<<

The James Webb Space Telescope

...your space telescope after Hubble

Dr. Rolf Jansen (Arizona State University, SESE)

Challenger Space Center of Arizona — Sep 24, 2011

Page 0 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

Ground: N.A. Sharp, AURA, NOAO, NSF HST: NASA, ESA, Hubble SM4 ERO Team ● provides darker sky background, higher resolution, and access to wavelengths inaccessable from the ground (absorbed by Earth’s atmosphere)

Page 1 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

● HST discovered that all large galaxies have a supermassive black hole at their center...

Page 2 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

... even our own Milky Way Galaxy and our nearest big neighbor, M31, the Andromeda Galaxy

Page 3 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collab.; B. Whitmore & J. Long

● HST gave us sharp views of star bursting galaxies, interacting galaxies, ...

Page 4 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

... and allowed us to trace galaxy assembly and subsequent evolution over the past 12 billion years

Page 5 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

● Recipe for a Universe ... Dark Energy???

NASA

Page 6 HST ● tr ihaBgBn,iflt,ltsme ni transparent until simmer let inflate, Bang, Big a with Start

(and WMAP AA/WA cec Team Science WMAP / NASA ’ srnmclRevolution Astronomical )’s ae7 Page HST ● e ieadco hog h akAe ni tr and stars until Ages Dark the through cool and rise Let (and 0 Time since the Big Bang Composite: (c)2011 R.A. Jansen WMAP seeds of structure Recombination / 380,000yr

usr gie h G esreionized gets IGM the ignite, quasars WMAP 1000 AA/WA cec em/RA Jansen R.A. / Team Science WMAP / NASA structure growth Cosmic Dark Ages / 10 million yr ’ srnmclRevolution Astronomical )’s 20 100 million yr start shining First Objects JWST 12 the Universe Young Galaxies / Reionization of 1 billion yr 1 2 6 Hubble Sequence Emergence of the Galaxy Evolution/ 13.7 billion yr Redshift, z present HST 0 ae8 Page Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

● 12 billion years of cosmic history in one picture

NASA, ESA, R. Windhorst (ASU), P. McCarthy (CIW), & R. O'Connell (UVa)

Page 9 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

NASA, ESA, N. Smith (UCBerkeley), Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA) ● HST gave new insights into the process within the Milky Way...

Page 10 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

HST /WFC3 ‘Mystic Mountain’

NASA, ESA, M. Livio and the Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)

Page 11 Background: HST’s Astronomical Revolution

Composite: (c)2007 R.A. Jansen NGC 602; NASA, ESA, STScI, Hubble Heritage Team (APOD Jan 10, 2007) ... and in nearby galaxies like the Small Magellanic Cloud (and beyond)

Page 12 But ...

● The Hubble Space Telescope will not last much beyond 2015

● HST is blind at wavelengths further into the near- and mid-infrared (cannot see light emitted by the first stars and proto-galactic clumps, or peer into dense star forming regions)

● HST is not big enough to detect the faint light from the first stars (even if it could see at longer wavelengths), and not big enough to characterize the atmospheres of Earth-like exoplanets in Earth-like orbits around their parent star.

Page 13 The James Webb Space Telescope

➤ Enter Hubble’s successor: The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST ), to be launched in 2018.

● JWST (then called the Next Generation Space Telescope) was the top- priority recommendation of the NRC’s 2000 Decadal Survey in Astronomy & Astrophysics (2010 Decadal Survey recommendations assume JWST ) ➤ designed to detect light from the first stars and to trace the evolution of galaxies from their formation to the present ➤ designed to characterize the nearest Earth-like exoplanets and their at- mospheres (presence of water vapor!) ➤ designed as a multi-purpose observatory (NASA Flagship mission) for the entire astronomical community ✓ allows rapid response to new discoveries, use for science not imagined in the design stages of the mission (HST ’s biggest discoveries were not the science for which it was built; same will be true for JWST )

Page 14 Comparison of JWST and HST

Sizes: 21.3ft (6.5m; JWST ) versus 7.9ft (2.4m; HST )

Page 15 Comparison of JWST and HST

John Mather, JWST Q&A Session, Sep 21 2011 In the near-infrared, JWST will have higher angular resolution than HST

Page 16 Comparison of JWST and HST

93.2 million miles

932,000 miles

350 mile

JWST

Composite: (c)2011 R.A. Jansen

ESA, R.A. Jansen Orbit: 932,000miles (JWST ) versus 350 miles (HST ); launch to L2 by Ariane5

Page 17

o e oi:”JWST movie: see (or JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: DeployAnimation-longversion”) nodn the Unfolding JWST 1 – ae18 Page JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: nodn the Unfolding JWST 2 – ae19 Page JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: nodn the Unfolding JWST 3 – ae20 Page JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: nodn the Unfolding JWST 4 – ae21 Page JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: nodn the Unfolding JWST 5 – ae22 Page JWST elyet dacdorigami advanced deployment: nodn the Unfolding JWST 6 – ae23 Page What will JWST look like?

Rendering of the fully deployed JWST

Page 24 What will JWST look like?

Perspective view from the rear of the fully deployed JWST

Page 25 What will JWST look like?

View from the side of the fully deployed JWST

Page 26 What will JWST look like?

Perspective view from below the fully deployed JWST

Page 27 JWST sSinicInstruments Scientific ’s ae28 Page ● ● ● ➤ ➤ ➤ Exoplanets: Disks: Debris System: Solar

bet ont 5mgiue esr eprtrsaddyna and temperatures measure origins magnitude; determine 25 to down Objects JWST JWST JWST planets -wr tr;dtc/esr ae etrsi atmospher in features water detect/measure stars; M-dwarf utgrains dust JWST NRpc esr hs uvso xpaesaon nearby around exoplanets of curves phase measure /NIRSpec: s circumstellar by emission the of structure resolve /MIRI: (Trans-Nep Belt Kuiper planets, giant gas of Spectra /MIRI: ’. cec ois(o starters) (for Topics Science so ‘ of es tunian) ocean ilicate mics; ae29 Page

oahnLnn,JS & eso,Sp2 2011 21 Sep Session, Q&A JWST Lunine, Jonathan JWST cec Topics Science ae30 Page

● ● ● JWST ➤ ➤ ➤ is Objects: First Evolution: Galaxy Clusters: Star and Stars trfrigglxe;iprac o oiainbde of budget ionization for importance galaxies; forming star n eettefis bet n xlsosi h Universe the in explosions and objects first the detect and JWST JWST JWST egh ftelgtaesrthds a that far so stretched are light the of lengths sta ‘failed’ from stars Galaxy our true throughout dwarfs) separates (which limit burning NRpcMR:maueecp rcino oiiglgtf light ionizing of fraction escape measure /NIRSpec+MIRI: hydrogen the to down function mass stellar measure /NIRCam: ilb bet e aki iet redshifts to time in back see to able be will cec ois(o tres (cont’d) starters) (for Topics Science HST a olne eetit) detect longer no can > weetewave- the (where 7 h Universe the so brown or rs rom ae31 Page

● JWST ➤ akEnergy: Dark JWST h nvreads epdtrietentr ftemysterio the of nature the determine Energy. help so and Universe the NRa ilacrtl esr h hnei xaso rat expansion in change the measure accurately will /NIRCam cec ois(o tres (cont’d) starters) (for Topics Science sDark us of e ae32 Page ● hurdles

needn opeesv eiwPnl(CP eotfinds report (ICRP) Panel Review Comprehensive Independent JWST eeomn Status Development otechnical no ae33 Page JWST rcP mt,JS & eso,Sp2 2011 21 Sep Session, Q&A JWST Smith, P. Eric eeomn Status Development ae34 Page JWST rcP mt,JS & eso,Sp2 2011 21 Sep Session, Q&A JWST Smith, P. Eric eeomn Status Development ae35 Page

JWST JWST rcP mt,JS & eso,Sp2 2011 21 Sep Session, Q&A JWST Smith, P. Eric usil ebaeEiern Model Enigeering Membrane Sunshield eeomn Status Development ae36 Page JWST JWST irrtsiga NASA-MSFC at testing mirror eeomn Status Development ae37 Page JWST

irradspotsrcuetsiga AAMF n GSFC and NASA-MSFC at testing structure support and mirror JWST eeomn Status Development ae38 Page ➤ ● ● ● anhi 2018. in launch JWST > in early scratch from invented technologies new 11 drcl vrenb h AAAscaeAdministrator) Associate NASA the by overseen (directly process aaeetcs susmtgtdb elevating by mitigated issues Management/cost ltd(nl otiuin yitrainlpartners) international by contributions (incl. pleted 5 fra ih adaepoue,i rdcin ne te under production, in procured, hardware flight real of 75%

otne omk ra rgesadi ntakfra for track on is and progress great make to continues JWST eeomn Status Development JWST JWST oa to sdevelopment ’s tn,o com- or sting, iiinlevel division ae39 Page JWST Development Under Threat

● Jul 2011: House voted on Appropriations Bill to reduce NASA’s 2012 Sci- ence budget (Earth Science, Planetary Science, Astrophysics, and Helio- physics) to $4B, explicitly terminating all funding ($ 431M) for JWST ➤ JWST would not be finished and launched; ➤ major threat to U.S. astronomy, loss of all its scientific opportunities and public excitement; ➤ lost JWST funding would not be reallocated to other missions, but be permanently lost to astronomy; ➤ damage to the international standing of NASA and the U.S. as an inter- national partner: ESA (Europe) and CSA (Canada) contribute >$1B to JWST.

● Sep 2011: Senate voted on its version of 2012 Appropriations Bill, propos- ing $5B for Science and explicitly restoring funding to JWST at a level ($530M) to allow launch in 2018.

Page 40 JWST Development Under Threat (cont’d)

● Oct 2011? Final 2012 NASA budget to be determined in full conference of House and Senate ➤ JWST could still be canceled in a comprise between House and Senate ➤ Wide public support is needed to save JWST ’s future.

Page 41 What you can do to help save JWST: web links

● http://www.savejwst.com/ ● http://twitter.com/#!/saveJWST

● http://www.facebook.com/SaveJWST ● http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

● http://www.change.org/petitions/do-not-cancel-funding-for-the-james-webb- space-telescope

● http://capwiz.com/supportjwst/home/

● http://savethistelescope.blogspot.com/ Learn more about JWST at:

● http://jwst.nasa.gov

● http://www.aura-astronomy.org/news/jwst.asp

● http://firstgalaxies.org/jwst/

Write your senator Jon Kyl and reps. Jeff Flake or David Schweikert

Page 42