DOCSLIB.ORG

Metal Prices in the United States Through 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metal Prices in the United States Through 2010 Metal Prices in the United States Through 2010 Aluminum Germanium Mercury Silver Antimony Gold Molybdenum Tantalum Arsenic Hafnium Nickel Tellurium Beryllium Indium Niobium Thallium Bismuth Iron and Steel Platinum-Group Metals Tin Cadmium Iron and Steel Scrap Rare-Earth Metals Titanium Cesium Iron Ore Rhenium Tungsten Chromium Lead Rubidium Vanadium Cobalt Lithium Selenium Zinc Copper Magnesium Silicon Zirconium Gallium Manganese 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5188 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Metal Prices in the United States Through 2010 By U.S. Geological Survey National Minerals Information Center staff Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5188 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: U.S. Geological Survey, 2013, Metal prices in the United States through 2010: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5188, 204 p., available only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5188. iii Contents Introduction and Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................1 Aluminum (Al) .................................................................................................................................................2 Antimony (Sb) .................................................................................................................................................7 Arsenic (As) ..................................................................................................................................................10 Beryllium (Be) ...............................................................................................................................................13 Bismuth (Bi)...................................................................................................................................................17 Cadmium (Cd)................................................................................................................................................22 Cesium (Cs) ...................................................................................................................................................25 Chromium (Cr) ...............................................................................................................................................28 Cobalt (Co) .....................................................................................................................................................37 Copper (Cu) ...................................................................................................................................................45 Gallium (Ga)...................................................................................................................................................52 Germanium (Ge) ...........................................................................................................................................55 Gold (Au) ........................................................................................................................................................58 Hafnium (Hf) ..................................................................................................................................................63 Indium (In) .....................................................................................................................................................66 Iron and Steel (Fe)........................................................................................................................................69 Iron and Steel Scrap (Fe) ............................................................................................................................73 Iron Ore (Fe) ..................................................................................................................................................76 Lead (Pb)........................................................................................................................................................81 Lithium (Li) .....................................................................................................................................................85 Magnesium (Mg) ..........................................................................................................................................88 Manganese (Mn)..........................................................................................................................................93 Mercury (Hg).................................................................................................................................................98 Molybdenum (Mo)......................................................................................................................................101 Nickel (Ni)....................................................................................................................................................105 Niobium (Columbium) (Nb) .......................................................................................................................114 Platinum-Group Metals (Ir, Os, Pd, Pt, Rh, Ru) ......................................................................................119 Rare-Earth Metals (Ce, Dy, Eu, Gd, La, Nd, Pr, Sm, Sc, Tb, Y) .............................................................133 Rhenium (Re)...............................................................................................................................................152 Rubidium (Rb)..............................................................................................................................................155 Selenium (Se)..............................................................................................................................................158 Silicon (Si) ...................................................................................................................................................161 Silver (Ag) ....................................................................................................................................................167 Tantalum (Ta) ..............................................................................................................................................171 Tellurium (Te) ..............................................................................................................................................175 Thallium (Tl).................................................................................................................................................178 Tin (Sn) .........................................................................................................................................................181 Titanium (Ti) .................................................................................................................................................184 Tungsten (W) ...............................................................................................................................................187 Vanadium (V) ...............................................................................................................................................194 Zinc (Zn) .......................................................................................................................................................197 iv Zirconium (Zr) .............................................................................................................................................201 Appendix 1. Price Deflators ..................................................................................................................204 Metal Prices in the United States Through 2010 By U.S. Geological Survey National Minerals Information Center staff Introduction and Acknowledgments Platts Metals Week, Roskill Information Services Ltd. commodity reports, and Ryan’s Notes. Price information also This report, which updates and revises the U.S. is available in minerals information publications of the USGS Geological Survey (USGS) (1999) publication, “Metal Prices (1880–1925, 1996–present) and the U.S. Bureau of Mines in the United States Through 1998,” presents an extended (1926–95), such as Mineral Commodity Summaries, Mineral price history for a wide range of metals available in a single Facts and Problems,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LOW TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL COPPER, NICKEL, and COBALT ARSENIDE and SULFIDE ORE FORMATION Nicholas Allin
    Montana Tech Library Digital Commons @ Montana Tech Graduate Theses & Non-Theses Student Scholarship Spring 2019 EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE THERMOCHEMICAL REDUCTION OF ARSENITE AND SULFATE: LOW TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL COPPER, NICKEL, AND COBALT ARSENIDE AND SULFIDE ORE FORMATION Nicholas Allin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/grad_rsch Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE THERMOCHEMICAL REDUCTION OF ARSENITE AND SULFATE: LOW TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL COPPER, NICKEL, AND COBALT ARSENIDE AND SULFIDE ORE FORMATION by Nicholas C. Allin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Geoscience: Geology Option Montana Technological University 2019 ii Abstract Experiments were conducted to determine the relative rates of reduction of aqueous sulfate and aqueous arsenite (As(OH)3,aq) using foils of copper, nickel, or cobalt as the reductant, at temperatures of 150ºC to 300ºC. At the highest temperature of 300°C, very limited sulfate reduction was observed with cobalt foil, but sulfate was reduced to sulfide by copper foil (precipitation of Cu2S (chalcocite)) and partly reduced by nickel foil (precipitation of NiS2 (vaesite) + NiSO4·xH2O). In the 300ºC arsenite reduction experiments, Cu3As (domeykite), Ni5As2, or CoAs (langisite) formed. In experiments where both sulfate and arsenite were present, some produced minerals were sulfarsenides, which contained both sulfide and arsenide, i.e. cobaltite (CoAsS). These experiments also produced large (~10 µm along longest axis) euhedral crystals of metal-sulfide that were either imbedded or grown upon a matrix of fine-grained metal-arsenides, or, in the case of cobalt, metal-sulfarsenide. Some experimental results did not show clear mineral formation, but instead demonstrated metal-arsenic alloying at the foil edges.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Minerals Checklist
    Division of Geology and Earth Resources MS 47007; Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washington State 360-902-1450; 360-902-1785 fax E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology Minerals Checklist Note: Mineral names in parentheses are the preferred species names. Compiled by Raymond Lasmanis o Acanthite o Arsenopalladinite o Bustamite o Clinohumite o Enstatite o Harmotome o Actinolite o Arsenopyrite o Bytownite o Clinoptilolite o Epidesmine (Stilbite) o Hastingsite o Adularia o Arsenosulvanite (Plagioclase) o Clinozoisite o Epidote o Hausmannite (Orthoclase) o Arsenpolybasite o Cairngorm (Quartz) o Cobaltite o Epistilbite o Hedenbergite o Aegirine o Astrophyllite o Calamine o Cochromite o Epsomite o Hedleyite o Aenigmatite o Atacamite (Hemimorphite) o Coffinite o Erionite o Hematite o Aeschynite o Atokite o Calaverite o Columbite o Erythrite o Hemimorphite o Agardite-Y o Augite o Calciohilairite (Ferrocolumbite) o Euchroite o Hercynite o Agate (Quartz) o Aurostibite o Calcite, see also o Conichalcite o Euxenite o Hessite o Aguilarite o Austinite Manganocalcite o Connellite o Euxenite-Y o Heulandite o Aktashite o Onyx o Copiapite o o Autunite o Fairchildite Hexahydrite o Alabandite o Caledonite o Copper o o Awaruite o Famatinite Hibschite o Albite o Cancrinite o Copper-zinc o o Axinite group o Fayalite Hillebrandite o Algodonite o Carnelian (Quartz) o Coquandite o o Azurite o Feldspar group Hisingerite o Allanite o Cassiterite o Cordierite o o Barite o Ferberite Hongshiite o Allanite-Ce o Catapleiite o Corrensite o o Bastnäsite
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovery of the Elements — a Historical Sketch of the Discoveries
    REDISCOVERY OF THE ELEMENTS — A HISTORICAL SKETCH OF THE DISCOVERIES TABLE OF CONTENTS incantations. The ancient Greeks were the first to Introduction ........................1 address the question of what these principles 1. The Ancients .....................3 might be. Water was the obvious basic 2. The Alchemists ...................9 essence, and Aristotle expanded the Greek 3. The Miners ......................14 philosophy to encompass a obscure mixture of 4. Lavoisier and Phlogiston ...........23 four elements — fire, earth, water, and air — 5. Halogens from Salts ...............30 as being responsible for the makeup of all 6. Humphry Davy and the Voltaic Pile ..35 materials of the earth. As late as 1777, scien- 7. Using Davy's Metals ..............41 tific texts embraced these four elements, even 8. Platinum and the Noble Metals ......46 though a over-whelming body of evidence 9. The Periodic Table ................52 pointed out many contradictions. It was taking 10. The Bunsen Burner Shows its Colors 57 thousands of years for mankind to evolve his 11. The Rare Earths .................61 thinking from Principles — which were 12. The Inert Gases .................68 ethereal notions describing the perceptions of 13. The Radioactive Elements .........73 this material world — to Elements — real, 14. Moseley and Atomic Numbers .....81 concrete basic stuff of this universe. 15. The Artificial Elements ...........85 The alchemists, who devoted untold Epilogue ..........................94 grueling hours to transmute metals into gold, Figs. 1-3. Mendeleev's Periodic Tables 95-97 believed that in addition to the four Aristo- Fig. 4. Brauner's 1902 Periodic Table ...98 telian elements, two principles gave rise to all Fig. 5. Periodic Table, 1925 ...........99 natural substances: mercury and sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Conversion Factors
    Standard conversion factors 7 1 tonne of oil equivalent (toe) = 10 kilocalories = 396.83 therms = 41.868 GJ = 11,630 kWh 1 therm = 100,000 British thermal units (Btu) The following prefixes are used for multiples of joules, watts and watt hours: kilo (k) = 1,000 or 103 mega (M) = 1,000,000 or 106 giga (G) = 1,000,000,000 or 109 tera (T) = 1,000,000,000,000 or 1012 peta (P) = 1,000,000,000,000,000 or 1015 WEIGHT 1 kilogramme (kg) = 2.2046 pounds (lb) VOLUME 1 cubic metre (cu m) = 35.31 cu ft 1 pound (lb) = 0.4536 kg 1 cubic foot (cu ft) = 0.02832 cu m 1 tonne (t) = 1,000 kg 1 litre = 0.22 Imperial = 0.9842 long ton gallon (UK gal.) = 1.102 short ton (sh tn) 1 UK gallon = 8 UK pints 1 Statute or long ton = 2,240 lb = 1.201 U.S. gallons (US gal) = 1.016 t = 4.54609 litres = 1.120 sh tn 1 barrel = 159.0 litres = 34.97 UK gal = 42 US gal LENGTH 1 mile = 1.6093 kilometres 1 kilometre (km) = 0.62137 miles TEMPERATURE 1 scale degree Celsius (C) = 1.8 scale degrees Fahrenheit (F) For conversion of temperatures: °C = 5/9 (°F - 32); °F = 9/5 °C + 32 Average conversion factors for petroleum Imperial Litres Imperial Litres gallons per gallons per per tonne tonne per tonne tonne Crude oil: Gas/diesel oil: Indigenous Gas oil 257 1,167 Imported Marine diesel oil 253 1,150 Average of refining throughput Fuel oil: Ethane All grades 222 1,021 Propane Light fuel oil: Butane 1% or less sulphur 1,071 Naphtha (l.d.f.) >1% sulphur 232 1,071 Medium fuel oil: Aviation gasoline 1% or less sulphur 237 1,079 >1% sulphur 1,028 Motor
    [Show full text]
  • American and BRITISH UNITS of Measurement to SI UNITS
    AMERICAN AND BRITISH UNITS OF MEASUREMENT TO SI UNITS UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNITS OF LENGTH UNITS OF MASS 1 inch = 40 lines in 2.54 cm 0.393701 1 grain gr 64.7989 mg 0.0154324 1 mil 25.4 µm 0.03937 1 dram dr 1.77185 g 0.564383 1 line 0.635 mm 1.57480 1 ounce = 16 drams oz 28.3495 g 0.0352739 1 foot = 12 in = 3 hands ft 30.48 cm 0.0328084 1 pound = 16 oz lb 0.453592 kg 2.204622 1 yard = 3 feet = 4 spans yd 0.9144 m 1.09361 1 quarter = 28 lb 12.7006 kg 0.078737 1 fathom = 2 yd fath 1.8288 m 0.546807 1 hundredweight = 112 lb cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 rod (perch, pole) rd 5.0292 m 0.198839 1 long hundredweight l cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 chain = 100 links ch 20.1168 m 0.0497097 1 short hundredweight sh cwt 45.3592 kg 0.0220462 1 furlong = 220 yd fur 0.201168 km 4.97097 1 ton = 1 long ton tn, l tn 1.016047 t 0.984206 1 mile (Land Mile) mi 1.60934 km 0.62137 1 short ton = 2000 lb sh tn 0.907185 t 1.102311 1 nautical mile (intl.) n mi, NM 1.852 km 0.539957 1 knot (Knoten) kn 1.852 km/h 0.539957 UNITS OF FORCE 1 pound-weight lb wt 4.448221 N 0.2248089 UNITS OF AREA 1 pound-force LB, lbf 4.448221 N 0.2248089 1 square inch sq in 6.4516 cm2 0.155000 1 poundal pdl 0.138255 N 7.23301 1 circular inch 5.0671 cm2 0.197352 1 kilogram-force kgf, kgp 9.80665 N 0.1019716 1 square foot = 144 sq in sq ft 929.03 cm2 1.0764 x 10-4 1 short ton-weight sh tn wt 8.896444 kN 0.1124045 1 square yard = 9 sq ft sq yd 0.83613 m2 1.19599 1 long ton-weight l tn wt 9.964015 kN 0.1003611 1 acre = 4 roods 4046.8
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Characterization of Lif Single-Crystal Fibers by the Micro
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Crystal Growth 270 (2004) 121–123 Growth and characterization of LiF single-crystal fibers by the micro-pulling-down method A.M.E. Santoa, B.M. Epelbaumb, S.P. Moratoc, N.D. Vieira Jr.a, S.L. Baldochia,* a Instituto de Pesquisas Energeticas! e Nucleares, IPEN-CNEN/SP, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, CEP 05508-900, Sao* Paulo, SP, Brazil b Department of Materials Science, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany c LaserTools Tecnologia Ltda., 05379-130,Sao* Paulo, SP, Brazil Accepted 27 May 2004 Available online 20 July 2004 Communicated by G. Muller. Abstract Good optical quality LiF single-crystalline fibers ranging from 0:5to0:8 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length were successfully grown by the micro-pulling-down technique in the resistive mode. A commercial equipment was modified in order to achieve suitable conditions to grow fluoride single-crystalline fibers. r 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. PACS: 81.10.Fq; 78.20.Àe Keywords: A2. Micro-pulling-down method; A2. Single crystal growth; B1. Fluorides 1. Introduction oxide single-crystals have already been grown by the laser heated pedestal growth (LHPG) [2] and There is an increasinginterest in the production by the micro-pulling-down (m-PD) [3] methods. of single-crystalline fibers. Their unique properties However, the growth and hence the possible indicate their use for production of a variety of applications of fluoride single-crystalline fibers optical and electronic devices [1]. The final shape has not yet been investigated. of the single-crystalline fiber is already in a form As it is already known from other methods of suitable for optical testingand applications, fluoride growth, these materials are very sensitive reducingthe time and cost of preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hafnium Review Awaiting the Nuclear Renaissance
    Monday, August 17, 2020 Hallgarten & Company Sector Review Christopher Ecclestone [email protected] Hafnium Review Awaiting the Nuclear Renaissance The Hafnium Wannabes Strategy Ticker Market Cap Project Country Developers Australian Strategic Materials Hold ASM.ax AUD$128mn Dubbo Australia Leading Edge Hold LEM.v CAD$21.9mn Norra Karr Sweden Search Minerals Avoid SMY.v CAD$9.3mn Foxtrot Canada Texas Mineral Resources Avoid TMRC US$123mn Round Top USA Hallgarten & Company (44) 795 08 53 621 Monday, August 17, 2020 Hafnium Review Awaiting the Nuclear Renaissance + Hafnium (Hf) has become a metal that is discussed more often, principally as a by-product credit by developers of Rare Earth deposits where it appears as an accessory mineral + Hf is joined at the hip with Zirconium and there is little prospect of developing one without the other, fortunately there is good demand for Zr at current times + The burgeoning construction of nuclear power stations in China promises stronger demand for Hf from its uses in such facilities + The production of HF is currently dominated by the US and France, with China having limited influence (thus far) The Hafnium price has been bouncing along the bottom for years with little sign of recuperation on the horizon Two projects that have cited Hafnium resources, DZP and Silver Fox, are burdened by massive capex (the former) and little prospect of getting to production (the latter) Financing of projects remains very difficult and almost inevitably requires a committed offtaker The Highest of High Tech Usages The metal we shall look at here is obscure even compared to others we have covered in recent times.
    [Show full text]
  • Inorganic Chemistry for Dummies® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc
    Inorganic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry by Michael L. Matson and Alvin W. Orbaek Inorganic Chemistry For Dummies® Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley. com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, the Wiley logo, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, A Reference for the Rest of Us!, The Dummies Way, Dummies Daily, The Fun and Easy Way, Dummies.com, Making Everything Easier, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. All other trade- marks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Platinum Group Metals Patent Analysis and Mapping a REVIEW of PATENTING TRENDS and IDENTIFICATION of EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
    DOI: 10.1595/147106708X362735 Platinum Group Metals Patent Analysis and Mapping A REVIEW OF PATENTING TRENDS AND IDENTIFICATION OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES By Richard Seymour Johnson Matthey Technology Centre, Blounts Court, Sonning Common, Reading RG4 9NH, U.K.; E-mail: [email protected] The patent literature contains a wealth of detailed information about existing and new uses for the platinum group metals (pgms). While excellent searching tools have existed for many years for identifying patents relating to specific topics, it is only relatively recently that it has been feasible to map the complete archive of patent literature to identify important trends relating to potential new applications. This paper summarises the results of such an exercise for the pgms carried out in early 2008 and shows that one such ‘hot spot’ relates to organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). Previous articles in this Journal have described Matthey Technology Centre is Aureka® (a product the importance of patents as a key source of techni- available from Thomson Reuters) (3), which cal and commercial intelligence (1, 2). The use of includes patent data sets from the Patent patent mapping to visualise large sets of patent data Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and European Patent and to identify trends contained within that data has offices, plus a range of national patent collections also been demonstrated (2). The present paper fur- including those of the U.S.A., Japan, the U.K., ther develops these themes by examining the patent France and Germany. With the exception of Japan, literature on pgms published since 1983, in particu- these collections contain full-text patent docu- lar that on the minor metals iridium and ruthenium.
    [Show full text]
  • ~Ui&£R5itt! of J\Rij!Oua
    Minerals and metals of increasing interest, rare and radioactive minerals Authors Moore, R.T. Rights Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved. Download date 06/10/2021 17:57:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/629904 Vol. XXIV, No.4 October, 1953 ~ui&£r5itt! of J\rij!oua ~ul1etiu ARIZONA BUREAU OF MINES MINERALS AND METALS OF INCREASING INTEREST RARE AND RADIOACTIVE MINERALS By RICHARD T. MOORE ARIZONA BUREAU OF MINES MINERAL TECHNOLOGY SERIES No. 47 BULLETIN No. 163 THIRTY CENTS (Free to Residents of Arizona) PUBLISHED BY ~tti£ll~r5itt! of ~rh!Omt TUCSON, ARIZONA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Acknowledgments 5 General Features 5 BERYLLIUM 7 General Features 7 Beryllium Minerals 7 Beryl 7 Phenacite 8 Gadolinite 8 Helvite 8 Occurrence 8 Prices and Possible Buyers ,........................................ 8 LITHIUM 9 General Features 9 Lithium Minerals 9 Amblygonite 9 Spodumene 10 Lepidolite 10 Triphylite 10 Zinnwaldite 10 Occurrence 10 Prices and Possible Buyers 10 CESIUM AND RUBIDIUM 11 General Features 11 Cesium and Rubidium Minerals 11 Pollucite ..................•.........................................................................., 11 Occurrence 12 Prices and Producers 12 TITANIUM 12 General Features 12 Titanium Minerals 13 Rutile 13 Ilmenite 13 Sphene 13 Occurrence 13 Prices and Buyers 14 GALLIUM, GERMANIUM, INDIUM, AND THALLIUM 14 General Features 14 Gallium, Germanium, Indium and Thallium Minerals 15 Germanite 15 Lorandite 15 Hutchinsonite : 15 Vrbaite 15 Occurrence 15 Prices and Producers ~ 16 RHENIUM 16
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW: Swiss Fund CDMR Argues Investment Case for Minor Metals
    INTERVIEW: Swiss fund CDMR argues investment case for minor metals LONDON (Metal-Pages) 15-Apr-15. While investment funds speculating in base metals are a fairly routine occurrence, those same funds rarely get involved with minor metals or rare earths. If they do, they tend to hold an equity stake in the mining companies rather than in the actual metal. Over the years some smaller funds and hedge funds have made forays into minor metals but those kind of speculative investors are still few and far between. One of them is the Swiss firm Compagnie des Métaux Rares. It operates a Luxembourg-based fund with a stake in physical minor metals, holding 12 metals in warehouses in Rotterdam. CDMR was set up by Vincent Donnen and Gregoire Teze, two former fund analysts with extensive experience of working in Asia, who took it off the ground with $1mn of their own money and another $4mn raised from their network. Now they are looking to attract a total of $20mn to $25mn into the fund which has been operational since last April. The attraction of minor metals, explains Donnen, stems from the fact that the majority of them are currently undervalued and yet demand from the industries which used them such as electronics, car manufacturing or aircraft building is on the rise. At the same time most of these metals are not produced on their own but rather as a by-product of base and precious metals such as copper, nickel or platinum. Aircraft manufacture, electronics and clean energy will drive minor metal demand Some of Donnen’s top choices include rhenium, a popular metal in aircraft building, rhodium and ruthenium, both used in catalytic converters in cars, tellurium and several metals used in electronics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decomposition Analysis of Base Metal Prices: Comparing the Effect of Detrending Methods on Trend Identification and Cyclical Components
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2013 A DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS OF BASE METAL PRICES: COMPARING THE EFFECT OF DETRENDING METHODS ON TREND IDENTIFICATION AND CYCLICAL COMPONENTS Mahmoodreza Modirroosta Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Economics Commons Copyright 2013 Mahmoodreza Modirroosta Recommended Citation Modirroosta, Mahmoodreza, "A DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS OF BASE METAL PRICES: COMPARING THE EFFECT OF DETRENDING METHODS ON TREND IDENTIFICATION AND CYCLICAL COMPONENTS", Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2013. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/674 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Economics Commons A DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS OF BASE METAL PRICES: COMPARING THE EFFECT OF DETRENDING METHODS ON TREND IDENTIFICATION AND CYCLICAL COMPONENTS By Mahmoodreza Modirroosta A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Applied Natural Resource Economics MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2013 © Mahmoodreza Modirroosta This thesis has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Applied Natural Resource Economics School of Business and Economics Thesis Advisor: Dr. Mark Roberts Committee Member: Dr. Xavier de Castro Oliveira Committee Member: Dr. Seyyedmohsen
    [Show full text]