East 260 Private Road NE; Executive Order 12866 known locally as Arena Road; then then (7) Proceed north for 0.45 mile along (5) Proceed north in a straight line for It has been determined that this final Arena Road, crossing onto the Richland 0.5 mile, crossing onto the Richland rule is not a significant regulatory action map, to the intersection with the 670- map, to the intersection of Dallas Road as defined by Executive Order 12866 of foot elevation contour; then and the 670-foot elevation contour; then September 30, 1993. Therefore, no (8) Proceed generally east for 0.4 mile regulatory assessment is required. along the elevation contour to the (6) Proceed west along the 670-foot intersection with Dallas Road; then elevation contour for 0.4 mile to the Drafting Information (9) Proceed south in a straight line for intersection with Arena Road; then Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations 0.5 mile, crossing onto the Badger (7) Proceed southerly along Arena and Rulings Division drafted this final Mountain map, to the intersection with Road for approximately 0.45 miles, rule. Interstate 182; then returning to the beginning point.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES 60362 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 187 / Friday, September 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations

Signed: April 14, 2020. 2020, unless otherwise indicated, and Mariners, press releases, and other Mary G. Ryan, were terminated before they could be means. Moreover, actual notification is Acting Administrator. published in the Federal Register. provided by Coast Guard patrol vessels Approved: August 12, 2020. ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in enforcing the restrictions imposed by Timothy E. Skud, this document may be viewed online, the rule. Because Federal Register Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tax, Trade, and under their respective docket numbers, publication was not possible before the Tariff Policy. using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at end of the effective period, mariners [FR Doc. 2020–18741 Filed 9–24–20; 8:45 am] http://www.regulations.gov. were personally notified of the contents BILLING CODE 4810–31–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For of these safety zones, security zones, questions on this document contact special local regulations, regulated Yeoman First Class Glenn Grayer, Office navigation areas or drawbridge DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND of Regulations and Administrative Law, operation regulations by Coast Guard SECURITY telephone (202) 372–3862. officials on-scene prior to any SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast enforcement action. However, the Coast Coast Guard Guard District Commanders and Guard, by law, must publish in the Captains of the Port (COTP) must be Federal Register notice of substantive 33 CFR Parts 100 and 165 immediately responsive to the safety rules adopted. To meet this obligation and security needs within their [Docket Number USCG–2020–0318] without imposing undue expense on the jurisdiction; therefore, District public, the Coast Guard periodically 2020 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Commanders and COTPs have been publishes a list of these temporary Security Zones, and Special Local delegated the authority to issue certain safety zones, security zones, special Regulations local regulations. Safety zones may be local regulations, regulated navigation established for safety or environmental areas and drawbridge operation AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. purposes. A safety zone may be regulations. Permanent rules are not ACTION: Notification of expired stationary and described by fixed limits included in this list because they are temporary rules issued. or it may be described as a zone around published in their entirety in the a vessel in motion. Security zones limit Federal Register. Temporary rules are SUMMARY: This document provides access to prevent injury or damage to notification of substantive rules issued also published in their entirety if vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. sufficient time is available to do so by the Coast Guard that were made Special local regulations are issued to temporarily effective but expired before before they are placed in effect or enhance the safety of participants and terminated. they could be published in the Federal spectators at regattas and other marine Register. This document lists temporary events. The following unpublished rules were safety zones, security zones, and special Timely publication of these rules in placed in effect temporarily during the local regulations, all of limited duration the Federal Register may be precluded period between July 2019 and March and for which timely publication in the when a rule responds to an emergency, 2020 unless otherwise indicated. To Federal Register was not possible. or when an event occurs without view copies of these rules, visit DATES: This document lists temporary sufficient advance notice. The affected www.regulations.gov and search by the Coast Guard rules that became effective, public is, however, often informed of docket number indicated in the primarily between July 2019 and March these rules through Local Notices to following table.

Docket No. Type Location Effective date

USCG–2019–0623 ...... Safety Zone ...... Port Buffalo Zone ...... 7/7/2019 USCG–2019–0547 ...... Safety Zone ...... Cleveland, OH ...... 7/12/2019 USCG–2019–0539 ...... Safety Zone ...... Port Buffalo Zone ...... 7/12/2019 USCG–2019–0611 ...... Safety Zone ...... Clayton, NY ...... 7/20/2019 USCG–2019–0396 ...... Safety Zone ...... Cleveland, OH ...... 7/21/2019 USCG–2019–0583 ...... Safety Zone ...... Pacific Grove, CA ...... 7/27/2019 USCG–2019–0473 ...... Safety Zone ...... Kendall, NY ...... 8/3/2019 USCG–2019–0601 ...... Safety Zone ...... North Tonawanda, NY ...... 8/3/2019 USCG–2019–0680 ...... Safety Zone ...... Erie, PA ...... 8/27/2019 USCG–2019–0713 ...... Safety Zone ...... Port Buffalo Zone ...... 9/1/2019 USCG–2019–0723 ...... Safety Zone ...... Sodus Point, NY ...... 9/2/2019 USCG–2019–0731 ...... Safety Zone ...... Westfield, NY ...... 9/3/2019 USCG–2019–0708 ...... Safety Zone ...... Conneaut, OH ...... 9/7/2019 USCG–2019–0668 ...... Safety Zone ...... Conneaut, OH ...... 9/7/2019 USCG–2019–0711 ...... Safety Zone ...... Lake Erie, Vermilion, OH ...... 9/14/2019 USCG–2019–0766 ...... Safety Zone ...... Bratenahl, OH ...... 9/17/2019 USCG–2019–0779 ...... Safety Zone ...... Verona, NY ...... 9/17/2019 USCG–2019–0791 ...... Safety Zone ...... Presque Isle Bay, Erie, PA ...... 10/1/2019 USCG–2019–0805 ...... Safety Zone ...... Cuyahoga River ...... 10/5/2019 USCG–2019–0969 ...... Safety Zone ...... Alameda, CA ...... 1/5/2020 USCG–2020–0002 ...... Safety Zone ...... Ft Lauderdale, FL ...... 1/6/2020 USCG–2020–0016 ...... Security Zones (Part 165) ...... Toledo, OH ...... 1/9/2020 USCG–2020–0018 ...... Safety Zone ...... Menominee, MI ...... 1/18/2020 USCG–2020–0026 ...... Security Zones (Part 165) ...... New Orleans, LA ...... 1/18/2020 USCG–2020–0059 ...... Safety Zone ...... Port New York Zone ...... 1/23/2020 USCG–2020–0020 ...... Special Local Regulations ...... Tampa, FL ...... 1/25/2020 USCG–2020–0083 ...... Security Zones (Part 165) ...... Wildwood, NJ ...... 1/28/2020 USCG–2020–0070 ...... Safety Zone ...... Chicago, IL ...... 1/28/2020

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:28 Sep 24, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM 25SER1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES