DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report of the Maryland Judiciary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

3 . \ ""£ " D D D RJ mm ^.J Ui © Q\ MMLYlMm JUBIQAMWJ ANNUAL REPORT of the MARYLAND JUDICIARY 1983-1984 Administrative Office of the Courts Courts of Appeal Building Post Office Box 431 Annapolis, Maryland 21404 301/269-2141 I m RECEIVED nuv zOiybb LAW L!3RA,JvY 7TH CIRCUIT UUURf-LlbKArtii u&MJia uibK. PRINQ&fiEORGFS mUWPf COVER PHOTOGRAPHS 1. District Court Multi-Service Center—Catonsville, Baltimore County 2. The District Court Building—Annapolis, Anne Arundel County 3. District Court Multi-Service Center—Glen Burnie, Anne Arundel County 4. District Court Multi-Service Center—Denton, Caroline County 5. District Court Multi-Service Center—Essex, Baltimore County 6. Multi-Service Courthouse Complex—Frederick, Frederick County I 7. District Court Multi-Service Center—Bel Air, Harford County 8. District Court Multi-Service Center—Ellicott City, Howard County 9. The Court Annex Building—Westminster, Carroll County 10. District Court Multi-Service Center—Elkton, Cecil County 11. District Court Multi-Service Center—Centreville, Queen Anne's County LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS Page 1 District Court Multi-Service Center, Ellicott City, Howard County 3 Multi-Service Courthouse Complex, Frederick, Frederick County 8 District Court Multi-Service Center, Bel Air, Harford County 15 District Court Multi-Service Center, Ellicott City, Howard County 16 District Court Multi-Service Center, Elkton, Cecil County 16 District Court Building, Annapolis, Anne Arundel County 17 District Court Multi-Service Center, Denton, Caroline County 18 District Court Multi-Service Center, Centreville, Queen Anne's County 20 Multi-Service Courthouse Complex, Frederick, Frederick County 23 District Court Multi-Service Center, Essex, Baltimore County 25 District Court Multi-Service Center, Glen Burnie, Anne Arundel County 25 The Court Annex Building, Westminster, Carroll County 29 Multi-Service Courthouse Complex, Frederick, Frederick County 31 District Court Multi-Service Center, Elkton, Cecil County Report prepared by the Administrative Office of the Courts Editor—Deborah AJ Unitus Photographs by the Honorable1 Thomas J. Curley Contents Letter of Transmittal iv Introduction v Judicial Revenues and Expenditures 1 The Maryland Courts 4 The Court of Appeals 4 The Court of Special Appeals 5 The Circuit Courts 6 The District Court 9 Trends 10 Judicial Administration 12 Administrative Office of the Courts . : 12 Judicial Education and Information Services 13 Judicial Information Systems 13 Judicial Special Projects, Research and Planning Services 14 Judicial Administrative Services 15 Judicial Personnel Services 15 Sentencing Guidelines Project 15 Liaison with the Legislative and Executive Branches 16 Circuit Court Administration 16 District Court Administration 16 Assignment of Judges 18 Court-Related Units 19 Board of Law Examiners 19 Rules Committee 20 State Law Library 21 Attorney Grievance Commission 21 Clients' Security Trust Fund 22 Judicial Conferences 23 The Maryland Judicial Conference 23 Conference of Circuit Judges 23 Administrative Judges Committee of the District Court 25 Appointment, Discipline, and Removal of Judges 26 Judicial Nominating Commissions 26 Removal and Discipline of Judges 28 The Commission on Judicial Disabilities . 28 1984 Legislation Affecting the Courts 30 Judicial Maps and Members of the Judiciary 32 Letter of Ttansmittal ADMINISTRATIVK OFKICK OF THE COURTS COURTS OK APPKAI. BUILIIINC ANNAPOLIS. MAKYLAM) 21401 2h<4-2l4l September 25, 1984 It is a pleasure to present the eighth Annual fleport 0/ the Maryiand Judiciary, which includes the twenty- ninth Annual Report of the Administrative Office of the Courts, as required by §13-101 (d)(9) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. The report covers fiscal 1984, beginning July 1,1983 and ending June 30, 1984. I The report is in two volumes. Volume 1 treats the funding, functions, workload, and prpgrams of the court system in overview fashion, highlighted by graphics. It is intended for broad general circulation to the judiciary and other governmental officials and employees and to the citizens of the State interested in Maryland's judicial system. Volume 2 is a statistical abstract designed more for the analyst, clerk, or court administrator. This volume contains data providing detailed support for much of the material in volume 1. The statistics on which much of the report is based have been provided through the fine efforts of the clerks of the circuit courts for the, counties and Baltimore City and the clerks of the District Court of Maryland. I take this opportunity of publicly acknowledging the invaluable assistance of all who have contributed to the preparation of this report. I hope this report on the judicial branch will provide useful information to the citizens of Maryland, as well as to those directly concerned in the activities of the court system. au»nu\ H- \o"^ James H. Norris, Jr. State Court Administrator Introduction The eighth Annual Report of the Maryland Judiciary, as in past reports, outlines the functions and respon- sibihties of the judicial department of Maryland. It also presents an accounting of the work of the judiciary for the period July 1,1983—June 30,1984. The report por- trays a judicial system striving, both effectively and efficiently, to cope with massive caseloads while never losing sight of the primary commitment to individual justice by resolving disputes in a fair and expeditious manner. I am pleased to present this report on behalf of all the judges and the supporting staff of the courts. I am hopeful that a reading of the report will encourage members of other branches of government, as well as the public in general, to gain a better understanding of the judicial department and to join with us in our continuing efforts for a fully effective justice system. Robert C. Murphy Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland THE MARYLAND JUDICIAL SYSTEM COURT OF APPEALS I Chief Judge and I 6 associates COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS Chief Judge and 12 associates Cl RCUI T COURT s ___ ___ I 1 1 FIRST C IRCUIT SECOND CIRCUIT THIRD C RCUIT FOURTH C IRCUIT FIFTH :IR ;UIT SIXTH CIRCUIT SEVENTH CIRCUIT EIGHTH CIRCUIT Dorch ester Caro ine Baltintore Allega ny Anne / \ru idel Frederick Calvert Baltimore City Somf rset Ce :il Hart ird Garrs tt Ca rol Montgomery Charles Wico mico Ke nt Washin gton Hovvar I Prince George's Wore ester Queen ;\nne's St. Mary's Tal )0t (6 Judges) (6 Judges) (16Judges) (6 Judges) (15 Judges) (14 Judges) (18 Judges) (23 Judges) ORPHANS' COURTS All political subdivisions except Harford and Montgomery Counties THE DISTRICT COURT CHIEF JUDGE 1 I I I DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 9 DISTRICT 10 DISTRICT 11 DISTRICT 12 Baltimore City Dorchester Caroline Calvert Prince George's Montgomery Anne Arundel Baltimore Harford Carroll Frederick Allegany Somerset Cecil Charles Howard Washington Garrett Wicomico Kent St. Mary's Worcester Queen Anne's Talbot (22 Judges) | (4 Judges) (6 Judges) i (3 Judges) (9 Judges) (10 Judges) (6 Judges; (12 Judges) (3 Judges) (5 Judges) (4 Judges) (3 Judges) Judicial Revenues and Expenditures State and local costs to support the operations of the ments paid by lawyers entitled to practice law in Mary- judicial branch of government in Maryland were ap- land. These supporting funds are not included in the proximately $83 million in fiscal 1984. The judicial judicial budget. branch consists of the Court of Appeals; the Court of The figures in the table show the state-funded Special Appeals; the circuit courts, including the Cir- judicial revenues and expenditures for fiscal 1984. The cuit Court for Baltimore City; the District Court of court-related revenue of $33,060,855 is remitted to the Maryland; the clerks' offices and headquarters of State's general fund and cannot be used to offset these several courts; the Administrative Office of the expenditures. Courts; the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice The total state budget was $6.5 billion in fiscal and Procedure of the Court of Appeals; the State Board 1984. The illustration reflects that the state-funded of Law Examiners; the Maryland State Law Library; judicial budget consumes but a tiny fraction of the en- the Commission on Judicial Disabilities; the Clients' tire state budget, approximately six-tenths of one Security Trust Fund; and the Attorney Greivance Com- percent. mission. There are 217 judicial positions as of July 1, Operating costs for the clerks' offices of the cir- 1984 and approximately 2,800 nonjudicial positions in cuit courts are paid from filing fees, court costs, and the judicial branch. commissions collected by these offices. Any deficiency The state-funded judiciary budget operates on a is paid by the State from a fund maintained by the State program budget concept and expended $38,166,652 in Comptroller and from a general fund appropriation. the twelve-month period ending June 30, 1984. The two Expenses for fiscal 1984 were approximately appellate courts and the clerks' offices are funded by $25,208,592. Fees, costs and commissions totaled two programs. Another program pays the salaries and $23,923,296, resulting in the net deficiency of official travel costs for the circuit court judges. The $1,285,296. Seven of the 24 clerks' offices ended the largest program is the state-funded District Court year with a surplus, but this reverts to the general fund which expended $23,221,577, but brought in general and cannot be used to offset deficits occurring in other revenue of $32,714,383 in fiscal 1984. The Maryland offices. The net deficiency figure includes the surplus Judicial Conference contains funds for continuing counties. However, the gross deficiency before judicial education and conference activities. Remain- subtracting any surplus was approximately $4,461,758 ing programs provide funds for the Administrative Of- in fiscal 1984. Contributing partly to the size of the fice of the Courts, the Maryland State Law Library, deficiency is the newly created Circuit Court for the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Pro- Baltimore City.
Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of the United States

    Supreme Court of the United States

    No. _________ ================================================================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ALFREDO JUAREZ, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of Colorado --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PHILIP L. TORREY Counsel of Record CRIMMIGRATION CLINIC HARVARD IMMIGRATION AND CLINICAL PROGRAM HARVARD LAW SCHOOL 6 Everett Street, Suite 3105 Cambridge, MA 02138 (617) 495-0638 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner ================================================================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In Padilla v. Kentucky, this Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel requires counsel to provide correct legal advice to noncitizen-defendants about the immigration con- sequences of a prospective guilty plea. 559 U.S. 356, 368–69 (2010). If federal law is “succinct, clear, and explicit” about the immigration consequences of a guilty plea, then defense counsel’s duty to explain those consequences is equally clear. Id. at 368. In con- trast, defense counsel need
  • A Guide to Civil Lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

    A Guide to Civil Lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

    Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Jan. 1, 2020 A Guide to Civil Lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Disclaimer: The contents of this guide are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. 1 | Page Civil Lawsuit Guide – Eff. Jan. 1, 2020 Welcome. The judges and staff of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado welcome you, for whatever reason brings you to the federal trial court for Colorado – whether you are a participant in a lawsuit, have been called as a witness in a case, have been summoned as a juror, or are a supportive family member or friend and are visiting any of the courthouses of the District of Colorado. The court’s judicial officers, the staff of the court, members of the bar, and the court community share the same goals as those expressed by the late Chief Judge Alfred A. Arraj (after whom the newest federal courthouse in Denver is named) on the day of his taking the oath of office as the sixth U.S. District Judge for Colorado: “I embark on this new career with a sense of humility, but with a firm and steadfast resolution to administer justice punctually and impartially without regard to the race, the creed or the station in life of the litigants who may appear in the court over which I may preside.” TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 - Introduction – Is this Guide for You? .......................................................... 3 Part 2 - Before you File your Lawsuit: Things to Know. ........................................ 7 Part 3 - How to Start Your Lawsuit.
  • Montgomery County Circuit Court FY 2015 Annual Statistical Digest

    Montgomery County Circuit Court FY 2015 Annual Statistical Digest

    FY2015 Statistical Digest Montgomery County Circuit Court Administrative Office of Montgomery County Circuit Court 1 Table of Contents Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust: Continual, Collaborative Review of Court Performance ........................................................................................................................ 2 Montgomery County and Circuit Court Statistics............................................................ 3 Population of Montgomery County ................................................................................................... 3 Racial and Ethnic Diversity - Minorities are Majority Population ................................................... 5 Increase in Foreign-Born Residents ................................................................................................. 7 Maturing County Population ...........................................................................................................14 Crime Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 17 Domestic Violence Statistics ........................................................................................................... 23 Workload and Case Processing Analysis .......................................................................... 26 Workload Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 26 Case Processing Analysis
  • Courts at a Glance

    Courts at a Glance

    Courts at a Glance For Everyone From Students to Seniors Published by Iowa Judicial Branch Branches of American Government Separation of Powers The governmental system of the United States uses separation of powers. This means that the government has separate branches that deal with different as- pects of governing. These three branches are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This system is in place for both the federal (national) and state governments. The legislative branch, which on the national level is the U.S. Congress, passes new laws. The executive branch, headed by the president, enforces laws. The judicial branch, headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, inter- prets laws. While each branch has its own duties, the other branches of govern- ment have some control over its actions. These interactions are called checks and balances. Checks and balances keep one branch of government from being much stronger than the others. See the diagram below for U.S. checks and balances. U.S. Checks & Balances Confirms or rejects appointments by executive (including judges) Can veto legislation Apppoints judges È È È È Legislative Executive Judicial Writes laws Enforces laws Interprets laws Ç Ç Can declare acts of the legislative or executive branch to be unconstitutional Role of the Judicial Branch Every state and the federal government have an independent judicial branch to interpret and apply state and federal laws to specific cases. By providing a place where people can go to resolve disputes according to law, through a fair process, and before a knowledgeable and neutral judge or jury, the judicial branch helps to maintain peace and order in society.
  • Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions

    Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions

    Maryland Law Review Volume 38 | Issue 2 Article 7 Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Survey of Maryland Court of Appeals Decisions, 38 Md. L. Rev. 242 (1978) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol38/iss2/7 This Casenotes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEY OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS THE INHERENT POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION - STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION v. CLARK Maryland courts have frequently claimed an inherent power to review and correct arbitrary, illegal, capricious, or unreasonable administrative decisions.' Recently, however, in State Department of Assessments and Taxation v. Clark,2 the Maryland Court of Appeals restricted the scope of this power by finding that a circuit court did not have jurisdiction to determine whether administrative authority to reduce a real property assessment pursuant to article 81, section 67 of the Maryland Code was exercised in an arbitrary fashion.3 The Court of Appeals held that the circuit courts' jurisdiction is limited to questions concerning the constitutionality of the administrator's actions. 4 Clark implicitly recognized that circuit courts 1. E.g., Zion Evangelical Luth. Church v. State Highway Admin., 276 Md.
  • Federal Courts & What They Do

    Federal Courts & What They Do

    Federal Courts & What They Do Contents What Is a Court? 1 What Is a Federal Court? 2 What Kinds of Federal Courts Are There? 2 Map: Geographical Boundaries of U.S. Courts of Appeals and U.S. District Courts 3 Who Sets Up the Federal Court System? 4 What’s the Difference Between Civil Cases and Criminal Cases? 4 What Kinds of Cases Are Tried in State Courts? 5 What Kinds of Cases Are Tried in Federal Courts? 6 How Does a Case Come into a Federal Court? 7 Is There a Trial for Every Case? 8 Diagram: The Court Systems of the United States 9 May I Watch a Trial in Progress? 10 What Is the Purpose of the Trial? 10 Who Are the People in the Courtroom? 12 What Happens During a Trial? 15 What Happens After the Trial or Guilty Plea? 20 What Are Some of the Most Noteworthy Facts and Concepts You Should Remember About the Federal Courts? 24 Glossary 25 Federal Courts and What They Do elcome to the U.S. Courthouse. During your visit, you’ll see Wjudges and their staffs, jurors, lawyers, and people who are involved in court cases. This pamphlet answers some of the ques- tions visitors to the federal courts ask most often. It will help you understand what you see and hear in the courthouse. Of course, legal proceedings are often complex, and a pamphlet such as this may not answer all of your questions. In the back is a glossary of legal terms that you’ll find in this pamphlet.
  • The Legacy of Justice in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County

    The Legacy of Justice in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County

    Their Story: The Legacy of Justice in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County The Honorable Sheila R. Tillerson Adams Administrative Judge of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Honorable Albert W. Northrop Born in Illinois, the Honorable Albert W. Northrop is the son of an U.S. Air Force chaplain. As a result, he and his family moved every few years. Judge Northrop attended University of Maryland at Munich Campus, in Munich, Germany. Shortly after, Judge Northrop transferred to University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland where he received his bachelor’s of arts degree in June 1969. Following, he returned to the University of Maryland School of Law and received his law degree in 1974. One year later, in 1975, he was admitted to the Maryland Bar. He entered private practice of law in February 1975. Judge Northrop was appointed to the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County in June 2006. Judge Northrop served as an Associate Judge of District Court of Maryland, District 5, Prince George’s County from January 2003 to June 2006. Judge Northrop was sworn in as a Judge of the Orphans Court for Prince George’s County in August 1986. During his time as Judge of Orphans Court, Judge Northrop co-authored, “Decedents’ Estates in Maryland” published by Mitchie Law Book Publishing. In October 2017, Judge Northrop retired from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. Honorable C. Philip Nichols, Jr. A fifth generation Prince Georgian, C. Philip Nichols, Jr. graduated from Georgetown University in 1969 and received his law degree from University of Baltimore School of Law in 1973.
  • Federal and Local Jurisdiction in the District of Columbia

    Federal and Local Jurisdiction in the District of Columbia

    Notes Federal and Local Jurisdiction in the District of Columbia The 1982 trial of John Hinckley for the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan brought to the public's attention a unique fea- ture of the criminal justice system in the District of Columbia. Although federal and state charges never are joined together for trial, federal and D.C. Code charges may be joined in one indictment under section 11- 502(3) of the D.C. Code,' and tried before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.' In the Hinckley case, the federal prosecutor used section 11-502(3) to join three federal and ten D.C. Code charges. This joinder required the district court to determine whether to use both federal and D.C. Code evidentiary standards during the trial, or only one standard. The court ruled that only federal standards would be used,' and therefore placed the 1. Under D.C. CODE ANN. § 11-502(3) (1981), the United States District Court has jurisdiction over "[any offense under any law applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia which offense is joined in the same information or indictment with any Federal offense." A similar but more limited jurisdictional statute is found at D.C. CODE ANN. § 23-311(b) (1981): Two or more offenses may be charged in the same indictment or information as provided in subsection (a) [offenses charged are of similar character or based on same transaction] even though one or more is in violation of the laws of the United States and another is in violation of the laws applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia and may be prosecuted as pro- vided in Section 11-502(3).
  • Lawsuits Against the Federal Government: Basic Federal Court Procedure and Timelines

    Lawsuits Against the Federal Government: Basic Federal Court Procedure and Timelines

    Updated December 22, 2020 Lawsuits Against the Federal Government: Basic Federal Court Procedure and Timelines Many federal laws and policy initiatives are challenged in cannot succeed as a matter of law. The court may deny a court. In recent years, for instance, plaintiffs have brought motion to dismiss or may grant the motion with respect to cases challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s the case as a whole or only as to certain claims. rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, the Secretary of Commerce’s decision to include a If the court does not grant a motion to dismiss in full, the citizenship question on the 2020 Census, and the case proceeds to discovery, the process by which parties President’s decision to expend certain funds to construct a exchange evidence. Once the factual record is sufficiently “border wall.” Because the defendant in these cases is the developed, either party (or both) may file a motion for United States or an executive official, the cases generally summary judgment, arguing that the other party cannot proceed in federal court. By understanding the procedures prevail in light of the applicable law and the undisputed governing federal court litigation, legislators can consider facts. The district court judge may resolve legal questions at potential outcomes, estimate timelines, and appreciate the this stage but may not resolve factual disputes. As with a importance of a court’s ruling at a particular stage. This In motion to dismiss, the court may grant summary judgment Focus reviews the most common procedures that govern in full or in part; it may also grant summary judgment in civil suits against the federal government, tracing the path favor of the plaintiff on some claims and in favor of the from federal district court to the Supreme Court.

  • Summer/Fall 2006

    SUMMER/FALL 2006 JUDICIAL VIOLENCE Tipping the Scales Tribal Courses Deliver Impact Maryland’s Technology Court The Complex Litigation Puzzle Family of Judges: It’s in Their Blood CASE IN POINT Vol. 5, No. 2, Summer/Fall 2006 CASE IN POINT is published two times a year by The National Judicial College. Articles and information that appear in CASE IN POINT do not necessarily reflect the official position of The National Judicial College. Published articles do not constitute an endorsement of views which may be expressed. Readers are invited to address comments and suggestions to the publisher/editor; however, we cannot guarantee the publication or return of unsolicited manuscripts. CASE IN POINT articles and content are copyright protected. The National Judicial College encour- ages republication and dissemination of articles it publishes with permission. To secure permission to reprint CASE IN POINT articles, please contact the publisher/editor. CASE IN POINT the The National Judicial College Judicial College Building/MS 358 Reno, NV 89557 Editorial Team (800) 25-JUDGE (800-255-8343) From left to right: Fax: (775) 327-2167 Trace Robbers, Director of Communications www.judges.org Christina Nellemann, Graphic Designer EXECUTIVE OFFICE Heather Singer, Communications Specialist Hon. William F. Dressel, President Nancy Copfer, Scholarship Officer EXECUTIVE EDITOR Trace Robbers 2007 Courses Offered on Campus, Online and Around the Nation (775) 784-6747 email: [email protected] eeting the educational and professional development needs NJC BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the judiciary is the key focus for the NJC’s staff and Justice Carl O. Bradford, Chair, Portland, ME Thomas M.
  • Washington County, Maryland

    Washington County, Maryland

    Washington County, Maryland Approved Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2004 Produced By: Department of Budget and Finance 100 West Washington Street Room 304 Hagerstown, Maryland 21740 (240) 313-2300 Washington County, Maryland County Commissioners Gregory I. Snook William J. Wivell President Vice President James F. Kercheval Doris J. Nipps John C. Munson Table of Contents Vision and Mission Statement………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Budget Summary – All Funds…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Personnel Summary by Fund…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 General Fund Revenue Summary: 4 Property Tax…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Local Tax………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Interest Earnings…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 Charges for Services…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 Grants for Operations………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 General Fund Expenditure Summary: 11 Education: 12 Board of Education Maintenance of Effort…….…………………………………………………………… 13 Other Board of Education Funding…………………………………………………………………………… 15 School Health Nurses………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 Hagerstown Community College………………………………………………………………………………. 19 Maryland School for the Blind………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Washington County Free Library…………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Public Safety: 25 Judicial………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 Patrol…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 Detention Center…………………………………………………………………………………………………….
  • Summons and Complaint Circuit Court Virginia Sample

    Summons and Complaint Circuit Court Virginia Sample

    Summons And Complaint Circuit Court Virginia Sample Ethan still dibbing defiantly while undescendable Jameson curse that metage. Mathias remains secularistic after Hagen overwriting anticipatively or courts any yammer. Panzer and cosher Clare unburden his falx intoning emits untidily. Responding to contest Divorce let Law poverty-help Center. If the plaintiff fails to pit the summons and complaint on a. Motion for complaint if you sent a claim, property damage is software accessed through physical custody sample complaint and summons circuit court virginia have been received a summons which you and. For special interrogatories in the system and circuit in which you can sign. In order for reading to cramp a posture in Virginia either tree or your in must break a. What you might be added to a sample complaint form to do not believe those addresses are sample response to answer to keep your papers initiating papers. Where they I file a Conciliation Court claim If and case involves bad checks the superior should be filed in middle District seven of separate county retain the checks were. Docket no response explaining what each defense attorney in virginia and circuit court summons. Juhtumeid on child custody order vacating default by name search, which together can search online, subpoena relates and circuit and summons complaint court payments online electronic system provides helpful information. Service failure the summons and complaint on a corporation is governed by Fed R Civ P 4h. Clerks under penalty for summons and complaint circuit court virginia sample from abuse claims? Rule 35 The Summons Va R Sup Ct 35 Casetext.