DOCSLIB.ORG

Voluminous Anti-Bruce Rauner Mailing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voluminous Anti-Bruce Rauner Mailing In USA Today: VOTE REPUBLICAN: Don't Vote Rauner... n Bill Brady Bruce Rauner ...Vote Republican! n Kirk Dillard "I'm a Social Liberal" n Dan Rutherford Bruce Rauner The Taxpayer’s Voice February 2014 “Shake up Springfield?” No. Follow the Money… The Rauner record shows it’s… When you see more of the never ending Rauner TV and … SHAKE DOWN Springfield Internet ads, ask yourself— where is the money coming from or several months, Bruce Rauner has spent millions saturating the airwaves with ads. to pay for them? You’ve seen him with the snow globe saying he is going to “shake up Springfield.” FYou’ve seen him carrying a sledgehammer. You’ve seen him talk about reform, term With no other political ads on the air, Rauner has been limits, and taking on special interests. spending millions of dollars in shameless overkill. He’s been quoted that he will spend “whatever it takes to win,” which But do you really know Bruce Rauner? means he believes your vote is for sale. That cocky attitude Slick ads based on “shaking up Springfield” and other vague slogans don’t tell you much is the opposite of his “everyman” act. about a person. Everyone is for “economic growth,” “lower spending” and “better schools.” Rauner says he has a secret plan for the economy and taxes, but he has to focus Bruce Rauner can afford to spend tens of millions of dollars on winning the election first before he can let us know the specifics. He is asking us to buy after making millions upon millions managing state pension a pig in a poke. Why doesn’t he share the details of his plans BEFORE the election? funds. See the article on DNC Chairman Ed Rendell. Rauner donated $300,000 to Rendell’s campaign for Governor of Knowing Rauner’s record helps interpret what those synthetic campaign slogans really mean. Pennsylvania against a Republican— helping hand the Democrats a big state Bruce Rauner isn’t going to “shake up governorship. Springfield” — based on his record he is going to “Shake Down Springfield.” He’s an expert When Rendell won, Rauner’s pension at doing just that. business in Pennsylvania doubled, When you see him on television with that snow resulting in millions of dollars in globe shaking Springfield, he is really additional profits. demonstrating how he shook down the Illinois Here in Illinois, Rauner has made millions off the Illinois pension system by employing a shady dealer, Stu Levine at $25,000 per month, to get 50 million Teachers’ Retirement System and the Illinois State Board of dollars in Illinois pension business. Former Investment. Governor Jim Edgar expressed concern about Furthermore, Rauner has raised millions of dollars from this on a WLS radio show on June 6, 2013. contributors who are strong Democrats and before they On January 14, 2011, The Philadelphia Enquirer newspaper cited another outrageous contributed to Bruce Rauner—had ONLY donated to example of Rauner’s pay to play on steroids . The Chairman of the Democrat National Democrats and pro-abortion PACs. Committee (DNC) Ed Rendell was running for Pennsylvania Governor. The fact is Bruce Continued on page 2 Rauner’s firm had pension business with the Pennsylvania Commonwealth. Despite that conflict of interest, Bruce Rauner gave Rendell a whopping $300,000 for Rendell’s race against the Republican nominee for Governor. Rendell won. Rauner’s pension business with Pennsylvania surged in Rendell’s first year in office. Rauner made a quick FOUR MILLION DOLLARS profit from that expanded business in Pennsylvania. Perhaps that is a mere coincidence, but if not, it is an extraordinary rate of return on investment. Questioned about the scandal, Rauner said he wanted to buy influence with Bruce Rauner was caught the chairman of the DNC because he “shaking up” not Springfield, was an education reformer. First, that but his own positions on the statement about “buying influence” makes Rauner’s campaign about ending minimum wage. special interest influence in Springfield a joke and hypocritical. Second, Rendell was against charter schools and school choice as Governor. So the contribution was—as Rauner stated—to buy influence. But was it influence for school reform, or for a vastly expanded pension business? You decide. Now when you hear Rauner talking about “shaking up Springfield” you will have a new appreciation for why many believe that really means “shaking down Springfield.” Worse yet, Rendell only beat the Republican by a small margin. The Governors before AND after Rendell were both Republicans. Bruce Rauner gave a major boost to the former chairman of the DNC allowing Democrats to take over the Pennsylvania Governorship. But that’s not surprising, here in Illinois Bruce Rauner voted Democrat in the 2006 primary, yet now seeks the Republican nomination for Governor. Continued on page 5 Avoid Buyer's Remorse — Learn About Bruce Rauner NOW . pretenders 1988 Democratic Presidential Candidate Bruce Rauner as “everyman” Michael Dukakis a.k.a. Baron von Carhartt $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Follow the Money Continued from page 1 Many of these Democrats donating to Rauner are Republican credentials and sustained commitment from Rauner in return if he wins. On the other also from OUT OF STATE . He has received to the cause. hand, an outside effort to educate voters by contributions from non-Republicans in at least 36 disseminating facts doesn’t begin to compare— Rauner seems to have a self-anointed entitlement states. Why? What causes them to care who gets to the Republican nomination for Governor. He there can be no quid pro quo. elected as the Governor of Illinois? seems to believe he can spend millions of dollars In the primary, Bill Brady, Kirk Dillard and Dan Rauner is now hypocritically howling over the “educating” Republican voters, but that no one Rutherford are raising their money from audacity of others coming together to oppose else has that same right. He might be able to be a Republicans, not giant chunks from IL Democrats him by broadcasting the facts Bruce Rauner dictator to people who work for him, but he’s not and limousine liberals all over the nation. doesn’t want you to know. In America, the First going to get away with it in this primary. Bruce Rauner's massive campaign contributions to Amendment right of freedom of speech and Rauner, who has donated over $870,000 to Democrats is appalling. Besides hundreds of freedom of association covers everyone —not Democrats around the country and voted in the thousands of dollars to Rahm Emanuel, Rich Daley just billionaires. 2006 Democrat primary, now whining about and Ed Rendell, Rauner has donated to Senator For the last six months Rauner has “unions” out to “hijack” the Republican Max Baucus of Montana—the “architect” of enjoyed being the bully who primary is pretty rich. Obamacare . In 2008, Rauner donated $4,600 to thought he owned the political Rauner is the one who has donated and received left-wing radical Congressman Ed Markey from . He’s given $40,000 directly to the arena and is now shocked that hundreds of thousands of dollars to and from Massachusetts DNC and $25,000 to the Democrat Campaign anyone has dared to stand up to Democrats all over the country. Rauner is the Congressional Committee. As DCCC Chairman, him. You see that wasn’t in the one who is a very close friend of Chicago Rahm Emanuel chaired and orchestrated the PLAN he bought from his out of Mayor Rahm Emanuel and made Emanuel a takeover of the House by Democrats in 2006 state political consultants. Rauner’s multi-millionaire, thereby enabling Emanuel to resulting in Nancy Pelosi becoming Speaker. money was supposed to drown out all get back into politics. Rauner is the one who Rauner has even donated to Dick Durbin! opposition in the primary. Rutherford, contributed $200,000 to Chicago Democrat Brady and Dillard were all supposed to be machine boss Rich Daley’s campaigns for mayor. After all that, Rauner has the gall to protest the politically dead by now. Rauner is the one who voted “hijacking” of the Republican nomination for Yet the opposite has occurred—they are all in the Democrat primary in Governor when it’s been him plotting the hijacking showing increasing vitality. If the polls weren’t 2006. Rauner is the one who all along. turning, Rauner would not have suddenly joined helped Dick Durbin. This effort is about stopping a several debates in which he had previously refused So when Bruce Rauner is pretender from buying the Republican to participate. If he didn’t feel what he thought was finally being exposed, those Party in Illinois by spreading the truth. certain victory slipping away, he wouldn’t be perceived “attacks” will be against the acting like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum What does Rauner expect for his least Republican of the four candidates gigantic contributions to Democrats, because this race is suddenly not being conducted in this primary—Rauner. on his terms alone. The battlefield is now being and what do so many Democrats who leveled to an extent. One such Democrat contributor to have donated to his campaign expect Rauner is Glen Tullman's $255,300. from him? Rauner is going to have to actually compete in Tullman is from Libertyville, IL and has a long list the public arena by putting his cynically Are we really supposed to believe that hundreds of political donations to ONLY liberal Democrats of liberal Democrats had a change of heart and concocted “everyman” image up against the and is another of Rahm Emanuel’s friends. TRUTH that is now being spread far and wide.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 DePue: Today is Monday, December 7, 2009. My name is Mark DePue; I’m the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. I’m here this afternoon with Eugene Reineke, but you mentioned usually you’re known as Gene. Reineke: That’s correct, Mark. DePue: Why don’t you tell us where we are. Reineke: We’re here at my current employer, which is Hill & Knowlton, Inc. It’s a public relations firm, and we’re located at the Merchandise Mart in downtown Chicago. DePue: Which has a fascinating history itself. Someday I’ll have to delve into that one. We’re obviously here to talk about your experiences in the Edgar administration, but you had a lot of years working with Jim Thompson as well, so we’re going to take quite a bit of time. In today’s session, I don’t know that we’ll get to much of the Edgar experience because you’ve got enough information to talk about before that time, which is valuable history for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.26 Interview # 26: December 14, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.26 Interview # 26: December 14, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue DePue: The next person I wanted to ask you about is President Barack Obama. We had talked about him before, but it was always in the context of these other decisions that you were making or with the Blagojevich situation. What do you think about his emergence as a politician? Edgar: Oh, it’s phenomenal. I mean, here’s a guy that’s a state senator, and all of a sudden he’s president (laughs) of the United States within a matter of, what, a little more than two years. That’s a phenomenal accomplishment. DePue: Did he have a prominent role, as you recall, in the Illinois Senate? Edgar: No, no. When I was there, he was a freshman member, and he was in the minority party, so that’s about as insignificant as you could be. I think he was elected in ’96, so the last two years I was governor, he was in the state Senate. But I remember early in that session after the election, my staff person who was working the Senate came to me and said, “Boy, there’s really a bright new African American in the Senate. He is really impressive.” I was rather dubious. I had heard that before. As I often said, when I was a young person, we thought Jesse Jackson was really special; then I think most of us decided that wasn’t true. So I was a little… They make good speeches; sometimes they don’t follow up.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn Vs Rauner John S
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC The imonS Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Simon Public Policy Institute) 1-2015 The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner John S. Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers Paper #40 of the Simon Review Recommended Citation Jackson, John S., "The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner" (2015). The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute). Paper 40. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute) by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Simon Review The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs. Rauner By: John S. Jackson Paper #40 January 2015 A Publication of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Southern Illinois University Carbondale Author’s Note: I want to thank Cary Day, Jacob Trammel and Roy E. Miller for their valuable assistance on this project. THE SIMON REVIEW The Simon Review papers are occasional nonacademic papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale that examine and explore public policy issues within the scope of the Institute’s mission and in the tradition of the University. The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute acts on significant and controversial issues impacting the region, the state, the nation, and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 30 Issue 2 Article 2 December 2012 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Warden Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Rob Warden, How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty, 30(2) LAW & INEQ. 245 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol30/iss2/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 245 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Wardent Introduction The late J. Paul Getty had a formula for becoming wealthy: rise early, work late-and strike oil.' That is also the formula for abolishing the death penalty, or at least it is a formula-the one that worked in Illinois. When Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation ending capital punishment in Illinois on March 9, 2011, he tacitly acknowledged the early rising and late working that preceded the occasion. "Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it." 2 The experience to which the governor referred was not something that dropped like a gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath and seeped into his consciousness by osmosis. Rather, a cadre of public defenders, pro bono lawyers, journalists, academics, and assorted activists, devoted tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of hours, over more than three decades, to the abolition movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Is Not Without Its Advantages
    Sex is not without its advantages Now that the baseball season in town is effectively over, cook up a good local sex scandal or two to divert attention away from these far more serious issues. July 25, 2013 By Allen R. Sanderson As Chicago's homicide rate and Illinois' pension crisis continue to garner national media attention and spiral out of control, our city and state politicians are Nero-like in their responses. We need some bold action, or at least diversion, and soon, or we risk sinking even lower on the political radar screen — we are only fifth in state population and thanks to Toronto, we are now the fifth-largest city in North America. The "flyover" section of our country has a lot to learn from the coasts — and even abroad. Thus I offer this humble suggestion: Now that the baseball season in town is effectively over, cook up a good local sex scandal or two to divert attention away from these far more serious issues. I'm not asking for an Anthony Weiner on any given day. And not even a John Edwards. But can't we at least produce in this city and state someone on the order of Eliot Spitzer or Silvio Berlusconi? I'd even settle for Mark Sanford or David Vitter. Sure, we have had more than our fair share of high-profile felons — former Govs. Rod Blagojevich, George Ryan, Dan Walker, Otto Kerner. But for what? Corruption, racketeering, bribery, fraud. Boring stuff. Where were the sexting emails, prostitutes, strippers, mistresses, photos of a blue dress or the Appalachian Trail? Our about-one-scandal-per-year Chicago aldermen have gotten their three squares a day at the public trough for the mundane: corruption, bribery, tax evasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Brady Kirk Dillard Tio Hardimann Bruce Rauner Dan Rutherford Pat
    Bill Brady Kirk Dillard Tio Hardimann Bloomington Hinsdale Hillside AGE: 52 AGE: 58 AGE: 51 JOBS/EXPERIENCE: Small JOBS/EXPERIENCE: State senator JOBS/EXPERIENCE: Activist, speaker, businessman, state senator and attorney. Chief of staff to former former head of CeaseFire Chicago OFFICES HELD: State representative, Gov. Jim Edgar, director of legislative OFFICES HELD: First time seeking state senator affairs for former Gov. Jim Thompson public office EDUCATION: Illinois Wesleyan OFFICES HELD: State senator EDUCATION: Associate degree from University, Bachelor of Science, 1983, EDUCATION: WIU, 1977, Bachelor of Harold Washington College and bachelor economics finance and political science Arts in political science and economics and master degrees from Northeastern FAMILY: Married, three adult children with honors; Juris Doctor degree from Illinois University in Chicago RUNNING MATE: Maria Rodriguez, DePaul University Law School in 1982 FAMILY: Married, four children former Long Grove village president, FAMILY: Married, two daughters and two stepchildren trustee and clerk RUNNING MATE: State Rep. RUNNING MATE: Attorney Jil Tracy, former assistant Illinois Brunell Donald attorney general Bruce Rauner Dan Rutherford Pat Quinn Winnetka Chenoa Chicago AGE: 58 AGE: 55 Age: 65 JOBS/EXPERIENCE: Chairman, JOBS/EXPERIENCE: Illinois state JOBS/EXPERIENCE: Illinois governor R8 Capital (current). Chairman, GTCR treasurer. ServiceMaster Co., Vice OFFICES HELD: Former lieutenant (retired in 2012) President International governor and state treasurer OFFICES
    [Show full text]
  • April 2010 Unionthe Official Publicationteacher of the Chicago Teachers Union
    The Inside Stories... Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 12 Page 16 Volume 73 Number 6 April 2010 UNIONThe Official PublicationTEACHER of the Chicago Teachers Union Arbitration win ‘a great victory’ for teachers By John A. Ostenburg, Stewart’s interpretation of the in appropriate positions in the parties’ current collective Editor Emeritus contractual agreement between order to determine any “actual bargaining agreement.” the CTU and the Chicago Board (financial) harm” done to any Arbitrator Meyers further he Chicago Teachers of Education. of them. notes that, “[Ms.] Stewart Union has scored a According to the arbitration President Stewart was one testified that at the very end of major victory on behalf decision, the Chicago Public of four CTU representatives those negotiations, one of the of displaced teachers Schools officials were ordered who testified in the arbitration main issues that the Union was in the Chicago Public to “immediately cease and de- hearings. In his summary ruling, trying to resolve was the very TSchools. The victory also pro- sist from imposing any ‘aging’ Arbitrator Meyers states that issue presented here. [Ms.] tects any teachers who will be or waiting period to the process “[Ms.] Stewart was the Union’s Stewart stated that the Union displaced in the future. of filling vacancies” from the chief negotiator during the repeatedly raised the issue of Peter R. Meyers, an indepen- reassignment pool. negotiations that culminated in (Continued on page 4) dent arbitrator, recently issued He also ruled that the Union a ruling that clarifies the rights and CPS have 90 days dur- displaced teachers in the reas- ing which they must review the 5 CTU officers, staff and members sat down for dinner with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Kirk Dillard # ISG-A-L-2009-030.01 Interview # 1: September 29, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Kirk Dillard # ISG-A-L-2009-030.01 Interview # 1: September 29, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee, and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Tuesday, September 29, 2009. My name is Mark DePue. I’m the Director of Oral History at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. It’s my privilege today to be sitting across the table from Sen. Kirk Dillard. Good afternoon, Senator. Dillard: Good afternoon, Mark. It’s good to see you again. DePue: I want to thank you at the very beginning of this for taking the time out of your busy schedule; and just to let the listening public know, in however many years they might be encountering this, you’re at the beginning stages of running for governor of the state of Illinois yourself.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.11 Interview # 11: November 17, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    An Interview with Governor Jim Edgar Volume III (Sessions 11-16) Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.11 Interview # 11: November 17, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 DePue: Today is Tuesday, November 17, 2009. My name is Mark DePue, the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, and we are in with another session with Gov. Jim Edgar. Good morning, Governor. Edgar: Good morning. DePue: We’ve had quite a few of these, and it’s been quite a while since our last one, when we talked about the 1990 election. And there were a couple things I know you wanted to say about the 1990 election, but let’s start with this question: what was it about that election, do you think looking back at it now, that made the difference for you and your campaign? Edgar: First of all, I don’t think I should have won that election. People wanted a change. We had had a Republican administration for fourteen years. His [Gov. Jim Thompson] numbers weren’t real good at that point, and I was tied to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Kirk Brown # ISG-A-L-2009-044 Interview # 1: December 22, 2009 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki
    Interview with Kirk Brown # ISG-A-L-2009-044 Interview # 1: December 22, 2009 Interviewer: Mike Czaplicki COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee, and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. Czaplicki: Good morning. Today is Tuesday, December 22, 2009. My name’s Mike Czaplicki. I work for the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum, and I’m here in Springfield today with Kirk Brown, who was Secretary of the Illinois Department of Transportation under Governors Edgar and Ryan. He’s been generous enough to sit down today and talk with us about his life and his service in the Edgar administration. So welcome, Kirk. Brown: Glad to be here. Czaplicki: All right, we may as well begin at the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Debate Transcription Word Template File
    STATE OF ILLINOIS 99th GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGULAR SESSION SENATE TRANSCRIPT 112th Legislative Day 5/11/2016 HB0694 Third Reading 65 HB1288 Recalled 67 HB1288 Third Reading 68 HB4462 Third Reading 69 HB5598 Motion 53 SB0386 Recalled 8 SB2321 Recalled 9 SB2321 Third Reading 10 SB2321 Vote Intention 12 SB2571 Third Reading 13 SB2931 Third Reading 14 SB2931 Vote Intention 51 SB2931 Vote Intention 51 SB2931 Vote Intention 52 SB2933 Third Reading 53 SB2961 Second Reading 4 SB3426 First Reading 2 SR1716 Adopted 26 SR1855 Resolution Offered 2 SR1856 Resolution Offered 2 SR1857 Adopted 28 SR1857 Resolution Offered 2 SR1858 Resolution Offered 72 AM990477 Motion 52 Senate to Order-Senator Sullivan 1 Prayer-Lieutenant Colonel Charles Smith 1 Pledge of Allegiance 1 Journal-Postponed 1 Committee Reports 2 Committee Reports 25 Adjournment 72 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS 99th GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGULAR SESSION SENATE TRANSCRIPT 112th Legislative Day 5/11/2016 PRESIDING OFFICER: (SENATOR SULLIVAN) Good afternoon. The regular Session of the 99th General Assembly will come to order. Will all the Members please be at their desks? Would our guests in the galleries please rise? The invocation today will be given by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Smith, Divisional Commander for The Salvation Army Chicago Metropolitan Division, Chicago, Illinois. Lieutenant Colonel Smith. LIEUTENANT COLONEL CHARLES SMITH: (Prayer by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Smith) PRESIDING OFFICER: (SENATOR SULLIVAN) Senator Cunningham, to lead us in the Pledge. SENATOR CUNNINGHAM: (Pledge of Allegiance, led by Senator Cunningham) PRESIDING OFFICER: (SENATOR SULLIVAN) Mr. Secretary, Reading and Approval of the Journal. SECRETARY ANDERSON: Senate Journal of Tuesday, May 10th, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUAL JUSTICE ILLINOIS CAMPAIGN S a T C IC IS Access to the Legal System Makes the Difference in People's Lives E I O LLIN Newthe Honorable Philip J
    E Q N U G I A A L P J U M EQUAL JUSTICE ILLINOIS CAMPAIGN S A T C IC IS Access to the Legal System Makes the Difference in People's Lives E I O LLIN NEWThe Honorable Philip J. Rock and The Honorable James R. Thompson, Co-ChairsS State Funding for Legal Aid Sees Critical Increase FY 2006 Budget Includes $2 Million for Illinois Equal Justice Foundation L egal aid funding received a major boost in this legal assistance but cannot afford it,” said Attorney year’s state budget. Funding for the Illinois Equal Justice General Lisa Madigan. “Our legal system was designed Foundation (IEJF) was increased to $2 million, from the for all. With this funding, legal aid organizations previous level of $472,900. The IEJF distributes state throughout the state will make sure that low-income funding for civil legal aid to not-for-profit Illinois residents have access to that system.” organizations throughout the state. This additional The effort to increase legal aid funding enjoyed strong funding will enable those organizations to help more bi-partisan support within the Illinois General Assembly. than 30,000 families in crisis, victims of domestic vio- Senators Jeff Schoenberg (D, 9th) and Kirk Dillard (R, lence and the elderly. 24th) led the effort and sponsored bills to increase the “With this funding, the state will help low-income state appropriation for civil legal aid to $2 M and $1 M residents who have nowhere else to turn get the legal respectively. help they need that is essential to their safety and inde- “Legal aid funding is a solid investment for our state,” pendence.
    [Show full text]