Emerging Powers: India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) and the Future of South-South Cooperation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emerging Powers: India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) and the Future of South-South Cooperation AUGUST 2009 SPECIAL REPORT EMERGING POWERS: INDIA, BRAZIL AND SOUTH AFRICA (IBSA) AND THE FUTURE OF SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION INTRODUCTION Paulo Sotero, Director Brazil Institute, Woodrow Wilson Center India, Brazil, and South Africa (IBSA) are transcending geographical, historical, and regional differences in order to promote their individual and collective interests at a time when the current economic hardship and declining U.S. hegemony mean greater opportunities for emerging countries in the global South. Since its inception at the margins of the expanded G-8 Summit held in Evian, France, in 2003, the group, officially established in 2004 as the IBSA Dialogue Forum, has held three Summits – in Brasília in 2006, in Pretoria in 2007, and in New Delhi in 2008. The three foreign ministers have met at least once a year and a num- ber of trilateral official consultations have taken place at lower levels. The IBSA Forum has also facilitated interaction amongst Indian, South African and Brazilian academics, business leaders, and other members of civil society. Despite IBSA’s contributions to the future of multilateralism, it continues to face profound challenges in distinguishing itself from other similar groupings. The proliferation of regional organizations in the post-cold war era begs the question: “What makes IBSA unique, what has it achieved in its first five years of existence, and what is its future?” On May 22, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars’ Brazil Institute, Africa Program, and Asia Program jointly welcomed politicians and scholars from the IBSA countries to discuss these questions and the implications of IBSA coop- eration for its member countries and the greater developing world. The informal nature of the IBSA dialogue forum and the fact that it lacks a permanent secretariat mean many unprecedented factors are at work in encouraging trilateral coopera- tion among these distant regional powers. The panelists pointed to similarities between the countries as providing explanations for IBSA’s existence and agenda. India, South Africa, Emerging Powers: India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) and the Future of South-South Cooperation SPECIAL REPORT and Brazil are all democratic states that exert sig- standing interests of the developed world - by nificant regional influence, yet all three face inter- no means an easy task -, then it is highly prob- nal social challenges typical of developing nations. able that the inter-regional IBSA alliance will in Each has demonstrated its capacity to act beyond turn become stronger and better able to achieve its its national and regional interests and all three dis- goals. In the meantime, IBSA, as an alliance of three play a growing willingness to assert their presence highly diverse democratic societies, might best be and increase their participation in global affairs. viewed as a laboratory for exploring the future of Beyond the similarities between member coun- democracy and international cooperation in the tries, the grouping is in many ways a product of Global South. historical circumstance. An inter-regional alliance On the key issue of trade, the group has evolved between Brazil, India, and South Africa would have at a time when trading of goods and services been neither relevant nor possible ten years ago between the three countries was rapidly expand- when Brazil was perceived as an economic disas- ing. “There has been a quantitative leap in intra- ter dealing with rampant inflation and the pains IBSA trade, which is particularly dramatic between of a recent democratic transition, South Africa was India and Brazil and India and South Africa,” coming out of apartheid, and India was address- the United Nations Conference on Trade and ing regional nuclear threats. Today, regional activi- Development (UNCTAD) reported in a 2006 ties are necessary but not sufficient to advance a paper titled “IBSA: An emerging trinity in the new national agenda. A trans-regional grouping such as geography of international trade.” The UNCTAD IBSA allows for sharing of best practices between analysis concluded that the “growing dynamo the three member countries and strengthens the role [of India, South Africa and Brazil coopera- voice of the developing world as a whole. tion] in intra-regional and inter-regional South- IBSA fashioned a three-pillar approach to South trade in general augurs well for IBSA trade advance the agendas of its member countries and and economic cooperation and for each country the larger developing world. The first component using the other partner as a gateway for intensify- of IBSA’s three-pillar approach is providing a forum ing inter-continental trade and investment links.” for consultation and coordination on significant Indeed, from a mere $200 million in 1998 and political issues, such as the reform of the United $800 in 2002, Indo-Brazil trade reached $2.5 Nations and its Security Council, and negotiations billion in 2005 and $3.1 in 2007. India-South at the World Trade Organization. The second pil- Africa trade similarly expanded to $4 billion in lar fosters trilateral cooperation on particular areas 2005 before loosing ground and receding to $2.3 and projects through sixteen working groups set in 2007. South Africa-Brazil trade has remained up for the common benefit of the three countries. unchanged at around $1.5 billion from 2004 to The final pillar broadens IBSA’s scope to the larger 2007. These pre-global crisis data show, however, developing world through the IBSA facility fund, that IBSA had yet to achieve the $10 billion tar- established in 2004. The fund, managed by the get of intra-trade it set for its three members. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP), UNCTAD paper suggested that “the numbers do allows the IBSA countries to initiate and finance not fully reflect trade in service or the quantum poverty reduction projects in other developing of trade between them through third countries, countries nor do they factor in the major FDI proposals If IBSA countries succeed in asserting more and joint ventures on the anvil or even in some regional power in a way that appeals to longer- cases the services trade that is taking place.” 2 SPECIAL REPORT On the more complex issues of international and current economics involves a more generaliz- trade policy, the IBSA Dialogue Forum has yet ing and connecting process. What the experiences to bring its members’ positions closer together. of the IBSA countries offer is a testament to the Brazilian scholars Taiane Campos and Luciana Las interplay between economic, social and political Casas see this as an elusive proposition. “The trade forces, as all three countries are increasingly inte- policies of Brazil, India and South Africa have sig- grated into the global community while retaining nificant historical similarities: these countries are original WTO members; they adopted import- substitution industrialization; promoted neo-liberal IBSA, AS AN ALLIANCE OF reforms; have been playing important roles in their regional contexts; and, more recently, they have THREE HIGHLY DIVERSE also formed alliances and coalitions (IBSA, G20) in order to increase their capacity to influence the DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES, trade regime,” they wrote in a paper presented ear- lier this year in an international conference. MIGHT BEST BE VIEWED “At the same time, they are intensifying bilat- eral and regional ties, which are different in scope AS A LABORATORY and degrees of institutionalization. The result is that, despite having similar roles which are derived from FOR EXPLORING THE their status as middle powers, these three countries have developed different strategies concerning their FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY trade policy.” Differences between Brazil and India regarding trade in agriculture remain a factor in the AND INTERNATIONAL so far unsuccessful negotiations of the Doha Round at the WTO. COOpeRATION IN THE The conflicting national and global interests of each IBSA country affect not just international GLOBAL SOUTH trade policy; it also affects the way the three coun- tries relate to other nations although similar his- torical and geographical considerations, and their much of their singularly distinct national identities. common status as developing countries lead the Developed and developing countries alike would be IBSA countries to converge on many foreign policy well served to examine why democracy has taken issues, each country nonetheless maintains its own root in such diverse societies as those comprising approach to the international community. India, IBSA, and how the IBSA countries, collectively and for instance, has been more willing than Brazil to individually, set examples for other democratizing engage with the United States in a substantive stra- countries throughout the world. tegic partnership. This report is the product of a collective effort The three countries’ national experiences in of three programs of the Wilson Center. Howard recent decades also demonstrate that there is no Wolpe, the director of the Africa Program at the time “cookie-cutter” approach to democracy. It is a of the conference, moderated its first panel. He was localizing force that evokes and plays to particu- a key supporter of the project alongside the Africa lar identities. At the same time, market expansion Program Consulting Manager Steven McDonald. 3 Emerging Powers: India, Brazil and South Africa (IBSA) and the Future of South-South Cooperation SPECIAL REPORT Africa Program Associate Mame-Khady Diouf, and countries.
Recommended publications
  • Foreign Relations of India from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Foreign relations of India From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia India has formal diplomatic relations with most nations; it is the world's second most populous country, the Navigation Republic of India world's most-populous democracy and one of the fastest growing major economies.[1] With the world's seventh Main page largest military expenditure,[2] ninth largest economy by nominal rates and third largest by purchasing power Contents parity, India is a regional power,[3] a nascent great power and a potential superpower. India's growing Featured content international influence gives it a prominent voice in global affairs. Current events India is a newly industrialized country, it has a long history of collaboration with several countries and is Random article considered a leader of the developing world.[4][5] India was one of the founding members of several international Donate to Wikipedia organizations, most notably the United Nations, the Asian Development Bank, G20 industrial nations and the founder of the Non-aligned movement. India has also played an important and influential role in other Interaction international organizations like East Asia Summit,[6] World Trade Organization,[7] International Monetary Fund (IMF),[8] G8+5[9] and IBSA Dialogue Forum.[10] Regionally, India is a part of SAARC and BIMSTEC. India has Help taken part in several UN peacekeeping missions and in 2007, it was the second-largest troop contributor to the About Wikipedia United Nations.[11] India
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union and New Leading Powers: Towards Partnership in Strategic Trade Policy Areas
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 32, Issue 2 2008 Article 1 The European Union and New Leading Powers: Towards Partnership in Strategic Trade Policy Areas Dr. Rafael Leal-Arcas∗ ∗ Copyright c 2008 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The European Union and New Leading Powers: Towards Partnership in Strategic Trade Policy Areas Dr. Rafael Leal-Arcas Abstract This Article aims at understanding the potential of partnerships of the European Union (‘EU‘) with emergent global actors (the so-called new leading powers (‘NLPs‘) or ‘BRIC countries‘), focusing on international trade law and policy. Although the power base of these actors (Brazil, Russia, India, and China–the BRIC countries) is their respective region (South America for the case of Brazil, Eastern Europe for Russia, the Subcontinent for India, and the Far East for China), there may be specific policy areas in which their influence might be global. With this in mind, the Article raises interesting questions: Is the EU an attractive trade partner for the new leading powers? Does the EU want cooperation with the BRIC countries? What can the EU expect from cooperation with the BRIC countries? What are the characteristics of these partners? What are the EU’s priorities in its foreign trade policy? With which partners should the EU cooperate in which policy areas? With which instruments can the EU engage these partners and how can internal coordination within the EU be ensured? ARTICLES THE EUROPEAN UNION AND NEW LEADING POWERS: TOWARDS PARTNERSHIP IN STRATEGIC TRADE POLICY AREAS* Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • India: Latin America's Next Big Thing? Making Perspective.” Latin America's Next Big Thing?
    INTEGRATION AND TRADE “This book makes an unprecedented contribution to understanding the past, present, and possible futures of economic relations between Latin America and India. Will these relations follow the same path taken by Latin America and China? If not, how might they differ? Using solid knowledge of economic history, hard-to-get data, and sound comparative analysis, the authors shed light on challenges that will be faced in India: coming years to intensify these relations, arguing that eventual success can be a win-win proposition. A book worth reading from both an academic and a policy- India: Latin America's Next Big Thing? making perspective.” Latin America's Next Big Thing? Fernando Henrique Cardoso, President of the Fernando Henrique Cardoso Institute Mauricio Mesquita Moreira (IFHC), Former President of Brazil Coordinator "India and Latin America are increasingly important actors on the global economic stage. Yet in terms of their engagement with each other, they could be likened to two giant ships passing in the night. India: Latin America's next big thing? poses a highly pertinent question and explains why the answer may well be affirmative sooner than we might guess. Thoroughly researched and clearly presented, this study examines C the major economic questions facing India and Latin America. By elucidating the M uneven and sequentially eccentric development paths both have taken, the study Y asks how their growing interaction could benefit each. A very useful source for CM economists and non-economists alike interested
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the SSE Landscape in India and Brazil Through South-South and Triangular Cooperation
    Mapping the SSE Landscape in India and Brazil through South-South and Triangular Cooperation: Gender-Based Initiatives in Social and Solidarity Economy By Anup Dash and Leandro Morais Research Coordinated by: Anita Amorim Emerging and Special Partnerships Unit Partnerships and Field Support ILO, Geneva December 2015 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2016 First published 2015 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ISBN numbers: 978-92-2-131201-7 (print) 978-92-2-131202-4 (web pdf) ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing of Social Sectors Experiences in IBSA: Assessment of Initiatives and Way Forward
    A Think-Tank RIS Discussion Papers RIS of Developing Countries Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS) is a New Delhi–based autonomous policy research institute that specialises Sharing of Social Sectors Experiences in IBSA: in issues related to international economic development, trade, Assessment of Initiatives and Way Forward investment and technology. RIS is envisioned as a forum for fostering effective policy dialogue and capacity-building among developing Beena Pandey countries on global and regional economic issues. The focus of the work programme of RIS is to promote South-South Cooperation and collaborate with developing countries in multilateral negotiations in various forums. RIS is engaged across inter-governmental processes of several regional economic cooperation initiatives. Through Discussion Paper # 201 its intensive network of think tanks, RIS seeks to strengthen policy coherence on international economic issues and the development partnership canvas. For more information about RIS and its work programme, please visit its website: www.ris.org.in Policy research to shape the international development agenda RIS Research and Information System for Developing Countries RIS Research and Information System Core IV-B, Fourth Floor, India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110 003, India. for Developing Countries Ph. 91-11-2468 2177-80, Fax: 91-11-2468 2173-74-75 Email: [email protected], Website: http://www.ris.org.in Sharing of Social Sectors Experiences in IBSA: Assessment of Initiatives and Way Forward Beena Pandey RIS-DP # 201 January 2016 Core IV-B, Fourth Floor, India Habitat Centre Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003 (India) Tel: +91-11-2468 2177/2180; Fax: +91-11-2468 2173/74 Email: [email protected] RIS Discussion Papers intend to disseminate preliminary findings of the research carried out within the framework of institute’s work programme or related research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging Economies and Climate Change
    SHIFTING POWER Critical perspectives on emerging economies TNI WORKING PAPERS THE EMERGING ECONOMIES AND CLIMATE CHANGE A CASE STUDY OF THE BASIC GROUPING PRAFUL BIDWAI The Emerging Economies and Climate Change: A case study of the BASIC grouping PRAFUL BIDWAI* Among the most dramatic and far-reaching geopolitical developments of the post-Cold War era is the shift in the locus of global power away from the West with the simultaneous emergence as major powers of former colonies and other countries in the South, which were long on the periphery of international capi- talism. As they clock rapid GDP growth, these “emerging economies” are trying to assert their new identities and interests in a variety of ways. These include a demand for reforming the structures of global governance and the United Nations system (especially the Security Council) and the formation of new plurilateral blocs and associations among nations which seek to challenge or counterbalance existing patterns of dominance in world economic and political affairs. BASIC, made up of Brazil, South Africa, India and China, which acts as a bloc in the negotiations under the auspices of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), is perhaps the most sharply focused of all these groupings. Beginning with the Copenhagen climate summit of 2009, BASIC has played a major role in shaping the negotiations which were meant to, but have failed to, reach an agreement on cooperative climate actions and obligations on the part of different countries and country-groups to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These emissions, warn scientists, are dangerously warming up the Earth and causing irreversible changes in the world’s climate system.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations of Latin America and the Caribbean with India: a Window of Opportunity
    Relations of Latin America and the Caribbean with India: A window of opportunity Extra-Regional Relations Regional Meeting on economic and trade relations of Latin America and the Caribbean with nations of the Pacific, India and Africa Caracas, Venezuela 9 and 10 October 2014 SP/RRRECALCPIA/DT N° 2-14 Copyright © SELA, October 2014. All rights reserved. Printed in the Permanent Secretariat of SELA, Caracas, Venezuela. The Press and Publications Department of the Permanent Secretariat of SELA must authorise reproduction of this document, whether totally or partially, through [email protected]. The Member States and their government institutions may reproduce this document without prior authorisation, provided that the source is mentioned and the Secretariat is aware of said reproduction. Relations of Latin America and the Caribbean with India: SP/RRRECALCPIA/DT N° 2-14 A window of opportunity C O N T E N T S FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 1. Background 6 2. India within the international context 6 3. India’s basic profile: Territory, population and income 7 4. India’s economy and competitiveness 9 I. RELATIONS BETWEEN INDIA AND LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN 14 II. TRADE AND INVESTMENT 16 1. India’s international trade 17 2. Doha Round negotiations: Areas of common interest 21 3. Imports 26 4. Exports 27 5. Investment 28 III. INDIA’S INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 32 1. Coincidences in regional and multilateral organizations 32 2. Education and Innovation 38 3. SMEs 39 4. Tourism and transport 39 5. Environment and energy 40 IV. AREAS OF OPPORTUNITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 1. Economic-trade area 42 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the BRICS Summit Solid, Strengthening Success1
    Explaining the BRICS Summit Solid, Strengthening Success1 John J. Kirton John J. Kirton —Professor, co-director, BRICS Research Group, co-director, G20 Research Group, director, G8 Research Group, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, 1 Devonshire Place, Room 209N, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3K7, Canada; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The BRICS have emerged as a solid, increasingly comprehensive, cooperative success, both alone and within the G20, on behalf of all emerging countries, as demonstrated by its summit performance since its start on the margins of the G8’s Hokkaido Summit in 2008 through to its gathering at the G20’s Brisbane Summit in 2014. This success is due primarily to the failure of the other international institutions from the 1944–45 and 1975 generations to give the leading emerging powers an equal, effective place and thus to solve the new, compounding global financial crisis and other challenges arising since 2008. The BRICS is a plurilateral summit institution growing in its level, membership, agenda and interaction intensity, with its summit performance rising substantially across an increasing array of major dimensions of global summit governance. This performance has been driven somewhat by the global financial, economic and food shocks since 2008, but primarily by the failure of the multilateral organizations from the 1940s, the G8-plus process from 2003 to 2009 and the first two G20 summits to give the big emerging powers the equal role, rights, responsibilities and effective influence warranted by their rising relative capability and international openness and needed to solve the new challenges of an intensely interconnected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Itcdtab36 En.Pdf
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND COMMODITIES STUDY SERIES No. 35 IBSA: AN EMERGING TRINITY IN THE NEW GEOGRAPHY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE by Lakshmi Puri Director of Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, UNCTAD UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 NOTE The purpose of this series of studies is to analyse policy issues and to stimulate discussions in the area of international trade and development. This series includes studies by UNCTAD staff, as well as by distinguished researchers from academia. In keeping with the objective of the series, authors are encouraged to express their own views, which do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a reference to the document number. It would be appreciated if a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint were sent to the UNCTAD secretariat: Chief Trade Analysis Branch Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva UNCTAD/ITCD/TAB/36 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION ISSN 1607-8291 © Copyright United Nations 2007 All rights reserved ii ABSTRACT This paper explores the opportunities for further economic cooperation between India, Brazil and South Africa in the context of the IBSA Trilateral Cooperation Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for IPC Internship Programme
    United Nations Development Programme International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth Poverty Practice, Bureau for Development Policy Invitation: Online debate on India-Brazil- South Africa (IBSA) Policy Dialogue Forum In partnership with the Ideas for Development blog, the International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) is launching an online debate that will contribute with inputs for the forthcoming IBSA Academic Forum, which will be hosted by IPC-IG on 12-13 April in Brasilia, Brazil. We invite you to participate in this discussion and reflect about the following issues: - What is the role of the emerging countries in shaping world politics? - How can India, Brazil and South Africa strengthen cooperation in key issues on the global agenda? - In which ways an improved policy dialogue among developing countries can contribute to the implementation of effective policies towards the achievement of inclusive growth and human development? Join us at: http://www.ideas4development.org We also invite you to visit the IBSA Academic Forum website, where you can find interesting papers, resources and breaking news. Visit: http://www.ipc-undp.org/ipc/HomeIBSA.do Media and Press support Mr. Francisco Filho and Ms. Mariana Hoffmann Communications, Outreach and Advocacy Unit, IPC-IG Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Telephone: (+ 55 61) 2105 5036 or 2105 5022 About IPC-IG: The International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG) is a partnership between the Poverty Practice of the Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP and the Government of Brazil. Located in Brasilia, IPC-IG facilitates South-South learning with the aim of expanding developing countries’ knowledge and capacities to design, implement and evaluate effective policies towards the attainment of high inclusive growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Papers Analysis of the Role of South-South
    RESEARCH PAPERS 14 ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION TO PROMOTE GOVERNANCE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND DEVELOPMENT ∗ Ermias Tekeste Biadgleng SOUTH CENTRE DECEMBER 2007 ∗ Ermias Tekeste Biadgleng is currently a Programme Officer in the Innovation and Access to Knowledge Programme of the South Centre. He holds an LLM in International Trade and Investment Law from the University of Western Cape and the American University Washington College of Law (2003). The views expressed in this paper are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the South Centre or its Member States. THE SOUTH CENTRE In August 1995 the South Centre was established as a permanent inter- governmental organization of developing countries. In pursuing its objectives of promoting South solidarity, South-South cooperation, and coordinated participation by developing countries in international forums, the South Centre has full intellectual independence. It prepares, publishes and distributes information, strategic analyses and recommendations on international economic, social and political matters of concern to the South. The South Centre enjoys support and cooperation from the governments of the countries of the South and is in regular working contact with the Non-Aligned Movement and the Group of 77. The Centre’s studies and position papers are prepared by drawing on the technical and intellectual capacities existing within South governments and institutions and among individuals of the South. Through working group sessions and wide consultations, which involve experts from different parts of the South, and sometimes from the North, common problems of the South are studied and experience and knowledge are shared.
    [Show full text]
  • National Institute of Diplomacy
    www.diplomacy.net.in NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIPLOMACY New Delhi This website titled www.diplomcy.net.in is the official website of the National Institute of Diplomacy (NID) established in the year 1985 and inaugurated by the then Union Minister for External Affairs Shri Bali Ram Bhagat on 14 November 1985 on the auspicious occasion of the Birth Anniversary of the First Prime Minister of India. 1 The External Affairs Minister of India, Shri Bali Ram Bhagat inaugurating the National Institute of Diplomacy (NID) on 14 th November 1985. The main activities of National Institute of Diplomacy (NID) since its inception has been based on studies, training and research for understanding the relationships among all countries and the roles of the States, Inter-Governmental Organisations (IGOs), International Non-Governmental Organisations (INGOs), Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), and the Multi-National Corporations (MNCs). The NID endorses the view that fields of Diplomacy as well as International Relations are both an Academic as well as a Public Policy field and can be either positive or normative as it both seeks to analyse and formulate the foreign policy of the particular country. According to the NID, the fields of Diplomacy and International Relations draw upon such diverse areas as economics, history, international law, philosophy, geography, social work, sociology, anthropology, criminology, psychology, women’s studies / gender studies, and cultural studies. They involve a diverse range of issues including globalisation, state sovereignty, international security, ecological sustainability, nuclear proliferation, nationalism, economic development, global finance, terrorism, organised crime, human security, foreign interventionism and human rights. The ability to practice diplomacy is one of the defining elements of a country.
    [Show full text]