DOCSLIB.ORG

Cleanup Plan / Fort Ord Monterey, California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cleanup Plan / Fort Ord Monterey, California VERSION 2 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) / Cleanup Plan Fort Ord Monterey, California Prepared for: U.S. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND 21010 Prepared by: EARTH TECH 1420 KING STREET, SUITE 600 ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 Requestsfor this documentmustbe referredto: CommanderDLIFLCand POM Attm ATZP-EP(GailYoungblood) Presidioof Monterey Monterey,California 93944-5006 (408)242-7924 DECEMBER 1995 W5.TOC AEC Form 45, 1 Feb 93 repl aces THAMA Form 45 which is obsolete. ,,/. - VERSION 2 Base Realignment and Closure Q3RAC) Cleanup Plan Fort Ord Monterey, California Prepared for: Us. ARMY ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MARYLAND 21010 Prepared by: EARTH TECH 1420 KING STREET, SUITE 600 ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 Requestsfor this documentmustbe referredto: CommanderDLIFLCand POM Attn: ATZP-EP(GailYoungblood) Presidioof Monterey Monterey,California 93944-5006 (408)242-7924 DECEMBER 1995 M45.TOC “<e-’ .- ,J- This page intentionally left blank. 0445.RF’T Fort Oni, Cal~omia - December 1995 I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Section Page No. Executive Summary. .-. -.. .ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction andhnrnary.. ...--.......-----1-1 1.1 Environmental Response Objectives . - . .1-2 1.2 BCP Purpose, Updates, and Distribution . .1-3 1.3 BCT/Project Team . ---.......1-4 1.4 Installation Description and History . - . .1-4 1.4.1 General Property Description . ., . ...--......1-4 1.4.2 History of Installation . .1-6 1.5 EnvironmentalSetting . ..- ------1-11 1.5.1 Climate . ...1-11 1.5.2 Topography . --- . ...1-11 1.5.3 Geology . - . ...1-14 l.5.4Hydrogeology . ...1-14 1.5.5 Surface Water Hydrogeology . 1-15 1.6 Hazardous Substances and Waste Management Practices . 1-15 1.7 Off-Post Property/Tenants . 1-35 Chapter 2: Property Disposal and Reuse Plan.. ...2-1 2.1 Status of Disposal Planning Process . .2-1 2.1.1 NEPA and Endangered Species Act Disposal and Reuse Documentation . ...2-1 2.1.2 Reuse Plan . ..2-2 2.1.3 Disposal Plan . ...2-3 2.2 Relationship to Environmental Programs . .2-7 2.3 Property Transfer Methods ...,... ...2-9 2.3.1 Federal to Federal Transfer of Prope~ . .2-9 2.3.2 Public Benefit Conveyance . .. 2-10 2.3.3 Economic Development Conveyance . 2-10 2:3.4 Negotiated Sale . .. 2-10 2.3.5 Competitive Public Sale.... ...2-15 2.3.6 Widening of Public Highways . ...2-15 2.3.7 Donated Property . ...2-15 2.3.81nterim Leases . .. 2-15 Chapter 3: Installation-Wide Environmental program Status . .3-1 3.1 Environmental Restoration Program Status . .3-1 3.1.1 Preliminary Assessments and Site Investigations . .3-1 3.1.2 Remedial Investigation and Site Restoration Activities . .3-2 3.1.3 Installation-Wide Source Discovery and Assessment Status . 3-16 C445 RFT Fort Oral, Cal~omia - December 1995 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Section Page No. 3.2 Compliance Program Status . ..- . ..- . ..+-’ .””” ---’’3-17 3.2. i Storage Tanks . - . ..-. .’ 3-22 3.2.1 .lUSTS . - . - . ...3-22 3.2.1 .lASTS . -.....-......---3-24 3.2.2 Hazardous Substances Management . 3-25 3.2.3 Hazardous Waste Management . --- . ...3-26 3.2.4 Solid Waste Management . ...3-27 3.2.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls . -- . --- . ...3-27 3.2.6 Asbestos . -- . -- . ...3-29 3.2.7 Radon . - . - . ...3-29 3.2.8 RCW4 Facilities . ...-3-30 3.2.9 Wastewater Discharges . -.......-........-3-31 3.2.100 il/waterS eparators . .3-32 3.2.11pohtionP retention . - . ...3-32 3.2.12 Nuclear Regulato~ Commission (NRC) Licensing . 3-32 3.2.13 Mixed Waste . 3-33 3.2.14 Radiation . .. 3-33 3.2.15 NEPA . - . ----- . ...3-34 3.2.16 Lead-Based Paint . ..---3-34 3.2.17 Medical Waste . ..- . ...3-35 3.2.18 UXO . - . .--..3-36 3.2.19 Air Quality . ...3-38 3.3 Status of Natural and Cultural Resources Programs . 3-38 3.3.1 Vegetation . .. ~ . 3-39 3.3.2 Wildlife . ...3-40 3.3.3 Wetlands . ...3-41 3.3.4 Designated Preservation Areas . 3-41 3.3.5 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species . 3-42 3.3.6 Cultural Resources . .. 3-43 3.4 Environmental Condition of Property . 3-43 3.4.1 CERFA Parcels . 3-44 3.4.2 CERFA Parcels with Qualifiers . 3-44 3.4.3 CERFA Disqualified Parcels . ...3-65 3.4.4 CERFA Excluded Parcels . ...3-65 3.4.5 Suitability of Installation Property for Transfer by Deed . 3-65 3.5 Status of Community Involvement . 3-66 W5.R17 Fort Oral, Califomiu - December 1995 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued Section Page No. Chapter 4: Installation-wide Strategy for Environmental Restoration . .4-1 4.1 Zone/OU Designation and Site Characterization Strategy . .4-2 4.1.1 Zone Designations . ...-..........4-2 4.1.20U Designations . .4-2 4.1.3 Categorization of Sites for Basewide RI/FS . ...4-2 4.1.4 Remedy Selection Strategy . ...-..........4-3 4.1.5 Sequence of OUs/Sites . ...-4-8 4.2 . Compliance Strategy . --- . ...4-13 4.2.1 Storage Tanks . ...4-13 4.2.1 .lUSTS . ...4-16 4.2.1 .2 ASTS . -- . ...4-16 4.2,2 Hazardous Substances Management . 4-16 4.2.3 Hazardous Waste Management . ...4-16 4.2.4 Solid Waste Management . ...4-17 4.2.5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls . ...4-17 4.2.6 Asbestos . ...4-17 4.2.7 Radon . ...4-17 4,2.8 RCRA Facilities . ...4-17 4.2.9 Wastewater Discharges . ..4-18 4.2.10 Oil/Water Separators . ...4-18 4.2.11 Pollution Prevention . ...4-18 4.2.12 NRC Licensing . 4-18 4.2.13 Mixed Waste . 4-19 4.2.14 Radiation . 4-19 4.2.15 NEPA . 4-19 4.2.16 Lead-Based Paint . 4-19 4.2.17 Medical Waste . 4-20 4.2.18 Uxo . 4-20 4.2.19 Air Quality . 4-21 4.3 Natural and Cultural Resources Strategy (ies) . .4-21 4.3.1 Vegetation . 4-21 4.3.2 Wildlife . 4-21 4.3.3 Wetlands . 4-21 4.3.4 Designated Preservation Areas . , . 4-22 4.3.5 Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species . 4-22 4.3.6 Cultural Resources . 4-22 4.4 Community Involvement./Strategy . .4-22 ... W5.R~ Fort Oral, Cal@mia -December 1995 111 -., I TABLE OF CONTENTS I I Continued Section Page No. Chapter 5: Environmental Program Master Schedules . , . .5-1 5.1 Environmental Restoration Program . .5-1 5.1.1 Respome Schedules . ...5-1 5.1.2 Requirements by Fiscal Yem . ...-........5-1 5.2 Compliance Programs . --.......+..’”..””””” “--5-1 5.2.1 Master Compliance Schedules . .5-1 5.2.2 Requirements by Fiscal Year..... ...5-9 5.3 Natural and Cultural Resources . ..” .5-9 5.3.1 Natural and Cultural Resources Schedule(s) . ...---....5-9 5.3.2 Requirements by Fiscal Yeu . ...--..........5-9 5.4 Meeting Schedule . ...--5-9 Chapter 6: Technical and Other Issues to be Resolved . .6-1 6.1 Information Management . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • * Fewer Than 11 Applicants Attorneys Admitted in Other Jurisdictions Less
    GENERAL STATISTICS REPORT JULY 2018 CALIFORNIA BAR EXAMINATION OVERALL STATISTICS FOR CATEGORIES WITH MORE THAN 11 APPLICANTS WHO COMPLETED THE EXAMINATION First-Timers Repeaters All Takers Applicant Group Took Pass %Pass Took Pass %Pass Took Pass %Pass General Bar Examination 5132 2816 54.9 2939 468 15.9 8071 3284 40.7 Attorneys’ Examination 297 121 40.7 225 48 21.3 522 169 32.4 Total 5429 2937 54.1 3164 516 16.3 8593 3453 40.2 DISCIPLINED ATTORNEYS EXAMINATION STATISTICS Took Pass %Pass CA Disciplined Attorneys 19 1 5.3 GENERAL BAR EXAMINATION STATISTICS First-Timers Repeaters All Takers Law School Type Took Pass %Pass Took Pass %Pass Took Pass %Pass CA ABA Approved 3099 1978 63.8 1049 235 22.4 4148 2213 53.4 Out-of-State ABA 924 538 58.2 417 52 12.5 1341 590 44.0 CA Accredited 233 38 16.3 544 51 9.4 777 89 11.5 CA Unaccredited 66 10 15.2 259 22 8.5 325 32 9.8 Law Office/Judges’ Chambers * * * Foreign Educated/JD Equivalent 149 28 18.8 171 24 14.0 320 52 16.3 + One Year US Education US Attorneys Taking the 295 172 58.3 130 44 33.8 425 216 50.8 General Bar Exam1 Foreign Attorneys Taking the 352 46 13.1 309 38 12.3 661 84 12.7 General Bar Exam2 3 4-Year Qualification * 30 0 0.0 36 1 2.8 Schools No Longer in Operation * 26 1 3.8 32 4 12.5 * Fewer than 11 Applicants 1 Attorneys admitted in other jurisdictions less than four years must take and those admitted four or more years may elect to take the General Bar Examination.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oregon School of Law 2,315,690 Brigham Young
    Rank Law School Score 1 University of Oregon School of Law 2,315,690 2 Brigham Young University School of Law 1,779,018 3 University of Illinois College of Law 1,333,703 4 DePaul University College of Law 976,055 5 University of Utah College of Law 842,671 6 Suffolk University Law School 700,616 St. Mary's University of San Antonio School 564,703 7 of Law 8 Northern Illinois University College of Law 537,518 9 University of Michigan Law School 500,086 10 College of William & Mary 431,510 LexisNexis Think Like A Lawyer Case Law Game Exampionship Leaderboard NOTE: Rankings are based on the cumulative Think Like A Lawyer Game scores for each school, which is a combination of the top scores of all students from each school. Page 1 of 5 11 Charlotte School of Law 404,331 12 University of Nevada Las Vegas - William S. Boyd School of Law 356,763 13 Lewis and Clark Law School 342,146 14 Gonzaga University School of Law 300,753 15 University of Houston Law Center 297,125 16 South Texas College of Law 293,509 17 University of South Carolina Law Center 284,762 18 Howard University School of Law 278,628 19 Michigan State University School of Law 266,731 20 Washington University School of Law 243,097 21 Willamette University College of Law 239,586 22 Texas Southern University 223,523 23 Tulane University Law School 200,823 24 Barry University School of Law 200,428 25 St. Thomas University School of Law 193,744 26 University of Miami School of Law 191,251 27 University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law 187,862 28 Northeastern University School
    [Show full text]
  • California State Parks
    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2017 VIA EMAIL and PERSONAL DELIVERY the Honorable Tani G. Canti
    September 11, 2017 VIA EMAIL AND PERSONAL DELIVERY The Honorable Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Chief Justice and Associate Justices SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA 350 McAllister Street Room 1295 San Francisco, California 94902-4797 RE: The California Bar Exam – Adjustment to the Minimum Passing Score Dear Chief Justice and Associate Justices: The undersigned Deans of the California Accredited Law Schools (CALS) request leave to file this Letter Brief to ask the Court to exercise its inherent power to admit persons to practice law in California and to adjust the minimum passing score (cut score) of the California bar exam.1 Following comprehensive study and analysis of minimum competence, the CALS join with many other stakeholders and experts, including the State Bar of California, in supporting a change in the minimum passing score of the California Bar Exam to 1390, as the one score that represents the intersection of research data, norms, current practice, and policy. The CALS previously petitioned the Court on March 2, 2017 to request an adjustment to the minimum passing score from 1440 to 1350.2 In response, the Court expressed its concern that it “lacks a fully developed analysis with supporting evidence from which to conclude that 1440 or another cut score would be most appropriate for admission to the bar in California.”3 The Court directed the State Bar of California (State Bar) to conduct “a thorough and expedited investigation” that includes “a meaningful analysis of the current pass rate and information sufficient to determine whether protection of potential clients and the public is served by maintaining the current cut score.”4 1 California Rules of Court, Rules 9.3(a) and 9.6(a), as amended and effective on January 1, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey Elkhorn Slough Reserve 156 101 Zmudowski State Beach Moss Landing State Wildlife Area
    1 SANTA CRUZ BEACH BOARDWALK MANRESA STATE BEACH ELLICOTT SLOUGH NATIONAL WILDLLIFE REFUGE BEGIN YOUR UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE IN WATSONVILLE STATE WILDLIFE AREA PAJARO VALLEY GOLF CLUB 1 MONTEREY ELKHORN SLOUGH RESERVE 156 101 ZMUDOWSKI STATE BEACH MOSS LANDING STATE WILDLIFE AREA MANZANITA COUNTY PARK BAY 1 SALINAS RIVER STATE BEACH HOLLISTER HILLS STATE VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA Monterey Bay is centrally located on the coast of 156 101 California, just two hours south of San Francisco, MONTEREY BAY with Los Angeles and San Diego in easy reach. The SALINAS RIVER NATIONAL bay itself, one of the world’s largest marine-protected WILDLIFE REFUGE 05 1 areas, is home to whales, deep sea anglerfish, and, NORTHRIDGE MALL of course, the CSUMB mascot, the sea otter. The MARINA STATE BEACH VISUAL AND PUBLIC CSUMB campus is near pristine beaches, redwood ART CENTER CALILFORNIA COASTAL NATIONAL MONUMENT forests, mountain ranges, tide pools, fertile valleys, ONCAMPUS large expanses of farmland, and the Fort Ord IN N OUT BURGER STUDENT 01 DINING CENTER National Monument. POINT PINOS FORT ORD BEACH 101 COMMONS LIGHTHOUSE The CSUMB campus sits halfway between the 01 LOVERS POINT ONCAMPUS Monterey Peninsula, which features the coastal 02 PARK CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY ON MONTEREY BAY G17 CAMPUS Cal State SAND CITY OTTER CHAPMAN SCIENCE communities of Pacific Grove, Monterey (California’s 08 MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM HERON Monterey Bay at CSUMB HALL EXPRESS ACADEMIC CENTER PACIFIC GROVE MUSEUM 04 68 first capital), Seaside, Carmel, and the Salinas Valley, OF NATURAL HISTORY FISHERMAN'S WHARF BENIHANA RESTAURANT 06 MONTEREY ZOO which is known as the “Salad Bowl of the World” for G17 101 DEL MONTE DUNES its abundant agricultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 184 / Friday, September 20, 1996 / Notices 49455
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 184 / Friday, September 20, 1996 / Notices 49455 Name Case No. Waite, Schneider, Bayless, & Chesley Co., L.P.A ........................................................................................................................... VFA±0077 [FR Doc. 96±24126 Filed 9±19±96; 8:45 am] PA, Due: October 21, 1996, Contact: Summary: EPA expressed BILLING CODE 6450±01±P Manuel A. Marks (717) 787±2222. environmental concerns due to a lack of EIS No. 960432, Final Supplement, mitigation to offset or reduce potential GSA, WA, Pacific Highway Port of Entry adverse impacts and a lack of pollution ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (POE) Facility Expansion, Updated prevention features in the DEIS. EPA AGENCY Information, Construction of WA±543 in recommended that the FEIS contain Blaine, near the United States/Canada commitments to implement water [ER±FRL±5473±2] Border in Blaine, Whatcom County, conservation, hazardous waste WA, Due: October 21, 1996, Contact: minimization and solid waste recycling. Environmental Impact Statements; ERP No. D±FHW±E40770±FLÐRating Notice of Availability Donna Meyer (206) 931±7675. EIS No. 960433, Final EIS, FHW, OH, EC2, Port of Miami Tunnel and Access Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Putnam Street Bridge Replacement Improvements, from I±395 via Activities, General Information (202) across the Muskingum River, MacArthur Causeway Bridge, Dade 564±7167 OR (202) 564±7153. Construction and Funding, Marietta, County, FL. Weekly receipt of Environmental Washington County, OH, Due: October Summary: EPA's review found that Impact Statements Filed September 09, 21, 1996, Contact: William Jones (614) sediment resuspension during tunnel 1996 Through September 13, 1996 469±5877. dredging activities could degrade water Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 157 TITLE 54—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and RELATED PROGRAMS § 320301 Able to the Secretary to Carry out Subsection (F) Or (G
    Page 157 TITLE 54—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AND RELATED PROGRAMS § 320301 able to the Secretary to carry out subsection (f) NATIONAL MONUMENTS ESTABLISHED UNDER or (g) of section 320102 of this title may be obli- PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION gated or expended— Ackia Battleground National Monument, Mississippi (1) unless the appropriation of the funds has [see section 450r of Title 16, Conservation].—Proc. been specifically authorized by law enacted on No. 2307, Oct. 25, 1938, 53 Stat. 2494. or after October 30, 1992; or Admiralty Island National Monument, Alaska [Monu- (2) in excess of the amount prescribed by law ment established within Tongass National Forest by enacted on or after October 30, 1992. Pub. L. 96–487, title V, § 503(b), Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2399; Pub. L. 104–123, Apr. 1, 1996, 110 Stat. 879; Pub. (Pub. L. 113–287, § 3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3259.) L. 105–60, Oct. 10, 1997, 111 Stat. 1269].—Proc. No. 4611, Dec. 1, 1978, 93 Stat. 1446. HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES African Burial Ground National Monument, New York.—Proc. No. 7984, Feb. 27, 2006, 71 F.R. 10793. Revised Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) Section Agua Fria National Monument, Arizona.—Proc. No. 7263, Jan. 11, 2000, 65 F.R. 2817. 320106 ......... 16 U.S.C. 466(a). Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, § 6(a), 49 Stat. 668; Pub. L. Andrew Johnson National Monument, Tennessee 102–575, title XL, § 4023, [Monument redesignated Andrew Johnson National Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4768. Historical Site, see section 450o of Title 16, Con- servation].—Proc.
    [Show full text]
  • Affiliated Colleges and Universities
    Affiliated Colleges and Universities Academy of Art University, San Francisco Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law Azusa Pacific University Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science Bakersfield College Citrus College Berkeley City College City College of San Francisco Brigham Young University, Idaho City University of Seattle Butte College Claremont Graduate University Cabrillo College Claremont McKenna College Cal Northern School of Law Clovis Community College California Baptist University College of San Mateo California Institute for Integral Studies College of the Canyons California Lutheran University College of the Redwoods California Northern School of Law The Colleges of Law – Santa Barbara and Ventura California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Concordia University California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Contra Costa College California State University Crafton Hills College Bakersfield Cuesta College California Maritime Academy Cuyamaca College Channel Islands Cypress College Chico De Anza College Dominguez Hills DeVry University East Bay Diablo Valley College Fresno Dominican University of California Fullerton Drexel University Humboldt Duke University Long Beach El Camino College Los Angeles Empire College Monterey Bay Feather River College Northridge Foothill College Sacramento Fresno City College San Bernardino Fresno Pacific University San Diego Fullerton College San Francisco Gavilan College San Jose George Fox University San Marcos George Mason University Sonoma Georgia Institute of Technology Stanislaus Glendale Community College California Western School of Law Glendale University College of Law Carnegie Mellon University Golden Gate University, San Francisco Cerritos College Golden Gate University School of Law Chabot College Grand Canyon University Chaffey College Grossmont College Chapman University Hartnell College Note: This list is updated frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • ·|}Þ183 40 R Le D 17-Mi
    40 0 2,500 Feet Del Monte Forest Non - Coastal - Detail ·|}þ183 40 R LE D 17-MI LAPIS RD C O 40 N G R E SH S PACIFIC GROVE I B S AN A P S Y R D R NASHUA RD D 40 DEL MONTE BLVD 17-MILE DR ·|}þ68 DAVID AVE 40 40 SLOAT RD OCEAN RD MONTEREY 40 ¤£101 MC FADDEN RD GMP-1.9 ST Legend for Del Monte Forest Coastal Zone Bondary Parcel Æ` COOPER RD City Limits MARINA ARMSTRONG RD y Residential BLANCO RD RESIDENTIAL 2 Units/Acre RESERVATION RD Marina Municipal Forest Lake a Airport STEVENSON DR RESIDENTIAL 2.4 Units/Acre 1 Greater Salinas BIRD ROCK RD ·|}þ RESIDENTIAL 4 Units/Acre B Resource Conservation S a y l Resource Conservation 10 Ac Min in a s R SALINAS i Land use within the Coastal Zone is Open Space Forest e v e r addressed in the Del Monte Forest LUP. Open Space Recreation r IMJIN RD Urban Reserve e HITCHCOCK RD t n o Fort Ord Dunes State Park INTERGARRISON RD M 1ST ST HITCHCOCK RD DAVIS RD n GIGLING RD a 0 2,000 Feet Pasadera - Detail FOSTER RD e See the Fort Ord Master Plan for this area, Fig LU6a. c LIGHTHOUSE AVE SOUTH BOUNDARY RD 2.5 2.76 YORK RD EUCALYPTUS RD ERA DR SAD O GENERAL JIM MOORE BLV A SPRECKELS BLVD ESTRELLA AVE P 2.76 68 c SAND CITY SEASIDE YORK RD 2.76 ·|}þ PACIFIC GROVE Laguna Seca Recreation Area R IVER RD i .76 .76 10 f DAVID AVE i 5.1 68 5.1 10 ·|}þ 10 c BIT RD 5.1 Del Monte Forest See Detail 5.1 a DEL MONTE AVE P ·|}þ218 FREMONT ST FREMONT ST See Fort Ord Master Plan for this area, Fig LU6a.
    [Show full text]
  • National Conservation Lands
    ^ BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) system of National Conservation Lands includes approximately 36 million acres of nationally significant landscapes with outstanding historic, cultural, ecological, and The Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument in central scientific values. Congress and presidents have Montana protects a historic landscape that is tremendously popular for outdoor recreation. The monument includes key provided specific designations to these lands segments of the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail and the to conserve, protect, and restore them for the Nez Perce National Historic Trail, as well as the Fort Benton National Historic Landmark. benefit of current and future generations. PHOTO BY BOB WICK/BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT National Conservation Lands The National Conservation Lands FY 2021 Appropriations Request system include BLM lands with the following congressional and presidential Please support $49.5 million for the Bureau of Land designations: Management’s National Conservation Lands in the FY 2021 • National Monuments Interior Appropriations bill. • National Historic Trails • National Scenic Trails • Wild and Scenic Rivers APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies • Wilderness Areas AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management • Wilderness Study Areas ACCOUNT: Management of Lands and Resources • National Conservation Areas ACTIVITY: National Landscape Conservation System (National • Additional areas designated by Conservation Lands)
    [Show full text]
  • FORT ORD PANORAMA Vol
    FORT ORD PANORAMA Vol. 31 FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA, FRIDAY, APRIL 30,1971 No. 29 I940-I97I Soldiers allowed to recruit in hometowns Currently underway at Ft. Ord is a new program which will give soldiers who have just graduated from the 16 week infantry training school the opportunity to assist the recruiter in enlisting people in their home town. Under the Hometown Recruiter Assistant Plan, young soldiers will work closely with experienced recruiters in an attempt to person­ alize recruiting efforts. The innovative program is still in its early stages at Ft. Ord, but the basic objective of the program is to get outstanding graduates of infan- ——————————————:———— try training to assist the recruiter sistant has done well, the assis- in their home town. tant can be assigned to an addi- Similar programs are also in ^fi *4 feV^P01^ duj[' effect at Ft. Knox, Ft. Jackson, Af,er the T^ Sf C,°m?i 5 i7i. T> 11 j T-J. T • soldier can still take the leave Ft. Polk and Ft. Lewis. „ . ... , normally given training gradu- Personnel are chosen offer go- ates before they report to their ing through a number of inter- duty stations. _~ „_ „_..._ _ . f , ,* /-iii j views and boards. After screen- GLAD TO BE DONE — Privates Sydney Gee, Charles Jensen, and '.,,.. Eric Chilson, all of A-l-3, are the first soldiers to shorten their stay '"9; *• applicant appears in the new 16 week training cycle. All three graduated two weeks before a local board held by early from the first half of the 16 week long training, and today AG Trainee Section.
    [Show full text]