Drought Tolerant Plants

Copy Link

DroughtTolerant Plants

Trees

The following trees offer tolerance to compacted, infertile soils, and other environmental stresses such as heat and drought once established.

Acer saccarum Cercis canadensis Crataegus

Sugar Maple Redbud

Liquidambar styraciﬂua

Platanus

Sweetgum Sycamore

Pear
Hawthorn

Green Ash Ginkgo

Pyrus calleryana Quercus palustris Tilia
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Ginkgo biloba

Pin Oak Linden

Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis Thornless
Zelkova

Japanese Zelkova
Honeylocust

Shrubs,Vines & Evergreens

The following plants tolerate dry soil once established.

Abies concolor Aronia

Concolor Fir Chokeberry Japanese Aucuba Barberry

Forsythia

Forsythia

Ilex x meservae Ilex opaca Juniperus

Blue Holly

Aucuba japonica Berberis

American Holly Juniper

Buddleia davidii Callicarpa

Butterﬂy Bush

Beautyberry TrumpetVine Hornbeam

Lagerstroemia Liriope

Crape Myrtle Liriope

Campsis radicans Carpinus
Lonicera

Honeysuckle Bayberry

Myrica
Cedrus deodara Corylus

Deodara Cedar Walking Stick Smokebush

Parthenocissus Picea spp. Pinus cembra Pyracantha Rosa rugosa Spirea spp. Syringa

Virginia Creeper Spruce species Swiss Stone Pine Firethorn

Cotinus coggygria Cotoneaster

Cotoneaster Japanese Cedar Leyland Cypress Blue Ice Cypress Scotch Broom Deutzia

Cryptomeria japonica Cupressocyparis leylandii Cupressus arizonica Cytissus

Rugosa Rose Spirea species Lilac

Viburnum spp. Vitex

Viburnum species ChasteTree WisteriaVine Yucca

Deutzia Euonymus alatus Euonymus fortunei

Burning Bush Wintercreeper

Wisteria Yucca

www.skh.com

Perennials & Grasses

The following perennials tolerate dry soil once established.

Achillea

Yarrow

Hemerocallis Hosta

Daylily

Aegopodium Agastache Arabis

Bishopsweed Licorice Mint Rock Cress Wormwood

ButterﬂyWeed

Aster
Plantain Lily CandyTuft

Iberis Iris germanica

Kniphoﬁa

Lamiastrum Lamium

German Iris Red Hot Poker Archangel

Artemisia Asclepias Aster

Dead Nettle Lavender

Baptisia

False Indigo Heart-leaf Bergenia Feather Reed Grass Corn Flower Plumbago

Lavendula

Liatris
Bergenia

Gayfeather Sea Lavender Campion

Calamagrostis Centaurea Ceratostigma Chrysanthemum Coreopsis Delosperma Dianthus
Limonium Lychnis Miscanthus varieties Nepeta

Silver Grass

Catmint
Mum

Tickseed

Oenothera Panicum varieties Pennisetum Penstemon Perovskia Rudbeckia Salvia

Evening Primrose Switch Grass Fountain Grass BeardedTongue Russian Sage Black Eyed Susan Sage
Ice Plant Carnation

Echinacea Echinops

Cone Flower GlobeThistle Barrenwort Sea Holly

Epimedium Eryngium Euphorbia Festuca

Cushion Spurge Fescue Grass Blanket Flower Gaura

Santolina Sedum

Lavender Cotton Stone Crop Hens and Chicks Goldenrod Lamb’s Ear

Gaillardia Gaura
Sempervirens Solidago
Geranium Helianthemum Heliopsis

Cranesbill

Stachys

Sun Rose

Stokesia

Stokes Aster Verbena

False Sunﬂower

Verbena

Annuals

Flowers that tolerate dry conditions.

Amaranthus tricolor

Joseph’s Coat

Lobularia maritime Melampodium

Sweet Alyssum Melampodium Geranium

Bidens

Bidens

Capsicum annuum Catharanthus roseus Celosia

Ornamental Pepper Vinca

Pelargonium Petunia

Petunia
Cockscomb Spider Flower Gazania

Portulaca grandiﬂora

Sanvitalia procumbens Senecio cineraria T a getes

Moss Rose Creeping Zinnia Dusty Miller Marigold

Cleome Gazania rigens Gomphrena globosa Helichrysum

Globe Amaranth

Strawﬂower

Statice

Thymophylla tenuiloba Verbena x hybrida

Dahlberg Daisy Verbena

Limonium sinuatum

www.skh.com

Recommended publications

1151CIRC.Pdf

CIRCULAR 153 MAY 1967 OBSERVATIONS on SPECIES of CYPRESS INDIGENOUS to the UNITED STATES Agricultural Experiment Station AUBURN UNIVERSIT Y E. V. Smith, Director Auburn, Alabama CONTENTS Page SPECIES AND VARIETIES OF CUPRESSUS STUDIED 4 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION-- 4 CONE COLLECTION 5 Cupressus arizonica var. arizonica (Arizona Cypress) 7 Cupressus arizonica var. glabra (Smooth Arizona Cypress) 11 Cupressus guadalupensis (Tecate Cypress) 11 Cupressus arizonicavar. stephensonii (Cuyamaca Cypress) 11 Cupressus sargentii (Sargent Cypress) 12 Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana (Gowen Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana (Santa Cruz Cypress) 12 Cupressus goveniana var. pygmaca (Mendocino Cypress) 12 Cupressus bakeri (Siskiyou Cypress) 13 Cupressus bakeri (Modoc Cypress) 13 Cupressus macnabiana (McNab Cypress) 13 Cupressus arizonica var. nevadensis (Piute Cypress) 13 GENERAL COMMENTS ON GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION ---------- 13 COMMENTS ON STUDYING CYPRESSES 19 FIRST PRINTING 3M, MAY 1967 OBSERVATIONS on SPECIES of CYPRESS INDIGENOUS to the UNITED STATES CLAYTON E. POSEY* and JAMES F. GOGGANS Department of Forestry THERE HAS BEEN considerable interest in growing Cupressus (cypress) in the Southeast for several years. The Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, was the first institution in the Southeast to initiate work on the cy- presses in 1937, and since that time many states have introduced Cupressus in hope of finding a species suitable for Christmas tree production. In most cases seed for trial plantings were obtained from commercial dealers without reference to seed source or form of parent tree. Many plantings yielded a high proportion of columnar-shaped trees not suitable for the Christmas tree market. It is probable that seed used in Alabama and other Southeastern States came from only a few trees of a given geo- graphic source.
The Successional Status of Cupressus Arizonica

Great Basin Naturalist Volume 40 Number 3 Article 6 9-30-1980 The successional status of Cupressus arizonica Albert J. Parker University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Parker, Albert J. (1980) "The successional status of Cupressus arizonica," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 40 : No. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol40/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE SUCCESSIONAL STATUS OF CUPRESSUS ARIZOMCA Albert J. Parker .\bstbact.— Several investigations isize-class analysis, age-determination inquiries, and germination tests"* suggest that Cupressus arizonica of southeastern .\rizona is a pioneer species. The tree requires disturbance to remove or species. of light reduce soil litter, which other\%-ise inhibits the reproduction of the Reduction intensity caused by canopy closure appears to be less important than litter accumulation in restricting C. arizonica reproduction. Fol- lowing disturbance, successful establishment of seedlings may occur over an e.xtended period ,50 to 100 years I as Utter graduallv accumulates. The absence of C. arizonica seedlings in present populations suggest that fire suppres- sion policies on federal lands where C. arizonica occurs have altered fire frequency, and consequently have fostered a short-term reduction in C. arizonica establishment. Only in floodplain en\ironments. where flooding disturbs the soil surface, has much reproduction occurred in recent years.
Annotated Check List and Host Index Arizona Wood

Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood-Rotting Fungi Item Type text; Book Authors Gilbertson, R. L.; Martin, K. J.; Lindsey, J. P. Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 28/09/2021 02:18:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/602154 Annotated Check List and Host Index for Arizona Wood - Rotting Fungi Technical Bulletin 209 Agricultural Experiment Station The University of Arizona Tucson AÏfJ\fOTA TED CHECK LI5T aid HOST INDEX ford ARIZONA WOOD- ROTTlNg FUNGI /. L. GILßERTSON K.T IyIARTiN Z J. P, LINDSEY3 PRDFE550I of PLANT PATHOLOgY 2GRADUATE ASSISTANT in I?ESEARCI-4 36FZADAATE A5 S /STANT'" TEACHING Z z l'9 FR5 1974- INTRODUCTION flora similar to that of the Gulf Coast and the southeastern United States is found. Here the major tree species include hardwoods such as Arizona is characterized by a wide variety of Arizona sycamore, Arizona black walnut, oaks, ecological zones from Sonoran Desert to alpine velvet ash, Fremont cottonwood, willows, and tundra. This environmental diversity has resulted mesquite. Some conifers, including Chihuahua pine, in a rich flora of woody plants in the state. De- Apache pine, pinyons, junipers, and Arizona cypress tailed accounts of the vegetation of Arizona have also occur in association with these hardwoods. appeared in a number of publications, including Arizona fungi typical of the southeastern flora those of Benson and Darrow (1954), Nichol (1952), include Fomitopsis ulmaria, Donkia pulcherrima, Kearney and Peebles (1969), Shreve and Wiggins Tyromyces palustris, Lopharia crassa, Inonotus (1964), Lowe (1972), and Hastings et al.
Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau

ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION AZ1557 January 2012 Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau Introduction Leyland cypress (x Cupressocyparis leylandii) is a fast- growing evergreen that has been widely planted as a landscape specimen and along boundaries to create windbreaks or privacy screening in Arizona. The presence of Seiridium canker was confirmed in Prescott, Arizona in July 2011 and it is suspected that the disease occurs in other areas of the state. Seiridium canker was first identified in California’s San Joaquin Valley in 1928. Today, it can be found in Europe, Asia, New Zealand, Australia, South America and Africa on plants in the cypress family (Cupressaceae). Leyland cypress, Monterey cypress, (Cupressus macrocarpa) and Italian cypress (C. sempervirens) are highly susceptible and can be severely impacted by this disease. Since Leyland and Italian cypress have been widely planted in Arizona, it is imperative that Seiridium canker management strategies be applied and suitable resistant tree species be recommended for planting in the future. The Pathogen Seiridium canker is known to be caused by three different fungal species: Seiridium cardinale, S. cupressi and S. unicorne. S. cardinale is the most damaging of the three species and is SCHALAU found in California. S. unicorne and S. cupressi are found in the southeastern United States where the primary host is JEFF Leyland cypress. All three species produce asexual fruiting Figure 1. Leyland cypress tree with dead branch (upper left) and main leader bodies (acervuli) in cankers. The acervuli produce spores caused by Seiridium canker. (conidia) which spread by water, human activity (pruning and transport of infected plant material), and potentially insects, birds and animals to neighboring trees where new Symptoms and Signs infections can occur.
Morphology and Morphogenesis of the Seed Cones of the Cupressaceae - Part II Cupressoideae

1 2 Bull. CCP 4 (2): 51-78. (10.2015) A. Jagel & V.M. Dörken Morphology and morphogenesis of the seed cones of the Cupressaceae - part II Cupressoideae Summary The cone morphology of the Cupressoideae genera Calocedrus, Thuja, Thujopsis, Chamaecyparis, Fokienia, Platycladus, Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Cupressus and Juniperus are presented in young stages, at pollination time as well as at maturity. Typical cone diagrams were drawn for each genus. In contrast to the taxodiaceous Cupressaceae, in Cupressoideae outgrowths of the seed-scale do not exist; the seed scale is completely reduced to the ovules, inserted in the axil of the cone scale. The cone scale represents the bract scale and is not a bract- /seed scale complex as is often postulated. Especially within the strongly derived groups of the Cupressoideae an increased number of ovules and the appearance of more than one row of ovules occurs. The ovules in a row develop centripetally. Each row represents one of ascending accessory shoots. Within a cone the ovules develop from proximal to distal. Within the Cupressoideae a distinct tendency can be observed shifting the fertile zone in distal parts of the cone by reducing sterile elements. In some of the most derived taxa the ovules are no longer (only) inserted axillary, but (additionally) terminal at the end of the cone axis or they alternate to the terminal cone scales (Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Juniperus). Such non-axillary ovules could be regarded as derived from axillary ones (Microbiota) or they develop directly from the apical meristem and represent elements of a terminal short-shoot (Tetraclinis, Juniperus).
Carolina Sapphire' Smooth Arizona Cypress by Stem Cuttings: Effects of Growth Stage, Type of Cutting, and IBA Treatment1

This Journal of Environmental Horticulture article is reproduced with the consent of the Horticultural Research Institute (HRI – www.hriresearch.org), which was established in 1962 as the research and development affiliate of the American Nursery & Landscape Association (ANLA – http://www.anla.org). HRI’s Mission: To direct, fund, promote and communicate horticultural research, which increases the quality and value of ornamental plants, improves the productivity and profitability of the nursery and landscape industry, and protects and enhances the environment. The use of any trade name in this article does not imply an endorsement of the equipment, product or process named, nor any criticism of any similar products that are not mentioned. Copyright, All Rights Reserved Research Reports Propagation of 'Carolina Sapphire' Smooth Arizona Cypress by Stem Cuttings: Effects of Growth Stage, Type of Cutting, and IBA Treatment1 2 Hunter L. Stubbs , Frank A. Blazich, Thomas G. Ranney, and Stuart L. Warren Department ofHorticultural Science North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609 r----------------- Abstract -------------------, Stem cuttings of 'Carolina Sapphire' smooth Arizona cypress [Cupressus arizonica var. glabra (Sudw.) Little 'Carolina Sapphire'] consisting of 30 cm (12 in) terminals or distal [terminal 15 cm (6 in)] and proximal [basal 15 cm (6 in)] halves of 30 cm (12 in) terminals were taken on three dates associated with specific growth stages (semi-hardwood, hardwood, and softwood). Cuttings were treated with indolebutyric acid (IBA) in 500/0 isopropanol ranging from 0 to 16,000 ppm (1.6%) and placed under intermittent mist. Regardless of cutting type and auxin treatment, cuttings rooted at each growth stage.
Cupressus Arizonica (Arizona Cypress) Arizona Cypress Is Originated from Arizona

Cupressus arizonica (Arizona Cypress) Arizona cypress is originated from Arizona. Very fast growing evergreen tree can reach 10-15 m. The leaves are bluish- graying in color with a distinctive orange smell. The brown cones appear around the summer time and persist on the tree. The peeling brown bark becomes gray with age. Arizona cypress used as a specimen or windbreak as it can tolerate hot and dry conditions. Landscape Information French Name: Cyprès de l'Arizona ﺳﺮﻭ ﺃﺭﻳﺰﻭﻧﻲ :Arabic Name Pronounciation: koo-PRESS-us air-ih-ZAWN- ih-kuh Plant Type: Tree Origin: Southwestern United States Heat Zones: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Hardiness Zones: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Uses: Screen, Hedge, Topiary, Specimen, Windbreak Size/Shape Growth Rate: Moderate Tree Shape: Pyramidal Canopy Symmetry: Symmetrical Canopy Density: Dense Canopy Texture: Fine Height at Maturity: 8 to 15 m Spread at Maturity: 5 to 8 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 20 to 50 Years Plant Image Cupressus arizonica (Arizona Cypress) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Opposite Leaf Venation: Nearly Invisible Leaf Persistance: Evergreen Leaf Type: Simple Leaf Blade: Less than 5 Leaf Shape: Scale Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Waxy Leaf Scent: Pleasant Color(growing season): Silver Flower Flower Image Flower Showiness: False Flower Color: Yellow Seasons: Year Round Trunk Trunk Susceptibility to Breakage: Suspected to breakage Number of Trunks: Single Trunk Trunk Esthetic Values: Showy Fruit Fruit Type: Cones Fruit Showiness: True Fruit Size Range: 1.5 - 3 Fruit Colors:
Recommended Native and Adapted Plants for KB Home in Boerne

Recommended Native and Adapted Plants for Boerne Native Plant Society of Texas - Boerne Chapter www.npsot.org/boerne Using native and well-adapted plants to landscape will save time and money. Once established, natives require less water, fertilizer, pesticides, and maintenance than most non-natives. Before buying plants, identify the characteristics of your yard, such as how much morning and afternoon sun or shade you have, available moisture, and drainage. All these will impact plant survival and the plant selections you make. Choose plants that are suited to your site. Use a variety of heights in your design. For example, plant a canopy tree to provide shade. Plant understory (U) trees, shade-loving shrubs, and shade tolerant perennials under existing canopy trees. Not only will your landscape be more appealing, but you will have a better survival rate when you provide some shade for plants that need protection from the blistering Texas sun. Consider leaving any existing native vegetation undisturbed, as these areas will be very low-maintenance, and will help preserve the “Hill Country Heritage” that attracts many people to this area. You may enhance these native areas by adding favorite compatible selections for increased color or wildlife food to attract hummingbirds , butterflies , and songbirds to your yard. In general, avoid acid-living plants as the soil in central Texas is very alkaline. Also, avoid water-requiring plants as the average rainfall in the area is usually only around 30 inches per year. This list includes non-native plants which grow compatibly with drought-tolerant native plants. These are listed because of their hardiness in the Hill Country soil and climate and because of their availability in local nurseries.
Cupressus Pygmaea Is a Valid Species

Bull. CCP 1 (2): 27-33 J. Bisbee & D. Mаеrki Cupressus pygmaea (Lemmon) Sargent 1901 Cupressus pygmaea is a valid species In 1895 Lemmon described a new taxon from Mendocino County, and recognising its affinity with Cupressus goveniana Gordon (1849), but with enough differences to separate it from the later, he described it as a variety Cupressus goveniana var. pigmaea 1. Six years later, considering the tiny black seeds and that the isolation of the region which it inhabits remote from that occupied by other Species make it possible and convenient to separate this northern tree from the Cupressus Goveniana of central and southern California, Sargent (1901) raised this taxon to specific rank as Cupressus pygmaea 2. C.B.Wolf (1948) acknowledged this view and stressed the fact that it is necessary and possible to look for distinct characters not visible on dry herbarium material. E.Little (1953) chose to reduce several new world Cupressus species to synonymy. Cupressus pygmaea, Cupressus abramsiana Wolf and Cupressus sargentii Jepson were simply merged into Cupressus goveniana 3 and given as synonyms. In 1970, he revised his opinion of systematic synonymisation, but did not choose to return them back to species rank. He reduced the different Cupressus species to varietal rank, four as Cupressus arizonica Greene varieties, two as Cupressus goveniana varieties, one as a variety of Cupressus guadalupensis Watson, and finally admitting Cupressus sargentii as a valid species. Despite Wolf, and arguing about the fact that this author gave hint that these new combinations could be acceptable, he justified his choice almost exclusively by very broad morphological considerations.
Phoenix AMA LWUPL

Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
IAWA List of Microscopic Features for Softwood Identification 1

IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 1 IAWA LIST OF MICROSCOPIC FEATURES FOR SOFTWOOD IDENTIFICATION IAWA Committee Pieter Baas – Leiden, The Netherlands Nadezhda Blokhina – Vladivostok, Russia Tomoyuki Fujii – Ibaraki, Japan Peter Gasson – Kew, UK Dietger Grosser – Munich, Germany Immo Heinz – Munich, Germany Jugo Ilic – South Clayton, Australia Jiang Xiaomei – Beijing, China Regis Miller – Madison, WI, USA Lee Ann Newsom – University Park, PA, USA Shuichi Noshiro – Ibaraki, Japan Hans Georg Richter – Hamburg, Germany Mitsuo Suzuki – Sendai, Japan Teresa Terrazas – Montecillo, Mexico Elisabeth Wheeler – Raleigh, NC, USA Alex Wiedenhoeft – Madison, WI, USA Edited by H.G. Richter, D. Grosser, I. Heinz & P.E. Gasson © 2004. IAWA Journal 25 (1): 1–70 Published for the International Association of Wood Anatomists at the Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden, The Netherlands 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 2 IAWA Journal, Vol. 25 (1), 2004 IAWA List of microscopic features for softwood identification 3 PREFACE A definitive list of anatomical features of softwoods has long been needed. The hard- wood list (IAWA Committee 1989) has been adopted throughout the world, not least because it provides a succinct, unambiguous illustrated glossary of hardwood charac- ters that can be used for a variety of purposes, not just identification. This publication is intended to do the same job for softwoods. Identifying softwoods relies on careful observation of a number of subtle characters, and great care has been taken to show high quality photomicrographs that remove most of the ambiguity that definitions alone would provide. Unlike the Hardwood Committee, the Softwood Committee never met in its full com- position.
CUPRESSACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M

Comparative Seed Manual: CUPRESSACEAE Christine Pang, Darla Chenin, and Amber M. VanDerwarker (Completed, October 23, 2019) This seed manual consists of photos and relevant information on plant species housed in the Integrative Subsistence Laboratory at the Anthropology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara. The impetus for the creation of this manual was to enable UCSB graduate students to have access to comparative materials when making in-field identifications. Most of the plant species included in the manual come from New World locales with an emphasis on Eastern North America, California, Mexico, Central America, and the South American Andes. Published references consulted1: 1998. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American ethnobotany. Vol. 879. Portland, OR: Timber press. 2009. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American medicinal plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. 2010. Moerman, Daniel E. Native American food plants: an ethnobotanical dictionary. OR: Timber Press. Species included herein: Cupressus arizonica Hesperocyparis sargentii Juniperus californica 1 Disclaimer: Information on relevant edible and medicinal uses comes from a variety of sources, both published and internet-based; this manual does NOT recommend using any plants as food or medicine without first consulting a medical professional. Cupressus arizonica Family: Cupressaceae Common Names: Arizona cypress, Blue ice, Glabra, Glauca, Golden pyramid, Smooth cypress Habitat and Growth Habit: This plant grows in the southwestern United States and Mexico. The Arizona cypress is the only cypress at this time that is found to be native to the southwest. It can be distributed along rocky mountain slopes and canyon edges. Human Uses: The Arizona cypress is used for many ornamental purposes due to its coloring and aroma.