Agilent Understanding and Improving Network Analyzer Application Note 1363-1 Introduction

Achieving the highest possible net- Achievable dynamic range depends work analyzer dynamic range is upon the measurement application as extremely important when character- shown in Figure 1. izing many types of microwave devices, and in some cases the key factor in determining measurement performance. To achieve the greatest P dynamic range from a network mea- max surement system, it is important to understand the essence of dynamic range and the methods that can be Receiver employed to increase it. Armed with P this knowledge, the designer can ref Dynamic choose the method that achieves the best results with the least impact on Range other instrument parameters such as System measurement speed. Dynamic Network analyzer dynamic range is Range essentially the range of power that the system can measure, specifically: P •Pmax: The highest input power min level that the system can measure before unacceptable errors occur Figure 1. in the measurement, usually determined by the network • System dynamic range: The analyzer receiver's compression dynamic range that can be specification. realized without amplification •Pref: The nominal power available such as when measuring passive at the test port from the network components such as attenuators analyzer's source. and filters. •Pmin : The minimum input power level the system can measure (its • Receiver dynamic range: The sensitivity), set by the receiver's system’s true dynamic range if it is floor. Pmin depends on the considered a receiver. An amplifi- IF bandwidth, averaging, and the er may be required to realize the test set configuration. receiver’s full dynamic range. This can be the device under test or an The two common definitions for external amplifier added to the dynamic range are: measurement system. • Receiver dynamic range = Pmax – Pmin • System dynamic range = Pref – Pmin

2 Noise floor defined

The receiver's noise floor is an impor- Agilent’s new PNA series vector net- tant network analyzer specification work analyzers use the RMS value to that helps determine its dynamic define receiver noise floor. This is a range. Unfortunately, “noise floor” is commonly used definition, and is not a well-defined term and it has easy to understand because it is the been defined several ways over the receiver's equivalent input noise years. power.

The results of an experiment to com- pare some common noise floor defini- tions are shown in Figure 2. In this experiment, Gaussian random noise with a noise power of –100 dBm was simulated, and the noise floor was calculated using four definitions:

• The solid line shows the RMS value of the noise, which is equal to the noise power of –100 dBm. • The dashed line (–101 dBm) is the mean value of the linear magni- tude of the noise, converted to dBm. • The dotted line (–102.4 dBm) is the mean value of the log magni- tude of the noise. • The dot-dash line (–92.8 dBm) is the sum of the mean value of the linear magnitude of the noise and three times its standard deviation, Figure 2. Various noise floor definitions converted to dBm. Improving dynamic range

In some measurement situations, it is desirable to increase the network ana- lyzer’s dynamic range beyond the level obtained with the default settings. Noise floor sets the minimum power level that the instrument can measure and thus limits its dynamic range. Noise floor can be improved by using averaging, or by reducing the system bandwidth (IF BW).

Smoothing is another technique that is often considered to be akin to averag- ing and IF BW adjustment, but it does not reduce the noise floor. Smoothing is adjacent-point averaging of the for- matted data, similar to video filtering. Trace-to-trace (or sweep-to-sweep) averaging operates on the pre-format- ted, vector data, so that it can actually reduce the noise power. This key dif- ference is responsible for the inability of smoothing to reduce noise floor, although it does reduce small peak-to- peak variations of noise on a trace.1

3 Averaging IF BW reduction and exhibits a Gaussian probability The PNA Series and many other net- The IF BW of the system can be distribution (which can be proved by work analyzers perform sweep-to- altered via the front panel or remote the central limit theorem3). sweep averaging by taking an expo- programming, and its value will affect nentially weighted average of the data the digital filtering that is performed A high level of confidence in the rela- points from each sweep. Exponen- on the data collected in the analyzer’s tionship between noise floor and IF tially weighting the samples in the receivers. Decreasing IF BW will BW makes it possible to precisely cal- data set allows averaging to proceed reduce noise floor by filtering out culate the noise floor reduction without termination, even after the noise that is outside the bandwidth of achieved by decreasing the IF BW. An desired averaging factor has been the digital filter. empirical study was performed using reached. The averaging is performed the PNA network analyzer in which on complex data, which means that The low level noise that is present in the RMS noise level was measured at the data is averaged vectorially. the analyzer’s receiver chain is caused 5 different CW frequencies (1, 3, 5, 7, by thermal noise arising from the and 9 GHz). There were 801 points in Many signal analyzers use scalar aver- thermal agitation of electrons in resis- the sweep and the IF BW was set to 1 aging, which mitigates only the vari- tances. Consequently, it is directly Hz, 10 Hz, 100 Hz, 1 kHz, and 10 kHz. ance of the noise but does not affect proportional to bandwidth. The mean- The noise floor of the VNA was mea- the average noise level. When a trace square value of the thermal noise sured with no signal present at the that contains both coherent signal voltage is given by: test ports. In Figure 3, the observed and uncorrelated noise is averaged in relationship between the noise floor the vector sense, the noise compo- E 2 = 4RkTB and the IF BW shows that the PNA’s nent will approach zero, and the RMS noise floor very closely follows resulting trace will show the desired where the theoretical expectation. Deviation signal with less noise present. When k is Boltzmann's constant from theory is negligible. viewed with the log magnitude format (1.38 e-23 joules/) on the network analyzer display, it T is the absolute temperature in As with averaging, decreasing IF BW becomes clear that the average noise degrees Kelvin to reduce noise floor reduces mea- level is reduced and an improvement R is the resistive component in surement speed. While it could be in dynamic range is achieved. ohms expected that a factor-of-10 decrease B is the bandwidth in Hertz in IF BW will reduce the noise floor Using the averaging function available by 10 dB and will cause a factor-of-10 in most vector network analyzers, sig- The noise power delivered to a com- increase in measurement time, this is nal-to-noise ratio is improved by 3 dB plex conjugate load is not always true because the digital fil- for every factor-of-2 increase in aver- ters used in a network analyzer at dif- ages. This is a powerful method for Pn = E 2 = kTB ferent IF bandwidths may vary in reducing noise floor. However, it also 4R shape. In the PNA Series for example, reduces measurement speed because sweep time increases by a factor that when two traces must be averaged, This is the familiar ‘kTB’ relationship is less than 10 for a factor-of-10 measurement time doubles. for noise power2. reduction in IF BW. This means that to achieve the same reduction in Averaging can only be used on ratioed Noise is random in nature and is con- noise floor, IF BW reduction will measurements, and will not work on sidered nondeterministic because it is reduce measurement speed less than measurements using a single receiver caused by a collection of small events will averaging. channel. Averaging is not allowed on unratioed measurements because phase is random in this mode and averaging (which is performed in the complex domain), will always cause the result to approach zero.

Figure 3. RMS noise floor vs IF BW (n=801 pts)

4 Choosing the best method There are other factors that can be considered when deciding which To achieve noise floor reduction, This example uses a fairly fast IF BW, method to choose for increasing averaging can be increased or IF BW and shows that IF BW reduction pro- dynamic range in a given measure- reduced. If measurement speed is not duces a benefit over averaging when ment application. Using averaging to of paramount concern, either method attempting to improve dynamic range. reduce noise floor allows the user to will work equally well. The time However, now consider a slower observe the traces on the PNA screen required to acquire and process data sweep mode (i.e., lower IF BW). If the as the averaging progresses, which for a trace (called cycle time), PNA is set at an IF BW of 100 Hz and some designers may find useful. IF includes not only sweep time, but a noise floor reduction of 10 dB is BW reduction works on both ratioed also retrace time, band-crossing time, desired, averaging with a factor of 10 and unratioed measurements (unlike and display update time. can be applied, or the IF BW can be averaging which only works in reduced to 10 Hz. Table 2 shows the ratioed mode), which can be the Since averaging requires taking multi- impact on sweep time. determining factor in some situations. ple traces and updates the display every time, it generally takes slightly Table 2 Sweep time impact with slow IF BWs longer to use averaging than IF BW reduction, especially if many averages Noise floor reduction (dB) Sweep time increase factor are required. It is important to remember that much of the difference 100 Hz 10 averages 10 10 in impact on measurement time is 10 Hz 0 averages 10 9.9 caused by the digital filtering per- formed for the various IF BWs. This 100 Hz 100 averages 20 100 effect manifests itself in the sweep 1 Hz 0 averages 20 99.5 time component of the cycle time, so to determine the effect of the two noise-floor-reduction methods on measurement time, it is appropriate The increase in cycle time closely The PNA Series provides a large num- to consider sweep time only. parallels the increase in sweep time, ber of IF BWs to choose from, which and it is evident that using IF BW gives the designer wide flexibility in Consider the PNA Series set up in a reduction to attain increased dynamic desired noise floor reduction while 10 KHz IF BW. If an improvement of range has an advantage over averag- incurring the smallest possible reduc- 10 dB is desired in dynamic range, it ing in terms of impact on measure- tion in measurement speed. In many can be achieved by averaging 10 ment speed if the network analyzer is situations, dynamic range can be sweeps or setting the IF BW to in a fast sweep mode. With a slow increased by using both averaging 1 KHz. Table 1 shows the effect on sweep mode, impact on measurement and IF BW adjustment. sweep time for the two approaches to speed is essentially the same for achieve a dynamic range improve- either of the two methods. ment of 10 or 20 dB.

Table 1 Sweep time impact with fast IF BWs

Noise floor reduction (dB) Sweep time increase factor 10 KHz 10 averages 10 10 1 KHz 0 averages 10 7.75 10 KHz 100 averages 20 100 100 Hz 0 averages 20 74.8

5 Dynamic range, segmented sweep and the configurable test set

For applications in which speed and In the reject band, where noise floor wide dynamic range must both be contributes significantly to measure- optimized, the segmented sweep fea- ment error, the IF BW can be set low ture available on some network ana- enough to achieve the desired reduc- lyzers is useful. This feature is tion in average noise level. To extremely valuable when measuring increase the dynamic range of the filters that demand simultaneous analyzer even further, segmented characterization of the passband at a sweep can be used in conjunction high power level, and the reject band with a re-configuration of the test-set at a very low power level. Segmented (Figure 4). An increase in dynamic sweep allows the user to break a fre- range of 12 to 15 dB can be achieved quency sweep into multiple segments, with this method by reversing the each with its own stop and start fre- directional coupler in the receiving quency, IF BW, power level, and num- test port. ber of points. When measuring a fil- ter, the IF BW in the passband can be set wider for a fast sweep rate, as long as high level trace noise is kept sufficiently small.

Source

Switch/Splitter/Leveler

R1Reference Reference R2 Receiver Receiver 70 dB 70 dB

A B

36 dB 36 dB

Measurement Receivers

R1 R1 A A B R2 R2 Source B OUT IN Coupler OUT IN IN OUT Coupler Source IN OUT OUT IN IN OUT

DUT Figure 4.

6 Summary References

Network analyzer dynamic range is 1. Robert A. Witte, Spectrum and the most critical parameter in many Network Measurements, Upper measurement situations, and it can be Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice increased by reducing noise floor Hall PTR, Inc., 1993. through averaging or IF BW reduc- 2. H.L. Krauss, C.W. Bostian, and F.H. tion. However, each method has dis- Raab, Solid State Radio advantages that determine its suitabil- Engineering, New York, NY: John ity in certain cases, and has a unique Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1980, pp. 11-24. effect on measurement speed. 3. Alberto Leon-Garcia, Probability Beyond these two methods, further and Random Process for Electrical dynamic range improvement can be Engineering, 2nd ed., New York, obtained and measurement speed NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing retained by using the segmented Company, Inc., 1994. sweep feature found in network ana- lyzers such as Agilent’s PNA Series, as well as a configurable test set.

7 Agilent Technologies’ For more assistance with your test Test and Measurement and measurement needs go to Support, Services, and Assistance Agilent Technologies aims to maximize the www.agilent.com/find/assist value you receive, while minimizing your risk and problems. We strive to ensure that Or contact the test and measurement you get the test and measurement capabil- experts at Agilent Technologies ities you paid for and obtain the support (During normal business hours) you need. Our extensive support resources and services can help you choose the right United States: Agilent products for your applications and (tel) 1 800 452 4844 apply them successfully. Every instrument and system we sell has a global warranty. Canada: Support is available for at least five years (tel) 1 877 894 4414 beyond the production life of the product. (fax) (905) 206 4120 Two concepts underlie Agilent's overall support policy: “Our Promise” and “Your Europe: Advantage.” (tel) (31 20) 547 2000

Our Promise Japan: Our Promise means your Agilent test and (tel) (81) 426 56 7832 measurement equipment will meet its adver- (fax) (81) 426 56 7840 tised performance and functionality. When you are choosing new equipment, we will Latin America: help you with product information, including (tel) (305) 267 4245 realistic performance specifications and (fax) (305) 267 4286 practical recommendations from experienced test engineers. When you use Agilent Australia: equipment, we can verify that it works (tel) 1 800 629 485 properly, help with product operation, and (fax) (61 3) 9272 0749 provide basic measurement assistance for the use of specified capabilities, at no New Zealand: extra cost upon request. Many self-help (tel) 0 800 738 378 tools are available. (fax) 64 4 495 8950

Your Advantage Asia Pacific: Your Advantage means that Agilent offers a (tel) (852) 3197 7777 wide range of additional expert test and (fax) (852) 2506 9284 measurement services, which you can purchase according to your unique techni- Product specifications and descriptions cal and business needs. Solve problems in this document subject to change efficiently and gain a competitive edge by without notice. contacting us for calibration, extra-cost upgrades, out-of-warranty repairs, and Copyright © 2000 on-site education and training, as well as Agilent Technologies design, system integration, project manage- Printed in USA 09/00 ment, and other professional services. 5980-2778EN Experienced Agilent engineers and techni- cians worldwide can help you maximize your productivity, optimize the return on investment of your Agilent instruments and systems, and obtain dependable mea- surement accuracy for the life of those products.