DOCSLIB.ORG

Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.11 Interview # 11: November 17, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.11 Interview # 11: November 17, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue An Interview with Governor Jim Edgar Volume III (Sessions 11-16) Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.11 Interview # 11: November 17, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 DePue: Today is Tuesday, November 17, 2009. My name is Mark DePue, the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, and we are in with another session with Gov. Jim Edgar. Good morning, Governor. Edgar: Good morning. DePue: We’ve had quite a few of these, and it’s been quite a while since our last one, when we talked about the 1990 election. And there were a couple things I know you wanted to say about the 1990 election, but let’s start with this question: what was it about that election, do you think looking back at it now, that made the difference for you and your campaign? Edgar: First of all, I don’t think I should have won that election. People wanted a change. We had had a Republican administration for fourteen years. His [Gov. Jim Thompson] numbers weren’t real good at that point, and I was tied to him. I had a Democratic opponent who was a pretty good campaigner, very well known. I think what made the difference was my ten years as secretary of state, just being out there—people knew me. They knew me differently than just another Republican politician. Now, I’m sure [some] thought of me that way, but a lot of folks, they knew who I was, they knew a little about my family, and there was a connect. I think that connect is critical in any election, at least in the United States, in the state of Illinois. And I think that fact of being out and about much more than my Democratic opponent had been out and about. He was known—his name recognition was almost as good as mine—but he hadn’t been out to all the groups as many times as I had been, because he started well-known. I started as an unknown when I first became secretary of state, and I think I always knew that I had to keep up that pace. Particularly with ethnic groups, a lot of associations in the Chicago area where I shouldn’t have been that strong, I ran very strong. So I don’t think it was because Jim Edgar Interview # ISG-A-L-2009-019 VOL III we were Republicans; in fact, I think [I won] in spite of being a Republican. Just all those nights out away from home, all those weekends and festivals, and spending all the time with those different ethnic groups, I think made the difference in that election. Also, I think we were better organized on getting the vote out, which was important. I think Carter Hendren, the person who headed up my campaign, did a very good job of making sure we did the absentee votes, the voter registration, and then on election day, get the votes out—more so than the Democrats. There wasn’t quite as much enthusiasm in some of the Democrats as I think there was among the Republicans. And because we’d had the office so long, we should have been more complacent; they should have been hungrier. They were hungry, but I think we were just as hungry to hold on. But all that aside, again, I go back and just think that in ten years as secretary of state, I had developed an awareness on the part of the public, which made the difference. The other thing that I think didn’t hurt as much as they thought it was going to hurt—and it definitely helped me as governor; I think it made me as governor—was my position on the temporary income tax. The fact that I had said before the election I wanted to make that permanent, there’s no doubt that probably hurt in some areas. It gave the Democrats a chance to tie me to what they were—the theme on [Jim] Thompson was more taxes, more taxes—but it also, I think, solidified my support among groups like teachers, maybe more of an intellectual group out there that wasn’t always voting for Republicans in this state. But because I did that in the campaign, I survived, then, when I had to make it permanent—and we’ll talk about that later—people didn’t get upset, people didn’t get mad. They knew it was coming; in fact, made it much easier to do it. I think that helped establish that you can trust or you can believe Edgar. So that was a very important thing in that campaign, which many, particularly the Republican side, thought would cost me the election. It didn’t. It probably didn’t help me all that much in the election, but it didn’t cost me the election. And I think because I had developed a rapport with the voters as secretary of state, and they had some kind of an impression with me, all the stuff that went on in the campaign didn’t change that. They felt comfortable, even though they wanted a change, that I was enough of a change. DePue: Let me echo a couple of comments that I’ve heard from some of your lieutenants about that question. And their view, especially on the surcharge, is that you ultimately were much more credible than Neil Hartigan was, that they [the voters] believed what you were saying. The public understood, we’re going to take the surcharge but there will be no new taxes, and they [didn’t think] what Hartigan was 518 Jim Edgar Interview # ISG-A-L-2009-019 VOL III saying would add up. It didn’t make sense. It wasn’t coming together. And that was the comment that I consistently got from some other people. 1 Edgar: I believe that, too. I do think that people didn’t trust Hartigan on that. And there’s no way you can ever figure out just how many, because of that, trusted me and voted for me, versus how many still were mad about the taxes and just tied me in with taxes and the argument they were making about the Thompson administration and Republicans in general. It’s hard to say. I think I could have probably won the election if I’d have been against the surtax; I don’t think I could have governed successfully if I’d have been against the surtax, and I don’t think people would say, “Gee, what a great governor you were,” today. I think I’d have been just a one-term governor that probably lied to them and had trouble getting the budget back in shape. I don’t think there’s any doubt. We did polling, too, and it showed that people believed me and didn’t believe Hartigan. I’m sure that that offset a lot of the negatives that were out there about I was just going to be another expensive Republican. You have to remember back then that the Democrats—and I think a lot of people had bought it—that Thompson was a spendthrift. He’d run taxes up; I mean, he’d tried a couple times… Now, the surtax wasn’t his—that was Madigan—but still, he had that image out there. And they had, I thought, a very effective commercial that we talked about before, talking about, during the Republican reign, they’ve raised eighty-four taxes—I forget how many; it was every little thing. But that’s what they hammered away early in the campaign, which tightened up the race. And again, I look back, and I just think, I shouldn’t have won that race, because there was that kind of negative feeling toward Thompson. I don’t think it was because he was bad; it was just he’d been in there fourteen years, and I think any time you’re there that long, there’s a tendency—you begin to lose your welcome. And the tax issue, I thought they used very effectively. I kind of played into that to some extent, but we also talked a lot in that campaign about property tax caps, and I do think there was much more concern about property taxes than there was about income tax. Now, a lot of people didn’t give my property tax proposal much credence, and I don’t know if the media ever took it very seriously, but I do think we probably were able, in the suburban area, to give some hope to some voters who maybe weren’t crazy about the surtax position but were more worried about their property taxes. I was out there, really the only one, talking about a specific proposal. I’m not one who thinks that issues often carry the elections, but I think it probably helped me, because we ran very well, particularly in the suburban area—much better than I did downstate.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021
    State of Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability Expiration and Vacancies Governor July 2021 802 Stratton Office Building Springfield, IL 62706 Phone: 217/782-5320 Fax: 217/782-3515 http://cgfa.ilga.gov JOINT COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES House Republican Leader/Chairperson Rep. Jim Durkin Senate Republican Leader Sen. Dan McConchie President of the Senate Sen. Don Harmon Speaker of the House Rep. Emanuel “Chris” Welch COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT FORECASTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY Co-Chairperson Sen. David Koehler Co-Chairperson Rep. C. D. Davidsmeyer Executive Director Clayton Klenke Deputy Director Laurie Eby Senators Representatives Omar Aquino Amy Elik Darren Bailey Amy Grant Donald P. DeWitte Sonya Harper Elgie Sims Elizabeth Hernandez Dave Syverson Anna Moeller The Commission on Government Forecasting & Accountability is a bipartisan legislative support service agency that is responsible for advising the Illinois General Assembly on economic and fiscal policy issues and for providing objective policy research for legislators and legislative staff. The Commission’s board is comprised of twelve legislators-split evenly between the House and Senate and between Democrats and Republicans. The Commission has three internal units--Revenue, Pensions, and Research, each of which has a staff of analysts and researchers who analyze policy proposals, legislation, state revenues & expenditures, and benefit programs, and who provide research services to members and staff of the General Assembly. The Commission’s Revenue and Pension Units annually publish a number of statutorily mandated reports as well as on-demand reports in regard to Illinois’ financial and economic condition, the annual operating and capital budgets, public employee retirement systems, and other policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 No. 62 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, at 12 noon. Senate MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was Connecticut, to perform the duties of the ator John Ensign of Nevada. The cer- called to order by the Honorable RICH- Chair. tificate, the Chair is advised, is in the ARD BLUMENTHAL, a Senator from the DANIEL K. INOUYE, form suggested by the Senate. State of Connecticut. President pro tempore. If there be no objection, the reading Mr. BLUMENTHAL thereupon as- of the certificate will be waived and it PRAYER sumed the chair as Acting President will be printed in full in the RECORD. The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- pro tempore. There being no objection, the mate- fered the following prayer: f rial was ordered to be printed in the Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY RECORD, as follows: Merciful God, take possession of our LEADER STATE OF NEVADA hearts so that we will do Your will. Use The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- Executive Department us for Your glory as beacons of light pore. The majority leader is recog- CERTIFICATE OF APPOINTMENT and inspiration in our Nation and nized. world. We desire for Your name to re- To the President of the Senate of the United ceive the honor it is due.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Assembly on Political Representation and Alternative Electoral Systems I 3 4 FOREWORD
    ILLINOIS ASSEMBLY ON POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND ALTERNATIVE # ELECTORAL SYSTEMS FINAL REPORT AND BACKGROUND PAPERS ILLINOIS ASSEMBLY ON POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND ALTERNATIVE #ELECTORAL SYSTEMS FINAL REPORT AND BACKGROUND PAPERS S P R I N G 2 0 0 1 2 CONTENTS Foreword...................................................................................................................................... 5 Jack H. Knott I. Introduction and Summary of the Assembly Report ......................................................... 7 II. National and International Context ..................................................................................... 15 An Overview of the Core Issues ....................................................................................... 15 James H. Kuklinski Electoral Reform in the UK: Alive in ‘95.......................................................................... 17 Mary Georghiou Electoral Reform in Japan .................................................................................................. 19 Thomas Lundberg 1994 Elections in Italy .........................................................................................................21 Richard Katz New Zealand’s Method for Representing Minorities .................................................... 26 Jack H. Nagel Voting in the Major Democracies...................................................................................... 30 Center for Voting and Democracy The Preference Vote and Election of Women .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Community College Trustees Association Action Alert May 20, 2008
    Illinois Community College Trustees Association Action Alert May 20, 2008 SENATE APPROVES LOCAL CONTROL LEGISLATION This afternoon the Illinois Senate unanimously approved legislation that clarifies that community colleges are units of local government, not state agencies. House Bill 4189, which passed the House several weeks ago with a vote of 91 - 14 - 0, passed the Senate with a vote of 58 - 0 - 0. The bill will soon be sent to the Governor for his action. HB 4189 is ICCTA’s highest priority legislation this year; it reinforces the local control concept and clarifies that community college districts are units of local government under the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act. The bill clearly excludes community college districts from the definition of state agencies and clearly includes community college districts in the definition of units of local government under the Ethics Act. Enacting House Bill 4189 into law would render moot a court case currently pending before the Second Appellate Court. In 2005, a number of community colleges initiated a legal action based on the ambiguity of the definition of a state agency described herein. That case was decided in favor of the community colleges, and an appeal is pending. House sponsors of HB 4189 are: Robert W. Pritchard - William B. Black - Arthur L. Turner - Mike Boland - Kenneth Dunkin, Patricia R. Bellock, Donald L. Moffitt, Elaine Nekritz, Kathleen A. Ryg, Suzanne Bassi and JoAnn D. Osmond. Senate sponsors of HB 4189 are: Edward D. Maloney, Dale E. Risinger - Kimberly A. Lightford - Christine Radogno, Todd Sieben, David Luechtefeld, James F. Clayborne Jr., Kirk W.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Gene Reineke # ISG-A-L-2009-038 Interview # 1: December 7, 2009 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 DePue: Today is Monday, December 7, 2009. My name is Mark DePue; I’m the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. I’m here this afternoon with Eugene Reineke, but you mentioned usually you’re known as Gene. Reineke: That’s correct, Mark. DePue: Why don’t you tell us where we are. Reineke: We’re here at my current employer, which is Hill & Knowlton, Inc. It’s a public relations firm, and we’re located at the Merchandise Mart in downtown Chicago. DePue: Which has a fascinating history itself. Someday I’ll have to delve into that one. We’re obviously here to talk about your experiences in the Edgar administration, but you had a lot of years working with Jim Thompson as well, so we’re going to take quite a bit of time. In today’s session, I don’t know that we’ll get to much of the Edgar experience because you’ve got enough information to talk about before that time, which is valuable history for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007 No. 47 Senate The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was appoint the Honorable MARK L. PRYOR, a After all, this was a President who called to order by the Honorable MARK Senator from the State of Arkansas, to per- won two elections by the barest of mar- L. PRYOR, a Senator from the State of form the duties of the Chair. gins, first by the Supreme Court. Yet Arkansas. ROBERT C. BYRD, after 9/11, instead of uniting the coun- President pro tempore. try, he has chosen to push the envelope PRAYER Mr. PRYOR thereupon assumed the of his authority. On everything from The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- chair as Acting President pro tempore. the runup to the war in Iraq, to the fered the following prayer: f plan to destroy Social Security, to the Let us pray: RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY use of warrantless wiretapping, this ad- Lord, You have promised to work for LEADER ministration has governed without the good of those who love You. Work compromise. in the lives of our lawmakers, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- The political purge of U.S. attorneys strengthening them for every problem, pore. The majority leader is recog- is only the latest example of this Presi- trial, and temptation they face. Open nized. dent’s unhealthy disregard for checks their eyes to see Your hand at work f and balances.
    [Show full text]
  • 1644-K CGLA Annual Report.Indd
    Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic | 2006 Annual Report (July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006) 1 11644-K644-K CGLACGLA aannualnnual report.inddreport.indd 1 33/21/07/21/07 77:30:38:30:38 AMAM Executive Director’s Report Dear Friends, Mark called me a number of months ago to ask for help. I was intrigued by this role reversal as I usually fi nd myself reaching out to donors like him for assistance as we deliver free legal services to Chicago’s most vulnerable. Mark and his wife Jennifer are people I deeply admire. They live and work in the Lawndale neighborhood of Chicago – a rough part of town – serving as urban missionaries to a community with real needs. During the call, Mark told me about a young man from his youth program who had recently had a run-in with the police. The 18-year-old (who I will call Jerome) was sitting on his porch on a steamy morning in July when four offi cers Table of Contents approached and questioned him about an incident that had occurred earlier that day. The engagement escalated as Jerome proved uncooperative in answering questions about an event he was uninvolved in and the offi cers responded with vulgarities and racial 4 Case Statistics epithets. Jerome eventually made a smart comment back to the offi cers – something akin to “one day I’ll be your supervisor” – and immediately found himself being carried behind the house for a beating. 5 Financial Summary I confess to some skepticism about the described events during my conversation with Mark; that is, until I saw the evidentiary photo- 6 Funding graphs which document Jerome’s open bloody cuts, welts and scrapes on his shoulder, buttocks, wrist, cheek, eyelid, neck and back.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Friday, September 17, 2010 in the afternoon. I’m sitting in an office located in the library at Northwestern University Law School with Senator Dawn Clark Netsch. Good afternoon, Senator. Netsch: Good afternoon. (laughs) DePue: You’ve had a busy day already, haven’t you? Netsch: Wow, yes. (laughs) And there’s more to come. DePue: Why don’t you tell us quickly what you just came from? Netsch: It was not a debate, but it was a forum for the two lieutenant governor candidates sponsored by the group that represents or brings together the association for the people who are in the public relations business.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.26 Interview # 26: December 14, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
    Interview with Jim Edgar # ISG-A-L-2009-019.26 Interview # 26: December 14, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue DePue: The next person I wanted to ask you about is President Barack Obama. We had talked about him before, but it was always in the context of these other decisions that you were making or with the Blagojevich situation. What do you think about his emergence as a politician? Edgar: Oh, it’s phenomenal. I mean, here’s a guy that’s a state senator, and all of a sudden he’s president (laughs) of the United States within a matter of, what, a little more than two years. That’s a phenomenal accomplishment. DePue: Did he have a prominent role, as you recall, in the Illinois Senate? Edgar: No, no. When I was there, he was a freshman member, and he was in the minority party, so that’s about as insignificant as you could be. I think he was elected in ’96, so the last two years I was governor, he was in the state Senate. But I remember early in that session after the election, my staff person who was working the Senate came to me and said, “Boy, there’s really a bright new African American in the Senate. He is really impressive.” I was rather dubious. I had heard that before. As I often said, when I was a young person, we thought Jesse Jackson was really special; then I think most of us decided that wasn’t true. So I was a little… They make good speeches; sometimes they don’t follow up.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn Vs Rauner John S
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC The imonS Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Simon Public Policy Institute) 1-2015 The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner John S. Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers Paper #40 of the Simon Review Recommended Citation Jackson, John S., "The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner" (2015). The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute). Paper 40. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute) by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Simon Review The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs. Rauner By: John S. Jackson Paper #40 January 2015 A Publication of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Southern Illinois University Carbondale Author’s Note: I want to thank Cary Day, Jacob Trammel and Roy E. Miller for their valuable assistance on this project. THE SIMON REVIEW The Simon Review papers are occasional nonacademic papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale that examine and explore public policy issues within the scope of the Institute’s mission and in the tradition of the University. The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute acts on significant and controversial issues impacting the region, the state, the nation, and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 30 Issue 2 Article 2 December 2012 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Warden Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Rob Warden, How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty, 30(2) LAW & INEQ. 245 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol30/iss2/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. 245 How and Why Illinois Abolished the Death Penalty Rob Wardent Introduction The late J. Paul Getty had a formula for becoming wealthy: rise early, work late-and strike oil.' That is also the formula for abolishing the death penalty, or at least it is a formula-the one that worked in Illinois. When Governor Pat Quinn signed legislation ending capital punishment in Illinois on March 9, 2011, he tacitly acknowledged the early rising and late working that preceded the occasion. "Since our experience has shown that there is no way to design a perfect death penalty system, free from the numerous flaws that can lead to wrongful convictions or discriminatory treatment, I have concluded that the proper course of action is to abolish it." 2 The experience to which the governor referred was not something that dropped like a gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath and seeped into his consciousness by osmosis. Rather, a cadre of public defenders, pro bono lawyers, journalists, academics, and assorted activists, devoted tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, of hours, over more than three decades, to the abolition movement.
    [Show full text]