Systematics and Generic Concepts in the Lichen Family Graphidaceae

How to arrange the diversity of a tropical lichen family? : Systematics and generic concepts in the lichen family Graphidaceae

Autor(en): Staiger, Bettina

Objekttyp: Article

Zeitschrift: Archives des sciences [2004-ff.]

Band (Jahr): 58 (2005)

Heft 1

PDF erstellt am: 23.09.2021

Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-738389

Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber.

Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind.

Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch

http://www.e-periodica.ch I How fo arrange f/ie d/Vers/'fy of a frop/ca/ //c/ien fam/'/y? 15 31 How to arrange the diversity of a tropical lichen family? Systematics and generic concepts in the lichen family Graphidaceae

Bettina STAIGER^

Short introduction to lichens in general

The famous botan/'st Car/ von L/'nné considered the //'cbens to be /ust «rust/ci pauperr/m/"» - tbe poor frasb of vegetation - anc/ be d/'d not even d/st/'ngulsb fam/7/'es or genera of //'cbens but c/ass/f/'ed tbem a// /'n one genus - «//eben», Jldm/'ffed/y, most //'cbens bave ratber Inconspicuous grey/sb or green/sb fba///' but some are producing ye//ow, orange or red p/gments, and tbe var/'ab/7/'fy of tbe/'r growth forms fcrustose, fo//'ose, sbrub-//'/re or even barbe-//'/ce) and tbe/'r fruiting bodies ("round or e/ongafe, open or c/osed, exposed on podef/'a or b/'dden In tbe fba//us) /'s fascinating. /n tbe 79fb century many bofan/'sts became Interested /"n tb/'s group of organisms and started fo /'nvesf/'gate tbem In more defa/7 - sucb as tbe two famous bofan/'sts of Geneva Augusf/'n Pyramus de Cando//e and Jean /Wü//er J\rgov/ens/s. But /'f foo/r gu/'fe a /of of time unt/7 tbe/'r rea/ nature was revea/ed: /t was /'n 7869 wben S/'mon Scbwendener d/'scovered tbat //'cbens are not one organ/'sm but composed of two - a fungus and an a/gae //'v/'ng together /"n a we// organ/'sed symb/'os/"s. However severa/ decades bad fo pass before fh/'s new d/scovery was accepted by most //"cbeno/og/"sfs. The mycob/'onf ("the funga/ partner,/ /s the more dom/'nanf part of fh/s symb/'os/'s, be/'ng respons/'b/e for the growth form and be/'ng ab/e fo reproduce sexua//y wb/'/e the a/ga/ partner (pbofob/ontj /'s /ess spec/'f/'c and resfr/'efed fo vegefaf/'ve reproducf/'on. Therefore systemat/c and c/ass/'f/'cat/'on of//"cbens a/ways refer fo the funga/ partner.

Lichen systematics important characters for the lichen systematic changed considerably from time to time. Very often It was an important aim of lichenology not only to the development of new techniques lead to the dis- describe new species but also to «put in order» this covery of new characters which were considered to great variability and diversity - i. e. to develop a hier- be essential for a «modern» system. archical system. This system should reflect similarities and possible relationships between taxa. But The first lichen systems were mostly based on the soon the question arose on which characters the sys- growth form of the thallus: Crustose thalli were con- tern should be based on. If we look back in the history sidered to be less evolved («primitive»); foliose and of lichenology we see that the point of view what are shrub like thalli high evolved.

' /nsf/ftvfe of ßofaey (Jn/Ve/s/ty of Äegensburg

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCESI Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I 54 I Bettina STAIGER How fo arrange rte d/Vers/'ty of a rtop/ca/ //'crten fam/'/y? I

However some time later the fruiting body (the asco- the bark of trees as substrate, only very few are grow- carp) thus the reproductive part of the lichen came ing on rock or soil. The family Graphidaceae com- into the focus of the lichenological research. While prises more than 1000 species and the great majority first the texture or character of the margins (black, of them occur in tropical rain forests or subtropical round, with or without algae) were observed, later forests. So the tropics are the centre of diversity for also microscopic features were investigated in detail this family - and we find there a great diversity and - and for a long time spore characters were most variability of ascocarp morphology and shape: There important for the systematic of lichens. are species with fissure-like fruiting bodies having inconspicuous, pale, uncarbonised margins (Fig. 2A) At the beginning of the 20® century the chemical or species with very prominent ascocarps and black, exploration of the lichens started: The so called carbonised margins (Fig. 2B). The fruiting bodies of lichen acids and their chemical constitution were dis- other species have uncarbonised but well developed covered and had a great impact on the systematic and margins with striation (Fig. 2C), or the ascocarps are taxonomy of lichens. At the end of the last century clustering together and are located in special parts of another new character, the ascus type, came into the the thallus (so called «stromata», Fig. 2D, E, F). We focus of fungal (and lichenological) research while also find species with conspicuous red or orange during the last 5-10 years molecular genetics pro- coloured ascocarps (Fig. 2H, J) or species with more vided new tools for lichen systematic studies. or less round fruiting bodies (Fig. 21, K), a feature that Nowadays differences of DNA sequences are used to is quite uncommon within the family Graphidaceae. investigate the relationships of lichens and to recon- struct phylogenetic trees. And the question was how to arrange this great variability in a systematic order. What is a suitable natu- Each new approach led to a better understanding of ral system that reflects phylogenetic relationships the relationships between taxa and improved the cur- between taxa and how can we distinguish genera? rent phylogenetic system. Yet the perfect system still does not exist. Generic concepts in the family Graphidaceae Special part - The lichen family Graphidaceae If we look back on the early 19® century several com- peting, parallel generic concepts existed. However With this history of lichen systematic in mind I want these concepts were not very clear or concise and to focus now on my special subject, the family many lichenologists did not follow any of these but Graphidaceae. placed all species with elongate ascocarps in the Typical members of the Graphidaceae are charac- genus Grap/ris. It was finally Jean Müller Argoviensis terised by whitish to greyish crustose thalli with black, (1880, 1882) who developed a «modern» system «carbonised», elongate fruiting bodies («lirellae») based on spore characters for the Graphidaceae. This (Fig. 1). The Graphidaceae are also called «script- system was widely accepted by most lichenologists lichens» and the probably best known species is and also adopted by Zahlbruckner (1926) in Engler & GrapMs scripta. Most species of the family favour Prantls important oeuvre «Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien». Müller Argoviensis (loc. cit.) considered the spore colour and the spore septation as most important characters for the delimitation of genera. He distinguished species with hyaline (colourless) or brown spores, having transverse septa only or transverse and longitudinal septa (muriform spores). Based on these differences Müller Arg. described four main genera: Grap/ws, Grap/iiM, Ptoeograpte and PMeoprap/ima (Fig. 3). His system allows a quite easy determination of the genera but it has several drawbacks and does not fulfil the criteria for a natural system, as the fol- lowing examples will show

11. Hyaline spores may become brown when degenerating Fig. 7: Graphis duplicata, a typical member o/rte lic/ien/amily and several species have (wrongly) been placed in brown Graphidaceae, icit/i folacfc fcarbcmisedJ elowgale/mifmg bod- spored genera as degenerated spores were present in the ies, bar i mm. type specimen.

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCES I Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I How fo arrange fbe d/Vers/fy of a frop/ca/ //'eben fam/'/y? Bettina STAIGER I 55 I

ranxt.

Fig. It Ascocarp i/ariabliitg M/i/fern t/ie/amiig Grap/wdaceae. A; Fissurina dumastii; F; Platygramme australiensis; C: Acanthothecis subclavulifera; I): Sarcographa cinchonarum; F; Glyphis cicatricosa,- F: Sarcographa difformis; G: Platythecium dimorphodes; F.- Thecaria montagnei; /: Phaeographis lobata; J: Graphis chrysocarpa; F Graphis muscicola; bar 7 mm.

I 2. The presence of one additional longitudinal septum Therefore I started to study the species of the family changes the generic affiliation of species. Therefore many Graphidaceae (with main focus on the old generic species with similar or corresponding morphological names and their types) in order to develop a new, characters (but different spore septation) have been placed more natural generic system. in different genera (Fig. 4). A special emphasis was laid on the examination of morphological and anatomical characters as well as i 3. Spore based genera are inhomogeneous in respect of on the analysis of the chemical compounds. other morphological characters. Fig. 5 shows species placed in the genus Graphis - they all have hyaline transversely septate spores but differ considerably in respect of I Results and new generic concepts morphology and anatomy of the fruiting body. (Staiger 2002)

But even when these problems became evident, no In the course of my investigations several characters alternative concepts were developed and the spore turned out to be constant within species groups and based system survived for more than 100 years. so suitable for the generic delimitation e. g.:

I archives DES SCIENCES I Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I 56 I Bettina STAIGER How fo arrange fbe cZ/Vers/'ty of a tropica/ //'chen fam/'/y? I

77?e genus Fissurina (F/g. 6): Asenspores Genus The species placed in this genus are characterised by fissure-like, inconspicuous fruiting bodies. Only some transversely septate^ Qraphis species develop more prominent, slightly thickened margins. The exci- pie is usually poorly developed, and muriform ** Graphina the spores are round to oval with jelly- like, often thick outer spore wall (halo).

77ie genus Hemithecium (F/g. 7) I F/emif/iecmm-species have pale, often cream-coloured lirellae with ere- Fig. 3: 77te sgstem 0/spore genera bg Mütter zlrg. (iSSO, iSS3j. nate or flaky margins and concealed discs. The uncarbonised exciple is well developed and we could observe that The exciple morphology with characters like in the same exciple new hymenia can develop sev- carbonisation, texture or overall shape. eral times resulting in multiple striations of the lateral exciple. The paraphyses-type with differences in pig- mentation and branching of the tips as well as 77)e genus Platygramme (F/g. 5) the nature of the cell wall (e. g. jelly-like, thick, Species belonging in the genus Ptafygramrae have thin). well developed, carbonised margins and open discs with greyish-white pruina. Cross sections through The ascospore-type i. e. the colour, the presence ascocarps (Fig. 8C) reveal that the carbonisation is of wall thickenings and the colour reaction with usually restricted to the apical part of the fruiting iodine (brown spores turn red with iodine, hya- body. In the lateral part of the exciple often crystals line spores turn blue-violet with iodine or show (Ca oxalate) are embedded. no reaction).

Homogenous species groups in respect of these char- Molecular genetic studies acters or character combinations could be detected and used as a basis for a new generic division of the Although most genera could be well circumscribed Graphidaceae. Three of these genera are introduced with the characters described above, some doubts here in detail: remained in respect of the classification of other

Fig. 4: Species-pairs w/it/t simiiar morp/ioZogicaZ c/iarac/ers being p/aceeZ in different genera; A- Graphina cingalina (above) and Graphis dumastii (betonG; 5; Graphina oryzoides (abovej and Graphis afzelii (betowj; C; Graphina anguina fabovej and Graphis hypolepta (be/on;J; bar 30 (cross sections t/irongfe ascocarps) or bar i 0 pra (ascospores).

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCESI Arch.Sei. (200S) 58: 53-621 I ÎHow to arrange the d/Vers/ïy of a frop/ca/ //'cden fam/'/y? Bettina STAIGER I 57 I species or species groups. Yet, these classification red). In all other genera of the family the ascospore problems could neither be solved with «classical» type is homogenous, indicating that this is an impor- microscopic methods nor with the analysis of second- tant generic character. ary chemistry. Meanwhile in lichen systematics molecular genetic approaches are state of the art. 7s t/ie exciple morp/toioflrp more important These methods offer the possibility to integrate addi- t/ian file ascospore type /or tiie yeneric tional, independent, non-morphological characters delimitation? and to develop phylogenetic hypothesis. Therefore we conducted a molecular study based on sequence The phylogenetic tree based on the molecular data data of two ribosomal genes: The mitochondrial small gave an interesting result: subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU) and the nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA (nLSU). The detailed One species ofTferaif/iecmra with hyaline spores (Ä results of this study will be published in a forthcom- implicate) is grouped together with Grap/tis ing paper (Staiger et al. in prep.). I want to present scripta and other Grapfws-species having hyaline here three examples how the molecular data gave spores but black, carbonised ascocarps. A second answers to remaining questions: species of Tferait/iecmTO with brown ascospores clusters in a branch with all other species having 1. When describing //eraitfiecmm we were faced brown ascospores of the same type. So the genus with the problem that the exciple morphology is very T/erait/Tecmra is not monophyletic. The molecular homogenous within this genus (see fig. 7), whereas study clearly shows that the ascospore type is an two different ascospore types are present: Some important character in the phylogeny of the species have hyaline, 1+ blue ascospores while others Graphidaceae while the excipular carbonisation have brown ascospores turning red with iodine (1+ seems to be of less relevance.

Figf. 5: /w/iomogreweity ofspore grewera - t/ie gerows Graphis. (drawiwgrs bg fiedfrgrer i936J. A' Graphis regularis; B: Graphis schizographa,- C: Graphis bogoriensis; D: Graphis hypolepta; Graphis aphanes; F: Graphis javanica.

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCESI Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I 58 I Bettina STAIGER How fo arrange the d/Vers/fy of a frop/'ca/ //'chen fam/'/y? I

Ftp. 6: Fruiting bodies of Fissurina-species: A- Fissurina Fig. 7: Fruiting bodies of Hemithecium-species; A columbina with/isstire-Zifce, mcowspicMows /iredae, bar Hemithecium chlorocarpum, bar 2 mm; 73: Hemithecium 2 mm; ß: Fissurina subcontexta with stighdg fhicfccnod chrysenteron with prominent, f/a/cg margins, bar 7 mm; C: margins, bar 7 mm; C: Cross section Jhrozrgh ascocarp of Cross section thro ugh ascocarp of Hemithecium balbisii with Fissurina cingalina, bar 20 gm. distinct striation of the taferat ea/cipte, bar .20 gm.

2. The genus Git/p/iis provides another interesting Bat is tiie parapiii/ses type more important example: tiian t/ie ascocarp siiape/or file rieiimitafion o/a yenas? When examining species of this genus we constantly The phylogenetic tree shows that all species of the found a very unique paraphyses type with brown genus Glypte - despite their differences in ascocarp granular tips and thick jelly-like walls. However the shape - cluster together in one well supported ascocarp-shape differs considerably within the branch. This result confirms not only the generic con- genus: Glypte szibstrictela has elongate lirellae cept of the genus Glypte but also the importance of and slit-like, narrow, concealed discs (fig. 9A); in the paraphyses type as generic character in the fam- Glypte cicafricosa the fruiting bodies are cluster- ily Graphidaceae. It also indicates that lirelliform ing together in a stroma (fig. 9B) and Glypte scy- fruiting bodies may have evolved several times in the p/iwli/era has open, round ascocarps (fig. 9C). phylogeny of the Graphidaceae.

I archives des SCIENCES I Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I How to arrange toe d/Vers/fy of a trop/ca/ //

3. A difficult subject in systematic studies is the cor- GypZoZabia a/^eZü (fig. 10) has a white covering con- rect assignment of homologous characters. taining the lichen substance lecanoric acid, while the Superficial similarities may pretend homologies. In covering of Graptois cton/socarpa (fig. 11) is orange the family Graphidaceae we could find two species and contains an antrachinone pigment. with carbonised ascocarps having very conspicuous «powdery» coverings: Both species share several morphological similarities (fig. 12): The exciple is convergent and carbonised; the conspicuous covering contains not only granula of the lichen substances but also hyaline hyphae that develop from the carbonised part of the exciple below (and not from the thallus!).

Fig. 8: Frwitmg fcodies ofPlatygramme-species: A: if«/ are Z/iese corering.s rca/Zy Ztoe res«// o/ owe ero- Platygramme australiensis wito prommewi, carbonised Zrt/ionary «inren/Zon» fi. e are Ztoey /tomo/ogod.sJ margins and open pruinose disc, bar i mm; 5: or is if a/so possib/e Ztoa / Ztoey /tare eroZred Zwtoce Platygramme reticulata, bar i mm; C: Cross sec/ion. torong/i in f/ie y/iy/oyeny o/ //re Grap/zidaceae i. e. /toe sim- ascocarp o/Platygramme australiensis icito apica/Zg i/ariZies are /toe res«//, o/a ccmuerr/enZ ero/«/ion? carbonised margins containing targe crystals, bar ,20 ^m. The phylogenetic analysis reveals that the two species are placed in very distant branches: .DypZoZabia a/zeZii clusters together with Fissurma-species at the basal branch of the tree whereas Grap/iis c/irysocarpa is grouped together with other Graptois species having no excipular cover. So despite the apparent similarities both species are not closely related; the coverings of Graptois ctorysocarpa and ZlypZoZabia a/ze/ii are no homologous characters but the result of two independent developments.

Summary

New generic concepts for the family Graphidaceae could be proposed based on detailed morphological studies of ascocarp features like exciple anatomy, paraphyses type and ascospore type (Staiger 2002). Additional molecular genetic investigations resulted in new insights in the phylogeny of the Graphidaceae and so offered the possibility to verify the new generic concepts. In addition the importance of morphological characters for the generic delimitation as well as their homology could be (at least partly) clar- ified. Three examples are presented:

1 1. The genus //arofZtoecmm as previously characterised based on excipular morphology is not monophyletic as species with different ascospore types (brown/hyaline) cluster in different branches. Thus indicates that the ascospore type is of great relevance in the phylogeny of the Graphidaceae.

I 2. The genus GZyptois, characterised by a uni- form paraphyses type is monophyletic despite great differences in ascocarp shape. So the paraphyses turned out to be crucial for the generic delimitation within the family.

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCESI Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I 60 I Bettina STAIGER How fo arrange the d/Vers/fy of a frop/ca/ //eben fam/'/y? I

Fig. 7 0; Dyplolabia afzelii, bar 7 mm.

Fig. 77: Graphis chrysocarpa, bor 7 mm.

3. The conspicuous ascocarp coverings present in Dypfotabm a/zelü and Grapbis c/rryso- carpa are no homologous characters but must have evolved at least two times in the evolution- ary history of the Graphidaceae.

Fig. 9: Glyphis-species icith different ascocarp shapes, A' Glyphis substriatula; 73: Glyphis cicatricosa; C: Glyphis scyphulifera 7?ar 7 mm.

Iarchives des SCIENCES I Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621 I How fo arrange rte d/Vers/'fy of a frop/'ca/ //'eben fam/'/y? Bettina STAIGER I 61 I

Fig. iü: Cross sections rtrowgft ascocarps 0/ Dyplolabia afzelii CAJ ond Graphis chrysocarpa (BJ; detaiis 0/rte excipidar coverings o/Dyplolabia afzelii fCj and Graphis chrysocarpa (Z3) a/ïer remrwa/ 0/ tieften acids and pigment grawa/a. Bar .20 ;am.

Acknowledgments Robert Lücking (Chicago, USA) and Franz Berger (Kopfing, Austria) made available fresh lichen sam- The «Promotionsförderung der Universität Regens- pies for the molecular study; type material was bürg» granted a three year scholarship and so prompty placed at our disposal by the curators of enabled me to carry out the examinations for the many herbaria. PhD thesis. The subsequent molecular study was I am also very grateful to Prof. Martin Grube and his financially supported by the German Research foun- lichenological working group in Graz (Austria) for dation DFG (Ka 14201-1+2). Most investigations warm hospitality during my stays there and support were carried out at the Institute of Botany at the in all matters of molecular phylogeny. University of Regensburg; thanks to Prof. Peter Last, but not least, many thanks to my doctoral advi- Poschlod, the head of the institute for providing the sor Prof. Klaus Kalb for providing all photographs of facilities of the institute. Grap/tidaceae, for many interesting discussions and for his never-ending, motivating enthusiasm.

References (literature cited)

I Müller Arg. J. 1880. Lichenologische Beiträge 10. - Flora 63:17-24, 40-45. I Müller Arg. J. 1882. Lichenologische Beiträge 15. - Flora 65: 291-306, 316-322, 326-337, 381-386, 397-402. I Redinger K. 1936. Die Graphidineen der Sunda-lnseln. - Rev. Bryol. Lichénol. 9: 37-122. i Schwendener S. 1869. Die Algentypen der Flechtengonidien. Basel, pp 1 -42. Staiger B. 2002. Die Flechtenfamilie Graphidaceae. Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung. - Biblioth. Lichenol. 85:1-526. Staiger B, Kalb K, Grube M. (in prep). Phylogeny and phenotypic variation in the liehen family Graphidaceae (Ostropales, Ascomycota). Zahlbruckner A. //?; Engler A, Prantl K. 1926. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten insbeson- dere den Nutzpflanzen. Leipzig, 8:61-270.

I ARCHIVES DES SCIENCESI Arch.Sei. (2005) 58: 53-621