DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan Table of Contents PURPOSE AND OVERVIEW .......................................................................................4 BACKGROUND & METHODOLOGY........................................................................5 TRENDS, ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES .....................................................................6 SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC PATTERNS & TRENDS.................................................................13 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS............................................................................20 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #1 - ECONOMIC VIABILITY..............................................20 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #2 – SAFETY AND SECURITY...........................................21 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #3 – ACCESSIBILITY AND MOBILITY OPTIONS FOR PEOPLE AND FREIGHT...............................................................................................................22 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #4 – ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY CONSERVATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE .........................................................................................................22 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #5 – TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIVITY...........................23 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #6 – SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION................24 FEDERAL PLANNING FACTOR #7 – SYSTEM PRESERVATION ..........................................25 EXISTING MODAL CONDITIONS...........................................................................25 AVIATION.....................................................................................................................25 Bradford County Airport .........................................................................................25 Grand Canyon Airport.............................................................................................26 Skyhaven Airport .....................................................................................................28 Blue Swan Airport ...................................................................................................28 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport ..........................................................28 Elmira-Corning Regional Airport............................................................................29 Greater Binghamton Airport/Edwin A. Link Field...................................................29 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ..................................................................................................30 ROADWAY NETWORKS .................................................................................................33 Networks..................................................................................................................33 BRIDGES.......................................................................................................................35 RAIL FREIGHT ..............................................................................................................37 Norfolk Southern .....................................................................................................38 CPRail.....................................................................................................................40 Wellsboro & Corning Railroad ...............................................................................40 Towanda-Monroeton Shippers Lifeline, Inc.............................................................41 Reading, Blue Mountain & Northern Railroad........................................................41 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ............................................................................................42 INTERCITY BUS ............................................................................................................45 OTHER TRANSPORTATION CONCERNS .............................................................46 ACCESS MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................46 1 Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan Cross Access Drives ................................................................................................46 Shared Parking Areas..............................................................................................47 Driveway Spacing....................................................................................................47 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................47 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ............................................................................................48 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)...........................................................50 BEYOND THE BORDERS ................................................................................................50 Binghamton .............................................................................................................51 Elmira......................................................................................................................51 Scranton/Wilkes-Barre ............................................................................................52 Steuben County, NY.................................................................................................53 Williamsport ............................................................................................................54 FINANCIAL PLAN.......................................................................................................56 COUNTY CATEGORIZED CANDIDATE PROCESS/PROJECTS .............................................60 CONCLUSION - IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................64 2 Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan Acknowledgements The Gannett Fleming project team expresses its appreciation to the following individuals for their guidance, insights and participation toward the successful completion of this long-range plan. Their active review of our preliminary documents, constructive dialog and enthusiasm for this effort is greatly valued. Brian Baker, NTRPDC Richard Biery, NTRPDC Dave Bubniak, NTRPDC Mike Castellano, Wyoming County citizen Erick Coolidge, Tioga County Commissioner Gary Connelly, PENNDOT 3-0∗ Steve Gayle, Broome Metropolitan Transportation Study Kerry Gyekis, Tioga County Susan Hazelton, PENNDOT District 4-0 Mike Hufnagel, Sullivan County Fred LaVancher, Tioga County citizen Tony Litwin, Wyoming County Commissioner John Logan, Bradford County citizen Jeffrey Loomis, Susquehanna County Commissioner** Mike Mausteller, PENNDOT District 3-0 Vivian McCarty, Endless Mountains Visitor’s Bureau*** Norman Miller, Sullivan County citizen William Ord, Susquehanna County Bob Raves, PENNDOT Central Office Betty Reibson, Sullivan County Commissioner Dean Roberts, PENNDOT Central Office Nancy Schrader, Bradford County Commissioner**** Matt Smoker, FHWA Raymond Stolinas, Bradford County Robert Templeton, Susquehanna County Anthony Ventello, Central Bradford Progress Authority Paul Weilage, Wyoming County Gannett Fleming Consulting Team Brian Funkhouser, Project Manager Keith Chase, Quality Assurance Patrick Anater, Project Planner Josie Boyer, Project Planner ∗ Retired, March 28, 2003 ** Replaced Commissioner Cal Dean *** Retired, July 19, 2003 **** Replaced Commissioner John Sullivan 3 Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan Purpose and Overview In January 2000, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PENNDOT) unveiled PennPlan, its current long-range transportation plan for 2000 - 2025. The new plan represented a significant break from previous Department efforts in that it took a corridors-based approach to transportation planning. As part of the planning effort, PENNDOT identified 28 corridors of statewide significance, including three in the Northern Tier planning region, in order to analyze significant trends, issues and opportunities for future consideration in regional and statewide transportation planning and programming. Through the development of Corridor Profiles, which examined issues across several planning areas, including transportation, socio-economic and environmental, the plan combined the hard data available at the federal and state level with important issues and perspectives from local transportation users and providers. The PennPlan profiles were developed to be dynamic, allowing for updates of data and new analysis as conditions change. In October 2002, the Northern Tier Regional Planning and Development Commission (NTRPDC) followed PENNDOT’s lead and began developing its own long-range plan using the PennPlan model. This direction was also consistent with federal policy which strongly promotes the need for and value of long range transportation planning. NTRPDC, under the auspices of the Rural Transportation Advisory Committee (RTAC) identified 15 corridors of regional significance as shown in Table 1. Table 1: Corridors of Regional Significance NORTHERN TIER Corridor Name Centered On Length (Miles) PA Route 6 Heritage US 6 157 Endless Mountains US 11/ I-81 27 Williamson Road US 15 37 North Branch US 220 73 Williamsport & Elmira PA 14 43 County Seat Connector PA 29 67 Cowanesque PA 49 29 North Sullivan PA 87 54 Owego Turnpike PA 167 30 Lackawanna PA 171 39 Philip P. Bliss PA 187 46 Central Tioga PA 287 36 Elmira Connector PA 328 14 PB&E PA 414 62 Bluestone PA 706 34 4 Northern Tier Long Range Transportation Plan The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 21 – Thicket/Shrub Habitats - Content Summary
    Pennsylvania’s Wildlife Action Plan Version 1.0a ________________________________________________________________________ SECTION 21 – THICKET/SHRUB HABITATS - CONTENT SUMMARY 21.1 Location and Condition of Thicket/Shrubland Habitats Table 21.1: Barrens community types found in Pennsylvania. 21.2 Threats to Shrubland Habitats in Pennsylvania 21.3 Shrubland-Associated Species Table 21.2: WAP-Priority species associated with temporal shrublands/early successional forest in Pennsylvania. Table 21.3: WAP-Priority species associated with barrens habitats in Pennsylvania. 21.4 Shrubland-Associated Wildlife Trends Figure 21.1: Distribution of declining early successional species from Breeding Bird Atlas records. 21.5 Conservation and Management Needs of Thicket Habitats Management of Reclaimed Strip-Mines as Shrublands Education and Outreach Development of Best Management Practices Targeted Management of Barrens Statewide Planning 21.6 STATEWIDE PRIORITIZED CONSERVATION ACTIONS – THICKETS Level 1 – highest priority over the next 1-5 years Targeted Management of Priority Thicket Habitats Develop Multi-Species Management Guidance Technical Assistance to Private Landowners Permitting of Future Mineland Reclamation Level 2 – priority over the next 5-10 years Develop a Statewide Management Strategy for Thickets Convert Small Grassland Sites (<6 hectares) to Shrublands 21.7 STATEWIDE PRIORITIZED CONSERVATION ACTIONS – THICKET- ASSOCIATED SPECIES Level 1 – highest priority over the next 1-5 years Habitat Restoration/Protection for Highest-Priority Species
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report (2012): at Your Best Lehigh Valley Health Network
    Lehigh Valley Health Network LVHN Scholarly Works LVHN Annual & Statistical Reports 2012 Annual Report (2012): At Your Best Lehigh Valley Health Network Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/reports Recommended Citation Lehigh Valley Health Network, "Annual Report (2012): At Your Best" (2012). LVHN Annual & Statistical Reports. http://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/reports/29 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by LVHN Scholarly Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in LVHN Annual & Statistical Reports by an authorized administrator of LVHN Scholarly Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. otyourbest ANNUAL REPORT 2012 ••••••••••••••• • • ................................,...-", .•• lehigh Valley ~ Health Network 2 LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK Picture yourself at your best. What do you see? Perhaps you are surrounded by family and friends, enjoying the companionship of those most dear to you. Maybe you see yourself as a member of a team, working alongside others to achieve something remarkable. Or perhaps you are volunteering your time and talents to make our community a better place to live. No matter how you view yourself, you need one essential ingredient to be at your best - good health. At Lehigh Valley Health Network, we are driven to help you reach your maximum potential. Your road to good health begins with our 11,800 colleagues. They are skilled, experienced and compassionate people who are proud to be part of our health network. They nurture our caring culture, are motivated to make a difference, and share A Passion for Better Medicine. You inspire that passion. You are the reason we deliver quality care, provide valuable education and conduct innovative research.
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECTING to COLLECTIONS PENNSYLVANIA a Five-Year Preservation Plan for Pennsylvania PROJECT OVERVIEW
    CONNECTING TO COLLECTIONS PENNSYLVANIA a five-year preservation plan for Pennsylvania PROJECT OVERVIEW Imagining Our Future: Preserving Pennsylvania’s Collections, published in August 2009, includes an in-depth analysis of conditions and needs at Pennsylvania’s collecting institutions, a detailed preservation plan to improve collections care throughout the state, and a five-year implementation timetable (2010-2015). The analysis concludes that many of Pennsylvania’s most important historic holdings must be considered at risk. Millions of items comprise these collections, and the financial resources available to care for them are limited and shrinking. Pennsylvania is a state vibrant with world-class art museums, libraries, historic sites. Arts and culture play a substantial role in creating business, jobs, and bringing revenue into the state and stewardship of its artifacts is too important —to the state, to the people, to the history of country—to be ignored. This call to action is a rallying cry for all future generations of Pennsylvanians. With generous support from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, and in close partnership with three leading preservation organizations, the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC), the Pennsylvania Federation of Museums and Historical Organizations (PFMHO), and LYRASIS, the Conservation Center for Arts & Historic Artifacts organized and led the assessment and planning process. The project was capably guided by a Task Force with representatives from the Office of (PA) Commonwealth Libraries, the Western Pennsylvania Museum Council, the Pennsylvania Caucus of the Mid- Atlantic Regional Archives Conference, Pennsylvania State University, the Philadelphia Area Consortium of Special Collections Libraries, the University of Pittsburgh, and Carnegie Mellon University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of the Pocono Summer Camp Industry
    The Economic Impacts of the Pocono Summer Camp Industry Prepared for: The Wayne County Camp Alliance by: Shepstone Management Company, Inc. (Assisted by Wayne County Planning Department) December 2016 The Economic Impact of the Pocono Summer Camp Industry Acknowledgments The consultants and the Board of Directors of the Wayne County Camp Alliance wish to thank all those who par;cipated in and supported this study, including the members of the Alliance, alumni, parents and employees who completed surveys. The Wayne County Planning Department also generously assisted with data collec;on and mapping as a major contributor to this report. The report could not have been completed without its help. We strongly urge this report be widely disseminated to as many officials and ci;zens within Wayne, Pike and Monroe Coun;es and the Commonwealth as well as others to demonstrate the astonishing impact of the camp industry on both the economy and quality of life of Pocono life, not to men;on the children who aGend camp here. Shepstone Management Company, Inc. Page i Planning and Research Consultants The Economic Impact of the Pocono Summer Camp Industry Table of Contents Acknowledgments i Table of Contents ii Table of Figures iii Summary of Key Findings iv 1.0 Study Background and Methodology 1-1 2.0 Overview of the Pocono Summer Camping Industry 2-1 3.0 Pocono Camp Characteris;cs 3-1 4.0 Direct Impacts of Summer Camps 4-1 5.0 Contribu;ons of the Camp Industry to the Local Economy 5-1 6.0 Recommenda;ons 6-1 Appendices: 1 - Wayne County Camp Alliance Membership 2 - Alumni, Camp, Employee and Parent Survey Forms Shepstone Management Company, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • AVP Brochure.Pdf
    THE AIRPORT The Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport is owned and operated by the Counties of Lackawanna and Luzerne in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Airport is a jointly owned entity of Luzerne and Lackawanna counties controlled by six (6) Board Members: three from Lackawanna County and three from Luzerne County who preside as the Bi-County Airport Board. The airport is in Avoca, Pennsylvania, near the border of Luzerne County and Lackawanna County, midway between Wilkes-Barre and Scranton. It is the fifth largest airport in Pennsylvania measured by passenger boarding and is known as "your gateway to Northeastern Pennsylvania and the Pocono Mountains". AVP offers area travelers approximately 30 daily arrivals and departures to seven non-stop destinations, with one-stop service to hundreds of destinations worldwide. Air service is provided by the following airlines: Allegiant (Orlando-Sanford); Delta Connection (Atlanta and Detroit); United (Chicago-O'Hare and Newark); and US Airways Express (Charlotte and Philadelphia). Other significant operators include FBO Aviation Technologies, several car rental agencies, U.S. Customs and a life flight helicopter. New Terminal - The first passengers strolled into the Joseph M. McDade Terminal Building on May 25, 2006, and the Wilkes- Barre/Scranton International Airport stepped into a new era. The $41.5 million structure made of steel, stone and glass replaces the 47-year-old terminal next to it. At about 131,000 square feet, the Joseph M. McDade Terminal Building is about 70% larger than the old one, which opened in 1959, and was renovated in 1982 and 1991. The larger facility is designed to handle 360,000 or more departing passengers each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrisburg Division
    HARRISBURG DIVISION NORTHERN REGION TIMETABLE NUMBER 1 EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 19, 2015 COMMITTED TO SAFETY DOUBLE ZEROS ZERO INJURIES ZERO INCIDENTS HARRISBURG DIVISION TIMETABLE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Timetable General Information..................................................5 a. Train Dispatcher Contact Information…………………….4 b. Station Page........................................................................5 c. Explanation of Characters.................................................5 d. Diesel Unit Groups.............................................................6 e. Main Track Control.............................................................6 f. Division Special Instructions.............................................6 II. Harrisburg Division Station Pages.....................................7-263 III. Harrisburg Division Special Instructions......................265-269 NORFOLK SOUTHERN DIVISION HEADQUARTERS Train Dispatching Office 4600 Deer Path Road Harrisburg, PA 17110 Assistant Superintendent – Microwave 541-2146 Bell 717-541-2146 Dispatch Chief Dispatcher Microwave 541-2158 Bell 717-541-2158 Harrisburg East Dispatcher Microwave 541-2136 Bell 717-541-2136 Harrisburg Terminal Dispatcher Microwave 541-2138 Bell 717-541-2138 Lehigh Line Dispatcher Microwave 541-2139 Bell 717-541-2139 Southern Tier Dispatcher Microwave 541-2144 Bell 717-541-2144 Mainline Dispatcher Microwave 541-2142 Bell 717-541-2142 D&H Dispatcher Microwave 541-2143 Bell 717-541-2143 EMERGENCY 911 HARRISBURG DIVISION TIMETABLE GENERAL INFORMATION A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub 316 Bike 2/4 Revision
    Northeastern Pennsylvania Mountains PennDOT District Bicycling/Pedestrian Coordinators Chris King, - District 3 Steve Pohowsky, - District 5 Bradford and Sullivan Counties Monroe and Carbon Counties 715 Jordan Avenue 1002 Hamilton Street Montoursville, 17754 Allentown, 18101 (570) 368-4222 (610) 871-4490 [email protected] [email protected] April Hannon - District 4 Wayne, Pike, Wyoming, Susquehanna, Lackawanna & Luzerne Counties O'Neill Highway Dunmore, 18512 (570) 963-4076 [email protected] Planning Organizations Lackawanna County Regional Northeastern Pennsylvania Alliance Planning Commission 1151 Oak Street 507 Linden Avenue, 5th Floor Pittstown, 18640 Scranton, 18503 (570) 655-5581 Contact: Rob Ghigiarelli Contact: Alan S. Baranski (570) 963-6400 [email protected] [email protected] Northern Tier Regional Planning and Luzerne County Planning Commission Development Commission Luzerne Co. Court House 312 Main Street 200 N. River Street Towanda, 18848 Wilkes-Barre, 18711 (570) 265-9103 (570) 825-1564 Contact: Rick Biery Contact: Nancy Snee [email protected] [email protected] Tourism Promotion Agencies Tourism Promotion Agencies Luzerne County Convention and Endless Mountains Visitors Bureau Visitors Burea 4 Works Plaza, Tunkhannock, 18657 59 Public Square, Wilkes-Barre, 18701 (800) 769-8999 (570) 819-1877 www.susquehannabus.com www.tournepa.com Lackawanna County Convention Pocono Mountains Visitors Bureau, Inc. and Visitors Bureau 1004 Main Street, Stroudsburg, 18360 1300 Old Plank Road, Scranton, 18507 (800) 762-6667 (800) 229-3526 www.800poconos.com www.visitnepa.org Northeastern Pennsylvania Mountains 25 Bicycle Shops (Shops, listed alphabetically by city or town, sell and service bikes and provide maps or other touring information. Shops designated by an * also provide rentals) BRADFORD HONESDALE SCRANTON Allegheny Recreational *Northeast Sports Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Connecting
    CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL CONNECTING TRAILS EVALUATION STUDY 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 405 Annapolis, MD 21403 CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Executive Summary 3 Statement of Study Findings 5 Introduction 9 Research Team Reports 10 Anacostia River 11 Chester River 15 Choptank River 19 Susquehanna River 23 Upper James River 27 Upper Nanticoke River 30 Appendix: Research Teams’ Executive Summaries and Bibliographies 34 Anacostia River 34 Chester River 37 Choptank River 40 Susquehanna River 44 Upper James River 54 Upper Nanticoke River 56 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are truly thankful to the research and project team, led by John S. Salmon, for the months of dedicated research, mapping, and analysis that led to the production of this important study. In all, more than 35 pro- fessionals, including professors and students representing six universities, American Indian representatives, consultants, public agency representatives, and community leaders contributed to this report. Each person brought an extraordinary depth of knowledge, keen insight and a personal devotion to the project. We are especially grateful for the generous financial support that we received from the following private foundations, organizations and corporate partners: The Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Clay- ton Fund, Inc., Colcom Foundation, The Conservation Fund, Lockheed Martin, the Richard King Mellon Foundation, The Merrill Foundation, the Pennsylvania Environmental Council, the Rauch Foundation, The Peter Jay Sharp Foundation, Verizon, Virginia Environmental Endowment and the Wallace Genetic Foundation. Without their support this project would simply not have been possible. Finally, we would like to extend a special thank you to the board of directors of the Chesapeake Conser- vancy, and to John Maounis, Superintendent of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Office, for their leadership and unwavering commitment to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • February 9, 1996
    PB97-916301 NTSB/RAR-97/01 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT NEAR HEAD-ON COLLISION AND DERAILMENT OF TWO NEW JERSEY TRANSIT COMMUTER TRAINS NEAR SECAUCUS, NEW JERSEY FEBRUARY 9, 1996 6674A Abstract: This report explains the collision of two New Jersey Transit trains near Secaucus, New Jersey, on February 9, 1996. Three people were killed and 69 people were treated at area hospitals for minor to serious injuries sustained in this accident. The total estimated damage exceeded $3.3 million. From its investigation of this accident, the Safety Board identified the following safety issues: the medical condition of the engineer of train 1254, the adequacy of medical standards for locomotive engineers, and the adequacy of the response to the accident by New Jersey Transit train crewmembers. Based on its findings, the Safety Board made recommendations to the Federal Railroad Administration, the New Jersey Transit, the Association of American Railroads, the American Public Transit Association, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and the United Transportation Union. The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting avia- tion, railroad, highway, marine, pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, determine the probable cause of accidents, issue safety recommendations, study transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and statistical reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 — Background and Planning Context
    Chapter 1 1 BACKGROUND AND PLANNING CONTEXT 1 Background and Planning Context The West of the Hudson Regional Transit Access Study (WHRTAS) has been initiated by MTA Metro- North Railroad (Metro-North) in partnership with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority) and in cooperation with New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and New Jersey Transit (NJT) to improve mobility and accessibility in the West of Hudson region. Projected population and employment growth in Orange County, together with growth in ridership on Metro-North’s West of Hudson commuter service and a projected rise in Stewart International Airport (SWF) operations, necessitates the consideration of improved and expanded transit services for travelers in the region. WHRTAS evaluates alternatives for improving transit services between Central Orange County and Manhattan and access to SWF from the surrounding regions, Lower Hudson Valley and New York City. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is the lead federal agency for this study which is being conducted in accordance with FTA’s Alternatives Analysis requirements for New Starts program funds. The study also considered the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Extensive agency coordination and public outreach was implemented to obtain input and guidance throughout this study. This included the formation of a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), which reviewed study material, advised on technical issues, and coordinated with a broad array of elected officials, agencies, organizations, and the general public through direct communication, workshops, roundtable discussions, and open houses. WHRTAS is being conducted in two phases. Phase I is the initial Alternatives Analysis (AA) phase, which evaluates the benefits, costs, and impacts of broad range of transit alternatives with the potential to meet the project's goals and objectives and concludes with the recommendation of a short list of alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Performance Report
    PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Annual Performance Report Fiscal Year 2016-17 April 30, 2018 On the cover: Altoona Metro Transit, Southeastern Pennsylvania Amtrak Huntingdon-Bedford-Fulton Altoona, PA Transportation Authority Keystone Corridor Area Agency on Aging (dba AMTRAN) Philadelphia, PA Bedford, PA (dba SEPTA) (dba CART) Greyhound Lines New Castle Area Transit Authority, New Castle, PA (dba NCATA) Endless Mountains County of Lackawanna Transportation Authority Transit System Athens, PA (dba BeST) Scranton, PA (dba COLTS) Borough of Mount Carmel Area Transportation Authority Beaver County Port Authority of Mount Carmel, PA of North Central PA Transit Authority Allegheny County (dba Lower Anthracite Johnsonburg, PA Rochester, PA Pittsburgh, PA Transit System/LATS) (dba ATA) (dba BCTA) (dba PAAC) photos courtesy Michael Baker International and Whitehouse Group PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2016-17 April 30, 2018 Dear Pennsylvanians: I am honored to present the Pennsylvania Public Transportation Annual Performance Report for the 2016-17 fiscal year. This is PennDOT’s annual opportunity to showcase our partnership with Pennsylvania’s public transit agencies and the essential services they provide the residents of Pennsylvania. During the 2016-17 state fiscal year, passengers took more than 411 million trips via bus, light rail, trolley, inclined plane, and heavy rail. In addition to detailing the operating statistics for each transit agency and community transportation provider, this report highlights important
    [Show full text]
  • There's a Plan in Here with All Over
    There’s a plan in here with your name all over it. Your guide to finding just the right Individual or Family plan for you. For Benefit Period: January 1 to December 31, 2021 Plans may be offered by Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, Highmark Health Insurance Company, or Highmark Coverage Advantage. Go ahead. Get picky about your plan. With lots of great coverage options from Highmark, this book will help you find the plan, the product, and the network access that matters most to you. Looking for something in particular? You can easily navigate through the guide by clicking on the headings in the Table of Contents. Why choose Highmark? . 1 Affordable Care Act basics ������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 Financial help info ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������8 Enrollment dates ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Enrollment checklist ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11 Product and network highlights ���������������������������������������������������������������������12 Plan details by county . 26 Helpful health insurance definitions ������������������������������������������������������������ 41 Legal info ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 42 Why choose a Highmark health plan? Woah. So many reasons. Here are three big ones right off the top of our heads.
    [Show full text]